What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What We Should Have Been Watching?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Lessons from the racetrack and life

At any given time, humans tend to congregate around what is most important to them or what is going to happen. These topics are labeled favorites, both at the track and by psychologists. On any given day at the track favorites win a minority of the races. More importantly, when favorites win the payoffs are relatively small, as the winnings must be shared with a large number who have reached the same conclusion.  Thus, backing the favorite is a low return game.

 

The problem in going with the less popular is their winning ratio is lower, as most people bet on the favorites. Thus, in terms of frequency, favorite betting wins.

 

There is a more rewarding goal, winning more money over time with less frequency but higher returns. This is the choice I learned at the track and apply to investing in securities.

 

This Week as an Example

Using the public media and limited public conversation, their favorite investment topic was the speech by Fed Chair Jerome Powell at Woods Hole, the implication of which was a cut in short-term interest rates. While most investors believe these are probably the most important questions to be asked, I believe there are more important questions with higher, longer-term implications. These can be grouped under labels of concentration and valuation.

 

Concentration

Much has been written about the amount of money invested in seven or ten largely technology/financial stocks. One study shows that the ten most popular stocks in the S&P 500 represent 38% of the total value of the entire index. On average, the ten largest market caps in the index between 1880 and 2010 represented only 24%. However, I question the math or source because railroads represented 63% of the stock market in 1881.

 

This observation is of particular interest to me as a graduate of Columbia College. Around 1880 Columbia had an endowment account restricted to investment in the most secure stocks. You guessed it, lawyers restricted the investments to railroads!! This particular endowment was to be spent on bricks for the campus. Thus, for many years all of Columbia’s buildings were brick faced.

 

There were many important implications that should have been drawn from this case, especially since every single railroad went into bankruptcy years later. However, if you had included political analysis along with legal analysis it was obvious railroads had become too powerful in the country.

 

In terms of political analysis and understanding how the US works politically, people should read a new 856-page book written by Bruce Ellig, a good friend of ours. The title of the book is “What You Should Know about the 47 US Presidents”. The book devotes a chapter to each President, covering the most important laws and regulations of his term. Included in the book is information about the President’s life and personal activities.

 

Valuations

John Auters of Bloomberg believes “valuations are extreme”. Prices in terms of sales, earnings, book value, and dividends are at a stretching point. In a recent survey of intuitional managers, 91% believe the US market is overvalued and 49% believe emerging markets are undervalued. Some 60 years ago I worked for a research-director who believed shipments of boxes were a good economic indicator. They probably still are, and that is why I took notice that they were down -5% in the second quarter.

 

With the federal government pushing to let retail investors participate in private capital transactions, particularly private equity, the health of the market for these longer-term, illiquid investments, could impact the listed market. There are approximately 3100 positions in private capital firms that are unsold. Their retail owners may not see the level of distributions they were expecting, which could unfortunately increase the volume of listed securities to be sold.

 

Long-Term Horizons:

 In the long run equity investing can generate very attractive returns. A dollar invested in the 1870 equity market by the 25th of July would be worth $32,240 in nominal dollars before taxes this year.

 

 As often said, history does not repeat but often rhymes. There are a number of parallels with the market crash of August 1929 to November 1936, and the economic depression that followed from February 1937 to February 1945, which will be discussed in upcoming blogs.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rising Risk Focus - Weekly Blog # 900

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

An Uneasy Week with Long Concerns - Weekly Blog # 884

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

An Uneasy Week with Long Concerns

 

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

                             

 

The Week that Was

Harkening back to an old London-based television program focused on the week’s changes, the following items of interest and perhaps importance crossed my computer screen:

1.  Two brief bear-market type rallies.
2. The US dollar broke par on Friday, finishing at 100.102. (Marcus Ashworth of Bloomberg believes that as much as some try to find a successful substitute, it can’t be found.)
3. Price signals – The Baltic Dry Index fell to 1274 vs 1729 a year ago; The ECRI industrial price index fell to 113.27 or -4.33% from a year ago. (This index measures the prices of industrial materials needed for production e.g. metals.)
4. Only Precious Metals and Dedicated Short mutual fund averages gained for the week ended Thursday.
5. Volatility increased in the week, with InfoTech stocks leading with gains of +9.67% while the Hang Seng Index fell -8.47%. (Normally the high/low spread is closer to high single digits than 18 percentage points.)
6. Market liquidity may be a major contributor to the market indices ranking year to date; DJIA -6.94%, S&P 500 -10.43%, and NASDAQ -15.14%.
7. Both analysts at Morgan Stanley and those contributing to Seeking Alpha Quant Ratings downgraded mid-cap investment bankers and mid-sized fund manager stocks. (Compared to their larger peers they rely almost exclusively on their brains, rather than a combination of brains and capital.)

 

Longer-Term Implications

• Howard Marks believes we have seen the best economic period in history.
• Marcus Ashworth believes we have entered the beginnings of a new phase this week.
• President Trump has told associates that he can tolerate a recession, but he is afraid of a depression.

 

Question: Do any of the elements mentioned in this blog aid or lead to a change in your thinking?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Short Term Rally Expected + Long Term Odds - Weekly Blog # 883

Mike Lipper's Blog: Increase in Bearish News is Long-Term Bullish - Weekly Blog # 882

Mike Lipper's Blog: Odds Favor A Recession Followed Up by the Market - Weekly Blog # 881

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Unclear Data Mostly Bearish, but Bullish Later - Weekly Blog # 870

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Unclear Data Mostly Bearish, but Bullish Later

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

First Half

Marcus Ashworth is one of the best market analysts who writes daily for Bloomberg.  In a recent piece he focused on volatility, with the following introduction:

The election of Donald Trump introduces an 

unwelcome capriciousness to US policy making,

with everything from trade to regulation to crypto-

currencies looking decidedly less predictable. And 

while the US consumer continues to defy expectation

by keeping the world’s largest economy rolling

along just fine, the rest of the world is a lot less

robust. Our key message for 2025: Buckle up, it’s

“gonna” be a roller coaster.

 

It is my own view that even Mr. Trump does not have a complete view of what is going to happen. As shown in the recent election of the House Speaker, members of both the Senate and House act differently than the majority of their party and will be paid off in some known or unknown way. Furthermore, going back to early American history, foreign powers will express their will and influence on our results and actions.

 

Chartists’ Views

We have heard many times that history does not repeat itself but often rhymes. One of the easiest ways to record the rhymes is through charts, which are often right as to future price moves. They have learned that future reversals can frequently be successfully predicted. The standard pattern for trend reversals is a “head and shoulders silhouette”. The three or more peaks with the center one being the highest shows each of the peaks declining to a common neckline. Currently, the two shoulders have hit their necklines and bounced up a bit. Most important to me, this describes the S&P 500 price action. If it breaks the neckline that indicates the likely chance of a significant decline.

 

Historically, significant declines often follow substantial increases, like those we have experienced. Declines often occur after valuations have been stretched like a rubber band. The measure I find helpful is the ratio of market value to book value. Currently, the S&P 500 ratio is 5.37x vs 4.58x a year ago. This seems like quite a stretch.

 

AAII

Many professional analysts look down on the retail market despite a reasonably good long-term track record. Like many others, it tends to be wrong at turning points. The AAII sample survey asks their participants if they are bullish or bearish for the next 6 months. I find the percentage difference between the bulls and bears of interest. The spread for last week was only 1.9% vs. 3.7% the week before. In each case the bulls were on top. My reading is that these investors are usually very intense in their views. The view they share with many professionals is that they are waiting, but don’t know what they are waiting for!

 

Other Straws in the Wind

Many of these relationships could change significantly:

• The bottom third of credit card holders are tapped out.
• The five best-selling car brands in the US are foreign.
• Only 44% of weekly prices tracked by the WSJ were up in the latest week.        

 

Most Funds Don’t Perform

There are 103 peer groups that I look at to see if they on average beat the S&P 500 Index fund. Below are the results showing the number of Equity and Equity Related Fund Groups that beat the average S&P 500 Index Fund for 1, 5, and 10 years.

 1-Year     5-Years      10-Years

   8            4               3

   

Just like following Professional Golfers, the ordinary weekend player can learn useful techniques, avoid many injuries, and enjoy investing.

 

Beware of Simplistic Data

It is popular to compare mutual fund gross sales to ETF sales, taking the difference as an indication of popularity. The problem is fund redemptions are built-in the day a fund is purchased. Redemptions for many holders is the completion of a planned period or condition, regardless of performance. The average age of a mutual fund owner is senior to when they initially purchased the fund. Many redemptions are also mandated by retirement vehicles, such as required mandated distributions.

 

ETFs are like buying individual securities. The buyer is often considerably younger and considers it a form of trading. To net these actions is like purchasing a car for dating when you need a car to get to work or to transport your family.

 

Question: Are there any topics you would like me to explore, or correct?    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Different Year End Blog: Looking Forward - Weekly Blog # 869

Mike Lipper's Blog: Three Rs + Beginnings of a New Cycle - Weekly Blog # 868

Mike Lipper's Blog: Confessions & Confusion of a “Numbers Nerd” - Weekly Blog # 867

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Trade, Invest, and/or Sell - Weekly Blog # 836

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Trade, Invest, and/or Sell

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

      

       

 

Every moment of our investment lives we accept the choice and risk of investing in equities, or alternatively accept the risk of not investing in equities. There are two valuable insights that may be helpful in reaching your investment posture.

 

The first insight rests on investment history. John Auters, a well-respected columnist now with Bloomberg wrote this week “History is clear it’s very, very dangerous to get out of stocks.” He was relying on data from Barclays using average annual returns for each component: cash, bonds, and stocks, covering the 20, 10, 5, & 1-year periods. The study showed stocks outperforming cash and bonds for each slice of investment history. This was not surprising, stock investors expected it.  What was surprising was the absence of a single 20-year period of losing money. This should provide some comfort to the two university investment committees on which I serve, as well as other long-term non-profits and those who supervise inter-generational trusts. (Due to a more strenuous history in the UK, a 23-year period will produce the same results as the US.)

 

When thinking of strategy, it would be prudent to remember the wise words of Jaime Dimon, the 20-year CEO of JP Morgan Chase, the most intensely managed global bank. He said, “We know we are going to be wrong”. (The key is recognizing the mistake and correct it.)

 

What about Bonds

We are on the verge of generating US Treasury yields of 5%+, with high quality corporates already at that level. Because of a hike in the Fed rate or some other driver, we may possibly be dealing with 2 - 30-year treasury yields reaching 5% or higher. If that were to happen it could harken back to the years when the retail market and some institutions plowed money into the “magic fives”, which attracted cash and/or redemption cash from funds, bank accounts, or the sale of equities.

 

With US Treasuries generally accepted as the safest investment vehicle, there was a rush to own them. Since 1928 there have been 19 years where yields on US Treasuries were negative. Not bad, 97 years with no defaults. (Mutual funds owning a portfolio of bonds continuously buy treasuries, so they don’t have a fixed maturity or a date certain when the holder will receive full payment of principal and interest, which the owner of the actual individual bonds does). Thus, there is low risk to the owner of bonds, which should be considered for a below equity return, with the odds suggesting a positive return.

 

Potential Worry List

There is an overabundance of favorable news from largely left media-oriented sources, with little or any balance. There is a need to identify what could go wrong. Some suggest the radio operator of the Titanic was too busy sending out congratulatory messages to receive iceberg warnings on its maiden voyage. (Is the list of worries analogous to the iceberg messages not received by the ship’s senior officers?) History suggests we could be surprised by governmental activities until the end of 2024.

• The feedback communications loop is getting weaker. Print advertisements are dropping at both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. One day last week the eastern edition of the Journal was reduced to one section, rather than the usual multiple sections. Major ad agencies are reporting weak advertising revenues. Much of the decline is probably a function of less advertising by the big box department stores, except by those closing branches.
• The shopping habits of lower income customers are changing, with lower priced merchandise replacing higher priced brands.
• Industrial product prices rose +1.87% last week after a period of little movement. On a year-to-date basis industrial prices have risen 3.56%. (I wonder if the long-term inflation rate will settle in the 3-4% range rather than the 2% level stated by the New Zealand central bank.)
• Some manufacturers have noted some of their customers building a stash of their supplier’s products, delaying sales by the producer. (I don’t know if this is due to past supply-chain issues and/or the customer hedging against future inflated prices. The second occurs more frequently in countries where short-term interest rates are high or not available.
• Revenue dollars are reported, what is not reported is the number of transactions. In some cases when unit growth is meaningfully below revenue, prices have likely risen, which is not likely to be a frequent event. (As an analyst trying to predict the future growth rate, I would reduce the future revenue growth rate. It is much more difficult to project the impact of future profit margin improvements. It may be wise to use a 10-year average, excluding any double-digit year.)
• The developed world needs more productive workers. April job creation in the US was the second lowest going back to at least January 2022. The US birth rate has been below the replacement rate for some time.
• Stock markets participants are sending mixed messages. Of the 32 weekly stock price indices published by S&P Dow Jones, 28 rose and 4 fell, with 3 being overseas and one domestic.
• The AAII sample survey shows 40.8% bullish and 32.1% bearish for the next 6 months. The bulls are much more volatile, their reading three weeks ago was 23.8%. Over the same period the bears declined from 35.9%.
• Transactions in the markets were also split. 35% of the volume on the NYSE fell, while 45% on the NASDAQ declined.
• In terms of the leading fund performance by sector. Though Thursday the utility sector led with +4.53%. The worst performance was generated by Indian Region funds, with a return of -2.77%.

 

Unlike the captain and crew, I am aware of risks and have a buying reserve and many holdings.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Secular Investment Religions - Weekly Blog # 835

Mike Lipper's Blog: Avoiding Many Mistakes - Weekly Blog # 834

Mike Lipper's Blog: News & Reactions - Weekly Blog # 833

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

       

 

Caution: This Time Is Different - Weekly Blog # 825

 

      

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Caution: This Time Is Different

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

 

       

Warning

The standard excuse for breaking the historic pattern of following precedent is the current situation being fundamentally different than the past. The break in historic pattern makes it appropriate to not copy the past pattern of each substantial rise and decline.

 

The problem with the old pattern is that it is two dimensional. If it is going up, it will next go down. However, the next driving direction may be diagonal or a collection of reversing diagonal moves.

 

Worst News for The Leadership

One or more diagonals will upset political leadership, leaders of business, military, non-profits, education, and others in a position of responsiveness. One example is the CEO of Walmart, the largest retailer in the world. He noted that in the general merchandize category the US was in a deflationary price trend. However, in the grocery category the prices of some items like eggs, apples, asparagus, blackberries, paper goods, and cleaning supply were simultaneously rising. (The first four items are classic supply and demand oriented. The last two have significant manufacturing cost elements in their cost structure.) Is Walmart suffering from inflation or deflation?

 

There is a third input caused by substitution. Packing fewer items in a smaller package lowers the price but increases the frequency of purchase. Still another substitute would be lowering the quality of goods and services sold, such as producing less powerful batteries for hand-held devices.

 

Consumers and Investors Are the Real Losers

The unsuspecting real losers are consumers, investors, and any on the receiving end of actions served up by organizations relying on classically trained economists. They make these judgements about the quantity of goods and services. (Have you noticed the dexterous taste of meat and other agricultural products due to cost-cutting providers!)

 

There Are Other Numbers that Drive Investment

There are often other reasons companies are acquired. This week it was announced that Capital One, a Virginia Bank with a very large credit card business, is attempting to buy Discover Financial (*), also a very large credit card bank. If permitted, the transaction would create a card processor as large as Mastercard and Visa. This could change the entire credit card and consumer bank businesses.

(*) Owned in personal or managed accounts)

 

On Saturday, Berkshire Hathaway (*) issued its annual report and shareholder letter. (A copy of my internal reaction to the letter is available to our blog subscribers by sending me an email at AML@Lipperadvising.com) The shareholder letter mentioned that their BHE owned utility served the population of ten midwestern and western states. (To the best of my knowledge this is an unrecognized and unused asset which could be of great marketing value in the future. It is the sort of non-balance asset that represents hidden value not tabulated in government records.

 

Another example of a business asset transforming into a financial asset capable of changing the nature of competition in the securities markets surfaced this week. This was captured in the following headline from the Financial Times “S&P Global nears deal for Visible Alpha in effort to compete with Bloomberg.” (Shares in S&P Global are owned in proprietary accounts.) Visible Alpha collects research reports from major Wall Street firms and distributes them electronically. It thus attaches additional value to research, beyond that provided by the originating firm and their direct clients. If the deal goes through the consortium of firms will probably pass the proceeds back to the issuing houses, partially converting an expense item to a capital item.  

 

A “Smart Money” Bet on Market Direction

Regular readers of this blog know that my primary investment academy is the racetrack. Always trying to improve my results I learned to look at what I thought was the “Smart Money” at the track. Applying that principle to investing I see a decline as the next major move, for the following three reasons:

1. Both the Chairman and President of JP Morgan Chase have recently sold some of their shares. In the case of Jaime Dimon, it is his first recorded sale. Since he bought some shares in the public market, I assume they will represent a portion of what he sells. The President sold some earlier in the year.
2. Berkshire has been a net seller for the last four quarters, including two stocks that we own, BYD and Apple.
3. Many industrial/service companies have issued layoff notices and/or have delayed start dates for new recruits. These are significant. My guess, many of these companies have found it difficult to hire the right people over the last couple of years. In many cases, new employees take one or more years for their employers to earn back what they are paid. With a layoff today probably costing future profits well into next year, it is likely a well thought out decision.

 

I consider all of these to be bright people and consequently advocate building up trading reserves. However, I also recommend maintaining significant permanent equity positions, as I could be wrong.    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What Moves the Stock Market? - Weekly Blog # 824

Mike Lipper's Blog: Picking Winners/Avoiding Losers - Weekly Blog # 823

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This “Bull Market” Real? - Weekly Blog # 822

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Picking Winners/Avoiding Losers - Weekly Blog # 823

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Picking Winners/Avoiding Losers

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

     

Mindset

Every investor, speculator, analyst, portfolio manager, and politician’s job is to find winners and avoid losers. My fundamental training for accomplishing these goals for my family and others relies on my training at the racetrack.

 

The first requirement for success is recognizing where you are and periodically admitting when you are not right, which is distinct from being wrong. Right now, I admit I have been wrong. Using the S&P 500 index’s closing price performance on Friday plus a minimum 3% premium, WE’VE APPERENTLY ENTERED A NEW BULL MARKET.

 

This assertion is based solely on the numbers, although there is considerable short and long-term evidence to the contrary. Nevertheless, one lesson learned from the track is admitting your mistakes when holding a losing ticket. Learning something from your mistakes should often make you a winner. Mistakes are both normal and repetitive. The most valuable lesson is learning how to avoid them in the future.

 

Current Contrary Conditions

The latest stimulus for the market was surprisingly strong Labor Department jobs numbers, which probably disagree with the household numbers due to an increase in the number of people working two or three jobs. Perhaps more significantly, there were 601,000 more government workers than the 257,000 in domestic manufacturing. (Productivity is difficult to calculate accurately, and it is hard to value its worth. Perhaps the same could be said about the number of government workers.) Hardly a week goes by without an announcement by a large employer laying off 10% or more of their workforce. Those laid-off but receiving some settlement should not qualify for government pay. There are secondary layoffs which don’t normally get noticed, such as Abrdn cutting its use of Bloomberg terminals.

 

Longer-Term Worries

Structurally, we and the rest of the world are living more expensively. For the US it can be summed up on a secular basis. Total interest costs are already larger than defense and Medicare costs combined. An aging population with rising medical costs, fewer workers, and more expensive weapons, among other things is driving these expenses.

 

History does not exactly repeat itself but does rhyme. Technology changes, but the way people act rarely does. It is quite possible we have been in a period of low productivity and stagflation since the COVID years, paralleling the 1930s with some of the aftereffects of the 1940s. Hopefully we will not waste time and money trying to spend our way out of it, although current leadership around the world seems to be imitating those back then.

 

How to Invest

Recognize that the betting odds do not favor straight-line extrapolation. We individually will have to move cyclically and at times it will be unpopular with current opinion leaders. Some suggestions won’t work or will only work infrequently.

 

Targets of Opportunity

• Hospitals and Health Care will grow bigger, more complicated, and require management skills not frequently present today.
• Market popularity will prove to be expensive and will not last long. The gap between leaders, followers, laggards, and mavericks will be large. It will be difficult to consistently travel with the same people. Few, if any, can effectively work successfully up and down the ladder. Very little will be permanent, and it will come at a cost.
• Two lowly valued sectors, transportation and advertising, could be good opportunities for the talented.
• Also of interest are companies that have intelligently managed turnarounds, either by changing dramatically in size, location, or the makeup of their performance drivers.

 

Please share your targets and progress with me.    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Is This “Bull Market” Real? - Weekly Blog # 822

Mike Lipper's Blog: Worth vs Price Historically - Weekly Blog # 821

Mike Lipper's Blog: 2 Media Sins Likely to Hurt Investors - Weekly Blog # 820

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

“SMART MONEY” Acts Selectively - Weekly Blog # 819

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

“SMART MONEY” Acts Selectively

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

Dull Week with Some Clues

The stock market from mid-December through this Friday was flat, except for an early bubble in January. (I suspect the NASDAQ price surge resulted from the replacement of some holdings sold for tax purposes in the fourth quarter.) Market analysts suggest a flat price pattern might represent the smart money either accumulating or distributing meaningful positions. This suggests prices will either move up sharply or fall rapidly after a period of time. I will attempt to examine what I perceive as clues to future major moves.

 

NYSE and NASDAQ stocks declined for four of five days in the latest week. The DJIA rose for three days and the more professionally followed Dow Jones Transportation Index fell for three days. As a contrarian measure, analysts watch the latest weekly summary survey published by the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). In the latest survey, participants raised their 6-month bullish prediction to +48.6 % or double their bearish guess of +24.2%. (Lucky for those who work in the market and those who live off of it. Individual investors have a good long-term record. From a contrarian viewpoint following them has value, because they are wrong at critical turning points.)

 

The number of publicly traded companies has been dropping for many years, mostly due to acquisitions, not failures. In 2023 there were 15,766 IPOs vs 17592 the year before. More significantly, the money raised dropped to $170 billion from $242 billion.

 

There are several thoughtful columnists who occasionally focus on financial history. John Authers of Bloomberg wrote “America is disinflating…disappointingly slowly.” He believes a major future expansion would require more problems than are currently visible. James Mackintosh of the WSJ warns investors that the market goes up and usually produces satisfactory returns in most 20-year periods. There are a few times it does not. (It’s important to remind investors that there can be times when investors won’t be bailed out in a given 20-year period. I wonder if that is why 30-year bonds and mortgages were created.) I believe he would have more confidence in recoveries if interest rates were set by the market and not by government fiat.

 

One problem with many economists, both within and outside government, is that they do not have enough appreciation for lessons learned from Asia and the Middle East. For example, we don’t seem to appreciate the products and technology that came to the West along the Silk Road. The following is a list of products or services that traveled the series of trans-Asian roads:

 

Silk, Hemp, Cotton, Wool, Paper (Paper Money). Fireworks (Explosives). Gunpowder, Tea, Horses, and algebra from India.

 

Working Conclusions

Recognizing that I don’t know what the future will bring, I turn to my investment/betting framework for a relatively conservative perspective. For the time period ended early 2025, I suggest there is a 60% chance of a significant US equity decline. The decline will perhaps be in the neighborhood of 20%, with an outside 50% chance of a full depression with an 80% drop. There are also two other possibilities at 20% each. First, a 5-7-year period of stagflation, and second, a 20% chance of below 4% GDP growth.

 

For estate planning purposes with a 30-year outlook, expect equity returns to be in the 5-9% range.

 

Your Thoughts?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Solo Messaging is Meaningless - Weekly Blog # 818

Mike Lipper's Blog: Our Wishes & Perspectives - Weekly Blog # 817

Mike Lipper's Blog: Dangers “Smart Money” & Thin Markets - Weekly Blog # 816

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Reactions from a Contrarian - Weekly Blog # 814

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Reactions from a Contrarian

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Surprises Pay More Than Consensus

Consensus, when right, is not highly rewarded. Contrarians are correct less than consensus suggests but they receive greater rewards. Over time, the bigger winners start out by being relative loners. With these guidelines, I review my reactions to media comments. (Remember, my absolute right to be wrong.)

 

The Indices are at yearly highs; therefore, we have entered a “bull market.”  Not necessarily! In some cases, these are not all-time highs. Additionally, the indices need to be measured in the most valuable currency in order to enter a new market cycle. Trading volumes are also not impressive. We live in a global world with the US dollar declining, so we ought to adjust the peaks and valleys accordingly.

 

Possibly the best summary of market moves comes from Bank of America, which describes it as emotionally bullish but intellectually bearish.

 

When the Fed pivots it will be a seminal event. Possibly, but odds are it will be late. For those predicting a pivot, they are like football fans calling the pivot wrong six times in a row. They could be right, but their odds are no better than 50/50.

 

There are at least three other reasons to question the timing of an interest rate cut.

1. The original ignition of the inflation fire was caused by the Administration pouring an excessive amount of cash into consumer’s hands and restricting domestic trade.
2. Congress pushed the responsibility for full employment to a bunch of financial economists at the Fed, which led to it becoming politicized.
3. Most importantly, the largest factor in the US economy is not the production of goods, it is services. In general, service providers don’t need to borrow money for capital expenditures and inventory.

 

Current Market Focus Does Not Address Long-Term Problems

Almost all the attention of market participants is focused on short-term events, which are expected to determine short-term results. Media performance reporting on minute by minute, day by day, week by week, and year by year results view this as the only essential reality. These short timeframes are essentially important to traders, but of little value to long-term investors.

 

Most money invested in the market is for retirement, or longer. The assumption ought to be that the average worker probably still has 25 years before retirement and a somewhat similar period in retirement. Many institutions can have indefinite lives. Thus, the things that are really important to these investors are actions impacting the long-term progress of their assets and liabilities.

 

One of the reasons good analysts and portfolio managers study history is to get an understanding of market cycles, which are caused by insufficient supply of goods and services in the minds of consumers and investors, followed by periods of too much excessive production. These trends take a long to very long time to evolve. However, their terminal stages often occur swiftly and rarely reverse.

 

Three Trends That Hurt Investors

1. Political skills are paramount over operating skills. Most large organizations are comprised of collections of people with different backgrounds and strengths. Those who rise to the top are most often chosen for their political skills, with less attention paid to their operating and investment skills. These leaders recognize that their positions have finite termination dates, so their decision process is relatively short-term, with little regard for long-term implications.
2. The costs of developing and maintaining military strength reduces the available supply for other funding. There are a relatively small number of nations with significant power. The US has historically cut military spending sharply during “peace time”, as it tends to fall behind the ambitions of autocrats. Considering the current crop of political leaders and their tendency to cut military spending after inflation. Today there is no large military power that has any respect for the current US power base. They however recognize our potential, much like Germany and Japan did prior to WWII, making the world an increasingly less safe place. The leaders of Western Europe recognize that they cannot defend themselves. One leading expert believes that Germany needs 30 years to build its own independent force to safely defend Germany.
3. By far the biggest threat to the US, both commercially and militarily, is our youth. Based on global test comparisons, US students rank below mid-point in math and not close to the top in reading and science. Remember, we probably have the most expensive educational system in the world. To protect professors the US government measures academic college success over six years. In the UK, the normal college period is three years.

 

 Other Items of Concern

1. John Authers, now at Bloomberg and formerly with the Financial Times, believes that we should expect US defaults, particularly of regional banks.  Altman Z scores are the lowest since 1987.
2. China has stopped publishing youth unemployment data. (This habit of putting out just positives raises more questions than answers.)

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: 3 Senior Lessons + Upsetting Parallel - Weekly Blog # 813

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Cyclical World + Consistent Results - Weekly Blog # 812

Mike Lipper’s Blog: Recognizing a Professional: Ratings vs Ranking – Weekly Blog # 811

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.