Showing posts with label Energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Energy. Show all posts

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Survival First, Before Growth - Weekly Blog # 958

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Survival First, Before Growth

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

            

 

 

Historic Lessons

The increase in current money is mostly generated by enthusiastic people who are likely to have difficulty surveying basic lessons from the cyclical world. The trick is to know which horse you are riding. Very few investors can seamlessly at once move from one horse to another without being on uncertain ground at times. That is why I recommend a working transition plan that starts with building a buying reserve capable of fluctuating in response to your view of your own situation and the price levels of specific securities.

 

Where Are We Now?

I don’t know, but we seem to be much further along in the development of the enthusiasm fueling rising markets. During the shortened Labor Day week, more stocks were sold than bought during the first three trading days. On Friday, we had a relief rally following a four-week period of small declines. Using equity mutual funds as a useful indicator, at least 85% of mutual fund sector averages fell through Thursday. There were only 15 sector averages that showed gains. Six sectors rose over 5% during the four-week period: Energy Commodities +12.80%, Agricultural Commodities +9.43%, General Commodities +8.67%, Latin American Stocks +7.82%, Precious Metals +7.54%, and Managed Futures Alternatives +5.04%. (As a group they gained from investors nervous about currencies, including the US Dollar.)


Nevertheless, there was still more enthusiasm on the NASDAQ than there was on the NYSE last week, which had 26% of its stocks rising compared to 22% on the Big Board. There was a similar patten for New Highs, with 4.1% on the NASDAQ vs 3.7% on the NYSE. (Clearly, there are a greater number of “AI” related stocks listed on the junior exchange.)

 

Building a Buying Reserve

Every investor likes the securities they hold, but unlike our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren, we can and should rank the relative attractiveness of what we own. A position which has not recently risen should be questioned, particularly if it is selling below the price paid by a long-term corporate buyer. In terms of the rest, put what you own on a list to gradually reduce by at least 30% and up to 50%. This is particularly true if you expect to gain 10% or less over the next year from today’s price.

 

What To Do with the Reserve Cash?

Today, unless you are a skilled fixed income trader, do not own any bonds longer than 2 years in maturity. Remember, the purpose of the reserve is to give you buying power when the opportunity is right. It is probable the sale of the fixed income buying reserve will lead to a small acceptable loss when you sell to free up cash to buy future big winning opportunities.

 

Until the general market breaks, if any new name added does not rise within the first nine months of ownership it should be sold. You can use the tax loss to reduce the taxes you incur by selling some winnings to add to your reserve. (You can repurchase the name 31 days later if there is a new reason to buy it.)

 

Please let me know if you like this approach so I can learn.  

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are We in Normal or Historic Times? - Weekly Blog # 957

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is the Volatility of Data in Hiding? - Weekly Blog # 956

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fears On a Quiet Summer Weekend - Weekly Blog # 955

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Is This The Week That Ends Instability?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018




 Preface

I believe it was Lenin who said there are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen. Possibly, the four-day trading week beginning this coming Tuesday is such a period. In both the Financial Times and her podcast, Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab* introduced the concept of the period we are going through as an extended period of instability. I am suggesting it is possible the beginning of the end of this period may have begun.

*Shares held in in managed and personal accounts.

 

Fund Data Sets the Table

Whether one invests in mutual funds or not, one should recognize that not only do many people invest in them, but more importantly, many fund managers get their training at fund shops. Thus, one can get an understanding of the institutional mind set by looking at fund data. In the five years ended last Thursday, the London Stock Exchange Group published my old firm’s weekly study of 105 equity related mutual fund peer-groups average performances.

 

The average performance of S&P 500 Index funds was 14.05% compounded for the past five years.  There were only five peer group averages that were better: Precious Metals Equity Funds +21.50%, Energy MLP Funds +20.79%, Commodities Precious Metals Funds +18.75%, Natural Resources Funds +17.30%, and Global Natural Resources Funds +16.05%.  There were just two better performing thematic categories, precious metals and energy. The narrowness of performance leadership proves how difficult it was to pick winners for the past five years. The leadership crown was indeed unstable.

 

Another way to identify the instability in economic data is to examine the tails of the best and worst 2 items shown in Saturday’s WSJ weekly price chart. The best was Silver +11.67% and the second best was the KOPSI +5.55%. The second worst price performance was Financials -2.33%, which was half as bad as Corn -4.71%, the worst performer. The gaps between the top two leaders and laggards suggest concentration is at play.

 

Turning Points Possible Next Week

On Tuesday, probably in the late afternoon, SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the US) is expected to announce its decision on the IEEPA tariff. The President has said he is prepared for an unfavorable ruling and has substitute measures in mind. At best this will be disruptive, and possibly inflationary. The ECRI industrial price index, which is normally slow moving, rose to 120.49% from the prior week’s level of 117.42%.

 

Markets are anticipating problems, either from Tariffs or possibly Iran. Sixty-two percent of the stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rose last week, while only fifty-three percent rose on the NASDAQ. The NASDAQ trades more tech stocks and the shares of younger companies. Thus, the junior exchange is likely to react more than the “Big Board” to news events. Retail investors, when not gambling, are more active on the junior market. One possible measure of this is the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey, which reported 49.5% bullish for the next six months, up from 42.5% the prior week. What may be more significant is the 28.2% that were bearish. Many professional traders believe “the public” is wrong at turning points.

 

The Davos meeting begins Tuesday, with many political and economic leaders present and chatting. One doesn’t know what will be discussed and how meaningful the meetings will be.

 

Keep us Informed as to any Changes in Your Views.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

 

 

Sunday, December 14, 2025

Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Are Investors Seeing a Change?

Politicos Are Not

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Was the latest week instructive?

During the low volume week: the DJIA fell -0.51%, the S&P 500 fell -1.07% and the NASDAQ fell -1.69%. One does not know a trend is over until a meaningful reversal of direction has occurred, which quite possibly was the case this week. On the NASDAQ there were more decliners than gainers, unlike the “Big Board” where there were more gainers. However, since the April 8th bottom, the NASDAQ Composite Index has led the US general stock market, gaining +51.92% compared to +37.02% for the S&P 500 and +28.72% for the DJIA.

 

The supporters of the political party that currently occupies leadership in both chambers and the White House cheer these recoveries but appear to ignore other data. For example, real private non-residential fixed income investments, excluding data centers, have been flat since 2020 and is far behind 2023 prices.

 

The Real Problem is Bad Debt Creation

For the “bulls” to be proven right, a large portion of the public’s uninvested money must be corralled to invest in the economy, in sufficient amounts necessary to generate the tax revenues required to support government spending and address the growth of the deficit. Instead, they are doing this by removing the Controller of the Currency and the leverage lending guidelines of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which they felt were too restrictive. To add more fuel to risk capital they are encouraging retail investors to put some of their retirement income savings into private debt investments, even though there has been an increase in bankruptcies over the last four years.

 

Economic Tailwinds

Optimist believe the economy should have the wind at its back in 2026 due to the following positive events resulting from the “Big Beautiful Bill”. However, it remains to be seen whether these events translate into additional stock market gains or if these events are already reflected in current market prices. Some of these events could also be negatively impacted by Supreme Court decisions on tariffs.

  • A relatively large number of taxpayers will see tax reductions in 2026, with some seeing tax refunds early in the year.
  • Reduced regulations should decrease the cost of doing business and speed up the introduction of products to market.
  • The reshoring commitment of over $18 trillion in manufacturing capacity should boost construction and the jobs required for that task.
  • AI capacity construction should continue throughout most of 2026.
  • Energy capacity construction will likely increase in 2026, with the introduction of small-scale nuclear power and construction of a new natural gas pipeline from Pennsylvania to New York.
  • The House of Representatives passed a $900 billion military budget, which includes pay raises and an increase in defense spending. This bill still needs to go through the Senate before it becomes law. Some of these funds will be used to retool the military for modern warfare, which includes increased use of AI and unmanned vehicles.

Various underwriters are predicting that equity markets will generate double digit rates of return. On a long-term basis this is extremely difficult to do and can only be achieved by accepting the risk of periodic losses. By year end the year the S&P 500 Index could see its third consecutive year of annual gains exceeding 20%. Only once, from 1995-1998, has the market seen a 4-year period of consecutive annual gains of 20%.

 

Bottom line: Be Careful

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

Mike Lipper's Blog: Was it the week that wasn’t? - Weekly Blog # 917

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions - Weekly Blog # 916


 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Sunday, March 9, 2025

Separating: Present, Renewals, & Fulfilment - Weekly Blog # 879

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Separating: Present, Renewals, & Fulfilment

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

 First Priority

Determining the motivation of the client and the account’s heirs is key to understanding the performance of most investment accounts. When asking the real investment account decision-maker about the driving motivation, it is often singular even though multiple other motivations are listed. (It often takes many discussions to reach the effective truth. Over time and changing situations the driving motivations may change.)

 

With most individuals, critical decisions are based on selected discussions with highly respected individuals, which may change over time due to changing circumstances. Most often these individual decision advisers are not revealed to the “hired hands” of the portfolio manager. All too often the unofficial managers express their opinions based on their own experience, which may have little relevance to the long-term needs of the account. These accounts are effectively managed by people known and unknown to the professional manager. Thus, the crucial job for the professional is to communicate effectively with those having meaningful influence on the account. Not an easy job.

 

The Second Motivation

The owner of the account should understand that there is a second motivation operating in practically all situations. The prime motivation of the investment manager is to continue the relationship with the present controller of the account, which includes the periodic renewal of the relationship. The relationship rests primarily on the communication skills of the manager in reaching the expected satisfaction level. This is a two-part job, where the first task is setting and updating expectations. The second task is delivering the expected return and communicating the proper expectation. This is again a two-fold job, with the first task satisfying the adjusted needs of the account in absolute return terms. The next part is where many managers fall down, the artform of selecting appropriate comparisons. This is where my biases enter. I do not believe a managed account should be compared to a list of securities selected by a manager. It should instead be compared to a fund portfolio with real expenses and diversification requirements, similar to the account itself.

 

The Most Important Motivation

Most of the money in the United States is managed directly or indirectly for “retirement needs”, which has lengthened over time. “Retirement” can include the institutional needs of academic, medical, and cultural institutions. What makes these accounts challenging is the receipt of money near term to meet future needs, which may not be well-defined in the current period.

 

Currently, the biggest hurdle in managing long-term money is the new economic/financial situation, which is different from the recent past. Most of the time change moves relatively slowly, which allows the participants time to adjust their actions to the pace of change. However, there are some brief periods of even more rapid change where it is difficult to catch up and adjust to the radical changes. I believe we have entered such a period and expect to have more difficulty predicting the future. For a period, we will likely be out of step with the fundamental changes likely to occur.

 

What is Changing?

The following elements of change surfaced last week.

  • Weekly S&P sector performance: S&P Finance +2.80% vs -4.01% for S&P Tech.
  • Goldman Sachs will soon cut 3-5% of its Vice Presidents.
  • Schroders will lay off 200 employees to refocus and improve profit margins. They will also cut their Executive Committee by half, which is 44% family owned.
  • There are $3 trillion ageing and unsold private equity deals. (Retail investors are taking risks in Private Equity that exceed public investing protections.)
  • The US has not seen so much restructuring in the Federal Government, Corporations, Energy, and Retail since the Depression.
  • The AAII weekly sample survey’s 6-month bullish prediction is now 19.3% vs 57.3%. (The lowest I have seen, which is often wrong at turning points)
  • Global financial communities are developing new instruments that can be leveraged.
  • With copper and coffee commodity prices going up, I am not surprised the Fed is holding off on lowering interest rates.
  • There is probably more to the reluctance in naming a bank supervisor than we know.

 

We know that history does not repeat (exactly), but it does rhyme. There is an incomplete comparison one could make with the 1930s, but I hope it isn’t so.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Reality is Different than Economic/Financial Models - Weekly Blog # 878

Mike Lipper's Blog: Four Lessons Discussed - Weekly Blog # 877

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recognizing Change as it Happens - Weekly Blog # 876



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, February 16, 2025

Recognizing Change as it Happens - Weekly Blog # 876

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Recognizing Change as it Happens

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Perspective is Difficult to Read

When gazing out a window while traveling in a car or a plane the view constantly changes, while the view within the vehicle remains constant, similar to the internal changes we experience while investing. Many of us are aware of both the outer world and our own investment perspective, although we are often unaware of the changes in people next to us. Rarely do we focus on factors impacting our own thinking during our travels.

 

Now may be a good time to review what is happening to those close to us, and even more importantly to ourselves. The following list of items crossed my consciousness this week, causing me to consider changes to our investments. In no particular order:

 

  1. While I am aware of the US stock market trading volume growing, the rate of change between the 2 stock markets is telling. Over the last 12 months trading volume on the NYSE has grown +8.03%, while the NASDAQ has grown +57.39%. This indicates that there are two very separate markets. This was confirmed by Thompson Reuters’*, an old Canadian/British firm, through their actions this week. They moved their US listing to the “junior” exchange, which they identified as the home of technology companies.
  2. The AAII sample survey had only 28.4% of their participants being bullish for the next 6 months, while 47.3% were bearish.
  3. The Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) industrial price index was up +6.44% over the past 12 months.
  4. The Chinese marriage rate has dropped -20.5%.
  5. JP Morgan Chase* announced layoffs for next year.
  6. International Mutual Funds were the best performing group this week for the first time in a long time, led by large-cap growth funds.
  7. The Financial Times is asking how big Walmart* can get.
  8.  Until we actually see the final legislation and/or a court ruling, one wonders how the US will be governed. The US executive branch of government is in the courts for changes they’d like to make, after legal challenges.

I wonder how much longer the four international political leaders (Putin, Xi, Trump, and Moodi) will remain in power.

(* Owned in client or personal accounts.)

 

We are at a period in history where multiple large changes are occurring somewhat simultaneously, with significant consequences for winners and losers. Time is a scarce resource and that creates a sense of urgency among the participants. The following events bear close scrutiny as the outcome will be consequential for all.

  • Change in US government – The power dynamic is being challenged in Washington DC and the courts, with a clear understanding that power could revert to the old order after the mid-term elections. So, Republicans recognize that change must be accomplished within the next two years. If the Republicans are successful, the country will likely see smaller government with some power ceded to the states. Smaller government should come with smaller costs, a plus for the national debt situation.
  • Global government dynamics – Many governments around the world are grappling with similar ideological dynamics as those seen in the USA and are nervous about what might come next. This was on full display at the Munich Security Conference this week. The potential for trade wars could intensify significantly.
  • Two wars have the potential to conclude this year, Gaza and Ukraine. Not all are likely to be happy with the outcome. Nor will there be unanimity among those shepherding the negotiation. Rebuilding will be costly in both locations, with no clear indication of who will pay and what deals will be struck to compensate those investing the money.
  • Significant technological changes are likely in the next few years, with AI, robotics, and automation at the center of these changes. There will likely be big losers and winners, where the first mover advantage could be quite significant.
  • An energy renaissance is likely, as the new technology driven future requires substantially more power than what it is replacing. The green revolution will not likely provide adequate solutions for the energy shortages. Natural gas and nuclear power seem to be the likeliest winners, as they provide the most consistent baseloads and the smallest CO2 emissions.    

Each of these bullet points has the potential to be disruptive. Having them all occur at roughly the same time will make for a challenging investment environment. While traders may be able to trade successfully, the odds favoring investing are declining for the next several years.

 

I would like to hear contrary views.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Rush to the 1930s - Weekly Blog # 875

Mike Lipper's Blog: More Evidence of New Era - Weekly Blog # 874

Mike Lipper's Blog: Roundtable Discussion - Weekly Blog # 873



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, January 26, 2025

Roundtable Discussion - Weekly Blog # 873

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Roundtable Discussion

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

We at Lipper Advisory Services feel a deep duty to all of our clients and those for whom we have an investment responsibility. I’m currently taking advantage of a visit from my son Steve to collaborate and will be working with Steve and Hylton to produce this week’s blog. Most money invested in the United States and many other countries is for long-term purposes. While the media focusses on short term results, we tend to look long-term and only use short-term inputs if it helps in making long-term decisions.

One of the critical determinants of investment results is the size and nature of the population. Recently, the Congressional Budget Office issued a long-term forecast on the size of the population that was lower than prior forecasts. This is very important but it is only one of several critical forces that will produce results. One of my concerns is that most populations will shrink and only a few countries will enjoy future population growth. The real force that will drive investment results will be the thinking of not only investment professionals but also of investors. 


In this light I am personally very concerned that most educational systems operating in the world are producing poor results in terms of preparing people to produce adequate lifetime savings. These issues start from pre-K through PhD education. This issue is especially important because most people generate the bulk of their savings through their work efforts.

    

I think that there will be some tremendous investment opportunities over the next ten years but wonder how the median member of the population will do. My concern is that few will be prepared with the necessary thinking, savings and discipline to identify and take advantage of these opportunities.

 

My path as an investor

To the extent that I have done reasonably well as an investor, it’s because I have stayed within a zone that I understand reasonably well. Warren Buffet calls this a “circle of competence”. I tend to focus on areas that other people are not focused on. However, there’s a challenge in that most of the areas not being followed actively are currently unattractive investment opportunities. An investor needs to bring something else to identify real opportunities. They need some in-depth understanding of the reality of the underlying business. That being said, it’s possible some opportunities will be in securities markets and countries I have not had direct experience with.  

 

I hope that Hylton and Steve will share what they are thinking about concerning these issues. It will be a source of future guidance. 

 

 

Steven Lipper

I agree that both demographics and education are important factors for long term investors to consider. My father has trained me well as a contrarian thinker. I think demographics running in the opposite direction of the typical view is an important issue for equity investors. It’s inarguable that a country’s long term economic grow is tied to its population growth (more precisely, to total hours worked, but that’s another topic). 

 

But as equity investors we are not buying future economic growth we are buying future profit growth.  There’s a counter-intuitive dynamic I’ve seen as a small company investor. When there’s a shortage of labor business owners invest more in productivity enhancing processes and equipment. They are forced to do this in order to meet rising orders with a flat employment base. And that increased productivity often increases profits, stocks prices, and workers income. So, as an equity investor I am not pessimistic about the lower projected growth rate of many countries’ populations. Differences in results will come from how countries incentivize investment. 

 

With regard to education there’s much to say but let me focus on the investment implications and opportunities resulting from disappointments in our education system. I expect that for most people post-secondary “education” will evolve to having a greater focus on certification. By certification I mean learnable skills which are in demand by employers and can be verified through testing. These certifications, if awarded by respected organizations, are valuable signals that employers can use to reduce risk in the hiring process. 

 

Certifications also benefit from the dynamism of market forces as in-demand skills will translate to in-demand certifications, providing signals to people to add those certifications. The expanding pool of people with in-demand skills will in turn support companies’ growth and people’s opportunities. I also expect on-line certifications to be less prone to many of the scandals of on-line colleges, as there will be a clear standard and a faster feedback loop. Some investment opportunities should be available for innovators in this area. 

 

Hylton Phillips-Page

Sadly, young people today save very little. Reasons for the lack of savings range from simply being unable to make ends meet to a sense of entitlement for a certain lifestyle. We live in a world where the pace of technological change is both exciting and terrifying at the same time. Technology will allow us to solve many of life’s problems but will also cause significant dislocations in society as robots and automation replace many human functions. Those jobs will likely be replaced by different types of jobs, as they have in the past. Keeping abreast of the opportunities and the skills needed for them is perhaps the best advice we can give to young people preparing for the workplace. This is a time where savings would be helpful, as young people will need all the help they can get in preparing for a future which requires an ever-changing skill set.

 

For those with investable cash it could be an exciting opportunity to invest in those companies leading the change. We are at a major inflection point in history, similar to the industrial revolution or the introduction of the internet. Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics will significantly improve productivity and change the way we approach solving these problems. They will of course improve corporate profits too. Quantum computing is at an early stage of development, promising to solve problems in a fraction of the time it takes today. Increased energy needs will be at the center of it all, as (AI) requires as much as five times the energy of a search not using AI. Last but not least, we have a new political administration promising to reduce regulation and speed up the investment and development process. So, there are a number of force multipliers all occurring at roughly the same time.

 

However, you should be aware of the challenges of investing in technology stocks.

  • One of the biggest challenges is an even better technology coming along and making your technology obsolete.
  • The technology could fail to live up to expectations.
  • There is often a first mover advantage that makes it difficult for others to follow.
  • There are a number of very large and well-funded technology companies that have the resources to be in any business they desire by investing. They will likely have more money and resources to invest than small start-ups. If all else fails, they often buy out the competition.  

 

The dominant performance of the “magnificent seven” is perhaps symptomatic of this change occurring in the market today. However, there are also many smaller companies embracing new technologies and they are likely to emerge as leaders in the future. Successful investing requires keeping abreast of the companies best adapting to the future. Professional portfolio managers and research analysts are in the best position to identify them. 

 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: New World Rediscovered - Weekly Blog # 872

Mike Lipper's Blog: Navigating a New Investment Landscape Amid Political and Structural Challenges - Weekly Blog # 871

Mike Lipper's Blog: Unclear Data Mostly Bearish, but Bullish Later - Weekly Blog # 870



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, January 12, 2025

Navigating a New Investment Landscape Amid Political and Structural Challenges - Weekly Blog # 871

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Navigating a New Investment Landscape

Amid Political and Structural Challenges

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

It seems we’ve entered a new phase in the investment and political landscape, marked by a shift in leadership rhetoric and strategy. Two prominent U.S. political figures have emerged with ambitious proposals aimed at addressing global challenges. Their approaches are novel but lack grounding in the current political and economic structures and are deficient the experienced teams needed to implement such revolutionary ideas effectively.

 

This lack of preparation extends to their inability to articulate clear plans for reshaping the tax and legal frameworks that underpin these initiatives. As history has shown, it’s one thing to suggest sweeping changes and quite another to navigate the intricate process of execution. The political structure, with its numerous committees and competing interests, will likely make swift action both costly and slow.


Further complicating the outlook are legal hurdles. Many of the proposed changes are bound to face challenges in the courts, and state-level resistance will add another layer of complexity—particularly as we approach the midterm elections in 2026. Even the 2028 presidential election may not yield a resolution to many of these contentious issues, as a single-term president rarely has the time or political capital to enact and sustain transformative change.

 

Internationally, the situation is equally fraught. Most foreign governments remain unpopular with their own citizens and their policy maneuvers could further complicate U.S. domestic politics. This interplay between global and domestic pressures creates an unpredictable environment for investors and policymakers alike.

 

Education: A Critical Bottleneck in U.S. Productivity

One structural issue underpinning these challenges is the state of education in the United States. From pre-K to PhD programs, our education system struggles to produce workers equipped with the skills necessary for a competitive and productive economy. This shortfall is one of the reasons U.S. productivity lags behind its potential, especially when compared to other advanced economies.

 

Leadership Development: A Missed Opportunity

Another critical issue lies in how we cultivate leaders, particularly in business. Too often senior managers are not given the opportunities they need to learn, adapt, and ultimately succeed. This is a lesson I’ve come to recognize in my own small business. In hindsight, I’ve been guilty of not providing my junior team members with enough hands-on experience to develop their skills fully. This shortfall isn’t unique to my situation, it’s a systemic issue across industries and is one that hinders the ability of future leaders to thrive.

 

Final Thoughts on Political and Economic Uncertainty

Navigating this era of political and economic uncertainty will require a combination of patience, adaptability, and strategic foresight. While the challenges are significant, they also present opportunities for investors and leaders who can anticipate changes and position themselves accordingly. As we move forward, it’s crucial we address foundational issues like education and leadership development — both of which are essential to building a more resilient and productive society.

 

Multiple Changes on the Horizon

A new administration will usher in a number of changes, adding to those already in place but still in their infancy. These changes are significant and will likely have an impact on us all in some way or another. They present investment opportunities and some risk, so it behooves us all to be aware of them.

 

Interest Rates

The market sold off on Friday, largely as a result of good employment news signaling a decent economy, causing investors to fear a good economy getting in the way of future Fed rate cuts. However, there is debate among others concerning the necessity of further interest rate cuts, as the economy is reasonably strong, and interest rates are already below historic norms.

 

Longer-term Treasury rates have continued to rise alongside Fed rate cuts, as future government debt refinancing needs put upward pressure on rates. While higher interest rates will be an obstacle for businesses to overcome, a good economy should provide opportunities for businesses to excel.

 

There is a misunderstanding that interest rates are an initiator of change. This is a problem brought on by the failure of the educational system.  From pre-nursery schools continuing on through to PhDs. Important changes in the global direction of the economy are caused not by top-down thinking of governments, but by the success and failures of commercial ventures, starting with small businesses.  

 

Long-term investors need to pay attention to the edges of progress and the failures of business.  For investors the focus should be on the development of people working at the edge of progress.  This is not to say that small businesses are good investments, but they are change agents in terms of progress and that is where intelligent focus should be placed. We welcome subscribers’ views in contradiction and occasional support of these ideas.

 

Technology

We are in the early stages of a significant technological revolution, with AI, robotics, and quantum computing likely to change the world in ways we can barely conceive. The investment implications will likely be significant. However, what it does to employment around the world is an open question.

 

Energy

An energy renaissance is on the horizon, not only for fossil fuels, but for nuclear energy too. Small-scale nuclear power plants are increasingly being considered by global businesses in anticipation of the increased energy needs required by our new technological future. Small scale nuclear is now being embraced by the left and the right, so it is very likely we will see some of this trend materialize. Increased energy production and lower energy costs should be a boon to business.

 

The Middle East and Ukraine

We could see peace restored in the Middle East and Ukraine as a new administration with different ideas enters office. Peace in these regions will lead to the necessary rebuilding of homes and infrastructure. It remains to be seen where the funds for rebuilding will come from and what global political deals will be struck to make that happen. While this will be a burden on governments and taxpayers, businesses will likely find new opportunities.

 

The Panama Canal and Greenland

The potential threat posed by China’s control of global choke points has raised the issue of control of the Panama Canal and Greenland. The Panama Canal is an important trade route for the US and its control cannot be allowed to fall into the hands of an increasingly aggressive China.

 

Greenland is expected to be an increasingly important trade route, especially as global warming continues to heat up the planet. Additionally, Greenland has a number of minerals and metals needed for a technology driven future. The control of both the Panama Canal and Greenland will likely be significant global topics of discussion in 2025, with investment implications further in the future.

 

California Fires

The California fires have been devastating in their scale and impact on people’s lives. Over 200,000 people have been displaced and over 12,000 homes and buildings have been destroyed. The emotional and financial cost will be significant. Rebuilding will not come soon enough for some people, and they may just find it easier to restart their lives elsewhere.

 

The cost of rebuilding will place a financial strain on all participants: insurance companies, Los Angeles area cities, the state of California, the Federal government, and people with inadequate insurance. The fires may even change the political landscape, refocusing California voters on bread-and-butter issues rather than social issues. Much like the rebuilding in Ukraine and the Middle East, the rebuilding in California will result in costs to government and taxpayers but will also present business opportunities.

 

Final Thoughts on Changes

Change is often uncomfortable and most of these changes will not be implemented without some problems along the way. However, change also comes with opportunity and those who embrace it will be the beneficiaries. Uncertainty often makes the market nervous, so buckle up, it will likely be a wild ride.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Unclear Data Mostly Bearish, but Bullish Later - Weekly Blog # 870

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Different Year End Blog: Looking Forward - Weekly Blog # 869

Mike Lipper's Blog: Three Rs + Beginnings of a New Cycle - Weekly Blog # 868



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, June 16, 2024

Stock Markets Becoming More Difficult - Weekly Blog # 841

 

         


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Stock Markets Becoming More Difficult

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Picking a portfolio of currently attractive stocks is becoming more difficult around the world, both for the portfolio managers and business managers. This is emphasized by the media’s attention on popular indices, where a small number of stocks are driving performance. The media, marketers, and unsophisticated investors chatter about “The market”. However, today there are multiple sub-markets within the entire universe of available stocks.

 

The job of a good portfolio manager is to carefully select individual securities or funds. No single account should be identical to another. Even if the two started out identical, over time cash flows will create differences.

 

There is a fundamental problem with what most scribes write about securities, as most significant differences result from key critical elements. I will discuss the way the late and great Charley Munger and Warren Buffett might discuss a particular investment. (Both our clients and me personally own shares in Berkshire Hathaway.)

 

Large Caps on the NYSE

Product producers and marketeers are responsible for the bulk of large-cap volume. They are fabricators who repackage raw materials into useable products. The better ones have skills in both purchasing and selling. Currently, the overall stock market view is that many of these product producing companies are in pre-recession mode. New orders are falling behind current deliveries. The market reflects this, with 77% of stock transactions on the NYSE executed on declining prices this past week. By contrast, only 58% of the stocks traded on the NASDAQ were executed on falling prices. In contrast to NYSE companies the NASDAQ has more service-oriented companies, many of which are at an earlier part of their cycle. Furthermore, many of these companies are led by their founders or other entrepreneurs. Typically, Berkshire Hathaway buys companies with good management and keeps them in place. Larger-cap companies rotate some of their managers in training, hoping they will get useful experience at totally managing an enterprise. This experience helps prepare them for similar opportunities at the parent company. Even division heads often lack responsibility for the full business.

 

Playing the Players on the Fast Track

Each week the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) surveys a sample of their members to get their outlook for the stock market over the next six months. In earlier years I suspect the respondents were relatively conservative senior citizens with meaningful portfolios. In some case they were active investors.

 

Having attended a number of meetings with unidentified “wealth managers” trolling for clients. Professionals pay attention to the weekly numbers for two reasons. The first is their belief in the public always being late. (In truth the long-term record of the public is pretty good, although they are weak at peaks and bottoms.) A second reason is that some professionals want to hear from the “public” to catch the beginning of a trend.

 

This week the bullish members had a meaningful jump to 44.65%, after two weeks at 39%. Bearish readings for the last three weeks were 25.7%, 33.0%, and 26.7%. Most of the time Munger and Buffett buy into a declining price pattern over time.

 

Capital Utilization

Berkshire and a small number of others have generated more capital than they can wisely use in their operating businesses. Today it is more difficult to wisely put capital to work due to the high prices of good properties, and short-term interest rates in the 5.25% to 5.50% range.

What attracted their investment in the past was a good manager looking to add a new aspect to their business. Some of their recent investments in energy were this type of investment. These investments did not result in increased capacity, they were preferably a uniquely new project with a good margin when developed.

 

Business Economics vs. GAAP Accounting

Evaluating what a knowledgeable buyer would pay for a position in the marketplace. Long-term potential earnings power at the bottom of an economic cycle vs correct judgement of a fashionable product. As an example, for years car buyers were attracted to the newest looking cars and during that phase car producers were in the fashion business, particularly if they had creative advertising. This was of no interest to the two leaders of Berkshire, who were more interested in longer term control of critical supply chains. GAAP accounting was of no great value in Real Estate and Pharma. In both cases, winning investments were not what is present, but what they will be.

 

The Investment Game is Changing

There are now a large number of new CEOs and I expect an even larger number over the next five years. Additionally, the structure of the investment sector is changing. For example, Fidelity is attempting to get a fee from ETFs sold through Fidelity’s brokerage desks. If they don’t get it from the ETFs they will likely attempt to introduce a service charge paid by their accounts.

 

It is conceivable that growth in the number of companies moving their headquarters and tax status to Texas will result in substantial growth in listings at the newly formed Texas Stock Exchange. This is already causing national accounting and law firms to beef up or open Texas offices.

 

In the past, the custodian function was considered a good business. But as this activity has become concentrated in a few multi-national organizations, it has become difficult to sell smaller custodian firms. When Ford Motor went public, the tombstone included a very large number of brokerage firms. Most of those names have disappeared, with some merging out while others just went out of business. We have seen the same thing happening to regional stock exchanges, where very few of the remaining exchanges have a trading floor. Instead, there are a computer networks dominated by a few firms. When the next structural recession occurs, it is my guess fewer organizations will be left in business. In the second quarter of 2024, a number of brokerage firms, stock exchanges, and investment advisors are losing revenue momentum.

 

P L E A S E   S H A R E   Y O U R   T H O U G H T S

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Transactional Signals - Weekly Blog # 840

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Markets are Fragmenting - Weekly Blog # 839

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Rhyme Curse -Weekly Blog # 838

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, January 7, 2024

Solo Messaging is Meaningless - Weekly Blog # 818

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Solo Messaging is Meaningless

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

“The Floor” No Longer Helps

Years ago, on both the New York and London stock exchanges, it was normal for members to query the assigned market-makers for a supply/demand picture on a stock they were trading. When the system worked, specialists supplied the size of supply/demand and their opinion on the next expected price needed to clear trading levels. This system worked reasonably well until the “upstairs” trading desks of some member firms began competing for institutional size orders.

 

At that point floor specialists believed they no longer had an exclusive information advantage. Consequently, when approached for a “picture” on a stock, they were reluctant to reveal any orders left with them. It quickly became clear from their responses that they were describing their own positions, or “talking their own book”. This was far less helpful in understanding where the real market was and the prices necessary to clear nearby trading levels. Over time, this left the floor to the upstairs trading desks for stocks with institutional size interests. This led to a situation where those without good relations with the institutional trading desks were at a disadvantage. Increasingly they were isolated from the flow of business.

 

The same thing happened to the distribution of news on the economy, where the distribution of economic news became increasingly biased. Today’s biases are so strong that a substantial amount of the current “news” has lost its usefulness for investment decision making, or should have.

 

A Small Example with Larger Implications

Friday’s trading was lack-luster. The three most popular stock indices, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Standard &Poor’s 500 Index, and the NASDAQ Composite, all moved fractionally. The movement was so small that the combined three movements only totaled 0.34%. The Wall Street Journal ran the headline “Major Indexes Eked Out a Gain…” (The WSJ is better than its competitors.)

 

My problem with this is that the Russell 3000 gained the very same 0.34%. (The Russell 3000 tracks the performance of the 3000 largest stocks, including those in the DJIA, the S&P 500, and most of the NASDAQ.) The person writing the headline at the WSJ was giving some comfort to bullish investors and those on the political left.

 

The Missed Opportunity: The Dichotomy

The WSJ also published articles on three other factoids:

  1. “Supermarket giant drops Pepsi and Lays over price increases”
  2. Xerox cuts workforce by 15%.
  3. WSJ weekly prices of commodities, stock indices, ETFs, and currencies had only 16% of them rising.

 

The dichotomy is that while most of the left-leaning media is full of happy talk about expanding the economy, businesses are cutting back on people, locations, inventories, and some prices. One might say they are preparing for a recession, or stagflation. The bulls and bears not talking to each other, which is not a sound position for making investment decisions.

 

Stocks to Buy for Different Times

 In the WSJ weekly price chart, the fifth largest gainer was Healthcare. This is a sector heavily owned by institutions which has not seen many gains. Money-making opportunities look good considering the increasing amount of healthcare needed to be funded, independent of the cyclical economy for pharmaceuticals and health related services.

 

Once the economy bottoms Energy producing corporations will see demand rise, which should last for several years. One way to play this is through accounts + personal holdings in Berkshire Hathaway. (BRKA & BRKB will benefit from a large portfolio of petroleum stocks and ownership of operating utilities.)

 

We also serve investors who have multi-generational payments ahead of them. One of the few ways to play this is through stocks and funds invested in Africa and the Middle East. One of the classical ways to invest is to buy sectors under current price pressure. We think the Chinese region is well worth developing a long-term investment view.

 

Let’s Learn of Your Views.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Our Wishes & Perspectives - Weekly Blog # 817

Mike Lipper's Blog: Dangers “Smart Money” & Thin Markets - Weekly Blog # 816

Mike Lipper's Blog: Searching For Answers - Weekly Blog # 815

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.