Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution - Weekly Blog # 936

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution

  

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Preface

I was hoping to start a series of blogs on the selection of smart securities investment strategies for multi-generational ownership. Unfortunately, the current data does not lead to a positive view. The breakdown of the twenty-hour cease fire negotiation with the Iranians confirms that this was a week of data confusion. The historical odds were against progress in the search for political and economic solutions.

 

Our Side

The investment mode for the week is captured by the changes in the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey of the next six month’s market outlook. The bullish outlook improved slightly to 35.7% from 33.6% the prior week, a gain of 2.1% in a not highly disciplined survey. What is perhaps a little more insightful is a drop in the bearish measure to 43.0% from 51.4%, a decline of 8.4 %. During the survey week, many pundits were enthused about the forthcoming ceasefire meeting. (I expect Sunday morning’s announcement of a failure to get an agreement will materially impact this coming week’s results.)

 

The two largest stock market exchanges reflected different views, with only 31% of NYSE stocks falling vs 53% of NASDAQ stocks declining. (The NASDAQ market has younger, more speculative companies, with a larger number of companies reporting losses, including some private debt funds.)

 

Consumer sentiment was reported to be lowest in 70 years. Moody’s (*) raised the chance of a recession in the next 12 months to 48.6%. One of their executives is quoted as saying “we could already be in a recession”. 

(*) Owned in managed accounts.

 

Iranians’ View

The first thing to remember is that Iran is the modern name for Persia, which was the dominant political/military power in the Middle East for hundreds of years. Persia was briefly lost to Alexander the Great and later to the Ottomans but was never effectively occupied by foreign forces.

 

The current view of the Iranians is that Trump is losing this war. He is driven to achieve a quick victory to guarantee a positive mid-term election this year, at least in the House. The Iranians are believers in the German strategist Carl von Clausewitz’s statement that “war is an instrument of policy by other means”. Our President went to a military high school, but I believe he at best learned infantry tactics, not strategy. He did not participate in the ROTC at University of Pennsylvania. The current Secretary of War did not have any professional exposure at West Point or VMI and thus was not schooled in strategy. One of Clausewitz’s beliefs was getting the other side to give up the will to fight. Unfortunately, since WWII the US has won wars but lost the peace in getting their opponent to give up the willingness to fight. The last time we achieved it was through the Marshal Plan, named after General George Marshal a graduate of VMI who rebuilt the industrial strength of Germany.

 

While the potential for nuclear warfare was a concern, the far greater risk to the US, Britain, Europe, Mid East, Africa, Latin America, and Asia were already active sleeper cells. At this point we have not yet organized an effective counterforce.

 

It is no wonder the weekend discussions did not produce positive results. Consequently, it may be too early to invest new long-term money.

 

These are controversial views. Please exchange your thoughts. I am always a student and need to learn.

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: We Have a Management Problem - Weekly Blog # 935

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is History Rhyming Again? - Weekly Blog # 934

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Past Trends May Not Predict Future

There are times when using an old playbook is dangerous because the game has changed.

 

Inputs of Change

1. China overtook the US as Germany’s largest trading partner (fear of US tariffs?).
2. Meta cuts 600 jobs in their AI division.
3. Market rally is being led by low quality.
4. Consumer sentiment fell to 53.6 from 55.1 the prior month
5. Home ownership 40% more costly than renting. Will it change?

 

Other structural questions:

1. Is political power out of balance? IBES estimates 3rd quarter eps to be 10.4% and net income 8.8%, which to use?
2. Will later marriages and down-sizing earlier reduce demand for homes?
3. Will China follow the US in reducing competition through merger or bankruptcy? (autos/paints/investment and commercial banks/private capital).

 

Will we change schooling into education of life and business skills to help solve our problems.

 

Disclosure:

My personal portfolio of domestic and international securities assumes some of the answers to these questions. I could be wrong.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural - Weekly Blog # 909

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Fear of Instability Can Cause Trouble - Weekly Blog # 848

 

         

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Fear of Instability Can Cause Trouble

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Instability Changes the Players

Historically, the perceived strength of allies provides comfort to all fearing future conflicts. Changes can lead to instability, including a change in leadership, an unexpected industrial and military technology change, and demographic change. Some of these changes may happen almost overnight, while others may take generations.

 

In studying what caused World War I, all too many focus exclusively on the assignation of the Archduke of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. I suggest the following causes which arose at least 50 years before the assassination on June 28, 1914.

1. The declining economic power of Austria, due to excessive spending by the government and the wealthy.
2. A population still loyal to their old national governments.
3. The unification of Germany, which came much later than the other European and Middle Eastern countries. Germany was also late establishing colonies in Africa when compared to Britain, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, and the Netherlands.
4. The evolution of shipping from wind to steam power, and the development of the land-based maneuver practiced by Stonewall Jackson.
5. The rise of the US as a global sea power during the Spanish-American War (Great White Fleet).

Applying the same type of geo-politics/economics to the US after the meaningful stock market drop that followed the decline in jobs. The following elements should be noted:

• The pundit led consensus was wrong on the President’s capabilities and many factors concerning the economy.
• The rapid fall in the quit rate points to a further decline in the employment cost indicator.
• Commodity funds are cutting copper positions.
• Fundamental changes in the structure of the US stock market: In the latest week, NASDAQ trading was 6.6x more than the NYSE.
• In July, the performance of the equal weighted S&P 500 was 3% better than the cap-weighted version. Among the stocks with positive performance for the week were: Apple*#, Coke#, and a number of insurance stocks. (* owned by personal accounts, # owned by Berkshire Hathaway)
• 77% of NASDAQ stocks declined last week, versus 66% for the “Big Board”.

As both a contrarian and someone who reads history, I believe that Mr. Buffett building his cash & equivalent pile is the most bullish view I have seen in a long time. Mr. Buffett is getting ready to make positive investments in the future, he is not building reserves. I hope all of our subscribers are preparing to be bullish, which does not mean buying right now.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Detective Work of Analysts - Weekly Blog # 847

Mike Lipper's Blog: Our Self-Appointed Mission - Weekly Blog # 846

Mike Lipper's Blog: We are Never Fully Prepared - Weekly Blog # 845

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

The Rhyme Curse -Weekly Blog # 838

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

The Rhyme Curse

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

   

^{Analysts, lawyers, and accountants spend much of their careers relying on history to protect themselves and their organizations. I have often said, cut an investment analyst and a historian will bleed. Mark Twain is incorrectly identified with the following quote “History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes.”  To select the most useful rhymes, you should select from all past observations as an “AI” search would do, rather than just using the most useful observations. For example, in reviewing the number of years between the S&P 500 “all-time highs”, including 1929. There were 15 such occurrences, but they were of different durations: 25, 6, 5, 3, and 1-year durations). The most common period was one year, with 6 out of 15 periods being 1-year durations. In attempting to pick a relevant number of years, you should look at other factors. I would pick periods of rising government deficits. The center of this array is 5-6 years, suggesting a cyclical recession and possible periods of stagflation. A longer duration would imply a structural recession.}

 

^{Historical Inputs of Relevance Today}

^{In the 1890s US Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahon wrote on geopolitics and pointed out that Great Britain, a geographically small nation, was the real leader of the world due to its naval and commercial fleets. Both Germany and Japan got the message, which was fundamental in their preparation for WWI and WWII. China once had the largest fleet in the world, before they destroyed it themselves.}

 

^{The result of this seminal work was that once Germany was able to send its battleships through the Baltic to destroy British warships, WWI became a certainty. Prior to that the German General Staff, thru visits and other studies, had focused on the campaigns of General Stonewall Jackson in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, demonstrating the power of using mobility against fixed forces. After it’s treatment as an “ally” during the signing of the Peace treaty and the US curtailing its oil supply, Japan recognized the need for sea power, an issue which led to Pearl Harbor. Bringing the lesson and its probable impact on our future up to date. China has the largest naval fleet in the world today, and it is still growing while the US’s fleet declines.  China has almost half of the world’s shipbuilding capacity.}

 

^{Preparing for the Future}

^{The Capital Group, one of the great mutual fund and institutional investment managers, has entered into a joint venture with KKR to produce and sell hybrid funds. JP Morgan Chase, an organization that internally studies many possible futures, is prepared for interest rates between 2% and 8%. Their CFO is prepared for the tailwinds currently helping them to switch to headwinds.}

 

^{Many Different US Markets}

^{The only US Diversified Equity mutual fund sector to rise during the week through Thursday was large-cap growth funds, which was echoed by tech sector funds. While the NASDAQ advances volume rose for 4 days in the week, the NYSE Composite Index only advanced for one day. Low volume has led to less volatility.}

 

^{What Many are Not Prepared for}

^{The average age of world government leaders is 62, with 19% in their 70s and 5% in their 80s. The median age for US senators is 65, with the House member median age being 52. The average CEO is 56. While I hope all of our leaders are in good health and remain so, I suspect the emotional strain and lifestyle choices are incidental hurdles. As they age, they often become more conservative and prefer the old way of doing things.}

 

^{Investors are not prepared for change. I am currently noticing an increase in the rate of top spot replacements. Investors should therefore be prepared for leadership changes, which almost always result in younger and more vibrant leaders. There are other changes few are ready for, like a change in the Fed and other regulatory bodies, or a change in policies. I suspect there will be changes in private investments and how they deal with the public. As usual, low-risk equity and debt not designed to survive either stagflation or a major recession will come in late the.}

 

^{Let me know what investors need to be prepared for.}

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Most Dangerous Message - Weekly Blog # 837

Mike Lipper's Blog: Trade, Invest, and/or Sell - Weekly Blog # 836

Mike Lipper's Blog: Secular Investment Religions - Weekly Blog # 835

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Dangers “Smart Money” & Thin Markets - Weekly Blog # 816

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Dangers “Smart Money” & Thin Markets

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Christmas Breaks & Wishes

Like most weekly blog producers, I experienced an early December dilemma. Should I send out my seasonal best wishes to our readers and not produce the final December blog, or write it as usual? Not writing the blog was very tempting, but I then remembered George Washington’s very first military success in New Jersey. He and relatively small number of Patriots crossed the Delaware River and attacked the British (German Hessians) on Christmas Morning at Princeton.

 

My fear of a similar attack on our securities markets led to my decision to publish the blog. But to all our readers, I extend a very deep and heartfelt “Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays”

 

What Could Go Wrong?

1. I hope nothing.
2. The late December equity markets produced relatively light volume.
3. Below is a racetrack lesson on a not particularly distinguished bunch of horses registered for an unimportant race.

Late in the betting period there is a sudden surge in betting on a specific horse for no apparent reason. The chatter in the grandstand is that it was caused by external bookmakers balancing their betting exposure on a given horse. The presumption being that the clients of the bookmakers “knew” something that improved its probabilities. This surge was labeled “smart money” by those at the track. Sometimes, but not always, the chosen bet wins.

 

My fear is what market analysts call the distribution effect, because they understand what a third Obama White House doesn’t. That the initial absorber of sudden volume often tries to immediately offload as much of its liquidity volume on other players as possible. This secondary distribution can be repeated numerous times, enlarging the impact.

 

As happened during the last 2 hours on Wednesday, where all the major US stock indices fell significantly. Some observers pointed to a large trade, a series of large trades of a highly leveraged short-term derivative. By the end of the day individual securities were down multiple percentage points. Early Asian markets fell, but by the end of the trading day losses were small. On Thursday stocks rallied almost back to Wednesday’s opening and on Friday there was a slight gain.

 

This attack, like the one on the “British forces” at Princeton, did not have a material impact on the war other than to buoy up Washington’s spirits and please the Congress in Philadelphia.

 

I have no idea whether there will be other “smart money” surprises during the remainder of the year, but at least I am prepared.

 

Other Inputs Could Be Important

1. 58% of US households owned stocks in last 3 years, up from 53% previously. This included 21% from direct owners, up from 15% previously. (At some point this could have political implications). Only Estonia has a greater commitment to stocks.
2. All 3 major stock indices still have November price gaps.
3. Bankruptcies have risen to over 30% in the US and to over 25% in Germany.
4. Global deal flow is at a decade low.
5. PJIM forecasts sluggish growth for the next couple years.
6. FEDEX margins were materially down on a slight sales drop.
7. Many Wall Street bonuses were flat or up marginally.
8. The White House is considering an increase in Chinese tariffs, another pro-inflation move.
9. China announced new wide-ranging rules to reduce the number of on-line gaming hours. Not only did this wipe out $80 Billion in market value from the two largest Chinese game providers, but it also impacted other Chinese stocks and numerous stocks in other markets.
10. A picture is often worth more than a thousand words. The drawing room where the US President meets foreign leaders has 5 portraits of former presidents. The largest portrait is of FDR centered among the others. He appears crucial to the current President’s thinking. The similarities are pro-inflation, weak fighting forces, anti-business rules, higher taxes on the most productive, and isolationist policies. All of which turned a recession into a depression and encouraged our enemies. 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Searching For Answers - Weekly Blog # 815

Mike Lipper's Blog: Reactions from a Contrarian - Weekly Blog # 814

Mike Lipper's Blog: 3 Senior Lessons + Upsetting Parallel - Weekly Blog # 813

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Reactions from a Contrarian - Weekly Blog # 814

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Reactions from a Contrarian

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Surprises Pay More Than Consensus

Consensus, when right, is not highly rewarded. Contrarians are correct less than consensus suggests but they receive greater rewards. Over time, the bigger winners start out by being relative loners. With these guidelines, I review my reactions to media comments. (Remember, my absolute right to be wrong.)

 

The Indices are at yearly highs; therefore, we have entered a “bull market.”  Not necessarily! In some cases, these are not all-time highs. Additionally, the indices need to be measured in the most valuable currency in order to enter a new market cycle. Trading volumes are also not impressive. We live in a global world with the US dollar declining, so we ought to adjust the peaks and valleys accordingly.

 

Possibly the best summary of market moves comes from Bank of America, which describes it as emotionally bullish but intellectually bearish.

 

When the Fed pivots it will be a seminal event. Possibly, but odds are it will be late. For those predicting a pivot, they are like football fans calling the pivot wrong six times in a row. They could be right, but their odds are no better than 50/50.

 

There are at least three other reasons to question the timing of an interest rate cut.

1. The original ignition of the inflation fire was caused by the Administration pouring an excessive amount of cash into consumer’s hands and restricting domestic trade.
2. Congress pushed the responsibility for full employment to a bunch of financial economists at the Fed, which led to it becoming politicized.
3. Most importantly, the largest factor in the US economy is not the production of goods, it is services. In general, service providers don’t need to borrow money for capital expenditures and inventory.

 

Current Market Focus Does Not Address Long-Term Problems

Almost all the attention of market participants is focused on short-term events, which are expected to determine short-term results. Media performance reporting on minute by minute, day by day, week by week, and year by year results view this as the only essential reality. These short timeframes are essentially important to traders, but of little value to long-term investors.

 

Most money invested in the market is for retirement, or longer. The assumption ought to be that the average worker probably still has 25 years before retirement and a somewhat similar period in retirement. Many institutions can have indefinite lives. Thus, the things that are really important to these investors are actions impacting the long-term progress of their assets and liabilities.

 

One of the reasons good analysts and portfolio managers study history is to get an understanding of market cycles, which are caused by insufficient supply of goods and services in the minds of consumers and investors, followed by periods of too much excessive production. These trends take a long to very long time to evolve. However, their terminal stages often occur swiftly and rarely reverse.

 

Three Trends That Hurt Investors

1. Political skills are paramount over operating skills. Most large organizations are comprised of collections of people with different backgrounds and strengths. Those who rise to the top are most often chosen for their political skills, with less attention paid to their operating and investment skills. These leaders recognize that their positions have finite termination dates, so their decision process is relatively short-term, with little regard for long-term implications.
2. The costs of developing and maintaining military strength reduces the available supply for other funding. There are a relatively small number of nations with significant power. The US has historically cut military spending sharply during “peace time”, as it tends to fall behind the ambitions of autocrats. Considering the current crop of political leaders and their tendency to cut military spending after inflation. Today there is no large military power that has any respect for the current US power base. They however recognize our potential, much like Germany and Japan did prior to WWII, making the world an increasingly less safe place. The leaders of Western Europe recognize that they cannot defend themselves. One leading expert believes that Germany needs 30 years to build its own independent force to safely defend Germany.
3. By far the biggest threat to the US, both commercially and militarily, is our youth. Based on global test comparisons, US students rank below mid-point in math and not close to the top in reading and science. Remember, we probably have the most expensive educational system in the world. To protect professors the US government measures academic college success over six years. In the UK, the normal college period is three years.

 

 Other Items of Concern

1. John Authers, now at Bloomberg and formerly with the Financial Times, believes that we should expect US defaults, particularly of regional banks.  Altman Z scores are the lowest since 1987.
2. China has stopped publishing youth unemployment data. (This habit of putting out just positives raises more questions than answers.)

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: 3 Senior Lessons + Upsetting Parallel - Weekly Blog # 813

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Cyclical World + Consistent Results - Weekly Blog # 812

Mike Lipper’s Blog: Recognizing a Professional: Ratings vs Ranking – Weekly Blog # 811

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Not Yet! - Weekly blog # 800

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Not Yet!

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

The Thinking Behind Blog 800

When I realized the 800^th blog was coming up I tried to think of something special to discuss, like a critical turning point at the beginning of a new long-term market cycle. I see a turning point in the future which will begin a new corrective cycle. It will address multiple imbalances facing the US stock market, a reflection of increasingly problematic domestic and global problems.

 

However, it now appears we are likely going more toward a shallow dip, which could be labeled either a “soft landing” or a ripple in a stagflation period. Regardless, the underlying tensions continue to build and they will eventually lead to a deep corrective stage. With the 100^th blog less than 4 full years away, I have high confidence we will see a major correction.

 

Regardless of the timing and depth of the correction, we remain largely invested in equities and stock funds. These funds will need guiding principles to survive the correction and prosper from the following “bull” market.

 

Sources of My Guidelines for Long-Term Successful Investing

• Fidelity has published their views on 5 mega trends.
• Marathon in London has written about the benefits of low turnover and stable managements.
• Howard Marks expressed his views on escaping extreme investing.
• Finally, my own observations on the investment decisions of funds, commuters, and actuarial lessons on betting.

 

Productivity/Profits- Fidelity

Fidelity probably invests in almost every investment any place in the world. They serve different types of clients in many capacities and countries. Of the 5 Mega Emerging Trends, the most easily measured is the slowdown in the growth of productivity, more specifically in the productivity of labor. Labor is easily measured in terms of the number of hours committed to work, likely for compensation. (What is not evaluated is the quality of the work.) The number of hours worked in the US is in the upper portion of the lower half as shown below:

   More than US      US    Less than US

UAE          2709  1892   UK        1866

India        2480         Germany   1783

China        2392         Australia 1669

Mexico       2220         Canada    1664

South Africa 2154         France    1565 

Thailand     2108

Poland       2085

Indonesia    2043  

Philippines  2039  

Russia       1965

 

Implications

1. In a world that has higher interest rates and is short of opportunities, there are more places competitive with the US.
2. When US proclaims politically motivated holidays, such as Labor Day.

 

In an article by Howard Marx, he warns about extreme stock prices. When extreme enthusiasm pushes prices to record highs or lows, investors sell stocks priced for perfection, or buy/retain stocks which can never generate good news. Most of the time securities trend in one direction or the other. A dangerous condition is when all opinions on a security are totally one-sided. Very few investors understand that it is rare for there to be no salvage value for knowledgeable investors with patience and legal backing.

 

An example of too many one-sided beliefs was the 50 institutionally favored stocks in the early 1970s (Nifty Fifty). It was believed that these stocks could be bought and never sold, after the recommendations of the leading institutional brokerage houses didn’t work out. In 1972 the list contained Eastman Kodak, Polaroid, Sears, and Kresge. In the years that followed, all four disappeared through bankruptcy. To demonstrate how much reputational power these stocks had. One senior investment officer was an early promoter of Polaroid and managed to ride that performance into being hired as the senior investment officer at a New York based mutual fund house. He didn’t last long in a company that was studied daily, including its longer-term performance.

 

Marathon in London has a successful record with its European fund and others. They are a low portfolio turnover shop who pay a lot of attention to industrial and corporate capital cycles and meet with long-term senior management extensively. They are very proud of the 26% of their portfolio that has been held for more than 10 years in the European fund. Those positions represented 45% of that portfolio at the end of the period. When I visited them, I was amazed at their detailed knowledge of their companies, managements, and critical competitive information.

 

There are many investment lessons I have learned from just observing and listening to people. For example, I suspected the market was getting frothy in the late 1960s when a person I commuted with on a 6 AM train mentioned he had gotten a personal computer and was going to stay home and day trade a handful of stocks. He was a mid-level executive at a famous financial institution and appeared to have average intelligence. I was working for a firm that had a very active trading desk that regularly dealt with some of the sharpest trading shops. Very occasionally I heard one-side of a phone conversation between the traders. I felt I needed a translation regarding their words and tactics. I am sure my former train buddy knew no more than I did about institutional trading. Hopefully he learned quickly or found a new job. I never saw him on the train again.

 

I owe UPS a gift for the two investment lessons I learned from them this week. There was a public announcement that the company was offering early retirement to 167 senior pilots. Each of their planes carries about 30,000 packages and is designed to fly every day. Consequently, in terms of delivery capacity, it meant UPS would deliver 1.8 billion fewer packages or these packages would be flown by less expensive junior pilots. It suggested to me that UPS was expecting less business after their expensive settlement with their truck drivers. Within the week our friendly regular UPS driver delivered some low value drug store items, which may have come from a warehouse or a local store under half mile away. In either case, it was not a bullish indicator for me.

 

During the very same period institutions were locking into long-term investing in the nifty-fifty stocks, there was a more valuable lesson a few miles from Wall Street. On a Saturday in June of 1973 the Belmont Stakes was run. It was not much of a contest. Secretariat won by 31 lengths, setting a track record. While that was interesting, the real lesson of the day was that I didn’t bet on what was clearly the best horse in the race. More importantly, I did not bet on any horse in the race. When Secretariat won, the horse paid $2.20 for each $2.00 bet. What I learned was that even with the best horse in the world things can happen, or if you will “racing luck” might happen. (Sounds as if I was conscious of Howard Marx’s avoiding absolute certainty.) I was practicing good actuarial science, which excludes events so rare that they are unlikely to reappear. What I learned was that to not bet is a bet. Wagers should only be made when the odds of winning are high enough to cover losses in the past or in the future.

 

Conclusion

Investing should not be considered a single chance to make or lose money. The more you are aware of the world around you, the better your chances of finding some winning investments and keeping your losses small.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What Do Single Digits Mean? - Weekly Blog # 799

Mike Lipper's Blog: Some Past Errors Create Future Problems - Weekly Blog # 798

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inputs to Implications - Weekly Blog # 797

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Predictions Suffered Last Week - Weekly Blog # 789

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Predictions Suffered Last Week

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

The price movement of various securities indices reported in the electronic and old form press is believed by the public and some not very sophisticated investors to be insightful. What is worse is that the current readings compared to past readings are considered predictive of future readings.

 

On Wednesday afternoon the Federal Reserve announced that it was not going to raise interest rates. The chattering media and pundits proclaimed that this would send a false signal of a new bull market. We saw a substantial increase in trading volume compared to the rather low transaction volume seen in the second quarter. If this was meaningful, we should have seen a continuation of higher stock market prices. IT DIDN’T HAPPEN. The percentage of declines on the NYSE for the week was 1.8%, and 4.9% for the more market savvy NASDAQ. The VIX volatility indicator was near its low for the year.

One of the lessons on betting (handicapping) at the track is to first read the conditions of the race, which may be different for each race. The fixed income market is often ahead of the equity market, particularly in terms of risk. According to Barron’s, the average yield on 10 high-yield bonds jumped 50 basis points compared to a similar measure of mid-quality bonds, which declined 7 basis points. There is good reason for rates on high-yield bonds to go up, as there have been 30 defaults in the last 5 months, with 11 in the last month. This is concerning after worrisome conditions for the race changed.

Most market worriers focus on the probability of a recession, which is often quickly over, generally lasting under two years. Stagflation is another and possibility worse outcome, generally resulting in more than ten years of anemic growth with rising inflation. The Fed is watching what they call core services, which is largely influenced by the level of inflated wages.

The key background for investors was a press conference following the announcement, which was devoted to the reasons the Fed was skipping a rate increase and considering two rate increases for the rest of the year. My belief, denied by the Chair, was recognition that the Fed has become more politically conscious, much like the Supreme Court. It appears that it was difficult to get enough governors and senior staff to cogently agree to a specific policy.

This highlights a growing lack of confidence in various speakers, be they officials or pundits. Making no decision is in effect making a decision. The biggest problem facing long-term investors is attempting to meet the need to pay for future obligations. Based on past experience, the relative price of solving future needs will be higher than average prices in the same category. I expect to pay at the high end of future interest rates. Thus, in many cases my future needs will be more expensive than they presently are. I must therefore grow the capital committed to meet future requirements.

On an intermediate term basis, the cutback in the level of employment in the financial sector opens up risk to the rest of the financial losers.  It reduces potential sales for the industry, resulting in less capital and higher interest rates for the users of capital. Additionally, some departing the industry were tasked with preventing errors of omission and commission.

The soul of long-term investing is the growth and use of capital. On a long-term basis this relies on population growth and the skills of people, which are changing. Below is a table projected by some experts of the five leading countries in 2022, 2050, and 2075:

Five Leading Global Economies

2022               2050            2075
USA                China           China
China              USA             India
Japan              India           USA
Germany            Indonesia       Indonesia
India              Germany         Nigeria

While I might somewhat disagree with this array, I need to ponder these things for the benefit of my grandchildren and great grandchildren. I welcome any thoughts from our subscribers.

(This draft was partially written on a delayed flight from Newark. The United Captain explained that the delay was in part due to COVID. A number of aircraft controllers did not return to their jobs and the government actions* have been slow in replacing them. This may be one of the frictional problems leading to less efficient delivery of services. We can measure this in the overall lower productivity of labor as much as expected.)

* For example, adding politically motivated holidays when each non-working day can lower productivity by half of one percent (.5/200)   

I must make our capital work harder when interest rates drop, and stock prices do not correspondingly rise due to low productivity and government actions. We can’t afford to wait too long before we raise our commitment, even if we temporarily miss possible future bargain prices.

Conclusion

Beware of quick and easy solutions.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Head Fake, Unrecognized Opportunity, or a Minsky Moment - Weekly Blog # 788

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Course to Explain Last Week - Weekly Blog # 787

Mike Lipper's Blog: TOO MANY HISTORIC LESSONS - Weekly Blog # 786

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.