Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 933

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Bifocal Analysis: Short & Long-Term

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Short-Term

The data is so negative that brief and violent rallies are to be expected. Net stock selling has consistently outpaced buying for each of the last four weeks. For example, 85% of the NYSE stocks and 81% of NASDAQ stocks fell in the latest week. As Barron’s noted “cash is looking more appealing since stock market hedges, bonds, and gold are no longer working.” Employers are barely replacing the more expensive retiring labor in most manufacturing functions.

 

There is a new player in the game, private credit. For the most part issuers of private credit instruments don’t qualify for bank loans, and they don’t have long credit histories either. Much of this paper is held in new funds, which are being sold to retail channels. When one of these loans gets in trouble it is referred to as a “cockroach”. Jaime Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase (*) warned that where there is one “cockroach” there is likely to be more.

(*) JPM shares are owned in managed accounts.

 

Market analysts are concerned that the S&P 500 Index has been locked in a narrow 300-point band for the last four months, with optimists and pessimist exchanging positions. This week, the lower boundary line was briefly pierced. If the “500” drops 3% more, then the 400-point range will become a difficult region for the market to rise beyond for quite a period. This fear may briefly spark some rallies from the derivative and short players.

 

Longer-Term Implications of History

One purpose of recorded history is to explain what happened, at least in the eyes of the winning survivors. The survivors, or their intellectual heirs, construct rules as to why certain actions are repeated. If there are enough repetitions the rules become dictum, even though the battle conditions are different. We are taught from a very early age to follow rules without an understanding of the conditions that created them. This blind acceptance of rules has led to occasional great mistakes in politics, the military, sports, families, business, and of course investing. Historic labels often become shorthand for rules. For instance: Adam and Eve, George Washington, the NY Yankees, Democrats, Republicans, Chopin, etc.

 

As has been noted before, I learned basic analysis at the NY racetracks. One great lesson from racing lore was Man of War, which had 25 winning races in a row but lost his last race to an unknown horse named Upstart. Proving unexpected things can and occasionally do happen. My self-appointed task at the track was to guess the chance of the unexpected happening.

 

Applying the racetrack experience to investing I looked at the historical record of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger for stocks and companies in which to invest. In an oversimplification there were at least three characteristics the winners had in common, the nature of customers, the characteristics of the workforce, and the discipline of integrity. (I suspect the last was penned by his long-term counsel and director Ron Olson, a fellow ex-trustee of Caltech.)

 

If the US stock market does decline materially in the period ahead, I will try to apply the track lessons learned. Charlie Munger taught Warren Buffett it was better to buy a good company at a reasonable price and not wait for a cheap price. For many years there were great companies we didn’t own because they were selling way above a reasonable price. I expect a number of these “beauties” will be available at reasonable prices during the next depression.

 

Next Depression

I don’t know when it will happen but based on human nature, I expect it to happen. The US has had only four Presidents that were restructurers: Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, and Trump. Below are some parallels to the 1930-1942 depression:

• Each challenged the constitution and fought with the courts
• Weakened the controls on the banks
• Set the stage for war
• Weakened the currency
• Encouraged the retail public to invest in speculative vehicles
• Changed how the US was governed
• All Presidents, except Andrew Jackson, were involved with Japan

No historical comparison is identical, and the future may be different than the past, but odds favor a closer similarity.

 

Please share your views, there is much to learn.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: This week’s Dichotomy/Bifocals Needed - Weekly Blog # 932

Mike Lipper's Blog: Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon? - Weekly Blog # 931

  

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Premature: Buying Program to Begin Soon?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Basic Investment Principle

Investment opportunities are cyclical in both timing and magnitude. Larger gains are achieved after periods of extended declines. Since one does not know the extent of a decline or magnitude, it is wise to use a buying program. For instance, invest no more than 10% of buying reserves at any time. (This assumes you establish a buying reserve in rising markets. Charlie Munger has taught us to buy good companies at fair prices rather than always look for “cheap” prices.

 

Recently, my sister-in-law sent me a copy of a letter from my grandfather to my late brother sometime after he left the Marine Corps to begin his life in the investment business in the mid-1950s. My grandfather, who built his own brokerage firm for more than thirty years, cautioned my brother to always expect periodic recessions and less frequent depressions. He also advised him to not invest against the US, as the country was rich in natural resources. (This is still good advice, but there are times when our government makes our currency risky for a period.)

 

Where are We?

Most investors in defining where we are, do so by looking at where we have come from. The pundits wax poetic about recent data extrapolations, expecting the past to be repeated. My analytical training at the New York racetracks and as a US Marines Corp Officer was to always examine the current situation and expect some change.

 

Today, many pundits and politicians see an improving picture. As a student of financial history, I am conscious that it has been some time since the last recession. Furthermore, it has been 97 years since the Wall Street crash and the 12-year depression. Few people recognize any similarity between that time and our current condition.

 

Trading Alerts-Correction, Recession, or Depression?

The following are a number of alerts from last week suggesting we are entering a period of more declines than increases:

1. Morgan Stanley is planning to cut 3% of its customer-facing workers.
2. 73% of stocks traded down on the NYSE and 67% on the NASDAQ. A pattern which has been going on for several weeks.
3. The ECRI industrial price index rose to 126%, a 4.73% gain year over year. Clearly, the war in the mid-east is inflationary. 85% of prices tracked by the Wall Street Journal each weekend declined, echoing the ECRI results
4. Individual investors and those serving retail investors are not confident in their outlook for the next 6 months. 33.1% are bullish and 35.5% bearish.
5. The S&P 500 index is the best indicator of the market for both institutional investors and wealthy investors. Along with most other indices, the S&P 500 index fell on Friday. If this was the beginning of a recession and the index were to decline to where its rise began, it would drop 28%. If this was the beginning of a relatively mild depression, the drop could be 49%.

 

Advice to Buy Program Buyers

I have found it extremely difficult to buy at the exact bottom, as most declines don’t appear convincing enough. The advantage of using a buy program strategy instead of a one-shot purchase is that you will likely have a collection of winners and losers before the overall market has reached back to its original starting point, assuming you buy 10% each month or quarter. However, that is not the point of the exercise. You should want to hold your position until it has reached the condition of a great company at too high a price, where some trimming makes sense.

 

Please share your thoughts with us.   

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations Changing? - Weekly Blog # 930

Mike Lipper's Blog: Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission

Diversification - Weekly Blog # 929

 

         

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Diversification

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                                                                        

 

Preface

On a recent trip to London, Ruth and I attended a private fund and friend raising concert for the Academy of St. Martin’s in the Fields (ASMF), where Ruth is the first American trustee. The wonderful music was performed by Joshua Bell, the artistic director, and five other top-notch string musicians from the ASMF. Between the six talented musicians they played three different types of string instruments, alternating between lead and ensemble roles. The result was a successful combination of each of their talents.

 

Even when listening to a magnificent concert performance, I cannot forget my investment responsibilities. As individual musicians alternated from leading to supporting roles, it reminded me of what individual securities should do in a diversified long-term investment portfolio.

 

Application to Portfolio Management

In 1940 the SEC completed their depression-oriented reform rules. Among the last of these was the Investment Company Act of 1940, which unlike the other six regulations was not formed at their SEC headquarters. It was produced at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington by lawyers for the fund industry from Boston, New York (where the industry’s trade association was headquartered), Philadelphia, and Washington. Considering their recent experience of the market falling during the Depression, the mood of the meeting was to try reduce the chance of big future declines. The best model for that were state laws governing trust accounts, using generations of work by Boston and Philadelphia lawyers. (Even as late as the early 1960s a few Boston law firms had professional securities analysts on staff to assist in managing trust accounts.) Note, the main concern of the creators of fund regulation was the avoidance of losses. No word was spoken of making money on investments.

 

They thought the best way to reduce the chance of major losses was to limit an account’s exposure to any single investment. This led to limiting the percentage amount that funds could invest in any one stock, which usually meant no more than 5% of the voting stock at cost (not market). To this very day, most equity funds are labeled as diversified if they adhere to this principal.

 

The Problem with Voting Stock Limits

The biggest penalty paid by investors is not losses, but the absence of profits. Mutual Funds with long histories often make ten, twenty, or even more times as much on some of their holdings, which more than covers a small number of losses. Furthermore, great fortunes have been made, particularly over successive generations, in single stock portfolios or portfolios having a small number of investments.

 

For Professional Investors

The concept of risk management is critical but doing it by name or percentage of voting shares does not reduce risk, it may increase if all investments are exposed to a single concept. In the late nineteenth century professional investors considered concentration to be the best and safest way to invest. My college degree is from Columbia University, which had an endowment fully invested in railroad bonds and stocks, every single one file for bankruptcy. Today there is a risk that some participants in the “AI” surge could produce similar results by investing in too much in a good thing.

 

For publicly traded securities I suggest the biggest risks is with the stock owner and not the issuer, as they will be sellers of the stock before you do. Other risks include countries, technology, politics, and management. These can be identified as short-term and long-term factors. A possible short-term indicator is slightly more participants being bearish than bullish in the latest American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey of expectations for the next six months. Interestingly, the long-term indicator was Friday’s announcement by the Supreme Court, which ruled against the President’s authority to set tariffs using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which had very little to any impact on the market.

 

Bottom line, watch the musicians play and how well they work together, both with other musicians and staff, but also watch the reaction of the audience.

 

Understanding Going Global

In a recent conversation with a London-based fund manager, who in the past was almost completely invested in the US but now has a growing position in European stocks. While he has the biggest portion of his portfolio in US securities, he is very risk aware and expresses this by augmenting his portfolio with European stocks. Normally, he expects his US positions to outperform his European positions, but not in a declining market. In terms of P/E, Free Cash Flow, Dividend Yield, and other value measures, European stocks are less risky than US holdings.

 

 Another careful investor was Charlie Munger, who listed six principles to be avoided: High Financial Leverage, High Operating Leverage, Negative Cashflow, Poor Governance, High Risk of Obsolescence, No Competitive Advantage vs. a Strong Competitor.

 

Share your thoughts

                

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: To Win Long-Term, Learn From Great Presidents - Weekly Blog # 928

Mike Lipper's Blog: Strategically, Time to Think Differently - Weekly Blog # 927

Mike Lipper's Blog: Do Current Prices Lead Future Markets? - Weekly Blog # 926

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity - Weekly Blog # 913

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

 

First Priority

An investment priority should be logging changes to your investment policies, although most investors do not maintain such records. To paraphrase the late and great Charlie Munger said that Warren Buffett was a learning machine. His point was, Warren benefited from the losses he sustained. He had an investment history of making very few repeated mistakes.

 

Most profitable investors also make relatively few mistakes, in part due to most mistakes forfeiting more opportunities than money. To avoid future mistakes, it would be helpful to have an insightful roster of mistakes. The real painful mistakes are repeaters.

 

Tools of Repeating Errors

Many repeating errors of judgement rely on an automatic mathematical response. For example, if “x” happens then do “y”. This is a non-thinking action. It does not adjust for changes in critical conditions that might impact the current situation.

 

On a very basic level, buying is different than selling. Investment buying is often based on market prices being wrong but are likely to change soon. The seller on the other hand believes in the relative attractiveness of a security that will shortly decline in price. In both cases the investor believes that he/she is ahead of the bulk of the investment market. These are the actions of someone who wants to be among the leaders.  This is in direct conflict with successful investors who prefer to be lonely and contrary to the crowd.

 

Understanding Complexity

Berkshire Hathaway (*) developed a system of categorizing new investment information into three buckets, “yes, no, too hard”. Berkshire’s advantage was structured on the combined experience of the late Mr. Munger and Mr. Buffett. This experience included knowledge of over 60 different companies they owned and the knowledge of various securities they previously owned or looked at for more than 100 years combined. Where most others saw complexity, they saw investment opportunity.

(* Berkshire Hathaway shares are owned in client and personal accounts.)

 

Can’t Avoid Complexity

In the modern global world, one cannot avoid complexity. However, with some hard work and experience you can reorder many elements into positives, negatives, and judgements to be determined. With this structure one can put odds on each critical item, leading to a preponderance of positives or negatives worthy of action.

 

An example of factors that surfaced this week in the media are shown below:

• Wall Street Journal Headline “Foreign Stocks outperform S&P…”. This could cause many US accounts to add foreign stocks and funds. However, the largest collection of stocks that Americans buy are multinational stocks listed overseas. In many cases the largest portion of these portfolios are invested in US operations, which is a negative if your purpose is to participate in European and Asian growth. (The same could be said about US listed multinationals with significant sales abroad. This includes Coca Cola, a large holding of Berkshire. The same could be said about Apple.)
• The Federal Reserve is concerned about a bifurcated economy consisting of technology and older companies. Both sides have significant foreign sales.
• This may be the wrong time for the proposed cut in bank supervision. Both banks and non-bank financials are increasing loans to lower-quality companies.
• While some believe oil is being priced attractively, natural gas prices are even more attractive. Also, Copper has historically performed better than gold.
• The “Buffett Premium” is disappearing just as insurance driven earnings are very strong.
• Cash in portfolios should be used in the short term, either as a basket to buy favored stocks or to reduce exposure to over-capitalized companies and increase return on equity.
• In latest week there were more declining stocks than rising stocks.

 

Each of the mentioned items could be attractive buy or sell opportunities, depending on one’s view.

 

What do you think?

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

Mike Lipper's Blog: Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Good Time to Sell? - Weekly Blog # 910

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Slow Moving in a Fog - Weekly Blog # 888

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Slow Moving in a Fog

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

Weather Predictor’s Real Function

One should pity the role of weather predictors who must often predict changes in the weather, either by hour, day, week, month, or year. One or more of their outputs are frequently wrong because something changes. As a professional chartered financial analyst (CFA) I am both grateful and sympathetic to their plight.

 

The only thing they can be confident of is making securities analysts look good, having a somewhat worse prediction record than the analysts. The primary reason they are wrong is that something changes. As both surviving analysts and politicians are prone to say, when the facts change, my views change.

 

To safeguard my self-confidence, I rely on a weather condition. A fog has descended on the economic and securities playing fields. We will be in such a situation this week and looking forward to the future. Since managing and owning a portfolio, “facts/sentiments” change every minute, hour, day, week, month, or year. It is more like navigating a vessel than a piece of statutory. Dangerous risks in a fog are unidentified shoals or obstacles, as well as warning elements which occur randomly.

 

Friendly Signals

• Many Chinese believe that 888 is a lucky sign of the future.
• The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) latest weekly sample survey showed a decline in bearish readings and an increase in bullish readings.
• 54% of the weekly readings of the prices of indices, currencies, commodities, and ETFs in the WSJ were higher.
• Unusual trading volume on Friday was the highest of the week.

Warning Signals

• The Financial Times noted that “Institutional Money Managers are trimming US exposure...”
• The US Federal Government is expected to cut-back “Watchdogs at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Securities and Exchange Commission.” (Beneath the surface, there appears to be concerns about the soundness of small banks and private debt instruments.)

 

Mixed Messages

When a stock price drops about 1% following a corporate announcement after it was expected to rise, either the expectation was wrong, or some didn’t understand the message. This is particularly true when the stock and announcer are both among the best practical educators in the investment world. I am referring to the drop in the price of Berkshire Hathaway* after Warren Buffett announced his intention to ask the Board to approve his resignation as CEO, effective year-end.

*Berkshire Hathaway is held in both client and personal accounts and is the largest holding in some of the later accounts.

 

Warren Buffett has said for years that the stock price would likely rise after he retired, and I shared his views for a couple of reasons. First, his retirement would eventually happen and second that he was running the company for the heirs of the shareholders. With that in mind, he ran the company in a low-risk fashion. In many, but not all ways, Berkshire was a trust account for the shareholders’ heirs.

 

His long-term friend and vice-chair, the late Charlie Munger, taught him not to buy cheap stocks on a price basis, but good companies at fair prices. Charlie called Warren a learning machine because he learned every day, particularly from losses. This reinforced the teaching of Professor David Dodd at Columbia, who taught the Securities Analysis course based on his experience in the Depression. This was perfectly appropriate for the times, and he was still focused that way in the mid-1950s when I took his course.

 

The course was essentially an accounting course using financial statements. It took me a number of years to learn the other key lesson, the business analysis of the issuer. This knowledge was one of Charlie Munger’s contributions to Warren. After Charlie passed a few days before his hundredth birthday, the likelihood of Warren’s own retirement became more likely.

 

His retirement became possible with the appointment of Greg Able, who is much more of an operating manager than a securities manager, which Berkshire neglected in my opinion. Recent sellers of the stock were likely worshipers of “Mr. Buffett” or possibly the heirs of long-term holders who now felt free to capture the assets for their own needs rather than wait for the passing of their relatives. They have probably never read anything about Berkshire’s investment thinking. Thus, I do not believe they are informed sellers.

 

How do you see things?

 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Significant Messages: Warren Buffett to Step Down by End of Year, Other Berkshire Insights, and Tariffs won't deliver - Weekly Blog # 887

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Contrarian Starting to Worry - Weekly Blog # 886

Mike Lipper's Blog: Generally Good Holy Week + Future Clues - Weekly Blog # 885

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Better Investment Thinking - Weekly Blog # 832

          

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Better Investment Thinking

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

 

The late and great Charlie Munger gave Warren Buffett his greatest compliment when he called him a “thinking machine”. His compliment implies that Warren is always thinking and trying to improve his investment process. In last week’s post-script at the end of the blog I introduced the concept of needing to focus on the process of selling. Early this week I had a conversation with one of the more perceptive members of a monthly investment discussion group. He was concerned that they hardly ever discuss the process of selling.

 

Selling is often prompted by the need to raise cash or the need to free up cash for reinvestment. Currently, we have quite possibly entered a period where it would be prudent to develop a meaningful cash reserve for later equity reinvestment. Admittedly, it runs the risk of not fully taking advantage of the rising stock market.  It is with that thought in mind that I am introducing the thinking of Professor George M. Calhoun, with some concern as to the structural risk it might expose.

 

George’s views have been shaped by the following experiences.

• For 25 years George worked for various tech companies.
• He is a Professor at The Stevens Institute of Technology, where I am one of the trustees.
• At Stevens, George supervised the development of the Hanlon Financial Center, a live trading room.
• He won a National Science Foundation award for creating the Center for Research Toward Advancing Financial Technologies (CRAFT).
• George is a regular contributor to Forbes.

George Calhoun has written extensively on the causes of inflation, in discussions on: Dangers created by Money Market Funds, Cash Shortages, Recession Signal, Dry Powder, and Contrarian Indicator, parts of which are included in the link to the article below.

 

 

Collateral Damage From Fed Policy (3) – Money Market Funds, A ‘Powder Keg’? (forbes.com)

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing for the Future - Weekly Blog # 831

Mike Lipper's Blog: American Voters Win & Lose - Weekly Blog # 830

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fragments Prior to Fragmentation - Blog 829

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

3 Senior Lessons + Upsetting Parallel - Weekly Blog # 813

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

3 Senior Lessons + Upsetting Parallel

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 3 Seniors Passed This Week

In age order Henry Kissinger, Charlie Munger, and Sandra Day O’Connor died this week. They were remarkable people who lived good lives, leaving numerous good lessons for life. In general, these lessons can be utilized in our quest for investment wisdom.

 

Henry Kissinger was not only a fountain of geo-political knowledge, he was also a skilled conflict negotiator. Almost every important investment contract could use his skills in finding areas of agreement and more clearly defining the goals of both parties. In many instances these agreements went beyond the headline numbers. This is the essence of a happy deal and trade.

 

Charlie Munger, who I have had the pleasure of knowing for over ten years, was a believer in staying within his circle of competence. However, he grew this circle when he could. He was intelligently patient if progress was occurring. He believed in the value of people over historic financial results, both as customers and workers. (This became important as the country transitioned to a service economy, even for the manufacturing companies. Tesla is much more service oriented than the Big 3, with their own wholly owned dealers doing some replacement work, but very little repairs)

 

Sandra Day O’Connor believed in updating decision alternatives in reaching conclusions. (One of the traditional investment problems is, what is cheap and what is expensive? For investors this requires viewing prices in terms of interest rates, the value of the dollar and other currencies, and evaluating capacity utilization, among other variables.)

 

Upsetting Parallel

Current experience is the critical investment difference between the enthusiasm of youth and inexperience. Young and inexperienced investors treat every event as something new, requiring a new way of dealing with it.  

 

More experienced investors recognize elements that are similar to past behavior patterns. This suggests that very little is totally new, most circumstances are somewhat similar to what occurred in past cycles. Kissinger, Munger, and O’Connor were young in the period leading to the “Depression”. Those of a similar age are dying out or no longer have views that seem relevant. We have not gone through a similar period since WWII, which in part was caused by the Depression.

 

Our educational institutions do not study this period and consequently most people know little about it. Unfortunately, political leaders of today also know little about it. The current occupant of the White House waxed poetic about the FDR period upon entering the Presidency, not recognizing that many of FDR’s ideas led to lengthening the Depression, and probably to WWII as well.

 

Cycles are never absolutely the same, but close enough to raise the possibility, if not the probability, of similar results reoccurring. I will attempt to identify some similar events reoccurring today.

 

Global Economic Growth Slowing Brings Autocrats to Power

World trade has slowed, and populations don’t like it. They look for someone to blame and politicians are only too eager to provide answers, gathering more power for themselves in the process. Prior growth has attracted more immigrants, initially welcomed as low-cost labor. However, their growth in numbers has now become a burden to the existing society.

 

Rising levels of crime will bring more policing power and stronger governments. We are seeing leadership in just about every continent move from the center to extremes on either the right or the left. Pay particular attention to Europe, Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, Latin America, and some elements within the US and Canada.

 

China Changes and the World Feels it

The rate of China providing goods at low prices to meet demand in the US and Europe has slowed. The Chinese have cut back on imports, so China’s net contribution to world trade has declined. Wealthy Chinese had been previously exporting as much of their prodigious savings as possible. This has led to a change in the Chinese government’s attitude. They are now trying to attract foreign investment and are changing a number their rules.

 

The Chinese are simultaneously pouring resources into their defense sector. They have more ships than the US Navy and now have 3 aircraft carriers. They also appear to have state-of-the-art missiles and spacecraft. Like other countries with large standing militaries, they have little respect for current US government forces. However, like both Japan and Germany in the 1930s, they are very conscious of the potential power the US could deploy if it had time to do so.

 

Politicians Using Old Strategies in a Changing World

Good prices vs votes/contributions are the key battles. People want goods and services without regard to where and how prices are generated, as long as they appear reasonable relative to perceived competitors. Technology generally lowers prices through increased production and less human labor. Professional politicians want contributions from labor unions that have negotiated long and large contracts. The reduction in world trade will eventually make many nations poorer, including the US.

 

Target the Lawyers

Charlie Munger performed the switch from law to investment management brilliantly. Goldman Sachs also has a number of successful investment bankers and other executives who started with law firms before seeing green. In their defense, some lead M&A counsels at law firms earn close to investment banker packages, with their growing personal accounts residing at money management institutions.  

  

Warning: If some of the trends mentioned continue, the parallel with the Depression is more than likely.

 

What are you doing to prevent it?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Cyclical World + Consistent Results - Weekly Blog # 812

Mike Lipper’s Blog: Recognizing a Professional: Ratings vs Ranking – Weekly Blog # 811

Mike Lipper’s Blog: How to Find the Answer – Weekly Blog # 810

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Preparing - Weekly Blog # 809

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Preparing

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Little did we know that nursery tales were preparing us to be sound investors. Remember the story of the three little pigs who all built homes, but only one survived the storms because he took the time to build with bricks.

 

Later, we grew up and found ourselves in a marching unit alert for the preparatory command, immediately prior to an execution order. We should always have been searching for preparatory signals to avoid major losses and unexpected gains.

 

Last week we warned that sudden rallies are usual in “bear markets”. Only time will tell if we have entered a bear market and if we should identify the following as preparatory signals. (What is your opinion?)

• Perhaps the soundest bank in Asia, DBS, was instructed by Singapore banking authorities to suspend various expansion efforts for 6 months.
• The leading banker in the US announced that he intended to sell roughly 12% of his ownership in the bank for estate and other reasons a year from now.
• In a private discussion, a CEO of a very successful private company bemoaned many companies for not being close enough to their customers to help guide them through the coming problems.
• Both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have reduced employment of talented people a couple times. A major large private investment organization has done the same.
• I went to an upscale department store looking for an appropriate business casual shirt in my size. The store only had small, medium, and large shirts, not the usual array of arm lengths or shirts with 2-inch variations. This brought home the statement by UPS that their package business from Hong Kong was down because retailers were reducing inventories.
• Panera just announced that is laying off 17% of their workers before they do an IPO. There has been an increase in mergers, but most of them are stock for stock deals. This is a sign that cash is too expensive, and their own stocks are no longer cheap.

 

Preparing Oneself

Marcus Ashworth is a brilliant columnist, which means that I agree with him. He wrote “Probably the most underrated skill in finance is knowing when to sell”. It may be wise to first identify what to sell. I suggest the first step is to identify each holding in terms of purpose, as either speculation or investment. The main difference between the two is whether your bet is based mainly on the belief that the price will rise. Or alternatively that earnings will grow, new products/strategies will be launched, new leadership will be in place, or there will be a closing or a collapse of principal competitor.

 

The next step is to find or create an appropriate peer group. (This is easier for mutual funds.) Then, in the shortest reasonable time-period, arrange the peer group into quintiles. (Caution, avoid dividing the peer group into quarters or halves.) If the peer group you are studying is a narrow-based specialty, your best bet is to be in the top or bottom quintile. If it is in the bottom quintile you are betting on the changing character of your investment making it a winner. These types of securities normally do best for brief periods.

 

I follow a different approach for diversified equity holdings. My approach is less volatile than the general market and spends most of the time in the second or third quintile. It is rarely in either of the extreme performance quintiles. These placements are appropriate for long-term holdings with periodic payments to beneficiaries and has the benefit of keeping clients happy and maintaining relationships.

 

When to Sell

The biggest risk for many long-term investors is impatience, which was noted by Blaise Pascal in the 1600s. He said, “All of humanity’s problems stem from man’s inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” This sitting approach works better with large portfolios of high-quality stocks, because over time the gains will be greater than the losses, particularly during inflationary periods.

 

We are quite possibly not in such a period. Charlie Munger recently commented that during Berkshire Hathaway’s (*) first four decades of Warren Buffet’s ownership history it was relatively easy to pick sound investments. In looking at the company’s 3^rd quarter report there were a considerable number of subsidiaries whose earnings were disappointing, but the success of their larger positions more than made up for those that declined. (They have built up a very sizeable cash reserve in anticipation of finding good future homes for their acquisitions.)

* Owned in managed or personal accounts

 

Outlook(s)

The longer-term outlook is quite attractive, with IBES estimating S&P 500 earnings per share reaching $276.02 in 2025 compared to $218.09 in 2022. The current concern about corralling the rate of inflation does not seem to be an issue with 30-year US Treasury paper yielding 4.75%, not much different from the 10-year rate of 4.56% and the 2-year rate of 4.83%. (I suspect that there is considerable amount of leveraged buying of 2-year compared to the 30-year, which is one of the reasons shorter rates are higher.)

 

However, the reason for discussing multiple outlooks is the shorter-term future looks more troubled than the longer. If one treats the period since the beginning of COVID-19 as a single unit, we have been going through stagflation with volatility. One of the reasons the stock market has done as well as it has is due to an increase in leverage, both operational and financial. Revenues have been going up marginally, but reported and adjusted earnings have risen by a multiple of sales. This resulted from an increase in private debt and other forms of debt extensions driven primarily by large caps. (In the latest week, declines represented 1% of the companies traded on the NYSE vs 23% on the NASDAQ). I previously alluded to the number of middle size companies owned by Berkshire not doing as well as in the past.

 

There were contradictory indicators delivered this week. On Saturday the WSJ reported that 90% of the weekly prices of securities indices, commodities, currencies, etc., were up. The sample survey of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) had 50.3% bearish over the next 6 months vs. 24.3% that were bullish. The bearish reading is not only twice the bullish, but entered an extreme reading and was much larger than it has been over the last couple of weeks. (It is possible that the sample skewed differently this week or participants reacted to the news.)

 

My Operating Conclusions Remain the Same

 

Some trouble ahead, with better markets in 2025. 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Indicators as Future Guides - Weekly Blog # 808

Mike Lipper's Blog: Changing Steps - Weekly Blog # 807

Mike Lipper's Blog: Change Expected - Weekly Blog # 806

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.