My Triple Crown - Weekly Blog # 783

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

My Triple Crown:

Berkshire, Coronation, Derby, plus analytical insights

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Berkshire Hathaway Annual Benefits

One of the advantages of owning shares in this unique company, both personally and professionally, is having the opportunity to learn from Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Greg Able, and Ajit Jain. The side conversations with a number of deeply involved investors and managers is an added benefit. For me, my wife, and my son Steve, this is truly an educational experience.

 

In terms of Berkshire, the following is a brief list of short-term (one year) comments:

1. The “float” is expected to be higher than in 2022. There should also be earnings from the railroad.
2. They have heavy property insurance exposure in Florida real estate.
3. GEICO will not be getting the full benefit of the switch to fully automate until at least 2024, possibly longer.
4. The stock is selling below “going-concern value”, suggesting it’s a good use of cash, particularly for heirs.

 

Coronation

While the coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla is important to many in the English-speaking world, it is also important to those of us entrenched in the investment world. King Charles produced a more modern version of the over 1,000-year-old coronation with all its pageantry and significance. Globally, he should give us hope we can remodel a financial system showing serious signs of disarray, with the inability to produce good value for all direct and indirect participants. Among which are the problems related to regional banks, commercial real estate, government sponsored inflation, inadequate education, inefficient healthcare, and getting the optimum benefits from layoffs. (More on the latter subject later in this blog.) We should learn what we can from King Charles’s discipline, especially his ability to make painful decisions with a clear view of a desirable future.

 

Kentucky Derby

The Kentucky Derby is America’s most famous horse race, which is unfortunate. The entrants in the race are 3-year-young horses with very little experience. This year’s winner, like many others in the race, had only raced 3 times and had only raced once at the Derby’s distance.  As most blog readers have learned, I believe whatever analytical talents I may have, I learned at the New York racetracks.

 

The payoff after both the tax authorities and track takes their share is important in figuring out if a particular horse is worth betting on. It’s a critical element of my handicapping skill, which I carry over to my financial analysis responsibilities. Not surprisingly, Warren Buffett also learned a great deal from attending local racetracks. One can see this when he explains the key to Berkshire’s insurance success, which is getting the right spread between the rate charged and the risk of loss.

 

One of the determents in this analysis is who you are competing against. This was an unusual Derby in that a number of horses were scratched. The betting crowd (the market) was left without a strong preference or favorite, much like one of the five largest market-caps in most sectors. At the track, the odds-on favorites are often 2 to1, or less. In this year’s race the winning odds-on favorite was 4 to 1. This should have been an alert to bettors that there was a low level of confidence in the crowd’s or the market’s choices. Somewhat similar to a number of market periods we have gone through recently. This filter might have suggested giving a more earnest look at horses with longer odds. Opening up the possibility of identifying a horse with 9 to 1 odds who finished first barely beating the second finisher, a horse with 5 to 1 odds. This type of behavior is why I often favor less popular investments, including small-caps and companies with somewhat blemished records. Particularly when there is a change of jockeys or other key managers. The keys to success in this type of thinking is not the win vs. loss ratio, but the number of dollars won or lost. Or if you prefer, Berkshire’s rate vs risk.

 

Analytical Insights

Hardly a day passes without the media reporting on a company with a new layoff. This is not newsworthy because of the number of people being laid-off, but because it’s happening during a period of high employment where there’s a surplus number of job openings relative to the number of people unemployed. Clearly there is an imbalance, or phrased another way, the people unemployed are different that those employed.

 

This condition requires careful and thoughtful analysis based on incomplete data. I suggest disaggregating the layoffs by presumed causes. The following is a list of types of layoffs and their significance:

1. LIFO (Last In, First Out) is usually directed by HR people from an easy date of employment list, without any further consideration. (I avoided one such occasion personally by going to a senior partner of an institutional brokerage firm which had 5 junior analysts. I pointed out that the likely salaries in aggregate were roughly equivalent to that of one aging but knowledgeable senior analyst. Perhaps my logic or guts worked, all five junior analysts were saved. I left the firm for another opportunity soon thereafter. Of the 4 that remained, at least 2 became productive firm partners.)
2. The opposite approach is sorting by perceived talent and keeping the best. In effect create a talent bank.
3. Friends for life. As I moved up, I recognized that some talented individuals did not fit where the firm was going. I suggested they find a better place and they became friends for life.
4. A layoff can be an essential part of a plan to move an operation, disposing of an activity that no longer fits.

 

Good analysts should try to determine which of the four alternatives most likely fits their described motivation. The LIFO layoff is only helpful in improving overall short-term productivity, as it does not make the remaining workers feel good about working for the employer. This may be unavoidable if the company is a union shop with built in official or unofficial rules governing layoffs. If so, the employer has deeper problems. 

 

In Conclusion

I had a good learning week, and I am happy to discuss my views with subscribers. Whether you agree or not, I can learn from you.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fire Drill - Weekly Blog # 782

Mike Lipper's Blog: Early Stages of a New Grand Cycle? - Weekly Blog # 781

Mike Lipper's Blog: Pre, Premature Wish - Weekly Blog # 780

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.