Is the Volatility of Data in Hiding? - Weekly Blog # 956

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Is the Volatility of Data in Hiding?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

            

 

 

Looking at the Unhelpful Data?

When stock market followers looked at stock price volatility during the summer they saw relatively low volatility. Thus, they think not much is going to happen that will cause prices to gyrate. As is often the case, they are possibly looking at significant changes in several fluctuations.

 

Below is a list of potential change agents that occurred this week:

• Changing national strategic alliances
• Over half of US stocks fell this week
• AAII sample more negative
• Iran’s plans
• Savings rates in US and China
• 3 vs 12 months

 

Strategic Alliances

Countries and societies are changing alliances, impacting their level of support in the future. This weekend, Iceland will vote on whether they should re-engage with Europe and be less reliant on the US. Similar feelings are being expressed in numerous countries, which are trying to determine the price of dependence on the US. The armaments business is likely to grow.

 

Over Half of US Stocks Declined

Fifty four percent of NYSE listed stocks and 58% of NASDAQ stocks fell this week. Only 5% of NYSE stocks and 13% of NASDAQ stocks hit a new high this week, with the NASDAQ reaching its highest price for the year. From an employment viewpoint this raises some questions. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) survey showed only 32.9% of participants being bullish for the next six months vs 35.5% bullish the prior week.

 

Iran’s Plans

Apparently, the Iranian leadership believe that they are winning the war and are using the low level of fighting to expand domestic counter- intelligence. (I wonder if this suggests an increase in secret subversive activity in the US and other countries?)

 

Imbalance of US and Chinese Savings Plans

According to Greg Ip in Saturday’s WSJ, the US level of savings is insufficient and is causing us to rely on increased debt levels. In China however there is too much savings, which keeps the amount of debt down and creates a problem of low import prices for many western countries. These trends reversing would be good for US companies already selling into China, like Apple*. (* Held in personal and client accounts)

 

3 vs. 12 Months

Fortune Magazine’s newest contributor is George Calhoun, an entrepreneur turned professor who also serves on board committees at the Stevens Institute of Technology, where I also serve. He raised the question of the Federal Reserve relying too much on 12-month numbers (produced by the government) vs 3-month numbers, or shorter. The markets react much faster than in even the shorter period. (I believe the new Chairman of the Fed has a somewhat similar view)

 

As usual, I would like to hear from you so I can learn.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fears On a Quiet Summer Weekend - Weekly Blog # 955

Mike Lipper's Blog: What Could Go Wrong? - Weekly Blog # 954

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are History & Economics Books Closed? - Weekly Blog # 953

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Significant Messages: Warren Buffett to Step Down by End of Year, Other Berkshire Insights, and Tariffs won't deliver - Weekly Blog # 887

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Significant Messages: Warren Buffett to

Step Down by End of Year, Other Berkshire

Insights, and Tariffs won't deliver

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

You have probably already heard that Warren Buffett will step down as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway by the end of the year. Warren announced this to thunderous applause at Berkshire's annual meeting on Saturday afternoon. I am not surprised. At the meeting, which is the first we have not attended in many years, his answers to many questions were more statesman like, recognizing the scope of problems facing both the country and the rest of the globe. He referred to his Father's only political defeat as a Republican Congressman and subsequent re-election. Greg Able spoke purposely, answering an increasing number of questions. He will succeed Warren as CEO.

 

The following brief comments were delivered at the meeting largely in chronological order.

1. Berkshire expects the relationship with Japanese trading companies to likely lead to more Japanese acquisitions, probably in Yen.
2. Berkshire was in discussion for a $10 billion deal recently. Buffett indicated that he thought with Abel as CEO larger deals are likely, with more communication between the units.
3. Currently, the companies are not using AI for Real Estate and they are behind in using it for GEICO.
4. There is a global push for weaker currencies, which is a negative.
5. Life Insurance is different from the Property/Casualty insurance Private Equity is using.
6. Berkshire's stock price has fallen 50% three different times.
7. In the latest quarter, the prices of 21 subsidiaries rose and 29 declined.
8. There were no repurchases of stock.
9. Warren pays more attention to balance sheets than income statements. He is particularly interested in generation of free cash flow. He also believes quality starts from the top. There was quite a discussion about utilities, coal, and fires. The various states and political interests need to decide what they will authorize.

 

Tariffs Are Not the Answer

Far too many people believe that imposing Tariffs on various items of world trade will solve the problems of individual countries. George Calhoun, a Director at the Stevens Institute of Technology and a contributor to Forbes Magazine, raises critical questions in two articles in Forbes. (George and I serve on a board committee at the Stevens Institute.) For brevity purposes I will briefly review the first part of his second article:

 

Will higher tariffs cause inflation?

Prices will rise.

 

Alternative view:

Currency shifts neutralize price increases

 

Mitigating factors: Caveats, Fudges, & Assumptions'

There are at least 14 various measures of annualized inflation.

 

Is it really inflation?

"High prices are not the same as inflation"

There is confusion between the rate of change and the level of prices. (I may include the perception that there is no change in the quality of product or service and time of delivery.)

 

Tariffs affect only a small portion of the "The Consumer's Basket"

(Does substitution change the value of the product?)

 

(I am happy to send the second half of George's article to any subscriber.)

 

The Trump Angle

From the very first time the President introduced the use of tariffs to correct the imbalance of world trade, I believed he was doing it to force negotiations. It is already clear he will change the size of barriers, due to the manipulation of currencies. (See currency shifts above.)

Only the most senior officers can deal with these types of items.

 

 

Question: As usual I would like to hear your views.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Contrarian Starting to Worry - Weekly Blog # 886

Mike Lipper's Blog: Generally Good Holy Week + Future Clues - Weekly Blog # 885

Mike Lipper's Blog: An Uneasy Week with Long Concerns - Weekly Blog # 884

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Better Investment Thinking - Weekly Blog # 832

          

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Better Investment Thinking

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

 

The late and great Charlie Munger gave Warren Buffett his greatest compliment when he called him a “thinking machine”. His compliment implies that Warren is always thinking and trying to improve his investment process. In last week’s post-script at the end of the blog I introduced the concept of needing to focus on the process of selling. Early this week I had a conversation with one of the more perceptive members of a monthly investment discussion group. He was concerned that they hardly ever discuss the process of selling.

 

Selling is often prompted by the need to raise cash or the need to free up cash for reinvestment. Currently, we have quite possibly entered a period where it would be prudent to develop a meaningful cash reserve for later equity reinvestment. Admittedly, it runs the risk of not fully taking advantage of the rising stock market.  It is with that thought in mind that I am introducing the thinking of Professor George M. Calhoun, with some concern as to the structural risk it might expose.

 

George’s views have been shaped by the following experiences.

• For 25 years George worked for various tech companies.
• He is a Professor at The Stevens Institute of Technology, where I am one of the trustees.
• At Stevens, George supervised the development of the Hanlon Financial Center, a live trading room.
• He won a National Science Foundation award for creating the Center for Research Toward Advancing Financial Technologies (CRAFT).
• George is a regular contributor to Forbes.

George Calhoun has written extensively on the causes of inflation, in discussions on: Dangers created by Money Market Funds, Cash Shortages, Recession Signal, Dry Powder, and Contrarian Indicator, parts of which are included in the link to the article below.

 

 

Collateral Damage From Fed Policy (3) – Money Market Funds, A ‘Powder Keg’? (forbes.com)

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing for the Future - Weekly Blog # 831

Mike Lipper's Blog: American Voters Win & Lose - Weekly Blog # 830

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fragments Prior to Fragmentation - Blog 829

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Preparing for the Future - Weekly Blog # 831

          

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Preparing for the Future

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

 

The fundamental job of an equity investor and manager is to grow current assets to fulfill future needs. Since we don’t know what the future will be or when it will be, we should consider a range of possibilities. My training at the racetrack and the US Marine Corps supports viewing the various futures through the various lenses of security analysis. I cannot think of a more difficult set of conditions than those facing us today.  

 

The possibilities range from the outmoded thinking of present world autocratic senior leaders (Biden, Trump, Xi, Putin, and similar) to unknown people with more scientific knowledge, but little management experience. To use an expression from the track, the odds-on-bet for the foreseeable future is that our present leaders will leave the scene relatively soon. They will probably be largely replaced by leaders two generations younger, who think differently and whose mental languages are different than what we have learned. 

 

Allow me to show you a mathematical approach from my world of mutual fund analysis. My old firm continues to report the weekly performance of mutual funds broken into seven investment objectives based on the securities in their portfolios. Most of the assets are in US Diversified Equity Fund investment objectives, which are divided into 18 peer groups. In the first quarter of 2024 there were 5 peer groups where the average performance was double digits. Interestingly, for the ten-year period there were 6 peer groups with double-digit winners. Four out of the six were repeaters. While all 18 performance peer groups generated double digit returns for the most recent 1-year period, only one generated double digit returns for two years two for 3 years, and 13 for five years. This suggests that immediately prior to the pandemic was a good time to invest in the average US Diversified Equity Fund. Accepting below average returns in the short term produced good results in the long term. This further suggests that picking the right year to sell an investment is more important than the right year to buy. However, as with almost every betting rule, the opposite can work. 

 

I believe you need to pay attention to the nature of the period when buying or selling. Investors in the US market should probably recognize that the average performance year is generally single digits, which should be evaluated relative to the performance of peers. Broader considerations should be left to double digit years, like now. Bet against the crowd if you intend to sell in a holding period shorter than five years.

 

Management Structure is Not Optimal 

The President’s cabinet is non-voting and is at best an advisory group. Large meeting tables of decision makers should be avoided, be they for political organizations, business, or non-profits (including educational and medical groups). The groups needing large meeting tables are not likely to produce dynamic results. President George Washington had a cabinet of 4 people, the secretaries of State, Treasury, and War, plus the Attorney General. Our present Cabinet has 26 members, 15 Department heads and 11 Cabinet level officers. 

 

Another Focus Should Be Updated 

 I don’t have the underlying data on our government leaders, but I suspect the majority have not spent operational and/or educational time in Asia or Africa. As a global investor I believe it is essential to correct this to effectively deal with the fundamental problems coming down the road. 

 

PS 

This week there have been a number of articles about the death of Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel prize winning psychiatrist and developer of behavioral investing. His basic premise was that investors are not rational and invest more for psychological reasons than sound investment reasons. This discussion may bring us back to rational decision making with your help.

 

Like most analysts and others commenting on investments, I have done the easy half of the job by supplying my thoughts on the buying function of investing. The much more difficult function is the disposal of investments, which is normal for the investment related committees of the two tech-oriented universities on which I serve. The reason for this one-sided effort is that making a buy decision is relatively easy.

 

By far the more difficult task is deciding to sell all or a part of an investment, which is a much more a personal decision and much more complex. The decision process should deal with some or all of the following topics:

• Likely reaction when other critical investors find out.
• Tax implications.
• Impact of the decision on the rest of portfolio.
• Dealing with beneficiaries.
• Legal aspects.
• Performance results.
• A least 10 other factors

I intend to share my impressions over time, with the thought that my audience of bright, experienced people will share their reactions. The reason I mentioned the groups of bright people I am connected with is that I learn how they approach various investment problems and use this information to address issues we all need to manage.

 

Next week, most of the blog will be devoted to an article produced by a brilliant well-rounded Professor from the Stevens Institute of Technology. The article explores how government actions had an unintended inflationary impact.

 

I am very interested to hear your reactions to this experience.

 

     

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: American Voters Win & Lose - Weekly Blog # 830

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fragments Prior to Fragmentation - Blog 829

Mike Lipper's Blog: Collateral Rewards, Risks, & Opportunities - Weekly Blog # 828

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.