Worth vs Price Historically - Weekly Blog # 821

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Worth vs Price Historically

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

Merchants Needed

Despite what many believe is the oldest profession, growers and herders were the first tribes to survive. As both tribes frequently had more of their own product than necessary, they needed to exchange their excess production with members of the other tribe. Both tribes were skilled in their own production but did not fully understand the other tribe’s costs. Initially, the agreed price was in terms of quantities between the two commodities (x sheep for y bales of cotton).

 

Fairly quickly, solely mathematical terms of exchange (3x for 5y) became insufficient in terms of defining the starting quantity and conditions of transfer. The exchanging parties often did not know or trust the other party. Thus, there was a need for a middleman to determine an agreed price between buyer and seller. The middleman would necessarily be known or recognized by the would-be traders as someone who could be reasonably trusted and was capable of developing accepted terms of trade.

 

With buyers and sellers geographically separate, both in terms of distance and possibly language, the value of a somewhat trusted third party became even more important. Still further elements became essential, a recognized type of money, or later, credit.

 

Over time, the third parties evolved into merchant houses or merchant banks. When dealing across borders and cultures the participants were often happier if the money or credit exchanged was issued by a bank, especially if the bank backed by a government with a wealthy family behind it. At this point these transactions utilized money in the form of coins convertible into known quantities of precious metals.

 

Foreign Exchange

When the western world was ruled by Rome, the value was understood to represent an understood bundle of goods and services. This worked well when the government controlled the coinage. A problem arose when government expenses for war or extravagant expenses rose beyond an acceptable level of taxes paid. A conflict that exists today.

 

Governments addressed the problem by gradually debasing the currency, such as substituting copper and other base metals for precious metals. As governments did this differently, the purchasing power of their money became dissimilar to one another, both in ancient times and today.

 

Those who suffer from a liberal arts education are taught incorrectly that the English Magna Carta was forced by the public on the English king. The real cause resulted from the Barons revolting against the increased tax load on their land. The increased tax load was caused by the expense of the Crusades and the ransom paid for the release of their king who was held hostage in Europe.

 

Today our federal government is changing the rate of taxation and how it is applied to both income and estates. Since foreigners derive earnings from activities and trade in the United States, they react by reducing their exposure to the US dollar, reducing its value. This is currently an issue for an investment committee on which I sit. In looking at our portfolio and foreign expenses at the last meeting, I suggested we begin tracking the changing value of the dollar. It is also something I need to do in looking at portfolio selection.

 

A Historic Portfolio Change

(Please do not take this discussion as a recommendation, as that requires careful analysis of the needs of an account. T. Rowe Price is held in a personal account and some client accounts.)

 

The man, T. Rowe Price, started his investment counsel firm in 1937, a year of a few months of gains in a period of stagflation. Mr. Price was one of a few managers investing in growth stocks at the time. Sometime after the conclusion of WWII he became concerned that the inflationary habit had taken over management of the economy and by 1979 he was disturbed about how the US was doing. He started managing money to graduate from FDR’s New Deal, implementing a philosophy he called New ERA in a new fund concerned about government led inflation. In 1979 George Roach became his assistant, and I believe in 1997 he became the portfolio manager. He later became President of the firm. George kept with Mr. Prices’ concerns, but he allowed the rest of the firm to continue with their growth stock orientation, which produced a very commendable record.

 

Prior to December 2023

The T. Rowe Price New Era Fund was managed with extreme consciousness of inflation. This translated into investing in common stocks of companies expected to rise in the future as inflation rose by investing in assets, not earnings. Most followers of the New Era fund viewed it as a commodities fund because that is what the portfolio looked like.

 

Shinwoo Kim has been the portfolio manager for New Era since 2021 and has been with T. Rowe since 2009. He has proclaimed that commodities have been and are in a long bear market ever since he became portfolio manager, but that changed in December. On the first of December hea as portfolio manager of New Era affected a considerable change in its portfolio, returning it to Mr. Prices’ basic concerns.  

 

Kim feels the US has migrated to a world where inflation and excessive federal government spending is the principal driver of investments. After ten years he has concluded, and convinced the rest of his investment committee, that the commodity cycle is about to change. He expects future investments to benefit from cyclical earnings growth, which will produce better results than ownership in highly valued assets.

As a natural resource fund New Era has not done poorly, compounding at +2.97% compared to the average Natural Resources Fund’s +2.69% over the past ten years. I suspect this outcome was largely the result of its yield, not earnings or Price/Earnings expansion and/or P/E expansion. (The result was not measured against the changing value of the dollar.)

Economists have tagged the price of copper as Dr. Copper. As the price of copper has performed better than most economists over time. The use of copper by the electrical/electronic industries and construction activity gives its use a cyclical growth trend. Other structural changes expected to benefit the portfolio include Uranium and US shale production. The fund believes the long-term outlook for production in Marcellus/Utica as well as Permian is understated. Additional attractive areas for investment include industrial gases and pipelines. (This brings to mind Berkshire Hathaway- a position owned in our personal and managed accounts)

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: 2 Media Sins Likely to Hurt Investors - Weekly Blog # 820

Mike Lipper's Blog: “SMART MONEY” Acts Selectively - Weekly Blog # 819

Mike Lipper's Blog: Solo Messaging is Meaningless - Weekly Blog # 818

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Haven’t Found Bottom Yet! Investments & Military Win by Committing Reserves Successfully - Weekly Blog # 732

 

                                

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Haven’t Found Bottom Yet!

Investments & Military Win by

Committing Reserves Successfully

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Investment Success Defined 

Avoiding losses and participating in “bull markets” is the objective of my blog. To accomplish this goal, one needs to expect some losses. However, the key is to not lose too much capital, so gains are multiplied. The strategy I use builds up reserves when the prices of what my clients and I own are high compared to perceived general market risks. I allow capital reserves to build up to the point of meeting conservative cash expenditure expectations, plus a trading reserve for future investment. Years ago, insurance companies set up “valuation reserves” to capture gains above 20% to use for the next upswing. Inherent in this strategy is the assumption that there will be periodic down markets. The trick to making this a successful strategy is the proper timing and approach to committing reserves. 

 

Committing Reserves 

This is the single most difficult task, both for an investor and military leader. In each case the reserve can be wasted by committing too early, and that is why it is often committed piecemeal. For an investor it is important to identify a time and price soon before a price rise, whereas for the military it is near the point of exhaustion of the enemy’s supply chain. It is for this reason a market’s reaction to current events becomes much more important.

 

Why No Bottom Last Week 

 In theory, I should be calling a bottom for last week. We had a relief rally on Wednesday after the Fed publicly acknowledged inflation was more than transitory and committed to successfully addressing it. The next day, led by “growth stocks”, the market wiped out considerably more than the prior day’s gains, with further losses the final day of the week. 

Historically, the price level for the stock market occurs either before or after the high-volume day, when sellers feel compelled to liquidate at any price. We did not see this happen last week. I noticed at least three inputs that questions the longer-term outlook for stocks. 

 

“3 Strikes and You’re Out” 

This is what the baseball umpire yells when a batter misses the pitched ball three times. Perhaps that was the proper call for the week, with the three strikes against the Fed being their attempt to hit the inflation ball out of the park. However, they failed to see the very fast pitch delivered by the seasonally adjusted money supply. M2 grew 12.11% year-over-year, even after considering the current rate increase and three additional anticipated 50 basis point increases to 2.5%. This may be all the politically diseased Fed can do as it ignores the major cause of inflation, the stimulus (bribes) fed to the economy by the White House over the last two administrations. (I don’t know how much of the Russia-Ukraine war expenditures are in the current M2 numbers). 

Immediately following the rate rise, the major banks raised their prime rate to 4%. Remember, in theory the prime rate is reserved for the bank’s best credits and does not include much of a loss reserve. Currently, most banks are overflowing with deposits and a lack of good loans. Most commercial bank stock prices are also languishing based on their near-term outlook. If major banks require 4% on almost riskless loans, what should the investing and depositing public require from other financial institutions in the way of yield? This is the second strike against the market and the Fed. 

 The third and final strike is a curve ball ordered by the FTC and SEC. The regulatory mandates they extended way beyond prior policy practices.  If this expansion is permitted, public companies will expand less and many private companies will never be traded on US stock markets. 

To demonstrate how much the reach of these agencies has expanded. The newly appointed chair of the FTC recently announced she was examining the proposed takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk and a group of associates and lenders. The SEC simultaneously intends to examine the disclosures of ESG and compensation. (This could lead to transforming the current cyclical decline, from a bear market in progress to a secular recession/depression, following their FDR model.)  

 

A Bully Hits Someone Who is Down 

 Each week I view stock markets through the lens of mutual fund performance. Most of the time it is wise to pick an investment period that includes an up and down price market for analysis. This week I examined the latest fifty-two weeks, which includes both rising and falling markets. I found that there were only twenty categories that had positive returns out of 110 peer groups. The highest return was for the average commodity energy fund, which gained 97.33%. The smallest gain was 0.12% for dedicated short funds. The vast majority of the winners were asset heavy with a perceived marketable value. There were no intellectual property winners. Inflation is driving stock prices and the government is contributing to it, rather than addressing inflation, the biggest single tax on the financially disadvantaged. 

 

Question: Is your portfolio’s current value keeping up with inflation adjusted spending? 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/05/three-worries-april-near-term-slowdown.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/04/short-long-term-thoughts-weekly-blog-729.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/04/is-this-great-investment-era-ending.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

An Investment Dilemma with a Possible Solution - Weekly Blog # 658

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

An Investment Dilemma with a Possible Solution

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

                           

The Problem

Many of us have become addicted to the force of momentum in many aspects of our lives, including investments. We feel more secure in our judgements by going along with the crowd, particularly if we self-select the crowd, as there is an element of fear being outside the crowd. Is there something wrong with us?!

Current Situation

After record investment performance for many market indices and our own accounts in November, we believe that as owners of US stocks, not only are we bright but right. We hope the momentum will continue, for if we annualize the November gain our investment performance will generate an annual return of 100% or more. That is the problem, even if our egos question the probability of that happening.

Our Focus

Since there is so much investment momentum being celebrated by pundits and investors, subscribers don’t need any more “feel good” coverage, at least from me. Professor David Dodd hammered home the point that the entry price is the single most important factor in making a wise investment. That is the price relative to all the other factors. In a similar way, the most important lesson for betting at the racetrack is the spread between the betting odds and our perception of the future results at the finish line. In both cases there is a single underlying presumption, that on average the best company or horse may not be the best bet in terms of building capital. With that as a guiding principle, I offer up some contrarian inputs. I am not expecting to be instantly correct, but believe these views along with patience will produce sustainable capital for my investment responsibilities.

Contrarian Inputs

• The “Buffett Indicator is closing in on its former high of 187% vs its current reading of 180. (This is Warren Buffett’s most reliable indicator of a top and measures the aggregate market capitalization against GDP.) Due to the costs of the pandemic, the capacity level of the economy may be understated. It is fashionable for younger investors to discount the wisdom of Mr. Buffett, although the market has a habit of proving him right. Many doubted the wisdom of Berkshire’s private investment in Occidental Petroleum, although this week it was one of the best performing stocks, up +12.3%. (Berkshire Hathaway is a position in our financial services private fund and other accounts)
• This week’s reading of the CRB Raw Industrial Spot Price Index was up +15% year over year. The index is heavily weighted toward the price of scrap metal.  Not only in China but elsewhere, scrap is needed to produce completed metal products. (Despite Central Banks/National Governments putting a lid on government debt interest rates, I believe there is a reasonable chance of them doubling before the next US Presidential election, led by consumer purchases of both manufactured and agricultural goods.)
• Both individual and institutional investment accounts are shedding cash. (The tops of markets tend to coincide with the absence of fresh cash to keep upward momentum going.)
• There is a lot of wisdom in mutual fund investors, This may be particularly true with the existence of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) being used for shorter-term market judgements. This reinforces the belief that the bulk of money invested in mutual funds is long-term, slated for retirement and similar purposes to be used in the distant future. According to T. Rowe Price, the average 401(K) participant is investing 8% per year. (I suspect that other non-mutual fund investors are not similarly saving for their retirement and long-term needs.) 65.8% of all allocations in US mutual funds are invested in diversified equity funds, which have grown +12% vs the all equity fund return of +8.97% over the last ten years. (I do not expect diversified funds will grow at the same rate over the next ten years and can discuss that with you privately.) Mutual fund investors may have anticipated the current fall in the US dollar, which is discounting an apparently unfriendly new administration and open to better opportunities abroad. 26% of mutual fund investor assets are invested in world equity funds, which have the bulk of their investments in non-US listed companies. In addition, 17% of diversified funds are large-cap growth funds, which attribute much of their recent superior growth (+37.63% in the last 12 months) to investments in multinationals and foreign stocks. 
• Some portfolio managers are getting worried about the price of growth funds, demonstrated by the following quote from a Chinese portfolio manager in Singapore. “We believe the market is due for a meaningful correction as the pandemic worsens in the winter and fiscal stimulus may be slow and not generous. Valuation is also no longer as attractive, especially for growth stocks. We are selectively taking profits on some of our stocks and deploying the money into more decently valued stocks such as Chinese banks.”

Guidance 

I do not expect to pick the exact high in the US market, but I’m also extremely conscious that staying fully invested in well chosen funds and stocks has proven to be very beneficial in the long run. However, either due to extremely high prices, expensive stock acquisitions, or generous cash deals, accounts have somewhat involuntarily generated cash balances. Currently, my suggestion is to resist momentum by not reinvesting in the equity markets, as investors already have substantial amounts invested. When the lower-priced market almost certainly appears, it will be a good time to add to existing holdings or better investments.

Annual Market Research Visit to The Mall at Short Hills

My visit to a very high-end mall on a rainy Saturday, which later changed to a sunny day, brought out a medium-sized crowd. In some store’s, salespeople were waiting for walk-ins; however, at some high-end stores there were lines outside. There were still some vacant sites. Brooks Brothers had reopened, although it is still in bankruptcy and has some limits regarding merchandise. Shoppers at best we are carrying two medium size shopping bags. The best measure of the pulling power of brands were the three computer stores in the mall. Apple* had lines around the corner, Verizon with a smaller space had a few people waiting to be admitted, and AT&T had a large space with very few people inside. My conclusions: strong brands will have a reasonable to good Christmas season and some will scrape by on heavily discounted January sales, with a number of liquidations likely.   

* (Owned in personal accounts)

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/11/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings_29.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/11/approaching-multiple-turning-points.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/11/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings_15.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Managing for the Next Decline - Weekly Blog # 484

Note:

In order to ease indexing, I have added the blog sequence number to my weekly posts.

Introduction

All life is cyclical going from good periods to poorer periods. No one has repeatedly been able to predict the tops and bottoms on a regular basis. Unlike actuaries, those who learn the basis of analysis at the racetrack assume that they will be wrong some of the time. There are two keys to investor survival, the first is to be selective in which races to bet on. The second is to change the levels of the bet based on both the intensity of the conviction and to a lesser degree the need to preserve some wealth. At least this is how I look at the markets and manage the money for which I am responsible.

Any survey of known history identifies periods of rising and falling prices as human emotions react to changes in perceived conditions. From a portfolio management perspective, to me the odds favor a meaningful decline between now and probably the time of the next US Presidential election. The decline will be measured in terms of prices of securities and/or general economic data; e.g., Gross Domestic Product (GDP). There have been times when individual markets or economies have fallen and occasionally both at roughly the same time.

The problem is that few investors have had a good record of timing these declines. My life-long study of mutual fund performance suggests that winners in a particular phase who raise a lot of cash on the downslope are not very successful at recommitting the cash on the way up and often over long periods of time underperform those that accept the pains of declines, but in general remain largely fully invested in equities and especially in well managed equity funds. This is less true in bonds and commodities.

To attempt to answer the questions as to selectivity, weighting, timing, and turnover, I have developed the concept of Timespan investing. Thus, today I look at the future through the filters of at least four different Timespan Portfolios.

Short-Term Operational Portfolios

At the moment these are the most price sensitive portfolios because these have near-term payment responsibilities. For some non-profit institutions and active families the next several years can be particularly stressful. Not only that the odds favor some price disruptions in most securities and commodities markets, but there are the new imponderables of net federal and state tax payments. At the very same time as we may be experiencing a cyclical decline, calling for more contributions to those who are suffering, but a high likelihood that those of wealth will be paying more taxes as forgone taxable deductions will have greater impact than a decline in federal tax rates. In addition, in many states and local communities taxes will go up to fill some of the smaller grants from the federal government.

Often these short-term portfolios are made up of income-producing securities. As corporations see new opportunities to profitably invest in capital expenditures (even as they may reduce buy-backs) the rate of dividend increases may slow. Depending on the depth of the decline, markets may fear that there will be reductions in some dividends.

To balance the stock risks in these portfolios often a significant part of the money is invested in a variety of credit instruments. Historically the prices of these instruments did not move much. There is however a good chance that some of these will become much more volatile. Over the last couple of years many institutional investors with a primary background in stocks have offered to their clients new Credit funds. (In some cases to improve their yields these portfolios are leveraged with borrowed money.) One might be concerned with the impacts of a rumor on the credit worthiness of any of these instruments creating volatile prices which will surprise some holders.

To those that are funding some non-profits and/or family spending, they may be caught in a squeeze as inflation rises. I tend not to give too much credence to government produced inflation figures. For those who have borrowed on the doubling of LIBOR levels in the last year as it moves closer to the mythical 2%, it could be driving costs up for some people. Interestingly there is a real dichotomy on savings rates offered by institutions who are paying LIBOR or higher rates, while the average money market deposit rate has dropped to 0.29%.

Limits on Upside Removed

Now that the price gaps have been filled in by the recent declines, the limitation on further price appreciation has been probably eliminated. This elimination does not guaranty gains, it is just more likely to occur than recently.

Bottom line: shorter-term portfolios will require more than custodial attention.

Intermediate or Replenishment Portfolios

These are the portfolios that are meant to replenish the operating portfolio’s payments. The duration of these portfolios should be tied to the internal policies of the account. One guide may be the period that the chair of the company or investment committee is likely to be in place. From a stock market vantage point it would be wise to consider that the period should include an expected market cycle.

As I have worked with funds advising on incentive compensation, I have favored four to seven years to set the target period of a portfolio manager’s performance pay. I am particularly concerned about the use of three-year periods, because they can be one directional and not show important elements of a full cycle. Over the last fifty years in the US 37% of the time there has been a down quarter which means 63% of the time the stock market has risen and therefore there is no institution-wide experience in down markets. This may be of real significance today as there has been only 15% of the quarters in decline since the first quarter of 2007. We could well see a major rise in down quarters to bring the current 15% closer to the historical rate of 63%.

Portfolios often own both growth and cyclical stocks. Almost all companies are affected by the cyclicality of the economy and various segments. If one could count on the bouncing ball type of behavior of a cyclical market to come back to prior levels, a buy and hold strategy would work fine. This is particularly true if the dividend is maintained through the cycle. However, in some cases former performance is not repeated. For example investments in telephone companies largely dependent on physical long lines in the age of the internet are unlikely to reach their old levels of profitability. For years there has been the substitution of aluminum and plastics for steel in cars and trucks which suggests that despite what happens on the tariff front it is unlikely that many steel companies will return to their old levels of profitability and employment.

Bond Downgrades, Reality or Rumor

Without signs of great enthusiasm for stocks, any cyclicality is likely to be limited to a decline in the twenty percent range which is a difficult arena to successfully raise cash and redeploy fast enough to beat many buy and hold quality stocks. This is not true on the bond side as there has been too much money coming into the bond markets at current prices and yields. At some point rising interest rates will drive bond prices down. It is quite possible some of those who purchased their positions with leverage will be forced to sell out into an illiquid market. A credit rating drop from investment grade BAA down two levels to B increases the expected default rates for maturities of five years from 1.67% to 22.06%, In other words the rumor or the fact of downgrade could raise the possibility of losing over one-fifth of the par value of the bond.

Long-Term Aspects of the Endowment Portfolio

Our Endowment portfolio is meant to fund the expected needs of those currently alive and thus expected to live through numerous cycles. Quite properly long-term investors should be concerned about a major market decline. In the past approximately once a generation there have been a period, usually quite short, of a 50% decline. All investors at all times should be on the lookout for the bubbles that lead to theses declines. Bubbles are created by human nature when greed relegates fear to a forgotten corner of the mind. Those of us who dwell in the world of numbers will often be very premature, that is wrong, in spotting bubbles through the use of market or economic statistics. The more useful guide is to listen to the level of enthusiasm both the professionals and the public express. Some of the attributes of past bubbles are as follows:

- A new discovery that is expected to bring wealth to many.

- Apparent liquid markets, often one-sided in reality.

- Easy and cheap credit.

At the moment in terms of stocks I don’t yet see signs of a bubble which means that long-term endowment accounts should stay reasonably well invested in stocks now.

Legacy Portfolio Items

Periodically equity market prices are focused predominately on near term results which are often troubled. At the very same time these enterprises are developing not just the products and services that will be in great demand in the future, but more importantly a cadre of managers that can bring a lot of the potential to fruition. To an important degree it is like looking at young racehorses who are expected not only to have winning records but to be successful breeders. Not easy to find, but worthwhile. Currently perhaps the best returns in these searches may be found in frontier and emerging market investing. All of these opportunities will experience some turmoil during their development. One needs very skilled analysts and portfolio managers to find these opportunities and enough patience to hold them.

Questions:

What are you going to do in the next decline?

Have you been able to identify desirable Legacy investments?

__________

Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2017

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

The Art Form of Selection for a Portfolio of Funds

As has been noted on this blog and my book, MONEY WISE, which is about to go into paperback, I believe that each major investment need should have a separate set of investments. The end game for all investing is to produce capital for eventual spending. In many cases, the time frame for charitable institutions and wealthy families is infinite. Investing through mutual funds and hedge funds is not necessarily the best single way to invest, but it is far from the worst. Due to my background of studying funds for the last 50 years or so, funds are the first choice in my investment tool set.

To accomplish the goal of providing for future spending needs, one is essentially dependent on the current spending rate and the growth of capital as they pass through the filters of inflation and taxes. Like most all other investors, I am predisposed to the term “growth.” One of the ways to grow capital is to invest in growth stocks, often found in growth funds.

As someone who has probably created more fund classifications than any other individual, I recognize that turning fund classifications into investment objectives was never designed primarily to help in fund selection. The beneficiaries of classifying funds into peer groups include fund portfolio managers, independent directors of fund groups, owners of fund management organizations and the fund marketing systems. In essence, fund classification produces bragging rights. Particularly in the developed world’s competitive focus, ranking against peers becomes the title requirement for ownership of bragging rights. This is exactly where a dichotomy lies between the needs of a fund investor and the above-mentioned beneficiaries of fund classifications’ bragging rights.

To keep the reward game honest, a set of rules are needed which should be based on empirical evidence. For example, my old organization, now known as Lipper, Inc., defines a growth fund as a fund that has a price/earnings ratio greater than the S&P 500, and a three year average growth rate of sales per share that is above the same broad market indicator. Others use some variation of high price sensitivity and historic trend analysis. Note that all of these measures are backward looking because they are known and are usually not adjusted for post-period recognitions of material differences.

One of the sound arguments against using any broad market securities index is that you are paying for past successes. Remember the SEC requirement that is meant to go with any performance advertising: that past performance is no guaranty of future performance. As a matter of fact, after prolonged periods of specific progress, the mathematical pull of regression to the mean becomes overpowering. Leaders give up the performance leadership and often become laggards, while laggards become leaders. Usually at some point in a sales pitch for a fund, reliance is placed on the fund classification bragging rights mentioned above.

Extrapolation is easy, particularly if one sees no imminent signs of major reversals. Instead, I am addicted to anticipation. I think about the uncertain future. I have a preference for managers who are also searching the future to find stocks that do not represent an extrapolation of the past. This is much more difficult. In the mid- 1960’s a very good analyst caught the shift from a cyclical valuation to an expected growth valuation for a, now much smaller, company named General Motors. His market call worked for a while until it became accepted word near its cyclical peak. Think about IBM, which started life with more water in its balance sheet than assets. For many years, IBM was considered a growth company; then it became an income stock and now is a consulting services company. Imagine the problems of keeping IBM within any giving index as a predictor of future price behavior.

After a long period of declining prices, the best relative performances are held by those funds that exert a tight price discipline and/or have used cash as a significant investment. Many of the best, well known, investors have used this type of “value” oriented approach. For investment needs where the spending rate is high relative to the earnings rate, these price disciplined investments should play a major role. However for some needs (particularly in the early stages of many portfolios), the growth of the long term capital is of greater importance than the annual total return generation. Growth of capital is also a primary driver for many wealthy families, who believe the current level of capital is insufficient to meet future generational and /or philanthropical needs.

By dividing one’s resources into need-focused portfolios, one may have the best of both worlds (value + growth). Periodic rebalancing between the portfolios should be driven by the changing levels of needs. As the late Sir John Templeton would direct, changes to the individual portfolios should be made on the basis of focusing on better bargains. These bargains can be in future growth stocks or funds.

The successful selection of future growers is difficult, at best. In my case it is achieved by listening to smart managers that have different points of view based on their own research methods. As noted previously, I am willing to own funds that have different, and in some cases conflicting points of view.

Do you agree?