Showing posts with label Trading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trading. Show all posts

Sunday, February 2, 2025

More Evidence of New Era - Weekly Blog # 874

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

More Evidence of New Era

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

For some time, I have viewed US and global markets as having entered a “New Era” phase. As with any transition, until it is complete it is possible the trend will not finish and reverse to the old happier trend. The self-appointed job of this analytical observer is to regularly make observations as I see them.

 

The Rise of the Investment Manager

Independent custodians who are also not investment managers are losing influence with the owners of capital. I see assets leaving bank custodian/ investment managers and going primarily to investment managers who custody their own assets or contract out the custodian function. One clue is this week’s announcement that the head of JP Morgan Chase trading is joining an independent hedge fund. Insurance companies have been reducing their direct management of institutional equity assets and hiring independent equity managers.

 

At the World Economic Forum it was recently noted that the number of individual Trillionaires will shortly grow from one to five, if not more. This is more a function of concentration than growth in the market. Part of the problem is the growth of business investment being small to flat after the impact of inflation. One of my concerns is the anticipated AI flows going into various “sales channels” and making them more efficient, rather than increasing the number of units sold. One disturbing factor is the size of the global R&D budgets, excluding inflation, being relatively flat over the last five years.  

 

US Education a Particular Problem

Global growth is often the result of a better educated workforce. While the US has the largest and most expensive “educational” system in the world, it is not producing a workforce that measures up on the world stage. (The reason for the quotes around education is that in the US we have substituted education for schooling, which uses “social promotion” or teaching to pass the test rather than teaching students how to think logically.) Mike Bloomberg, the former Mayor of NYC, points out that only 67% of 8th graders scored at the basic or better reading level, the lowest level since 1962. What I find more distressing is that only 60% of 4th graders pass a basic math test. This is not going to help over half the US population in the “AI” world.

 

Investors are Worried

In the latest week of generally bullish projections 51.7% of the stocks trading on the NYSE went down, which was surpassed by the NASDAQ where 58.2% declined. The regularly published sample survey of the members of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) showed 41% being bullish, down from 43.4% the prior week. What may be more significant is the percentage of those being bearish rose to 34.0% from 29.4% the week earlier.

 

Walking Around Analysis

I know a number currently unemployed people of all ages with good resumes and work histories, who are having difficulty getting hiring interviews. Fewer and fewer companies are hiring. When I walk through high-end shopping malls, I find the better stores understaffed. When speaking to operating people in profit and non-profit organizations, they say they are experiencing measurable declines in operational efficiency. They point to their organizations and/or their suppliers being hollowed out by absent workers of all levels from senior management to first level people.

 

One wonders how long growth in the economy and markets can continue with a poorly educated workforce who all too frequently are absent from work. In the near future companies will have little alternative other than to use AI to compensate for this decline in productivity. The tragedy will be the millions of uneducated and unmotivated employees left on the sideline because they can’t compete. Education in America is desperately in need of a solution, hopefully a new administration claiming to be in search of excellence can deliver it.  

 

As an analyst I suspect the interim results this year will disappoint.

Please tell me if I’m wrong.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Roundtable Discussion - Weekly Blog # 873

Mike Lipper's Blog: New World Rediscovered - Weekly Blog # 872

Mike Lipper's Blog: Navigating a New Investment Landscape Amid Political and Structural Challenges - Weekly Blog # 871



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, January 19, 2025

New World Rediscovered - Weekly Blog # 872

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

New World Rediscovered

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Western Europeans Learn the World is not Flat

Mid-Eastern astronomers have known the world is not flat for thousands of years. Copernicus also knew the truth, which most Europeans learned from Columbus when he discovered the Caribbean islands in his search for trade routes to India. The real value of the discovery led to obtaining Latin American gold and silver for the Queen of Spain and her empire, which resulted in greater gains than those possible from exporting Indian tea.

 

Quite possibly, a similar realization could occur from Donald Trump’s attempt to solve US economic problems through changes in trade patterns and tariffs, which could also lead to unexpected riches.

 

Many of our blogs attempt to help long-term investors and their beneficiaries. However, a very high percentage of what the investment community labels as investment research focuses on the short-term. For example, in the latest week 17% percent of NYSE stocks traded on declining prices vs. 34% on the NASDAQ. In the latest AAII sample survey 25% were bullish vs. 41% bearish. This research may be useful for trading, but it would be meaningless in helping generate capital to pay for college costs 20 years in the future, or to help provide funding for new college dormitories or laboratories.

 

Demographic estimates ten to fifty years out are more likely to be useful than current stock prices. One statistic I might find useful is the percentage of recent graduates who make contributions to their college or the college of their spouse. Tracking the growth of people in positions of responsibility at work or in the community might also be of interest. The percentage of students taking two or three years of foreign languages vs. students taking “STEM” classes is another statistic I’d like to see.


Asking appropriate questions for the resolution you are seeking is critical to charting a course toward the desired result. Failure to do so could result in unanticipated outcomes which are not necessarily favorable to achieving the desired outcome. It is equally important that questions address the appropriate timeline for the investment. Not doing so could lead to a similarly disastrous outcome. There could of course be an unanticipated favorable outcome like Columbus’ gold and silver windfall, but those situations are rare occurrences, unlikely to be repeated very often.   

 

Closing questions for the week:

Healthcare costs are rising, can they be capped?

Can better education lead to better and cheaper healthcare?

  


 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Navigating a New Investment Landscape Amid Political and Structural Challenges - Weekly Blog # 871

Mike Lipper's Blog: Unclear Data Mostly Bearish, but Bullish Later - Weekly Blog # 870

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Different Year End Blog: Looking Forward - Weekly Blog # 869



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, April 28, 2024

Avoiding Many Mistakes - Weekly Blog # 834

 

         


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Avoiding Many Mistakes

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

Numbers Are Not the Answer, Questions Are

This is the season of the year when investment managers are often chosen. This is particularly true now, with US stock market leadership evolving. There is a debate between the short-term attraction of growth and fundamental long-term concerns over the global economy and political structure. We may have entered the early stage of replacing current leadership in business and in Washington. Because the future appears uncertain, group decisions through committee are more likely. (A historic lesson from military and political history is the larger the group, the less dynamic the decision.)

 

The first step in making an investment discussion is often to gather the easily available numbers. The first problem with gathering numbers is the motivation of the sources. In the investment arena, the major providers are groups who wish to publish data for direct or indirect sale and/or profit. Another source is regulators who wish to provide standards leading to evidence for lawsuits. Neither of these sources try to help others make wise investment decisions.

 

At this point in my professional life and practice, I am trying to make informed and correct investment decisions for specific users, including my family and myself. The following discussion are some of the indicia I use to ask some of the right questions.

 

Critical Questions in Search for Profitable Investments

  1. Rarely the first question and more likely the last, is understanding the motivation of important individuals involved on a personal and group basis. Different answers should be expected depending on whether the mindset is one of a publicly traded investor or a sole ownership, and all gradations in between.
  2. Obtain quarterly performance since inception for at least ten years, or shorter if there was a significant change of individuals or operating philosophy.
  3. Understand the choice of perceived peers and their performance for the period where their critical philosophy and personnel were in place.
  4. Get the percentage of time the investment occupies in each quintile. If potential investors are satisfied with mid-quintile performance, eliminate all candidates who don’t have 75% of their results in the 3rd quintile. If the account is a significant turnaround buyer, focus on managers with 25-50% in the 4th and 5th quintile. (This is based on the reaction of many investors to the pain of losing, which is felt twice as much as gaining an equal amount. If the pain multiple is higher e.g. 4x, the loss tolerance level will be lower, perhaps as low as 13% or in the range of only five quarters out of 50.) If the buyer insists on avoiding problems, screen for a manager that has performance primarily in the second quintile, but no more than 25% in top quintile.)
  5. Voting members of the committee, are they making choices or reaffirming choices made?
  6. How important are inputs from marketing/sales and trading? Who are the top 10 brokers and top 10 marketers for the organization?
  7. Recalculate the published turnover of the portfolio to include the greater of sales & purchases. (The SEC mandated measure is based on the smaller, because of their concern for “churning”. Identify the major sources of inflow and withdrawals? From the portfolio perspective, how much of sales is replacement of positions and how much stems from disappointments?
  8. What are the management responsibilities of the portfolio manager and who does he/she report to? Can he describe his personal and major family portfolios?

 

Items of Interest you may have missed.

  1. Daniel Henninger wrote a column in Thursday’s WSJ titled “The Counter-Revolt Begins”. He lists a number of instances where decidedly left leaning communities have passed local regulations and laws to bring back some safety to their cities and states. These include San Francisco, Los Angeles, the District of Columbia, and the states of Oregon and New York. Wealthy university donors are also insisting on changes.
  2. The global financial community is consolidating as intra-industry acquisitions occur. Computershare is buying BNY Trust Company of Canada. Several top financial advisors at JP Morgan also left in a single day.
  3. PGIM of Prudential is following the trend and has applied to the SEC for a new class of Exchange Traded Fund shares for their mutual funds. They are following DFA, Morgan Stanley, and Fidelity. (This may bring more money into the ETF industry. It answers one of my concerns for redeeming ETFs in thin markets.  A surge in bond and small-cap redemptions on a crisis day can be helped by accessing the open-end fund’s resources. Until Vanguard’s patent protection expired, it was the only fund group that could do this.
  4. All 32 global equity market indices rose this week.
  5. AAII publishes bullish, bearish, and neutral indices from a sample survey of their members market views six-months out. They show rare confusion in the retail market this week, where all three numbers were in the 32-33 range.
  6. Also, Copper prices are often referred to as Dr Copper because the metal is used in so many products. Copper has been used as a type of currency in some countries with limited or expensive markets for dollars. This week’s copper prices were near an all-time high.

 

As always, I am searching for good thoughts from bright people such as you.   

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: News & Reactions - Weekly Blog # 833

Mike Lipper's Blog: Better Investment Thinking - Weekly Blog # 832

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing for the Future - Weekly Blog # 831

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.          

Sunday, February 18, 2024

What Moves the Stock Market? - Weekly Blog # 824

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What Moves the Stock Market?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

 

         

Fearful Challenge

A common mistake many people make is confusing the credibility of spiritual leaders and markets pundits. Professional preachers proclaim their belief in what will happen in the fullness of time. Stock market pundits, who are not as bright or skilled as many religious speakers, make the mistake of being more specific about dates and price levels. At best, market prognosticators can occasionally be right about dates and/or prices, but rarely both at the same time.

 

With all their mathematics and computer skills, recorded history suggests the future should be knowable in every instance. While we have great precision as to what happened, we don’t know what caused people to do what they do. Since we don’t rigorously examine our deep emotions for each action, we may not know exactly why we bought or sold something at a particular point in time.

 

Best We Can Do

The best we can do is identify what we think we knew at a particular point in time. Investors currently have a plethora of prices and other indices available to them, but rarely a record of emotions. Furthermore, our decision-making process evolves over time, influenced by current leadership and the ideas of other people.

 

Because we only know or remember the numerical data surrounding our decisions, we attribute our decisions exclusively to numbers. I believe this is why in looking at financial history we tie our decisions exclusively to the known numbers. It is the main reason many of the numbers do not generate good predictions. I would not be surprised that the track record is only 60%-75% accurate. (This falls under the old label of “good enough for government work”.) 

 

Thoughts on the Day of the Decision

There are only about 240 days a year when most investors can execute an order. Most investors probably trade less than once per month, with institutional investors trading less than 8 days per month in their long maturity portfolios. Consequently, most investors are not active most days, with nothing spurring them to action in each portfolio. Additionally, the spur to act may occur on quite a different day than the trade, unless price is the cause. Thus, it is difficult for an outsider to identify the ultimate cause of the action.

 

What Could Have Been the Critical Fact Last Week?

  1. The DJ Transportation Index chart looks toppy.
  2. FT headline “Hedge funds stampede into cocoa futures”. (Hedge funds are trend followers and there is a history of cocoa crashes sending players into highly leveraged coffee plays.)
  3. Morgan Stanley is laying off several hundred from their wealth management division. (This division is the central reason Morgan Stanley is viewed more highly than investment banking and trading driven Goldman Sachs.)
  4. In the chart in the weekend Wall Street Journal of stock indices, commodities, currencies, and ETFs, 65% are declining.

 

Too Narrow a Focus on Inflation

Inflation is caused by an imbalance between supply and demand for an undetermined period of time. It includes the follow elements: supply or demand shocks caused by weather, accidents, government actions like tariffs and other impediments to free and/or easy trade, and partial or complete military mobilizations. (In terms of the current US situation, the federal government is the single largest contributor to inflation, followed by union management pay demands.

 

Calendar Guide

While the calendar year is already more than 10% complete, we probably have not seen the most critical announcements of the year. Considering we have a probable lame duck president, divided political parties and a split Congress, this may be the time to build a higher-than-normal cash reserve to be used to buy some sound investments for the remainder of the decade.

 

What Do You Think?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Picking Winners/Avoiding Losers - Weekly Blog # 823

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This “Bull Market” Real? - Weekly Blog # 822

Mike Lipper's Blog: Worth vs Price Historically - Weekly Blog # 821

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission. 

Sunday, December 17, 2023

Searching For Answers - Weekly Blog # 815

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Searching For Answers

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 



Neural Basis for Preferences

In one of the laboratories in the Humanities and Social Sciences Division of Caltech, a former post-doc led a paper showing a neural basis for making aesthetic preferences like qualities-contrast, hues, dynamics, and concreteness. (Kiyohito Iigaya, is now an assistant professor of neurobiology at Columbia University’s Irving Medical Center.) A similar type of pattern recognition is what successful investors use in selecting investments, such as relative price, operating free cash flow generation, management process, investment sponsorship, competitive position, and future changes in these and other qualities.

I am a senior trustee at Caltech and a member of the board of Advisors of CUIMC

 

Painters, like Picasso, were successful investors in both art and other investments. However, the tracking of investment qualities is insufficient to produce a record of continued investment success.

 

At least two additional qualities need to be tracked.

  1. Analyzing changes in the structure of the investment market, in terms of flows and after-tax profits.
  2. The perceived multiple needs of the investor.

 

The eternal job of the investor is to evaluate these and other qualities relative to each other. There is no precise ranking information on these qualities, which makes it difficult for quants to use.

 

It is with this as a background I look at elements each week. The remainder of this week’s blog is devoted to some of the highlights that guided me in making multiple investment decisions. I am interested in which factors are important to you, and whether you disagree with my reactions.

 

More Information Does Not Appear to Help

More information should reduce the number and magnitude of investment surprises. But it does not seem to help. The problem could be that the information is distributed unequally. Those with an information delivery advantage, but without sufficient capital or ownership, can have limited impact on price gaps. In accessing the situation, one difficulty may be understanding the veracity of the information at the moment of discovery. In highly speculative markets and issues, there are often more false rumors than real, actionable information. (In terms of the current market information regarding the next interest rate change, it could be wrong 6 times in a row.)

 

Banks & Brokers Cut Staff

State Street is the latest company to announce the layoff of 1500 employees. These actions do not instill near-term confidence in investors in the overall market.

 

Is Value Investing Essentially a Trade?

The fundamental principle of value investing is the current price being substantially less than the current or projected future price. In the mind of the investor this value gap is temporary, because if it is not closed there is no benefit to the purchase. Value investing is therefore a trading strategy, or a two-step move. Contrast this with investing for growth, which does not require a terminal sale except for a change in investor circumstances. This distinction has a definite impact on the timing of the purchase.

 

“Happy Talk” Motivation is Critical (Viewpoint)

Years ago, when each town had a thriving local newspaper, its publisher/CEO was a powerful person locally. Recognizing that elections create advertising demand; a lot of editorial space was devoted to newsprint.  Locally owned papers eventually disappeared and were replaced by chains, and increasingly by broadcast media. They were the beneficiaries of centrally controlled advertising revenue. The media provided much airtime to elections, with the most focus on presidential elections. In many cases, profits from presidential election-year advertising helped carry them through the other three years. Because the majority of listeners were lower income, Democratic Party spending was higher. The owners were conscious of this phenomenon, and it impacted their actions, with the bulk of the coverage/advertising focusing on economic “happy talk”. That is why “news” coverage today is more positive, and often wrong.

 

Interpreting a Signal Can Be the Opposite

The acquisition of one company by another for stock could signify that the board of the purchaser believes owning the acquired stock is better than investing in their own. An interest rate cut by the Fed could also signal a concern about the direction of the economy, or a shift in the importance of the second mandate, full employment. In other words, be careful what some wish for.

 

Personal Tax Rates Are Important

Similar to the selection of art purchases helping make security selections, foreigners can remind us of the importance of US personal tax rates. Shohei Ohtani signed a baseball contract with a gross value of $700 million. In the early part of the ten-year contract, he will be paid just $2 million per year. (He expects substantial product endorsements and other income during that period.) He will receive the other $68 million per year, without interest, when he is 50 years old. (I assume without the burden of US taxes). I wonder if he’s available as a tax consultant, as he came up with this approach.

 

“Long-Term” Different Meanings

Reliability is a characteristic many investors look for in their selection process. In the US, most investment intervals have more gaining than losing periods. The sizes of the gains are also larger than the majority of the sizes of the losses.

 

All markets move in cycles. Thus, a five-year period usually has one complete cycle and parts of another, if not two. With only 20 quarters or just 5 annual numbers, I find the number of observations too limited. The SEC in its wisdom requires mutual funds to show year by year results, overall period performance, and the best and worst quarter. Numbers nerds note that the public is given 12 slices of data. I would prefer to have quarterly data for the life of the fund, which would be 40 slices for ten years.

 

The economy has generally grown since the end of WWII, which might not continue in the future. Consequently, I am much more interested in seeing what actions, if any, were taken in negative periods. Particularly, what portfolio holdings were reduced or eliminated and how much that cost the fund in recovery periods.

 

There is one medium-sized fund group which indicates it invests for the long term, which they define as 3-5 years. We would not use this fund for most taxable investors if over that short a period it replaced almost all its starting portfolio.

 

15-Year-Olds Will Rule

At some point the 15-year-olds youths of 2021 will be part of the ruling class in many, if not most, countries. In 2021, thirty-seven countries took standardized tests in math, reading, and science. Three countries tested top three in the three subjects: Canada, Estonia, and Japan. Due in some part to the pandemic the US dropped 13 ranking spaces in the three tests, or roughly three-quarters of a year, to finish sixth on an overall basis.

 

As a grandfather and great-grandfather of 5 young ones, I am worried about the future we are leaving them. Our current educational system is the result of a deteriorating educational process that has been in decline for some time. Recently, a teacher on maternity leave at a “good school” revealed that she had decided not to return to the public school system. A real-life casualty of the dysfunctional system she worked under.

 

What scares me is the US has the most expensive educational and health systems in the world but does not lead the educational rankings in the world. A long-term oriented society that prizes excellence is necessary for world leadership. For the protection of our young people, we must on a long-term basis increase our exposure to the best minds and culture in the world.

 

Investment Conclusions

  1. Portfolios should be broken into sub portfolios based on needed investment periods and risk tolerance.
  2. The portfolio segment with an expected near-term payout should focus on trading rather than investing. Fixed income holdings should have a maturity range within the allocated payout period and only be invested in the highest quality non-US government paper. Equity should be invested in listed 2-4% yield common stocks or funds. The one exception would be Berkshire Hathaway, which is building a portfolio for the heirs of its shareholders.
  3. The next portfolio segment builds a retirement portfolio with high quality, low cash dividend payors, and no fixed income except for payment reserves.
  4. The estate portfolio segment should be invested in high quality equity modest compounders, avoiding above average yields. Use an appropriate equity strategy in an unleveraged ETF rather than a mutual fund if it makes sense, but only for one-half of your fund investments.

 

Share Your Thoughts

Do these topics and format make sense for you and how should it be improved?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Reactions from a Contrarian - Weekly Blog # 814

Mike Lipper's Blog: 3 Senior Lessons + Upsetting Parallel - Weekly Blog # 813

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Cyclical World + Consistent Results - Weekly Blog # 812

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

 

Sunday, October 2, 2022

Begin to Dollar Cost Average the Equity Process - Weekly Blog # 753

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Begin to Dollar Cost Average the Equity Process

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

    

 

 

Process vs. Point

Many prudent investors have been reducing their equity exposures for some time. They have relied on equity investing as their main tool to meet long-term goals. They have been withdrawing a portion of their investment in stocks for some time. Many have reduced their equity holdings by around 30%. This is easier to do for individuals than institutions, who cannot hold a lot of cash. Institutions move into lower volatility investments, hopefully temporarily.

 

The one thing we know about investing in stocks is that they go up and down occasionally by large amounts. After Fridays close, all three of the main US stock indices and many international stock indices had fallen to lowest prices in at least in a year.

 

There is a feeling that this is an opportunity to reinvest in various stock markets, yet there is also a well-reasoned fear of even deeper bottoms ahead.

 

Long-term conservative investors have in the past recognized that it is much easier to identify a low valuation price region than to pick a particular price re-entry point. I believe I won't be able to identify an absolute bottom point until after it has been reached and probably tested by a subsequent decline that holds above a previous low point.

 

The very best I can do is believe many markets have entered a low-price range. This range can last for an indefinite length of time based on known and unknown factors.

 

The process I will use for account responsibilities and my own accounts, is to divide the maximum equity reinvestment into small purchase buckets, typically 5% to 10% of the total to be invested. That is the easiest part.

 

The two much tougher tasks are the planned frequencies and the individual selection of advisors, funds, and individual stocks.

 

Frequency of Investing

I don't know what the future holds. Everything in life is a gamble from the time we get up in the morning, so we should have a plan. The plan is to lay out the first steps, which will likely be modified in the future.

 

For sake of argument, assume there are three planned frequencies. I will use time periods, but you could also use price levels. For illustration purposes the three frequencies of time are monthly, quarterly, and annually. This is where judgement comes into the process, when to execute into each investment bucket.

 

To my mind, investing monthly assumes the main factors determining long-term results become clear within the next several months. This prediction is largely a price prediction. I don't have confidence in my trading skills to recognize this kind of condition.

 

I believe the bear market we have recently entered will be followed by a structural economic recession. Causes of recessions are usually based on fundamental changes in people's economic and political attitudes, not statistical measures. As these have not yet been identified, I prefer a quarterly reinvestment frequency, which could last two to five years.

 

Based on history, there have been at least two periods of stagflation lasting about ten years. In this scenario, I am prepared to shift my frequency to annual investing. (Sound corporations often use five years or longer for their critical investments)

 

Because I can't accurately predict future prices, I allow them to guide me in executing buy programs. When the price of a targeted investment is 10% below my last entry point, I delay future investment until the next scheduled time. If the price of the target investment drops 25%, I need to take a fresh and probably different view.

 

Current Picture

According to some statisticians, the average bear market decline from a prior peak is 37%. (Numbers and words share the same characteristic of being frequently misleading.)

 

The following table compares Friday's closing price, its decline from the peak, and the remainder of a 37% retrenchment.

 

Index              9/30 close   %Fall from Peak   %Further

DJIA                28,725.51      -21.94%         -16.73%

S&P500               3,585.62      -25.25%         -15.72%

NASDAQ Composite    10,575.62      -33.20%          -4.34%

 

The peak for the DJIA and S&P 500 was 1/04/22. The NASDAQ Composite peak was 11/19/21.

 

For those who can tolerate volatility caused by less liquidity, NASDAQ may give a bigger but more exciting ride.

 

Possible Strategies

Believing we are entering a new market and possibly a new economic phase, the reinvestment program should focus on different thought patterns. If the existing investments are sound, the new investments should hedge a major change, with an anchor windward.

 

Consider real estate, the worst performing sector for at least a year, for a different thought pattern. They have suffered from the work at home syndrome, leaving lots of empty space in offices, city stores, and restaurants. Many real estate entrepreneurs are smart. The bet is that they will convert their space to residential or other productive use. Furthermore, current rising interest rates for mortgages will eventually top out, increasing the cash generation of sound property. This is a bottom fishing candidate, but there are others.

 

Holdings missing from many portfolios are energy securities. The absence of some institutional money may be creating bargains. Too much attention is being paid to the price of oil and other commodities. The key to figuring out energy earnings being neglected by some in the market is the volume of product sold. I am guessing an average price for oil of $50-$70 a barrel. Earnings of many oil companies will be higher than they are today as demand destruction is taking place. This is an example of extrapolation, where the market sets stock prices based on today's conditions and fails to discount future earnings that might be quite different rather than a mere extrapolation. Similar mis­pricing could lead to a good long-term hedge vehicle.

 

Question of the week: How much of your portfolio is in currently invested in unpopular stocks?

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/09/if-not-bottom-then-what-weekly-blog-752.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/08/4-5-changes-disruptions-faulty-weekly.html

 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/08/mikelippers-monday-morning-musings.html


 

 

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.