Long-Term Money Via Telescope, Not Microscope - Weekly Blog # 951

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Long-Term Money Via Telescope,

Not Microscope

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Historical Perspective

One lesson from studying history, including geology, is guessing the very next move in a series, which is more likely to be random than consecutive. The news business is an exception, selling a detailed description of what just happened. For example, the weekend chronicles might point out that more stock prices went down than up for the latest week and did so with higher volume. They’ll mention that only 58% of the NYSE stocks declined for the week, including 38% on Friday, compared to the NASDAQ where 64% fell for the week and 55% fell on Friday. Not one of these pundits mention that in the earlier part of this year and most of last year a greater portion of the stocks traded on the NASDAQ rose. More importantly, these stocks were bought much more recently than those on the NYSE. This suggests that both the purchase and sale of the NASDAQ stocks were speculative, not long-term oriented investments.

 

Switching to the telescope for longer time periods. Long-term investors should focus on the changing structure of the US population, where more than 1.8 million people left the workforce (169 million in June 2026 vs 171 million in September 2025). Some of these people trade stocks and participate in the weekly sample survey of the American Association of the Individual Investors (AAII). This week they turned bearish on their outlook for the next six months, with only 29.6% now being bullish, down from 44.9% the prior week. Bearish beliefs have risen to 42.3% from 32.9% the prior week.

 

Investors have generally missed gains in some global and international funds, as well as commodity and alternative funds. To understand the current performance of diversified funds you need to recognize the increased concentration in a limited number of sectors. The history of making money in the stock market often goes along with being lonely during changing long-term future trends.

 

One advantage of devoting time to investing is occasionally seeing some occurrences replay. On Thursday there was the rescheduled White House Correspondents Dinner with the President speaking, which reminded me of my time as chair of the program committee of the New York Society of Security Analysts. I suggested to the President of the Society that we invite President Gerald Ford, the only non-elected president of the US to speak to the analysts. I was given permission to invite him, with the deep belief that it wouldn’t happen. I called the White House and spoke to the lead speech writer who thought it was a great idea, agreeing to speak to the higher authorities. Surprisingly, they were looking at opportunities for the President to speak to the financial community about his “Whip Inflation Now” or “WIN”. I was invited to visit the White House to meet with the speech writer and go over the President’s thoughts on the subject. It became clear that they didn’t really care about my political views, but what jokes would be appropriate. I rejected most of the jokes. Shortly thereafter President Ford came to our meeting quarters on Williams Street. He came with Alan Greenspan and Frank Zarb, who had just joined the Cabinet after a career of turning around several brokerage firms. A topic I would have liked to hear more about. When the President came to the NYSSA, he was the first President since George Washington to speak on “Wall Street” while still in office. He included all the proposed bad jokes.

 

When President Trump spoke to the correspondents this week, he also told jokes that did not go over well. It seems as if Presidents speak about what they want and not about what their audiences want to hear. Like many investors, they don’t learn from history.

 

Those of us who pay attention to future liabilities for clients and ourselves should focus on the long term. What do you think?    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Before Focusing on Shorter-Term Reactions - Weekly Blog # 950

Mike Lipper's Blog: Little Occurred During the Trading Week - Weekly Blog # 949

Mike Lipper's Blog: Searching for Future Long-Term Picks: Gathering Assets, Reasons to Search - Weekly Blog # 948

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Searching for Future Long-Term Picks: Gathering Assets, Reasons to Search - Weekly Blog # 948

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Searching for Future Long-Term Picks:

Gathering Assets, Reasons to Search

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

 

Inputs from This Week

1. The Consumer Confidence Index was 91.4 vs the 94.4 expected. The index was however up from last month’s 90.6.
2. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey projections for next six months are Bullish 31.4% vs the prior week’s 42.3%, Bearish 42.3% vs the prior week’s 36.3%.
3. Workforce participation of 61.4% is the lowest since the covid readings. (We have made working on payroll unattractive for some.)
4. In some European countries the number of air conditioners is small, and some are even being removed. (The founder of modern Singapore stated that the installation of “AC” led to the economic growth, enabling it to become the fifth richest economy in the world.)

 

Future Investment Problems

1. Americans misreading foreign data. The foreign performance of indices and positions is converted into US dollars from the local currency. As the US dollar is currently stronger than most other currencies, it makes foreign investments look more attractive. We tend to forget that most US investors temporarily rent foreign securities. When we sell in declining markets local buyers are often the only buyers and they are not generous.
2. When looking at the statics of a company, investors look at where the fiscal headquarters of the company is located, not where the product or service is sold. Consequently, many investors currently think they are investing in the UK, Taiwan, or South Korea. The Financial Times 100 largest companies, which dominate the local British stock market, makes almost none of its operating earnings are earned in the UK. It is my guess that a good many US investors think their rapidly expanding earnings are coming from South Korea and Taiwan, not by what is happening in the US.
3. Investors are often attracted to various securities indices due to a handful of the leading performing issues within the index. These companies, at least for a while, perform better than the indices. However, history tells us that it is only a matter of time before the leaders become laggards and detract from the performance of the index.
4. One recent concern of mine is that a senior American General in Europe is resigning. He is a four-star general with a very good battle record. I don’t believe it is an appropriate time to reduce our military leadership anywhere, particularly in Europe.
5. As a portfolio manager for long-term beneficiaries, I am very conscious of the variability of performance records. Looking at the recent five-year period, only six mutual fund sectors had average performance better than the S&P 500 Index Funds average. For the ten-year period, only Large-Cap Growth Funds and Domestic and Global Science and Technology Funds beat the S&P 500 Index Funds average. Considering the CEOs of many companies don’t last beyond five years, with even fewer lasting ten years, I am particularly nervous about those whose stock prices depend on “AI” products and services. (I wonder how many repeat orders there are for their present products and services.) Many of last year’s leaders are selling below last year’s performance ranks.

 

Possible Buys

The one major stock group selling below its 2000 price is Healthcare. I do not know these stocks well and tend to use specialty funds to invest in the sector. I will probably reach sell decisions without much help from the industry, but that may be a long time from now. Without a lot of knowledge, I am starting my learning efforts with Johnson & Johnson and CVS Health. I like their strategies but don’t know their tactics, managements, and their outlooks for their critical present and future drugs. Furthermore, I don’t know the outlook for government regulation. I need any help subscribers can provide.  

                                         

US Gifts to Others

Those in the US are incredibly lucky, or if you prefer God Given, considering the benefits/gifts we have received. However, it is wise to note that some of what we have given to the rest of the world is not always beneficial, as shown below:

1. A constitution that enshrines the rights of minorities.
2. An education process that attracts students from all over the world, who return to their homelands and contribute to them.
3. A military power that has critically helped defend other countries.
4. Innovation, which has produced great things for the world. 

 

Hope you had a good July 4th and life gets better.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What is Pending and When - Weekly Blog # 947

Mike Lipper's Blog: Too Many Short-Term Worries To Pick Long-Term Winners - Weekly Blog # 946

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This the Last Hurrah? - Weekly Blog # 945

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

New Era? - Weekly Blog # 944

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

New Era?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

Evidence

After an extended period of daily market movements below 1% per day, the most meaningful stock market index fell -2.64%, with the technology sector falling much more. The 30-company Philadelphia Semiconductor Index which produces the critical needs for “AIs” explosive growth fell -10.3%, while the NASDAQ Composite fell -4.18%. (This is not the first decline for a new technology driven bull market, which was led by railroads, canals, and undersea cables in 1873. These stocks traded on exchanges in America, London, and Vienna. In Vienna the market dropped 45% in one day.) Despite the happy talk from Washington and various pundits, we have seen continued notices of layoffs from large, seasoned companies, including by Macy and Saks. In New Jersey, April unemployment was 4.8% vs 4.3% nationally. (It was just announced that Exxon and Chevron have changed their state of incorporation from New Jersey to Texas.) What is more significant to me is the number of bank branches that are closing. Perhaps more significant is the observable factor that attractive, wealthy women, are not wearing expensive jewelry while shopping or at performances.

 

Midweek, the AAII sample survey showed the market outlook for the next six months being 36% bullish and 37% bearish. (I suspect that if the survey was done after Friday’s market, we would have seen a bigger total for the bears). Interestingly, some stocks that typically don’t attract tech buyers, like Coca Cola* (+3.46%), Moody’s* (0.49%), and even Apple*, fell less than the market (-1.25%).

*Owned in managed or personal accounts.

 

My View 

Most analysts and pundits compare stock price performance to past cycles to determine investment policies, much like telling time with a stopped clock. Seldom in an investment career does it pay to look for meaningful structural change. One way to do this is to recognize that old firmly held beliefs, like a flat earth, keep us from falling into the abyss. Like Columbus, we should seek to find new riches by going against the popular view, putting faith in a compass over an orderly world view. Similar to Columbus I may be wrong, but I will hopefully reward my backers with fabulous wealth by addressing society’s real problem, far too many unproductive people. Not only are the young unproductive, but there are also healthy seniors not working for money or the good of society.

 

Today’s government employment data shows that there are sufficient job openings for all the unemployed, although the hirers say they can’t find enough people to meet their needs. Only 61% of our population are employed. I translate that to mean they can’t find people with the correct attitudes and education to meet their needs. This is an indictment of both our schools and homelife. To solve this problem, they should automate wherever possible, which can mean using “AI”. 

 

 For many years I boarded a 6 AM train with papers to read, reaching the office at about 7 AM prepared for my first meeting with colleagues or committee members of the New York Society of Securities Analysts, the trade association of my profession. I was not alone, I would meet other analysts outside their offices for a bite of breakfast, where executive committee members were also having breakfast with their direct reports or others that were on the way up. (This was not the normal day that the executive committee officially met, but they were still doing business.) After a full day working numbers and writing reports, I caught the 6 PM train home. I arrived at close to 7 PM and then spent time with my children going over how they spent their day. Thus, my workday was 12 hours, with some additional time spent on the weekend. I probably spent some 70 hours a week fighting my way up the ladder.

 

The law calls for a 40-hour week, which does not include lunch. Today, according to the Department of Labor, the average American works a little more than 34 hours a week and that time probably includes lunch. If you listen to the young people of today, they believe in a work/life balance of at least 50/50. No wonder our productivity grows at around 3%, which appears to be higher than in China.

 

“Evidently, when Trump visited Xi Jinping last month, the Chinese president made a pointed reference to the concept of overstretch. A concept that was put forward over two millennia ago by the ancient historian and general, Thucydides. Can China and the US overcome this trap? There is also the risk of war expenditures becoming greater than the rest of the economy. The current administration, unlike China, is extremely focused on short-term-announcements impacting the mid-terms. Strategically however, both the President and Xi Jinping are aware of the seminal work by Rear Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahon, titled The Influence of Sea Power Upon History.

 

See what you can do to increase productivity and put more of us to work for society. Your help is needed.

                                         

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Warnings Increasing - Weekly Blog # 943

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rhymes + Future Opportunities - Weekly Blog # 942

Mike Lipper's Blog: Many Trends Within the Same Market - Weekly Blog # 941

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Many Trends Within the Same Market - Weekly Blog # 941

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Many Trends Within the Same Market

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Preface

The purpose of this preface is to share my long-term thinking, which in part drives my current investment thinking. There is no better portfolio manager thinker I have known than Peter Lynch, who produced a stellar performance record with a large equity mutual fund over the 1977-1990 period. One of his beliefs was “Know what you own, and why you own it.”

 

One approach to investing is to be index aware or agnostic. My approach is different in that it recognizes that all security prices are cyclically dependent due to both the expressed attitude of the individual stocks for security and to the market in general. My focus is on the client, recognizing that they often have several perceived competing needs.

 

For multi-generational accounts, long-term performance volatility is as important, if not more so, than simple performance, because it can shake people’s confidence. Volatility multiples focused on by pundits in the press can scare investors into dumping well thought out positions.

 

In many cases, accounts that are managed serially by members of the family have good results, often due to patience and having seen volatility in the past. There are a handful of globally managed accounts that have worked reasonably well, which have both low volatility and good long-term performance.

 

For future oriented accounts the selection process does not depend on the present roster of products. New products, or more germane new ways of filling critical needs can help companies become leaders in their fields. Apple (*) is one such company, although you should be aware that this approach can lead to failed products or approaches at times.

* Owned in client and personal accounts.

 

In today’s markets the primary way to avoid equity losses is to invest in fixed income securities, which often have higher yields than current short-term rates due to investing in lower quality or longer maturity bonds. This approach may lead to unexpected losses from higher interest rates, which might be discouraging and defeat the very purpose of temporarily getting out of the stock market, which is to have a buying reserve. I prefer short-term, under two-year maturities, or in a few cases middle yielding bonds with low price/earnings ratios. In the latter case, you should be willing to sell these bonds after a major market decline, even at a loss, to get cash to invest in stocks that are more growth oriented.

 

There is risk in the growing amount of debt being undertaken by governments, companies, and families, because of depleted accident/emergency reserves. This could lead to a situation we have not seen in 95 years. A significant change in the structure of the global economy that could take an extended period to recover from. Moving further in this direction should cause us to enter a period of reflection, recovery, and renewal. We need to be aware of the possibility that this structural change might happen.

 

Now a View of the Current Situation

If you look at what is being reported in the current media, you might think “the market” has a bullish future. The truth is, during the latest week on the “Big Board” only 745 stocks, or 26% rose. Even on the on the more speculative and shorter-lived NASDAQ Composite, just 31% of the stocks were sold at higher prices.

 

For those who have been trained to look at bond yields as a predictor of future stock prices, the average yield of ten high quality bonds picked by Barron’s rose 15 basis points for the week, while a group of medium quality bonds only rose 5 basis points. Rising bond yields mean lower bond prices, which is negative for stock prices.

 

Two companies I follow are Berkshire Hathaway (*) and McKinsey. Berkshire reduced the number of stocks in its portfolio while simultaneously buying its shares at 144% of book value. McKinsey, a privately owned company, preserved cash by cutting cash dividends and increasing equity distributions to its partners.

* Owned by managed accounts and personal accounts.

 

I pay particular attention to the performance of mutual funds. On a year-to-date basis through Thursday, 38 of 103 fund sector averages beat the S&P 500 Index Fund average. It has been very difficult to beat the performance of the S&P 500 Index for the past 10 years. Only 3 sector averages have accomplished that, and they were all driven by investor enthusiasm for “AI”.

 

The same thing happened among the leaders overseas, where a 1/3 of the emerging securities had some activity in “AI”.  This was particularly true in Taiwan and South Korea. AI labels, where the company is headquartered, should be viewed with caution, as we don’t know what percent of the chips and computers eventually land in the US.

 

One final statistic that I follow is the index of industrial prices put out by ECRI. For the week the index finished at 145.33, up from 142.00 the prior week and 32.58 12 months earlier. Obviously, problems in the Strait of Hormuz and other supply chain issues played a role in the increase.

 

Final impression

 All investments appear to have increased risks. So please be careful.

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What Can Go Wrong - Weekly Blog # 940

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Weekend’s Learning Sources - Weekly Blog # 939

Mike Lipper's Blog: Watch Out for the Four - Weekly Blog # 938

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Watch Out for the Four - Weekly Blog # 938

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Watch Out for the Four

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Preface

As subscribers have been told, I am shifting my focus to investing for long-term gains, hopefully for multiple generations. This is the time to begin searching for future winners, although it’s not the time to begin serious buying. If you are like me, at times it can be difficult to only follow an investment intellectually. I need to own a small amount so that I go through all the relevant info while awaiting the time to begin a meaningful buy program.

 

Timing May Not Begin Until:

The beginning of the buy program will not start until people and the data change. In terms of people, there are four structural leaders. These are the men who wish to change the future and are governing to do that. They lead and largely dictate activities in the US, China, Russia, and North Korea. Only the last one, North Korea, is preparing to eventually pass the torch of control to a very young daughter. In each case the eventual leader will be different than the present leader and will have to exert power to stay in place. Any of these replacements could have input into future global investments. Because of the similar ages of the first three, investors will be faced with cross currents that will make choosing investment policy difficult.

 

Before these leadership transitions occur, the global economy is likely to change multiple times. I expect we will be dealing with the terrible “4s”* at least some of the time. The data series likely to experience major swings are inflation, currencies, and taxes, among others. Changes to these data series may not be dictated from on high, but in the marketplace. Additionally, secular changes in demographics and technology will have an impact on how people act and feel.

*Terrible 4s are 4% for inflation, unemployment, and dollar decline, leading to an S&P 500 price that starts with a “4”. A high 4 signals a recession and a low 4 a depression.

 

What Can We Do Now?

First, we can pay attention to what people are doing, not saying. Actions speak louder than words. While the media is full of pundits talking about market indices at new highs, 58% of the stocks on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) fell in the latest week. Perhaps more meaningful, 56% of the stocks fell on the NASDAQ. A survey of investment advisers and their clients found advisers twice as bullish as their customers.

 

Second, be aware of financial and economic history. We know that historic patterns don’t exactly repeat, but directionally they are pretty accurate. Economic cycles are based in part on the level of debt being created throughout the system. (Government deficits need to be considered as well as business debt, personal debt, and accidental debt.)

 

When debt repayment becomes too burdensome it won’t be promptly repaid and will cause purchasing power to drop and fixed income/equity markets to decline. Depending on the severity of the decline it will be called a recession or a depression. The frequency of recessions is normally five to ten years, suggesting one is due. A depression is much more serious and infrequent, usually every fifty to one hundred years. Depressions are often caused by mismanagement of an economy in a recession. We have not had a depression for ninety years and some believe the last one brought on WWII. The key for us is knowing that these occurrences are possible and being aware and ready to change behavior.

 

While Waiting

The present should be devoted to looking for stocks to buy for the next expansion. A study of the past suggests the leaders of the next cycle will be quite different than the present. Bearing in mind that many children born today will need retirement money 100 years from now, the odds of most large companies surviving is not good.

 

There are lots of ways to choose stocks to research. None of them are perfect and they will change over time, so investors should always be learning what will cause change. From time to time, I’ll pick one approach to explore briefly, so keep tuned to find an approach that helps you.

 

Acquisitions

No solution is perfect, and conditions change unpredictably. It is normal to change our choices after looking at the cards we are given. The easiest approach is to add a new holding and temporarily retire a present holding. Additionally, no one plays the investment game without making periodic acquisitions. Unfortunately, many investors fail to discard some part of what is not working. This habit of adding without discarding leads to an ever-increasing number of acquisitions, which in most cases leads to average and eventually below average results.

 

I have never seen an acquirer who couldn’t benefit from getting more talent, often with different characteristics than their existing talent. I have often found it better to buy a company for management and tax purposes, even if it’s for a single individual. It has worked for me, even when it was a bad choice. It is easier for me to make a bad choice than to fire an individual or a small group who I like as people, but not as workers and co-venturers. I am comfortable with the way Apple often buys tiny companies, compared to others who acquire much larger companies with all sorts of personnel problems.

 

I was speaking with the manager of a small unit in a very large company who wanted the unit to grow by hiring more people doing the same thing his present employees do. That may be efficient in terms of output, but it just adds to existing problems. I would not view this situation as growth but view it as adding new machines. If on the other hand the new people brought new talents, they could serve a different group of clients who had different needs, which is real growth.

 

There are some companies who try to grow by buying distant operations, adding resources outside their prime geographical area. I do not view this as growth of talent either, but as getting more copies of existing machines. They would be adding to present capacity but not getting new talents that could open new markets. For me they are not growth engines but merely machine acquirers, which will not be valuable talents as the business changes. Investors can see which type of stock I would acquire, even at somewhat of a premium price.

 

Question: What do you think about my approach?  

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors’ Interlude - Weekly Blog # 937

Mike Lipper's Blog: Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution - Weekly Blog # 936

Mike Lipper's Blog: We Have a Management Problem - Weekly Blog # 935

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution - Weekly Blog # 936

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Not Yet Ready for a long-term Solution

  

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Preface

I was hoping to start a series of blogs on the selection of smart securities investment strategies for multi-generational ownership. Unfortunately, the current data does not lead to a positive view. The breakdown of the twenty-hour cease fire negotiation with the Iranians confirms that this was a week of data confusion. The historical odds were against progress in the search for political and economic solutions.

 

Our Side

The investment mode for the week is captured by the changes in the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey of the next six month’s market outlook. The bullish outlook improved slightly to 35.7% from 33.6% the prior week, a gain of 2.1% in a not highly disciplined survey. What is perhaps a little more insightful is a drop in the bearish measure to 43.0% from 51.4%, a decline of 8.4 %. During the survey week, many pundits were enthused about the forthcoming ceasefire meeting. (I expect Sunday morning’s announcement of a failure to get an agreement will materially impact this coming week’s results.)

 

The two largest stock market exchanges reflected different views, with only 31% of NYSE stocks falling vs 53% of NASDAQ stocks declining. (The NASDAQ market has younger, more speculative companies, with a larger number of companies reporting losses, including some private debt funds.)

 

Consumer sentiment was reported to be lowest in 70 years. Moody’s (*) raised the chance of a recession in the next 12 months to 48.6%. One of their executives is quoted as saying “we could already be in a recession”. 

(*) Owned in managed accounts.

 

Iranians’ View

The first thing to remember is that Iran is the modern name for Persia, which was the dominant political/military power in the Middle East for hundreds of years. Persia was briefly lost to Alexander the Great and later to the Ottomans but was never effectively occupied by foreign forces.

 

The current view of the Iranians is that Trump is losing this war. He is driven to achieve a quick victory to guarantee a positive mid-term election this year, at least in the House. The Iranians are believers in the German strategist Carl von Clausewitz’s statement that “war is an instrument of policy by other means”. Our President went to a military high school, but I believe he at best learned infantry tactics, not strategy. He did not participate in the ROTC at University of Pennsylvania. The current Secretary of War did not have any professional exposure at West Point or VMI and thus was not schooled in strategy. One of Clausewitz’s beliefs was getting the other side to give up the will to fight. Unfortunately, since WWII the US has won wars but lost the peace in getting their opponent to give up the willingness to fight. The last time we achieved it was through the Marshal Plan, named after General George Marshal a graduate of VMI who rebuilt the industrial strength of Germany.

 

While the potential for nuclear warfare was a concern, the far greater risk to the US, Britain, Europe, Mid East, Africa, Latin America, and Asia were already active sleeper cells. At this point we have not yet organized an effective counterforce.

 

It is no wonder the weekend discussions did not produce positive results. Consequently, it may be too early to invest new long-term money.

 

These are controversial views. Please exchange your thoughts. I am always a student and need to learn.

                                        

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: We Have a Management Problem - Weekly Blog # 935

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is History Rhyming Again? - Weekly Blog # 934

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

1 week = 1 month, or 1 or more years

From this investor’s viewpoint, the previous five trading days could be seen as a great dichotomy. Seventy seven percent of NYSE stock prices declined and 66% of NASDAQ stocks. Additionally, the US dollar rose in price to 100.362 on Friday from 97.70 on Thursday!!

 

The stock price decline was supported by a sharply increased bearish reading in the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey looking 6-months ahead, which rose to 46.4% from 35.5% the prior week. There was only a slight fall in the bullish six-month prediction which fell to 31.9% from 33.1% the prior week. Large publicly traded companies continued to report little to no hiring to offset those retiring.

 

One might have thought that worries about inflation would have had more impact, with the ECRI industrial price indicator rising to 130.99% from 126% the prior week. The index was up 9.59% for the last 12 months, but that didn’t seem to retard the jump in the dollar on Friday.

 

If one listened to the advocates of The President, the move in Friday’s dollar pointed to good times ahead. Other factors they mentioned were part of the reason the majority sold stocks this week, including on the last day of the week. We therefore have a dichotomy, which is a condition that can’t last or perhaps requires a different analysis?

 

The correct analysis is a condition that possibly occurs to seniors. That is the need to get corrective eyewear (glasses or implants). Perhaps we need to use one set of lenses for short distances and one for long or perhaps use bifocals.

 

We could be drawing close to the time when we will know whether the short-term optimistic view or the longer-term more pessimistic view followed by optimism is correct.

 

Watch the S&P 500

There are four major US stock market indices quoted in the press. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) consists of just 30 stocks weighted by their stock prices, whereast he Standard & Poor’s 500 is weighted by market capitalization. The NASDAQ Composite is also capitalization weighted of about 500 stocks, although some stocks don’t have public records for five and ten years. The Russell 2000 Index is small-cap focused and suffers from a significant number of companies reporting losses. For analytical and investment purposes, most large financial institutions use the S&P 500 Index.

 

The S&P 500 Index closed at 6,632 on Friday, the lowest price in over four months. Market analysts believe a further decline of more than 3% will make a near-term market rise above its former high of 7,002 difficult for an extended period. The reason for this is, many of the investors who bought stocks before the decline will try to breakeven on the way up, making progress slow. 

 

Question: What do you think?

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

  

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Basic Investment Principle

Investment opportunities are cyclical in both timing and magnitude. Larger gains are achieved after periods of extended declines. Since one does not know the extent of a decline or magnitude, it is wise to use a buying program. For instance, invest no more than 10% of buying reserves at any time. (This assumes you establish a buying reserve in rising markets. Charlie Munger has taught us to buy good companies at fair prices rather than always look for “cheap” prices.

 

Recently, my sister-in-law sent me a copy of a letter from my grandfather to my late brother sometime after he left the Marine Corps to begin his life in the investment business in the mid-1950s. My grandfather, who built his own brokerage firm for more than thirty years, cautioned my brother to always expect periodic recessions and less frequent depressions. He also advised him to not invest against the US, as the country was rich in natural resources. (This is still good advice, but there are times when our government makes our currency risky for a period.)

 

Where are We?

Most investors in defining where we are, do so by looking at where we have come from. The pundits wax poetic about recent data extrapolations, expecting the past to be repeated. My analytical training at the New York racetracks and as a US Marines Corp Officer was to always examine the current situation and expect some change.

 

Today, many pundits and politicians see an improving picture. As a student of financial history, I am conscious that it has been some time since the last recession. Furthermore, it has been 97 years since the Wall Street crash and the 12-year depression. Few people recognize any similarity between that time and our current condition.

 

Trading Alerts-Correction, Recession, or Depression?

The following are a number of alerts from last week suggesting we are entering a period of more declines than increases:

1. Morgan Stanley is planning to cut 3% of its customer-facing workers.
2. 73% of stocks traded down on the NYSE and 67% on the NASDAQ. A pattern which has been going on for several weeks.
3. The ECRI industrial price index rose to 126%, a 4.73% gain year over year. Clearly, the war in the mid-east is inflationary. 85% of prices tracked by the Wall Street Journal each weekend declined, echoing the ECRI results
4. Individual investors and those serving retail investors are not confident in their outlook for the next 6 months. 33.1% are bullish and 35.5% bearish.
5. The S&P 500 index is the best indicator of the market for both institutional investors and wealthy investors. Along with most other indices, the S&P 500 index fell on Friday. If this was the beginning of a recession and the index were to decline to where its rise began, it would drop 28%. If this was the beginning of a relatively mild depression, the drop could be 49%.

 

Advice to Buy Program Buyers

I have found it extremely difficult to buy at the exact bottom, as most declines don’t appear convincing enough. The advantage of using a buy program strategy instead of a one-shot purchase is that you will likely have a collection of winners and losers before the overall market has reached back to its original starting point, assuming you buy 10% each month or quarter. However, that is not the point of the exercise. You should want to hold your position until it has reached the condition of a great company at too high a price, where some trimming makes sense.

 

Please share your thoughts with us.   

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission

Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Expectations Changing?

  

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

The Main Motivator They Don’t Teach

Fear is the main motivator they don’t teach you about in pre-kindergarten through Ph. D studies. Primarily, this list is comprised of what can go wrong and what will hurt you, such as going broke, losing a job, or being defrauded. Discussions are informative but not particularly action oriented. What would be useful is a list of expectations, and of prime importance how to recognize them and what to do. These are life lessons which we all need but are not taught.

 

Each of us has our own level of awareness of critical expectations and we are aware of the changes in them. While all aspects of human life are open to change, I am going to focus on the expectations which impact our investment realities. These expectations are easier because they deal in large part with numbers. Numbers, like prices or earnings per share, are precise but mean different things to different people at different times.

 

The difficult part of dealing with expectations is identifying when they change and by how much. For example, a stock price expectation between $103 and $98, or an earnings per share expectation between $0.67 and $0.70. The critical issue is how early, or late investor expectations begin to evolve compared to others. Being early or late is often more impactful than being right or wrong?

 

Are We Changing Expectations?

A recent January survey of institutional investors had 50% expecting stock prices to rise, 39% expecting prices to be stable and 10% expecting prices to fall. An American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) six-month sample survey of investor expectations found 33.2% bullish and 32.9% bearish. Three weeks ago, both groups were about equally sure at 38%.

 

For the week ended Friday, more stocks fell on the NYSE and NASDAQ than rose (NYSE 56% and NASDAQ 53%, respectively). Normally slow-moving industrial commodity prices rose to123.06% from 121.92% the week before.

 

Most important of all, the US and Israel bombed Iran on Friday night. (The timing of the attack was a surprise to most, although the US has been building up its military and Naval forces in the Middle East recently.)

 

For some time, large companies in the US have not replaced retiring workers with new hires. We will see in the coming week if there is a large change in market expectations and whether that change in expectations is long-lasting.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

Mike Lipper's Blog: Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Is This The Week That Ends Instability?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 Preface

I believe it was Lenin who said there are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen. Possibly, the four-day trading week beginning this coming Tuesday is such a period. In both the Financial Times and her podcast, Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab* introduced the concept of the period we are going through as an extended period of instability. I am suggesting it is possible the beginning of the end of this period may have begun.

*Shares held in in managed and personal accounts.

 

Fund Data Sets the Table

Whether one invests in mutual funds or not, one should recognize that not only do many people invest in them, but more importantly, many fund managers get their training at fund shops. Thus, one can get an understanding of the institutional mind set by looking at fund data. In the five years ended last Thursday, the London Stock Exchange Group published my old firm’s weekly study of 105 equity related mutual fund peer-groups average performances.

 

The average performance of S&P 500 Index funds was 14.05% compounded for the past five years.  There were only five peer group averages that were better: Precious Metals Equity Funds +21.50%, Energy MLP Funds +20.79%, Commodities Precious Metals Funds +18.75%, Natural Resources Funds +17.30%, and Global Natural Resources Funds +16.05%.  There were just two better performing thematic categories, precious metals and energy. The narrowness of performance leadership proves how difficult it was to pick winners for the past five years. The leadership crown was indeed unstable.

 

Another way to identify the instability in economic data is to examine the tails of the best and worst 2 items shown in Saturday’s WSJ weekly price chart. The best was Silver +11.67% and the second best was the KOPSI +5.55%. The second worst price performance was Financials -2.33%, which was half as bad as Corn -4.71%, the worst performer. The gaps between the top two leaders and laggards suggest concentration is at play.

 

Turning Points Possible Next Week

On Tuesday, probably in the late afternoon, SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the US) is expected to announce its decision on the IEEPA tariff. The President has said he is prepared for an unfavorable ruling and has substitute measures in mind. At best this will be disruptive, and possibly inflationary. The ECRI industrial price index, which is normally slow moving, rose to 120.49% from the prior week’s level of 117.42%.

 

Markets are anticipating problems, either from Tariffs or possibly Iran. Sixty-two percent of the stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rose last week, while only fifty-three percent rose on the NASDAQ. The NASDAQ trades more tech stocks and the shares of younger companies. Thus, the junior exchange is likely to react more than the “Big Board” to news events. Retail investors, when not gambling, are more active on the junior market. One possible measure of this is the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey, which reported 49.5% bullish for the next six months, up from 42.5% the prior week. What may be more significant is the 28.2% that were bearish. Many professional traders believe “the public” is wrong at turning points.

 

The Davos meeting begins Tuesday, with many political and economic leaders present and chatting. One doesn’t know what will be discussed and how meaningful the meetings will be.

 

Keep us Informed as to any Changes in Your Views.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

 

 

Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Investment Time Horizon Should Pick

How You Measure the Results

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

Current Situation

Billions of people invest directly or indirectly in US securities markets, with each having somewhat different motivations and thoughts about what they are doing. Since we don’t know these people and the way they think, we simply group them into buckets. I have found the intended investment period often defines how they invest and for what period.

 

My outlook is of someone who has served families and institutions, and I tend to think long-term for them. As most money invested in mutual funds is largely for retirement and most institutions are designed to pay out their assets over an extended period of many years, they too have a long-term time horizon. (Unfortunately, this focus on the long term does not come with a knowledge of what the future will bring in terms of risks and rewards.)

 

The media concentrates on “news” and fills space with the current chatter about the present and the next expected announcement of note. Most security salespeople and money managers believe potential investors are primarily interested in the present and that is the focus of their sales pitches.

 

These two different focuses have led to two very different market structures. The hyper action-oriented players dwell on any market development that leads to a move in stock prices. They celebrate the percentage gains of interim results and prognostications. Those who use securities to meet future payments are concerned about anything that might reduce these payments in terms of future purchasing power. A possible tell-tale signal of a threat is the sale of securities by supposedly knowledgeable investors.

 

This is the tug of war between those seeking near-terms rewards and those worrying about the loss of worth of some future payment. To satisfy both camps the stock exchanges publish the volume of shares sold at higher and lower prices and the number of issues which rose and fell each trading day.

 

In the latest week there were only four trading days and one of those was half a day. On the last day the volume of shares traded on the NYSE was down by approximately 2/3rds and by approximately one half on the NASDAQ*. (In the current market environment, I pay more attention to the NASDAQ, as it has risen the most this year due to having more “Tech” companies, whose stock prices are more volatile than those on “The Big Board”. On Monday the 4 indicators were larger for the NASDAQ and on Tuesday the NYSE saw better results. This see-saw pattern has occurred frequently throughout the year.) For the week, 65 % of NASDAQ stocks rose in price vs 61% for the NYSE.

*Client and personal accounts own shares in NASDAQ.

 

In terms of looking at the future there were two interesting notices. The Conference Board Consumer Sentiment Survey was 89.1% vs 92.9% the prior month. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) saw a drop in bullish sentiment for the next six months in their sample survey, dropping to 37.4% from 44.1% the prior week.

 

Understanding the Measure

Most of the chatter about this change focused on the percentage change from the period immediately prior. However, there is another way to look at the results, the way an actuary would in determining the chance of a certain event happening. This is done by reviewing the entire history of the statistical sample, including any possible period where that event could reappear and at what frequency. For example, one chance out of fifty years, or every 84 months, or something similar. History traced through geological discoveries has recorded cycles of expansions and contractions with some regularity. It is much easier with regular barter or the development of money.

 

Said simply, when there is a shortage of supply over the level of demand, prices go up. When there is more supply than demand, prices drop. Climate also impacts agriculture, as does the effort of humans. The supply of money was a recent concern, which has more recently shifted to concerns about the supply of credit and certain natural resources. In all cases, it is the imbalance of critical items which moves prices to a point of excess, which causes a reversal.

 

Small reversals happen more frequently than large ones, often occurring within a single presidential term. However, small reversals periodically stretch over two or conceivably three terms. In trying to avoid or stop small declines, the application of well-meaning changes can trigger bigger declines, which we label depressions.

 

Addressing the economic hardships caused by the cost of fighting WWI led to an extended period of debt expansion, which initially hurt the farming communities. This led to the application of tariffs to protect small banks which extended loans to over expanded farmers and farm equipment dealers in critically important mid-western senate seats. Simultaneously, the public became enamored with the use of credit in an already highly priced stock market.

 

The market crash of 1929 caused many people to lose money in margin accounts, along with many of their brokers. The market reached a bottom in 1931, but people were scared by what had happened. In 1932 they elected FDR as President as a protector of the banks, and he closed all the banks in 1933 in an attempt to restructure society. Even though FDR lost most of his battles with the Constitution and the Courts, he initiated various government agencies that mismanaged the economy until we entered WWII, which he helped start in both the Pacific and Atlantic. The US recovered slowly after the war and subsequent Korean Conflict, although some stocks listed on the NYSE did not reach their 1929 highs until the mid-1960s with the discounted dollar.

 

Semi Parallels Today

There has been an expansion of debt both at the federal and individual level, with bankruptcies currently rising. At the same time, prudent constraints on the financial community have been reduced or eliminated. Additionally, we have an underequipped military, including Navy, Air, Space, and Coast Guard not ready for a multi-front war.

 

Conclusion:

We don’t know when the next decline will happen, or if the depth of the decline will morph into a depression. However, we should resist being fully exposed to rising gains in the non-public market while we experience a stagnant private economy. It is possible gains achieved in 2026 may be expensive in the long run, so be careful.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

Mike Lipper's Blog: On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.