A Contrarian Starting to Worry - Weekly Blog # 886

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

A Contrarian Starting to Worry

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

Misleading Financial Statements

First quarter earnings reports, led by financials, are generally positive. Good news if maintained often leads to rising stock prices, which is not what at least one contrarian is expecting. Nevertheless, comments and actions by decision makers at various levels highlighted those worries in April.

• In the wealth management industry, one is seeing an increase in smart firms selling out at good prices. These firms are being paid by companies who believe they need to bulk up rather than do what they do best.
• Some endowments and retirement plans are shifting to less aggressive investments or passive strategies, suggesting the intermediate future appears riskier.
• Buyers of industrial goods or materials are paying less than they were a year ago. The ECRI price index is down 8.08% over the last year.
• Active individual investors, or their managers, are predicting a worsening picture in the next six months. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey’s latest reading shows the bulls at 21.9% compared to 25.4% a week earlier.
• In April, 48% of businesses announced reduced profit expectations, compared with 33% in March. More concerning, 41% lowered their hiring expectations, versus 29% the month before.
• Fewer Americans are planning to take vacations this year. Those planning to take one are using their credit cards less, said American Express and Capital One.

We may get some useful commentary next weekend from the new Berkshire Hathaway Saturday annual shareholders meeting format. The somewhat shorter Berkshire meeting with different speakers maybe cause a day’s delay in sending out the weekly blog.

Since the middle of the last century, we have seen a growing concentration of investment firms and banks. In the first quarter of this year, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Citi were involved with 94% of global mergers & acquisitions (M&A). With more structural changes likely to be caused by modifications in trade, tariffs, taxes, and currencies, the odds favor continued concentration. This concentration may well lead to increased volatility and a reduced number of competent financial personnel throughout the global economy. This is unlikely to make investing easier for some of us.

 

Question: Can you show us a bullish point of view where we can invest for future generations?      

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Generally Good Holy Week + Future Clues - Weekly Blog # 885

Mike Lipper's Blog: An Uneasy Week with Long Concerns - Weekly Blog # 884

Mike Lipper's Blog: Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds - Weekly Blog # 883

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

“Hide & Seek” - Weekly Blog # 880

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

“Hide & Seek”

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

Friday’s Victory Signal?

After an extended period of stock price declines, prices shot up on Friday. The “Bulls” hoped it was the beginnings of a “V” shaped recovery, but some market analysts were skeptical. A strong move often ends when there is a 10 to 1 ratio between buyers and sellers, which was the case with Friday’s 10 to 1 ratio.

 

The Wall Street Journal publishes “Track the Markets: Winners and Losers” in their weekend edition. It tracks the moves of 72 index, currency, commodities, and ETFs weekly. It may be worth noting that only 35% rose for the week.

 

The Second Focus

The media, and therefore most of the public focus on daily price changes. Even with the growth of trading-oriented hedge funds and the conversion of former securities salespeople into fee-paid wealth managers, the portion of the assets invested in trading is less than the more sedate investment accounts invested long-term for retirement and similar institutional accounts. My focus is on the second type, which includes wealthy individuals.

 

The Current Administration is Ignoring Us

The first step in security analysis courses often starts with reading what the government puts out in order to develop a foundation for an investment policy. The current administration is the most transactional in memory. The President, Vice President, and Sectaries of Treasury and Commerce made and lost money on market price changes. This has forced me to find other sources to build our long-term investment philosophy.

 

Inevitable Recessions

Studying both recorded history and our own lives, it tells us that life does not move in straight lines, but in cycles of irregular frequencies and amplitudes. Simplistically, we can divide these movements into good and bad periods. However, an examination of the periods reveals differences in how each period affects us. The differences and how they affect us depends on where we begin each cycle, the magnitude and shape of the cycle, and any surprises along the way.

 

Both up and down cycles are caused by imbalances within their structures, which often occur due to other imbalances known or unknown. Most importantly, any study of cycles indicates they happen periodically and surprise most participants. Even with detailed histories of cycles they can be difficult to predict, although the root cause of most cycles is extreme human behavior.

 

While some cycles are caused by natural weather-related events, most economic cycles are caused by envy and/or too much debt. I am perfectly comfortable predicting a recession will hit us, but don’t know for sure when it will occur. (In a recent discussion with a small group of senior and/or semi-retired analysts, they felt there was a 65% chance of a recession within 12 months.)

 

The fundamental cause of cycles is often the result of people reaching for a better standard of living through excessive use of debt, which often results in a struggle to repay debt and interest. At some point the growing federal deficit, combined with growing consumer debt, as evidenced by credit card delinquencies, will force a decline in spending. Reduced spending will lower GDP and production. The fact or rumor of this happening is enough to bring securities prices down.

 

Confusing Hide and Seek

Hiding is not the solution to avoiding a loss of purchasing power, both actual and supposed. Cash is the only true defense, although it is not a defense against inflation which reduces the purchasing power of most assets. However, the biggest long-term loss from hiding is foregoing future potential high returns.

 

Our Approach

I believe a cash level no larger than one year’s essential spending should cover the crisis bottom. Most of the remaining capital should be devoted to seeking out substantial total returns that can produce multi-year gains.

 

Where are these Gems?

Bargains are usually hidden in plain sight. One example might have been the fourth quarter 2024 purchase of European equities, which were priced for a European recession. However, European equities actually generated expanded earnings from Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa. (In a recent discussion with one of the largest investment advisers negative on investing in Europe. Their views were based on their continent’s own economics, while paying insufficient attention to companies growing profitably in the aforementioned regions)

 

Thus far in the first quarter I have been lucky enough to own both SEC registered mutual funds and European-based global issuers. (It took patience because earlier performance periods were not good.) This shows the need to be courageous when seeking future bargains. 

 

We would appreciate learning your views.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Separating: Present, Renewals, & Fulfilment - Weekly Blog # 879

Mike Lipper's Blog: Reality is Different than Economic/Financial Models - Weekly Blog # 878

Mike Lipper's Blog: Four Lessons Discussed - Weekly Blog # 877

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Unclear Data Mostly Bearish, but Bullish Later - Weekly Blog # 870

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Unclear Data Mostly Bearish, but Bullish Later

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

First Half

Marcus Ashworth is one of the best market analysts who writes daily for Bloomberg.  In a recent piece he focused on volatility, with the following introduction:

The election of Donald Trump introduces an 

unwelcome capriciousness to US policy making,

with everything from trade to regulation to crypto-

currencies looking decidedly less predictable. And 

while the US consumer continues to defy expectation

by keeping the world’s largest economy rolling

along just fine, the rest of the world is a lot less

robust. Our key message for 2025: Buckle up, it’s

“gonna” be a roller coaster.

 

It is my own view that even Mr. Trump does not have a complete view of what is going to happen. As shown in the recent election of the House Speaker, members of both the Senate and House act differently than the majority of their party and will be paid off in some known or unknown way. Furthermore, going back to early American history, foreign powers will express their will and influence on our results and actions.

 

Chartists’ Views

We have heard many times that history does not repeat itself but often rhymes. One of the easiest ways to record the rhymes is through charts, which are often right as to future price moves. They have learned that future reversals can frequently be successfully predicted. The standard pattern for trend reversals is a “head and shoulders silhouette”. The three or more peaks with the center one being the highest shows each of the peaks declining to a common neckline. Currently, the two shoulders have hit their necklines and bounced up a bit. Most important to me, this describes the S&P 500 price action. If it breaks the neckline that indicates the likely chance of a significant decline.

 

Historically, significant declines often follow substantial increases, like those we have experienced. Declines often occur after valuations have been stretched like a rubber band. The measure I find helpful is the ratio of market value to book value. Currently, the S&P 500 ratio is 5.37x vs 4.58x a year ago. This seems like quite a stretch.

 

AAII

Many professional analysts look down on the retail market despite a reasonably good long-term track record. Like many others, it tends to be wrong at turning points. The AAII sample survey asks their participants if they are bullish or bearish for the next 6 months. I find the percentage difference between the bulls and bears of interest. The spread for last week was only 1.9% vs. 3.7% the week before. In each case the bulls were on top. My reading is that these investors are usually very intense in their views. The view they share with many professionals is that they are waiting, but don’t know what they are waiting for!

 

Other Straws in the Wind

Many of these relationships could change significantly:

• The bottom third of credit card holders are tapped out.
• The five best-selling car brands in the US are foreign.
• Only 44% of weekly prices tracked by the WSJ were up in the latest week.        

 

Most Funds Don’t Perform

There are 103 peer groups that I look at to see if they on average beat the S&P 500 Index fund. Below are the results showing the number of Equity and Equity Related Fund Groups that beat the average S&P 500 Index Fund for 1, 5, and 10 years.

 1-Year     5-Years      10-Years

   8            4               3

   

Just like following Professional Golfers, the ordinary weekend player can learn useful techniques, avoid many injuries, and enjoy investing.

 

Beware of Simplistic Data

It is popular to compare mutual fund gross sales to ETF sales, taking the difference as an indication of popularity. The problem is fund redemptions are built-in the day a fund is purchased. Redemptions for many holders is the completion of a planned period or condition, regardless of performance. The average age of a mutual fund owner is senior to when they initially purchased the fund. Many redemptions are also mandated by retirement vehicles, such as required mandated distributions.

 

ETFs are like buying individual securities. The buyer is often considerably younger and considers it a form of trading. To net these actions is like purchasing a car for dating when you need a car to get to work or to transport your family.

 

Question: Are there any topics you would like me to explore, or correct?    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Different Year End Blog: Looking Forward - Weekly Blog # 869

Mike Lipper's Blog: Three Rs + Beginnings of a New Cycle - Weekly Blog # 868

Mike Lipper's Blog: Confessions & Confusion of a “Numbers Nerd” - Weekly Blog # 867

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

A Different Year End Blog: Looking Forward - Weekly Blog # 869

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

A Different Year End Blog: Looking Forward

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Using Mutual Fund Data for Other Investors

Mutual Funds reveal their investment performance to the public every trading day and reveal their portfolios quarterly. In many cases the funds are managed by large investment managers responsible for other accounts. Their portfolios by implication reveal some of their philosophy of investing for other accounts.

 

Each week the London Stock Exchange Group publishes fund data that I used to produce. The report tracks 103 equity fund or equity related fund peer groups. Using the last five years of data, the shortest time period one should use in assessing investment performance, only 17 peer groups beat the +14.58% five-year return of the average S&P 500 index. (In selecting funds, I prefer to use 10 years.) There were three peer groups that did better than the S&P 500 Funds Index:

• Science & Technology +17.72 %
• Large-Cap Growth +16.62%
• Energy MLP +14.64%

Remember these are averages, so within the peer group some funds did better or worse than their group average. With only 16.5% of the groups beating the index, I question whether we are preparing a base for a meaningful general stock market advance.

 

Current Structure of the Market

The last four trading days of last week may not be significant but could be. The next two trading days will probably be dominated by last-minute tax-oriented transactions initiated by market makers or late players.

 

In the last four days 49.4% of the shares on the NYSE rose, while 55.8% rose on the NASDAQ. The more bullish NASDAQ players generated 205 new highs, compared to only 73 on the NYSE. Investors participating in the weekly AAII sample survey have been moving toward neutral in the last three weeks. Three weeks ago, the Bulls represented 43.9%, but they only represent 37.5% in the current week. The Bears only increased by 2.4% to 34.1%.

 

Possible Longer-Term Signals

Both political parties feel they should direct the private sector to a much greater degree than in the past. The latest example of this is the FDIC, which has wrung an agreement from the NASDAQ to limit the amount of ownership in small and regional banks. This a long echo of the “Money Panic of 1907” that Mr. Morgan solved in his locked library, which led to the creation of the Federal Reserve. A generation later the US government realized the Fed couldn’t help local farmers, their banks, and suppliers, so they passed the Smoot Hawley tariff bill, which was reluctantly signed by President Hoover.

 

Both the good and bad leaders of many countries recognize that the US has not won a war since WWII. Consequently, the growth of China in many fields is disturbing. Tariffs may protect some US businesses at a huge cost to lower income consumers and eventually isolate the US from growing markets, diminishing our military strength.

 

These issues and others are what we will be dealing with in the new cycle we have entered.

 

We wish you, your family, and friends a healthy, happy, and prosperous New Year.

 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Three Rs + Beginnings of a New Cycle - Weekly Blog # 868

Mike Lipper's Blog: Confessions & Confusion of a “Numbers Nerd” - Weekly Blog # 867

Mike Lipper's Blog: It Doesn’t Feel Like a Bull Market - Weekly Blog # 866

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

SPORTS FANS SELECT CABINET & OTHER PROBLEMS - Weekly Blog # 864

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

SPORTS FANS SELECT CABINET

&

OTHER PROBLEMS

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Go to the Arenas

As we view many contests and competitions, it is clear to us the mistakes combatants are making. Apparently, the President elect is choosing his cabinet based on the following three characteristics:  

• Personal loyalty to Trump.
• Complaints about what the government does or does not do.
• No experience in running a large federal organization.

 

I remember from my sports days, both in secondary school and university competitions, various screams were heard about the details of the front-line games or the details of a move setting up some subsequent play. All we knew was that most of the players were inexperienced in their announced positions. They may have been fortunate in that many relied on what they were taught in school in those days. For example, they could have taught us that stock prices could approximate the value of a stock, or a sound reaction to an event.

 

Today, 80% of the volume of the S&P 500 is passive and 10 stocks make up 39% of its market-cap. One stock is bigger than every other national stock exchange, except Japan.

 

Bonds Speak Differently

High grade US Treasuries bond yields have risen 124 basis points in a year, sending their prices down. However, the prices of medium-grade bonds have been flat over the same period. This does not speak to the quality of US Treasuries but instead reflects the demand for them. Time value (the bond’s maturity) used to be a critical element of the bond market. Today, only 31 basis points of yield separates the 2-year bond from the 30-year bond. (This may suggest that due to low yields, very few of the current owners of 30-year bonds are expected to own them for a long time.)

 

Caution: Keep Data and Date Tied

The Saturday weekly Wall Street Journal roster of stock indexes, currencies, commodities, and ETFs showed gains for 74% of them. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) showed an increase in bearish readings, reducing the spread between bulls and bears to 8%, from 21.5% the prior week. This is a dramatic change. It could reflect a shift in the sample survey makeup. Alternatively, because the AAII survey was taken early in the week it reflected the views of the prior week. Overall, this week’s data was positive every day, suggesting “Black Friday” sales enticed customers for at least two weeks. That is my preferred guess.

 

What do you think?    

 

Happy Thanksgiving, particularly those and their families serving far from home.

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Reading the Future from History - Weekly Blog # 863

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk - Weekly Blog # 862

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Reading the Future from History - Weekly Blog # 863

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Reading the Future from History

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

History May Suggest:

1. The American People Won the Election
2. The Recession has started

 

The Declaration of Independence was signed on August 2nd, 1776, the US Constitution was passed in 1787, and the last state (Rhode Island) ratified it in 1790. Today, Rhode Island still remains the smallest state in the Union. Thus, since the beginning of our nation the rights of our smallest state have been critical to our progress. One of the many things making the US different than other republics is The Founding Fathers fear of the tyranny of the larger states on the smaller states. Consequently, our Electoral College favors state representation over population. In the 2024 election, even though President Trump polled more votes than Vice President Harris, the House is almost evenly split, but he won 36 states and lost only 14, mostly on the coasts or major rivers.

 

This split is one reason I suggested President Trump will likely have difficulty getting much legislation easily passed through both houses, where he only has a majority of about five votes. Of the 14 major issues, only two can be accomplished through just executive orders.

 

Actually, many if not most Americans are pleased with the results of the election. An incompetent government was dismissed before it became even more intrusive and has been replaced by a new administration with untried ideas. New legislation will be delayed by a disruptive Congress and a slow-walking Deep State. Many Americans would like it if the air conditioners in D.C. did not work, fulfilling Hamilton and Madison desire that government work be part-time.

 

Recession Coming?

As someone rowing in a boat with the wind picking up and clouds darkening, you become relatively certain it will soon rain. The question is, will you get to dry land before getting really wet?

 

Evidence of an economic storm on the horizon can be summed up as follows:

1. Stock analysts have been instructed for generations that high quality bonds are more sensitive to economic changes than stocks, at least initially. Currently, yields have been going up (prices down). However, mid-quality bond prices have barely moved at all, something overseas fixed income investors are very sensitive to.
2. Most US stock prices declined this week, with just 37.7% of the stocks on the NYSE rising and only 27.6% rising on the NASDAQ. NASDAQ stocks have performed better than those on the “Big Board” for some time and are cheaper on a market to book value basis. This suggests the NASDAQ investor is a more professional investor.
3. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey of investors indicates the bullish or bearishness sentiment of their investors for the next six months. In the last three weeks, the bullish reading has risen to 49.8% from 39.5%, while the bearish reading only went down to 28.3% from 30.9%. Market analysts believe the “public” is often wrong at turning points. With that in mind, it is interesting that the bulls gained 10.3% while the bears dropped only 2.2%.
4. The weekend WSJ tracks some 72 prices of stock indices, commodities, ETFs, and currencies. This week only 12.5% were up, with Natural Gas up a leading 5.77%. The remaining gainers all rose by less than 2%. This likely indicates sophisticated investors are nervous about what lies ahead.

 

 

Thoughts?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk - Weekly Blog # 862

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

Mike Lipper's Blog: Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Mis-Interpreting News - Weekly Blog # 857

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Mis-Interpreting News

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Understanding Motivations Before Accepting

Investors and other voters should always search for the motivations of people or organizations distributing investment and political solutions. Most of those using megaphones recognize that only a small portion of their audience will react quickly to the pundits besieging them to make commitments of time, votes, or money. Peddlers consequently boil their pitches down into simple sounding solutions. (When have important considerations ever been made briefly?)

 

In terms of making decisions regarding investments, the media is full of quick and often wrong recommendations. For example, far too many investors have been informed that the rise or fall of interest rates, as determined by the Federal Reserve, is the key determinant of future investment performance and the growth of global economies.

 

As a trained sceptic and rarely a bettor on favorites at the racetrack or in other competitive games, I suggest interest rate changes result from the numerous impacts of identified and unidentified forces. I believe the following factors should be considered:

1. Remember, the Fed was created to replace the power of J.P. Morgan, the man, the bank, and the use of his locked library. During the Wall Street crash in 1907 numerous trust companies were failing, with still more expected to fail. Mr. Morgan called for a meeting of the leading bankers in his library. After assembling the bankers in the library, he locked the doors and stated he would not unlock them until all bankers committed funds to the bailout of a failing trust company that had made poor loans. The Washington government felt too much power was entrusted to one man. Relatively soon after they organized the Federal Reserve Bank. With an eye to public relations, they never specifically stated the real reason for creating the Fed, which was to reduce the risks of bank failures due to bad loans. Bank failures continue to be a risk in the US, and some have occurred in numerous other countries in Europe and Asia. Today, the Fed has supervisory power over a portion of US banks, which is their first order of business.
2. Demographics and Psychographics change slowly most of the time but have long-term impacts on our financial and political structure. An example is our falling birthrates and the fall in educational standards, which probably leads to declining productivity levels.
3. Both trade and military wars create imbalances, which in turn cause global economic changes.
4. Discoveries of natural resources and those made in a laboratory can cause economic and political disruptions Remember what the discovery of gold in Latin America did to the economies of Europe and America. The discovery of oil in the US and Saudi Arabia was equally disruptive of the status quo.
5. The personalities of leaders and managers are very different in terms of their focus on the short and long-term decisions.  

 

Since we don’t conduct in depth psychological interviews with a wide sample of the economy, we don’t know why people act the way they do. We tend to believe that events occur close to when decisions are made. This has led to following beliefs and their assumed stimuluses:

1. Clark Gabel’s appearance in a film bare chested killed subsequent undershirt sales.
2. After the movie Matrix 2, Cadillac dealers couldn’t keep large SUVs in stock due to sales demand.
3. The lipstick indicator and the length of women’s skirts were each believed to predict the direction of the stock market.

 

I don’t know what will cause of the next recession or depression, but one or more of the non-Fed rate cuts may be the first indicator of problems ahead and deserve to be watched.

 

Some Attention Should be Paid to the Following Factors

1. One of the causes of WWII was the US putting an oil Embargo on Japan. The same administration had our aircraft carrier leave Pearl Harbor without protective support ships in December 1941. (It was the planes from these carriers that led to a victory around Midway.)
2. More recently, there has been a 75% decline in commercial flights from China to the US. Most of the decline due to reductions by Chinese airlines.
3.  Around the world, bank depositors are moving up to half their money into investments, accepting the risk that goes along with it.
4. A survey of Japanese workers suggests that 25% will be searching for jobs in 2025. (Lifetime employment used to be standard in Japan.)
5. 20% of Indian retail investors are accepting risk.
6. Manufacturing has hired less people in three out of the last four months. Even more significant for our country is an increase in short-term consumption spending, not longer-term investment needs.
7. People have diverse views regarding investments and other expenditures. The prices for NYSE and NASDAQ stocks rose this week, while the plurality of bullish views declined in the AAII weekly sample survey. In the latest week, the bulls had an 18% advantage over the bears, down from a 26% advantage the prior week.

 

Please share your thoughts.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors Not Traders Are Worried - Weekly Blog # 856

Mike Lipper's Blog: Many Quite Different Markets are in “The Market” - Weekly Blog # 855

Mike Lipper's Blog: Implications from 2 different markets - Weekly Blog # 854

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Detective Work of Analysts - Weekly Blog # 847

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Detective Work of Analysts

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

Similarities

Good professional securities analysts are not captives of media pundits or most salespeople. They often build their analyses using small details from obscure sources. This is the approach I use each week in preparing the blog. I gather bits of information for a myriad of sources to build a collection of factoids, some of which may be true and useful.

 

What follows is this week’s collection, separated into come-to-mind file folders which are easy to discard.

 

Market Clues

Citigroup regularly produces market judgements that rely on their own data and other indicators. Most interesting to me is their prediction for specific dates a year in the future. They also study their past guesses and claim to be accurate 80% of the time. This is surprising!

 

As has been noted several times in these blogs, I learned analysis at the New York racetracks where the favorites win about half the time, pre-tax and pre-expenses. In my study of professional securities analysts touting their records when seeking employment, their lifetime success ratios are rarely in the mid-60s% when adjusted for appropriate expenses and taxes. There are a number that have very commendable records because they hold winning combinations for a long time, keeping their investments at work.

 

This adjustment to performance data is critical in comparing investment returns. Quite a number of investment returns in the second quarter were single digit results. However, many investors look only at longer returns where results are generally positive.

 

Misreading Performance Data

Like many analysts I look at the weekly summary survey data from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). They survey their members to get their market outlook for the next six months, indicating whether they are bullish, bearish, or neutral. This latest week 43.2% were bullish and 31.7% were bearish. This satisfied the bulls and other pundits. The week prior the bullish count was 52.7% and the bearish count was 23.4%. Comparing the two weeks I see a flashing yellow caution light. Professional market analysts consider any reading over 50% unsustainable, but of real concern was the unnerving 29.3% spread between the bulls and bears. The spread for the current week was a little more normal at 11.5%.

 

The decline in the bull/bear spread may be a fluke, or a meaningful signal that the bulls were too enthusiastic. The political news may have created the flip. Chatting with institutional investors, they believe the election is not yet a significant enough factor to cause a change in investment exposure.

 

One of the rising stock groups has been the banks who expect their “NIM” (Net Investment Margin) to be higher in 2025, either because of lower rates increasing demand for loans, or rates being higher and loan demand being enforced.

 

Why Are Interest so High?

No one wants to accept the responsibility for interest rates, not the executive branch nor Congress. Washington plays the game of taking credit for “good things” and avoids being tagged with “bad things”. A number of years ago Congress was able to shift responsibility to the Federal Reserve via its Second Mandate of controlling the level of prices using short-term interest rates, their major weapon. These rates are part of the cost package individuals and companies must deal with. The Fed does not control labor costs, quantities, quality, global trade, or the rate of innovation and invention. The partnership of the Executive and The Executive and Congress control these items, with only the Supreme Court beyond. This partnership has managed these factors since colonial times, particularly at election time. COVID proved to be an excellent time to target the expected vote with money, paying little attention to the inflationary impacts of excess money creation.

 

Tariffs as a Tax Collector

The founding fathers did not have an efficient way to get money to pay for their   war and peace expenses. They adopted the European approach of raising money through tariffs and paid their bills this way for many years. Later, the Internal Revenue Service was able to collect income taxes. By the 1920s tariffs were a less important part of government. Farmers, businesses, and people borrowed money in the twenties, creating high spending and debt. Herbert Hoover, a conservative President, was talked into signing the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, which hurt the sales of farm goods and damaged farmers and farm focused banks. This led to other countries going into depressions and was a cause of WWI. As both presidential candidates display a lack of understanding of economics, we could well repeat the global problems of the 1930s.

 

What One Can Learn from Chocolate?

One of the repeated lessons from Chocolate is that European commodity players like trading Cocoa because of its low margin requirements and high fluctuations. The players periodically got wiped out and attempted to recoup their losses in the coffee market, which is bigger.

 

With that as a background and my unintended ownership in Nestle, I was fascinated by their management accounting. They developed an approach where they created “Real Internal Growth” (RIG). This number excludes price changes and interest rate fluctuations in determining real demand for their products. Currently, they see a shift in demand to cheaper lines for both chocolate products and pet food. (Walmart and Amazon have noted similar consumer reactions.)

 

Working Conclusion:

The financial world is seeing a different future than the real world of the consumer.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Our Self-Appointed Mission - Weekly Blog # 846

Mike Lipper's Blog: We are Never Fully Prepared - Weekly Blog # 845

Mike Lipper's Blog: What I See and Perceive By Observing - Weekly Blog # 844

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Trade, Invest, and/or Sell - Weekly Blog # 836

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Trade, Invest, and/or Sell

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

      

       

 

Every moment of our investment lives we accept the choice and risk of investing in equities, or alternatively accept the risk of not investing in equities. There are two valuable insights that may be helpful in reaching your investment posture.

 

The first insight rests on investment history. John Auters, a well-respected columnist now with Bloomberg wrote this week “History is clear it’s very, very dangerous to get out of stocks.” He was relying on data from Barclays using average annual returns for each component: cash, bonds, and stocks, covering the 20, 10, 5, & 1-year periods. The study showed stocks outperforming cash and bonds for each slice of investment history. This was not surprising, stock investors expected it.  What was surprising was the absence of a single 20-year period of losing money. This should provide some comfort to the two university investment committees on which I serve, as well as other long-term non-profits and those who supervise inter-generational trusts. (Due to a more strenuous history in the UK, a 23-year period will produce the same results as the US.)

 

When thinking of strategy, it would be prudent to remember the wise words of Jaime Dimon, the 20-year CEO of JP Morgan Chase, the most intensely managed global bank. He said, “We know we are going to be wrong”. (The key is recognizing the mistake and correct it.)

 

What about Bonds

We are on the verge of generating US Treasury yields of 5%+, with high quality corporates already at that level. Because of a hike in the Fed rate or some other driver, we may possibly be dealing with 2 - 30-year treasury yields reaching 5% or higher. If that were to happen it could harken back to the years when the retail market and some institutions plowed money into the “magic fives”, which attracted cash and/or redemption cash from funds, bank accounts, or the sale of equities.

 

With US Treasuries generally accepted as the safest investment vehicle, there was a rush to own them. Since 1928 there have been 19 years where yields on US Treasuries were negative. Not bad, 97 years with no defaults. (Mutual funds owning a portfolio of bonds continuously buy treasuries, so they don’t have a fixed maturity or a date certain when the holder will receive full payment of principal and interest, which the owner of the actual individual bonds does). Thus, there is low risk to the owner of bonds, which should be considered for a below equity return, with the odds suggesting a positive return.

 

Potential Worry List

There is an overabundance of favorable news from largely left media-oriented sources, with little or any balance. There is a need to identify what could go wrong. Some suggest the radio operator of the Titanic was too busy sending out congratulatory messages to receive iceberg warnings on its maiden voyage. (Is the list of worries analogous to the iceberg messages not received by the ship’s senior officers?) History suggests we could be surprised by governmental activities until the end of 2024.

• The feedback communications loop is getting weaker. Print advertisements are dropping at both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. One day last week the eastern edition of the Journal was reduced to one section, rather than the usual multiple sections. Major ad agencies are reporting weak advertising revenues. Much of the decline is probably a function of less advertising by the big box department stores, except by those closing branches.
• The shopping habits of lower income customers are changing, with lower priced merchandise replacing higher priced brands.
• Industrial product prices rose +1.87% last week after a period of little movement. On a year-to-date basis industrial prices have risen 3.56%. (I wonder if the long-term inflation rate will settle in the 3-4% range rather than the 2% level stated by the New Zealand central bank.)
• Some manufacturers have noted some of their customers building a stash of their supplier’s products, delaying sales by the producer. (I don’t know if this is due to past supply-chain issues and/or the customer hedging against future inflated prices. The second occurs more frequently in countries where short-term interest rates are high or not available.
• Revenue dollars are reported, what is not reported is the number of transactions. In some cases when unit growth is meaningfully below revenue, prices have likely risen, which is not likely to be a frequent event. (As an analyst trying to predict the future growth rate, I would reduce the future revenue growth rate. It is much more difficult to project the impact of future profit margin improvements. It may be wise to use a 10-year average, excluding any double-digit year.)
• The developed world needs more productive workers. April job creation in the US was the second lowest going back to at least January 2022. The US birth rate has been below the replacement rate for some time.
• Stock markets participants are sending mixed messages. Of the 32 weekly stock price indices published by S&P Dow Jones, 28 rose and 4 fell, with 3 being overseas and one domestic.
• The AAII sample survey shows 40.8% bullish and 32.1% bearish for the next 6 months. The bulls are much more volatile, their reading three weeks ago was 23.8%. Over the same period the bears declined from 35.9%.
• Transactions in the markets were also split. 35% of the volume on the NYSE fell, while 45% on the NASDAQ declined.
• In terms of the leading fund performance by sector. Though Thursday the utility sector led with +4.53%. The worst performance was generated by Indian Region funds, with a return of -2.77%.

 

Unlike the captain and crew, I am aware of risks and have a buying reserve and many holdings.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Secular Investment Religions - Weekly Blog # 835

Mike Lipper's Blog: Avoiding Many Mistakes - Weekly Blog # 834

Mike Lipper's Blog: News & Reactions - Weekly Blog # 833

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

       

 

Solo Messaging is Meaningless - Weekly Blog # 818

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Solo Messaging is Meaningless

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

“The Floor” No Longer Helps

Years ago, on both the New York and London stock exchanges, it was normal for members to query the assigned market-makers for a supply/demand picture on a stock they were trading. When the system worked, specialists supplied the size of supply/demand and their opinion on the next expected price needed to clear trading levels. This system worked reasonably well until the “upstairs” trading desks of some member firms began competing for institutional size orders.

 

At that point floor specialists believed they no longer had an exclusive information advantage. Consequently, when approached for a “picture” on a stock, they were reluctant to reveal any orders left with them. It quickly became clear from their responses that they were describing their own positions, or “talking their own book”. This was far less helpful in understanding where the real market was and the prices necessary to clear nearby trading levels. Over time, this left the floor to the upstairs trading desks for stocks with institutional size interests. This led to a situation where those without good relations with the institutional trading desks were at a disadvantage. Increasingly they were isolated from the flow of business.

 

The same thing happened to the distribution of news on the economy, where the distribution of economic news became increasingly biased. Today’s biases are so strong that a substantial amount of the current “news” has lost its usefulness for investment decision making, or should have.

 

A Small Example with Larger Implications

Friday’s trading was lack-luster. The three most popular stock indices, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Standard &Poor’s 500 Index, and the NASDAQ Composite, all moved fractionally. The movement was so small that the combined three movements only totaled 0.34%. The Wall Street Journal ran the headline “Major Indexes Eked Out a Gain…” (The WSJ is better than its competitors.)

 

My problem with this is that the Russell 3000 gained the very same 0.34%. (The Russell 3000 tracks the performance of the 3000 largest stocks, including those in the DJIA, the S&P 500, and most of the NASDAQ.) The person writing the headline at the WSJ was giving some comfort to bullish investors and those on the political left.

 

The Missed Opportunity: The Dichotomy

The WSJ also published articles on three other factoids:

1. “Supermarket giant drops Pepsi and Lays over price increases”
2. Xerox cuts workforce by 15%.
3. WSJ weekly prices of commodities, stock indices, ETFs, and currencies had only 16% of them rising.

 

The dichotomy is that while most of the left-leaning media is full of happy talk about expanding the economy, businesses are cutting back on people, locations, inventories, and some prices. One might say they are preparing for a recession, or stagflation. The bulls and bears not talking to each other, which is not a sound position for making investment decisions.

 

Stocks to Buy for Different Times

 In the WSJ weekly price chart, the fifth largest gainer was Healthcare. This is a sector heavily owned by institutions which has not seen many gains. Money-making opportunities look good considering the increasing amount of healthcare needed to be funded, independent of the cyclical economy for pharmaceuticals and health related services.

 

Once the economy bottoms Energy producing corporations will see demand rise, which should last for several years. One way to play this is through accounts + personal holdings in Berkshire Hathaway. (BRKA & BRKB will benefit from a large portfolio of petroleum stocks and ownership of operating utilities.)

 

We also serve investors who have multi-generational payments ahead of them. One of the few ways to play this is through stocks and funds invested in Africa and the Middle East. One of the classical ways to invest is to buy sectors under current price pressure. We think the Chinese region is well worth developing a long-term investment view.

 

Let’s Learn of Your Views.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Our Wishes & Perspectives - Weekly Blog # 817

Mike Lipper's Blog: Dangers “Smart Money” & Thin Markets - Weekly Blog # 816

Mike Lipper's Blog: Searching For Answers - Weekly Blog # 815

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.