Showing posts with label Volume. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Volume. Show all posts

Sunday, July 27, 2025

Melt Up Not Convincing - Weekly Blog # 899

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Melt Up Not Convincing

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Contrary Evidence Also Not Convincing

 

Low Transaction Volume, High Chatter

 

Short-Term Implications

 

  1. NASDAQ is breaking up. Up volume is leading, while more prices are down than up?
  2. Industrial commodity prices rose during the week, 115.8 vs 114.98 the prior week according to ECRI.
  3. AAII weekly bullish outlook is declining, 36.8%, 39.3%, and 41.4% over the last 3 weeks.
  4. WSJ weekly down prices seem strange. The worst was Natural Gas -12.71%, but the next worst was a -2.82% negative return. This suggests there were few negative prices. Natural Gas prices remained volatile, being up +7.57% the prior week.

 

Possible Longer-Term Implications

  1. Trump used construction costs for an already constructed Federal Reserve building to raise the costs of the new headquarters. Chairman Powell spotted it. Assume for the moment this was a honest mistake, it suggests that the President’s staff is lacking something. There have been similar mistakes, some of which were part of the reason the courts ruled against various executive orders.
  2. Charley Ellis’ column on David Swensen in the Financial Times listed some of the reasons for Yale’s outstanding long-term record. A long-term focus meant less liquidity was needed and analysis went beyond financial statements to management policies, and well-placed alumni which wasn’t mentioned. I tried to follow his approach.
  3. Most US Presidents have focused on managing the government and society as it was when they came into office. President Trump is the fourth president to make fundamental changes. (The others were Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and FDR.) Along with the other activists Presidents, the current occupant of The White House wishes to proscribe new ways of thinking to change our behavior. This is what our founders feared, the tyranny of the majority over the minority. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights have built in checks and balances. Consequently, I believe we are going to see more court actions for the rest of this term.

 

Implications?

I believe it’s going to be increasingly difficult to develop a long-term investment policy as we go through a period of attempted structural change.

 

What do you think?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: It May Be Early - Weekly Blog # 898

Mike Lipper's Blog: Misperceptions: Contrarian & Other Viewpoints: Majority vs Minority - Weekly Blog # 897

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations: 3rd 20%+ Gain - Stagflation - Weekly Blog # 896



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, September 22, 2024

Many Quite Different Markets are in “The Market” - Weekly Blog # 855

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Many Quite Different Markets are in “The Market”

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018




Main Motivations

No one invests to lose money, even if there is a clear chance of loss due to a decline in prices, inflation, or currency values impacting spending. To reduce the odds of disappointment one can diversify, which in theory reduces the risk of a total wipe out. (Except from a large meteor or similar tragedy.)

 

As the potential number of investments is so large, most people choose to narrow the list down to a manageable number. Very few people make the choice of investing in their own work, which could produce the highest lifetime return on work.

 

For the most part, diverse investments are packaged by marketing agents to make choosing easier and generate a profit for the marketer and her/his organization. To make their job easier during their limited selling time, they wrap their sales pitches with labels. The three most popular labels in the fund world are Growth, Core, and Value. Investments are not labeled by the issuer or the marketplace where traded. Although the distribution and administration processes are significant, they are governed by economics. (If one can sell the same product many times, the marketing and administration cost per sale can be smaller than the distribution/administrative cost for selling only once.)

 

The main motivation for investors, after making money, can be summed up under two categories. Excitement & Entertainment and Generating Capital/Income for future spending. Many traders interested in the first category judge the market by following the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), along with the volatility of the Nasdaq Composite Index. Serious investors attempting to earn capital and income over extended periods focus more on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500).

 

The biggest risk in owning any security is not the issuer or its traded market, but the risk created by one’s co-venturers. If a large enough number of investors panic, they can pierce a chart’s support levels and bring on more selling, which could bring on even more selling. If the stock is critical to the forward momentum of the market, the price action could end the current phase of the market.

 

Understanding Data

It is critical to understand how large-cap funds perform, because they not only have the largest earnings in the fund business, but in aggregate probably represent the largest allocation of investors’ money. (Large-Caps represent at least 80% of the general equity in stocks.) Excluding sector funds and global/international funds, large-cap funds represent 33% of assets invested in mutual funds, with growth funds accounting for $1.55 trillion, core funds $1.09 trillion and value funds $0.66 trillion. When I created fund measurement data, I found it useful to look at the totals three ways; weighted, average, and median. The resulting numbers are meaningfully different. Growth funds year-to-date to September 19th show a weighted average return of +17.79%, an average return of +14.61%, and a median return of +13.48%, for a spread of 4.31%. In the small-cap peer group the spread was only 0.54%, showing the impact of size on the results.

 

Impact of Universes

Through the end of the latest week the volume of shares traded for the year was up +12% for the NYSE and 31% for the NASDAQ. In terms of advances/declines, 69% of NYSE stocks rose while 59% rose on the NASDAQ.

 

Hunting Grounds

I was trained to look for badly performing stocks that might be big future winners. In looking at poorly performing fund sectors two sectors caught my attention, China Region and Dedicated Shorts. Both have produced five-years of loses.

 

It has also been useful to reduce commitments when a sector is changing its source of new capital. Private Equity funds are now growing in popularity with the retail crowd of advisors and their customers.

 

Conclusions:

Be careful, many investments are likely much closer to their next five-year’s highs than their five-year lows.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Implications from 2 different markets - Weekly Blog # 854

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investors Focus on the Wrong Elements - Weekly Blog # 853

Mike Lipper's Blog: Lessons From Warren Buffett - Weekly Blog # 852



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Saturday, November 11, 2023

How to Find the Answer - Weekly Blog # 810

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

How to Find the Answer

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 


First, recognize that one does not have the answer to the problem. In my case, and for most others, I do not know what the future holds for the world, our economy, the “market”, or my accounts and my investments. Second, search for a source of greater knowledge. Taking from the folklore of the racetrack, “smart money”, a guide to an advantaged decision.

 

The term smart money comes from the Damon Runyon era, when private bookmakers gave odds and took bets on horseraces. The odds that they quoted were the odds the bettor received if they happened to win. This was the traditional way of doing things in Great Britain and other places. In the US, various state governments saw a way to generate revenue from betting activities. They required the tracks to pay them a relatively small portion of the winning bets, alongside what the tracks themselves charged, for a combined total “take” of around 15% of the winnings.

 

Illegal bookmakers offered two services, taking bets over the phone and rather being forced to attend the track, running a banking operation by extending credit to the bettors. If the money bet by their customers was differently balanced than the money bet at the track, the bookies might not have enough customer money to meet the winners’ expected payments. To reduce this risk, the bookies evaluated their exposure late in the 30 minutes before each race. They then communicated to a trackside associate to bet enough money on the probable winner to reduce the likely payoff odds to an amount they could afford. The minute this balancing operation was activated, it became visible on the tote boards. Some would recognize what was happening and choose to join the so-called “smart money”. Riding on someone else’s thoughts sometimes pays off.

 

Applying the Smart Money Approach

Each week I scan both the volume of shares and how they are divided between rising or falling on the NYSE and NASDAQ. I pay particular attention to any meaningful difference between the two major marketplaces.

 

The media proclaimed this past week a rising market because the three major stock market indices rose. However, there were more shares sold at declining prices than at rising prices. The New York Stock Exchange gets more media attention than the NASDAQ because the dollar value of shares listed is larger than that on the NASDAQ. However, some of the volume on the NYSE is not as professionally managed as that on the NASDAQ market. (The NYSE has more individual investors and more institutions with smaller and less competent research staff). In the latest week, 70% of the NYSE declined vs 64% on the NASDAQ.

 

The smaller decline is likely due to more growth-oriented stocks trading on the NASDAQ. Also, the big market-cap energy companies trade on the “big board”. (In the week ended Thursday, mutual funds primarily invested in natural resources fell -5.62%, while growth stock funds gained +2.69% on average.

 

Accumulation or Distribution

Another attempt to find “Smart Money” is technical, market, or price analysis. The theory is that smart money acquires (buys) investments when they are cheap and distributes (sells) them when they are overpriced. Few investors openly declare what they are doing.

 

Many market participants can be labeled as either optimistic or pessimistic. For the most part optimists believe many of the problems facing us will be addressed successfully in the near-term, usually in under one year. They are buying because in part they believe that near-term earnings will rise. The pessimists don’t have confidence in the near-term, they believe there is still near-term risk at current stock price levels.

 

If one quickly divides most stocks into growth and value, there were two new elements revealed this week. The weekly report on US rail (freight) traffic fell 1.7% on a year over year basis. Seven out of ten types of freight declined for the week, with only three rising. Visits to various shops show that many items are no longer being carried.  Smaller in terms of direct economic impact but psychologically more important is Apple’s (*) announcement that they are raising trade-in prices for old devices, including Androids. They are doing this to aid sales of their own phones, while perhaps supplying the overseas market with cheaper phones, particularly India.

*Owned and managed and personal accounts

 

Lessons from History

There are many lessons from the Depression we continue today, such as the almost guaranteed death and debts of WWII. As a Marine I am very aware that the best and perhaps only way to achieve long-lasting peace is to prepare for war, which we are not.

 

A second lesson from someone who is older than the two leading candidates for the US Presidency is that their ages should not be the main reasons to approve their second chances. Their history as young and not so young men is enough to disqualify them. More important is that our political system allows them to be candidates which we should correct. There are many senior people older than the two “young seniors”, like Charlie Munger who could do a better job.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing - Weekly Blog # 809

Mike Lipper's Blog: Indicators as Future Guides - Weekly Blog # 808

Mike Lipper's Blog: Changing Steps - Weekly Blog # 807

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.