Long-Term Money Via Telescope, Not Microscope - Weekly Blog # 951

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Long-Term Money Via Telescope,

Not Microscope

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Historical Perspective

One lesson from studying history, including geology, is guessing the very next move in a series, which is more likely to be random than consecutive. The news business is an exception, selling a detailed description of what just happened. For example, the weekend chronicles might point out that more stock prices went down than up for the latest week and did so with higher volume. They’ll mention that only 58% of the NYSE stocks declined for the week, including 38% on Friday, compared to the NASDAQ where 64% fell for the week and 55% fell on Friday. Not one of these pundits mention that in the earlier part of this year and most of last year a greater portion of the stocks traded on the NASDAQ rose. More importantly, these stocks were bought much more recently than those on the NYSE. This suggests that both the purchase and sale of the NASDAQ stocks were speculative, not long-term oriented investments.

 

Switching to the telescope for longer time periods. Long-term investors should focus on the changing structure of the US population, where more than 1.8 million people left the workforce (169 million in June 2026 vs 171 million in September 2025). Some of these people trade stocks and participate in the weekly sample survey of the American Association of the Individual Investors (AAII). This week they turned bearish on their outlook for the next six months, with only 29.6% now being bullish, down from 44.9% the prior week. Bearish beliefs have risen to 42.3% from 32.9% the prior week.

 

Investors have generally missed gains in some global and international funds, as well as commodity and alternative funds. To understand the current performance of diversified funds you need to recognize the increased concentration in a limited number of sectors. The history of making money in the stock market often goes along with being lonely during changing long-term future trends.

 

One advantage of devoting time to investing is occasionally seeing some occurrences replay. On Thursday there was the rescheduled White House Correspondents Dinner with the President speaking, which reminded me of my time as chair of the program committee of the New York Society of Security Analysts. I suggested to the President of the Society that we invite President Gerald Ford, the only non-elected president of the US to speak to the analysts. I was given permission to invite him, with the deep belief that it wouldn’t happen. I called the White House and spoke to the lead speech writer who thought it was a great idea, agreeing to speak to the higher authorities. Surprisingly, they were looking at opportunities for the President to speak to the financial community about his “Whip Inflation Now” or “WIN”. I was invited to visit the White House to meet with the speech writer and go over the President’s thoughts on the subject. It became clear that they didn’t really care about my political views, but what jokes would be appropriate. I rejected most of the jokes. Shortly thereafter President Ford came to our meeting quarters on Williams Street. He came with Alan Greenspan and Frank Zarb, who had just joined the Cabinet after a career of turning around several brokerage firms. A topic I would have liked to hear more about. When the President came to the NYSSA, he was the first President since George Washington to speak on “Wall Street” while still in office. He included all the proposed bad jokes.

 

When President Trump spoke to the correspondents this week, he also told jokes that did not go over well. It seems as if Presidents speak about what they want and not about what their audiences want to hear. Like many investors, they don’t learn from history.

 

Those of us who pay attention to future liabilities for clients and ourselves should focus on the long term. What do you think?    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Before Focusing on Shorter-Term Reactions - Weekly Blog # 950

Mike Lipper's Blog: Little Occurred During the Trading Week - Weekly Blog # 949

Mike Lipper's Blog: Searching for Future Long-Term Picks: Gathering Assets, Reasons to Search - Weekly Blog # 948

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

This Weekend’s Learning Sources - Weekly Blog # 939

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

This Weekend’s Learning Sources

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Identifying sources of learning

One of the main differences between us and most animals is that our brains are larger, which hopefully means we can learn more. The end of this week supplied three sources of learning. The three teams of instructors were: Tim Cook (Steve Jobs), Berkshire Hathaway’s Annual Meeting with shareholders (Warren Buffett/Charlie Munger and Greg Able), and the Bettors and Horses at the Kentucky Derby. From each I can learn a lot. Matter of fact, each could be a whole semester at Business Schools instead of what they are currently teaching.

 

Tim Cook (Steve Jobs)

At the end of the so-called work week Tim Cook conducted what was his last quarterly meeting for shareholders and analysts of Apple (*). He focused on the company’s critical relationships with customers and what is owed to them. He stressed what Steve Jobs taught, the betterment of the users’ lives. These were the critical thoughts passed onto the oncoming new President of Apple. We should pass these views onto all we deal with, focusing less on what they paid us and more on what we did for them.

* Owned in personal and client accounts.

 

Warren Buffett/ Charlie Munger & Greg Able

Mr. Buffett spoke to many of the shareholders attending the annual Berkshire Hathaway (*) meeting, both in person and electronically. His advice for people reaching 50 years or older was to switch their primary investment focus from making money to capital preservation. He emphasized saying no, particularly to not well understood new investments. (I do not own any “AI” stocks directly, but there are many in mutual funds I own. The key to their future is what they have yet to produce, not what they are selling today.) He believes investors in retirement should prune their holdings and try to explain what they own to their heirs, feeling it is more beneficial to focus on how the inheritance should be used rather than the intricacies of what is owned.

* Owned in personal and client accounts.

 

Greg Able is the new President of the company and is focused on improving the operations of the company. When the talented Chief Financial Officer transitions into retirement, he will be replaced with both a CFO and a new lawyer. Furthermore, for the 31 private companies owned by Berkshire, he has appointed a trusted internal executive as leader. Instead of doing just financial oversight, he will be reviewing the operations of the formerly private companies. Good policies of the past will be reviewed to see if they are right for now.

 

My personal view is that there are two major trends which we did not have to deal with in the past, but which could be much more important in the future. The first is one of the causes of financial and economic cyclicality resulting from not repaying debt on time and at full value. Defaults on debt have led to depressions in the past and have been the cause of unplanned contractions.

 

In the decade of the 1920s into the early 1930s society encouraged the global extension of debt at the retail level, including its use as a defense against tariffs (Smoot Hawley).  Currently, we have an expanded federal debt led by someone who needed to renegotiate his own debt. Our government encourages investing retirement capital in debt. The national debt is larger than the GNP. (Old debt has a due date, while GNP is produced each year.)

 

The second dangerous trend is the value of the dollar in world trade. As debt grows, overseas investors value it less. Meaning, it not only becomes more expensive for funding our debt, but also for paying for imports of food, clothing, and raw materials. We are better positioned than many other countries who are in worst shape, but not all. Asia, which has a younger population and a disciplined workforce, is in better shape. Higher inflation leads to lower long-term value of the currency. One measure of inflation not issued by our overworked government is the ECRI Index of Industrial Prices, which was up 140.35% this week for the last 52 weeks.  

 

Kentucky Derby

I brought this on myself by stating that I learned the basic tenants of analysis at the New York Racetracks. A subscriber asked who I was betting on in the race. Where do I begin? Perhaps with two axioms. First, as with most things in life, short answers are often wrong. The short answers are wrong because they are stated without limits and conditions. That brings us to the second axiom, I don’t like losing. I don’t like losing because it is a double loss. The first loss is the sum wagered, and the second is the loss of funds necessary for future betting and other things.

 

There are two negatives against betting at the track. First, the track takes a cut of all bets and there are personal expenses of travel, admissions, and food. Second, as a game of chance it is rigged because of the track’s take. Additionally, winnings are taxable at federal and state levels. There is still another drawback, about 30% to 50% of the time the lowest yielding horse wins. Most of the time those winnings are not large enough to offset losses and expenses incurred. I address this problem by limiting the number of times I bet, usually 3 out of 9 races and rarely at the lowest odds. The advantage of this approach is staying away from betting at the lowest odds, which are the most popular horses.

 

If these issues did not cause you to find other things to bet on, the elements of the Derby might. First, the race is only for three-year-old horses. While horses are born for the record throughout the year, under racing law all horses are born on January 1st. Some horses start their racing history at 2 years old, but many do not. By the time they are three years old they are adolescent. (From a scientific standpoint it would be useful to know the actual date of birth. There is poor but available information as to the number of official races the horse has run. In terms of the Derby, the range I heard was 1 to 4 races.) For those of my age, I am reluctant to take adolescent horses and most humans seriously.

 

So, after all this I did not place a bet on this year’s Derby. Most of the time I am not interested in races for three-year olds that are run any earlier than June, which starts with the Belmont Stakes race. These races are also a bit suspect because the course has been altered.

 

I would not have bet on the winner this year. However, the trainer deserves to be congratulated as she was the first woman trainer to win the Derby. The night before she had a dam which won the Kentucky Oaks with the same jockey who won the Kentucky Derby. Quite an accomplishment.

 

All of this shows I am still a student and hope you are as well.

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Watch Out for the Four - Weekly Blog # 938

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors’ Interlude - Weekly Blog # 937

Mike Lipper's Blog: Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution - Weekly Blog # 936

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Watch Out for the Four - Weekly Blog # 938

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Watch Out for the Four

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Preface

As subscribers have been told, I am shifting my focus to investing for long-term gains, hopefully for multiple generations. This is the time to begin searching for future winners, although it’s not the time to begin serious buying. If you are like me, at times it can be difficult to only follow an investment intellectually. I need to own a small amount so that I go through all the relevant info while awaiting the time to begin a meaningful buy program.

 

Timing May Not Begin Until:

The beginning of the buy program will not start until people and the data change. In terms of people, there are four structural leaders. These are the men who wish to change the future and are governing to do that. They lead and largely dictate activities in the US, China, Russia, and North Korea. Only the last one, North Korea, is preparing to eventually pass the torch of control to a very young daughter. In each case the eventual leader will be different than the present leader and will have to exert power to stay in place. Any of these replacements could have input into future global investments. Because of the similar ages of the first three, investors will be faced with cross currents that will make choosing investment policy difficult.

 

Before these leadership transitions occur, the global economy is likely to change multiple times. I expect we will be dealing with the terrible “4s”* at least some of the time. The data series likely to experience major swings are inflation, currencies, and taxes, among others. Changes to these data series may not be dictated from on high, but in the marketplace. Additionally, secular changes in demographics and technology will have an impact on how people act and feel.

*Terrible 4s are 4% for inflation, unemployment, and dollar decline, leading to an S&P 500 price that starts with a “4”. A high 4 signals a recession and a low 4 a depression.

 

What Can We Do Now?

First, we can pay attention to what people are doing, not saying. Actions speak louder than words. While the media is full of pundits talking about market indices at new highs, 58% of the stocks on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) fell in the latest week. Perhaps more meaningful, 56% of the stocks fell on the NASDAQ. A survey of investment advisers and their clients found advisers twice as bullish as their customers.

 

Second, be aware of financial and economic history. We know that historic patterns don’t exactly repeat, but directionally they are pretty accurate. Economic cycles are based in part on the level of debt being created throughout the system. (Government deficits need to be considered as well as business debt, personal debt, and accidental debt.)

 

When debt repayment becomes too burdensome it won’t be promptly repaid and will cause purchasing power to drop and fixed income/equity markets to decline. Depending on the severity of the decline it will be called a recession or a depression. The frequency of recessions is normally five to ten years, suggesting one is due. A depression is much more serious and infrequent, usually every fifty to one hundred years. Depressions are often caused by mismanagement of an economy in a recession. We have not had a depression for ninety years and some believe the last one brought on WWII. The key for us is knowing that these occurrences are possible and being aware and ready to change behavior.

 

While Waiting

The present should be devoted to looking for stocks to buy for the next expansion. A study of the past suggests the leaders of the next cycle will be quite different than the present. Bearing in mind that many children born today will need retirement money 100 years from now, the odds of most large companies surviving is not good.

 

There are lots of ways to choose stocks to research. None of them are perfect and they will change over time, so investors should always be learning what will cause change. From time to time, I’ll pick one approach to explore briefly, so keep tuned to find an approach that helps you.

 

Acquisitions

No solution is perfect, and conditions change unpredictably. It is normal to change our choices after looking at the cards we are given. The easiest approach is to add a new holding and temporarily retire a present holding. Additionally, no one plays the investment game without making periodic acquisitions. Unfortunately, many investors fail to discard some part of what is not working. This habit of adding without discarding leads to an ever-increasing number of acquisitions, which in most cases leads to average and eventually below average results.

 

I have never seen an acquirer who couldn’t benefit from getting more talent, often with different characteristics than their existing talent. I have often found it better to buy a company for management and tax purposes, even if it’s for a single individual. It has worked for me, even when it was a bad choice. It is easier for me to make a bad choice than to fire an individual or a small group who I like as people, but not as workers and co-venturers. I am comfortable with the way Apple often buys tiny companies, compared to others who acquire much larger companies with all sorts of personnel problems.

 

I was speaking with the manager of a small unit in a very large company who wanted the unit to grow by hiring more people doing the same thing his present employees do. That may be efficient in terms of output, but it just adds to existing problems. I would not view this situation as growth but view it as adding new machines. If on the other hand the new people brought new talents, they could serve a different group of clients who had different needs, which is real growth.

 

There are some companies who try to grow by buying distant operations, adding resources outside their prime geographical area. I do not view this as growth of talent either, but as getting more copies of existing machines. They would be adding to present capacity but not getting new talents that could open new markets. For me they are not growth engines but merely machine acquirers, which will not be valuable talents as the business changes. Investors can see which type of stock I would acquire, even at somewhat of a premium price.

 

Question: What do you think about my approach?  

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors’ Interlude - Weekly Blog # 937

Mike Lipper's Blog: Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution - Weekly Blog # 936

Mike Lipper's Blog: We Have a Management Problem - Weekly Blog # 935

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

We Have a Management Problem - Weekly Blog # 935

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings 

We Have a Management Problem

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                         

 

The Founding Fathers Saw it

When unsuccessful in getting George Washington to accept the title of King they decided to name him President, a person who presides over others that are powerful. Notice, they did not choose Executive or Manager. Interesting.

 

Today, the elected leader of the country comes from the commercial world and governs as a Chief Executive. Interesting. The difference between the two labels is that the presiding officer needs to work with other elected officers and not command his or her views become absolute commands.

 

Different Styles = Different Results

The largest owner/leader of a private family company has only the marketplace or regulator that prevents almost complete dictatorial power. This is reinforced by having family members in the named positions. It is worth noting, rarely if ever is one of the senior family members hired away to run a separate public company.  Interesting.

 

One of the realities of managing a successful company is that senior people are often hired away to run competitive companies. GE, JP Morgan Chase*, and Apple* are good examples.

* Indicates shares owned in personal and managed accounts. Interesting

 

The Selling Problem

Emotionally, selling is much more difficult than buying. Afterall, buying is an act of new faith in both a stock and the individual making the decision. At the time of purchase the stock position is the single best bet the investor can make.

 

Selling sometimes involves disappointment in the stock or can be the need for account liquidity. It is like the pain of selling one’s children or losing a personal extremity, but at the time of sale it is the least loved stock in the portfolio. Emotionally it is relatively easy to set up a buying program that purchases a position over time, such as buying a certain number of shares each month for the next year as one gains conviction. However, selling is an entirely different mindset as it is painful to lose a limb or a child, the quicker the better. That may be why more shares have been sold at declining prices on down days for the last six months. Since selling is more emotional it probably makes tactical sense to sell over time. Interesting

 

Reasons to Consider Selling Programs

1. The US has the highest inflation rate of all the advanced economies.
2. Iran has a functioning economy, despite the bombing.
3. There are only 3 mutual fund sector averages that beat the +13.66% 10-year compound average of S&P 500 index funds; Science & Tech +17.82%, Precious Metals Equity +16.77%, and Large-Cap Growth +14.61%. My guess is that it is unlikely these three sectors will outperform the average US diversified fund’s return of +11.16%, nor will they produce double digit gains in the next 10 years.
4. The “Hyperscalers” are commodity players that depend on the long-term prices of fuels for their plants.
5. The Walmart (stock) Recession Signal +10.89% vs the S&P Luxury Price Average -14.8%.
6. Fixed Income strategies in the future won’t follow historical patterns.
7. The President has borrowed the most money and runs the government with biggest deficit. They are urging retail investors to buy debt securities.
8. Ray Dalio believes in the histories of recessions, concluding we are currently in stage five on the way to six.
9. Fitch has noted that the default rate on private debt has risen.
10. The ECRI industrial price index has risen to 135.06, which is a +14.21% increase in the last 12 months.          
11. Note: The job gains for March included jobs for healthcare, which require larger amounts of social assistance and produce less GDP per person.
12. Homer Jenkins Jr. noted in the WSJ that “Trump is a lame duck with low appeal and a surplus of voter distrust.” 
13. We won’t have peace in the middle east until Iran’s sponsorship of death and destruction in the US, UK, Europe, Mideast, Africa, and Asia ends.

 

Interesting. Be Careful                                    

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is History Rhyming Again? - Weekly Blog # 934

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

Mike Lipper's Blog: This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

1 week = 1 month, or 1 or more years

From this investor’s viewpoint, the previous five trading days could be seen as a great dichotomy. Seventy seven percent of NYSE stock prices declined and 66% of NASDAQ stocks. Additionally, the US dollar rose in price to 100.362 on Friday from 97.70 on Thursday!!

 

The stock price decline was supported by a sharply increased bearish reading in the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey looking 6-months ahead, which rose to 46.4% from 35.5% the prior week. There was only a slight fall in the bullish six-month prediction which fell to 31.9% from 33.1% the prior week. Large publicly traded companies continued to report little to no hiring to offset those retiring.

 

One might have thought that worries about inflation would have had more impact, with the ECRI industrial price indicator rising to 130.99% from 126% the prior week. The index was up 9.59% for the last 12 months, but that didn’t seem to retard the jump in the dollar on Friday.

 

If one listened to the advocates of The President, the move in Friday’s dollar pointed to good times ahead. Other factors they mentioned were part of the reason the majority sold stocks this week, including on the last day of the week. We therefore have a dichotomy, which is a condition that can’t last or perhaps requires a different analysis?

 

The correct analysis is a condition that possibly occurs to seniors. That is the need to get corrective eyewear (glasses or implants). Perhaps we need to use one set of lenses for short distances and one for long or perhaps use bifocals.

 

We could be drawing close to the time when we will know whether the short-term optimistic view or the longer-term more pessimistic view followed by optimism is correct.

 

Watch the S&P 500

There are four major US stock market indices quoted in the press. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) consists of just 30 stocks weighted by their stock prices, whereast he Standard & Poor’s 500 is weighted by market capitalization. The NASDAQ Composite is also capitalization weighted of about 500 stocks, although some stocks don’t have public records for five and ten years. The Russell 2000 Index is small-cap focused and suffers from a significant number of companies reporting losses. For analytical and investment purposes, most large financial institutions use the S&P 500 Index.

 

The S&P 500 Index closed at 6,632 on Friday, the lowest price in over four months. Market analysts believe a further decline of more than 3% will make a near-term market rise above its former high of 7,002 difficult for an extended period. The reason for this is, many of the investors who bought stocks before the decline will try to breakeven on the way up, making progress slow. 

 

Question: What do you think?

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

  

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Basic Investment Principle

Investment opportunities are cyclical in both timing and magnitude. Larger gains are achieved after periods of extended declines. Since one does not know the extent of a decline or magnitude, it is wise to use a buying program. For instance, invest no more than 10% of buying reserves at any time. (This assumes you establish a buying reserve in rising markets. Charlie Munger has taught us to buy good companies at fair prices rather than always look for “cheap” prices.

 

Recently, my sister-in-law sent me a copy of a letter from my grandfather to my late brother sometime after he left the Marine Corps to begin his life in the investment business in the mid-1950s. My grandfather, who built his own brokerage firm for more than thirty years, cautioned my brother to always expect periodic recessions and less frequent depressions. He also advised him to not invest against the US, as the country was rich in natural resources. (This is still good advice, but there are times when our government makes our currency risky for a period.)

 

Where are We?

Most investors in defining where we are, do so by looking at where we have come from. The pundits wax poetic about recent data extrapolations, expecting the past to be repeated. My analytical training at the New York racetracks and as a US Marines Corp Officer was to always examine the current situation and expect some change.

 

Today, many pundits and politicians see an improving picture. As a student of financial history, I am conscious that it has been some time since the last recession. Furthermore, it has been 97 years since the Wall Street crash and the 12-year depression. Few people recognize any similarity between that time and our current condition.

 

Trading Alerts-Correction, Recession, or Depression?

The following are a number of alerts from last week suggesting we are entering a period of more declines than increases:

1. Morgan Stanley is planning to cut 3% of its customer-facing workers.
2. 73% of stocks traded down on the NYSE and 67% on the NASDAQ. A pattern which has been going on for several weeks.
3. The ECRI industrial price index rose to 126%, a 4.73% gain year over year. Clearly, the war in the mid-east is inflationary. 85% of prices tracked by the Wall Street Journal each weekend declined, echoing the ECRI results
4. Individual investors and those serving retail investors are not confident in their outlook for the next 6 months. 33.1% are bullish and 35.5% bearish.
5. The S&P 500 index is the best indicator of the market for both institutional investors and wealthy investors. Along with most other indices, the S&P 500 index fell on Friday. If this was the beginning of a recession and the index were to decline to where its rise began, it would drop 28%. If this was the beginning of a relatively mild depression, the drop could be 49%.

 

Advice to Buy Program Buyers

I have found it extremely difficult to buy at the exact bottom, as most declines don’t appear convincing enough. The advantage of using a buy program strategy instead of a one-shot purchase is that you will likely have a collection of winners and losers before the overall market has reached back to its original starting point, assuming you buy 10% each month or quarter. However, that is not the point of the exercise. You should want to hold your position until it has reached the condition of a great company at too high a price, where some trimming makes sense.

 

Please share your thoughts with us.   

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission

Failed Expectations: Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips - Weekly Blog # 925

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Failed Expectations

Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Was this the week that was?

Last week’s blog anticipated a ruling by the US Supreme Court on the Presidential use of Executive Orders to impose tariffs on countries and products. It was further expected that the President would use substitute measures to accomplish similar goals if he loses the Supreme Court case. Additionally, there was a belief that the government would be forced to repay the existing tariffs to the American people (voters). The new tariffs would probably cause some changes by foreign nations. None of this happened.

 

Instead, the major topic of conversation at the World Economic Forum at Davos was Greenland. Discussions moved at lightening or Trump speed from a military occupation to a not fully disclosed peaceful agreement with NATO forces by the end of the week. The importance of these dramatic changes reminds us of what may be topic one in developing future investment strategies. All of this brief history shows how wrong we can be. What we missed was the significant price level change that occurred this week.

 

Critical Price Changes

Starting with the least followed ECRI industrial price index, which normally moves ploddingly. The index rose to 126.28 from the prior week’s 120.49. The jump raised the year-over-year gain to 6.58%, which is greater than the various inflation measures the Fed and many others use. I would not be surprised to see industrial buyers of products add this amount to their resale prices, after adding an insurance amount to protect their profits against further prices increases.

 

One explanation of ECRI prices can be found in the weekly price chart in the weekend Wall Street Journal, which showed Natural Gas rising +70.0% and Silver +14.57% for the week. Part of these increases could be for increased use of these items in the normal course of business. However, I suspect some of the increased demand comes from trading and/or gambling interests, either on the long side or from covering short positions. The importance of the last sentence is that the size of the trading and gambling sectors is growing, and I believe it’s already quite large.

 

The third price increase impacts all of us in our daily purchase of goods and services. It is the value of the dollar. On Friday the 16th of January the US dollar index was 99.395, one week later it was 97.599. The President has threatened foreign countries if they sell US assets!! (I personally believe this won’t happen, but it shows a sensitivity to the value of the dollar, even though Trump and Xi have both advocated for a lower value of their currencies as mercantilists.)

 

Warning

I have already indicated how wrong I can be. Please be careful in developing your own investment strategy and make changes slowly, not abruptly.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923 Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Is This The Week That Ends Instability?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 Preface

I believe it was Lenin who said there are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen. Possibly, the four-day trading week beginning this coming Tuesday is such a period. In both the Financial Times and her podcast, Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab* introduced the concept of the period we are going through as an extended period of instability. I am suggesting it is possible the beginning of the end of this period may have begun.

*Shares held in in managed and personal accounts.

 

Fund Data Sets the Table

Whether one invests in mutual funds or not, one should recognize that not only do many people invest in them, but more importantly, many fund managers get their training at fund shops. Thus, one can get an understanding of the institutional mind set by looking at fund data. In the five years ended last Thursday, the London Stock Exchange Group published my old firm’s weekly study of 105 equity related mutual fund peer-groups average performances.

 

The average performance of S&P 500 Index funds was 14.05% compounded for the past five years.  There were only five peer group averages that were better: Precious Metals Equity Funds +21.50%, Energy MLP Funds +20.79%, Commodities Precious Metals Funds +18.75%, Natural Resources Funds +17.30%, and Global Natural Resources Funds +16.05%.  There were just two better performing thematic categories, precious metals and energy. The narrowness of performance leadership proves how difficult it was to pick winners for the past five years. The leadership crown was indeed unstable.

 

Another way to identify the instability in economic data is to examine the tails of the best and worst 2 items shown in Saturday’s WSJ weekly price chart. The best was Silver +11.67% and the second best was the KOPSI +5.55%. The second worst price performance was Financials -2.33%, which was half as bad as Corn -4.71%, the worst performer. The gaps between the top two leaders and laggards suggest concentration is at play.

 

Turning Points Possible Next Week

On Tuesday, probably in the late afternoon, SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the US) is expected to announce its decision on the IEEPA tariff. The President has said he is prepared for an unfavorable ruling and has substitute measures in mind. At best this will be disruptive, and possibly inflationary. The ECRI industrial price index, which is normally slow moving, rose to 120.49% from the prior week’s level of 117.42%.

 

Markets are anticipating problems, either from Tariffs or possibly Iran. Sixty-two percent of the stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rose last week, while only fifty-three percent rose on the NASDAQ. The NASDAQ trades more tech stocks and the shares of younger companies. Thus, the junior exchange is likely to react more than the “Big Board” to news events. Retail investors, when not gambling, are more active on the junior market. One possible measure of this is the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey, which reported 49.5% bullish for the next six months, up from 42.5% the prior week. What may be more significant is the 28.2% that were bearish. Many professional traders believe “the public” is wrong at turning points.

 

The Davos meeting begins Tuesday, with many political and economic leaders present and chatting. One doesn’t know what will be discussed and how meaningful the meetings will be.

 

Keep us Informed as to any Changes in Your Views.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

 

 

Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Data May Be Signaling Change

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Preface

I came to my desk Saturday morning and was prepared to begin writing this week’s blog. My thought pattern suggested we were quite possibly in a pivot period, with market leadership shifting to foreign priced securities priced substantially below “AI” securities. Then I paid attention to Bloomberg television, which is on 24 hours a day. I was mesmerized by the news on the raid on Caracas, the capital of Venezuela. The daring and skills involved were impressive and the growing implications are disturbing.

 

Normally, I try to view everything from a global perspective, as I believe almost all we do has roots in the global world. However, for this week’s blog I am not going to deal with the longer-term implications of the successful raid and capture of indicted criminals. It is too early to tell. I expect these events will create global shadows which I will address in future blogs. The world listens but does not necessarily follow the U.S

 

Pivoting to the Data

 

Last Two Weeks of 2025

Each of the last two trading weeks, including January 2nd, have had only four trading days of relatively light trading volume. A disproportionate number of trades were either tax motivated, or position statement driven. Nevertheless, they share traits with many earlier days of December’s trading, with more stocks sold on minus ticks than rising prices. It is worth noting that the popular stock market indices generally rose a small amount. This highlights the dichotomy in the market between what many believe are retail driven indices and a broader, slower-moving institutional market. I am guessing many retirement and other long-term institutions were relatively quiet in the last part of 2025.

 

This institutional hesitation mirrors the large corporations’ labor practices, where many companies spend considerable amounts training new employees, which they consider assets. They are therefore reluctant to fire many employees and are slow to hire new workers. Some believe in the “promise of “AI”, where in the not-too-distant future companies will need less employees to produce the same or more sales. Consequently, many employers are not hiring new employees, other than critical replacements.

 

Typically, corporations begin investing new capital into their retirement plans in January, be it pension or 401-k accounts. The institutional advisory community has counted on this flow in the past. My guess, it may be smaller this year. We will see.  

 

Prices and Inflation

There were two lessons on prices in the Weekend Edition of The Wall Street Journal, which measures 72 traded items each week. Only 24 prices or one-third were up, and 48 prices were down. Are we peaking? The second lesson from these data is that markets deal with both extreme momentary shortages and slower moving prices, which are more common. One analytical technique I use to differentiate them is to examine the top and bottom two prices. On the upside is Comex Silver +142.34% and Platinum +127.57%. On the downside are Orange Juice -58.75% and Cocoa -48.05%. I believe these four are special imbalances, as the third extreme prices are the KOSPI composite +75.63% and the Argentine Peso -28.96%. The gaps between the extremes and third ranking are large. Much smaller but concerning nevertheless is the one-week industrial prices gain of +1.28% in the ECRI weekly index, suggesting inflation is not under control.

 

The Key Link

If there were a single suggestion of a world view of the US economy, it would be the value of the US dollar. The Financial Times headline “Dollar Is Wild Card in 2026”. This UK publication, now owned by the Japanese newspaper/wire service giant, is a traditional critic of the US. The value of the dollar is dependent on two factors, the value of the other major currencies and the price of the dollar. In 2025, numerous foreign markets have for the first time in many years appreciated more than the US. Currencies, like securities, are priced at their perceived future value. Not only is the US government spending more than it is earning through taxes and tariffs, but it’s also expected by many to continue to do so in the future. (Even if tariffs bring in a lot of money, part of the receipts are expected to be paid to citizens instead of being used to pay our debts.) In addition, both President Trump and Chairman Yi have stated they would both like their currencies to decline. Some weakness in the dollar may have been caused by individual and institutional investors selling dollars to buy foreign securities.

 

What to Do?

Examine whether it is prudent to have 100% of your long-term investment money in securities that are traded primarily in dollars? Is it time to pivot?

 

Share your thoughts, please.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Appeals Court Rules (7vs4) Against Trump, but Life Goes On - Weekly Blog # 904

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Appeals Court Rules (7vs4)

Against Trump, but Life Goes On

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

All of us were unprepared

The “Founding Fathers” designed our government to protect the minority against the majority, with the courts ruling on critical decisions. Now that the future of tariffs rests with the courts, I suspect The President will push for a quick decision.

 

I would hope at the end of judgement day we will have answers to two of the motivating drivers behind The President using tariffs to force discussions with both Congress and foreign countries.

• The first is “Non-Tariff Trade Barriers”, which may be larger than the size of the reciprocal tariffs, which are policies the importing nation forces on the exporting nation. The prohibition of certain fertilizers on imported food elements, or various power constraints on mechanical equipment or transportation vehicles are examples. There are a multitude of restrictions like these imposed by national or local governments on people’s taste buds. In total, these restrictions may very well be enormous in aggregate.
• The second issue is the use of the money generated by the tariffs. (It is well worth remembering that for more than a hundred years, tariffs were the main source of funding for the US government.) Economically, tariffs are a tax on the society. However, it is not clear whether the funds raised will fall under the control of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or some other instrument of government. The funds raised may potentially be used to reduce the existing deficit, pay for the newly issued tax breaks, or paid out directly to consumers.

The answers to these questions are needed to solve the riddle of weather these tariffs add to or reduce inflation. The independence of the Federal Reserve Bank is therefore a critical factor in dealing with the tariff issues. Many feel the Fed controls short-term interest rates and influences intermediate-term rates. However, it is not that simple. In an article by George Calhoun in Forbes, he lists recent experiences where the Fed lowered rates while the markets raised them. One of the reasons rates rose is the dollar declined or was expected to fall. George Calhoun is a professor and fellow board member at the Stevens Institute of Technology.

 

The commodity markets are keenly conscious of inflation expectations. This week commodity futures rose, led by natural gas +2.64%, gold +1.21%, and copper +1.01%. Another way to play the same trend is in the stocks of the commodity producers, which are owned by specialty funds. Specialty precious metals funds rose +2.70%, China funds +1.31%, Agricultural funds +1.30%, and Base Metals funds +1.12%. While the Courts will decide on the appropriate questions, the markets will collectively reward those who guess right regarding the direction of prices.

 

Please provide any thoughts that might give me a clue on how to avoid losing money and perhaps make some.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

"The Week That Wasn't"

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

History or Not

TWTWTW (Was the abbreviation for "That Was The Week That Was". The British had a somewhat comical review of critical news, with jibes at our doings or non-doings. In a number of ways this past week was one of increased anticipation of the steps toward smoothing out some of our problems. The most critical was a cease fire in Ukraine, which would be a step toward ending the killing in that war torn country, and would also influence global economic trends. These results were expected to lead to more sales in the US and abroad, allowing the Fed to lower interest rates.

 

At the so-called summit in Alaska the two antagonists spent three hours restating existing positions but found only some unannounced agreement on how to reach a ceasefire.

 

At the same time a collection of US central bankers met to discuss economic policy, which to most of the public was encapsulated to mean changing the short-term Federal Funds rate. The official topics to be discussed were demographics, productivity, and immigration’s impact on changing the US job market.

 

Some available data points indicate that early in the next century the US population will peak. Long-term labor productivity is largely driven by education, beginning at the earliest school and home days through the graduate levels. Education is lacking appropriate leadership and funding. In the past, immigration brought us hard-working, intelligent people, a trend that could now be reversing.

 

What is the Data saying?

The following are some data points I am reading, in no particular order:

1. This being an investment blog it is important to note that the bottom of the US stock market occurred in 1929, before depression analysis officially began. This suggests the stock market may be an early warning signal.
2. The "Taylor Rule" predicts the Fed funds rate. It states the current Fed funds rate of 4.5% should be 5%.
3. Deere reduced its revenue estimate. Farm income was in a recession before the depression, and it was one reason for passage of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. (I believe one reason the current Fed has been reluctant to lower interest rates are the many smaller midwestern and western bank loans and the feelings of their senators. Jamie Dimon is also concerned that it is difficult to quickly take over community banks under present rules.)
4. Jerome Powell is looking at the impact of tariffs on business services excluding shelter, which appears to be rising faster than other measures of inflation. In the month of July business services rose 1.4%.
5. Over the last 3 weeks the AAII sample survey’s bearish projections have risen to 46.2% from 33.0%.
6. Each Saturday The WSJ measures the prices of 72 items. In studying the data, I have noted that the single largest gainer or decliner often results from an unusual market factor. Consequently, I look at the second biggest gainer or loser and look at the spread between the two. In the latest week S&P 500 Health Care rose +4.62% while Comex Gold sank -3.00%, a spread of 7.62% which looks normal.
7. In the week ended Thursday, the best performing mutual fund peer groups were those unpopular for most of this year. (This suggests for the moment that there is safety in unpopularity. If you are looking for the best odds, bet on a material change. All three of the small company categories: growth, core, and value show promise.

 

Working Conclusion

Beneath the surface there is a lot happening, both in the long-term (the next century) and from a trading viewpoint. One should pay attention to quiet markets.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rising Risk Focus - Weekly Blog # 900

Mike Lipper's Blog: Melt Up Not Convincing - Weekly Blog # 899

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.