Failed Expectations: Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips - Weekly Blog # 925

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Failed Expectations

Do Details Count? Zig-Zag Flips

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Was this the week that was?

Last week’s blog anticipated a ruling by the US Supreme Court on the Presidential use of Executive Orders to impose tariffs on countries and products. It was further expected that the President would use substitute measures to accomplish similar goals if he loses the Supreme Court case. Additionally, there was a belief that the government would be forced to repay the existing tariffs to the American people (voters). The new tariffs would probably cause some changes by foreign nations. None of this happened.

 

Instead, the major topic of conversation at the World Economic Forum at Davos was Greenland. Discussions moved at lightening or Trump speed from a military occupation to a not fully disclosed peaceful agreement with NATO forces by the end of the week. The importance of these dramatic changes reminds us of what may be topic one in developing future investment strategies. All of this brief history shows how wrong we can be. What we missed was the significant price level change that occurred this week.

 

Critical Price Changes

Starting with the least followed ECRI industrial price index, which normally moves ploddingly. The index rose to 126.28 from the prior week’s 120.49. The jump raised the year-over-year gain to 6.58%, which is greater than the various inflation measures the Fed and many others use. I would not be surprised to see industrial buyers of products add this amount to their resale prices, after adding an insurance amount to protect their profits against further prices increases.

 

One explanation of ECRI prices can be found in the weekly price chart in the weekend Wall Street Journal, which showed Natural Gas rising +70.0% and Silver +14.57% for the week. Part of these increases could be for increased use of these items in the normal course of business. However, I suspect some of the increased demand comes from trading and/or gambling interests, either on the long side or from covering short positions. The importance of the last sentence is that the size of the trading and gambling sectors is growing, and I believe it’s already quite large.

 

The third price increase impacts all of us in our daily purchase of goods and services. It is the value of the dollar. On Friday the 16th of January the US dollar index was 99.395, one week later it was 97.599. The President has threatened foreign countries if they sell US assets!! (I personally believe this won’t happen, but it shows a sensitivity to the value of the dollar, even though Trump and Xi have both advocated for a lower value of their currencies as mercantilists.)

 

Warning

I have already indicated how wrong I can be. Please be careful in developing your own investment strategy and make changes slowly, not abruptly.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923 Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Both Elections & Investments

Seldom What They Seem

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

  

Gilbert & Sullivan nailed it when they titled one of their songs in H.M.S. Pinafore “Things are Seldom What they Seem”. This title should be attached to every article that discusses the investment implications of the next election and future elections. Currently, almost all the chatter is about the Presidential election, which also gets exclusive attention overseas. This is naive in the extreme for the following reasons:

1. Whoever is going to be sitting in the Oval Office will not likely be there for another term. Thus, they will likely have limited political power on Capitol Hill.
2. The House must start all tax and spending bills and both parties are split along ideological lines.
3. The Senate, with 6-year staggered terms, requires critical legislation to be passed by 60 votes. They wish to terminate the filibuster rule. Politically, the senate is even more divided than the house. Additionally, a number of senators are interested in having a seat in the White House and they typically have larger financial estates than members of the House.
4. Both political parties believe Washington should dictate what Americans purchase by using grants and tariffs. (Democrats favor “EVs” and labor union produced voters, while Republicans seem to favor tariffs. Our economic history shows that countries supporting consumer choice grow faster and sounder.)
5. With deep divisions on Capitol Hill and changing legislative leadership, including the chairs of committees on the Republican side, it is going to be difficult to get bills passed.
6. The role of the Supreme Court will be critical. The present Court believes it is responsible for determining when cases comply with the written Constitution. This Court decided that a prior court decision on Roe vs. Wade was unauthorized. The issue was not about abortion, but whether the “Warren Court” 50 years ago sanctioned abortion under the Constitution. The Founding Fathers limited the powers of the Federal government to those items specifically enumerated in the Constitution, leaving all other decisions to the individual states.   

 

Possible Peak Two Fridays Past

Some investors are more focused on their long-term investment responsibilities than political decisions. However, too many economists have become mathematicians and too many political scientists have become statisticians.

 

Some of the signs that all is not well:

1. AAII’s weekly sample survey of investor sentiment changed dramatically. Two weeks ago, there was 20 percentage point advantage in favor of the bulls for the next 6 months. In the most current week, this position shrank 7% points.
2. The weekly share volume on the NYSE declined 42,209 shares, while NASDAQ volume rose 3,034,261 shares. (Considering prices fell during this period, the increase in volume is bearish.)
3. Standard & Poor’s tracks 32 indices weekly and only 1 rose last week, by only 0.05%.
4. The underwriting of speculative bonds rose sharply in late September and thus far in October. The sharp increase in underwriting was well beyond the need to refinance existing debt. This suggests savvy speculative bond issuers see higher rates ahead when they need to sell more debt.

 

Question: How do you see interest rates in late 2025, 2026, and 2028?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Melt-Up, Leaks, & Echoes of 1907 - Weekly Blog # 858

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stress Unfelt by the “Bulls”, Yet !! - Weekly Blog # 859

Mike Lipper's Blog: Mis-Interpreting News - Weekly Blog # 857

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.