TOO MANY HISTORIC LESSONS - Weekly Blog # 786

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

TOO MANY HISTORIC LESSONS

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Are we looking in the wrong direction?

The most important task for any analyst is guessing the future direction his/her enterprise should take. The standard approach is to review history. The problem with that approach is most history is written by the surviving winners and told to us by scribes who feel the need to make history interesting, clear-cut, and supportive of the commerce of the payor of the scribe. I have played that role. My problem is that for myself and my accounts the picture is not clear, particularly now.

 

Current Picture

Today’s blog is being written on the Saturday of the weekend before the grand compromise of the US Debt Limit/Tax Expenditure Legislation. We should never have been put in this position! Our elected leaders have had full knowledge of the twin conflicts of debts and expenditures for many months. Hopefully a tactical compromise will be announced within days.

 

There is however a more depressing structural problem facing us. These two problems have been with us ever since our leaders first determined what amount to spend for the perceived benefit of the governed and where to get the money. I am sure there are written Middle and Far Eastern texts, but the first I know of came from the ancient Roman Republic.

 

Rome conquered the known civilized world through the strength of its Roman Legions and superior engineering. The money to accomplish this came from taxing citizens, effectively the free residents of the city of Rome. Citizens elected the Senate who then passed these taxes. These senators had political skills, which they used to get the votes for their leadership. They induced citizens to vote for them by providing “Bread and Circuses”, or in other words food from conquered lands and mass entertainment.  As long as the Senate provided these in sufficient quantity, they remained in power. Upon failing to do so they were replaced by emperors who felt the political need to continue some of the “bribes”.

 

To keep the food supply growing the Empire continued its military conquests, enabling them to award the legionaries the captured farmland which benefitted from the Roman roads and aqueducts. However, the fidelity of the farmers declined over time, as did the quality of their military skills. Consequently, the Empire was overrun by the barbarians.

 

The political lesson for today is that bribery works as long as it continues to increase.

 

There is another lesson, this time from The American Revolution. One of the rallying cries of the colonials was “no taxation without representation”. They got around that issue by placing tariffs (taxes) on imports, and later through the power of inflation reduced the future value of the dollar.

 

In an aging world all governments need to address the increasing requirements of the elderly. China is under pressure to raise the retirement age from 50 for women and 60 for men. We have seen the difficulty France is having in attempting to raise its retirement age by just by two years.

 

Two Different Views

In general, the evolving political views of many Americans parallels their investment views. One group wants the government to be funded by taxes on the “rich” to pay for their growing needs. The second group wants to be able to provide for their families and their needs with their own funds, sharing equitably with those less fortunate.  In most cases the first group believes it will benefit as the economy continues to grow. The second group believes it will be increasingly difficult to create sufficient economic growth to meet everyone’s needs.

 

The second group sees the following signals as anti-growth:

1. Labor productivity is growing less than inflation.
2. Well established investment bankers and law firms are selling out, partially due to the views of the dominant partners.
3. The following financial firms, after studying the issue, are meaningfully reducing the number of staff in tech and operations: Wellington, Capital Group, and JP Morgan.
4. Some Private Equity firms are selling positions at a discount.
5. Consumers have shifted their buying habits from Best Buy to Costco.
6. Shortage of landlords.

 

Search for Conclusions

Please let us know your opinion on whether this is a time to buy risk assets to be sold in one to five years.

 

We close this Memorial Day blog with a quote from Theodore Roosevelt “We must dare to be great; and we must realize that greatness is the fruit of trial and sacrifice and high courage.”

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Statistics vs. Influences-Analysts vs. AI - Weekly Blog # 785

Mike Lipper's Blog: Insights From a Sleepy Week, Important? - Weekly Blog # 784

Mike Lipper's Blog: My Triple Crown - Weekly Blog # 783

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Week in Conflict Leads to Buy List - Weekly blog # 764

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Week in Conflict Leads to Buy List

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

            

 

 

Trading Didn’t Tell Us Much 

Over-simplification: Buyers largely believe that inflation is the sole problem facing the market and the Federal Reserve will take care of it by managing short-term interest rates. As the stock market went up the first two days of the week, more shares transacted at rising prices. 

 

The next two days saw prices decline in reaction to a greater than expected fall in November retail sales. Department stores led with a more than -2.5% decline compared to an overall average decline of -0.6%, vs. an estimated decline of -0.2%. (Visits to the high-end The Mall at Short Hills in early and mid-December saw a lack of salespeople, incomplete stock, and vacant stores.) There is a second group of investors, some of which were trading and many more not. I call them Realists. 

 

Friday’s transactions were partially misleading in that over $4 trillion dollars’ worth of options came due. Options users often hedge individual securities, exchange-traded funds, and other derivatives. On Friday both the NYSE and NASDAQ traded over 5 million shares on the downside, vs. a total transaction count of 5.4 million shares on the NYSE and 5.5 million shares on the NASDAQ. (Remember, about 40% more shares were traded off the exchanges.)  1.7 million and 2.4 million shares were traded on the upside. (Thus, I am not sure how to interpret these actions, other than them giving us a clue on the size of the speculative market.)  

 

Although the believers will hopefully be right, it does not appear it will be soon. Economists have created an index of leading indicators which are still going down by about 1% per month. The believers, particularly those that are Washington oriented, focus on national numbers. They do this because it leads them to policies where they can harvest votes. The realists are more attuned to measures that track the wealth of the country and the world. This year the aggregate wealth on main street has been rising due to an inflated sample of real estate prices rising faster than public portfolio values have been declining. These people recognize their good fortune but worry about inflation and the decreasing purchase value of their currency. 

 

A leading retail-oriented broker indicated their clients have been buying mostly corporate/municipal bonds and commodities, while selling declining US government bonds. Thirty-year bonds have fallen 35%, the worst in over a century. (Never have they fallen 3 years in a row.) 

 

Commodities are finishing the year as the best asset class for a second consecutive year. Commodities are going up in price because of actual and perceived shortages, both at the industrial level and to a lesser extent at the food level. When demand drops for industrial goods in a dampening economy, some commodity prices will also drop. This is exactly what OPEC+ fears, a fall in demand.) 

 

Brokers also see a sharp increase in the purchase of tax-exempt bonds. Many of these bonds are backed by expected state and local income taxes. These revenues will likely drop when individual and corporate income drops and won’t be meaningfully offset by rising rates for political reasons.

 

Thus, in an attempt to preserve investor wealth and purchasing power, a major portion of their wealth may be exposed to rising interest rates and a decline in purchasing power. After which rates could fall if “The Fed” reduces them. It is exactly the reason I am suggesting long-term prudent investors begin investing a portion of their assets in something that was previously mostly attractive to seniors. 

 

Tactical Reserve Preparation 

This time it’s different in that capital is being temporarily retrieved from risk assets. (The length of time out of the market will be determined by changing investment and personal conditions.) Since none of us know what the future will bring, we should utilize some of our money to defend against the possibility of stagflation, which could last ten years or more. This has happened twice in the last century.  

 

The tactical reserve is best structured by buckets. One bucket being long-term oriented and another short-term. The latter would be kept in locally deposited savings accounts, money market funds, and 2 year or shorter US Treasury paper.  

 

The larger portion, or perhaps the total of the tactical reserves should be invested in Equity Income stocks, an old asset class that is slowly becoming available. For many years these investments were difficult to find due to low interest rate yields. 

 

Currently, 2-year US Treasuries are yielding 4%. In this weekend’s WSJ I was pleased to find 48 stocks out of list of the 1000 largest equities yielding above that number. My filter was common stocks yielding between 4.0 and 5.99% whose price/earnings ratio was below 15x. Every investment has risks and those with yields of 6% or more are believed by the market to have some capital risk. Also, stocks with a P/E above 15 may not have earnings approximately equal to twice the current dividend. Most of these companies regularly raise the dividend at least as much as inflation. Another helpful characteristic is a significant number of shares being held by a family or other interested parties, like some pensions, endowments, and income oriented mutual funds. 

 

While there is some portfolio diversification in the list of 48, it is not as diversified as the broad-based market indices. The largest common denominator on the list is financial companies, with a heavy collection of domestic and foreign banks, particularly Canadian. The list includes Citigroup. Real estate and utilities are also prominent. I was pleasantly surprised to see 3 fund management company stocks I own in order to participate in a growing financial services business. Furthermore, there were names of major holdings in the investment companies I own. I also found some names of stocks I should investigate for inclusion in my tactical reserve or other portfolios. 

At this point the task shifts from security selection to portfolio construction and ongoing management. As we are building a tactical reserve, we need to avoid unnecessary exposure to losses. The first rule is to reduce risks by diversification. The best way to start is to have a beginning portfolio of at least five holdings, which hopefully will grow to ten distinct holdings in time. Pick your holdings from each of the sectors - Domestic banks, foreign banks), non-bank financials, life insurance, property owners, energy providers and servicers, industrial producers of needed products, and utilities. (Some pay dividends in dollars while making their money in different currencies, including commodity aided currencies like the Canadian dollar.) Be careful to limit the maximum single holding to twenty percent of this account.  

 

When operating the account, small cash distributions should be transferred to the cash account. If the prices of the holdings drop ten percent more than the market, stop buying. If prices fall twenty percent or more, consider selling half or all the holding. 

 

Remember, these operating procedures are suggested for the tactical reserve account. A different set of rules and procedures would be more appropriate for accounts having different target dates for payments. The other important thing to remember is that the quicker an investor learns humility, the bigger the ultimate return.    

 

For long-term subscribers who will share their intended use of the list with me, I will make the list available to them.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper’s Blog: What does your 4.0 Profile Tell You? – Weekly Blog # 763

Mike Lipper’s Blog: Week Divided: Believers vs Investors – Weekly Blog # 762

Mike Lipper’s Blog: This Was The Week That Wasn’t – Weekly Blog # 761

 

 

 

 Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2022 

Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

  

Tribute to Frank Harrison - Weekly Blog # 535

We have lost our very good friend and the first editor of these blogs, Frank Harrison. He suddenly passed on to a place of less pain on Saturday night, July 21st. In the last week of his too short life he contributed to blog 533. At the request of his husband and partner of 40 years Mr. Maurice Lane, we delayed this announcement to his many friends and admirers.

Frank was an essential part of our old firm, Lipper Analytical. As our Chief Operating Officer he made things work for our valued clients and colleagues. Early in his career he was a school teacher for disadvantaged children in Newark, New Jersey. He used the same deep concern and patience with all our people. Frank played an important role in establishing our offices in Summit, NJ; London, England; and Hong Kong, where he developed lasting friendships. He also played a critical role in our original office in New York City and our data center and main product office in Denver. In many ways I either didn't know or fully appreciate how much he made my job in managing the firm easier and better. While he was working in NYC during the week he was commuting back to Massachusetts on the weekends. That became too arduous and feeling we could do without him, he found employment closer to what was now his home state of Massachusetts. We never could replace him.

About ten years after I sold the operating assets of the firm to Reuters, I started to write this weekly blog and asked Frank to edit and operationally manage it. He did a great job for ten years, both in his new "part-time" role and his former role as Chief Operations Officer. He was an excellent media ambassador for us, both domestically and overseas.

With Frank's wide circle of friends and admirers here in the US and overseas, my wife Ruth and I would like to celebrate his life and accomplishments. As Frank liked a party, we are planning one in his honor at the Princeton Club in New York, sometime in the early fall. If you and others that share our high regard for Frank would like details of the party, please email me at aml@lipperadvising.com.

Link to Frank's obituary https://www.currentobituary.com/obit/222721

As Frank would have wanted us to do, we must now turn to the primary mission of these blogs, which is to share various thoughts as inputs to our subscribers’ thinking as they address their investment responsibilities. I will share a few of the questions in my mind.


Thoughts to Ponder

1. Most people are focused on the economic (trade, non-trade barriers, taxes and currencies) plus defense positioning between China and the US. They may not have noticed that perhaps the real immediate battlefield is Europe, particularly with its alignment with Japan. As trade may become more restrictive between China and the US, there will be a shift to increase trade with Europe. As is often the case with increases in trade, it will be disruptive to the local market because some of the import prices will substantially impact locally produced goods and services. It is quite possible that the ensuing negotiated prices and arrangements will evolve into a framework for a series of agreements between the trade war belligerents. This may take some time and thus a series of quick agreements before the US mid-term elections may not be in the cards.

Those that have to agree to trade agreements are managed quite differently e.g. command/control, multi-decision power groups ( i.e. legislatures), and multi-national business and consumer parties (supply chains and marketing/distribution channels). In the end these commercial interests will determine the depth and quality of execution. These are big picture questions.

2. Because of what we buy and use we have become unwilling, multi-national participants. As an individual how do you protect yourself from the decisions that will be made above “one’s paygrade”. How do you profit? What preparation is needed for your children and grandchildren’s generation?


3. What are the penalties of downside and upside expansion of risk assets in your portfolio? I suggest that the penalty for the downside is withdrawing from planned future equity investments and the penalty on the upside is taking on more risk assets.

4. Will technology continue to be a disruptive and deflationary force through much lower prices?

__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly atAML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.