Separating: Present, Renewals, & Fulfilment - Weekly Blog # 879

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Separating: Present, Renewals, & Fulfilment

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

 First Priority

Determining the motivation of the client and the account’s heirs is key to understanding the performance of most investment accounts. When asking the real investment account decision-maker about the driving motivation, it is often singular even though multiple other motivations are listed. (It often takes many discussions to reach the effective truth. Over time and changing situations the driving motivations may change.)

 

With most individuals, critical decisions are based on selected discussions with highly respected individuals, which may change over time due to changing circumstances. Most often these individual decision advisers are not revealed to the “hired hands” of the portfolio manager. All too often the unofficial managers express their opinions based on their own experience, which may have little relevance to the long-term needs of the account. These accounts are effectively managed by people known and unknown to the professional manager. Thus, the crucial job for the professional is to communicate effectively with those having meaningful influence on the account. Not an easy job.

 

The Second Motivation

The owner of the account should understand that there is a second motivation operating in practically all situations. The prime motivation of the investment manager is to continue the relationship with the present controller of the account, which includes the periodic renewal of the relationship. The relationship rests primarily on the communication skills of the manager in reaching the expected satisfaction level. This is a two-part job, where the first task is setting and updating expectations. The second task is delivering the expected return and communicating the proper expectation. This is again a two-fold job, with the first task satisfying the adjusted needs of the account in absolute return terms. The next part is where many managers fall down, the artform of selecting appropriate comparisons. This is where my biases enter. I do not believe a managed account should be compared to a list of securities selected by a manager. It should instead be compared to a fund portfolio with real expenses and diversification requirements, similar to the account itself.

 

The Most Important Motivation

Most of the money in the United States is managed directly or indirectly for “retirement needs”, which has lengthened over time. “Retirement” can include the institutional needs of academic, medical, and cultural institutions. What makes these accounts challenging is the receipt of money near term to meet future needs, which may not be well-defined in the current period.

 

Currently, the biggest hurdle in managing long-term money is the new economic/financial situation, which is different from the recent past. Most of the time change moves relatively slowly, which allows the participants time to adjust their actions to the pace of change. However, there are some brief periods of even more rapid change where it is difficult to catch up and adjust to the radical changes. I believe we have entered such a period and expect to have more difficulty predicting the future. For a period, we will likely be out of step with the fundamental changes likely to occur.

 

What is Changing?

The following elements of change surfaced last week.

• Weekly S&P sector performance: S&P Finance +2.80% vs -4.01% for S&P Tech.
• Goldman Sachs will soon cut 3-5% of its Vice Presidents.
• Schroders will lay off 200 employees to refocus and improve profit margins. They will also cut their Executive Committee by half, which is 44% family owned.
• There are $3 trillion ageing and unsold private equity deals. (Retail investors are taking risks in Private Equity that exceed public investing protections.)
• The US has not seen so much restructuring in the Federal Government, Corporations, Energy, and Retail since the Depression.
• The AAII weekly sample survey’s 6-month bullish prediction is now 19.3% vs 57.3%. (The lowest I have seen, which is often wrong at turning points)
• Global financial communities are developing new instruments that can be leveraged.
• With copper and coffee commodity prices going up, I am not surprised the Fed is holding off on lowering interest rates.
• There is probably more to the reluctance in naming a bank supervisor than we know.

 

We know that history does not repeat (exactly), but it does rhyme. There is an incomplete comparison one could make with the 1930s, but I hope it isn’t so.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Reality is Different than Economic/Financial Models - Weekly Blog # 878

Mike Lipper's Blog: Four Lessons Discussed - Weekly Blog # 877

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recognizing Change as it Happens - Weekly Blog # 876

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Reality is Different than Economic/Financial Models - Weekly Blog # 878

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Reality is Different than

Economic/Financial Models

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

Purposes of Models

Models are designed to portray complex relationships in a simple way. However, all too often models leave out contrary relationships. In so doing their utility as decision-makers is greatly lessened. Academics love models as teaching instruments, especially during time consuming classes. Rarely do the publishers of models give the odds on their exceptions. One drawback of blind use models is the lack of discussion on exceptions. To be a successful portfolio manager I believe we should consider exceptions to “normal” expectations.

 

For example, the current administration is trying to grow the US economy by creating measures to help manufacturing and housing. This might have worked well in the past but may not work well this time. Why?

 

The top 10% of the population owns almost half the assets and is responsible for an even larger portion of current spending. I believe most high spenders are not generating their gains from manufacturing and probably already own their own homes. With approximately 2/3rds of the population classified as part of the services sector, direct aid to the manufacturing sector will not make the spenders spend more.

 

Some of the big spenders are already cutting back on spending and are selling some of their higher earnings assets. In the latest American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey, only 19% are bullish vs 61% bearish for the next six-months. Some of the wealthiest families are selling some of their best performing assets. (Exor*, the family holding company for the Agnelli family, is selling 4% of Ferrari.)

*Personally owned

 

In the US and possibly other economies some sense that part of the problem lies in education at the primary level and higher. In the US I believe 40% of grade school students can’t pass a basic math test. In Estonia they are going to begin teaching AI in their high schools.

 

This week we saw attention being paid to the importance of importing selected metals. On a broader scale, people in the commodity markets are expecting 6% inflation for “Doctor” copper.

“Happy Talk” is still driving much of the media who are celebrating 2-year Treasury yields dropping below 4% (3.99%) and 30-year Treasury yields dropping to 4.5% this week.

 

None of the popular models are currently pointing to a recession, which would give a more complete total outlook. However, I remind investors that throughout history there have always been periodic recessions, usually due to excess use of debt and/or government action. We have an abundance of both currently.

 

Take Care    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Four Lessons Discussed - Weekly Blog # 877

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recognizing Change as it Happens - Weekly Blog # 876

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Rush to the 1930s - Weekly Blog # 875

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

A Rush to the 1930s - Weekly Blog # 875

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

A Rush to the 1930s

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Historic Background

The President comes from a Brooklyn Democrat real estate family background. Many of his actions are similar to FDR’s moves in the 1930s. Like FDR, he is running into opposition from the courts. As with FDR, he wants to lower the value of the dollar. FDR raised the price of the dollar by 60% for non-US citizens and residents, the impact of which contributed to a worldwide depression and was a cause of WWII.

 

In the US

The job market is cooling, and the investment market is changing. As noted by George Gatch of JP Morgan Chase “more than half of total flows into the asset management industry comes from the wealth management segment which is now driven by brokerage firms shifting their sales forces to fee earning investment advisers from formerly registered representatives. While some of these advisers will manage this money through the dictates of the firms, a number of the advisers will act more independently”. (Whether this may increase the likelihood that these assets become more or less “sticky”, we will see.)

 

Equity markets in the US have become less homogenous than in the past. For example, in last week’s trading 48% of NYSE stock prices declined, while 52% declined on the NASDAQ. The volume of trading on the NASDAQ is about 7 times that of the “big board”. (This is a bit misleading as there is more intra-dealer trading to maintain position sizes in the over-counter market.)

 

Historically, one of the least reliable predictions comes from the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey. Over the last 3 weeks bearish investors have risen to 43% from 29%, while the bulls have dropped to 33% from 43% and are now a minority.

 

While we do not use commodities as investments, we do follow their prices, which are traded in very professional markets. Of particular importance is the price of copper, which has risen recently. This echoes the increase in the ECRI industrial price index, which rose this week for a +4.97% year over year gain.

 

An Unexpected Turnaround

Long-term investors often examine the potential for a totally unexpected turnaround. I have no reason to expect this change and can think of many reasons for it being improbable. However, the implications are so large that it is intriguing.

 

The two largest economies in the world are the US and China. Many believe the US will continue to grow for the foreseeable future. I have not seen any “expert” who is bullish on China. Nevertheless, through ancient times China was one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Many Chinese work hard and are world class business and intellectual leaders. The Chinese capital markets appear to be in disarray and are suffering meaningful deflation. I recognize that the level of trust between the two world leaders makes cooperation difficult, but the potential value of cooperation for both participants is enormous. Perhaps, our grand or great grandchildren will solve this rich puzzle.       

 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: More Evidence of New Era - Weekly Blog # 874

Mike Lipper's Blog: Roundtable Discussion - Weekly Blog # 873

Mike Lipper's Blog: New World Rediscovered - Weekly Blog # 872

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Fear of Instability Can Cause Trouble - Weekly Blog # 848

 

         

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Fear of Instability Can Cause Trouble

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Instability Changes the Players

Historically, the perceived strength of allies provides comfort to all fearing future conflicts. Changes can lead to instability, including a change in leadership, an unexpected industrial and military technology change, and demographic change. Some of these changes may happen almost overnight, while others may take generations.

 

In studying what caused World War I, all too many focus exclusively on the assignation of the Archduke of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. I suggest the following causes which arose at least 50 years before the assassination on June 28, 1914.

1. The declining economic power of Austria, due to excessive spending by the government and the wealthy.
2. A population still loyal to their old national governments.
3. The unification of Germany, which came much later than the other European and Middle Eastern countries. Germany was also late establishing colonies in Africa when compared to Britain, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, and the Netherlands.
4. The evolution of shipping from wind to steam power, and the development of the land-based maneuver practiced by Stonewall Jackson.
5. The rise of the US as a global sea power during the Spanish-American War (Great White Fleet).

Applying the same type of geo-politics/economics to the US after the meaningful stock market drop that followed the decline in jobs. The following elements should be noted:

• The pundit led consensus was wrong on the President’s capabilities and many factors concerning the economy.
• The rapid fall in the quit rate points to a further decline in the employment cost indicator.
• Commodity funds are cutting copper positions.
• Fundamental changes in the structure of the US stock market: In the latest week, NASDAQ trading was 6.6x more than the NYSE.
• In July, the performance of the equal weighted S&P 500 was 3% better than the cap-weighted version. Among the stocks with positive performance for the week were: Apple*#, Coke#, and a number of insurance stocks. (* owned by personal accounts, # owned by Berkshire Hathaway)
• 77% of NASDAQ stocks declined last week, versus 66% for the “Big Board”.

As both a contrarian and someone who reads history, I believe that Mr. Buffett building his cash & equivalent pile is the most bullish view I have seen in a long time. Mr. Buffett is getting ready to make positive investments in the future, he is not building reserves. I hope all of our subscribers are preparing to be bullish, which does not mean buying right now.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Detective Work of Analysts - Weekly Blog # 847

Mike Lipper's Blog: Our Self-Appointed Mission - Weekly Blog # 846

Mike Lipper's Blog: We are Never Fully Prepared - Weekly Blog # 845

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Avoiding Many Mistakes - Weekly Blog # 834

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Avoiding Many Mistakes

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

Numbers Are Not the Answer, Questions Are

This is the season of the year when investment managers are often chosen. This is particularly true now, with US stock market leadership evolving. There is a debate between the short-term attraction of growth and fundamental long-term concerns over the global economy and political structure. We may have entered the early stage of replacing current leadership in business and in Washington. Because the future appears uncertain, group decisions through committee are more likely. (A historic lesson from military and political history is the larger the group, the less dynamic the decision.)

 

The first step in making an investment discussion is often to gather the easily available numbers. The first problem with gathering numbers is the motivation of the sources. In the investment arena, the major providers are groups who wish to publish data for direct or indirect sale and/or profit. Another source is regulators who wish to provide standards leading to evidence for lawsuits. Neither of these sources try to help others make wise investment decisions.

 

At this point in my professional life and practice, I am trying to make informed and correct investment decisions for specific users, including my family and myself. The following discussion are some of the indicia I use to ask some of the right questions.

 

Critical Questions in Search for Profitable Investments

1. Rarely the first question and more likely the last, is understanding the motivation of important individuals involved on a personal and group basis. Different answers should be expected depending on whether the mindset is one of a publicly traded investor or a sole ownership, and all gradations in between.
2. Obtain quarterly performance since inception for at least ten years, or shorter if there was a significant change of individuals or operating philosophy.
3. Understand the choice of perceived peers and their performance for the period where their critical philosophy and personnel were in place.
4. Get the percentage of time the investment occupies in each quintile. If potential investors are satisfied with mid-quintile performance, eliminate all candidates who don’t have 75% of their results in the 3^rd quintile. If the account is a significant turnaround buyer, focus on managers with 25-50% in the 4^th and 5^th quintile. (This is based on the reaction of many investors to the pain of losing, which is felt twice as much as gaining an equal amount. If the pain multiple is higher e.g. 4x, the loss tolerance level will be lower, perhaps as low as 13% or in the range of only five quarters out of 50.) If the buyer insists on avoiding problems, screen for a manager that has performance primarily in the second quintile, but no more than 25% in top quintile.)
5. Voting members of the committee, are they making choices or reaffirming choices made?
6. How important are inputs from marketing/sales and trading? Who are the top 10 brokers and top 10 marketers for the organization?
7. Recalculate the published turnover of the portfolio to include the greater of sales & purchases. (The SEC mandated measure is based on the smaller, because of their concern for “churning”. Identify the major sources of inflow and withdrawals? From the portfolio perspective, how much of sales is replacement of positions and how much stems from disappointments?
8. What are the management responsibilities of the portfolio manager and who does he/she report to? Can he describe his personal and major family portfolios?

 

Items of Interest you may have missed.

1. Daniel Henninger wrote a column in Thursday’s WSJ titled “The Counter-Revolt Begins”. He lists a number of instances where decidedly left leaning communities have passed local regulations and laws to bring back some safety to their cities and states. These include San Francisco, Los Angeles, the District of Columbia, and the states of Oregon and New York. Wealthy university donors are also insisting on changes.
2. The global financial community is consolidating as intra-industry acquisitions occur. Computershare is buying BNY Trust Company of Canada. Several top financial advisors at JP Morgan also left in a single day.
3. PGIM of Prudential is following the trend and has applied to the SEC for a new class of Exchange Traded Fund shares for their mutual funds. They are following DFA, Morgan Stanley, and Fidelity. (This may bring more money into the ETF industry. It answers one of my concerns for redeeming ETFs in thin markets.  A surge in bond and small-cap redemptions on a crisis day can be helped by accessing the open-end fund’s resources. Until Vanguard’s patent protection expired, it was the only fund group that could do this.
4. All 32 global equity market indices rose this week.
5. AAII publishes bullish, bearish, and neutral indices from a sample survey of their members market views six-months out. They show rare confusion in the retail market this week, where all three numbers were in the 32-33 range.
6. Also, Copper prices are often referred to as Dr Copper because the metal is used in so many products. Copper has been used as a type of currency in some countries with limited or expensive markets for dollars. This week’s copper prices were near an all-time high.

 

As always, I am searching for good thoughts from bright people such as you.   

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: News & Reactions - Weekly Blog # 833

Mike Lipper's Blog: Better Investment Thinking - Weekly Blog # 832

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing for the Future - Weekly Blog # 831

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.          

Worth vs Price Historically - Weekly Blog # 821

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Worth vs Price Historically

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

Merchants Needed

Despite what many believe is the oldest profession, growers and herders were the first tribes to survive. As both tribes frequently had more of their own product than necessary, they needed to exchange their excess production with members of the other tribe. Both tribes were skilled in their own production but did not fully understand the other tribe’s costs. Initially, the agreed price was in terms of quantities between the two commodities (x sheep for y bales of cotton).

 

Fairly quickly, solely mathematical terms of exchange (3x for 5y) became insufficient in terms of defining the starting quantity and conditions of transfer. The exchanging parties often did not know or trust the other party. Thus, there was a need for a middleman to determine an agreed price between buyer and seller. The middleman would necessarily be known or recognized by the would-be traders as someone who could be reasonably trusted and was capable of developing accepted terms of trade.

 

With buyers and sellers geographically separate, both in terms of distance and possibly language, the value of a somewhat trusted third party became even more important. Still further elements became essential, a recognized type of money, or later, credit.

 

Over time, the third parties evolved into merchant houses or merchant banks. When dealing across borders and cultures the participants were often happier if the money or credit exchanged was issued by a bank, especially if the bank backed by a government with a wealthy family behind it. At this point these transactions utilized money in the form of coins convertible into known quantities of precious metals.

 

Foreign Exchange

When the western world was ruled by Rome, the value was understood to represent an understood bundle of goods and services. This worked well when the government controlled the coinage. A problem arose when government expenses for war or extravagant expenses rose beyond an acceptable level of taxes paid. A conflict that exists today.

 

Governments addressed the problem by gradually debasing the currency, such as substituting copper and other base metals for precious metals. As governments did this differently, the purchasing power of their money became dissimilar to one another, both in ancient times and today.

 

Those who suffer from a liberal arts education are taught incorrectly that the English Magna Carta was forced by the public on the English king. The real cause resulted from the Barons revolting against the increased tax load on their land. The increased tax load was caused by the expense of the Crusades and the ransom paid for the release of their king who was held hostage in Europe.

 

Today our federal government is changing the rate of taxation and how it is applied to both income and estates. Since foreigners derive earnings from activities and trade in the United States, they react by reducing their exposure to the US dollar, reducing its value. This is currently an issue for an investment committee on which I sit. In looking at our portfolio and foreign expenses at the last meeting, I suggested we begin tracking the changing value of the dollar. It is also something I need to do in looking at portfolio selection.

 

A Historic Portfolio Change

(Please do not take this discussion as a recommendation, as that requires careful analysis of the needs of an account. T. Rowe Price is held in a personal account and some client accounts.)

 

The man, T. Rowe Price, started his investment counsel firm in 1937, a year of a few months of gains in a period of stagflation. Mr. Price was one of a few managers investing in growth stocks at the time. Sometime after the conclusion of WWII he became concerned that the inflationary habit had taken over management of the economy and by 1979 he was disturbed about how the US was doing. He started managing money to graduate from FDR’s New Deal, implementing a philosophy he called New ERA in a new fund concerned about government led inflation. In 1979 George Roach became his assistant, and I believe in 1997 he became the portfolio manager. He later became President of the firm. George kept with Mr. Prices’ concerns, but he allowed the rest of the firm to continue with their growth stock orientation, which produced a very commendable record.

 

Prior to December 2023

The T. Rowe Price New Era Fund was managed with extreme consciousness of inflation. This translated into investing in common stocks of companies expected to rise in the future as inflation rose by investing in assets, not earnings. Most followers of the New Era fund viewed it as a commodities fund because that is what the portfolio looked like.

 

Shinwoo Kim has been the portfolio manager for New Era since 2021 and has been with T. Rowe since 2009. He has proclaimed that commodities have been and are in a long bear market ever since he became portfolio manager, but that changed in December. On the first of December hea as portfolio manager of New Era affected a considerable change in its portfolio, returning it to Mr. Prices’ basic concerns.  

 

Kim feels the US has migrated to a world where inflation and excessive federal government spending is the principal driver of investments. After ten years he has concluded, and convinced the rest of his investment committee, that the commodity cycle is about to change. He expects future investments to benefit from cyclical earnings growth, which will produce better results than ownership in highly valued assets.

As a natural resource fund New Era has not done poorly, compounding at +2.97% compared to the average Natural Resources Fund’s +2.69% over the past ten years. I suspect this outcome was largely the result of its yield, not earnings or Price/Earnings expansion and/or P/E expansion. (The result was not measured against the changing value of the dollar.)

Economists have tagged the price of copper as Dr. Copper. As the price of copper has performed better than most economists over time. The use of copper by the electrical/electronic industries and construction activity gives its use a cyclical growth trend. Other structural changes expected to benefit the portfolio include Uranium and US shale production. The fund believes the long-term outlook for production in Marcellus/Utica as well as Permian is understated. Additional attractive areas for investment include industrial gases and pipelines. (This brings to mind Berkshire Hathaway- a position owned in our personal and managed accounts)

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: 2 Media Sins Likely to Hurt Investors - Weekly Blog # 820

Mike Lipper's Blog: “SMART MONEY” Acts Selectively - Weekly Blog # 819

Mike Lipper's Blog: Solo Messaging is Meaningless - Weekly Blog # 818

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

This Was The Week That Wasn’t - Weekly Blog # 761

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

This Was The Week That Wasn’t

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

            

 

 

In the earlier days of popular US television there was a program of satirical commentary. It was an American version of a British program with the same name, abbreviated TWTWTW.

 

Looking for leads related to writing my weekly blog I studied the four-day Thanksgiving week and concluded there really wasn’t much there. Evidently, much of the normal global trading around “turkey day” saw volume at about half its normal level.

 

Nevertheless, there were some snippets which may point to significant trends in the coming weeks. I found the following briefs of possible value in thinking about future periods:

1. The dollar index has dropped to 105 from 115 recently.
2. Taxable bond fund inflows were the largest since the week of January 8^th, 1982.
3. The 2-year treasury yield remained stable at 4.48%, while 10 and 30-year rates were 3.70% and 3.75%, respectively.
4. S&P warned that the corporate default rate could double if inflation remains high.
5. Goldman’s strategist believes the bear market would last into ’23.
6. B of A predicts 2023 gains of 25% for copper, 15-20% for gold, 12-13% for US investment grade bonds, 7-8% for US Treasuries, and 5-6% for oil.
7. My son Steve commented for Royce Partners that small-caps on average gain 12% and 16 % in even numbered years during the November-April period. (These are Presidential and Mid-term years)
8. Howard Marks reminded us of the inevitably of change. He also commented that the private equity and venture capital markets are too crowded. (Remember the losing percentage of favorites at the racetrack.)
9. China Region US registered mutual funds were the worst performers in the shortened week. (Over the weekend there were riots in the industrial and financial capital of Shanghai and elsewhere. These riots were the response to hardships caused by lockdowns to prevent COVID-19 spreading. (Apparently the Chinese vaccine is not as powerful those produced in US and Europe.)

 

Many will view this list as bearish but recognize that pundits and at least half the politicians are bullish. They believe we have seen a stock market bottom and are discounting a rising economy. It is possible they may be correct.

 

To those who have studied economic and market history it would be ironic if they were right, as it would be just a matter of time before a major recession/depression occurs. Societies often need these dislocations to initiate the kind of structural change necessary to correct for deep imbalances.

 

Please share your thoughts with me.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Trends: Deflation, Stagflation, or Asian? - Weekly Blog # 760

Mike Lipper's Blog: An Informative Week with Many Questions - Weekly Blog # 759

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are You Getting Value from Numbers? - Weekly Blog # 758

 

 

 

 Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Short or Long? - Weekly Blog # 742

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Short or Long?

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

    

 

             

A short or long recession appears to be the critical question on most economically oriented people’s minds. As is often the case with a popular question, it is the easy but wrong question. The right question is, what impact will the soon to be declared recession have on our future economy, society, and investments?

 

Historians typically find an over-riding cause for the period between expansions. The declines that have the greatest impact on future expansions are not primarily to reset price levels but to address economic imbalances in society and focus on the critical forces shaping the future.

 

When most people discuss the future, they focus on the factors producing a result pleasing to them. Currently, the popular view is that the recession will be short and shallow. Well, it might be, but it’s appropriate for thinking people to consider at least two major outcomes, and others.

I have no special competence to divine the future but feel compelled to think about the alternatives for our clients and family.

 

Short Recession

Favorable Indications

A market analytical tool that has been around for more than one hundred years requires two Dow Jones stock averages to be going in the same direction.

 

The question is whether we have already not only entered an economic recession but are demonstrating signs of a bottom.

 

The chart pattern of the Transportation Average is showing early signs of a market bottom, with the Industrial Average further behind in its chart development.

 

To me the Transportation Average is a more reliable indicator of what is happening, with the Industrial Average an indication of what investors think about the future.

 

I wonder whether the current administration, like President’s past, will declare operating railroads essential to national defense and step into what looks like a pending national strike.

 

Industrial prices lead wholesale, retail, and consumer prices. The JOC-ECRI Industrial Price Index fell -3.14% this week and is down -9.29% year over year, with Oil, Copper, and Wheat among the drivers.

 

On balance I am more impressed with the trading skills of those using NASDAQ stocks, than those limiting themselves largely to NYSE stocks. In the latest week, more shares listed on NASDAQ rose than fell, 11.4 million vs 10.2 million respectively. The opposite was the case on the NYSE, with 8.3 million rising and 11.2 million falling.  

 

Traders are demonstrating better timing than investors but not gaining as much.

 

Unfavorable Indications

Sloppy analysis uses stock prices being historically attractive, with current prices and the last reported earnings or estimates. The price/earnings ratio on this basis has dropped to the long-term average range. Usually, a sign of value is when P/Es are substantially below average.

 

Quite a few recently reported earnings were substantially below prior estimates. As bad as these reports were, I wonder whether they captured the deterioration of their businesses. I have not seen write-downs of the values of their inventories due to lower priced raw materials, the shift of customer buying practices to more essential goods, or the slower payments of accounts payable.

 

As a publishing entrepreneur I had to deal with some of the biggest financial institutions in the world., They were slow payers. Meanwhile, I had to pay our people on time, as well as our rent. I did not “factor” or borrow against our receivables as the lenders would have discounted their value, even though they all eventually paid.

 

When we investigated investing in troubled or bankrupt companies for clients, we discounted receivables and wrote down both raw materials and finished goods inventory, as well questioning the value of fixed assets. If we could find a going concern buyer for which we ascribed value to the prospects not there, we attempted to ascribe value to their hard-working and highly competent work force and good customer relationships.

 

A recent Financial Times article heralded the end of the easy to borrow money period, making acquisitions more expensive and difficult to do. Plus there will be fewer opportunities for M&A and IPOs

 

Each week The Wall Street Journal list the prices of 72 security and commodity indices, as well as currencies. In the latest week 75% went down.

 

Working View

The betting odds seem to be against a quick, short recession, but it could happen. If it does happen, I don’t think we will address the serious questions holding us back from our optimum potential.

 

Odds are, if we have a short and shallow recession, it will in time be followed by a longer and deeper recession addressing some of our problems.

 

Unaddressed Problems

1. The average US high school student ranks 37^th in international rankings in math and science.
2. The groups dictating to our medical system are tort lawyers and insurance companies, which is not conducive to producing the best healthcare for us.
3. A declining military system more interested in social goals than possessing enough power and training to deter potential aggressors.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/time-to-be-contrary-weekly-blog-741.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/switching-prime-focus-weekly-blog-739.html

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.