Appeals Court Rules (7vs4) Against Trump, but Life Goes On - Weekly Blog # 904

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Appeals Court Rules (7vs4)

Against Trump, but Life Goes On

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

All of us were unprepared

The “Founding Fathers” designed our government to protect the minority against the majority, with the courts ruling on critical decisions. Now that the future of tariffs rests with the courts, I suspect The President will push for a quick decision.

 

I would hope at the end of judgement day we will have answers to two of the motivating drivers behind The President using tariffs to force discussions with both Congress and foreign countries.

• The first is “Non-Tariff Trade Barriers”, which may be larger than the size of the reciprocal tariffs, which are policies the importing nation forces on the exporting nation. The prohibition of certain fertilizers on imported food elements, or various power constraints on mechanical equipment or transportation vehicles are examples. There are a multitude of restrictions like these imposed by national or local governments on people’s taste buds. In total, these restrictions may very well be enormous in aggregate.
• The second issue is the use of the money generated by the tariffs. (It is well worth remembering that for more than a hundred years, tariffs were the main source of funding for the US government.) Economically, tariffs are a tax on the society. However, it is not clear whether the funds raised will fall under the control of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or some other instrument of government. The funds raised may potentially be used to reduce the existing deficit, pay for the newly issued tax breaks, or paid out directly to consumers.

The answers to these questions are needed to solve the riddle of weather these tariffs add to or reduce inflation. The independence of the Federal Reserve Bank is therefore a critical factor in dealing with the tariff issues. Many feel the Fed controls short-term interest rates and influences intermediate-term rates. However, it is not that simple. In an article by George Calhoun in Forbes, he lists recent experiences where the Fed lowered rates while the markets raised them. One of the reasons rates rose is the dollar declined or was expected to fall. George Calhoun is a professor and fellow board member at the Stevens Institute of Technology.

 

The commodity markets are keenly conscious of inflation expectations. This week commodity futures rose, led by natural gas +2.64%, gold +1.21%, and copper +1.01%. Another way to play the same trend is in the stocks of the commodity producers, which are owned by specialty funds. Specialty precious metals funds rose +2.70%, China funds +1.31%, Agricultural funds +1.30%, and Base Metals funds +1.12%. While the Courts will decide on the appropriate questions, the markets will collectively reward those who guess right regarding the direction of prices.

 

Please provide any thoughts that might give me a clue on how to avoid losing money and perhaps make some.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Expectations: 3rd 20%+ Gain - Stagflation - Weekly Blog # 896

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Expectations: 3rd 20%+ Gain - Stagflation

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

                             

 

 

 

 

3 ½ Day Trading Week

Normally, in a three and a half-day trading week we expect low volume and muted news of any significance to investors with less intense trading instincts and reduced staff levels. This was not the case this past week. Despite initial unruly Republican Party members in both Congressional houses, the so-called Big Beautiful Bill (BBB) tax and tariff bill passed with few amendments. Significant progress was made on reciprocal tariffs and possible trade barriers. Cease fire agreements in Gaza moved toward peace agreements. One suspects a Russian economic crunch, continued causalities sustained in the homeland, and the US threatening reduced US military aid to Ukraine, could hopefully lead to a reduction in deaths and soon become less of a distraction.

 

Trading Reactions

Led by favorable reactions to the passing of the BBB that were cheered on by The White House, many saw things getting better. These reactions stirred up bullish sentiments resulting in the S&P 500 Index reaching its first high for the year since February. Some even suggested 2025 could be the third +20% gain year in a row, a rare event.

 

Professional analysts and experienced economists are two-handed thinkers who don’t receive the same air or face time that advocates of simple tales do. First, the S&P 500 is a capitalization weighted index with a small number of highly valued stocks recording bigger gains than the average stock. An equally weighted index gained 5% less than the S&P 500. More importantly, at least to me, 9 of the 11 industry sectors in the index underperformed the overall index, with Info Tech and Communications doing better.

 

Economists often turn to the actions of corporate leaders for clues as they feel the stock market is too volatile and occasionally wrong in direction or magnitude. Currently, slightly less than half of publicly traded companies have announced employee layoffs going forward. Considering the cost and time spent getting qualified employees, cutbacks are an expensive strategy companies would like to avoid. Part of their problem is that they can’t find qualified new employees today, which means it is particularly painful to let good ones go. This is particularly true for companies with an aging workforce.

 

The lack of success in finding good new employees while keeping the better aging ones is in my mind not a cyclical problem cured by higher sales levels. It is a secular problem caused by the system we have built, which has failed us by confusing education with schooling. The problem starts in the home, often due to a single adult household, and continues on through early childhood education. The impact is felt all the way through PhD studies, with a system awarding promotions through test taking rather than productivity and intellectual integrity.

 

Historical Lessons

Perhaps we can learn from the past. With that thought in mind I recommend reading this week’s Barron’s article titled “The Coming Stagflation Won’t Feel Like the 70’s” by Joseph Brusuelas. I believe there is another parallel that should be considered, the US with an activist President and an accommodating Congress. Both the current occupant of The White House and FDR came into office seeking to make fundamental changes, but both ran into opposition from the courts. FDR took a recession and turned it into a depression, not by choice but in part due to the impact of stagflation. I do not necessarily agree with Joseph Brusuelas’ statistical projections.

 

What do you Think?      

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Analyst Calendar: Preparation for 2026 - Weekly Blog # 895

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inconclusive Week Hiding a Big Problem - Weekly Blog # 894

Mike Lipper's Blog: We may think we manage time, but time manages us - Weekly Blog # 893

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk - Weekly Blog # 862

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

When Traveling We Often Don’t Know We Are Lost

As a portfolio manager for multi-generational accounts, it is critical to continually focus on the long-term funding needs of accounts, particularly when I am no longer around. In effect we are on a long march, which was part of my training as a USMC officer. (Most of our subscribers will read this blog on the 249th Birthday of The Corps) Rarely does a long march go in a straight line and each turn could be a minor change in direction. Alternatively, it could be a significant change in direction to avoid future danger. At some point a good Marine will recognize that we have passed a critical inflection point.

 

Our fellow investment marchers should be aware of a meaningful change in direction, speed of travel, and a different set of tactical moves. As an officer, it is my duty to consider changes.

 

Recent chatter from various investment pundits suggests there are various “Trump Trades”. Without making a judgement on each suggestion, I am willing to bet a year from now at least half those trades will not have worked out.

 

These trades are based on the 45th President’s actions and campaign comments. I believe no one knows what the 47th President will be able to get accomplished in his first year. We may think we know what he wants to do, but the world has changed both domestically and internationally and he doesn’t know for sure. Based on history, I am concerned about how Congress will follow direction. In many ways, both Chambers of the two major parties are split internally.  Just look at the number of announced caucuses and the potential number of informal voting blocks. Republican majorities in both chambers are likely be under 10 members. Furthermore, the incoming President did not do much to get many members elected. There are a number of Senators who see themselves sitting in The Oval office after the 2028 elections.

 

My portfolio management suggestions for protecting portfolio manager’s jobs are the following:

1. Divide the Trump Trades in half and hold one half for the next year.
2. With the second half, subdivide into twelve equal groups and sell one group each month for the next year.
3. Put the freed-up cash in an equal-weighted S&P 500 index fund if you must be invested, otherwise put the cash in a money market fund.

The above tactic is for short exposure but does not address the real problem.

 

Lack of Competent Leadership is the Problem

As a society Americans have become defensive about their own worth and their jobs. We seek to acquire the credentials that qualified us at some point in time for a particular job, “guaranteeing” that job and income. Once we have the credentials, we no longer need to compete. The longer the elapsed time from when we “earned” the credentials, the less talents we acquire. To offset this deficiency, we lean more on support staff. During WWII it required eight support people for every fighting man (mostly men).

 

This is true not only in the military, but also in medicine, government and schooling. (Note, I didn’t say education.) The larger the staff, the more bureaucratic the control systems get. (A classic example is the Ukrainian fighting people vs the Russian Army.) In general, the more people involved the less efficient the group gets and the longer it takes between promotions.

 

Our so-called educational system (school and university) has molded our workforce since the 1920s. The Communist Party thought that if they could control New York and other school systems they could impact the government, aided by the Depression. The key for union teachers was protecting their jobs by teaching-to-pass exams, both for teachers and students. They were not taught how to think. This strategy was remarkably successful.

 

These teachers trained many of the senior teachers who trained the senior college and university students of today, which explains the political efforts of the majority of teachers today. Trustees and Deans don’t control most of the critical choices of their schools. The faculty senate are the main decision makers, run on a seniority basis.

 

These are the people who are teaching the leaders of today and tomorrow in government, medicine, and business. They tend to favor large organizations, despite most progress in society originating from smaller groups.

 

Inflation is not the Problem

Inflation is society’s way of dealing with imbalances between current supply and demand. Attempts by a top-down government to control the urges of people to balance supply and demand are not useful. Every attempt to control these forces has enlarged grey and black markets, often summoned in regulated and expensive markets. Most supply shortages are due to government regulation for the benefit of friends of the government.

 

In Conclusion

If we have entered a new cycle, we may see a very different set of trends that we will need to understand and master. Any thoughts on how to manage long-term portfolios?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

Mike Lipper's Blog: Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stress Unfelt by the “Bulls”, Yet !! - Weekly Blog # 859

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

This Was The Week That Was,

But Not What Was Expected

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

 “Trump Trade”, An Artifact of History

No one really knows which of the new administration’s critical rules and regulations will become law. Both presidential candidates have announced and unannounced wishes, but both are unlikely to get another term. They will have little ability to help various members of Congress win the ’26 or ’28 elections.

 

Unless there is a one-sided sweep of both Houses for the same party, the odds favor majorities in the single digits. While the rest of the world might think Congressional leaders will be able to command political discipline, both parties are split into multiple groups depending on the particular issue. Furthermore, in the Senate there are members who see themselves sitting in the White House after the ’28 elections.  Looking beyond the intramural games of the next four years, there are two elements of news that should be of importance to those of us selecting assets to meet the needs of longer-term investors.

 

The Declining Dollar

The CFA Institute Research & Policy Center conducted a global survey of 4000 CFAs concerning the future value of the US Dollar. The survey was conducted from 15 to 31 of July 2024. They published their findings in a white paper titled “The Dollar’s Exorbitant Privilege” (This is what the French President called the dollar years ago.)

 

A supermajority of respondents believe that US government spending is not sustainable. Only 59% of US Treasury investors believe the US can continue to borrow using Treasuries. (I remember there was a time when we created a special class of Treasuries for the Saudi Arabia, with an undisclosed interest rate). Neither of the two Presidential Candidates have announced any plans to reduce the deficit and both are unannounced pro-inflation. The respondents expect the dollar to be replaced by a multipolar currency system no later than fifteen years from now.

 

Some investors already recognize the risk in the dollar. Bank of America’s brokerage firm noted this week that 31% of their volume was in gold and 24% in crypto, as a way to reduce total dependence on the dollar. One long-term investor diversifying his currency risk is Warren Buffett. After doubling his money in five Japanese Trading companies, he is now borrowing money in Yen.

 

Berkshire Hathaway’s 10Q

As a young analyst I became enamored by their financial statements, long before I could afford to buy shares in Berkshire. In the 1960s I felt a smart business school could devote a whole semester to reading and understanding the financial reports of Berkshire. It would teach students about equity investments, bonds, insurance, commodities, management analysis, and how politics impacts investment decisions. (It might even help the professors learn about the real world)

 

On Saturday Berkshire published its third quarter results with a relatively concise press release, which was top-line oriented. As is required by the SEC it also published its 10Q document, which was over fifty pages long. Ten of those pages were full of brief comments on each of the larger investments. This is what hooked me, although I could not purchase most of their investments because they are not publicly traded. Their comments were in some detail, covering sales, earnings, taxes paid, expense trends, and management issues. The comments gave me an understanding of how the real economy is working. (Along the way I was able to become comfortable enough to buy some shares in Berkshire, and it is now my biggest investment.)

 

The latest “Q” showed that in nine months they had raised their cash levels to $288 billion, compared to $130 billion at year-end.  At the same time, they added $50 billion to investments. Perhaps most significant was that they did not repurchase any of their own publicly traded stock. A couple of years ago at a private dinner with the late and great Charley Munger, I asked him if I should value their private companies at twice their carrying value (purchase price + dividends received). Charley counseled me that everything they owned currently was not a good investment. As usual he was correct. In this quarter’s “Q” there were a significant number of investments that declining earnings or lost money. (I still believe they own enough large winners on average where doubling their holdings value would be reasonable.) If one looks at the operations of a number of industrial and consumer product entities, they themselves conduct substantial financial activities in terms of loans and insurance.

 

Is Warren Buffett’s Caution Warranted?

Some stocks have risen so high that they may have brought some gains forward, potentially reducing future gains. One way to evaluate this is to look at the gains achieved by the leading mutual fund sectors: Total Return Performance for the latest 52 weeks are shown below:

 

Equity Leverage       61.16%

Financial Services    46.38%

Science & Tech        44.13%

Mid-Cap Growth        41.28%

Large-Cap Growth      40.30%

 

I don’t expect all to be leaders in the next 52 weeks, as the three main indices (DJIA, SPX, and the Nasdaq Composite) have “Head & Shoulders” chart patterns, which often leads to a reversal.

 

Question: What Do You Think?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stress Unfelt by the “Bulls”, Yet !! - Weekly Blog # 859

Mike Lipper's Blog: Melt-Up, Leaks, & Echoes of 1907 - Weekly Blog # 858

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Detective Work of Analysts - Weekly Blog # 847

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Detective Work of Analysts

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

Similarities

Good professional securities analysts are not captives of media pundits or most salespeople. They often build their analyses using small details from obscure sources. This is the approach I use each week in preparing the blog. I gather bits of information for a myriad of sources to build a collection of factoids, some of which may be true and useful.

 

What follows is this week’s collection, separated into come-to-mind file folders which are easy to discard.

 

Market Clues

Citigroup regularly produces market judgements that rely on their own data and other indicators. Most interesting to me is their prediction for specific dates a year in the future. They also study their past guesses and claim to be accurate 80% of the time. This is surprising!

 

As has been noted several times in these blogs, I learned analysis at the New York racetracks where the favorites win about half the time, pre-tax and pre-expenses. In my study of professional securities analysts touting their records when seeking employment, their lifetime success ratios are rarely in the mid-60s% when adjusted for appropriate expenses and taxes. There are a number that have very commendable records because they hold winning combinations for a long time, keeping their investments at work.

 

This adjustment to performance data is critical in comparing investment returns. Quite a number of investment returns in the second quarter were single digit results. However, many investors look only at longer returns where results are generally positive.

 

Misreading Performance Data

Like many analysts I look at the weekly summary survey data from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). They survey their members to get their market outlook for the next six months, indicating whether they are bullish, bearish, or neutral. This latest week 43.2% were bullish and 31.7% were bearish. This satisfied the bulls and other pundits. The week prior the bullish count was 52.7% and the bearish count was 23.4%. Comparing the two weeks I see a flashing yellow caution light. Professional market analysts consider any reading over 50% unsustainable, but of real concern was the unnerving 29.3% spread between the bulls and bears. The spread for the current week was a little more normal at 11.5%.

 

The decline in the bull/bear spread may be a fluke, or a meaningful signal that the bulls were too enthusiastic. The political news may have created the flip. Chatting with institutional investors, they believe the election is not yet a significant enough factor to cause a change in investment exposure.

 

One of the rising stock groups has been the banks who expect their “NIM” (Net Investment Margin) to be higher in 2025, either because of lower rates increasing demand for loans, or rates being higher and loan demand being enforced.

 

Why Are Interest so High?

No one wants to accept the responsibility for interest rates, not the executive branch nor Congress. Washington plays the game of taking credit for “good things” and avoids being tagged with “bad things”. A number of years ago Congress was able to shift responsibility to the Federal Reserve via its Second Mandate of controlling the level of prices using short-term interest rates, their major weapon. These rates are part of the cost package individuals and companies must deal with. The Fed does not control labor costs, quantities, quality, global trade, or the rate of innovation and invention. The partnership of the Executive and The Executive and Congress control these items, with only the Supreme Court beyond. This partnership has managed these factors since colonial times, particularly at election time. COVID proved to be an excellent time to target the expected vote with money, paying little attention to the inflationary impacts of excess money creation.

 

Tariffs as a Tax Collector

The founding fathers did not have an efficient way to get money to pay for their   war and peace expenses. They adopted the European approach of raising money through tariffs and paid their bills this way for many years. Later, the Internal Revenue Service was able to collect income taxes. By the 1920s tariffs were a less important part of government. Farmers, businesses, and people borrowed money in the twenties, creating high spending and debt. Herbert Hoover, a conservative President, was talked into signing the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, which hurt the sales of farm goods and damaged farmers and farm focused banks. This led to other countries going into depressions and was a cause of WWI. As both presidential candidates display a lack of understanding of economics, we could well repeat the global problems of the 1930s.

 

What One Can Learn from Chocolate?

One of the repeated lessons from Chocolate is that European commodity players like trading Cocoa because of its low margin requirements and high fluctuations. The players periodically got wiped out and attempted to recoup their losses in the coffee market, which is bigger.

 

With that as a background and my unintended ownership in Nestle, I was fascinated by their management accounting. They developed an approach where they created “Real Internal Growth” (RIG). This number excludes price changes and interest rate fluctuations in determining real demand for their products. Currently, they see a shift in demand to cheaper lines for both chocolate products and pet food. (Walmart and Amazon have noted similar consumer reactions.)

 

Working Conclusion:

The financial world is seeing a different future than the real world of the consumer.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Our Self-Appointed Mission - Weekly Blog # 846

Mike Lipper's Blog: We are Never Fully Prepared - Weekly Blog # 845

Mike Lipper's Blog: What I See and Perceive By Observing - Weekly Blog # 844

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

American Voters Win & Lose - Weekly Blog # 830

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

American Voters Win & Lose

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

   

    

Probable Real Winner in November

While it is unknown which candidate will be elected President, the probable real winner is the American voter. Unfortunately, victory comes at the price of worse government.

 

In almost every poll taken, it is clear most voters are unenthusiastic about the numerical winner. If the number of unenthusiastic and non-voters were aggregated, they would likely represent the majority of the country. For all intents and purposes, based on todays’ perceptions, the occupant of the White House will be a “lame duck”. The President will have limited influence on those occupying seats in Congress for 2026 and 2028. As most Americans prefer Congress pass very little legislation, they are the likely winners in 2024.

 

However, the voters are also losers. While members of Congress will either wear red or blue uniforms, but in meeting rooms they will split into numerous caucuses. As the number of voting groups goes up, compromises will produce the weakest bills. More importantly, none of the splinter groups will have national campaign chests or the talent of the national committees. Odds are the US structure will look similar to  the less efficient European Parliaments. A factor likely to slow international agreements.

 

Chairman Powell Attempts to Teach Economics

In the press conference following Chairman Powell’s testimony before the Houses of Congress, he indicated that interest rates are unlikely to be the main weapon used to bring down inflation. Furthermore, he said it is possible the “Fed” is likely to raise interest rates under certain conditions.

 

This pronouncement came as a rude shock to those viewing control of short-term interest rates as controlling inflation and the economy. The Board of the Federal Reserve System made it unanimously clear that the causes of inflation are multifaceted and that control of short-term high-quality rates would not control inflation.

 

The rate of inflation is an inexact measure of the rate of change in prices, as there are many influences on the aggregate level of price changes. These influences can be ranked and put into three broad groups, governments, private sectors, and natural forces.

 

Their impact on inflation is not well-understood. Too much attention is focused on government-imposed income taxes. Also important are business taxes, estate formation and related taxes, and regulations of permitted actions. Additionally, State, Municipal, and foreign taxes can also be inflationary. Changes in demographics, climate, technology, and wars also have an impact, which is beyond the purview of the Fed and Congress. While there are a few more narrowly focused inflation measures, they are not generally used in making decisions. Bottomline, inflation should not be treated as a single number of any precision.     

 

News That May Impact Security Prices

1. 16 states still have employment rates below pandemic levels, with New York and California leading the list.
2. We don’t measure the flight from the US dollar correctly, as we don’t include the purchase of Bitcoin, Gold, Manhattan Real Estate, and other hard commodities requiring the exchange of dollars.
3. Narrowing high yield spreads.
4. EPS growth leveraging revenue growth.
5. The ratio of AAII Bullish views to Bearish is near a record 2.2 times.
6. Private Capital is short of opportunities and talented staff.
7. Defaults are expected to grow.
8. Trading liquidity to dry up with a switch to smaller caps.

           

Please share your reactions so we can learn.                                              

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fragments Prior to Fragmentation - Blog 829

Mike Lipper's Blog: Collateral Rewards, Risks, & Opportunities - Weekly Blog # 828

Mike Lipper's Blog: Alternative Futures - Weekly Blog # 827

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Fragments Prior to Fragmentation - Blog 829

 

      

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Fragments Prior to Fragmentation

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

 

 

Historic + Military Learning

Some have said, if you scratch a good security analyst a historian will bleed. If you add in two other variables, learning from military training and exposure to the racetrack, you will understand much of my thinking. In fearing World War III, one should start with the German General Staff study of the American Civil War and the Peace efforts prior to and post WWI. Long periods of relative peace can be achieved most of the time if intelligent leaders continue to plan for economic and military hostilities.

 

Since we don’t know what the future will bring, we should study every fragment of information available and track developments that might lead to dangerous conflicts. Few peacetime leaders are equipped to be successful war leaders, and often they make war inevitable. I believe a lesson from one of the various “war colleges” is that war is another way to conduct political change. Our political leaders increasingly use an “anything goes" approach to cling to power, ignoring the vulnerabilities they are exposing for our adversaries to exploit.   

 

In retrospect, it has become increasingly clear that WWI and WWII were inevitable. The threat of nuclear war and some of our world leadership has held off WWIII, hopefully forever. Due to improvement in tactical nuclear and other weapons, there is greater risk today than in the past. We need to review all fragments as they appear and be watchful of those which could harm us.

 

Dangerous Fragments Past & Present

In the 1920s, the general urban population looked askance at criminal controlled bootlegging but enjoyed the local speakeasies. Today’s version of this attitude is the general disrespect for most members of Congress. Although they continue to support their local representatives, or for the younger set, the local ‘pusher”. We seem reluctant to reform our own process of offering debt forgiveness in the hope of gaining votes. They don’t seem to see these stimulants as bribes, much like the circuses that led to the fall of the Roman empire.  

 

Daily Stock Markets React to Central Banks Words

On Thursday, 27 % of the “Big Board” stocks declined, with 38% falling on the NASDAQ. The next day, 64% of NYSE issues fell, with 63% falling on the NASDAQ. The only difference was many traders finally believed the clues given regarding the possible number of interest rate cuts this year. (They paid no attention to the view that the next rate move by the Fed could be up.) Most of the time investors stay focused on their long-term needs and don’t react to politicians and pundits.

 

Fragmentation Becoming More Popular

On many days more stocks go up than down. This week, 21 of the 28 foreign markets Barron’s tracks rose. However, in the US only the momentum index has gained double digits over the last two months.

 

What is the Remaining Upside Left?

While it is popular for market leaders to mention their gains from the  bottom, the payoff for today’s investor is what is left? Jeremy Grantham, Chair of GMO, has generally held a bearish view but has generated good long-term performance for the funds he supervises. He mentions that if one uses the Shiller P/E, the market is in the top 1% of its history. A more significant observation is that many analysts use both P/E and profit margin, which are linked, so they are double counting. (Profits = Earnings, which is the driver of margins)

 

Today’s Parallels with WWI And WWII

Russia is in fighting a war in Eastern Europe, with Western Europe supporting the locals. The US is in a trade war with China and is constraining trade. Our opposition is getting stronger, although we are having trouble convincing people that they need to fight. This reluctance exposes our current weakness to our adversaries, giving them reason to cheer.

 

The markets generally seem to be ignoring the geopolitical hot spots accumulating around the world. There seems to be a perception that we can ignore these problems as they are occurring in some distant land. However, these problems are now surfacing closer to home and their citizens are increasingly arriving at our borders and making their way into the country. The situation is putting significant strain on resources and budgets, at a time when pet projects are already being funded in the hope of attracting the support of an expectant electorate. This spending is unsustainable in the long-term and creates additional vulnerabilities for our adversaries to exploit.  

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Collateral Rewards, Risks, & Opportunities - Weekly Blog # 828

Mike Lipper's Blog: Alternative Futures - Weekly Blog # 827

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bullish Chatter Leaves Out Useful Info - Weekly Blog # 826

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Reactions from a Contrarian - Weekly Blog # 814

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Reactions from a Contrarian

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Surprises Pay More Than Consensus

Consensus, when right, is not highly rewarded. Contrarians are correct less than consensus suggests but they receive greater rewards. Over time, the bigger winners start out by being relative loners. With these guidelines, I review my reactions to media comments. (Remember, my absolute right to be wrong.)

 

The Indices are at yearly highs; therefore, we have entered a “bull market.”  Not necessarily! In some cases, these are not all-time highs. Additionally, the indices need to be measured in the most valuable currency in order to enter a new market cycle. Trading volumes are also not impressive. We live in a global world with the US dollar declining, so we ought to adjust the peaks and valleys accordingly.

 

Possibly the best summary of market moves comes from Bank of America, which describes it as emotionally bullish but intellectually bearish.

 

When the Fed pivots it will be a seminal event. Possibly, but odds are it will be late. For those predicting a pivot, they are like football fans calling the pivot wrong six times in a row. They could be right, but their odds are no better than 50/50.

 

There are at least three other reasons to question the timing of an interest rate cut.

1. The original ignition of the inflation fire was caused by the Administration pouring an excessive amount of cash into consumer’s hands and restricting domestic trade.
2. Congress pushed the responsibility for full employment to a bunch of financial economists at the Fed, which led to it becoming politicized.
3. Most importantly, the largest factor in the US economy is not the production of goods, it is services. In general, service providers don’t need to borrow money for capital expenditures and inventory.

 

Current Market Focus Does Not Address Long-Term Problems

Almost all the attention of market participants is focused on short-term events, which are expected to determine short-term results. Media performance reporting on minute by minute, day by day, week by week, and year by year results view this as the only essential reality. These short timeframes are essentially important to traders, but of little value to long-term investors.

 

Most money invested in the market is for retirement, or longer. The assumption ought to be that the average worker probably still has 25 years before retirement and a somewhat similar period in retirement. Many institutions can have indefinite lives. Thus, the things that are really important to these investors are actions impacting the long-term progress of their assets and liabilities.

 

One of the reasons good analysts and portfolio managers study history is to get an understanding of market cycles, which are caused by insufficient supply of goods and services in the minds of consumers and investors, followed by periods of too much excessive production. These trends take a long to very long time to evolve. However, their terminal stages often occur swiftly and rarely reverse.

 

Three Trends That Hurt Investors

1. Political skills are paramount over operating skills. Most large organizations are comprised of collections of people with different backgrounds and strengths. Those who rise to the top are most often chosen for their political skills, with less attention paid to their operating and investment skills. These leaders recognize that their positions have finite termination dates, so their decision process is relatively short-term, with little regard for long-term implications.
2. The costs of developing and maintaining military strength reduces the available supply for other funding. There are a relatively small number of nations with significant power. The US has historically cut military spending sharply during “peace time”, as it tends to fall behind the ambitions of autocrats. Considering the current crop of political leaders and their tendency to cut military spending after inflation. Today there is no large military power that has any respect for the current US power base. They however recognize our potential, much like Germany and Japan did prior to WWII, making the world an increasingly less safe place. The leaders of Western Europe recognize that they cannot defend themselves. One leading expert believes that Germany needs 30 years to build its own independent force to safely defend Germany.
3. By far the biggest threat to the US, both commercially and militarily, is our youth. Based on global test comparisons, US students rank below mid-point in math and not close to the top in reading and science. Remember, we probably have the most expensive educational system in the world. To protect professors the US government measures academic college success over six years. In the UK, the normal college period is three years.

 

 Other Items of Concern

1. John Authers, now at Bloomberg and formerly with the Financial Times, believes that we should expect US defaults, particularly of regional banks.  Altman Z scores are the lowest since 1987.
2. China has stopped publishing youth unemployment data. (This habit of putting out just positives raises more questions than answers.)

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: 3 Senior Lessons + Upsetting Parallel - Weekly Blog # 813

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Cyclical World + Consistent Results - Weekly Blog # 812

Mike Lipper’s Blog: Recognizing a Professional: Ratings vs Ranking – Weekly Blog # 811

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.