Is the Volatility of Data in Hiding? - Weekly Blog # 956

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Is the Volatility of Data in Hiding?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

            

 

 

Looking at the Unhelpful Data?

When stock market followers looked at stock price volatility during the summer they saw relatively low volatility. Thus, they think not much is going to happen that will cause prices to gyrate. As is often the case, they are possibly looking at significant changes in several fluctuations.

 

Below is a list of potential change agents that occurred this week:

• Changing national strategic alliances
• Over half of US stocks fell this week
• AAII sample more negative
• Iran’s plans
• Savings rates in US and China
• 3 vs 12 months

 

Strategic Alliances

Countries and societies are changing alliances, impacting their level of support in the future. This weekend, Iceland will vote on whether they should re-engage with Europe and be less reliant on the US. Similar feelings are being expressed in numerous countries, which are trying to determine the price of dependence on the US. The armaments business is likely to grow.

 

Over Half of US Stocks Declined

Fifty four percent of NYSE listed stocks and 58% of NASDAQ stocks fell this week. Only 5% of NYSE stocks and 13% of NASDAQ stocks hit a new high this week, with the NASDAQ reaching its highest price for the year. From an employment viewpoint this raises some questions. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey showed only 32.9% of participants being bullish for the next six months vs 35.5% bullish the prior week.

 

Iran’s Plans

Apparently, the Iranian leadership believe that they are winning the war and are using the low level of fighting to expand domestic counter- intelligence. (I wonder if this suggests an increase in secret subversive activity in the US and other countries?)

 

Imbalance of US and Chinese Savings Plans

According to Greg Ip in Saturday’s WSJ, the US level of savings is insufficient and is causing us to rely on increased debt levels. In China however there is too much savings, which keeps the amount of debt down and creates a problem of low import prices for many western countries. These trends reversing would be good for US companies already selling into China, like Apple*. (* Held in personal and client accounts)

 

3 vs. 12 Months

Fortune Magazine’s newest contributor is George Calhoun, an entrepreneur turned professor who also serves on board committees at the Stevens Institute of Technology, where I also serve. He raised the question of the Federal Reserve relying too much on 12-month numbers (produced by the government) vs 3-month numbers, or shorter. The markets react much faster than in even the shorter period. (I believe the new Chairman of the Fed has a somewhat similar view)

 

As usual, I would like to hear from you so I can learn.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fears On a Quiet Summer Weekend - Weekly Blog # 955

Mike Lipper's Blog: What Could Go Wrong? - Weekly Blog # 954

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are History & Economics Books Closed? - Weekly Blog # 953

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection - Weekly Blog # 920

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Tis the Season of Joy & Reflection

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

  

The Season

Around the world families and friends gather to exchange holiday wishes with those who are close to us, either in person or through electronic devices. We express feelings of goodwill, with the hope that all are happy and in good health. We often harken back to times of shared thoughts as we communicate with one another.

 

As we get older, we reflect on the progress that we and those close to us have made over time. It is remarkable how much success we have had and do not dwell on less happy periods we have passed through. Those of us who carry the investment and political bug lapse into thoughts about the unknown future, which will likely bring periods of happiness and sadness. As an addict of history, I know we will live through both types of times. My wish for all of our families and friends is that we continue to enjoy more good than bad periods, and most importantly learn from both.

 

Last Week was not of much help, or was it?

The first three trading days showed more losses than gains. The last two days generated advances that more than made up for the earlier losses. For the week there was a slight gain, leaving the three main stock market indices less than 3% from record levels. (For most of 2025 the S&P 500 traded in a relatively narrow band. Market analysts often believe this type of banded performance is the storing up of energy to either break up or down by a significant amount.) However, looking at the week as a whole, 50.8% fell on the NYSE and 60.1% fell on the NASDAQ. On the “Big Board” there were 233 new highs vs. 198 new lows, while on NASDAQ new lows were the majority, 554 new lows vs. 352 new highs. (Since the NASDAQ has risen more for the year, I believe it is a better guide to professional thinking, at least at the moment.)

 

What is more important?

All market analysis is about picking the expected period of ownership. Warren Buffet would like to never sell a stock he’d bought for Berkshire Hathaway, which is owned by us in client and personal accounts. (This may change a bit under the new CEO of Berkshire.) His approach is followed by other publicly traded family holding companies, who additionally own shares of Belgium, Canadian, French, Italian, and Swedish companies. (For the most part, all of these companies invest for the foreseeable long-term, which we try to copy.)

 

In looking at the long-term, we expect that stock prices to be cyclical, with some down periods. Most of these holding companies are buyers of stocks below their perceived long-term investment value. (We try to do the same.)

 

Applying this thinking to 2026

Having learned analysis at the New York race tracks I look for a wide gap in the odds posted, which measures the amount of money invested in each horse and the self-determined probability of each opportunity. When the gap is large it is worth a bet. Recognizing that in order to win I must overcome track fees, individual expenses, taxes, and racing luck. There is also a near certainty that on average I will be wrong (premature) on some individual bets, but right on monies bet and earned. When this logic is applied to investing in stocks and funds, I am very selective and very conscious of the investment environment. When the bulk of the crowd is betting considerable amounts of money in one direction, I don’t bet or at least bet very differently than the crowd.

 

Currently, the crowd believes stock prices are attractive and are expected to rise as they have for a number of years. However, each year that stocks rise reduces the probability of them rising in subsequent years. Considering the number of years of positive performance, the chance of a repeat is low. Especially when you consider the US election cycle, a bullish government reducing domestic constraints, Ukraine, Middle East tensions, an ambitious China, and technological challenges.

 

The one thing wrong with my outlook is the frequency of the number of declines over advances. There were some sellers in the late 1920s, one of which was my grandfather, to the benefit of his clients.

 

This may not be the time to be 100% in or out. What do you think?    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Investors Seeing a Change? Politicos Are Not - Weekly Blog # 919

Mike Lipper's Blog: On The Way To Casualties & Eventually Riches - Weekly Blog # 918

Mike Lipper's Blog: Was it the week that wasn’t? - Weekly Blog # 917

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions - Weekly Blog # 916

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Recession/Depression Risk Assumptions

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

 Future Probabilities

One intelligent betting task at the New York racetracks, where I learned basic analysis, was to guess the rough size of the gap between the betting pool odds and the probabilities. Only if the self-assessed probabilities were significantly larger than the crowd-determined payment odds, was it a sound wager. I try to apply the same approach to investing in stocks around the world. The easy part is determining the payment odds, which are based on two factors. The popularity shown in the market and guessing the quality of the current stock bulls, which is much more difficult. In general, more retail buying equals lower quality. This is not to equate brains with capital, but the amount of research done. There is an inverse correlation between the amount of media pundit space devoted to an investment and the probability of them being correct. That is not to say the pundits are dumb, they are limited by space and time and that limits their ability to handle complexity.

 

Determining probabilities often rests on the number of separate supporting elements. This is difficult because unpopular views normally have fewer supporting elements and are more complex. (If this happens then that will happen or at least improve the possibility of it happening.)

 

I have found that a search of history is useful in searching for probabilities. As there are no axiomatic rules, sometimes something will happen and sometimes it will not. The trick is to try to understand what caused the different outcomes. In dealing with history, we are lucky to have both written and geological records from around the world. From those records it is apparent there are similarities in what drives many critical trends, no matter the place or time-period.

 

Causes of Recessions

No one wishes for a recession, although we should expect one or at least the possibility of one. When a recession does occur, it is generally a surprise, and most are unprepared for it. In the beginning most don’t recognize they are experiencing a period of decreasing ability to make purchases and the ability to promptly pay debts. Hopefully, the economic community recognizes it soon after the nadir of the recession. The academic community only declares “official” notice of a recession after full recovery of lost resources.

 

In every recession I have studied, the critical realization of being in a recession occurs when the level of current earnings makes it difficult or temporarily impossible to repay what is owed on time. The squeeze on repayment is caused by an overly optimistic belief in current earnings and the absence of sufficient reserves. These conditions in turn are caused by imprudent personal, business, non-profit, and government decisions. Other causes are sloppy executions, which cause incomplete and wrong actions. Greed also drives actions without regard to consequences. There also appears to be an increase in fraud during a recession.

 

Causes of a Depression

Depressions are relatively few but longer lasting. For the most part they are caused by attempts to structurally pull the economy out of a recession. Typically, the leader of the government sees that the problems facing society are structural and immediately seeks to fix the problem.

 

In the US we have had four activist presidents who wanted to structurally change how we operate. These are Andrew Jackson, Thedore and Franklin Roosevelt, plus the current occupant of the White House. These leaders attempted to change many things but ran into opposition from the minority who used the Constitution and courts to block the changes. In addition, their actions created other problems for the country and globally after their terms.

 

Curren t Conditions

The following elements suggest there are problems ahead. My lens is primarily fixed on market analysis, not economic analysis. (This is due to belief that the market is primarily focused on the perception of future markets and not how past economic data impacts it.)

• For the past 2 weeks there have been more declining than rising stock prices on the NYSE and NASDAQ.
• For the last two weeks, the AAII sample survey shows only 32.6% and 31.6% bearish for the next 6 months.
• Tech stocks listed globally fell last week.
• Only 25% of weekly prices reported in the Saturday Wall Street Journal rose, the remaining 75% declined.
• Last week through Thursday, my old firm reported that only three mutual fund peer groups out of 104 competitive leagues showed average gains - Dedicated Short +7.80%, Health/Biotech +0.98%, and Indian Regional +0.55%.

 

My Working Wager

Between now and next Presidential election, the odds on a recession are 60%, with the odds of a depression before 2035 at 50%. (Remember the market rises about 80% of the time.)

 

Your thoughts, please.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Risks Are Rising Thru the Clouds - Weekly Blog # 915

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Inevitable Recession - Weekly Blog # 914

Mike Lipper's Blog: Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity - Weekly Blog # 913

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural - Weekly Blog # 909

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Fears

Recessions are a cyclical phenomenon, largely due to price and debt imbalances. They occur regularly within a ten-to-twenty-year period. Subsequent recoveries are usually as quick as recessions. Depressions are much rarer, leaving societies changed and altering the distribution of wealth and power.

 

Based on elapsed time the world is due a recession, which may have already started. Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab points out that the US Government tracks the profitability of both public and private companies. In both the first and second quarters of 2025 earnings declined. She believes that when data for the third quarter comes out it will be below trend. This may be different than more publicly reported GDP results because the wholesale sector is absorbing the bulk of the costs of the tariffs which foreign exporters don’t pick up.

 

There are lots of private indicators of economic business troubles. One that has been around a long time is the production of boxes, which declined. A new one to me is the trading multiples on the sale of trucking companies, which I have been told dropped in the first half of this year. This is important because it not only indicates a decline in the demand for goods, but it is a signal that they are having difficulty getting experienced drivers. Many drivers are on expiring or expired visas, demonstrating the impact of tightening regulations on many business activities.

 

Below the surface other concerns are becoming more visible. One can’t avoid a discussion of what AI (Artificial Intelligence) will do for global industry and consumption. While a lot of money and talent is being spent under this rubric, there are still no identified profits or sales from its use. In a recent study by MIT, they found a low return on AI’s use. From an overall economic viewpoint, I have not seen a study showing if AI’s replacement of the work of people benefits society.

 

With relatively small changes in price and debt levels there will be a recovery from the recession. However, every couple of generations those responsible for curing recessions believe the quickest solution is structural, which society rejects over an extended period.

 

My Fear

We have all heard that history does not repeat, but rhymes. My fear is that we are generally following a pattern like the 1920s and early 1930s, which led to the Great Depression. (You’ll recognize the term depression more from the study of psychology than economics.)

 

The US has suffered numerous recessions, most of which were in the one-two year range. For a recession to become a depression there needs a force trying to fix how society and the economy work. Unfortunately, previous commanded decisions didn’t work and prolonged the impact of the recession. Over our history we have had four presidents who have tried to make meaningful changes to our society/economy: Andrew Jackson, Teddy Rosevelt, FDR, and Trump. Through executive orders and legislation these Presidents tried to change how people lived and worked but ran into significant opposition from the courts and elements of the business community. Because of the US’s market and military power, we have an impact on what other nations do. They either resist or go along with the strategy but will be impacted either way.

 

What should Investors do?

This advice is for long-term investors looking to make returns for future generations. Traders who invest to make relatively fast returns should follow the momentum of the markets, while investors should move slowly with portions of their wealth and responsibilities.

 

Each will be subject to the cyclical behavior of the market, world economy, and changes in needs. While a trader may guess correctly regarding cyclical moves and early structural changes, an investor should wait for some understanding of the major implications of the change and be willing to be wrong before being right.

 

Whatever discussions occur today, they will likely be different a year from now. Major differences will result from views on the 2028 election.

 

Odds

These are my analog thoughts that lack the precision of digital work, but that is the way I feel very early on Sunday morning:

• The odds of a recession before the next Presidential election appear to be 65%.
• In dealing with a recession, the odds of government converting it into a depression is 50%, although it may take longer. Human nature almost guarantees future recessions and depressions due to over expansion of debt and other unsustainable commitments.

 

As usual, please let me know what you are thinking.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tactical Headlines Show Strategic Clues - Weekly Blog # 908

Mike Lipper's Blog: Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not - Weekly Blog # 907

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Melt Up Not Convincing - Weekly Blog # 899

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Melt Up Not Convincing

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Contrary Evidence Also Not Convincing

 

Low Transaction Volume, High Chatter

 

Short-Term Implications

 

1. NASDAQ is breaking up. Up volume is leading, while more prices are down than up?
2. Industrial commodity prices rose during the week, 115.8 vs 114.98 the prior week according to ECRI.
3. AAII weekly bullish outlook is declining, 36.8%, 39.3%, and 41.4% over the last 3 weeks.
4. WSJ weekly down prices seem strange. The worst was Natural Gas -12.71%, but the next worst was a -2.82% negative return. This suggests there were few negative prices. Natural Gas prices remained volatile, being up +7.57% the prior week.

 

Possible Longer-Term Implications

1. Trump used construction costs for an already constructed Federal Reserve building to raise the costs of the new headquarters. Chairman Powell spotted it. Assume for the moment this was a honest mistake, it suggests that the President’s staff is lacking something. There have been similar mistakes, some of which were part of the reason the courts ruled against various executive orders.
2. Charley Ellis’ column on David Swensen in the Financial Times listed some of the reasons for Yale’s outstanding long-term record. A long-term focus meant less liquidity was needed and analysis went beyond financial statements to management policies, and well-placed alumni which wasn’t mentioned. I tried to follow his approach.
3. Most US Presidents have focused on managing the government and society as it was when they came into office. President Trump is the fourth president to make fundamental changes. (The others were Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and FDR.) Along with the other activists Presidents, the current occupant of The White House wishes to proscribe new ways of thinking to change our behavior. This is what our founders feared, the tyranny of the majority over the minority. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights have built in checks and balances. Consequently, I believe we are going to see more court actions for the rest of this term.

 

Implications?

I believe it’s going to be increasingly difficult to develop a long-term investment policy as we go through a period of attempted structural change.

 

What do you think?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: It May Be Early - Weekly Blog # 898

Mike Lipper's Blog: Misperceptions: Contrarian & Other Viewpoints: Majority vs Minority - Weekly Blog # 897

Mike Lipper's Blog: Expectations: 3rd 20%+ Gain - Stagflation - Weekly Blog # 896

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Reality is Different than Economic/Financial Models - Weekly Blog # 878

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Reality is Different than

Economic/Financial Models

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

Purposes of Models

Models are designed to portray complex relationships in a simple way. However, all too often models leave out contrary relationships. In so doing their utility as decision-makers is greatly lessened. Academics love models as teaching instruments, especially during time consuming classes. Rarely do the publishers of models give the odds on their exceptions. One drawback of blind use models is the lack of discussion on exceptions. To be a successful portfolio manager I believe we should consider exceptions to “normal” expectations.

 

For example, the current administration is trying to grow the US economy by creating measures to help manufacturing and housing. This might have worked well in the past but may not work well this time. Why?

 

The top 10% of the population owns almost half the assets and is responsible for an even larger portion of current spending. I believe most high spenders are not generating their gains from manufacturing and probably already own their own homes. With approximately 2/3rds of the population classified as part of the services sector, direct aid to the manufacturing sector will not make the spenders spend more.

 

Some of the big spenders are already cutting back on spending and are selling some of their higher earnings assets. In the latest American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey, only 19% are bullish vs 61% bearish for the next six-months. Some of the wealthiest families are selling some of their best performing assets. (Exor*, the family holding company for the Agnelli family, is selling 4% of Ferrari.)

*Personally owned

 

In the US and possibly other economies some sense that part of the problem lies in education at the primary level and higher. In the US I believe 40% of grade school students can’t pass a basic math test. In Estonia they are going to begin teaching AI in their high schools.

 

This week we saw attention being paid to the importance of importing selected metals. On a broader scale, people in the commodity markets are expecting 6% inflation for “Doctor” copper.

“Happy Talk” is still driving much of the media who are celebrating 2-year Treasury yields dropping below 4% (3.99%) and 30-year Treasury yields dropping to 4.5% this week.

 

None of the popular models are currently pointing to a recession, which would give a more complete total outlook. However, I remind investors that throughout history there have always been periodic recessions, usually due to excess use of debt and/or government action. We have an abundance of both currently.

 

Take Care    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Four Lessons Discussed - Weekly Blog # 877

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recognizing Change as it Happens - Weekly Blog # 876

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Rush to the 1930s - Weekly Blog # 875

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Four Lessons Discussed - Weekly Blog # 877

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Four Lessons Discussed

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 Farmers’ Experience Led to the Crash

Is 1930 a preview of 202x? To set the stage, the 1920s were a period of transition and economic expansion. America and most of the industrial world enjoyed meaningful economic progress spurred on by the encouragement of increased debt. Governments, companies, individuals, and farmers used the resources of others to leverage their assets with increasing debt, fulfilling their perceived needs at ever increasing rates. The lessons of the 50-years before WWI were distant memories.

 

Due to WWI mobilization, women entered the workforce in increased numbers. The returning military found farm work too hard and too poorly paid on the farms. Financial communities, which had extensive experience with debt and leverage, found vast new markets for the financial skills of banks and others. Thus, the missing manpower was replaced by expensive machines and chemicals, which led to farmers owning leveraged machines and farms.

 

The age-old problem with leverage is the cost-price spread abruptly narrows. In a world becoming increasingly more global, international trade becomes the fulcrum-point of the fluctuating cost-price spread. To protect those in the middle from price swings, tariffs and other restrictive measures were introduced.

The US consumer desired ever-increasing amounts of food, with much of it imported from lower cost countries. To protect home-grown crops, additional costs and restrictions were placed on imports. Exporting countries fought back by lowering their prices to a point where domestically produced products could not compete effectively. Consequently, domestic farmers got their elected politicians to impose tariffs on imports, like the Smoot-Hawley tariff that President Hoover was reluctant to do. (It was repealed three years later) Other nations reacted by imposing their own tariffs on US exports, which was a contributing cause for WWII. 

 

What will be the impact of the proposed Reciprocal Tariffs being proposed? Despite what is being said, it seems unlikely consumers will avoid some or more of the cost.

 

Learning from Uncle Warren

This weekend Berkshire Hathaway (*) published its results for the 4th quarter and all of 2024, along with a well thought out discussion. The company has four main revenue sources for the heirs of its shareholders. Berkshire has total or partial ownership of over 180 private companies and a smaller but better-known portfolio of quite large publicly traded companies. They also have an increasingly large portfolio of short-term US Treasuries, which increase in value as interest rates rise.

 

The difference between what their insurance companies charge and their eventual payout is called a “float”. In the most current period all earnings asset categories rose, except for the holdings of the publicly owned securities which declined because of sales. The total portfolio rose and is selling very close to its all-time high. Considering the company announced it is being managed for the benefit of today’s shareholder heirs; it is extremely appropriate to occasionally reduce its near-term market risks. (It is worth noting, the remaining two lessons in this blog suggest caution is warranted.)

(*) Owned in Personal and Client accounts

 

The Leading Mutual Funds Suggest US Risk

Each week I look at over 1500 SEC registered mutual funds, as well as many more in the global world. Usually, a number of different drivers describe the leaders of the week.

 

The list below shows the investment objective assigned to the fund:

Precious Metals Equity           21.04%

Commodities Precious Metals      11.86

International Large-Cap Value     8.60

International Mid-Cap Value       8.54

Commodities Base Metals           8.34

International Large-Cap Growth    8.24

Commodities Agriculture           8.15

Warren Buffet, among others, is concerned that the US government may cause the value of the US dollar to drop.

The year-to-date winners are not investing in the US.

 

“Debt Has Always Been the Ruin of Great Powers. Is the U.S. Next?”

 Above is the title of Niall Ferguson’s article in Saturday’s Wall Street Journal where he introduces Ferguson’s Law, which was crafted in 1767. The law states “that any great power that spends more on debt service than on defense risks ceasing to be a great power.” According to the author, debt service includes repayment of debt and defense includes all costs to maintain the military. The US has just passed this milestone, but it would take an extended period to fundamentally break the Ferguson Law.

 

Working Conclusion

Be careful and share your thoughts, particularly if you disagree.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recognizing Change as it Happens - Weekly Blog # 876

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Rush to the 1930s - Weekly Blog # 875

Mike Lipper's Blog: More Evidence of New Era - Weekly Blog # 874

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk - Weekly Blog # 862

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

When Traveling We Often Don’t Know We Are Lost

As a portfolio manager for multi-generational accounts, it is critical to continually focus on the long-term funding needs of accounts, particularly when I am no longer around. In effect we are on a long march, which was part of my training as a USMC officer. (Most of our subscribers will read this blog on the 249th Birthday of The Corps) Rarely does a long march go in a straight line and each turn could be a minor change in direction. Alternatively, it could be a significant change in direction to avoid future danger. At some point a good Marine will recognize that we have passed a critical inflection point.

 

Our fellow investment marchers should be aware of a meaningful change in direction, speed of travel, and a different set of tactical moves. As an officer, it is my duty to consider changes.

 

Recent chatter from various investment pundits suggests there are various “Trump Trades”. Without making a judgement on each suggestion, I am willing to bet a year from now at least half those trades will not have worked out.

 

These trades are based on the 45th President’s actions and campaign comments. I believe no one knows what the 47th President will be able to get accomplished in his first year. We may think we know what he wants to do, but the world has changed both domestically and internationally and he doesn’t know for sure. Based on history, I am concerned about how Congress will follow direction. In many ways, both Chambers of the two major parties are split internally.  Just look at the number of announced caucuses and the potential number of informal voting blocks. Republican majorities in both chambers are likely be under 10 members. Furthermore, the incoming President did not do much to get many members elected. There are a number of Senators who see themselves sitting in The Oval office after the 2028 elections.

 

My portfolio management suggestions for protecting portfolio manager’s jobs are the following:

1. Divide the Trump Trades in half and hold one half for the next year.
2. With the second half, subdivide into twelve equal groups and sell one group each month for the next year.
3. Put the freed-up cash in an equal-weighted S&P 500 index fund if you must be invested, otherwise put the cash in a money market fund.

The above tactic is for short exposure but does not address the real problem.

 

Lack of Competent Leadership is the Problem

As a society Americans have become defensive about their own worth and their jobs. We seek to acquire the credentials that qualified us at some point in time for a particular job, “guaranteeing” that job and income. Once we have the credentials, we no longer need to compete. The longer the elapsed time from when we “earned” the credentials, the less talents we acquire. To offset this deficiency, we lean more on support staff. During WWII it required eight support people for every fighting man (mostly men).

 

This is true not only in the military, but also in medicine, government and schooling. (Note, I didn’t say education.) The larger the staff, the more bureaucratic the control systems get. (A classic example is the Ukrainian fighting people vs the Russian Army.) In general, the more people involved the less efficient the group gets and the longer it takes between promotions.

 

Our so-called educational system (school and university) has molded our workforce since the 1920s. The Communist Party thought that if they could control New York and other school systems they could impact the government, aided by the Depression. The key for union teachers was protecting their jobs by teaching-to-pass exams, both for teachers and students. They were not taught how to think. This strategy was remarkably successful.

 

These teachers trained many of the senior teachers who trained the senior college and university students of today, which explains the political efforts of the majority of teachers today. Trustees and Deans don’t control most of the critical choices of their schools. The faculty senate are the main decision makers, run on a seniority basis.

 

These are the people who are teaching the leaders of today and tomorrow in government, medicine, and business. They tend to favor large organizations, despite most progress in society originating from smaller groups.

 

Inflation is not the Problem

Inflation is society’s way of dealing with imbalances between current supply and demand. Attempts by a top-down government to control the urges of people to balance supply and demand are not useful. Every attempt to control these forces has enlarged grey and black markets, often summoned in regulated and expensive markets. Most supply shortages are due to government regulation for the benefit of friends of the government.

 

In Conclusion

If we have entered a new cycle, we may see a very different set of trends that we will need to understand and master. Any thoughts on how to manage long-term portfolios?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

Mike Lipper's Blog: Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stress Unfelt by the “Bulls”, Yet !! - Weekly Blog # 859

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Worth vs Price Historically - Weekly Blog # 821

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Worth vs Price Historically

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

Merchants Needed

Despite what many believe is the oldest profession, growers and herders were the first tribes to survive. As both tribes frequently had more of their own product than necessary, they needed to exchange their excess production with members of the other tribe. Both tribes were skilled in their own production but did not fully understand the other tribe’s costs. Initially, the agreed price was in terms of quantities between the two commodities (x sheep for y bales of cotton).

 

Fairly quickly, solely mathematical terms of exchange (3x for 5y) became insufficient in terms of defining the starting quantity and conditions of transfer. The exchanging parties often did not know or trust the other party. Thus, there was a need for a middleman to determine an agreed price between buyer and seller. The middleman would necessarily be known or recognized by the would-be traders as someone who could be reasonably trusted and was capable of developing accepted terms of trade.

 

With buyers and sellers geographically separate, both in terms of distance and possibly language, the value of a somewhat trusted third party became even more important. Still further elements became essential, a recognized type of money, or later, credit.

 

Over time, the third parties evolved into merchant houses or merchant banks. When dealing across borders and cultures the participants were often happier if the money or credit exchanged was issued by a bank, especially if the bank backed by a government with a wealthy family behind it. At this point these transactions utilized money in the form of coins convertible into known quantities of precious metals.

 

Foreign Exchange

When the western world was ruled by Rome, the value was understood to represent an understood bundle of goods and services. This worked well when the government controlled the coinage. A problem arose when government expenses for war or extravagant expenses rose beyond an acceptable level of taxes paid. A conflict that exists today.

 

Governments addressed the problem by gradually debasing the currency, such as substituting copper and other base metals for precious metals. As governments did this differently, the purchasing power of their money became dissimilar to one another, both in ancient times and today.

 

Those who suffer from a liberal arts education are taught incorrectly that the English Magna Carta was forced by the public on the English king. The real cause resulted from the Barons revolting against the increased tax load on their land. The increased tax load was caused by the expense of the Crusades and the ransom paid for the release of their king who was held hostage in Europe.

 

Today our federal government is changing the rate of taxation and how it is applied to both income and estates. Since foreigners derive earnings from activities and trade in the United States, they react by reducing their exposure to the US dollar, reducing its value. This is currently an issue for an investment committee on which I sit. In looking at our portfolio and foreign expenses at the last meeting, I suggested we begin tracking the changing value of the dollar. It is also something I need to do in looking at portfolio selection.

 

A Historic Portfolio Change

(Please do not take this discussion as a recommendation, as that requires careful analysis of the needs of an account. T. Rowe Price is held in a personal account and some client accounts.)

 

The man, T. Rowe Price, started his investment counsel firm in 1937, a year of a few months of gains in a period of stagflation. Mr. Price was one of a few managers investing in growth stocks at the time. Sometime after the conclusion of WWII he became concerned that the inflationary habit had taken over management of the economy and by 1979 he was disturbed about how the US was doing. He started managing money to graduate from FDR’s New Deal, implementing a philosophy he called New ERA in a new fund concerned about government led inflation. In 1979 George Roach became his assistant, and I believe in 1997 he became the portfolio manager. He later became President of the firm. George kept with Mr. Prices’ concerns, but he allowed the rest of the firm to continue with their growth stock orientation, which produced a very commendable record.

 

Prior to December 2023

The T. Rowe Price New Era Fund was managed with extreme consciousness of inflation. This translated into investing in common stocks of companies expected to rise in the future as inflation rose by investing in assets, not earnings. Most followers of the New Era fund viewed it as a commodities fund because that is what the portfolio looked like.

 

Shinwoo Kim has been the portfolio manager for New Era since 2021 and has been with T. Rowe since 2009. He has proclaimed that commodities have been and are in a long bear market ever since he became portfolio manager, but that changed in December. On the first of December hea as portfolio manager of New Era affected a considerable change in its portfolio, returning it to Mr. Prices’ basic concerns.  

 

Kim feels the US has migrated to a world where inflation and excessive federal government spending is the principal driver of investments. After ten years he has concluded, and convinced the rest of his investment committee, that the commodity cycle is about to change. He expects future investments to benefit from cyclical earnings growth, which will produce better results than ownership in highly valued assets.

As a natural resource fund New Era has not done poorly, compounding at +2.97% compared to the average Natural Resources Fund’s +2.69% over the past ten years. I suspect this outcome was largely the result of its yield, not earnings or Price/Earnings expansion and/or P/E expansion. (The result was not measured against the changing value of the dollar.)

Economists have tagged the price of copper as Dr. Copper. As the price of copper has performed better than most economists over time. The use of copper by the electrical/electronic industries and construction activity gives its use a cyclical growth trend. Other structural changes expected to benefit the portfolio include Uranium and US shale production. The fund believes the long-term outlook for production in Marcellus/Utica as well as Permian is understated. Additional attractive areas for investment include industrial gases and pipelines. (This brings to mind Berkshire Hathaway- a position owned in our personal and managed accounts)

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: 2 Media Sins Likely to Hurt Investors - Weekly Blog # 820

Mike Lipper's Blog: “SMART MONEY” Acts Selectively - Weekly Blog # 819

Mike Lipper's Blog: Solo Messaging is Meaningless - Weekly Blog # 818

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.