What Can Go Wrong - Weekly Blog # 940

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What Can Go Wrong

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Preface

In preparing to start a buying program using one of the lessons from betting at the track you should recognize what could go wrong. The purpose of this blog is not to permit betting, but to avoid wagering on one’s ego and failing to learn from the experience.

 

There are four general reasons for not seeing an opportunity as a trap.

1. Not appreciating the goals of the source.
2. Inaccurate data or badly displayed data.
3. Failing to process past mistakes.
4. Too difficult to fathom. (Probably the least in terms of occurrence)

 

Tocqueville, as quoted by Goldman Sachs who deals well with errors. “The greatness of America lies not being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather her ability to repair her faults.” Therefore, I view betting on horses, securities, politics, people, and many other things, as learning experiences.

 

Sources of Mistakes

We all have deeply felt biases. The media and their chorus of pundits use information to motivate repeat use of their work. Thus, they transmit their pronouncements in the way we would like to read, see, or hear. For example, in the latest announcements of the number of people hired, it was better than many expected compared to the prior, shorter month, with bad weather. Deep in the article was the fact that it was not better than the same month last year. Furthermore, if you deduct healthcare and social assistance workers from the total employed, there has been no growth since 2024. Why is this important? The latter group receives payments from the federal government, either directly or indirectly, which will likely have some impact on the midterm elections.

 

This is probably a major reason for the various market indices going up. Using the data for this week only, 2/3rds of the stocks advanced and 1/3rd did not. Even on Friday, there was little focus on the number of new unemployment claims, which rose for the week. There was little coverage of the consumer sentiment survey by the University of Michigan, which hit a new low.

 

When companies release layoff numbers, they are vague and rounded. What disturbs me is that these are some of the most numeric-driven companies: Fidelity, Deloitte, and Commerzbank, all of which announced cutbacks. For some time, established financial and auditing firms around the world have been retiring senior people without hiring replacements. Even some “AI” people have been let go.

 

One of the most dangerous items of news is a shortage of an industry’s goods followed by a new large supply becoming available. Historically, look at what happened to the price of gold when the size of the Latin American precious metal was announced. While it made Spain wealthy, it hurt the other European nations with lots of gold in their vaults. So be careful if quantities jump up while simultaneously being withdrawn.

 

What We Should Have Learned?

Perhaps we should have learned from recorded history the need to negotiate debts payments, date, and rate! Examples include the Babylonians, William Shakespeare’s “Merchant of Venus”, the expansion and depression of the 1920s and 1930s, or even the present occupant of the White House.  

 

Almost every sector in the commercial world has added debt as their currency for expansion. This is one reason to keep an eye on the slowdown in ROTCE (Return on Total Capital Employed). Bearing in mind that this sum does not cover accidents and supply chain issues adequately.

 

Please let me know what you think I can learn. 

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Weekend’s Learning Sources - Weekly Blog # 939

Mike Lipper's Blog: Watch Out for the Four - Weekly Blog # 938

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors’ Interlude - Weekly Blog # 937

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

  

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

To Win Long-Term,

Learn From Great Presidents

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Losing is Part of Winning

In the US, we celebrate Presidents Day on Monday. A typical US compromise that solved an immediate political problem and ignored the long-term implications that would have benefited all, particularly investors. Numerous Americans wanted to celebrate the birthdays of two of our greatest presidents, George Washington, and Abraham Lincoln. However, perhaps for economic reasons the political leadership decided to celebrate just one date, picking neither President’s birthday but continuing to support the travel and retail shopping industries by requiring Presidents Day always be celebrated on a Monday.

 

What these politicians lost in their efforts were critical learning experiences. In terms of opposed contests, both leaders lost more than they won. Washington in military battles and Lincoln in elections. Unlike many of us, they learned from these defeats. (As Warren Buffett said, losing is part of winning.)

 

Applying Learned Experiences to Portfolios

I learned a lot at the racetrack, but my objective was to finish with more money than I started. Washington wanted the rebellion to survive and by so doing he would force the superior power to concede defeat. (The British marched out of Yorktown to the tune “The World Turned Upside Down”.) Lincoln preserved the Union. Both Presidents needed selective reserves to accomplish their goals.

 

Applying these lessons to portfolios, I am a believer in taking risks on individual investments but avoiding the risk of a complete wipe out. In a study of million-dollar retirement accounts at Fidelity, the winning results used both stocks and bonds. I would rename the components equity risk and interest rate/survival risk.  

 

What I found interesting was the median account allocation of 70% stocks and 30% bonds for these millionaires.  Currently, I have about 70% in funds/direct equities and 30% in reserves, with about half of that in cash or bonds/notes under two-year duration.

 

The Logic Behind a 70/30 Portfolio

Looking through a collection of portfolios over time and dividing them into 10-year performance slices, it appears 80% of the equity slices go up in value. As a fiduciary, I assume a more conservative approach with the 70% equity risk.

 

I consider the overall portfolio to be a 20/20 portfolio, with the “normal” equity risk assumption being 70%. This permits market movements of 20% in either direction, without needing to change the basic balance. On the downside, if the portfolio balance reaches a point of having only 50% in equities, I would add 10% of capital to equities. On the upside, once equities reach 90%. I would rebuild a 10% optimistic reserve.

 

Not Built in Yet

We live and invest in a multi-speed world. Due to electronic processing most commercial and agricultural world price trends are impacted at an increasingly fast speed. Some of these trends reflect fast reactions to price movements, which cause geographic rotation. Through last Thursday on a year-to-date basis the S&P 500 generated a -0.07% loss and is essentially flat, with Europe gaining +4.51%, Japan +13.96%, Australia +3.8%, and Canada in local currency +2.56%. In most of these countries there are local and multi-national producers who experience similar problems of prices representing different costs, size-weighted efficiencies, local preferences, and legal/tax regulatory differences. Customers and investors are quick to rotate their actions.

 

On a longer-term basis the world is going through a period of declining fertility rates, impacting local demand in the short term. On a longer-term basis there will be fewer workers, which will result in retirement capital being reduced and securities markets altered. Organizations active in the markets are changing. On the one hand there is a desire to become bigger and serve more firms and people, while others want to increase profitability and remain small enough to grow profits per key player.

 

As populations age, they become more expensive to maintain, particularly beyond their working ages.

 

In Conclusion:

We should all learn from George Washington and Abraham Lincoln and adapt to change with sufficient humility, so we don’t become bystanders passed in the fast parade hurtling through.

 

Thoughts?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

Mike Lipper's Blog

Mike Lipper's Blog: Failed Expectations: Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips - Weekly Blog # 925

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Stock Markets Becoming More Difficult - Weekly Blog # 841

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Stock Markets Becoming More Difficult

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Picking a portfolio of currently attractive stocks is becoming more difficult around the world, both for the portfolio managers and business managers. This is emphasized by the media’s attention on popular indices, where a small number of stocks are driving performance. The media, marketers, and unsophisticated investors chatter about “The market”. However, today there are multiple sub-markets within the entire universe of available stocks.

 

The job of a good portfolio manager is to carefully select individual securities or funds. No single account should be identical to another. Even if the two started out identical, over time cash flows will create differences.

 

There is a fundamental problem with what most scribes write about securities, as most significant differences result from key critical elements. I will discuss the way the late and great Charley Munger and Warren Buffett might discuss a particular investment. (Both our clients and me personally own shares in Berkshire Hathaway.)

 

Large Caps on the NYSE

Product producers and marketeers are responsible for the bulk of large-cap volume. They are fabricators who repackage raw materials into useable products. The better ones have skills in both purchasing and selling. Currently, the overall stock market view is that many of these product producing companies are in pre-recession mode. New orders are falling behind current deliveries. The market reflects this, with 77% of stock transactions on the NYSE executed on declining prices this past week. By contrast, only 58% of the stocks traded on the NASDAQ were executed on falling prices. In contrast to NYSE companies the NASDAQ has more service-oriented companies, many of which are at an earlier part of their cycle. Furthermore, many of these companies are led by their founders or other entrepreneurs. Typically, Berkshire Hathaway buys companies with good management and keeps them in place. Larger-cap companies rotate some of their managers in training, hoping they will get useful experience at totally managing an enterprise. This experience helps prepare them for similar opportunities at the parent company. Even division heads often lack responsibility for the full business.

 

Playing the Players on the Fast Track

Each week the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) surveys a sample of their members to get their outlook for the stock market over the next six months. In earlier years I suspect the respondents were relatively conservative senior citizens with meaningful portfolios. In some case they were active investors.

 

Having attended a number of meetings with unidentified “wealth managers” trolling for clients. Professionals pay attention to the weekly numbers for two reasons. The first is their belief in the public always being late. (In truth the long-term record of the public is pretty good, although they are weak at peaks and bottoms.) A second reason is that some professionals want to hear from the “public” to catch the beginning of a trend.

 

This week the bullish members had a meaningful jump to 44.65%, after two weeks at 39%. Bearish readings for the last three weeks were 25.7%, 33.0%, and 26.7%. Most of the time Munger and Buffett buy into a declining price pattern over time.

 

Capital Utilization

Berkshire and a small number of others have generated more capital than they can wisely use in their operating businesses. Today it is more difficult to wisely put capital to work due to the high prices of good properties, and short-term interest rates in the 5.25% to 5.50% range.

What attracted their investment in the past was a good manager looking to add a new aspect to their business. Some of their recent investments in energy were this type of investment. These investments did not result in increased capacity, they were preferably a uniquely new project with a good margin when developed.

 

Business Economics vs. GAAP Accounting

Evaluating what a knowledgeable buyer would pay for a position in the marketplace. Long-term potential earnings power at the bottom of an economic cycle vs correct judgement of a fashionable product. As an example, for years car buyers were attracted to the newest looking cars and during that phase car producers were in the fashion business, particularly if they had creative advertising. This was of no interest to the two leaders of Berkshire, who were more interested in longer term control of critical supply chains. GAAP accounting was of no great value in Real Estate and Pharma. In both cases, winning investments were not what is present, but what they will be.

 

The Investment Game is Changing

There are now a large number of new CEOs and I expect an even larger number over the next five years. Additionally, the structure of the investment sector is changing. For example, Fidelity is attempting to get a fee from ETFs sold through Fidelity’s brokerage desks. If they don’t get it from the ETFs they will likely attempt to introduce a service charge paid by their accounts.

 

It is conceivable that growth in the number of companies moving their headquarters and tax status to Texas will result in substantial growth in listings at the newly formed Texas Stock Exchange. This is already causing national accounting and law firms to beef up or open Texas offices.

 

In the past, the custodian function was considered a good business. But as this activity has become concentrated in a few multi-national organizations, it has become difficult to sell smaller custodian firms. When Ford Motor went public, the tombstone included a very large number of brokerage firms. Most of those names have disappeared, with some merging out while others just went out of business. We have seen the same thing happening to regional stock exchanges, where very few of the remaining exchanges have a trading floor. Instead, there are a computer networks dominated by a few firms. When the next structural recession occurs, it is my guess fewer organizations will be left in business. In the second quarter of 2024, a number of brokerage firms, stock exchanges, and investment advisors are losing revenue momentum.

 

P L E A S E   S H A R E   Y O U R   T H O U G H T S

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Transactional Signals - Weekly Blog # 840

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Markets are Fragmenting - Weekly Blog # 839

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Rhyme Curse -Weekly Blog # 838

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Avoiding Many Mistakes - Weekly Blog # 834

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Avoiding Many Mistakes

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

Numbers Are Not the Answer, Questions Are

This is the season of the year when investment managers are often chosen. This is particularly true now, with US stock market leadership evolving. There is a debate between the short-term attraction of growth and fundamental long-term concerns over the global economy and political structure. We may have entered the early stage of replacing current leadership in business and in Washington. Because the future appears uncertain, group decisions through committee are more likely. (A historic lesson from military and political history is the larger the group, the less dynamic the decision.)

 

The first step in making an investment discussion is often to gather the easily available numbers. The first problem with gathering numbers is the motivation of the sources. In the investment arena, the major providers are groups who wish to publish data for direct or indirect sale and/or profit. Another source is regulators who wish to provide standards leading to evidence for lawsuits. Neither of these sources try to help others make wise investment decisions.

 

At this point in my professional life and practice, I am trying to make informed and correct investment decisions for specific users, including my family and myself. The following discussion are some of the indicia I use to ask some of the right questions.

 

Critical Questions in Search for Profitable Investments

1. Rarely the first question and more likely the last, is understanding the motivation of important individuals involved on a personal and group basis. Different answers should be expected depending on whether the mindset is one of a publicly traded investor or a sole ownership, and all gradations in between.
2. Obtain quarterly performance since inception for at least ten years, or shorter if there was a significant change of individuals or operating philosophy.
3. Understand the choice of perceived peers and their performance for the period where their critical philosophy and personnel were in place.
4. Get the percentage of time the investment occupies in each quintile. If potential investors are satisfied with mid-quintile performance, eliminate all candidates who don’t have 75% of their results in the 3^rd quintile. If the account is a significant turnaround buyer, focus on managers with 25-50% in the 4^th and 5^th quintile. (This is based on the reaction of many investors to the pain of losing, which is felt twice as much as gaining an equal amount. If the pain multiple is higher e.g. 4x, the loss tolerance level will be lower, perhaps as low as 13% or in the range of only five quarters out of 50.) If the buyer insists on avoiding problems, screen for a manager that has performance primarily in the second quintile, but no more than 25% in top quintile.)
5. Voting members of the committee, are they making choices or reaffirming choices made?
6. How important are inputs from marketing/sales and trading? Who are the top 10 brokers and top 10 marketers for the organization?
7. Recalculate the published turnover of the portfolio to include the greater of sales & purchases. (The SEC mandated measure is based on the smaller, because of their concern for “churning”. Identify the major sources of inflow and withdrawals? From the portfolio perspective, how much of sales is replacement of positions and how much stems from disappointments?
8. What are the management responsibilities of the portfolio manager and who does he/she report to? Can he describe his personal and major family portfolios?

 

Items of Interest you may have missed.

1. Daniel Henninger wrote a column in Thursday’s WSJ titled “The Counter-Revolt Begins”. He lists a number of instances where decidedly left leaning communities have passed local regulations and laws to bring back some safety to their cities and states. These include San Francisco, Los Angeles, the District of Columbia, and the states of Oregon and New York. Wealthy university donors are also insisting on changes.
2. The global financial community is consolidating as intra-industry acquisitions occur. Computershare is buying BNY Trust Company of Canada. Several top financial advisors at JP Morgan also left in a single day.
3. PGIM of Prudential is following the trend and has applied to the SEC for a new class of Exchange Traded Fund shares for their mutual funds. They are following DFA, Morgan Stanley, and Fidelity. (This may bring more money into the ETF industry. It answers one of my concerns for redeeming ETFs in thin markets.  A surge in bond and small-cap redemptions on a crisis day can be helped by accessing the open-end fund’s resources. Until Vanguard’s patent protection expired, it was the only fund group that could do this.
4. All 32 global equity market indices rose this week.
5. AAII publishes bullish, bearish, and neutral indices from a sample survey of their members market views six-months out. They show rare confusion in the retail market this week, where all three numbers were in the 32-33 range.
6. Also, Copper prices are often referred to as Dr Copper because the metal is used in so many products. Copper has been used as a type of currency in some countries with limited or expensive markets for dollars. This week’s copper prices were near an all-time high.

 

As always, I am searching for good thoughts from bright people such as you.   

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: News & Reactions - Weekly Blog # 833

Mike Lipper's Blog: Better Investment Thinking - Weekly Blog # 832

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing for the Future - Weekly Blog # 831

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.          

Alternative Futures - Weekly Blog # 827

 

      

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Alternative Futures

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

 

       

Could the Future be Better?

While most stock indices are rising, most bond indices are falling.  Normally, fixed income investors are more risk aware than future oriented stock buyers and owners. Some near-term economic indices are rising, while public company managers are laying workers off. (Each worker is an investment of the company, which represents a reinvestment cost if eventually replaced.) Why is this happening when current sales are reasonably acceptable? To many businesspeople, their next planning period look bleak, despite what many political leaders say.

 

The current President is rushing into the 1930s FDR future. This has been magnified by an employment shortage in the prior engine of world trade growth, China. The general assumption in the US is that the current leadership won’t change.

 

 Will it be a Presidential election or one determining the leadership of the two Houses of Congress? According to Nikki Haley, 70% of voters are unhappy with the current candidates likely to lead their tickets. On day one in their next office, they will both be lame ducks. The Presidential term is 4 years, whereas the senate term is 6 years, and they often serve more than a single term. There is considerable evidence that a significant number of voters will decide to stay home on election day. Within each party the centrists tend to be the people not expected to vote. This will magnify the voting power of fringe voters. This was the reason the “State of the Union” speech was directed at tarnishing the other party, rather than at lauding the accomplishments of the party in power. (If this creates a “Nixon moment in the White House it could lead to both leading candidates being replaced. Kim Strassel of The Wall Street Journal said, “Both presumptive presidential nominees are so weak that they’d lose to virtually anyone else”)

Perhaps more important to the world is the statement by Xi, the paramount, but not sole leader of China. He is advocating “High Quality Development” = National Security, Political Stability, and Social Equality. With 90% of the population in the private sector, the level of employment is critical for stability. (China has a history of rebellions starting in the south, with some succeeding in changing the government. Their military posture is more defensive than offensive. However, their defense budget increased 7.2%, which does not include the 30-35% spending on science and space.

 

Other Items of Significance

• Fidelity International announced a layoff of 9% of its global workforce.
• AAII sample survey shows 51.7% bulls vs 21.8% bears, which is an extreme contrarian reading.

  

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bullish Chatter Leaves Out Useful Info - Weekly Blog # 826

Mike Lipper's Blog: Caution: This Time Is Different - Weekly Blog # 825

Mike Lipper's Blog: What Moves the Stock Market? - Weekly Blog # 824

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Not Yet! - Weekly blog # 800

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Not Yet!

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

The Thinking Behind Blog 800

When I realized the 800^th blog was coming up I tried to think of something special to discuss, like a critical turning point at the beginning of a new long-term market cycle. I see a turning point in the future which will begin a new corrective cycle. It will address multiple imbalances facing the US stock market, a reflection of increasingly problematic domestic and global problems.

 

However, it now appears we are likely going more toward a shallow dip, which could be labeled either a “soft landing” or a ripple in a stagflation period. Regardless, the underlying tensions continue to build and they will eventually lead to a deep corrective stage. With the 100^th blog less than 4 full years away, I have high confidence we will see a major correction.

 

Regardless of the timing and depth of the correction, we remain largely invested in equities and stock funds. These funds will need guiding principles to survive the correction and prosper from the following “bull” market.

 

Sources of My Guidelines for Long-Term Successful Investing

• Fidelity has published their views on 5 mega trends.
• Marathon in London has written about the benefits of low turnover and stable managements.
• Howard Marks expressed his views on escaping extreme investing.
• Finally, my own observations on the investment decisions of funds, commuters, and actuarial lessons on betting.

 

Productivity/Profits- Fidelity

Fidelity probably invests in almost every investment any place in the world. They serve different types of clients in many capacities and countries. Of the 5 Mega Emerging Trends, the most easily measured is the slowdown in the growth of productivity, more specifically in the productivity of labor. Labor is easily measured in terms of the number of hours committed to work, likely for compensation. (What is not evaluated is the quality of the work.) The number of hours worked in the US is in the upper portion of the lower half as shown below:

   More than US      US    Less than US

UAE          2709  1892   UK        1866

India        2480         Germany   1783

China        2392         Australia 1669

Mexico       2220         Canada    1664

South Africa 2154         France    1565 

Thailand     2108

Poland       2085

Indonesia    2043  

Philippines  2039  

Russia       1965

 

Implications

1. In a world that has higher interest rates and is short of opportunities, there are more places competitive with the US.
2. When US proclaims politically motivated holidays, such as Labor Day.

 

In an article by Howard Marx, he warns about extreme stock prices. When extreme enthusiasm pushes prices to record highs or lows, investors sell stocks priced for perfection, or buy/retain stocks which can never generate good news. Most of the time securities trend in one direction or the other. A dangerous condition is when all opinions on a security are totally one-sided. Very few investors understand that it is rare for there to be no salvage value for knowledgeable investors with patience and legal backing.

 

An example of too many one-sided beliefs was the 50 institutionally favored stocks in the early 1970s (Nifty Fifty). It was believed that these stocks could be bought and never sold, after the recommendations of the leading institutional brokerage houses didn’t work out. In 1972 the list contained Eastman Kodak, Polaroid, Sears, and Kresge. In the years that followed, all four disappeared through bankruptcy. To demonstrate how much reputational power these stocks had. One senior investment officer was an early promoter of Polaroid and managed to ride that performance into being hired as the senior investment officer at a New York based mutual fund house. He didn’t last long in a company that was studied daily, including its longer-term performance.

 

Marathon in London has a successful record with its European fund and others. They are a low portfolio turnover shop who pay a lot of attention to industrial and corporate capital cycles and meet with long-term senior management extensively. They are very proud of the 26% of their portfolio that has been held for more than 10 years in the European fund. Those positions represented 45% of that portfolio at the end of the period. When I visited them, I was amazed at their detailed knowledge of their companies, managements, and critical competitive information.

 

There are many investment lessons I have learned from just observing and listening to people. For example, I suspected the market was getting frothy in the late 1960s when a person I commuted with on a 6 AM train mentioned he had gotten a personal computer and was going to stay home and day trade a handful of stocks. He was a mid-level executive at a famous financial institution and appeared to have average intelligence. I was working for a firm that had a very active trading desk that regularly dealt with some of the sharpest trading shops. Very occasionally I heard one-side of a phone conversation between the traders. I felt I needed a translation regarding their words and tactics. I am sure my former train buddy knew no more than I did about institutional trading. Hopefully he learned quickly or found a new job. I never saw him on the train again.

 

I owe UPS a gift for the two investment lessons I learned from them this week. There was a public announcement that the company was offering early retirement to 167 senior pilots. Each of their planes carries about 30,000 packages and is designed to fly every day. Consequently, in terms of delivery capacity, it meant UPS would deliver 1.8 billion fewer packages or these packages would be flown by less expensive junior pilots. It suggested to me that UPS was expecting less business after their expensive settlement with their truck drivers. Within the week our friendly regular UPS driver delivered some low value drug store items, which may have come from a warehouse or a local store under half mile away. In either case, it was not a bullish indicator for me.

 

During the very same period institutions were locking into long-term investing in the nifty-fifty stocks, there was a more valuable lesson a few miles from Wall Street. On a Saturday in June of 1973 the Belmont Stakes was run. It was not much of a contest. Secretariat won by 31 lengths, setting a track record. While that was interesting, the real lesson of the day was that I didn’t bet on what was clearly the best horse in the race. More importantly, I did not bet on any horse in the race. When Secretariat won, the horse paid $2.20 for each $2.00 bet. What I learned was that even with the best horse in the world things can happen, or if you will “racing luck” might happen. (Sounds as if I was conscious of Howard Marx’s avoiding absolute certainty.) I was practicing good actuarial science, which excludes events so rare that they are unlikely to reappear. What I learned was that to not bet is a bet. Wagers should only be made when the odds of winning are high enough to cover losses in the past or in the future.

 

Conclusion

Investing should not be considered a single chance to make or lose money. The more you are aware of the world around you, the better your chances of finding some winning investments and keeping your losses small.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What Do Single Digits Mean? - Weekly Blog # 799

Mike Lipper's Blog: Some Past Errors Create Future Problems - Weekly Blog # 798

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inputs to Implications - Weekly Blog # 797

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Not Much - Weekly Blog # 726

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Not Much

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Anyone who has served guard duty instinctively senses some of their most dangerous moments being described as “not much happening”, just before dangerous things happen. This is my gut feeling looking at the US stock market activity last week. (Both the government bond and commodities markets moved under the strain of adjusting to supply shortages, including Russian Uranium.)

Calibrating “Not Much”

The main function of this blog is to assist investors in their thinking about long-term investments, typically extending from five years to multiple lifetimes. With that as a framework, the guiding math becomes clear. On the downside there is always the potential for a 100% loss, excluding any additional leverage losses or legal settlements. My long-term objective is multiples of the potential 100% loss, or to quote the great stock portfolio manager Peter Lynch, “ten baggers”. (Peter learned and worked for the late Ned Johnson, who died this week. Ned was the second CEO of Fidelity Management & Research. Ned was more than just a first-class money manager; he was a good selector of talent and found new ways to invest and market investments globally. Ned changed the investment business around the world. His daughter Abby, the third member of the Johnson family to be the CEO, is going even further.) 

If one gains multiples of loss positions it doesn’t take long to produce a satisfactory return, it just takes patience to ride out multiple-year periods. 

Every Journey Begins with The First Step

The first step begins with direction, chosen or not, and a small distance. With rare exception, first steps are consequential to the result, except when beginning a march to a meaningful end. It is this exception that drives me to focus on what happens each week. Most things don’t materially matter, but some do in the short and long-term. This is the reason I spend a lot of time and energy pouring over what happens. I will share my reactions to the surface elements of an inconclusive week.

Short to Long-Term Implications

• The NYSE up-volume dropped to 13.7 million shares from 20 million shares the week before, while the NASDAQ up-volume rose to 15.4 million shares from 10 million shares the prior week. Downside volume was essentially the same level each week. (I suspect some of the up-volume in the prior week was short-covering to curtail losses. In the second week the selection process favored tech stocks.)
• There has been some extreme performance year-to-date, with Commodities enjoying the best performance since 1915 (WWI) and bonds the worst since 1941 (WWII). 
• In the last 16 years, $2.6 Trillion went into bonds and only $ 1.85 Trillion went into stocks.

(Looking at the last two items raises the question as to whether the US dollar can retain its privileged position of being able to borrow globally in its own currency? It may be determined by where critical commodity resources are found.)

• The price of coal has risen to $330 per ton from $80.50 at the end of 2020. Little in the way of energy capacity is planned to come on stream before 2025. The call to end global trade and production is the opposite of what Adam Smith wrote about at the time of The American Revolution. There will likely be multiple sources of critical supply when sought, but at increased cost.
• East Coast US ports have been less busy recently. I suspect inventories have been restocked. Retail sales have also slowed or have been priced too high.
• Goldman Sachs and others have discussed an increased risk of a policy-induced recession 
• There is no doubt we have entered a global food shortage period, driven by the absence of supply from Russia/Ukraine, and others due to insufficient investment. Food prices will be going up partially due to a labor shortage.

Many of these noted problems are already impacting our markets, as others will in the future. Never-the-less, after this period of contraction it will eventually lead to a period of expansion and opportunity, if patient. The cyclical will turn to a favorable phase, allowing us to use our brains, capital, and patience to ride out the storm.

Help is on the way. 

  

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/03/relative-or-payout-returns-in-periods.html 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/03/building-your-future-winning-portfolio.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/02/successful-investing-expects-unexpected.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Relative or Payout Returns in Periods - Weekly Blog # 725

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Relative or Payout Returns in Periods

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Throughout life we learn that successful investing is an artform, which means that people with different perspectives view actions differently at different times. Thus, no single investment fits the needs of everyone. With that starting point, we believe successful investing is going to be different for each of us and should not be taught based only on numbers and regulations.

I believe the single most important starting point in investing is identifying the period of investment. Our current culture is very much focused on now, with the media reinforcing that view. To the extent a future period is mentioned, it is tomorrow, next week, month, or year-end. Even when we state the decision period, we don’t describe the terminal date. For example, we know that US stocks on average produce high single digit returns for long periods of time. Thus, an 8% return for 2022 could be forecast. That could be considered a good or bad return compared to alternatives. Early this week, a positive return half that size could have been acceptable. By the end of the week, any annual return below 20% would be considered dismal.

The financial and popular media place us in a relative world, making comparisons of what they believe are competitive investments. After all, stock prices are subject to the same risks and rewards! This is a gaming or gambling attitude. Most of the money we are responsible for use current investments to produce total returns for use in future periods. Consequently, we think about returns compared to the expected uses of the money, with sufficient excesses to cover periodic shortfalls. While the size of the excess pool could be based on actuarial assumptions, it is more likely to be a comfort factor. (One reason many bear market survivors don’t do well in future periods is that they carry with them the fear of even worse future markets. It is quite possible that after a large decline one should reduce the size of the excess reserves.)

PORTFOLIOS STRUCTURE

The first recommended step is to sub-divide the investment portfolio into time-focused sub portfolios. Considering the current unsettled global, political, and financial conditions, I suggest the first sub portfolio cover expected payments between now and the end of the first year of the next president. The excess over payments might be in the order of 30%, declining as stock prices decline.

The second sub portfolio should cover the period after the first, perhaps going through the expected lifetime of the principal owner. The reserve component should be no more than half the first sub-portfolio, because based on history markets generally rise 75% of the time.

The final sub-portfolio should anticipate being expended after the expected lifetime of the principal owner. The volatility reserve should be half of the second portfolio’s.

ASSINGING CURRENT MARKET DATA TO PORTFOLIOS

Caution: My investment views are for the most part contrarian to popular views. They take advantage of the historic experience that when contrarian views succeed, they have a larger payoff than popular views, whose benefits are usually already in current prices. However, contrarian expectations do not come into fruition as often as popular views.

Immediate Portfolio

The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) six-month sample survey shows 22.5% being bullish and 49.8% bearish. Extreme readings are normally under 20% and over 50%. Market analysts use this as a contrary indicator. (When these numbers reverse, watch out.)

Up and down transaction volume is also something of a contrarian indicator. In the week ended Friday, the NYSE had more shares moving up than down, 20 million vs. 10 million. Normally they are more balanced. After a long period of declining prices, the next upward spike is often caused by short sellers or custodians buying to cover shorts that need to be liquidated. While the relief rally on at the “big board” gained all five days of the week, the DJ Transportation Index was up only 3 days, and the Utility Index was up only 2 days. (Unless the upward movement broadens out, the rally may not be able to sustain itself for long.)

Working Portfolio

According to a recent survey of institutional managers, growth stocks were not favored over value stocks for the first time in many years. Since 2007, the MSCI ACWI ex US Growth index has been flat (Morgan Stanley Capital International All Country). (If this view is maintained, the relative multiple of growth price/earnings ratios will decline and represent a bargain at some point. But it also may suggest that earnings will grow at a materially slower rate. Another possibility is earnings outside of US Growth companies growing faster than those in the US, along with their stock prices.

Estate Portfolios

Each week Barron’s publishes the performance of the 25 largest US Equity Oriented Mutual funds from my old shop. Only five management companies placed funds on this list: American Funds (Capital Group) - 10, Vanguard - 9, Fidelity - 3, Dodge & Cox - 2 and PIMCO - 1. The total net assets of the funds range from $125 billion for Growth Fund of America (Capital Group) down to $53.8 billion for Vanguard Wellesley/Adm. (Note: all these funds have been serving investors for many years and American, Vanguard, and Dodge & Cox have done a good job of capital preservation. This may be important to their fund holders and distributors, although at some point in the future I expect to see more capital appreciation-oriented funds on the list, at least for a while.)

In all the discussion on the availability of petroleum, politicians and US Government people forget that the Bakken reserves represent over 500 billion barrels and would last for more than 100 years at current consumption levels. I believe the combination of our fuel and refinery expertise makes this supply one of the cleanest in the world. Considering the declining number of US based refineries and the low margins in the business, there could be a temporary bottleneck that could be addressed. (Whether an investment management organization has a direct investment in energy or not, I believe a knowledgeable energy analyst is essential for a successful portfolio management business in the future.)

Question of the Week:

How much of your portfolio is focused primarily on relative returns vs meeting payout needs?

  

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/03/building-your-future-winning-portfolio.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/02/successful-investing-expects-unexpected.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/02/we-are-progressing-weekly-blog-721.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.