A Contrarian Starting to Worry - Weekly Blog # 886

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

A Contrarian Starting to Worry

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

Misleading Financial Statements

First quarter earnings reports, led by financials, are generally positive. Good news if maintained often leads to rising stock prices, which is not what at least one contrarian is expecting. Nevertheless, comments and actions by decision makers at various levels highlighted those worries in April.

• In the wealth management industry, one is seeing an increase in smart firms selling out at good prices. These firms are being paid by companies who believe they need to bulk up rather than do what they do best.
• Some endowments and retirement plans are shifting to less aggressive investments or passive strategies, suggesting the intermediate future appears riskier.
• Buyers of industrial goods or materials are paying less than they were a year ago. The ECRI price index is down 8.08% over the last year.
• Active individual investors, or their managers, are predicting a worsening picture in the next six months. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey’s latest reading shows the bulls at 21.9% compared to 25.4% a week earlier.
• In April, 48% of businesses announced reduced profit expectations, compared with 33% in March. More concerning, 41% lowered their hiring expectations, versus 29% the month before.
• Fewer Americans are planning to take vacations this year. Those planning to take one are using their credit cards less, said American Express and Capital One.

We may get some useful commentary next weekend from the new Berkshire Hathaway Saturday annual shareholders meeting format. The somewhat shorter Berkshire meeting with different speakers maybe cause a day’s delay in sending out the weekly blog.

Since the middle of the last century, we have seen a growing concentration of investment firms and banks. In the first quarter of this year, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citi were involved with 94% of global mergers & acquisitions (M&A). With more structural changes likely to be caused by modifications in trade, tariffs, taxes, and currencies, the odds favor continued concentration. This concentration may well lead to increased volatility and a reduced number of competent financial personnel throughout the global economy. This is unlikely to make investing easier for some of us.

 

Question: Can you show us a bullish point of view where we can invest for future generations?      

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Generally Good Holy Week + Future Clues - Weekly Blog # 885

Mike Lipper's Blog: An Uneasy Week with Long Concerns - Weekly Blog # 884

Mike Lipper's Blog: Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds - Weekly Blog # 883

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds - Weekly Blog # 883

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

Short-Term Rally

Focusing exclusively on short-term data suggests that when there is a strong broad market trend in one direction for an extended time, a countertrend is likely to surprise proponents of the longer primary trend. That is what I am expecting in the days and possibly weeks ahead, a somewhat explosive rise in the general market indices. Below are some indicators of why an explosive rise is likely:

• On Friday, 90.5% of the stocks on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) fell in price. Typically, when 90% of a universe goes in one direction, it is close to being exhausted.
• In looking at the daily price charts of both the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and the Dow Jones Transportation Average, from their historic peaks to Friday’s close they have declined enough from their historic high points to conclude that the last rise has been fully discounted.
• A third set of indicators is the weekly sample survey from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). The sample survey divides the views for the market six months from the current date into bullish, bearish, and neutral. In an idealized state one would think approximately one-third of the sample would fall into each category, although that is likely not the case since it is an audience of stock owners. Thus, the “normal” vote favors a bullish view. Recently, the survey showed a contrarian result in favor of the bears and two weeks ago the split was almost 2 to1, 59.2% bearish and 27.4% bullish. This week the ratio was much closer to 3 to1, 21.8% bullish and 61.9% bearish). In theory the AAII survey’s audience is made up of retail investors who have a good long-term record of guessing right, but not at turning points. Perhaps this time the public is in-line with the professionals.

 

When discussing a possible rally with people, I urged them to use the opportunity to reposition their portfolio for a new bull market, not the old one that may already have concluded in 2024.

 

Putting Tariffs in Perspective

While not perfect as a future model, it may be useful to compare the current situation with the early 1930s. The US was in the early stages of a “normal” cyclical recession triggered by the creation of too much debt.

Coming out of WWI there were constraints on the economy, men were returning to the workforce, the farm belt was producing food for a starving world, and Russia was having extreme economic problems. Additionally, the banking community was pushing out debt to support the expansion of the 1920s, including margin loans from Wall Street.

 

As the rest of the world was getting back on its feet it was better able to feed itself, which reduced the price of food produced by US farmers. Many started to leave the farm-belt, with young men streaming into factories as small farms merged into larger ones. They were increasingly replaced by machines, which were sold to farmers on debt carried by the local small farm banks. The farmers, their dealers, and their banks, all needed to be recapitalized. They appealed to their politicians who passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which President Herbert Hoover reluctantly signed. Unfortunately, numerous other countries followed our lead, which led to a world-wide recession.

 

Why is this important to us?

There is an uncomfortable parallel with our situation today. We have permitted or encouraged prices to rise for eggs, meat, and milk, among other commodities. In other words, we have inflated our expenses. While not often aligned, Chairman Powell and Jaime Dimon are both very concerned. Interestingly, Jaime Dimon is a corporate descendant of J.P. Morgan. In 1907, in an attempt to head off a major crash, JP Morgan locked the leading bankers in his library and refused to let them out until they individually agreed to recapitalize the failing Trust companies.

 

What is the parallel to what we may be facing today? When FDR became the President in March of 1933, with his “brain trust” he like Trump was dealing with a cyclical recession which was not his fault. Somewhat like FDR, Trump appears to be turning a cyclical recession into a structural recession, using tariffs as the tool.

 

What Happens Now?

I don’t know, and I believe President Trump himself does not know. He knows what he wants to happen, but he doesn’t know whether he has enough Republican support to make it happen. The following is a possible path to what will follow:

1. The first not fully completed step, the announcement which focused on the rate of the proposed tariffs. President Trump is aware that there are at least two other critical issues that impact world trade; the regulations that deal with the negotiation of the size and shape of trade and payments, and secondly the price level of the currencies involved.
2. The next phase is the public or private position of the various countries.
3. Is the President really after the negotiation, which he feels is his skill set?
4. Implementation of the trade agreement. How will any of the agreements really work and be enforced. (This is the topic I am most concerned about as it takes skilled players to make it work. We have not seen many of these.)
5. Cheating is to be expected. How will it be handled?
6. The new or refurbished plants will eventually produce excess capacity.
7. If the dream becomes the world we live in, will it be a less artificial world than we live in today? Can we handle it?
8. The time to complete the process, if it fails, will be short. The Smoot Hawley Tariff ended three years after its passage. If the process succeeds, it is likely to take many years and different administrations.

 

I would appreciate your thoughts    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Increase in Bearish News is Long-Term Bullish - Weekly Blog # 882

Mike Lipper's Blog: Odds Favor A Recession Followed Up by the Market - Weekly Blog # 881

Mike Lipper's Blog: “Hide & Seek” - Weekly Blog # 880

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Melt-Up, Leaks, & Echoes of 1907 - Weekly Blog # 858

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Melt-Up, Leaks, & Echoes of 1907

 

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

A sportscaster’s view of the US stock market is that many prices are gradually rising in a “melt-up”. But the owners of the teams, when possible, are curtailing spending. Some of the fans’ happy talk appears to be leaking away, particularly as the return on the value of their assets decline. Those who think only in terms of numbers, particularly streaks, should be worried. For the first time in 40 years the Vanderbilt football team beat Alabama!!! (This highlights the difference between a statistician and an analyst. A numbers hound believes the past is always prolog to the future, whereas a good analyst scans present conditions to determine the odds of a streak being disrupted. It is never zero.) Because of evolutionary changes in laws and technology the past should be viewed in terms of modern times. On the contrary, human behavior rarely changes under similar conditions, although it may impact the odds.

 

Something About the Name of Morgan and Financial Crisis

After a long period of financial expansion and the creation of new financial institutions, it was trust-companies, not banks that were in danger of failing after experiencing difficulty collecting on their loans. (The modern analogy could be private capital funds.) Trust-companies borrowed from banks and were publicly traded, but by 1907 there were concerns that a number were insolvent and would fail. JP Morgan, the man, was concerned and called a meeting of leading bankers to meet him in his library, which he locked until the bankers promised to contribute sufficient capital to rescue one large trust-company. By so doing, he single-handedly stopped the “Money Panic” of 1907.

 

While politicians in Washington were grateful, they felt Morgan had too much power. Consequently, a few years later they created the Federal Reserve Bank, which had supervisory power over large banks. This was The Fed’s initial mission and today it is really their first mission.

 

Jaime Dimon is the current CEO of JP Morgan Chase*, the largest US bank in terms of assets. JP Morgan Chase is the unofficial leader of the banking industry, so it goes without saying they see a parallel to the 1907 crisis. He is pleading for a modern solution that allows small banks to merge without time-consuming government regulation. *We are a small owner of shares in JP Morgan Chase and use the Private-Bank facilities.

 

Other Concerns

• Our European military allies in support of Ukraine and future wars are worried. There are concerns regarding the production of ammunition and other armaments, particularly during the present decline in our productivity. The rise of union workers will additionally shrink the corporate profits used to invest in research and expansion.
• The changing business structure of the investment market. There are concerns that stock exchanges around the world now earn a decreasing minority of their earnings from their initial business of trading and clearing securities. There are fewer brokerage firms, less daily liquidity, and more direct transactions.
• Brief news releases, repeated frequently, leads to a simplistic understanding of the economy, investments, and politics. For example, most news briefs focus mostly on movements in the New York Stock Exchange. However, there are numerous trading days where NYSE issues move in one direction and NASDAQ issues move in the other. The daily movement in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is much more volatile than the NASDAQ Composite. (Could it be that Washington has limited capacity to understand the difference between light-volume moves and high-volume moves?) On an average day the NASDAQ trades about five times the volume of the NYSE. (Part of this spread is the amount of trading between dealers to even-up their positions.) The Year over Year volume for the Big Board is down -11.26 %, whereas NASDAQ volume is up +26.27%. From an analysis vantage point, we see major differences between the two markets. On Friday, the percentage of new lows on the NYSE was 2.4% of issues traded vs 7.2% on the so-called junior exchange. (Is the NASDAQ showing it is closer to a peak after doing so much better for the year?)

 

Question: What are you concerned about?         

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Mis-Interpreting News - Weekly Blog # 857

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors Not Traders Are Worried - Weekly Blog # 856

Mike Lipper's Blog: Many Quite Different Markets are in “The Market” - Weekly Blog # 855

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

What I See and Perceive By Observing - Weekly Blog # 844

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What I See and Perceive By Observing

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

             

Often One Finds it is Difficult to Predict the Future 

I Currently find it particularly hard to predict the size and timing of the next recession. Economic news is sharply split between enthusiastic believers from discredited pundits and concerned business owners joined by the buying public. The index bulls currently appear to be winners over those focused on the near-term future, expressed through layoffs and a shift to more thrifty purchasing. 

 

During periods like this I find it useful to seek guidance from those far away from the worlds of economics and finance. Yoggi Berra was one of the most successful baseball catchers and later became a good manager of teams. He had a unique perspective derived from crouching behind home plate. One of his more well-known quotes is “You can observe a lot by just watching”. Using this mantra, the following observations may be useful. 

 

From the World of Numbers 

1. On Friday there was a significant difference between the percentage of rising and falling stocks on the two major US stock markets. Only 39% rose on the NYSE, while 63% rose on the NASDAQ. (This may indicate investors prefer shorter-term shares that are more speculative.) 
2. Extending the observations to a slightly longer period of a four-day trading week and shifting to prices, one get more balanced results. Fifty percent of the stocks on the “Big Board” rose, while 45% rose on the NASDAQ. (This shows that the general market is pretty much in balance.) 
3. Going out to a six-month outlook for the remaining half-year, the weekly AAII sample survey indicates an even more bullish than bearish bias, 41.7% vs. 2.6% respectively. It’s interesting that both indicators declined from the prior week by almost the same amount, 2.8% vs 2.2%. This is likely caused by a different group in the sample survey dominating. 
4. In looking at the list of equity funds that beat the performance of the S&P 500 in the first half. The three leaders were Fidelity Contrafund +25.6%, Vanguard Growth Index ETF +20.51%, and American Funds Growth Fund of America +16.80%. These three funds represent some of the oldest fund management companies and are the largest funds in the equity business. They also have three very distinct ways of managing money. Fidelity Contra is managed by a single manager and has wide latitude in terms of stock selection, with a turnover rate of 16 %. Vanguard Growth Index ETF has a very low turnover of 5% and Growth Fund of America has a turnover rate of 25%, which is below average.  Growth Fund of America is managed by a number of portfolio managers and the research department. (This demonstrates that there are several ways to perform well. The calculation of turnover is required by the SEC, which takes the smaller of sales over purchases divided by monthly average of total assets. The SEC was interested in identifying management churning the portfolio to generate commissions, so they only used the smaller of the two numbers. Thus, the real turnover is at least double the published turnover.)    

 

Observations in terms of People  

1. This is the year of elections, and the pundits are focusing their analysis on policies, which leads to inaccurate observations. The key is looking at the policies of the losers, not the winners, which is mostly the party now in power. In my opinion the losers failed to execute the solution to problems. One of the slogans ending Tammany Hall’s reign in New York was “Throw the Bums Out”, which is alive and well today against the “political class”. 
2. The media creates the experts they want to quote. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) recently announced the last “bear” has left Wall Street, referring to Marko Kolanovic leaving JP Morgan. When I first read the headline, I expected to read about Jaime Dimon, the CEO of the most powerful bank in the US, if not the world. JP Morgan is a stock I own. In last week’s blog I mentioned the number of leaders of both commercial and industrial firms that have been preparing for the next recession for some time. (In predicting a recession, the exact date of the beginning should be separated from the probability and timing of the event.) 

 

 

Please share Your Thoughts 

         

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing for a Recession - Weekly Blog # 843

Mike Lipper's Blog: Understanding the Universe May Help - Weekly Blog # 842

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stock Markets Becoming More Difficult - Weekly Blog # 841

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Avoiding Many Mistakes - Weekly Blog # 834

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Avoiding Many Mistakes

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

Numbers Are Not the Answer, Questions Are

This is the season of the year when investment managers are often chosen. This is particularly true now, with US stock market leadership evolving. There is a debate between the short-term attraction of growth and fundamental long-term concerns over the global economy and political structure. We may have entered the early stage of replacing current leadership in business and in Washington. Because the future appears uncertain, group decisions through committee are more likely. (A historic lesson from military and political history is the larger the group, the less dynamic the decision.)

 

The first step in making an investment discussion is often to gather the easily available numbers. The first problem with gathering numbers is the motivation of the sources. In the investment arena, the major providers are groups who wish to publish data for direct or indirect sale and/or profit. Another source is regulators who wish to provide standards leading to evidence for lawsuits. Neither of these sources try to help others make wise investment decisions.

 

At this point in my professional life and practice, I am trying to make informed and correct investment decisions for specific users, including my family and myself. The following discussion are some of the indicia I use to ask some of the right questions.

 

Critical Questions in Search for Profitable Investments

1. Rarely the first question and more likely the last, is understanding the motivation of important individuals involved on a personal and group basis. Different answers should be expected depending on whether the mindset is one of a publicly traded investor or a sole ownership, and all gradations in between.
2. Obtain quarterly performance since inception for at least ten years, or shorter if there was a significant change of individuals or operating philosophy.
3. Understand the choice of perceived peers and their performance for the period where their critical philosophy and personnel were in place.
4. Get the percentage of time the investment occupies in each quintile. If potential investors are satisfied with mid-quintile performance, eliminate all candidates who don’t have 75% of their results in the 3^rd quintile. If the account is a significant turnaround buyer, focus on managers with 25-50% in the 4^th and 5^th quintile. (This is based on the reaction of many investors to the pain of losing, which is felt twice as much as gaining an equal amount. If the pain multiple is higher e.g. 4x, the loss tolerance level will be lower, perhaps as low as 13% or in the range of only five quarters out of 50.) If the buyer insists on avoiding problems, screen for a manager that has performance primarily in the second quintile, but no more than 25% in top quintile.)
5. Voting members of the committee, are they making choices or reaffirming choices made?
6. How important are inputs from marketing/sales and trading? Who are the top 10 brokers and top 10 marketers for the organization?
7. Recalculate the published turnover of the portfolio to include the greater of sales & purchases. (The SEC mandated measure is based on the smaller, because of their concern for “churning”. Identify the major sources of inflow and withdrawals? From the portfolio perspective, how much of sales is replacement of positions and how much stems from disappointments?
8. What are the management responsibilities of the portfolio manager and who does he/she report to? Can he describe his personal and major family portfolios?

 

Items of Interest you may have missed.

1. Daniel Henninger wrote a column in Thursday’s WSJ titled “The Counter-Revolt Begins”. He lists a number of instances where decidedly left leaning communities have passed local regulations and laws to bring back some safety to their cities and states. These include San Francisco, Los Angeles, the District of Columbia, and the states of Oregon and New York. Wealthy university donors are also insisting on changes.
2. The global financial community is consolidating as intra-industry acquisitions occur. Computershare is buying BNY Trust Company of Canada. Several top financial advisors at JP Morgan also left in a single day.
3. PGIM of Prudential is following the trend and has applied to the SEC for a new class of Exchange Traded Fund shares for their mutual funds. They are following DFA, Morgan Stanley, and Fidelity. (This may bring more money into the ETF industry. It answers one of my concerns for redeeming ETFs in thin markets.  A surge in bond and small-cap redemptions on a crisis day can be helped by accessing the open-end fund’s resources. Until Vanguard’s patent protection expired, it was the only fund group that could do this.
4. All 32 global equity market indices rose this week.
5. AAII publishes bullish, bearish, and neutral indices from a sample survey of their members market views six-months out. They show rare confusion in the retail market this week, where all three numbers were in the 32-33 range.
6. Also, Copper prices are often referred to as Dr Copper because the metal is used in so many products. Copper has been used as a type of currency in some countries with limited or expensive markets for dollars. This week’s copper prices were near an all-time high.

 

As always, I am searching for good thoughts from bright people such as you.   

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: News & Reactions - Weekly Blog # 833

Mike Lipper's Blog: Better Investment Thinking - Weekly Blog # 832

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing for the Future - Weekly Blog # 831

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.          

The Course to Explain Last Week - Weekly Blog # 787

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

The Course to Explain Last Week

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

Understanding Your Location

Almost all the news events of the last week are better understood if you appreciate the critical functions created by geography. At one time a whole course on geography was part of an early primary education, followed by a course on economic geography in middle school. These courses were pushed out to make room for social topics better fitting the educational establishment’s political views. No wonder so many of the current population were misled by the actions last week.

 

Where the Cities Are?

As populations grew, many benefitted from the values offered by schooling, medical services, education, entertainment, and political practices in towns and cities. Early cities were mostly found around strategic waterways, oceans, seas, lakes, and rivers. It’s no coincidence downtown locations attracted merchants and others. For hundreds of years financial and merchandise centers grew up around seaports such as New York, Boston, London, and Tokyo. To this day, the largest city in most countries and states remain these centers. Not surprisingly, to counterbalance the political powers of these cities, some political forces established state and national government sites away from the commercial centers e.g., Albany, Annapolis, Brasilia, Canberra, Sacramento, and Washington D.C.

 

We are all aware The President of the United States compromised and signed legislation into law on Saturday. He temporarily raised the debt limit and modified the growth and make up of appropriations. The result was only possible because DC has a different power currency than the dollar-based currency driving the rest of the country.

 

The power currency as exercised on Capitol Hill represents votes in the Senate and House, with the occasional interaction of the Presidency and Supreme Court. If their currency was in the commercial world, it would have been fairly easy to measure the dollars to be spent or not to be spent. This weekend both the Democrats and Republicans are claiming great victories. The problem is that the math is questionable, as are the policing impacts on the agreements. Regardless of the academic debate, the value of the concessions were too small.

 

There will possibly be a longer lasting victory benefiting society in the future, as these bills were passed by votes from “centralists” on both sides who resisted the impassioned pleas from the extreme members of their parties. We can build on the small progress made this week to make larger changes in the future, as long as those in the center learn to trust and respect the centrist members of the other party. While I have not done the analysis, my guess is that most who voted to pass these bills came from commercial backgrounds and are used to working to get compromises.

 

A Much Bigger Issue Was Not Discussed

Whether we like it or not, we are all globalists. Most of the threads in our clothes and some of our favorite foods come from overseas. The producers of these goods, as well as the militaries of our allies are paid in US dollars to protect us. We also sell a lot of our products and services to them. The US represents roughly ¼ of world trade. Problem is, the US dollar is the medium of exchange for ½ to 90% of currency exchanges depending on how you measure it. The US dollar is currently the most trusted currency. This translates into the lowest cost to buy products and services relative to other currencies who must pay a premium for the same purchases. This is an extraordinary privilege.

 

The privilege is not granted by an authority, but by the perceived purchasing power of the dollar through a collection of transactions each minute of each day. In general, it is assumed the relative purchasing power is stable compared to other currencies.

 

Perceptions are normally slow to change, but they can move at the speed of communication through transactors in a 24-hour marketplace. In a microcosm of how the market can work, examine the run on the SVB. Most of the loans and deposits were from the “silicon-valley” venture-oriented community. Many of these companies had critical shareholders who were active participants in the community, something the bank and regulators did not fully appreciate. I suspect the run on that bank was started by a few comments within this high-pressure group. The daily foreign-exchange community is much, much larger than SVB’s critical players, although it could follow the same communication, concentration, and contagion pattern. (There is no single Federal Reserve Bank for currencies.)

 

Possible Causes

Most powerful trends initially move at glacial speeds, until they take-off in hypersonic movements. The slow deterioration essentially reflects a slow growing decline in confidence and is often a collection of small actions. Some examples are listed below:

• A poorly executed withdrawal from Afghanistan by more isolationist new leadership.
• A shared belief that China permitted COVID to escape.
• Domestic pump priming and an unwise explosion of cash generation, unleashing inflation on the world.
• A weak response to a border war, with the inability to rapidly supply US Tanks and F-16 planes for coming offensive in Ukraine.
• In addition to government management problems, US industry leaders like JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Apple, and even the SEC, have had management issues that led to public errors. These are not confidence builders.

 

Barron’s Suggest Another Concern

In a four-page article in this week’s Barron’s they suggest loosely regulated non-bank financial organizations could have surprising credit issues. If you add up all the credit and equity extended to individuals, businesses, and organizations, it is about equal in size to the assets/liabilities of the regulated banks. Insurance companies, retirement plans, private capital providers, family offices, investment advisers, and brokerage firms have some narrow regulatory oversight. However, there is no single body reviewing the impact of bailout capital on the broader global economy.

 

I am not sure I want to see a super-agency overseeing the non-bank financial sector. However, it might be useful to have coordinated data collection and similar transaction management principles.

 

Conclusion:

I am unclear as to what the intermediate future will look like and appreciate any thoughts.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: TOO MANY HISTORIC LESSONS - Weekly Blog # 786

Mike Lipper's Blog: Statistics vs. Influences-Analysts vs. AI - Weekly Blog # 785

Mike Lipper's Blog: Insights From a Sleepy Week, Important? - Weekly Blog # 784

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

TOO MANY HISTORIC LESSONS - Weekly Blog # 786

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

TOO MANY HISTORIC LESSONS

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Are we looking in the wrong direction?

The most important task for any analyst is guessing the future direction his/her enterprise should take. The standard approach is to review history. The problem with that approach is most history is written by the surviving winners and told to us by scribes who feel the need to make history interesting, clear-cut, and supportive of the commerce of the payor of the scribe. I have played that role. My problem is that for myself and my accounts the picture is not clear, particularly now.

 

Current Picture

Today’s blog is being written on the Saturday of the weekend before the grand compromise of the US Debt Limit/Tax Expenditure Legislation. We should never have been put in this position! Our elected leaders have had full knowledge of the twin conflicts of debts and expenditures for many months. Hopefully a tactical compromise will be announced within days.

 

There is however a more depressing structural problem facing us. These two problems have been with us ever since our leaders first determined what amount to spend for the perceived benefit of the governed and where to get the money. I am sure there are written Middle and Far Eastern texts, but the first I know of came from the ancient Roman Republic.

 

Rome conquered the known civilized world through the strength of its Roman Legions and superior engineering. The money to accomplish this came from taxing citizens, effectively the free residents of the city of Rome. Citizens elected the Senate who then passed these taxes. These senators had political skills, which they used to get the votes for their leadership. They induced citizens to vote for them by providing “Bread and Circuses”, or in other words food from conquered lands and mass entertainment.  As long as the Senate provided these in sufficient quantity, they remained in power. Upon failing to do so they were replaced by emperors who felt the political need to continue some of the “bribes”.

 

To keep the food supply growing the Empire continued its military conquests, enabling them to award the legionaries the captured farmland which benefitted from the Roman roads and aqueducts. However, the fidelity of the farmers declined over time, as did the quality of their military skills. Consequently, the Empire was overrun by the barbarians.

 

The political lesson for today is that bribery works as long as it continues to increase.

 

There is another lesson, this time from The American Revolution. One of the rallying cries of the colonials was “no taxation without representation”. They got around that issue by placing tariffs (taxes) on imports, and later through the power of inflation reduced the future value of the dollar.

 

In an aging world all governments need to address the increasing requirements of the elderly. China is under pressure to raise the retirement age from 50 for women and 60 for men. We have seen the difficulty France is having in attempting to raise its retirement age by just by two years.

 

Two Different Views

In general, the evolving political views of many Americans parallels their investment views. One group wants the government to be funded by taxes on the “rich” to pay for their growing needs. The second group wants to be able to provide for their families and their needs with their own funds, sharing equitably with those less fortunate.  In most cases the first group believes it will benefit as the economy continues to grow. The second group believes it will be increasingly difficult to create sufficient economic growth to meet everyone’s needs.

 

The second group sees the following signals as anti-growth:

1. Labor productivity is growing less than inflation.
2. Well established investment bankers and law firms are selling out, partially due to the views of the dominant partners.
3. The following financial firms, after studying the issue, are meaningfully reducing the number of staff in tech and operations: Wellington, Capital Group, and JP Morgan.
4. Some Private Equity firms are selling positions at a discount.
5. Consumers have shifted their buying habits from Best Buy to Costco.
6. Shortage of landlords.

 

Search for Conclusions

Please let us know your opinion on whether this is a time to buy risk assets to be sold in one to five years.

 

We close this Memorial Day blog with a quote from Theodore Roosevelt “We must dare to be great; and we must realize that greatness is the fruit of trial and sacrifice and high courage.”

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Statistics vs. Influences-Analysts vs. AI - Weekly Blog # 785

Mike Lipper's Blog: Insights From a Sleepy Week, Important? - Weekly Blog # 784

Mike Lipper's Blog: My Triple Crown - Weekly Blog # 783

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Early Stages of a New Grand Cycle? - Weekly Blog # 781

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Early Stages of a New Grand Cycle?

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Travelers Note:

Many who speak of future seminal changes don’t recognize where they are. This is understandable, as it is difficult to identify where we are in the development of trends, let alone where we are going.

 

Whether or not you agree with my perceptions, they may be useful to you in gauging where we are in the progress of time. Please share your views with me. You can’t avoid thinking about the future if you invest in securities. But by not investing at all you are letting others decide you and your family’s fate. No investment isn’t an investment.

 

Reliance on History

The main tool we have in thinking about the future is our perception about our collective past. We selectively use our less than completely accurate perceptions of the past in projecting our futures. While our learned or experienced views of the future can be helpful, they won’t give us a completely accurate map of the future.

 

The worst remembrance that some seniors have is a period labeled the “Great Depression”. In thinking about the future, my analytical training suggests that this is a useful model for the worst that might befall us. We hope we can survive a similar period and therefore we can deal with whatever may come.

 

Where are We?

Remember this question when traveling with young children? We may remember a partially inaccurate statement from a nearby authority-figure making a guess. This was not an attempt to misinform, but a quick estimation of what was known or believed. We do the same today in addressing the future, using a selection of factoids that lead to a satisfactory conclusion. I follow this learned pattern.

 

When I look at the array of information before us today, the following elements are part of my thinking:

• The best single predictor of the future by a mass of decision-making people is the general price trend in various US markets, utilizing the median performance of US Diversified Equity  Funds (USDEF). Measuring from the peak on 2/19/20 to last Thursday, there was a compound gain of +5.93%. (True, from a subsequent bottom on 3/23/20 the gain was +23.31%.) However, for the last 2 years the average USDEF lost -1.14%. These are pretax and pre-inflationary returns. Obviously, retirement capital during this period was not augmented by positive real performance. For the last 52 weeks, results were even worse -6.59%. In the current year through Thursday, 7 out of 108 fund peer groups lost money, with the same number gaining over +10%. I am guessing the median fund probably produced about +5%, adding little to retirement accounts after taxes and inflation.
• Perhaps the most depressing news came over the weekend in a NY Times column titled “Why Money Market Funds are now Leading the Pack”. They are referring to money funds attracting more assets than any other type of fund. This is typical of a bottom, which comes at the end of investment cycle before a new cycle begins.
• These two elements suggest a lot of investors, both individual and institutional, expect a lengthy period of stagflation. We have had two extended periods of stagflation, during the depression and during portions of the 1970s and 1980s.
• Today we are seeing two types of behaviors we saw during the Depression.
• Empty apartments or floors being temporarily used for parties or other short-term uses.
• Broadway shows picturing past happier times.
• Last week 8.8% of NASDAQ listed stocks hit new lows vs. 2.9% for the NYSE. The NASDAQ led the NYSE on the way up and is still up +17.15% year to date. We should consequently expect it to lead going down.
• There are another two Depression era trends currently reappearing. A speed up in the replacement of CEOs and new ways of doing business. Apple* is an example of the latter. They are offering a cash savings account, not an insured deposit relationship. During the Depression, FDR started the FDIC to protect the bank assets of small depositors. While most people thought the accounts were backed directly by the government, losses were socialized by the remaining banks when the FDIC bailed out the banks. (This privatized the loss in the same way JP Morgan did in the 1907 Trust company panic.) Apple’s current move is backed by Apple, the largest company by US market capitalization. 

*Shares in Apple and Berkshire Hathaway are owned in personal and client accounts. Apple shares are the largest public investment owned by Berkshire Hathaway.

• Inflation is caused by excess demand not being consumed by the domestic economy. Throughout history wars have contributed to inflation, as the government spends money not supplied by the domestic economy. Spending on climate change, poverty, and similar expenditures also add to inflation. Short-term interest rates only directly impact short-term borrowing, having only a modest impact on national inflation.

 

Working Conclusion

While it is not absolutely certain we will have a major economic decline, it shouldn’t be discounted.

 

After depressions there is always an expansion to look forward to.

 

Thoughts?

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Pre, Premature Wish - Weekly Blog # 780

Mike Lipper's Blog: 3 PROBLEM TOPICS: Current Market, Portfolios, and Ukraine- Weekly Blog # 779

Mike Lipper's Blog: What To Believe? - Weekly Blog # 778

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.