Is This the Last Hurrah? - Weekly Blog # 945

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Is This the Last Hurrah?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

 Preface

Hurrah is both a shout of victory and a political world about aging politicians, warning that the following election won’t be a happy one. (BTW it is pronounced Oorah in the Marines and Hoorah by the Army.)

 

I don’t know whether the reception for the largest IPO of all time is a sign we will not see larger market enthusiasm in the future. I am talking about both the size of the SpaceX offering and the further gains generated after underwriting.  What I do know that it was a record fundraise at a time when many non “AI” stocks are dealing with mediocre sales. Consumer sentiment is at its lowest on record going back to the early 1950s

 

More importantly, I am trying to find investments for the next “bull” market. My assumption is that we will experience a substantial rise after a major correction to the present market level.

 

The Process

The first thing I don’t do is look for clues to a different future by crunching GAAP numbers found in today’s annual reports or other regulatory accounting statements. To the extent present sales data may be useful, they need to be adjusted to match reality. For example, today it looks like semiconductor companies are doing very well in Taiwan and South Korea. Truth is, only some of their product sales are produced in their home country, with increasingly more in other countries. More importantly, I am guessing their ultimate sales are to US customers. Thus, investors are concerned that many of these so-labeled international companies are extremely sensitive to what is happening in the US.

 

Forward Looking Analysis (Guessing)

The example that I discuss should not be treated as a buy recommendation and should only be rendered knowing the economic condition, resources, and personality of the buyer. The case I will discuss shortly is a long-standing large position with a large unrealized potential tax liability, although the analytical thinking may also be appropriate for the reader.

 

The stock is Berkshire Hathaway. The news item is the $8.5 billion purchase of Taylor-Morrison Homes for cash, including the assumption of some debt. The initial size is about 1/3rd of Berkshire’s annual net free cash flow, excluding their large cash reserves.

 

The decision made by the new CEO of Berkshire was completed in matter of weeks and was applauded by Warren Buffet. The announced plan is to create a housing group combining Taylor-Morrison with already owned Clayton Homes, which manufactures homes at a lower price point. Taylor-Morrison builds communities of new middle-class houses as well as rental housing. There is a national need for more housing.

 

I believe this purchase is very similar to Berkshire buying See’s Candy, which was initially misunderstood by some as Berkshire going into the Candy business. They were instead going into the franchising business, which has been an excellent business for McDonalds. In this case they would be going into the home mortgage business in a major way, with a controlled sample.  Furthermore, this is a sign that Greg Able the new CEO of Berkshire, has different talents and proclivities than Mr. Buffet without the guidance of the late Charlie Munger.

 

This is an example of how to investigate the future. 

 

Let us know what you think about our views?

                                         

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Warnings Increasing - Weekly Blog # 943

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rhymes + Future Opportunities - Weekly Blog # 942

Mike Lipper's Blog: Many Trends Within the Same Market - Weekly Blog # 941

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution - Weekly Blog # 936

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution

  

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Preface

I was hoping to start a series of blogs on the selection of smart securities investment strategies for multi-generational ownership. Unfortunately, the current data does not lead to a positive view. The breakdown of the twenty-hour cease fire negotiation with the Iranians confirms that this was a week of data confusion. The historical odds were against progress in the search for political and economic solutions.

 

Our Side

The investment mode for the week is captured by the changes in the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey of the next six month’s market outlook. The bullish outlook improved slightly to 35.7% from 33.6% the prior week, a gain of 2.1% in a not highly disciplined survey. What is perhaps a little more insightful is a drop in the bearish measure to 43.0% from 51.4%, a decline of 8.4 %. During the survey week, many pundits were enthused about the forthcoming ceasefire meeting. (I expect Sunday morning’s announcement of a failure to get an agreement will materially impact this coming week’s results.)

 

The two largest stock market exchanges reflected different views, with only 31% of NYSE stocks falling vs 53% of NASDAQ stocks declining. (The NASDAQ market has younger, more speculative companies, with a larger number of companies reporting losses, including some private debt funds.)

 

Consumer sentiment was reported to be lowest in 70 years. Moody’s (*) raised the chance of a recession in the next 12 months to 48.6%. One of their executives is quoted as saying “we could already be in a recession”. 

(*) Owned in managed accounts.

 

Iranians’ View

The first thing to remember is that Iran is the modern name for Persia, which was the dominant political/military power in the Middle East for hundreds of years. Persia was briefly lost to Alexander the Great and later to the Ottomans but was never effectively occupied by foreign forces.

 

The current view of the Iranians is that Trump is losing this war. He is driven to achieve a quick victory to guarantee a positive mid-term election this year, at least in the House. The Iranians are believers in the German strategist Carl von Clausewitz’s statement that “war is an instrument of policy by other means”. Our President went to a military high school, but I believe he at best learned infantry tactics, not strategy. He did not participate in the ROTC at University of Pennsylvania. The current Secretary of War did not have any professional exposure at West Point or VMI and thus was not schooled in strategy. One of Clausewitz’s beliefs was getting the other side to give up the will to fight. Unfortunately, since WWII the US has won wars but lost the peace in getting their opponent to give up the willingness to fight. The last time we achieved it was through the Marshal Plan, named after General George Marshal a graduate of VMI who rebuilt the industrial strength of Germany.

 

While the potential for nuclear warfare was a concern, the far greater risk to the US, Britain, Europe, Mid East, Africa, Latin America, and Asia were already active sleeper cells. At this point we have not yet organized an effective counterforce.

 

It is no wonder the weekend discussions did not produce positive results. Consequently, it may be too early to invest new long-term money.

 

These are controversial views. Please exchange your thoughts. I am always a student and need to learn.

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: We Have a Management Problem - Weekly Blog # 935

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is History Rhyming Again? - Weekly Blog # 934

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Past Trends May Not Predict Future

There are times when using an old playbook is dangerous because the game has changed.

 

Inputs of Change

1. China overtook the US as Germany’s largest trading partner (fear of US tariffs?).
2. Meta cuts 600 jobs in their AI division.
3. Market rally is being led by low quality.
4. Consumer sentiment fell to 53.6 from 55.1 the prior month
5. Home ownership 40% more costly than renting. Will it change?

 

Other structural questions:

1. Is political power out of balance? IBES estimates 3rd quarter eps to be 10.4% and net income 8.8%, which to use?
2. Will later marriages and down-sizing earlier reduce demand for homes?
3. Will China follow the US in reducing competition through merger or bankruptcy? (autos/paints/investment and commercial banks/private capital).

 

Will we change schooling into education of life and business skills to help solve our problems.

 

Disclosure:

My personal portfolio of domestic and international securities assumes some of the answers to these questions. I could be wrong.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural - Weekly Blog # 909

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Are We Going to Get “Ds”? - Weekly Blog # 694

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Are We Going to Get “Ds”?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

School Communications

In the dark ages when I went to schools that used letter grades, the letter D was dreaded because it indicated you took the class, got credit for it, but did not get credit toward graduation. Today we live in a world where changes in sentiment are often a precursor for changing results.

With that in mind, I read the Barron’s Review & Preview column at 3:30 Saturday morning. The column was based on the latest University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Survey, which called the reading a “stunning loss of confidence”. Sentiment in the first half of August dropped 13.5% from July’s reading. The University of Michigan survey noted that over the last half century there were only six deeper cuts. Clearly this was an emotional response. 

My job as an investment manager requires balancing potential risk and reward. In most periods both range between 40%-60%, although these normal bounds of expectations are exceeded every now and then. As this could be one of those periods, I believe it is now analytically appropriate to look at more dramatic expectations on the downside. 

Investment Implications of Declining Ds

Investors are unhappy for the following reasons:

Disappointment 

• The potential loss of US and Afghan lives
• Acceptance of being a smaller global military power
• Government generated inflation through excessive money supply growth
• Rising energy prices
• The personalities of political leaders at various levels
• While not pleased, investors are not sufficiently worried to generate taxes on extra taxable gains

Discouragement

• After the very large gains achieved from the March 2020 bottom, some give back is expected 
• Concerns over the increase in speculative activity in the public and private markets 
• The unknown impact of the Delta variant potentially lengthening the forthcoming correction 
• Normal pruning of portfolios makes sense to eliminate investments with weak prospects or questionable sponsorships 

Disappear

• Growing cracks in society, the economy, and politics are not being addressed with enough attention. Their impacts will reduce the comforts of capital long-term. 
• Well-guarded, dispersed reserves and controlled expenses become more important.

Depression

• While highly unlikely, a depression is possible due to mistakes like the March 13, 1930 passage of the Smoot Hawley Tariff. Up to that time many people felt Herbert Hoover was a great humanitarian and good President. Herbert Hoover lost re-election in a landside because he agreed with the political forces supporting the farm block. They had suffered a few years of bad weather leading to a substantial rise in farm indebtedness and low-price agricultural imports. Some US manufacturers were also hurt by imports. What was not evidently considered by US politicians was their raised tariffs being reciprocated by most other countries. This led to world trade and the value of our currency declining. One could argue that it also accelerated the rise of totalitarian governments in Germany and Japan. Hopefully, we won’t make a similar mistake in the future. However, if we experience a depression, survivors should be able to invest in good assets managed by talented people.

Lessons from Bob Farrell

Bob Farrell was the head of research at Merrill Lynch for decades. From his perch he saw both the markets and the actions of Merrill’s customers. Because his firm had the largest number of retail customers, he saw much more than the rest of us did. Thus, his “10 Market Rules to Remember” is well worth bearing in mind, particularly in a low volume rather trendless US stock market.

1. Markets return to the Mean
2. Excesses usually lead to opposite excesses
3. Excesses are never permanent
4. Rapidly rising or falling markets usually go further than expected and don’t correct sideways
5. The public buys mostly at the top and least at the bottom
6. Fear and greed are stronger than long-term resolve
7. Markets are stronger when broad and weak when narrow
8. Bear markets have three stages: sharp down (-20% or more), reflexive rebound (“suckers’ rally”), and a long-drawn-out fundamental downtrend.
9. When all “experts” agree, something else will happen
10. Bull markets are more fun than bear markets

Applying Farrell’s Lessons

Rule 9 warns of unanimity of expert opinion. I suggest that rule be applied to the latest report by the UN experts on Global Warming stating “It’s just guaranteed that it is going to get worse”. They further state that it is “unequivocal” and an “established fact”. 

While I don’t know what the future will bring, there is a large body of contrary opinion based on current and prehistoric geological history. I have been privileged to listen to Caltech professors and students who have a range of views, although they have never expressed the degree of certainty the UN scientists proclaim. 

Two other predictions of certainty from US government sources raise questions as to the accuracy of their expressed opinions. Next month will be the fiftieth anniversary of President Nixon closing the “gold window”, where foreign governments could buy gold at $35 an ounce. This was meant to protect the US against imported inflation and protect the value of the US dollar. In the last fifty years we have had both inflation and a decline in the purchasing power of the dollar.

More recently, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued its analysis of expected labor productivity. For the period 2021-2031, they expect the potential labor force to grow 0.4% per annum, compared to 0.5% in the 2008-2020 period. They suggest it will produce labor productivity of 1.5% in the next decade compared with 1.2 % in the prior period. I question the conclusion, although it is possible if there is large scale automation and qualified labor to operate the machines and computers.

When I was in school taking “true and false” tests, we were urged to doubt any statement that carried the words “always and never”. This fits well with my real source of education, the racetrack, where there never was a sure thing other than the track and government taking a piece of the action before I got paid.

 

Application of this blog’s lessons

1. A change in sentiment can lead to a change in market direction, possibly soon.
2. Wherever and whenever possible we should be adopting the thinking expressed by Bob Farrell.
3. Be wary of predictions with an extreme view of certainty.
4. Learn from mistakes and teach those lessons.  

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/08/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings_8.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/08/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/07/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings_25.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.