Rhymes + Future Opportunities - Weekly Blog # 942

  

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Rhymes + Future Opportunities

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

           

Truths

From the beginning of human evolution, elders have instructed the young with real and imagined tales of history. For the most part, the speakers were survivors or were protected by survivors. The smarter of the young learned two things, histories tend to repeat, but not exactly. This is where the rhyming came in. Only the very smartest of the young learned that there were tales by losers. To continue being a living survivor the truth in many cases was disguised, as it was more threatening than going into combat. Many passed on their knowledge of events through playwrights, actors, singers, producers/directors and students of the past as made-up dramas.

 

It is too bad that most historical dramas are not taught with a deep understanding of the politics and economics of the day. Matter of fact, that is probably how a skilled professor should teach economics. There is a risk in doing so, as we prefer tales of winning rather than why things happen. Notice that today major TV programs and theatrical productions are produced by organizations dependent on others for capital and licenses.

 

With that as perspective, please look at William Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice. By the time he produced the play he was a favorite of the British Crown. From an economic point of view the play was opposed to the creation of debt and the timing optionality of repaying debt in unfortunate times. Now, substitute the crown for the debtor in borrowing large sums of money for war making purposes.

 

Does that ring a bell with the current President, who is a personal user of debt and urges businesses to delay recouping wrongly structured tariffs? The bigger problem is that most nations are similarly staying in power by doing somewhat similar things. They are behaving as other members of society do, e.g. businesses, non-profits (particularly universities and hospitals), and retail individuals. In business courses we should teach the proper way to create, manage, and use debt. (I don’t think it is taught at Wharton, where the President attended, or perhaps he didn’t take the class.)

 

The Growing Problem

The following are statements from others related to the problem:

• Barron’s - “Higher bond yields provide competition for stocks.”
• The CBO predicts a federal budget deficit of 5.8% in 2026 and 6.1% for the entire next decade.
• “JP Morgan looks to reduce exposure to $4 Billion in private equity-linked loans.”

 

Longer-Term Opportunities

After the debt problem has been delt with, I look forward to a favorable period for equity investing. The following are brief comments that show some hope for gains.

 

Earlier this year the only mutual funds enjoying substantial gains were precious metals funds and those invested in “AI”. Currently, performance leadership has broadened out to industrials, some financials, and some international stocks traded beyond our borders. Currently, the mutual fund averages in twenty-five sectors out of one hundred and five are doing better than the average S&P 500 index fund.

 

The Financial Times discussed the investment success of Chris Hohn, a very successful British hedge fund manager. In many ways his portfolio is like the portfolio Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger put together, in terms of its concentrated positions. However, Chris Hohn excluded some industries from his portfolio that Berkshire had used in the past, like banks, utilities, media, and insurance. Both he and Berkshire Hathaway (*) like monopolies and duopolies and spend a great deal of time studying the barriers to entry for the companies.

* Stock owned by personal and investment accounts

 

One of the largest industries critical to the health of the world is the healthcare industry, which is selling at its lowest price since 2000. This is a difficult industry for me to directly invest in. Picking the winner requires a good understanding of what is being developed in their own and competing laboratories as well as the rules likely to be issued by various government agencies. The way we participate is by using mutual funds that have appropriately qualified staff.

 

One stock we own for the next bull market is Korn Ferry (*), a leader in employment management. We see it an “ultimate income” play for “AI” layoffs. It has a medium yield.

* Stock owned by personal and investment accounts

 

We are looking for more stocks for the next “bull market”.

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Many Trends Within the Same Market - Weekly Blog # 941

Mike Lipper's Blog: What Can Go Wrong - Weekly Blog # 940

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Weekend’s Learning Sources - Weekly Blog # 939

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

This Weekend’s Learning Sources - Weekly Blog # 939

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

This Weekend’s Learning Sources

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Identifying sources of learning

One of the main differences between us and most animals is that our brains are larger, which hopefully means we can learn more. The end of this week supplied three sources of learning. The three teams of instructors were: Tim Cook (Steve Jobs), Berkshire Hathaway’s Annual Meeting with shareholders (Warren Buffett/Charlie Munger and Greg Able), and the Bettors and Horses at the Kentucky Derby. From each I can learn a lot. Matter of fact, each could be a whole semester at Business Schools instead of what they are currently teaching.

 

Tim Cook (Steve Jobs)

At the end of the so-called work week Tim Cook conducted what was his last quarterly meeting for shareholders and analysts of Apple (*). He focused on the company’s critical relationships with customers and what is owed to them. He stressed what Steve Jobs taught, the betterment of the users’ lives. These were the critical thoughts passed onto the oncoming new President of Apple. We should pass these views onto all we deal with, focusing less on what they paid us and more on what we did for them.

* Owned in personal and client accounts.

 

Warren Buffett/ Charlie Munger & Greg Able

Mr. Buffett spoke to many of the shareholders attending the annual Berkshire Hathaway (*) meeting, both in person and electronically. His advice for people reaching 50 years or older was to switch their primary investment focus from making money to capital preservation. He emphasized saying no, particularly to not well understood new investments. (I do not own any “AI” stocks directly, but there are many in mutual funds I own. The key to their future is what they have yet to produce, not what they are selling today.) He believes investors in retirement should prune their holdings and try to explain what they own to their heirs, feeling it is more beneficial to focus on how the inheritance should be used rather than the intricacies of what is owned.

* Owned in personal and client accounts.

 

Greg Able is the new President of the company and is focused on improving the operations of the company. When the talented Chief Financial Officer transitions into retirement, he will be replaced with both a CFO and a new lawyer. Furthermore, for the 31 private companies owned by Berkshire, he has appointed a trusted internal executive as leader. Instead of doing just financial oversight, he will be reviewing the operations of the formerly private companies. Good policies of the past will be reviewed to see if they are right for now.

 

My personal view is that there are two major trends which we did not have to deal with in the past, but which could be much more important in the future. The first is one of the causes of financial and economic cyclicality resulting from not repaying debt on time and at full value. Defaults on debt have led to depressions in the past and have been the cause of unplanned contractions.

 

In the decade of the 1920s into the early 1930s society encouraged the global extension of debt at the retail level, including its use as a defense against tariffs (Smoot Hawley).  Currently, we have an expanded federal debt led by someone who needed to renegotiate his own debt. Our government encourages investing retirement capital in debt. The national debt is larger than the GNP. (Old debt has a due date, while GNP is produced each year.)

 

The second dangerous trend is the value of the dollar in world trade. As debt grows, overseas investors value it less. Meaning, it not only becomes more expensive for funding our debt, but also for paying for imports of food, clothing, and raw materials. We are better positioned than many other countries who are in worst shape, but not all. Asia, which has a younger population and a disciplined workforce, is in better shape. Higher inflation leads to lower long-term value of the currency. One measure of inflation not issued by our overworked government is the ECRI Index of Industrial Prices, which was up 140.35% this week for the last 52 weeks.  

 

Kentucky Derby

I brought this on myself by stating that I learned the basic tenants of analysis at the New York Racetracks. A subscriber asked who I was betting on in the race. Where do I begin? Perhaps with two axioms. First, as with most things in life, short answers are often wrong. The short answers are wrong because they are stated without limits and conditions. That brings us to the second axiom, I don’t like losing. I don’t like losing because it is a double loss. The first loss is the sum wagered, and the second is the loss of funds necessary for future betting and other things.

 

There are two negatives against betting at the track. First, the track takes a cut of all bets and there are personal expenses of travel, admissions, and food. Second, as a game of chance it is rigged because of the track’s take. Additionally, winnings are taxable at federal and state levels. There is still another drawback, about 30% to 50% of the time the lowest yielding horse wins. Most of the time those winnings are not large enough to offset losses and expenses incurred. I address this problem by limiting the number of times I bet, usually 3 out of 9 races and rarely at the lowest odds. The advantage of this approach is staying away from betting at the lowest odds, which are the most popular horses.

 

If these issues did not cause you to find other things to bet on, the elements of the Derby might. First, the race is only for three-year-old horses. While horses are born for the record throughout the year, under racing law all horses are born on January 1st. Some horses start their racing history at 2 years old, but many do not. By the time they are three years old they are adolescent. (From a scientific standpoint it would be useful to know the actual date of birth. There is poor but available information as to the number of official races the horse has run. In terms of the Derby, the range I heard was 1 to 4 races.) For those of my age, I am reluctant to take adolescent horses and most humans seriously.

 

So, after all this I did not place a bet on this year’s Derby. Most of the time I am not interested in races for three-year olds that are run any earlier than June, which starts with the Belmont Stakes race. These races are also a bit suspect because the course has been altered.

 

I would not have bet on the winner this year. However, the trainer deserves to be congratulated as she was the first woman trainer to win the Derby. The night before she had a dam which won the Kentucky Oaks with the same jockey who won the Kentucky Derby. Quite an accomplishment.

 

All of this shows I am still a student and hope you are as well.

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Watch Out for the Four - Weekly Blog # 938

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors’ Interlude - Weekly Blog # 937

Mike Lipper's Blog: Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution - Weekly Blog # 936

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

 

         

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Diversification

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                                                                        

 

Preface

On a recent trip to London, Ruth and I attended a private fund and friend raising concert for the Academy of St. Martin’s in the Fields (ASMF), where Ruth is the first American trustee. The wonderful music was performed by Joshua Bell, the artistic director, and five other top-notch string musicians from the ASMF. Between the six talented musicians they played three different types of string instruments, alternating between lead and ensemble roles. The result was a successful combination of each of their talents.

 

Even when listening to a magnificent concert performance, I cannot forget my investment responsibilities. As individual musicians alternated from leading to supporting roles, it reminded me of what individual securities should do in a diversified long-term investment portfolio.

 

Application to Portfolio Management

In 1940 the SEC completed their depression-oriented reform rules. Among the last of these was the Investment Company Act of 1940, which unlike the other six regulations was not formed at their SEC headquarters. It was produced at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington by lawyers for the fund industry from Boston, New York (where the industry’s trade association was headquartered), Philadelphia, and Washington. Considering their recent experience of the market falling during the Depression, the mood of the meeting was to try reduce the chance of big future declines. The best model for that were state laws governing trust accounts, using generations of work by Boston and Philadelphia lawyers. (Even as late as the early 1960s a few Boston law firms had professional securities analysts on staff to assist in managing trust accounts.) Note, the main concern of the creators of fund regulation was the avoidance of losses. No word was spoken of making money on investments.

 

They thought the best way to reduce the chance of major losses was to limit an account’s exposure to any single investment. This led to limiting the percentage amount that funds could invest in any one stock, which usually meant no more than 5% of the voting stock at cost (not market). To this very day, most equity funds are labeled as diversified if they adhere to this principal.

 

The Problem with Voting Stock Limits

The biggest penalty paid by investors is not losses, but the absence of profits. Mutual Funds with long histories often make ten, twenty, or even more times as much on some of their holdings, which more than covers a small number of losses. Furthermore, great fortunes have been made, particularly over successive generations, in single stock portfolios or portfolios having a small number of investments.

 

For Professional Investors

The concept of risk management is critical but doing it by name or percentage of voting shares does not reduce risk, it may increase if all investments are exposed to a single concept. In the late nineteenth century professional investors considered concentration to be the best and safest way to invest. My college degree is from Columbia University, which had an endowment fully invested in railroad bonds and stocks, every single one file for bankruptcy. Today there is a risk that some participants in the “AI” surge could produce similar results by investing in too much in a good thing.

 

For publicly traded securities I suggest the biggest risks is with the stock owner and not the issuer, as they will be sellers of the stock before you do. Other risks include countries, technology, politics, and management. These can be identified as short-term and long-term factors. A possible short-term indicator is slightly more participants being bearish than bullish in the latest American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey of expectations for the next six months. Interestingly, the long-term indicator was Friday’s announcement by the Supreme Court, which ruled against the President’s authority to set tariffs using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which had very little to any impact on the market.

 

Bottom line, watch the musicians play and how well they work together, both with other musicians and staff, but also watch the reaction of the audience.

 

Understanding Going Global

In a recent conversation with a London-based fund manager, who in the past was almost completely invested in the US but now has a growing position in European stocks. While he has the biggest portion of his portfolio in US securities, he is very risk aware and expresses this by augmenting his portfolio with European stocks. Normally, he expects his US positions to outperform his European positions, but not in a declining market. In terms of P/E, Free Cash Flow, Dividend Yield, and other value measures, European stocks are less risky than US holdings.

 

 Another careful investor was Charlie Munger, who listed six principles to be avoided: High Financial Leverage, High Operating Leverage, Negative Cashflow, Poor Governance, High Risk of Obsolescence, No Competitive Advantage vs. a Strong Competitor.

 

Share your thoughts

                

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

Mike Lipper's Blog: Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

Mike Lipper's Blog: Do Current Prices Lead Future Markets? - Weekly Blog # 926

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Failed Expectations: Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips - Weekly Blog # 925

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Failed Expectations

Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Was this the week that was?

Last week’s blog anticipated a ruling by the US Supreme Court on the Presidential use of Executive Orders to impose tariffs on countries and products. It was further expected that the President would use substitute measures to accomplish similar goals if he loses the Supreme Court case. Additionally, there was a belief that the government would be forced to repay the existing tariffs to the American people (voters). The new tariffs would probably cause some changes by foreign nations. None of this happened.

 

Instead, the major topic of conversation at the World Economic Forum at Davos was Greenland. Discussions moved at lightening or Trump speed from a military occupation to a not fully disclosed peaceful agreement with NATO forces by the end of the week. The importance of these dramatic changes reminds us of what may be topic one in developing future investment strategies. All of this brief history shows how wrong we can be. What we missed was the significant price level change that occurred this week.

 

Critical Price Changes

Starting with the least followed ECRI industrial price index, which normally moves ploddingly. The index rose to 126.28 from the prior week’s 120.49. The jump raised the year-over-year gain to 6.58%, which is greater than the various inflation measures the Fed and many others use. I would not be surprised to see industrial buyers of products add this amount to their resale prices, after adding an insurance amount to protect their profits against further prices increases.

 

One explanation of ECRI prices can be found in the weekly price chart in the weekend Wall Street Journal, which showed Natural Gas rising +70.0% and Silver +14.57% for the week. Part of these increases could be for increased use of these items in the normal course of business. However, I suspect some of the increased demand comes from trading and/or gambling interests, either on the long side or from covering short positions. The importance of the last sentence is that the size of the trading and gambling sectors is growing, and I believe it’s already quite large.

 

The third price increase impacts all of us in our daily purchase of goods and services. It is the value of the dollar. On Friday the 16th of January the US dollar index was 99.395, one week later it was 97.599. The President has threatened foreign countries if they sell US assets!! (I personally believe this won’t happen, but it shows a sensitivity to the value of the dollar, even though Trump and Xi have both advocated for a lower value of their currencies as mercantilists.)

 

Warning

I have already indicated how wrong I can be. Please be careful in developing your own investment strategy and make changes slowly, not abruptly.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923 Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Is This The Week That Ends Instability?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 Preface

I believe it was Lenin who said there are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen. Possibly, the four-day trading week beginning this coming Tuesday is such a period. In both the Financial Times and her podcast, Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab* introduced the concept of the period we are going through as an extended period of instability. I am suggesting it is possible the beginning of the end of this period may have begun.

*Shares held in in managed and personal accounts.

 

Fund Data Sets the Table

Whether one invests in mutual funds or not, one should recognize that not only do many people invest in them, but more importantly, many fund managers get their training at fund shops. Thus, one can get an understanding of the institutional mind set by looking at fund data. In the five years ended last Thursday, the London Stock Exchange Group published my old firm’s weekly study of 105 equity related mutual fund peer-groups average performances.

 

The average performance of S&P 500 Index funds was 14.05% compounded for the past five years.  There were only five peer group averages that were better: Precious Metals Equity Funds +21.50%, Energy MLP Funds +20.79%, Commodities Precious Metals Funds +18.75%, Natural Resources Funds +17.30%, and Global Natural Resources Funds +16.05%.  There were just two better performing thematic categories, precious metals and energy. The narrowness of performance leadership proves how difficult it was to pick winners for the past five years. The leadership crown was indeed unstable.

 

Another way to identify the instability in economic data is to examine the tails of the best and worst 2 items shown in Saturday’s WSJ weekly price chart. The best was Silver +11.67% and the second best was the KOPSI +5.55%. The second worst price performance was Financials -2.33%, which was half as bad as Corn -4.71%, the worst performer. The gaps between the top two leaders and laggards suggest concentration is at play.

 

Turning Points Possible Next Week

On Tuesday, probably in the late afternoon, SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the US) is expected to announce its decision on the IEEPA tariff. The President has said he is prepared for an unfavorable ruling and has substitute measures in mind. At best this will be disruptive, and possibly inflationary. The ECRI industrial price index, which is normally slow moving, rose to 120.49% from the prior week’s level of 117.42%.

 

Markets are anticipating problems, either from Tariffs or possibly Iran. Sixty-two percent of the stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rose last week, while only fifty-three percent rose on the NASDAQ. The NASDAQ trades more tech stocks and the shares of younger companies. Thus, the junior exchange is likely to react more than the “Big Board” to news events. Retail investors, when not gambling, are more active on the junior market. One possible measure of this is the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey, which reported 49.5% bullish for the next six months, up from 42.5% the prior week. What may be more significant is the 28.2% that were bearish. Many professional traders believe “the public” is wrong at turning points.

 

The Davos meeting begins Tuesday, with many political and economic leaders present and chatting. One doesn’t know what will be discussed and how meaningful the meetings will be.

 

Keep us Informed as to any Changes in Your Views.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

 

 

Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Data May Be Signaling Change

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Preface

I came to my desk Saturday morning and was prepared to begin writing this week’s blog. My thought pattern suggested we were quite possibly in a pivot period, with market leadership shifting to foreign priced securities priced substantially below “AI” securities. Then I paid attention to Bloomberg television, which is on 24 hours a day. I was mesmerized by the news on the raid on Caracas, the capital of Venezuela. The daring and skills involved were impressive and the growing implications are disturbing.

 

Normally, I try to view everything from a global perspective, as I believe almost all we do has roots in the global world. However, for this week’s blog I am not going to deal with the longer-term implications of the successful raid and capture of indicted criminals. It is too early to tell. I expect these events will create global shadows which I will address in future blogs. The world listens but does not necessarily follow the U.S

 

Pivoting to the Data

 

Last Two Weeks of 2025

Each of the last two trading weeks, including January 2nd, have had only four trading days of relatively light trading volume. A disproportionate number of trades were either tax motivated, or position statement driven. Nevertheless, they share traits with many earlier days of December’s trading, with more stocks sold on minus ticks than rising prices. It is worth noting that the popular stock market indices generally rose a small amount. This highlights the dichotomy in the market between what many believe are retail driven indices and a broader, slower-moving institutional market. I am guessing many retirement and other long-term institutions were relatively quiet in the last part of 2025.

 

This institutional hesitation mirrors the large corporations’ labor practices, where many companies spend considerable amounts training new employees, which they consider assets. They are therefore reluctant to fire many employees and are slow to hire new workers. Some believe in the “promise of “AI”, where in the not-too-distant future companies will need less employees to produce the same or more sales. Consequently, many employers are not hiring new employees, other than critical replacements.

 

Typically, corporations begin investing new capital into their retirement plans in January, be it pension or 401-k accounts. The institutional advisory community has counted on this flow in the past. My guess, it may be smaller this year. We will see.  

 

Prices and Inflation

There were two lessons on prices in the Weekend Edition of The Wall Street Journal, which measures 72 traded items each week. Only 24 prices or one-third were up, and 48 prices were down. Are we peaking? The second lesson from these data is that markets deal with both extreme momentary shortages and slower moving prices, which are more common. One analytical technique I use to differentiate them is to examine the top and bottom two prices. On the upside is Comex Silver +142.34% and Platinum +127.57%. On the downside are Orange Juice -58.75% and Cocoa -48.05%. I believe these four are special imbalances, as the third extreme prices are the KOSPI composite +75.63% and the Argentine Peso -28.96%. The gaps between the extremes and third ranking are large. Much smaller but concerning nevertheless is the one-week industrial prices gain of +1.28% in the ECRI weekly index, suggesting inflation is not under control.

 

The Key Link

If there were a single suggestion of a world view of the US economy, it would be the value of the US dollar. The Financial Times headline “Dollar Is Wild Card in 2026”. This UK publication, now owned by the Japanese newspaper/wire service giant, is a traditional critic of the US. The value of the dollar is dependent on two factors, the value of the other major currencies and the price of the dollar. In 2025, numerous foreign markets have for the first time in many years appreciated more than the US. Currencies, like securities, are priced at their perceived future value. Not only is the US government spending more than it is earning through taxes and tariffs, but it’s also expected by many to continue to do so in the future. (Even if tariffs bring in a lot of money, part of the receipts are expected to be paid to citizens instead of being used to pay our debts.) In addition, both President Trump and Chairman Yi have stated they would both like their currencies to decline. Some weakness in the dollar may have been caused by individual and institutional investors selling dollars to buy foreign securities.

 

What to Do?

Examine whether it is prudent to have 100% of your long-term investment money in securities that are traded primarily in dollars? Is it time to pivot?

 

Share your thoughts, please.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Investment Time Horizon Should Pick

How You Measure the Results

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

Current Situation

Billions of people invest directly or indirectly in US securities markets, with each having somewhat different motivations and thoughts about what they are doing. Since we don’t know these people and the way they think, we simply group them into buckets. I have found the intended investment period often defines how they invest and for what period.

 

My outlook is of someone who has served families and institutions, and I tend to think long-term for them. As most money invested in mutual funds is largely for retirement and most institutions are designed to pay out their assets over an extended period of many years, they too have a long-term time horizon. (Unfortunately, this focus on the long term does not come with a knowledge of what the future will bring in terms of risks and rewards.)

 

The media concentrates on “news” and fills space with the current chatter about the present and the next expected announcement of note. Most security salespeople and money managers believe potential investors are primarily interested in the present and that is the focus of their sales pitches.

 

These two different focuses have led to two very different market structures. The hyper action-oriented players dwell on any market development that leads to a move in stock prices. They celebrate the percentage gains of interim results and prognostications. Those who use securities to meet future payments are concerned about anything that might reduce these payments in terms of future purchasing power. A possible tell-tale signal of a threat is the sale of securities by supposedly knowledgeable investors.

 

This is the tug of war between those seeking near-terms rewards and those worrying about the loss of worth of some future payment. To satisfy both camps the stock exchanges publish the volume of shares sold at higher and lower prices and the number of issues which rose and fell each trading day.

 

In the latest week there were only four trading days and one of those was half a day. On the last day the volume of shares traded on the NYSE was down by approximately 2/3rds and by approximately one half on the NASDAQ*. (In the current market environment, I pay more attention to the NASDAQ, as it has risen the most this year due to having more “Tech” companies, whose stock prices are more volatile than those on “The Big Board”. On Monday the 4 indicators were larger for the NASDAQ and on Tuesday the NYSE saw better results. This see-saw pattern has occurred frequently throughout the year.) For the week, 65 % of NASDAQ stocks rose in price vs 61% for the NYSE.

*Client and personal accounts own shares in NASDAQ.

 

In terms of looking at the future there were two interesting notices. The Conference Board Consumer Sentiment Survey was 89.1% vs 92.9% the prior month. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) saw a drop in bullish sentiment for the next six months in their sample survey, dropping to 37.4% from 44.1% the prior week.

 

Understanding the Measure

Most of the chatter about this change focused on the percentage change from the period immediately prior. However, there is another way to look at the results, the way an actuary would in determining the chance of a certain event happening. This is done by reviewing the entire history of the statistical sample, including any possible period where that event could reappear and at what frequency. For example, one chance out of fifty years, or every 84 months, or something similar. History traced through geological discoveries has recorded cycles of expansions and contractions with some regularity. It is much easier with regular barter or the development of money.

 

Said simply, when there is a shortage of supply over the level of demand, prices go up. When there is more supply than demand, prices drop. Climate also impacts agriculture, as does the effort of humans. The supply of money was a recent concern, which has more recently shifted to concerns about the supply of credit and certain natural resources. In all cases, it is the imbalance of critical items which moves prices to a point of excess, which causes a reversal.

 

Small reversals happen more frequently than large ones, often occurring within a single presidential term. However, small reversals periodically stretch over two or conceivably three terms. In trying to avoid or stop small declines, the application of well-meaning changes can trigger bigger declines, which we label depressions.

 

Addressing the economic hardships caused by the cost of fighting WWI led to an extended period of debt expansion, which initially hurt the farming communities. This led to the application of tariffs to protect small banks which extended loans to over expanded farmers and farm equipment dealers in critically important mid-western senate seats. Simultaneously, the public became enamored with the use of credit in an already highly priced stock market.

 

The market crash of 1929 caused many people to lose money in margin accounts, along with many of their brokers. The market reached a bottom in 1931, but people were scared by what had happened. In 1932 they elected FDR as President as a protector of the banks, and he closed all the banks in 1933 in an attempt to restructure society. Even though FDR lost most of his battles with the Constitution and the Courts, he initiated various government agencies that mismanaged the economy until we entered WWII, which he helped start in both the Pacific and Atlantic. The US recovered slowly after the war and subsequent Korean Conflict, although some stocks listed on the NYSE did not reach their 1929 highs until the mid-1960s with the discounted dollar.

 

Semi Parallels Today

There has been an expansion of debt both at the federal and individual level, with bankruptcies currently rising. At the same time, prudent constraints on the financial community have been reduced or eliminated. Additionally, we have an underequipped military, including Navy, Air, Space, and Coast Guard not ready for a multi-front war.

 

Conclusion:

We don’t know when the next decline will happen, or if the depth of the decline will morph into a depression. However, we should resist being fully exposed to rising gains in the non-public market while we experience a stagnant private economy. It is possible gains achieved in 2026 may be expensive in the long run, so be careful.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

Mike Lipper's Blog: On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Are Investors Seeing a Change?

Politicos Are Not

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Was the latest week instructive?

During the low volume week: the DJIA fell -0.51%, the S&P 500 fell -1.07% and the NASDAQ fell -1.69%. One does not know a trend is over until a meaningful reversal of direction has occurred, which quite possibly was the case this week. On the NASDAQ there were more decliners than gainers, unlike the “Big Board” where there were more gainers. However, since the April 8th bottom, the NASDAQ Composite Index has led the US general stock market, gaining +51.92% compared to +37.02% for the S&P 500 and +28.72% for the DJIA.

 

The supporters of the political party that currently occupies leadership in both chambers and the White House cheer these recoveries but appear to ignore other data. For example, real private non-residential fixed income investments, excluding data centers, have been flat since 2020 and is far behind 2023 prices.

 

The Real Problem is Bad Debt Creation

For the “bulls” to be proven right, a large portion of the public’s uninvested money must be corralled to invest in the economy, in sufficient amounts necessary to generate the tax revenues required to support government spending and address the growth of the deficit. Instead, they are doing this by removing the Controller of the Currency and the leverage lending guidelines of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which they felt were too restrictive. To add more fuel to risk capital they are encouraging retail investors to put some of their retirement income savings into private debt investments, even though there has been an increase in bankruptcies over the last four years.

 

Economic Tailwinds

Optimist believe the economy should have the wind at its back in 2026 due to the following positive events resulting from the “Big Beautiful Bill”. However, it remains to be seen whether these events translate into additional stock market gains or if these events are already reflected in current market prices. Some of these events could also be negatively impacted by Supreme Court decisions on tariffs.

• A relatively large number of taxpayers will see tax reductions in 2026, with some seeing tax refunds early in the year.
• Reduced regulations should decrease the cost of doing business and speed up the introduction of products to market.
• The reshoring commitment of over $18 trillion in manufacturing capacity should boost construction and the jobs required for that task.
• AI capacity construction should continue throughout most of 2026.
• Energy capacity construction will likely increase in 2026, with the introduction of small-scale nuclear power and construction of a new natural gas pipeline from Pennsylvania to New York.
• The House of Representatives passed a $900 billion military budget, which includes pay raises and an increase in defense spending. This bill still needs to go through the Senate before it becomes law. Some of these funds will be used to retool the military for modern warfare, which includes increased use of AI and unmanned vehicles.

Various underwriters are predicting that equity markets will generate double digit rates of return. On a long-term basis this is extremely difficult to do and can only be achieved by accepting the risk of periodic losses. By year end the year the S&P 500 Index could see its third consecutive year of annual gains exceeding 20%. Only once, from 1995-1998, has the market seen a 4-year period of consecutive annual gains of 20%.

 

Bottom line: Be Careful

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

Mike Lipper's Blog: Was it the week that wasn’t? - Weekly Blog # 917

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions - Weekly Blog # 916

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Signals of Change in Historic Patterns

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Past Trends May Not Predict Future

There are times when using an old playbook is dangerous because the game has changed.

 

Inputs of Change

1. China overtook the US as Germany’s largest trading partner (fear of US tariffs?).
2. Meta cuts 600 jobs in their AI division.
3. Market rally is being led by low quality.
4. Consumer sentiment fell to 53.6 from 55.1 the prior month
5. Home ownership 40% more costly than renting. Will it change?

 

Other structural questions:

1. Is political power out of balance? IBES estimates 3rd quarter eps to be 10.4% and net income 8.8%, which to use?
2. Will later marriages and down-sizing earlier reduce demand for homes?
3. Will China follow the US in reducing competition through merger or bankruptcy? (autos/paints/investment and commercial banks/private capital).

 

Will we change schooling into education of life and business skills to help solve our problems.

 

Disclosure:

My personal portfolio of domestic and international securities assumes some of the answers to these questions. I could be wrong.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural - Weekly Blog # 909

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Where Are US Stock Prices Going?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Time to Achieve

The old rule for publishers regarding future projections is to never state both a target number and a date certain. However, the result of that warning is a relatively useless projection for planning current actions. Unfortunately, I have views on both the target number and approximate timing, although neither are precise nor tied together. In this blog I share my thoughts with the hope that some are of value, and our trusted readers will share what they think are reasonable answers.

 

As a racetrack trained analyst, I believe the odds favor the US stock market reaching a multi-year peak in the foreseeable future. Consequently, my grandchildren and great-grandchildren will likely see nominal gains in their assets long-term. Careful readers will quickly surmise that I must have mixed views regarding my children’s market wealth prospects. Their results will be heavily influenced by their controlled spending and financial diligence, and what they want to leave to their heirs.

 

Current Market Dilemma

Most of the time a single investment attitude drives market prices. Today, there are two dominant thought patterns. The first is enthusiastic buyers who largely believe the President is in the process of restructuring the economy and therefore society. However, he is at a disadvantage of having only loyalists support him. (Loyalists generally do not pursue details of potential execution problems or even try to identify them to reduce political, functional, and court issues.) They think things are going well.

 

The second group is reluctant to make decisive decisions in the market. The $8 trillion in money market funds is one measure of their non-acceptance of things going well. Cash or similar investments are both a repository for normal operating reserves and future buying pools.

 

Incomplete Evidence

• Tariff impact: Consumers 55%, importers 22%, foreign producers 18%, and 5% evaded. (I suspect until tariffs are removed consumers will pay at least 90% of them, either in aggregate prices and/or in quality/quantitative shrinkage.)
• While the media and uninformed public focus on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) volume and prices, they are missing a critical change in stock market structure. The year-over-year share volume has increased 40.88% for the NYSE and 80.55% for the NASDAQ, effectively double. (To some degree the NASDAQ volume includes inter-dealer trades to restore trading inventory positions.) Sometimes the two markets act differently. For example, on Friday the NYSE volume of advancing prices rose, as did total volume from Thursday. However, NASDAQ activity was the opposite, with lower volume and more decliners than gainers. A larger measure of the market is the Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500), which is very near an all-time high.
• In the weekly survey sample of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII), the percentage of respondents predicting a bullish market for the next six months dropped to 33.7%, while those predicting a bearish market rose to 46.1%. Just three weeks ago the ratios were 42.9% vs 39.2% in favor of the bulls.
• The current market and political situation resemble those of the late 1920s, which led to both the recession and depression. Both started with an overall increase in debt at the individual and business level. This was particularly true in the politically sensitive farm community, which was suffering from a change in foreign demand for its crops. (This time it’s a Chinese decline in demand for soybeans.) Small and medium-sized banks were having loan payment problems, which then led to imposing tariffs on foreign products and services. The current Federal Reserve Board is very conscious of this history.
• Another parallel is certain foreign governments recognizing the relative weakness of America and taking advantage of the situation by threatening further actions. This week Ruth and I spent time with the leaders of the US Marine Corps University who are preparing for a future different than the past. Similar efforts occurred before WWI and WWII, suggesting investors should think about structural changes to their investment policies.

 

Building a larger cash opportunity reserve may make sense. What do you think?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural - Weekly Blog # 909

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tactical Headlines Show Strategic Clues - Weekly Blog # 908

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

A Good Time to Sell?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 Selling is More Important

When an investor, distinct from a trader, asks me if they should sell some portion or all of their holdings, I first try to determine the critical time period in judging the results of the action. If one is persuaded by media voices the answer will usually be tomorrow or at the end of the calendar year. For me, it is when the money is expected to be needed. For example, for my newborn great grandchildren's retirement or the replacement of the new university dorm, it could be a 100-years. Another matrix could be the future low price point needed to protect future funding of a desired goal.

 

Regarding a future low price point, it is important to recognize that prices move in cycles. The important cycles can be labeled as seasonal, cyclical, secular, and structural. It is how I think of the latter part of last week’s drop in prices, where what I follow fell -15% to gains of +7%. To conserve your time and the blog's space I will comment on the year-to-date period for those impressed with media voices and include some other screens as well.

 

The first thing that hit me was the largest average gain of +15.94% in non-leveraged, diversified large growth mutual funds. These gains were driven by the biggest positions in technology stocks. However, they missed out by focusing on securities registered with the Securities Exchange Commission. After many years of SEC registered stocks performing very well, there were some foreign markets that generated much better performance multiples. The leading countries were Ghana +130.25%, Cyprus +94.75%, Luxembourg +74.8%, Greece +71.45%, Columbia +70.05%, Nigeria +65.1%, Korea +61.1%, South Africa +48.02%, China +32.85% and Chile +31.02%. Weekly Barron's performance charts showing 14 European and 7 Asian countries had 7 Asian and 4 European indices gaining. (As an analyst that has followed non-US stocks and invested in some, I believe this is a good time to examine these opportunities.)

 

Most Analysts Focus on Rising Stocks

I glanced at those stock prices not doing so well. For example, the Dow Jones Industrials (DJIA) and Dow Jones Transportation (DJTA) stocks fell -2.739 and -4.88% respectively for the week. Perhaps more importantly, their year-to-date performance results were +6.90% and -5.21% respectively. (This suggests the US goods economy is not doing well. Tariffs could be a problem. Freight movement is down for both the rail and truck business and may forecast Halloween and Christmas sales being behind earlier expectations.)

 

Down Prices = Opportunities

Three industry sectors are showing small declines on a year-to-date basis: Banks -4.26%, Insurance -1.64% and small companies -1.1%. Restrictions on all companies are the same, but small companies may be impacted more due to their staff size. To the extent the current administration reduces some of the regulatory overhead, it cou1d restore a competitive advantage to smaller companies. However, many restrictions on smaller financial and insurance companies appear to make it easier for new entrants.

 

AI, An Unrecognized National Problem

Some are beginning to comment on the absence of large profits from Artificial Intelligence companies due to lack of public discovery of relevant financial disclosure, so I will not. At a recent meeting hosted by the London Stock Exchange Group, one of their headline speakers noted that the challenge for the AI industry was to produce "more with less". It is well recognized that AI is taking over an unidentified number of job functions, reducing the need for human labor. Great! Where are these laid off people going to get jobs anywhere near similar wages? This could be a concern for future Administrations. 

 

The 4th Activist President

Just like Andrew Jackson and the two Roosevelts, President Trump is trying to solve various national problems by changing how they are handled. Some of these attempts will survive the Courts. What I am not seeing is how the restructuring of the economy will work. Looking at the aftereffects of prior activist Presidents, I suspect it will materially change the outlook for investments, something people are not currently focusing on.

 

I would like to know if anyone has any thoughts on what restructuring will mean to their investment orientation.

  

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tactical Headlines Show Strategic Clues - Weekly Blog # 908

Mike Lipper's Blog: Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not - Weekly Blog # 907

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.