Many Quite Different Markets are in “The Market” - Weekly Blog # 855

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Many Quite Different Markets are in “The Market”

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

Main Motivations

No one invests to lose money, even if there is a clear chance of loss due to a decline in prices, inflation, or currency values impacting spending. To reduce the odds of disappointment one can diversify, which in theory reduces the risk of a total wipe out. (Except from a large meteor or similar tragedy.)

 

As the potential number of investments is so large, most people choose to narrow the list down to a manageable number. Very few people make the choice of investing in their own work, which could produce the highest lifetime return on work.

 

For the most part, diverse investments are packaged by marketing agents to make choosing easier and generate a profit for the marketer and her/his organization. To make their job easier during their limited selling time, they wrap their sales pitches with labels. The three most popular labels in the fund world are Growth, Core, and Value. Investments are not labeled by the issuer or the marketplace where traded. Although the distribution and administration processes are significant, they are governed by economics. (If one can sell the same product many times, the marketing and administration cost per sale can be smaller than the distribution/administrative cost for selling only once.)

 

The main motivation for investors, after making money, can be summed up under two categories. Excitement & Entertainment and Generating Capital/Income for future spending. Many traders interested in the first category judge the market by following the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), along with the volatility of the Nasdaq Composite Index. Serious investors attempting to earn capital and income over extended periods focus more on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500).

 

The biggest risk in owning any security is not the issuer or its traded market, but the risk created by one’s co-venturers. If a large enough number of investors panic, they can pierce a chart’s support levels and bring on more selling, which could bring on even more selling. If the stock is critical to the forward momentum of the market, the price action could end the current phase of the market.

 

Understanding Data

It is critical to understand how large-cap funds perform, because they not only have the largest earnings in the fund business, but in aggregate probably represent the largest allocation of investors’ money. (Large-Caps represent at least 80% of the general equity in stocks.) Excluding sector funds and global/international funds, large-cap funds represent 33% of assets invested in mutual funds, with growth funds accounting for $1.55 trillion, core funds $1.09 trillion and value funds $0.66 trillion. When I created fund measurement data, I found it useful to look at the totals three ways; weighted, average, and median. The resulting numbers are meaningfully different. Growth funds year-to-date to September 19th show a weighted average return of +17.79%, an average return of +14.61%, and a median return of +13.48%, for a spread of 4.31%. In the small-cap peer group the spread was only 0.54%, showing the impact of size on the results.

 

Impact of Universes

Through the end of the latest week the volume of shares traded for the year was up +12% for the NYSE and 31% for the NASDAQ. In terms of advances/declines, 69% of NYSE stocks rose while 59% rose on the NASDAQ.

 

Hunting Grounds

I was trained to look for badly performing stocks that might be big future winners. In looking at poorly performing fund sectors two sectors caught my attention, China Region and Dedicated Shorts. Both have produced five-years of loses.

 

It has also been useful to reduce commitments when a sector is changing its source of new capital. Private Equity funds are now growing in popularity with the retail crowd of advisors and their customers.

 

Conclusions:

Be careful, many investments are likely much closer to their next five-year’s highs than their five-year lows.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Implications from 2 different markets - Weekly Blog # 854

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors Focus on the Wrong Elements - Weekly Blog # 853

Mike Lipper's Blog: Lessons From Warren Buffett - Weekly Blog # 852

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Fragments Prior to Fragmentation - Blog 829

 

      

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Fragments Prior to Fragmentation

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

 

 

Historic + Military Learning

Some have said, if you scratch a good security analyst a historian will bleed. If you add in two other variables, learning from military training and exposure to the racetrack, you will understand much of my thinking. In fearing World War III, one should start with the German General Staff study of the American Civil War and the Peace efforts prior to and post WWI. Long periods of relative peace can be achieved most of the time if intelligent leaders continue to plan for economic and military hostilities.

 

Since we don’t know what the future will bring, we should study every fragment of information available and track developments that might lead to dangerous conflicts. Few peacetime leaders are equipped to be successful war leaders, and often they make war inevitable. I believe a lesson from one of the various “war colleges” is that war is another way to conduct political change. Our political leaders increasingly use an “anything goes" approach to cling to power, ignoring the vulnerabilities they are exposing for our adversaries to exploit.   

 

In retrospect, it has become increasingly clear that WWI and WWII were inevitable. The threat of nuclear war and some of our world leadership has held off WWIII, hopefully forever. Due to improvement in tactical nuclear and other weapons, there is greater risk today than in the past. We need to review all fragments as they appear and be watchful of those which could harm us.

 

Dangerous Fragments Past & Present

In the 1920s, the general urban population looked askance at criminal controlled bootlegging but enjoyed the local speakeasies. Today’s version of this attitude is the general disrespect for most members of Congress. Although they continue to support their local representatives, or for the younger set, the local ‘pusher”. We seem reluctant to reform our own process of offering debt forgiveness in the hope of gaining votes. They don’t seem to see these stimulants as bribes, much like the circuses that led to the fall of the Roman empire.  

 

Daily Stock Markets React to Central Banks Words

On Thursday, 27 % of the “Big Board” stocks declined, with 38% falling on the NASDAQ. The next day, 64% of NYSE issues fell, with 63% falling on the NASDAQ. The only difference was many traders finally believed the clues given regarding the possible number of interest rate cuts this year. (They paid no attention to the view that the next rate move by the Fed could be up.) Most of the time investors stay focused on their long-term needs and don’t react to politicians and pundits.

 

Fragmentation Becoming More Popular

On many days more stocks go up than down. This week, 21 of the 28 foreign markets Barron’s tracks rose. However, in the US only the momentum index has gained double digits over the last two months.

 

What is the Remaining Upside Left?

While it is popular for market leaders to mention their gains from the  bottom, the payoff for today’s investor is what is left? Jeremy Grantham, Chair of GMO, has generally held a bearish view but has generated good long-term performance for the funds he supervises. He mentions that if one uses the Shiller P/E, the market is in the top 1% of its history. A more significant observation is that many analysts use both P/E and profit margin, which are linked, so they are double counting. (Profits = Earnings, which is the driver of margins)

 

Today’s Parallels with WWI And WWII

Russia is in fighting a war in Eastern Europe, with Western Europe supporting the locals. The US is in a trade war with China and is constraining trade. Our opposition is getting stronger, although we are having trouble convincing people that they need to fight. This reluctance exposes our current weakness to our adversaries, giving them reason to cheer.

 

The markets generally seem to be ignoring the geopolitical hot spots accumulating around the world. There seems to be a perception that we can ignore these problems as they are occurring in some distant land. However, these problems are now surfacing closer to home and their citizens are increasingly arriving at our borders and making their way into the country. The situation is putting significant strain on resources and budgets, at a time when pet projects are already being funded in the hope of attracting the support of an expectant electorate. This spending is unsustainable in the long-term and creates additional vulnerabilities for our adversaries to exploit.  

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Collateral Rewards, Risks, & Opportunities - Weekly Blog # 828

Mike Lipper's Blog: Alternative Futures - Weekly Blog # 827

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bullish Chatter Leaves Out Useful Info - Weekly Blog # 826

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Worth vs Price Historically - Weekly Blog # 821

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Worth vs Price Historically

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

Merchants Needed

Despite what many believe is the oldest profession, growers and herders were the first tribes to survive. As both tribes frequently had more of their own product than necessary, they needed to exchange their excess production with members of the other tribe. Both tribes were skilled in their own production but did not fully understand the other tribe’s costs. Initially, the agreed price was in terms of quantities between the two commodities (x sheep for y bales of cotton).

 

Fairly quickly, solely mathematical terms of exchange (3x for 5y) became insufficient in terms of defining the starting quantity and conditions of transfer. The exchanging parties often did not know or trust the other party. Thus, there was a need for a middleman to determine an agreed price between buyer and seller. The middleman would necessarily be known or recognized by the would-be traders as someone who could be reasonably trusted and was capable of developing accepted terms of trade.

 

With buyers and sellers geographically separate, both in terms of distance and possibly language, the value of a somewhat trusted third party became even more important. Still further elements became essential, a recognized type of money, or later, credit.

 

Over time, the third parties evolved into merchant houses or merchant banks. When dealing across borders and cultures the participants were often happier if the money or credit exchanged was issued by a bank, especially if the bank backed by a government with a wealthy family behind it. At this point these transactions utilized money in the form of coins convertible into known quantities of precious metals.

 

Foreign Exchange

When the western world was ruled by Rome, the value was understood to represent an understood bundle of goods and services. This worked well when the government controlled the coinage. A problem arose when government expenses for war or extravagant expenses rose beyond an acceptable level of taxes paid. A conflict that exists today.

 

Governments addressed the problem by gradually debasing the currency, such as substituting copper and other base metals for precious metals. As governments did this differently, the purchasing power of their money became dissimilar to one another, both in ancient times and today.

 

Those who suffer from a liberal arts education are taught incorrectly that the English Magna Carta was forced by the public on the English king. The real cause resulted from the Barons revolting against the increased tax load on their land. The increased tax load was caused by the expense of the Crusades and the ransom paid for the release of their king who was held hostage in Europe.

 

Today our federal government is changing the rate of taxation and how it is applied to both income and estates. Since foreigners derive earnings from activities and trade in the United States, they react by reducing their exposure to the US dollar, reducing its value. This is currently an issue for an investment committee on which I sit. In looking at our portfolio and foreign expenses at the last meeting, I suggested we begin tracking the changing value of the dollar. It is also something I need to do in looking at portfolio selection.

 

A Historic Portfolio Change

(Please do not take this discussion as a recommendation, as that requires careful analysis of the needs of an account. T. Rowe Price is held in a personal account and some client accounts.)

 

The man, T. Rowe Price, started his investment counsel firm in 1937, a year of a few months of gains in a period of stagflation. Mr. Price was one of a few managers investing in growth stocks at the time. Sometime after the conclusion of WWII he became concerned that the inflationary habit had taken over management of the economy and by 1979 he was disturbed about how the US was doing. He started managing money to graduate from FDR’s New Deal, implementing a philosophy he called New ERA in a new fund concerned about government led inflation. In 1979 George Roach became his assistant, and I believe in 1997 he became the portfolio manager. He later became President of the firm. George kept with Mr. Prices’ concerns, but he allowed the rest of the firm to continue with their growth stock orientation, which produced a very commendable record.

 

Prior to December 2023

The T. Rowe Price New Era Fund was managed with extreme consciousness of inflation. This translated into investing in common stocks of companies expected to rise in the future as inflation rose by investing in assets, not earnings. Most followers of the New Era fund viewed it as a commodities fund because that is what the portfolio looked like.

 

Shinwoo Kim has been the portfolio manager for New Era since 2021 and has been with T. Rowe since 2009. He has proclaimed that commodities have been and are in a long bear market ever since he became portfolio manager, but that changed in December. On the first of December hea as portfolio manager of New Era affected a considerable change in its portfolio, returning it to Mr. Prices’ basic concerns.  

 

Kim feels the US has migrated to a world where inflation and excessive federal government spending is the principal driver of investments. After ten years he has concluded, and convinced the rest of his investment committee, that the commodity cycle is about to change. He expects future investments to benefit from cyclical earnings growth, which will produce better results than ownership in highly valued assets.

As a natural resource fund New Era has not done poorly, compounding at +2.97% compared to the average Natural Resources Fund’s +2.69% over the past ten years. I suspect this outcome was largely the result of its yield, not earnings or Price/Earnings expansion and/or P/E expansion. (The result was not measured against the changing value of the dollar.)

Economists have tagged the price of copper as Dr. Copper. As the price of copper has performed better than most economists over time. The use of copper by the electrical/electronic industries and construction activity gives its use a cyclical growth trend. Other structural changes expected to benefit the portfolio include Uranium and US shale production. The fund believes the long-term outlook for production in Marcellus/Utica as well as Permian is understated. Additional attractive areas for investment include industrial gases and pipelines. (This brings to mind Berkshire Hathaway- a position owned in our personal and managed accounts)

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: 2 Media Sins Likely to Hurt Investors - Weekly Blog # 820

Mike Lipper's Blog: “SMART MONEY” Acts Selectively - Weekly Blog # 819

Mike Lipper's Blog: Solo Messaging is Meaningless - Weekly Blog # 818

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.