A Contrarian Starting to Worry - Weekly Blog # 886

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

A Contrarian Starting to Worry

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

Misleading Financial Statements

First quarter earnings reports, led by financials, are generally positive. Good news if maintained often leads to rising stock prices, which is not what at least one contrarian is expecting. Nevertheless, comments and actions by decision makers at various levels highlighted those worries in April.

• In the wealth management industry, one is seeing an increase in smart firms selling out at good prices. These firms are being paid by companies who believe they need to bulk up rather than do what they do best.
• Some endowments and retirement plans are shifting to less aggressive investments or passive strategies, suggesting the intermediate future appears riskier.
• Buyers of industrial goods or materials are paying less than they were a year ago. The ECRI price index is down 8.08% over the last year.
• Active individual investors, or their managers, are predicting a worsening picture in the next six months. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey’s latest reading shows the bulls at 21.9% compared to 25.4% a week earlier.
• In April, 48% of businesses announced reduced profit expectations, compared with 33% in March. More concerning, 41% lowered their hiring expectations, versus 29% the month before.
• Fewer Americans are planning to take vacations this year. Those planning to take one are using their credit cards less, said American Express and Capital One.

We may get some useful commentary next weekend from the new Berkshire Hathaway Saturday annual shareholders meeting format. The somewhat shorter Berkshire meeting with different speakers maybe cause a day’s delay in sending out the weekly blog.

Since the middle of the last century, we have seen a growing concentration of investment firms and banks. In the first quarter of this year, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citi were involved with 94% of global mergers & acquisitions (M&A). With more structural changes likely to be caused by modifications in trade, tariffs, taxes, and currencies, the odds favor continued concentration. This concentration may well lead to increased volatility and a reduced number of competent financial personnel throughout the global economy. This is unlikely to make investing easier for some of us.

 

Question: Can you show us a bullish point of view where we can invest for future generations?      

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Generally Good Holy Week + Future Clues - Weekly Blog # 885

Mike Lipper's Blog: An Uneasy Week with Long Concerns - Weekly Blog # 884

Mike Lipper's Blog: Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds - Weekly Blog # 883

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Stress Tests - Weekly Blog # 740

                                    

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Stress Tests

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Next Phase

Investors are not happy with the current phase of the market, which could be labeled a transition starting in late 2021 or January of ’22.

We left a stimulated expansion and rising US stock market for a contracting “bear market” and likely economic recession. 

The stock market performed its traditional function by discounting the future and falling before an economic contraction began.

The Federal Reserve was on its original mission, performing the function that it is perhaps best suited to accomplish, the protection of the banking system. (One can question the wisdom of assigning other responsibilities to the Fed.)

The Fed has learned that banks should have balance sheets assuring their survival in potential economic contractions. The Fed consequently required banks to show they could survive possible severe economic conditions, without necessarily predicting them. 

The tool used created very severe stress tests. The way the Fed used these tests limited the bank’s commitment to expansion and dividend increases. All banks passed the minimum requirement in the last stress test, although JP Morgan Chase and Citi were refused permission to immediately raise their dividend.

Many were shocked that JP Morgan was not given permission to raise its dividend. Afterall, the country’s largest bank had styled itself a fortress to defend its depositors from major problems. (Including ourselves) From the Fed’s perspective the bank was expanding too fast, especially if a very serious economic contraction materialized.

Surviving investors learn from changing conditions and I am now applying stress tests to how I manage money for clients and my family.

How Deep & Long a Decline

Applying an overly stringent set of filters to the oncoming contraction is creating stress for me and our accounts. Over the last two weeks the US and Chinese stock markets rose, while bond credits and commodities declined. A rise in stock prices is normal during bear market rallies on below average volume. 

The decline in the other asset types is worrisome, as they tend to be owned by more risk aware investors. In general, these asset types generate less capital appreciation than the average stock and are time constrained. Stock investors often view moves within the fixed income and commodities markets as warnings for the stock market.  

An offset to this bearish picture is to remember that falling prices and low volume should be viewed as an opportunity. Howard Marks, an old data client and very successful investor is quoted as saying “Today, I am starting to behave aggressively”.

Strategic Selections

Picking the highest performing strategy at the exact right time will produce great results, but good luck achieving that. 

For prudent risk-aware investors, a more comfortable strategy is the right combination of a limited number of strategies. This is an artform that great portfolio managers demonstrate most of the time.

My personal stress test perceives the adoption of at least five logical strategies as we exit this interregnum phase.  

Five Strategies

1. There have only been a small number of bear markets without a follow-on recession. One example is the Fed’s gigantic growth of money supply during the Trump period. It came so fast that a “value investor” like Warren Buffett did not have the opportunity to buy large amounts of good companies at fair prices.
2. In a “normal” cyclical recovery, asset prices for stocks drop to sounder levels as probable results are discounted. 
3. Structural recessions usually address economic imbalances through the liquidation of debt, which often requires a well-known financial player to collapse in some financial crisis. Currently, the largest debtor relative to revenues is the US government. (The continuing obligations of the US government are materially greater than its tax revenues, leading to increased levels of deficits.)
4. A depression is triggered by the political establishment policy mistakes intended to solve short-term problems requiring deep social restructuring. A classic example was the tax and tariff policies of the late 1920s, followed by the radical restructuring attempts in the 1930s. This turned a 5-year cyclical recession into a 10-year depression.
5. Stagflation occurs in a period of slow revenue growth combined with high inflation and unwise regulation. We suffered such a period in the 1973–1982-time frame.

The five strategies listed are in rough order of the shortest expected lapsed time in a bear market without a recession, and the longest stagflation. Another critical time scale is your expected investment period. For the longest periods, e.g., a grandchild’s college endowment, very little in the way of reserves are needed. More reserves are needed to offset potential losses due to unfortunate timing in shorter time periods.

Selection Guidance

Over extended periods, the aggregate performance of “growth” and “value” are about equal. However, there are two main differences in the selection process; tolerance for volatility and how the main financial screens are utilized.

Growth investments tend to be volatile based on news. You consequently need to pay intense attention to any element impacting the income statement, particularly net cash generation excluding all uses of cash or buying power.

Value investments appear less frequently in the media and thus tend to be less volatile. This is particularly true if they pay a regular dividend, which is hopefully growing. The adjusted balance sheet is the most important document in their selection and includes the current pricing of all assets and liabilities. Additionally, the value of people, customers, brand name, patents/copyrights, or under-utilized resources need to be added. You need to add all reasonable contingencies, including the shut down costs of work sites and people. In many cases, a forensic accountant and bankruptcy lawyer is needed.

WHICH DIRECTION?

The main reason this blog is titled “Stress Test” is that there are currently “green shoots” of positive information as well as disappointing signs. Reasonable analysts may disagree on both the importance and characterization of listed items in the proper category. Nevertheless, I pay attention to all as possible signals of things to come. 

I welcome all views that agree and disagree the view expressed.

Positives

• The JOC-ECRI Industrial Price Index weekly change was -2.47%
• The AAII 6-month bearish view was 46.7%, vs 59.3% the prior week. (This was a move back from a very extreme position the prior two weeks, viewed by market analysts as a contrarian indicator.)
• Copper prices are recovering from a high price in April due to rising Chinese demand.
• In last 3 months, M-2 money supply growth was only 0.08%.
• Fed funds futures prices are dropping.
• The bond market appears to be capitulating,
• The combination of China producing both a hypersonic stealth bomber and a 4th generation aircraft carrier, should be good for defense spending.

Negatives

• According to the American Farm Bureau annual survey, the cost of a July 4th picnic has risen 17% in the past year to $69.68.
• Tech companies, among others, are laying off workers.
• The Atlanta Fed is forecasting a second quarter contraction of 1%. 
• I wonder how much of the relatively low trading volume on Friday was short-covering before the long weekend.
• The claim that the market is priced more attractively now than earlier in the year looks questionable, as pundits are using current prices and what I believe to be “stale” earnings estimates. The severe drop in June sales may have led to considerable write-downs of inventories and prices. 

IT IS IN PERIODS LIKE THIS THAT INVESTMENT MANAGERS EARN THEIR FEES.

 

Please share your thoughts for the next great investment idea.

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/switching-prime-focus-weekly-blog-739.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/are-markets-getting-too-far-ahead.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/pick-investment-period-strategy-weekly.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Do You Need to Update Your Thinking?

Introduction

Many institutional and individual investors are frustrated by the current levels of stock, bond, and commodity markets. These frustrations have led to inaction in addition to a state of anxiety. Most professional investors and many individual investors have had direct academic training and they and wealthy individual investors have had indirect or passed-along academic investment theories. With the major central bankers of the world experimenting with various forms of quantitative easing (QE) which has not had the desired effect, most of the reliable past investment measures have not been working.

As part of our responsibilities for managing accounts investing in mutual funds, we regularly have discussions with fund portfolio managers. Recently I had an in-depth conversation with the lead portfolio manager in a group that I have visited with since the 1960s. In discussing her financial services holdings she used the very same ratios and thinking that I have heard from this group for more than fifty years. I was struck that the fund's great long-term success was based on a very traditional approach that predates the current QE era and may explain why it is not enjoying its normal performance leadership position.

Recently Michael Mauboussin, now with Credit Suisse, published a list of ten attributes of successful investors which I have further edited:

1.  Be numerate (understand accounting)

2.  Understand value (present value of future net cash flow)

3.  Think probabilistically (nothing is absolutely certain)

4.  Update views

5.  Beware of behavioral biases

6.  Know the difference between information and influence

7.  Position sizing

Analysis of Financial Services Opportunities

Almost all financial services stocks are selling below their book value per share, and so the argument goes they are cheap now and will go up in price in the future. Under the current environment I am much more inclined to view their value is what they are selling for, as many traders believe. Book value is not a valuation metric but a reflection of historical costs of tangible assets. In the destructive era of QE some portion of loans not yet non-performing will become non-performing and thus their historic asset value is less by some to-be-determined amount.

The managers and owners of financial services companies claim that since the financial crisis the firms have added to their capital base and improved their efficiency and credit controls but their valuations have not improved since the crisis, even though their returns on assets and capital has. When interest rates normalize (read higher) their returns will rise, but probably won't get back to historic levels. Putting all of the current factors together these stocks are probably worth what they are selling for at the moment. However, under a higher interest rate scenario these earnings could be substantially higher. My view is that the current owners have in effect an option to benefit from normalization of economic conditions. Thus, the shares are priced right for the current environment, but with a potential "kicker" for the future.

One of the problems in using a balance sheet/book value approach is one is only dealing with tangible assets. As both a buyer and a seller of financial services companies, I recognize that the intangible assets are often worth as much if not more than the tangible. Think of this as "brand value." Among financial services stocks in the publicly traded market, I suggest that JP Morgan^* has brand value and Bank of America^* and Citi^* do not. I would clearly pay for JP Morgan without its balance sheet, but wouldn't for the other two. Even Chase's^* credit card business has brand value. Goldman Sachs^* has brand value in excess of its balance sheet. Just track how well quite a number of ex-partners and senior managers have done in raising money for their new ventures after leaving Goldman. I find it difficult to say the same thing for other firms, with limited exceptions for Morgan Stanley^*.

 Opportunities for Financial Services

Anytime there is a flow of money, there is an opportunity for some financial services organization to make or to lose money. Currently there are concerns as suggested by Moody's* that aggregate corporate earnings in the US is unlikely to top the record 2014 level until 2018. John Authers of the FT suggests that if one wants earnings growth, one should escape reliance on US sources. Fund money is already following fund performance. For the year 2016 through last Thursday, Emerging Market Equity mutual funds’ average is up + 18.50%, Emerging Market Local Currency Debt funds +16.62% and Emerging Market Debt funds in hard currency +13.56%. This is a worldwide trend with the second largest sales of ETFs based in Europe pouring into Emerging Markets. Cross border trades create a need for foreign exchange transactions which can be very profitable for financial services firms. In terms of the growth in emerging market debt, professional buyers conduct these through carry trades with US Treasuries and other elements as well as substantial use of margin. Most of the Emerging Market activities have been in Latin America +36.7% (Brazil + 68.4%) and the following list of countries all with gains exceeding + 20% : Russia, Colombia, Thailand, Indonesia, Hungary, Pakistan, and Chile.

* Owned personally or in a financial services fund I manage.

Perhaps the biggest opportunity for financial services organizations may occur with a new Administration in Washington. While one is reluctant to believe any of the political rhetoric from any politician, it does seem that it is likely that massive infrastructure spending programs will be announced. If these get funded, it will likely mean more bond underwriting at the federal, municipal, and commercial levels. Other increased expenditures that will generate buying is likely to be on defense, education, and health.

Conclusion

There are substantial opportunities for the financial services organizations to make or lose money, but most of the gains will be earned by groups that have talent in excess of their financial resources. Successful investing in this arena will be based on business type analysis not solely on financial statement ratios.

_________________

Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com 

Copyright © 2008 - 2016

A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.