What Can Go Wrong - Weekly Blog # 940

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What Can Go Wrong

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Preface

In preparing to start a buying program using one of the lessons from betting at the track you should recognize what could go wrong. The purpose of this blog is not to permit betting, but to avoid wagering on one’s ego and failing to learn from the experience.

 

There are four general reasons for not seeing an opportunity as a trap.

1. Not appreciating the goals of the source.
2. Inaccurate data or badly displayed data.
3. Failing to process past mistakes.
4. Too difficult to fathom. (Probably the least in terms of occurrence)

 

Tocqueville, as quoted by Goldman Sachs who deals well with errors. “The greatness of America lies not being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather her ability to repair her faults.” Therefore, I view betting on horses, securities, politics, people, and many other things, as learning experiences.

 

Sources of Mistakes

We all have deeply felt biases. The media and their chorus of pundits use information to motivate repeat use of their work. Thus, they transmit their pronouncements in the way we would like to read, see, or hear. For example, in the latest announcements of the number of people hired, it was better than many expected compared to the prior, shorter month, with bad weather. Deep in the article was the fact that it was not better than the same month last year. Furthermore, if you deduct healthcare and social assistance workers from the total employed, there has been no growth since 2024. Why is this important? The latter group receives payments from the federal government, either directly or indirectly, which will likely have some impact on the midterm elections.

 

This is probably a major reason for the various market indices going up. Using the data for this week only, 2/3rds of the stocks advanced and 1/3rd did not. Even on Friday, there was little focus on the number of new unemployment claims, which rose for the week. There was little coverage of the consumer sentiment survey by the University of Michigan, which hit a new low.

 

When companies release layoff numbers, they are vague and rounded. What disturbs me is that these are some of the most numeric-driven companies: Fidelity, Deloitte, and Commerzbank, all of which announced cutbacks. For some time, established financial and auditing firms around the world have been retiring senior people without hiring replacements. Even some “AI” people have been let go.

 

One of the most dangerous items of news is a shortage of an industry’s goods followed by a new large supply becoming available. Historically, look at what happened to the price of gold when the size of the Latin American precious metal was announced. While it made Spain wealthy, it hurt the other European nations with lots of gold in their vaults. So be careful if quantities jump up while simultaneously being withdrawn.

 

What We Should Have Learned?

Perhaps we should have learned from recorded history the need to negotiate debts payments, date, and rate! Examples include the Babylonians, William Shakespeare’s “Merchant of Venus”, the expansion and depression of the 1920s and 1930s, or even the present occupant of the White House.  

 

Almost every sector in the commercial world has added debt as their currency for expansion. This is one reason to keep an eye on the slowdown in ROTCE (Return on Total Capital Employed). Bearing in mind that this sum does not cover accidents and supply chain issues adequately.

 

Please let me know what you think I can learn. 

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Weekend’s Learning Sources - Weekly Blog # 939

Mike Lipper's Blog: Watch Out for the Four - Weekly Blog # 938

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors’ Interlude - Weekly Blog # 937

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

 

         

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Diversification

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                                                                        

 

Preface

On a recent trip to London, Ruth and I attended a private fund and friend raising concert for the Academy of St. Martin’s in the Fields (ASMF), where Ruth is the first American trustee. The wonderful music was performed by Joshua Bell, the artistic director, and five other top-notch string musicians from the ASMF. Between the six talented musicians they played three different types of string instruments, alternating between lead and ensemble roles. The result was a successful combination of each of their talents.

 

Even when listening to a magnificent concert performance, I cannot forget my investment responsibilities. As individual musicians alternated from leading to supporting roles, it reminded me of what individual securities should do in a diversified long-term investment portfolio.

 

Application to Portfolio Management

In 1940 the SEC completed their depression-oriented reform rules. Among the last of these was the Investment Company Act of 1940, which unlike the other six regulations was not formed at their SEC headquarters. It was produced at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington by lawyers for the fund industry from Boston, New York (where the industry’s trade association was headquartered), Philadelphia, and Washington. Considering their recent experience of the market falling during the Depression, the mood of the meeting was to try reduce the chance of big future declines. The best model for that were state laws governing trust accounts, using generations of work by Boston and Philadelphia lawyers. (Even as late as the early 1960s a few Boston law firms had professional securities analysts on staff to assist in managing trust accounts.) Note, the main concern of the creators of fund regulation was the avoidance of losses. No word was spoken of making money on investments.

 

They thought the best way to reduce the chance of major losses was to limit an account’s exposure to any single investment. This led to limiting the percentage amount that funds could invest in any one stock, which usually meant no more than 5% of the voting stock at cost (not market). To this very day, most equity funds are labeled as diversified if they adhere to this principal.

 

The Problem with Voting Stock Limits

The biggest penalty paid by investors is not losses, but the absence of profits. Mutual Funds with long histories often make ten, twenty, or even more times as much on some of their holdings, which more than covers a small number of losses. Furthermore, great fortunes have been made, particularly over successive generations, in single stock portfolios or portfolios having a small number of investments.

 

For Professional Investors

The concept of risk management is critical but doing it by name or percentage of voting shares does not reduce risk, it may increase if all investments are exposed to a single concept. In the late nineteenth century professional investors considered concentration to be the best and safest way to invest. My college degree is from Columbia University, which had an endowment fully invested in railroad bonds and stocks, every single one file for bankruptcy. Today there is a risk that some participants in the “AI” surge could produce similar results by investing in too much in a good thing.

 

For publicly traded securities I suggest the biggest risks is with the stock owner and not the issuer, as they will be sellers of the stock before you do. Other risks include countries, technology, politics, and management. These can be identified as short-term and long-term factors. A possible short-term indicator is slightly more participants being bearish than bullish in the latest American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey of expectations for the next six months. Interestingly, the long-term indicator was Friday’s announcement by the Supreme Court, which ruled against the President’s authority to set tariffs using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which had very little to any impact on the market.

 

Bottom line, watch the musicians play and how well they work together, both with other musicians and staff, but also watch the reaction of the audience.

 

Understanding Going Global

In a recent conversation with a London-based fund manager, who in the past was almost completely invested in the US but now has a growing position in European stocks. While he has the biggest portion of his portfolio in US securities, he is very risk aware and expresses this by augmenting his portfolio with European stocks. Normally, he expects his US positions to outperform his European positions, but not in a declining market. In terms of P/E, Free Cash Flow, Dividend Yield, and other value measures, European stocks are less risky than US holdings.

 

 Another careful investor was Charlie Munger, who listed six principles to be avoided: High Financial Leverage, High Operating Leverage, Negative Cashflow, Poor Governance, High Risk of Obsolescence, No Competitive Advantage vs. a Strong Competitor.

 

Share your thoughts

                

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

Mike Lipper's Blog: Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

Mike Lipper's Blog: Do Current Prices Lead Future Markets? - Weekly Blog # 926

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Strategically, Time to Think Differently

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

Warning: Almost No One Will Agree, Nevertheless Consider

My Burden: Hedging

 

After a market week of lots of good earnings and media pundit optimism, it’s time to worry. Individually, before we consider securities investments, we should consider our personal long-term investments. For most of our adult lives our two biggest investments are our homes and jobs. While we believe we know the numbers, we are wrong!

 

We fail to include in the analysis of our residence the true costs that come with the property over time. For instance, we do not include real estate taxes, either paid directly or included in rent payments. If we stay in our homes for ten years, in one place or more, the aggregate cost will probably equal the cost of buying initially. But that is not the actual cost of living in a home. That amount should also include the cost of local organizations we join, as well as the cost of any repairs and maintenance. Thus, the combined cost should be considered, as well as the planned next location, which likely represents a potentially large unhedged risk.

 

As large as the cost of home ownership is, it is hopefully smaller than the next risk. For most of us, our biggest risk throughout perhaps the first twenty years of our adult lives, is employment risk. If we work for one or multiple employers and we are not self-employed during most of our working years, our biggest risk is employment risk. We are living in a fast-changing economic world, where employers disappear as a result of business mistakes, technological change, badly executed mergers, and younger, smarter, better educated, and cheaper competitors.

 

We are Not Helpless

Over time, we can not only help ourselves but also accumulate sufficient capital to provide long-lasting wealth to cover our own lives and hopefully those of our loved ones too. This can be accomplished by regularly spending less than we make through our jobs and investments. Cyclicality is our enemy. As we move up in the commercial world an increasing portion of our wealth comes from accepting portions of compensation that have equity-like rewards and risks. The further you move up the economic ladder, the greater the rewards and risks. Additionally, the higher you go up the ladder, the more cyclical it becomes. Income fluctuates with sales and profits, but also due to changes in politics within the organization. This cyclicality should be hedged to the degree possible.

 

Selection of Investments is Critical

Picking good investments is always difficult. For the most protection, the primary goal should be seeking assets that hedge those investments generating the highest gain. I believe we are on the cusp of a period of major change, not the continuation of “happy talk” optimism. This past week there were dramatic headline changes of direction, but the market as measured by the S&P 500 barely returned to its prior high. Concurrently, the Economic Cyclical Research Institute (ECRI) industrial price indicator dropped to 122.27% from the prior week’s 131.20%. While this was an extremely happy reading of growing inflation, I suspect it was driven by natural gas prices plummeting -21.41% and diesel falling -4.79%. Far too many retail investors follow prices on the NYSE, where 39% of the stocks declined for the week. However, the better performing NASDAQ Composite saw 56% of its prices fall. Also, the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey showed the bullish outlook falling to +39.7% from +44.4% the prior week. In the real-world January produced the largest cut in jobs, which have been falling for 8 months.  

 

Conclusion: One Should Hedge

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read:

Mike Lipper's Blog

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Stock Markets Move on Expectations - Weekly Blog # 805

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Stock Markets Move on Expectations

Commodities Move on Transactions

Most Economics Relate to Needs

Politics Rotate on Vote Guesses

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

Variables

These are among the more significant variables that investors and the rest of society juggle in reaching investment decisions. Most investors focus their attention on only a few variables. Some use just one, like price charts or reported earnings.

 

Perhaps my lack of confidence in understanding the complete details of variables drives me to look for correlations, which is why I ponder many variables. This tends to result in the creation of diversified portfolios of funds and individual securities. Because my clients and I invest to meet a number of different needs, our investments are focused on several time periods.

 

With these thoughts as guidelines, I’ll share a number of factors I am concerned about that leave me worried. I expect the future to include numerous changes, with some coming as surprises. My portfolios are likely to be fully invested, with a willingness to shift elements when I become more convinced of the wisdom of future actions.

 

The tragedy in Israel is too new to take into proper perspective. Thus, I am excluding it from this blog, but not from my mind.

 

List of Worries (Not in rank order)

1. The number of small company bankruptcies is rising, along with general error rates. These are some of the critical connecting points in our society and likely to have larger repercussions.
2. The drop in food consumption at low-end retail outlets suggests budgets are getting stretched.
3. Jaime Dimon’s 100-year prediction of a 3 ½ day work week leaves too much time for troublemaking.
4. Those with advanced degrees have lost confidence in colleges/universities. Students graduating with degrees, including PhDs, have no job opportunities for their degrees. (All the nobility were blamed, and many executed during the French Revolution.)
5. A little more than half of mutual fund peer-group averages have generated losses over the last 3 years. (There is a risk of people refusing to invest.)
6. As developing nations mature, they attempt to import replacement of some of their imports, which reduces world trade.
7. UPS and FedEx often sell at discounts. (Deflation)
8. 75% of the items listed in the WSJ weekend prices declined (Deflation)
9. The S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index rose +4% in September. Due to dollar strength, Energy and Metals rose +3.5%, with Agriculture falling -4.35%. There may be some speculative input in these numbers.

 

Critical Questions:

1. What are the indicators you are watching?
2. What do you think?
3. Will you share your thoughts?                                                                          

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Prepare to be Bullish, Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 804

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selling: Art & Risks, Current & Later - Weekly Blog # 803

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Thinking During a Lull - Weekly Blog # 802

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

2021 Lessons and a New Worry - Weekly Blog # 714

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

2021 Lessons and a New Worry

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

The Mind Set

Every day is a learning opportunity, although we often don’t view it that way. While we begrudgingly accept some of our investment actions not turning out as planned, we find temporarily culprits for the cause of those mistakes. I cannot continue to blame others for my results, I must accept I contributed to those unhappy results. Over the years I have been forced to recognize that some mistakes in thinking are repeated far too often.

2021 Mistakes

First, is not keeping in mind the one truism about investing and life, that there generally will be mistakes. The only market guaranty is that it creates humility in the survivors.

Second, the appropriate way to think about a collection of futures is to assign some rough odds of being correct. The number is not as important as the recognition that you might be wrong. The general reasons we might be wrong includes the following “3 I’s league”: Incomplete analysis, Inaccurate inputs, and Indefinite time periods of success or failure.

Third, there are other rules of the game which guide our actions:

1. Recognition that the numbers we use are an abstraction of reality, not reality itself, which is full of unpredictable people.
2. In a news centric investment world, we tend to value the latest news above the flow of past information.
3. There is a search for fairness, which has never existed in the real world, particularly among new or amateur investors. In truth, life and investing is not simple or fair.
4. The following unrecognized shortening of decision times has led to much more volatility, which some confuse with risk. 

• Politicians intensely focused on the mid-term elections will try to force more stimulus payments on the portions of society likely to vote for them, not really caring about the induced inflation. Furthermore, they will attempt to raise the taxes of the capital bases in opposition. (Remember, money is the mother’s milk of politics.) 
• The investment industry has also shortened the performance period by introducing wealth management asset-based fees as an alternative to brokerage commissions. This has caused the switch to increase trading in ETFs. The sale of mutual funds, have anti-churning restrictions. 
• In 2021, for the first time, the compounded dollar impact of traded short-term options was greater than the aggregate value of shares traded. (Typical of a contrarian, I have lengthened the period for measuring investment success.) 

5.  Whether we like it or not we are all globalists by circumstance, not by choice. It impacts our lives and investments and will become even more important in the future.

Missing the Significance of Pandemics

In seeing how point 5 is likely to impact our investments, recognize that the two major variants of COVID-19 came out of China and South Africa to infect much or the world. Globalization follows the path of commodity prices, which drive both food and energy prices higher globally. Bottom line, we cannot escape the impact of globalization on our lives and investments.

Just as we used horsepower to measure the influence of internal combustion engines on society, investors are similarly using the incorrect measure to understand the power of globalization.

Last week I mentioned at least one investment manager who focused on the supply side of trade, rather than the much more popular demand side. Carrying this analysis further, China is the largest single importer. I think we should be looking at China’s impact on the exports of other countries. Germany, US, Canada, Australia, and Japan are increasingly dependent on exporting to China.

China’s domestic growth, while still a multiple of the rest of the world, is slowing down. They have been building their financial reserves, which could backstop their export earnings if they were to slow. China’s slowdown is due to their population growth declining, both in terms of the overall birthrate and the movement of rural peasants into cities. Once in the cities, the peasants find work for domestic or foreign owners and the productivity of their labor grows. (One of the issues facing the rest of the world is labor productivity not growing as fast, due to the focus on schools, rather than education and useful learning. This concern is multiplied by the Chinese being savers and soon investors, which our populations are not.)

We are correctly concerned about the Chinese growing militarily, including in space. In their long history, the Chinese have gone to war to protect their borders and critical suppliers perceived to be vulnerable to opposing forces. They, like the Japanese, don’t want to add people to their country, just their goods and services. (In the West, Rome conquered much of the known world to get slaves, which were often freed once acclimated within the Roman Empire. Europeans hope to grow their population base at a lower cost by expansion, rather than through growing their own population.)

Simultaneous slowdowns in China and the rest of the world are not likely to be bullish for the global securities markets.

Question for Subscribers: Are you worried? What Do you intend to do?      

  

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/12/are-investors-taking-too-much.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/12/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/12/selections-weekly-blog-710.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.