Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Short-Term

The data is so negative that brief and violent rallies are to be expected. Net stock selling has consistently outpaced buying for each of the last four weeks. For example, 85% of the NYSE stocks and 81% of NASDAQ stocks fell in the latest week. As Barron’s noted “cash is looking more appealing since stock market hedges, bonds, and gold are no longer working.” Employers are barely replacing the more expensive retiring labor in most manufacturing functions.

 

There is a new player in the game, private credit. For the most part issuers of private credit instruments don’t qualify for bank loans, and they don’t have long credit histories either. Much of this paper is held in new funds, which are being sold to retail channels. When one of these loans gets in trouble it is referred to as a “cockroach”. Jaime Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase (*) warned that where there is one “cockroach” there is likely to be more.

(*) JPM shares are owned in managed accounts.

 

Market analysts are concerned that the S&P 500 Index has been locked in a narrow 300-point band for the last four months, with optimists and pessimist exchanging positions. This week, the lower boundary line was briefly pierced. If the “500” drops 3% more, then the 400-point range will become a difficult region for the market to rise beyond for quite a period. This fear may briefly spark some rallies from the derivative and short players.

 

Longer-Term Implications of History

One purpose of recorded history is to explain what happened, at least in the eyes of the winning survivors. The survivors, or their intellectual heirs, construct rules as to why certain actions are repeated. If there are enough repetitions the rules become dictum, even though the battle conditions are different. We are taught from a very early age to follow rules without an understanding of the conditions that created them. This blind acceptance of rules has led to occasional great mistakes in politics, the military, sports, families, business, and of course investing. Historic labels often become shorthand for rules. For instance: Adam and Eve, George Washington, the NY Yankees, Democrats, Republicans, Chopin, etc.

 

As has been noted before, I learned basic analysis at the NY racetracks. One great lesson from racing lore was Man of War, which had 25 winning races in a row but lost his last race to an unknown horse named Upstart. Proving unexpected things can and occasionally do happen. My self-appointed task at the track was to guess the chance of the unexpected happening.

 

Applying the racetrack experience to investing I looked at the historical record of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger for stocks and companies in which to invest. In an oversimplification there were at least three characteristics the winners had in common, the nature of customers, the characteristics of the workforce, and the discipline of integrity. (I suspect the last was penned by his long-term counsel and director Ron Olson, a fellow ex-trustee of Caltech.)

 

If the US stock market does decline materially in the period ahead, I will try to apply the track lessons learned. Charlie Munger taught Warren Buffett it was better to buy a good company at a reasonable price and not wait for a cheap price. For many years there were great companies we didn’t own because they were selling way above a reasonable price. I expect a number of these “beauties” will be available at reasonable prices during the next depression.

 

Next Depression

I don’t know when it will happen but based on human nature, I expect it to happen. The US has had only four Presidents that were restructurers: Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, and Trump. Below are some parallels to the 1930-1942 depression:

• Each challenged the constitution and fought with the courts
• Weakened the controls on the banks
• Set the stage for war
• Weakened the currency
• Encouraged the retail public to invest in speculative vehicles
• Changed how the US was governed
• All Presidents, except Andrew Jackson, were involved with Japan

No historical comparison is identical, and the future may be different than the past, but odds favor a closer similarity.

 

Please share your views, there is much to learn.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

Mike Lipper's Blog: Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Selective Readings of Data - Weekly Blog # 892

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Selective Readings of Data

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

                             

 

 

Assumption

I assume as a careful reader of these musing one cannot avoid the “happy talk” produced by most of the media. For balance, as a public service for my blog readers, I’ll focus on data and other information supporting the other side.

 

Long-Term

Jaime Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase, was recently quoted as follows: “If we are not the pre-eminent military and pre-eminent economy in 40 years, we will not be the reserve currency…” He is pleading with you to develop four views that he considers critical to a sound investment philosophy. They are the importance of military standing, economic position, having a forty-year view (the bulk of institutional and individual money is invested for long periods), and the significance of being the sole reserve currency.) I will be happy to discuss your views on these questions.

 

Others’ Views Focused on the Short-Term

Recently, 17 well-known investment advisors made estimates of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index 2025 closing price. Nine estimates were higher and eight lower. The lowest was JP Morgan Chase, 13% below Friday’s close. (Of all the various stock market indices, I believe the S&P 500 Index is the best to gage the level of the market. On Friday it only gained one tenth of 1%, showing the stickiness of the movement.) Morgan Stanley is expecting the US dollar to drop 9% over the next year.

 

Unfavorable Conditions

Retail investors of all sizes are being told to invest in private investment vehicles, including private equity. These investments represent some 30% of the M&A market. History suggests the public buyers come into many trends last.

 

Currently, there are 7.5 million unfilled job openings. Employers can’t find suitable workers. I believe many potential employees lack sufficient motivation, discipline, and/or integrity for these jobs. This is leading to a low growth rate in labor productivity.

 

The employees themselves are one reason for these conditions at commercial, government, and nonprofit institutions. Due to the slow growth of our society there are pressures at all levels of management to improve labor productivity. Managers strive for efficiency, defined as output divided by input. The simple way to do that is to assign generated revenue to each worker. This is relatively easy to do for line employees, by leaving out the supervisors. The next step is to reduce the number of supervisors. This creates efficiency. However, supervisors create most of the worksite culture, which leads to product and service quality.

 

In just about every sector of modern life we are experiencing a decline in the quality of the products or services we receive. However, as a result of employers not hiring more experienced quality supervisors, this has led to customer dissatisfaction, lower customer/client loyalty, lower sales, and fewer recommendations. Employers should be hired for effectiveness, which would reduce costly mistakes and improve relationships.

 

Two World Realties

As long as we have politicians and their advocates chanting happy talk about the economy while employers cut back on hiring, we are going to experience a dichotomy in the investment world. We can hope for the best but should be prepared for the worst.

 

The Form Does Work

As many subscribers already know, I count my former time at the New York racetracks as a critical learning experience. Consequently, the running of the Belmont Stakes, which was run early Saturday evening, is very important to me. The race is now one quarter mile shorter than the traditional 1½ miles, which means its long history of winning times is no longer relevant to racing analysts (handicappers).  From a betting/investment standpoint, the job of the analyst is to evaluate the odds of a particular horse winning vs the odds posted on the tote boards. These odds are derived from the amount of money invested on each horse, including taxes and fees paid to the track. The smaller the odds, the more popular the payoff selection on the winning horse. In many ways this is similar to the most popular investments in the marketplace. It is important to remember that the most popular bets, called favorites, win a minority of the time. But they do win more often than the less popular bets.

 

The first three horses crossing the finish line at the Belmont Stakes were the same three horses finishing in that order at the Kentucky Derby. Thus, the history of these horses proves to be a good predictor. Can stock buyers count on a similar phenomenon in picking stock investments? It is occasionally possible, but not all the time.

 

If using lessons learned at the racetrack seems a bit odd, think about Ruth and I attending a New Jersey symphony concert on Sunday afternoon. This featured two great classical performers, Xian Zhang, conductor and Conrad Tao, pianist. They impressively played Sergei Rachmaninoff’s second piano concerto. This piece was a breakthrough work marking Rachmaninoff emerging from a three-year depression. The length of the depression could be a useful guide to an investment depression, unless the government lengthens the period of the depression, as FDR did in 1937.

 

Thoughts?      

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: No One Knows: Searching for Clues - Weekly Blog # 891

Mike Lipper's Blog: “Straws in the Wind”: Predictions? - Weekly Blog # 890

Mike Lipper's Blog: After Relief Rally, 3rd Strike or Out? - Weekly Blog # 889

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds - Weekly Blog # 883

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

Short-Term Rally

Focusing exclusively on short-term data suggests that when there is a strong broad market trend in one direction for an extended time, a countertrend is likely to surprise proponents of the longer primary trend. That is what I am expecting in the days and possibly weeks ahead, a somewhat explosive rise in the general market indices. Below are some indicators of why an explosive rise is likely:

• On Friday, 90.5% of the stocks on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) fell in price. Typically, when 90% of a universe goes in one direction, it is close to being exhausted.
• In looking at the daily price charts of both the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and the Dow Jones Transportation Average, from their historic peaks to Friday’s close they have declined enough from their historic high points to conclude that the last rise has been fully discounted.
• A third set of indicators is the weekly sample survey from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). The sample survey divides the views for the market six months from the current date into bullish, bearish, and neutral. In an idealized state one would think approximately one-third of the sample would fall into each category, although that is likely not the case since it is an audience of stock owners. Thus, the “normal” vote favors a bullish view. Recently, the survey showed a contrarian result in favor of the bears and two weeks ago the split was almost 2 to1, 59.2% bearish and 27.4% bullish. This week the ratio was much closer to 3 to1, 21.8% bullish and 61.9% bearish). In theory the AAII survey’s audience is made up of retail investors who have a good long-term record of guessing right, but not at turning points. Perhaps this time the public is in-line with the professionals.

 

When discussing a possible rally with people, I urged them to use the opportunity to reposition their portfolio for a new bull market, not the old one that may already have concluded in 2024.

 

Putting Tariffs in Perspective

While not perfect as a future model, it may be useful to compare the current situation with the early 1930s. The US was in the early stages of a “normal” cyclical recession triggered by the creation of too much debt.

Coming out of WWI there were constraints on the economy, men were returning to the workforce, the farm belt was producing food for a starving world, and Russia was having extreme economic problems. Additionally, the banking community was pushing out debt to support the expansion of the 1920s, including margin loans from Wall Street.

 

As the rest of the world was getting back on its feet it was better able to feed itself, which reduced the price of food produced by US farmers. Many started to leave the farm-belt, with young men streaming into factories as small farms merged into larger ones. They were increasingly replaced by machines, which were sold to farmers on debt carried by the local small farm banks. The farmers, their dealers, and their banks, all needed to be recapitalized. They appealed to their politicians who passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which President Herbert Hoover reluctantly signed. Unfortunately, numerous other countries followed our lead, which led to a world-wide recession.

 

Why is this important to us?

There is an uncomfortable parallel with our situation today. We have permitted or encouraged prices to rise for eggs, meat, and milk, among other commodities. In other words, we have inflated our expenses. While not often aligned, Chairman Powell and Jaime Dimon are both very concerned. Interestingly, Jaime Dimon is a corporate descendant of J.P. Morgan. In 1907, in an attempt to head off a major crash, JP Morgan locked the leading bankers in his library and refused to let them out until they individually agreed to recapitalize the failing Trust companies.

 

What is the parallel to what we may be facing today? When FDR became the President in March of 1933, with his “brain trust” he like Trump was dealing with a cyclical recession which was not his fault. Somewhat like FDR, Trump appears to be turning a cyclical recession into a structural recession, using tariffs as the tool.

 

What Happens Now?

I don’t know, and I believe President Trump himself does not know. He knows what he wants to happen, but he doesn’t know whether he has enough Republican support to make it happen. The following is a possible path to what will follow:

1. The first not fully completed step, the announcement which focused on the rate of the proposed tariffs. President Trump is aware that there are at least two other critical issues that impact world trade; the regulations that deal with the negotiation of the size and shape of trade and payments, and secondly the price level of the currencies involved.
2. The next phase is the public or private position of the various countries.
3. Is the President really after the negotiation, which he feels is his skill set?
4. Implementation of the trade agreement. How will any of the agreements really work and be enforced. (This is the topic I am most concerned about as it takes skilled players to make it work. We have not seen many of these.)
5. Cheating is to be expected. How will it be handled?
6. The new or refurbished plants will eventually produce excess capacity.
7. If the dream becomes the world we live in, will it be a less artificial world than we live in today? Can we handle it?
8. The time to complete the process, if it fails, will be short. The Smoot Hawley Tariff ended three years after its passage. If the process succeeds, it is likely to take many years and different administrations.

 

I would appreciate your thoughts    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Increase in Bearish News is Long-Term Bullish - Weekly Blog # 882

Mike Lipper's Blog: Odds Favor A Recession Followed Up by the Market - Weekly Blog # 881

Mike Lipper's Blog: “Hide & Seek” - Weekly Blog # 880

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Confessions & Confusion of a “Numbers Nerd” - Weekly Blog # 867

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Confessions & Confusion of a “Numbers Nerd”

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Numbers Tell The Story

 My education at Columbia University, the USMC, and taking the CFA taught me that numbers tell the story. My brother and I created a company that sold mutual fund data for some of the largest fund organizations in the world. The problem is it was the wrong story. I fell into a trap common on the numbers loving Wall Street.  The trap is using numbers as a tool for many applications for which they were not intended.

 

The original sin was using the changing price level to make investment decisions, +10% or -8%. This leads to being happy with +10% and unhappy with -8%. Raw numbers can be misleading, until you understand the usage of numbers and their appropriate comparison.

 

Early in my career I called on the partner and treasurer of a management company who informed me he didn’t need our service because he had found something better. I asked to see this remarkable comparison. He showed the performance of all funds, regardless of mission, in his city! He was using the hometown comparison to set the wages of his workers. (Luckily, an outside lawyer working with the independent fund directors immediately recognized that what I was peddling would be essential for the directors.)

 

This experience brought home that there were at least two different needs in the same shop. The treasurer had an operational need to gage the competitive availability of labor needed for the fund’s work, while the lawyer wanted the directors to know how each of their funds were doing competitively.

 

Numbers in the right context are critical. An example of this is the +10% -8% example. The +10% is quite poor in a league averaging +20%, with the best at +30%. The -8% could be superior when the competitive average is -20% and the worst fund is down -30%.

 

Some psychologists believe losses are twice as painful as the pleasure of gains of similar magnitude. This probably averages out, with losses happening in one of four years in the US, but more frequently in other countries. I believe this pain level should also be addressed in terms of age. The older the individual, the less time they have to fully recover. Many of us rely on gains from investments that have been successful in the past, and our faith in them builds over time, so when they fail it is more destructive.

 

This is one of many reasons that relatively little money flowed into SEC registered “China Funds” this week, even though 13 of them were in the 25 best performing mutual funds. Small-caps pulled ahead of mid-caps for the week, which had performed better this year.

 

Before treating the above as purchase suggestions, I quote from Jaime Dimon “Past Performance is not indictive of future results.” However, I regularly look at investments that have done poorly for a long period of time.

 

Current Environment

Most democracies are unpopular and are favored by a decreasing number of supporters. Even in the US the Ex-President won a narrow victory, benefitting from a significant number of non-voting Americans.

 

With long-term productivity adjusted for inflation, higher than normal interest rates, a decline in the dollar, the near-term outlook is not good. This is perhaps the reason many smart companies are laying people off.

 

Please share your views with me, particularly when you feel I am wrong. I need your help.

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: It Doesn’t Feel Like a Bull Market - Weekly Blog # 866

Mike Lipper's Blog: Professional Worry Time vs Amateurs’ - Weekly Blog # 865

Mike Lipper's Blog: SPORTS FANS SELECT CABINET & OTHER PROBLEMS - Weekly Blog # 864

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Melt-Up, Leaks, & Echoes of 1907 - Weekly Blog # 858

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Melt-Up, Leaks, & Echoes of 1907

 

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

A sportscaster’s view of the US stock market is that many prices are gradually rising in a “melt-up”. But the owners of the teams, when possible, are curtailing spending. Some of the fans’ happy talk appears to be leaking away, particularly as the return on the value of their assets decline. Those who think only in terms of numbers, particularly streaks, should be worried. For the first time in 40 years the Vanderbilt football team beat Alabama!!! (This highlights the difference between a statistician and an analyst. A numbers hound believes the past is always prolog to the future, whereas a good analyst scans present conditions to determine the odds of a streak being disrupted. It is never zero.) Because of evolutionary changes in laws and technology the past should be viewed in terms of modern times. On the contrary, human behavior rarely changes under similar conditions, although it may impact the odds.

 

Something About the Name of Morgan and Financial Crisis

After a long period of financial expansion and the creation of new financial institutions, it was trust-companies, not banks that were in danger of failing after experiencing difficulty collecting on their loans. (The modern analogy could be private capital funds.) Trust-companies borrowed from banks and were publicly traded, but by 1907 there were concerns that a number were insolvent and would fail. JP Morgan, the man, was concerned and called a meeting of leading bankers to meet him in his library, which he locked until the bankers promised to contribute sufficient capital to rescue one large trust-company. By so doing, he single-handedly stopped the “Money Panic” of 1907.

 

While politicians in Washington were grateful, they felt Morgan had too much power. Consequently, a few years later they created the Federal Reserve Bank, which had supervisory power over large banks. This was The Fed’s initial mission and today it is really their first mission.

 

Jaime Dimon is the current CEO of JP Morgan Chase*, the largest US bank in terms of assets. JP Morgan Chase is the unofficial leader of the banking industry, so it goes without saying they see a parallel to the 1907 crisis. He is pleading for a modern solution that allows small banks to merge without time-consuming government regulation. *We are a small owner of shares in JP Morgan Chase and use the Private-Bank facilities.

 

Other Concerns

• Our European military allies in support of Ukraine and future wars are worried. There are concerns regarding the production of ammunition and other armaments, particularly during the present decline in our productivity. The rise of union workers will additionally shrink the corporate profits used to invest in research and expansion.
• The changing business structure of the investment market. There are concerns that stock exchanges around the world now earn a decreasing minority of their earnings from their initial business of trading and clearing securities. There are fewer brokerage firms, less daily liquidity, and more direct transactions.
• Brief news releases, repeated frequently, leads to a simplistic understanding of the economy, investments, and politics. For example, most news briefs focus mostly on movements in the New York Stock Exchange. However, there are numerous trading days where NYSE issues move in one direction and NASDAQ issues move in the other. The daily movement in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is much more volatile than the NASDAQ Composite. (Could it be that Washington has limited capacity to understand the difference between light-volume moves and high-volume moves?) On an average day the NASDAQ trades about five times the volume of the NYSE. (Part of this spread is the amount of trading between dealers to even-up their positions.) The Year over Year volume for the Big Board is down -11.26 %, whereas NASDAQ volume is up +26.27%. From an analysis vantage point, we see major differences between the two markets. On Friday, the percentage of new lows on the NYSE was 2.4% of issues traded vs 7.2% on the so-called junior exchange. (Is the NASDAQ showing it is closer to a peak after doing so much better for the year?)

 

Question: What are you concerned about?         

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Mis-Interpreting News - Weekly Blog # 857

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors Not Traders Are Worried - Weekly Blog # 856

Mike Lipper's Blog: Many Quite Different Markets are in “The Market” - Weekly Blog # 855

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

What I See and Perceive By Observing - Weekly Blog # 844

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What I See and Perceive By Observing

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

             

Often One Finds it is Difficult to Predict the Future 

I Currently find it particularly hard to predict the size and timing of the next recession. Economic news is sharply split between enthusiastic believers from discredited pundits and concerned business owners joined by the buying public. The index bulls currently appear to be winners over those focused on the near-term future, expressed through layoffs and a shift to more thrifty purchasing. 

 

During periods like this I find it useful to seek guidance from those far away from the worlds of economics and finance. Yoggi Berra was one of the most successful baseball catchers and later became a good manager of teams. He had a unique perspective derived from crouching behind home plate. One of his more well-known quotes is “You can observe a lot by just watching”. Using this mantra, the following observations may be useful. 

 

From the World of Numbers 

1. On Friday there was a significant difference between the percentage of rising and falling stocks on the two major US stock markets. Only 39% rose on the NYSE, while 63% rose on the NASDAQ. (This may indicate investors prefer shorter-term shares that are more speculative.) 
2. Extending the observations to a slightly longer period of a four-day trading week and shifting to prices, one get more balanced results. Fifty percent of the stocks on the “Big Board” rose, while 45% rose on the NASDAQ. (This shows that the general market is pretty much in balance.) 
3. Going out to a six-month outlook for the remaining half-year, the weekly AAII sample survey indicates an even more bullish than bearish bias, 41.7% vs. 2.6% respectively. It’s interesting that both indicators declined from the prior week by almost the same amount, 2.8% vs 2.2%. This is likely caused by a different group in the sample survey dominating. 
4. In looking at the list of equity funds that beat the performance of the S&P 500 in the first half. The three leaders were Fidelity Contrafund +25.6%, Vanguard Growth Index ETF +20.51%, and American Funds Growth Fund of America +16.80%. These three funds represent some of the oldest fund management companies and are the largest funds in the equity business. They also have three very distinct ways of managing money. Fidelity Contra is managed by a single manager and has wide latitude in terms of stock selection, with a turnover rate of 16 %. Vanguard Growth Index ETF has a very low turnover of 5% and Growth Fund of America has a turnover rate of 25%, which is below average.  Growth Fund of America is managed by a number of portfolio managers and the research department. (This demonstrates that there are several ways to perform well. The calculation of turnover is required by the SEC, which takes the smaller of sales over purchases divided by monthly average of total assets. The SEC was interested in identifying management churning the portfolio to generate commissions, so they only used the smaller of the two numbers. Thus, the real turnover is at least double the published turnover.)    

 

Observations in terms of People  

1. This is the year of elections, and the pundits are focusing their analysis on policies, which leads to inaccurate observations. The key is looking at the policies of the losers, not the winners, which is mostly the party now in power. In my opinion the losers failed to execute the solution to problems. One of the slogans ending Tammany Hall’s reign in New York was “Throw the Bums Out”, which is alive and well today against the “political class”. 
2. The media creates the experts they want to quote. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) recently announced the last “bear” has left Wall Street, referring to Marko Kolanovic leaving JP Morgan. When I first read the headline, I expected to read about Jaime Dimon, the CEO of the most powerful bank in the US, if not the world. JP Morgan is a stock I own. In last week’s blog I mentioned the number of leaders of both commercial and industrial firms that have been preparing for the next recession for some time. (In predicting a recession, the exact date of the beginning should be separated from the probability and timing of the event.) 

 

 

Please share Your Thoughts 

         

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing for a Recession - Weekly Blog # 843

Mike Lipper's Blog: Understanding the Universe May Help - Weekly Blog # 842

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stock Markets Becoming More Difficult - Weekly Blog # 841

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Transactional Signals - Weekly Blog # 840

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Transactional Signals

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

  

When my term as President of the New York Society of Security Analysts (NYSSA) expired, I turned down staying on the Board feeling that comments by the former President may not be welcomed. I offered to provide inputs privately when asked. I made a similar offer when I moved on from my position as a USMC officer. With that as a background, I found myself in a somewhat analogous position as a member of the Finance Committee of the Board of the Stevens Institute, where I review an extensive report containing the student managed investment fund. 

 

While the other trustees were highly complementary as to the work of the students, I thought they should get a real education from this exercise. I felt the analysis was lacking any discussion of management and its expected retirement. This was logical, as their time period was the length of the current academic term. To me this was trading, as it was not long enough for an investment period. To me, investment periods begin with five years (roughly the average length of many CEOs). I suggested there was a reasonable chance of a new CEO over the 5-year period.  

 

With this as background, I noted with interest the Barron’s article titled “A Trio of Transitions Will Rock Wall Street”. The three are Larry Fink, Jaime Dimon, and Stephen Schwarzman. The article would have been more useful if it had discussed the likely cause of the retirements: recession, unfavorable regulation, stronger competition, new products/services, shrinking internal political support. With aspects of technology and finance coming closer together, changes in the management of Apple, Microsoft, and the Stock/Commodity exchanges, among others, should be expected within the next five years.

 

I will briefly discuss some of the characteristic changes that may impact stock prices within five years.

 

Possible Recession Risk

Any student of economic and financial history knows that there will be periodic recessions caused by the mistakes of leaders and others. If one looks carefully there is usually a small signal that most ignore. One may be what is happening with the ISM data on the manufacturing side of the economy.

 

The ISM Manufacturing PMI survey for May had a reading of 48.7, a contraction from the April reading of 49.2, a fall of 0.5. The survey for new orders fell to 45.4 from 49.1 in April, a sharp drop of 3.7.

 

Manufacturing employment on the other hand went up to 51.1 from 48.5 in April!!! A possible explanation could be manufacturers hiring younger and cheaper people to replace older and more expensive people. Or perhaps there is a miscommunication between the different functions.

 

Two Positive Signals

In May the S&P 600 small-cap index grew 4.87%, slightly better than the S&P 500, both without dividends. If the market continues to rise on speculation, the 600 will be the leader. In May, seven of eleven sectors in the 600 did better than the 500.

 

Small banks, contrary to their larger brethren, sharply increased their purchases of mortgages on commercial real estate. Local banks quite possibly have a better feel for local real estate value than larger banks, which are hundreds to thousands of miles away.

 

Some Investment Managers Can Repeat Being First among Peers.

The London Stock Exchange Group has continued the Lipper Analytical practice of tracking the best performing mutual funds for periods as short as one month through 10 years.

 

This weekend I reviewed what is usually the toughest competition for the eight periods. Eight is listed as the denominator to the extent the category existed for all eight periods, otherwise a smaller number is listed.  (Year to date, 1 & 3 months, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years). I then looked for fund houses that had two or more entries. The data below shows the results of the major peer groups.

                   # of Repeaters

Peer Groups       Winners   Losers

Large-Cap Growth    6/8       6/8   

Large-Cap Core      4/8       4/8        

Large-Cap Value     6/8       5/8

Multi-Cap Growth    3/8       7/8

Multi-Cap Core      5/8       2/8

Multi-Cap Value     5/7       0/7

Mid-Cap Growth      4/8       3/8

Mid-Cap Core        5/8       4/8

Mid-Cap Value       7/8       2/8

Small-Cap Growth    5/7       4/7

Small-Cap Core      6/8       6/8

Small-Cap Value     8/8       3/8

 

Remember, I was looking for repeaters in terms of fund management companies, as there are fund name changes and portfolio manager changes over 10 years. Additionally, portfolio managers can manage two or more funds. The winners tend to stay with their portfolios, although markets rotate. The losers change portfolios in an attempt to get off the bottom, if they still have a job.

 

A Sign of the Times

Due to a money shortage, the Department of Labor announced it is planning to reduce the number of inputs to their surveys starting in 2025.

 

 

Question: What should we be watching?        

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Markets are Fragmenting - Weekly Blog # 839

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Rhyme Curse -Weekly Blog # 838

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Most Dangerous Message - Weekly Blog # 837

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Investment Markets are Fragmenting - Weekly Blog # 839

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Investment Markets are Fragmenting

Flows Going to Potentially Higher Risk

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

   

Why the Fragmentation?

The answer is simple, salespeople make money by getting investors to make investment choices. At the institutional level commissions have totally disappeared, and the same largely applies at the retail level too. However, “vigorish” is alive and well, just with different names for spreads, underwriting fees, and management fees. Passive clients may decide at some future point that management fees are not worth it.

 

A valuable client is one that is actively investing and directly or indirectly aiding in getting new active clients.  The value of a client occurs either through the flow of new money or the reallocation of the portfolio. The marketing agent is consequently a bit of a worrier when communicating with clients. Furthermore, there is a desire to introduce new investment ideas, particularly new types of securities or new investment markets. The marketer will often present him or herself, or their firm, as more knowledgeable than the client. Thus, the marketer can dominate the client more than they expect.

 

Performing Better with More Risk

What follows is a brief discussion of current possible ploys that might be suggested. In truth these ideas might be sound if executed when not so popular. If peers already hold positions in the new play, their length of time to the eventual peak and subsequent major decline is shorter.

 

There are a very limited number of investors who have trading skills, and that does not include me. Most successful investors hold a relatively small number of holdings for many years. These are the types of investors who own Berkshire Hathaway with the goal of transferring assets to heirs after they are gone. (I am one.)

 

Until perhaps this week, James Mackintosh a Wall Street Journal columnist, noted that “Four giant tech stocks added more market value than all other stocks in the S&P 500 for the last month.” I suspect many investors were enticed to buy those four stocks. Unfortunately for them, the only class of stocks to rise for the week ended Thursday were small caps. regardless of growth, core, or value orientation.

 

Many individual and institutional investors have portfolios consisting of stocks listed on the NYSE, usually with dividends. These investors might be enticed to invest in NASDAQ listed stocks due to the greater number of tech stocks. There is a belief that most short-term NASDAQ traders are better than those playing on the big board. In the latest week only 23% of NYSE volume fell, compared to 42% on NASDAQ.

 

The fastest growing asset class today is Private Investments, either individually or through funds. As is often the case, the biggest risk is not the issuer, but other holders. The sponsors of private debt and equity do not have an obligation to buy back securities, except at the terminal date. The secondary market is very limited, and prices favor professional dealers.

 

Jaime Dimon, CEO and Chair of JP Morgan Chase is worried about inevitable investment mistakes in the privates. Although he does not see a structural problem, I think there potentially is one for two reasons.

1. These securities are being sold to individual investors. When the public loses money, they often complain to the media and members of congress who are always pro regulation.
2. There are very few pension funds still operating. Many have promised fixed returns to government employees, which includes teachers. For years these plans have used interest rates much lower than current rates, many of which have been bought from insurance companies. I believe some insurance companies will go bankrupt if interest rates stay at current levels or go higher, with the retirement burden falling on taxpayers. Politicians are probably better at getting the feds to change regulations. A guaranteed payment funded by a variable (market) sensitive vehicle is dangerous.

 

What are Your Thoughts?

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Rhyme Curse -Weekly Blog # 838

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Most Dangerous Message - Weekly Blog # 837

Mike Lipper's Blog: Trade, Invest, and/or Sell - Weekly Blog # 836

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.