Showing posts with label Yields. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yields. Show all posts

Saturday, August 2, 2025

Rising Risk Focus - Weekly Blog # 900

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Rising Risk Focus

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

                 

Friday’s Four-Letter Word

In polite society we are encouraged to limit the use of four-letter words. This could be the reason we try to not use them in the financial world, which is a disservice to our performance analysis and investment achievements. Thus, I am dedicating our 900th blog to articulating the key to our investment survival, risk.

 

Risk is the penalty for being wrong, although it is also critical to winning. Without risk there would probably be no rewards for winning. As Lenin said, “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.” It is possible last Friday was one of those weeks. After an extended period of “melt-up” from mid-April, stock indices, driven by a minority of their stocks, fell by large single digits or more. The media attributes the decline to employment.

 

Employment

Employment encompasses both large and small numbers of people, including us. The impact of employment is much broader than the number of people being paid to work, it influences both production and sales. (In the modern world published data does not include people who work without pay. Furthermore, there is no published data on the quality of the work done, nor the quality of those who wish to be hired. For current employers with open job positions, it is the absence of the last unknown factors which raises serious questions concerning the likelihood those open slots will soon be filled.)

 

One problem with the employment data is that only about 60% of the organizations report their numbers to the government on time, catching up in subsequent months. Thus, adjustments are normal. The current period includes the fiscal year ends for state and local governments, end of teaching year, and the federal government shrinking its totals. Regular users of this data probably understand these issues and adjust their thinking accordingly.

 

Bond Prices

Many businesses, governments, non-profits, and individuals generate insufficient revenue to pay for their purchases each and every day. To the extent they lack sufficient reserves of idle cash, they often borrow. Depending on their size and credit worthiness they will use the bond or credit markets. Unlike equity which has an indefinite life, bonds or credits have identified maturities. Consequently, the providers of cash are very focused on the short-term outlook of the borrowers. Each week Barron’s publishes a couple of useful bond price indices, consisting of ten selected high-grade and medium-grade bonds each.

 

Barron’s found another use for this data when they discovered that medium-grade bond prices rose more than high grade bond prices within a year of the stock’s price rise. Stocks decline when bond investors favor high-grade bonds. On Friday, high-grade prices didn’t move while medium-grade bond prices fell (yields went up). This is a negative prediction on the future of the stock market.

 

The negative view is understandable, many of these credits belong to industrial companies. Another source of information is the ECRI, which publishes an industrial price index which tends to move slowly. However, by Friday that index had risen 3.6%, which will increase inflation. (I assume it was the result of the announced level of tariffs.)

 

Questions

Has the Administration in their planning adjusted their expenses for the enforcement of tariffs? I wonder if we will see increased smuggling across our borders if the tariffs stay on for long? Are we increasing the Coast Guards’ budget?  How much will Scotch sales decline and Bourbon sales rise?

 

Please share your views.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Melt Up Not Convincing - Weekly Blog # 899

Mike Lipper's Blog: It May Be Early - Weekly Blog # 898

Mike Lipper's Blog: Misperceptions: Contrarian & Other Viewpoints: Majority vs Minority - Weekly Blog # 897



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, November 17, 2024

Reading the Future from History - Weekly Blog # 863

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Reading the Future from History

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

History May Suggest:

  1. The American People Won the Election
  2. The Recession has started

 

The Declaration of Independence was signed on August 2nd, 1776, the US Constitution was passed in 1787, and the last state (Rhode Island) ratified it in 1790. Today, Rhode Island still remains the smallest state in the Union. Thus, since the beginning of our nation the rights of our smallest state have been critical to our progress. One of the many things making the US different than other republics is The Founding Fathers fear of the tyranny of the larger states on the smaller states. Consequently, our Electoral College favors state representation over population. In the 2024 election, even though President Trump polled more votes than Vice President Harris, the House is almost evenly split, but he won 36 states and lost only 14, mostly on the coasts or major rivers.

 

This split is one reason I suggested President Trump will likely have difficulty getting much legislation easily passed through both houses, where he only has a majority of about five votes. Of the 14 major issues, only two can be accomplished through just executive orders.

 

Actually, many if not most Americans are pleased with the results of the election. An incompetent government was dismissed before it became even more intrusive and has been replaced by a new administration with untried ideas. New legislation will be delayed by a disruptive Congress and a slow-walking Deep State. Many Americans would like it if the air conditioners in D.C. did not work, fulfilling Hamilton and Madison desire that government work be part-time.

 

Recession Coming?

As someone rowing in a boat with the wind picking up and clouds darkening, you become relatively certain it will soon rain. The question is, will you get to dry land before getting really wet?

 

Evidence of an economic storm on the horizon can be summed up as follows:

  1. Stock analysts have been instructed for generations that high quality bonds are more sensitive to economic changes than stocks, at least initially. Currently, yields have been going up (prices down). However, mid-quality bond prices have barely moved at all, something overseas fixed income investors are very sensitive to.
  2. Most US stock prices declined this week, with just 37.7% of the stocks on the NYSE rising and only 27.6% rising on the NASDAQ. NASDAQ stocks have performed better than those on the “Big Board” for some time and are cheaper on a market to book value basis. This suggests the NASDAQ investor is a more professional investor.
  3. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey of investors indicates the bullish or bearishness sentiment of their investors for the next six months. In the last three weeks, the bullish reading has risen to 49.8% from 39.5%, while the bearish reading only went down to 28.3% from 30.9%. Market analysts believe the “public” is often wrong at turning points. With that in mind, it is interesting that the bulls gained 10.3% while the bears dropped only 2.2%.
  4. The weekend WSJ tracks some 72 prices of stock indices, commodities, ETFs, and currencies. This week only 12.5% were up, with Natural Gas up a leading 5.77%. The remaining gainers all rose by less than 2%. This likely indicates sophisticated investors are nervous about what lies ahead.

 

 

Thoughts?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk - Weekly Blog # 862

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

Mike Lipper's Blog: Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, December 17, 2023

Searching For Answers - Weekly Blog # 815

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Searching For Answers

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 



Neural Basis for Preferences

In one of the laboratories in the Humanities and Social Sciences Division of Caltech, a former post-doc led a paper showing a neural basis for making aesthetic preferences like qualities-contrast, hues, dynamics, and concreteness. (Kiyohito Iigaya, is now an assistant professor of neurobiology at Columbia University’s Irving Medical Center.) A similar type of pattern recognition is what successful investors use in selecting investments, such as relative price, operating free cash flow generation, management process, investment sponsorship, competitive position, and future changes in these and other qualities.

I am a senior trustee at Caltech and a member of the board of Advisors of CUIMC

 

Painters, like Picasso, were successful investors in both art and other investments. However, the tracking of investment qualities is insufficient to produce a record of continued investment success.

 

At least two additional qualities need to be tracked.

  1. Analyzing changes in the structure of the investment market, in terms of flows and after-tax profits.
  2. The perceived multiple needs of the investor.

 

The eternal job of the investor is to evaluate these and other qualities relative to each other. There is no precise ranking information on these qualities, which makes it difficult for quants to use.

 

It is with this as a background I look at elements each week. The remainder of this week’s blog is devoted to some of the highlights that guided me in making multiple investment decisions. I am interested in which factors are important to you, and whether you disagree with my reactions.

 

More Information Does Not Appear to Help

More information should reduce the number and magnitude of investment surprises. But it does not seem to help. The problem could be that the information is distributed unequally. Those with an information delivery advantage, but without sufficient capital or ownership, can have limited impact on price gaps. In accessing the situation, one difficulty may be understanding the veracity of the information at the moment of discovery. In highly speculative markets and issues, there are often more false rumors than real, actionable information. (In terms of the current market information regarding the next interest rate change, it could be wrong 6 times in a row.)

 

Banks & Brokers Cut Staff

State Street is the latest company to announce the layoff of 1500 employees. These actions do not instill near-term confidence in investors in the overall market.

 

Is Value Investing Essentially a Trade?

The fundamental principle of value investing is the current price being substantially less than the current or projected future price. In the mind of the investor this value gap is temporary, because if it is not closed there is no benefit to the purchase. Value investing is therefore a trading strategy, or a two-step move. Contrast this with investing for growth, which does not require a terminal sale except for a change in investor circumstances. This distinction has a definite impact on the timing of the purchase.

 

“Happy Talk” Motivation is Critical (Viewpoint)

Years ago, when each town had a thriving local newspaper, its publisher/CEO was a powerful person locally. Recognizing that elections create advertising demand; a lot of editorial space was devoted to newsprint.  Locally owned papers eventually disappeared and were replaced by chains, and increasingly by broadcast media. They were the beneficiaries of centrally controlled advertising revenue. The media provided much airtime to elections, with the most focus on presidential elections. In many cases, profits from presidential election-year advertising helped carry them through the other three years. Because the majority of listeners were lower income, Democratic Party spending was higher. The owners were conscious of this phenomenon, and it impacted their actions, with the bulk of the coverage/advertising focusing on economic “happy talk”. That is why “news” coverage today is more positive, and often wrong.

 

Interpreting a Signal Can Be the Opposite

The acquisition of one company by another for stock could signify that the board of the purchaser believes owning the acquired stock is better than investing in their own. An interest rate cut by the Fed could also signal a concern about the direction of the economy, or a shift in the importance of the second mandate, full employment. In other words, be careful what some wish for.

 

Personal Tax Rates Are Important

Similar to the selection of art purchases helping make security selections, foreigners can remind us of the importance of US personal tax rates. Shohei Ohtani signed a baseball contract with a gross value of $700 million. In the early part of the ten-year contract, he will be paid just $2 million per year. (He expects substantial product endorsements and other income during that period.) He will receive the other $68 million per year, without interest, when he is 50 years old. (I assume without the burden of US taxes). I wonder if he’s available as a tax consultant, as he came up with this approach.

 

“Long-Term” Different Meanings

Reliability is a characteristic many investors look for in their selection process. In the US, most investment intervals have more gaining than losing periods. The sizes of the gains are also larger than the majority of the sizes of the losses.

 

All markets move in cycles. Thus, a five-year period usually has one complete cycle and parts of another, if not two. With only 20 quarters or just 5 annual numbers, I find the number of observations too limited. The SEC in its wisdom requires mutual funds to show year by year results, overall period performance, and the best and worst quarter. Numbers nerds note that the public is given 12 slices of data. I would prefer to have quarterly data for the life of the fund, which would be 40 slices for ten years.

 

The economy has generally grown since the end of WWII, which might not continue in the future. Consequently, I am much more interested in seeing what actions, if any, were taken in negative periods. Particularly, what portfolio holdings were reduced or eliminated and how much that cost the fund in recovery periods.

 

There is one medium-sized fund group which indicates it invests for the long term, which they define as 3-5 years. We would not use this fund for most taxable investors if over that short a period it replaced almost all its starting portfolio.

 

15-Year-Olds Will Rule

At some point the 15-year-olds youths of 2021 will be part of the ruling class in many, if not most, countries. In 2021, thirty-seven countries took standardized tests in math, reading, and science. Three countries tested top three in the three subjects: Canada, Estonia, and Japan. Due in some part to the pandemic the US dropped 13 ranking spaces in the three tests, or roughly three-quarters of a year, to finish sixth on an overall basis.

 

As a grandfather and great-grandfather of 5 young ones, I am worried about the future we are leaving them. Our current educational system is the result of a deteriorating educational process that has been in decline for some time. Recently, a teacher on maternity leave at a “good school” revealed that she had decided not to return to the public school system. A real-life casualty of the dysfunctional system she worked under.

 

What scares me is the US has the most expensive educational and health systems in the world but does not lead the educational rankings in the world. A long-term oriented society that prizes excellence is necessary for world leadership. For the protection of our young people, we must on a long-term basis increase our exposure to the best minds and culture in the world.

 

Investment Conclusions

  1. Portfolios should be broken into sub portfolios based on needed investment periods and risk tolerance.
  2. The portfolio segment with an expected near-term payout should focus on trading rather than investing. Fixed income holdings should have a maturity range within the allocated payout period and only be invested in the highest quality non-US government paper. Equity should be invested in listed 2-4% yield common stocks or funds. The one exception would be Berkshire Hathaway, which is building a portfolio for the heirs of its shareholders.
  3. The next portfolio segment builds a retirement portfolio with high quality, low cash dividend payors, and no fixed income except for payment reserves.
  4. The estate portfolio segment should be invested in high quality equity modest compounders, avoiding above average yields. Use an appropriate equity strategy in an unleveraged ETF rather than a mutual fund if it makes sense, but only for one-half of your fund investments.

 

Share Your Thoughts

Do these topics and format make sense for you and how should it be improved?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Reactions from a Contrarian - Weekly Blog # 814

Mike Lipper's Blog: 3 Senior Lessons + Upsetting Parallel - Weekly Blog # 813

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Cyclical World + Consistent Results - Weekly Blog # 812

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

 

Sunday, May 15, 2022

Inconclusive, But Trending Lower - Weekly Blog # 733

                                    


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Inconclusive, But Trending Lower


 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




We Want Clarity

In truth, we don’t know what the future holds for us, our families, country, world, and oh yes, our investments. In terms of the US stock market, we are searching for a sign or a group of signs giving us the courage to act, hopefully before others. I am an optimist and a contrarian, based not on personality, but arithmetic. Markets spend most of their time trending on average in one direction or the other after turning points emerge. Those of us who find bull markets more pleasant and profitable than bear markets are in search of a turning-point. We have been conditioned to at least anticipate the end of a directional move before a major reversal to a new one. This makes sense because turning points occur when there is a dramatic difference between buyers and sellers in their transaction volumes When this happens an emotional low or high point is reached, although an actual low or high often happens on a different day with materially less volume. Historically, lows and highs are tested at least once, if not multiple times, without establishing new highs and lows. This week was not such a turning point in my opinion.


The Week Ended Friday the 13th of May

On the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), 47% of the stock listed reached a new low. Similarly on NASDAQ, 49% reached a new low. Perhaps more convincingly, the volume of declining prices was about twice that of rising prices on the NYSE (16.6 million vs 7.9 million); whereas on the NASDAQ it was about three times (15.0 million vs 5.1 million). The plurality of the selling was more dramatic than the indices dominated by large caps. (Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) -6.36%, S&P 500 -2.41%, and NASDAQ Composite -2.8%). Perhaps the relative performance of mutual funds reflects the extremes of fund shareholders’ fears. The best performing large sector was US Treasury Funds, with the weakest being Precious Metals Funds.


Intermediate-Term Outlook

Prices, interest rates, and yields reflect participant feelings about current levels and their impact on future results. The Producer Price Index (PPI) read +15.68%, the JOC Industrial Price Index +9.47% (already starting to fall), the Consumer Price Index (CPI) +8.24%, Inflation 4.21%, and the Broker Call Loan rate 2.75%. What could be more indicative are fund flows into Chinese domestic funds, which almost doubled this last quarter from their 2nd quarter in 2021 (816 billion RMB vs. 456 billion RMB).  

Other concerns include the S&P 500 declining for the first four months of the year, as most of the time the remaining 8 months cannot break even for the year. For some time market capitalization has provided a good clue to stock price performance, presumably because the large-caps are more liquid. However, when analyzing fund performance by market capitalization this week, there does not appear to be any appreciable difference in year-to-date performance.


Longer-Term Concerns

Secretary Yellen is pushing a minimum global corporate tax, part of the redistribution effort in the US and an effort to destroy sovereignty. Our contacts in Washington suggest these proposals will have difficulty passing the US Senate. The mere fact that it is being proposed generates a market and economic negative that worries some.


Initial Thoughts About the New Bull Market

As usual, I am premature in thinking about the future. Because it takes me a long time to research and make up my mind, I need all the time and help I can get from subscribers and others. Below are a few briefs of my thoughts, which I hope will spark a response.

  • Service companies look to be better than goods companies due to the limited amount of talent available. This will lead to favorable pricing.
  • Invest in countries and people that are honest, save, and are believers in a practical education.
  • Invest in technology that uses new ways to solve problems.


Please share your thoughts now, even though we probably have considerable time before the new bull market comes. The new bull market will probably be led by other names than the old.

 


Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/05/havent-found-bottom-yet-investments.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/05/three-worries-april-near-term-slowdown.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/04/short-long-term-thoughts-weekly-blog-729.html



Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.


Sunday, September 26, 2021

Two Confessions - Weekly Blog # 700

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Two Confessions


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




First, I have not sufficiently considered the world’s losses from our latest global war on COVID-19 and its follow-ons. As with any war it is easy to identify those who have died, but more difficult to identify those whose lives have been upended, particularly the psychologically walking-wounded. It is also too early to understand the likely impact on most of human life in terms of education, travel, commerce, real estate, and most importantly health. We can never entirely go back to the way we were. I need to figure out how the changes will impact those that I care for professionally and personally.

Second, at the instance of crafting my 700th blog, I should confess that I am not an original thinker or first mover. As a perpetual student of investing, it is my task to learn from the past and apply those lessons to present and perhaps future problems. In thinking about this mission it occurred to me that, much as I used to think that I was inventive, I am a product of my family. I owe it to all who may choose to use some of my thoughts expressed in these blogs, that much of my thinking results from my understanding of the actions of three generations of my family's focus on investments. At the end of this long blog you will see how I apply the experiences of the  past to the current market and investing for the future.

One of our long-term subscribers, with a background in management and data management practices, has just published a  book of poems. One of them has to do with his efforts to pass on his successful investment views to his family. Barry Faith has given me permission to republish his views below, showing him to be a kindred soul:

HELPING

A strong purpose in my life is investment in the future, and a key part of that is to have values that are passed down the generations.

Helping with our family Is the way I want to be.

Helping them to build and grow, Helping us to reap and sow.

With each passing generation So we build our family nation, Parent to child and so on

Long time after I am gone.

So set the ethos, live the creed, Create the thoughts, do the deed.  Build for those yet to be born,

To that end let us all be sworn.

© Barry Faith April 2014


If you want to only see my investment insights without the historic background, go to the section titled "Current Views".


The Three Arthurs

At the beginning of the 20th century my grandfather moved from Philadelphia to become a member of the New York Stock Exchange. Over time with partners, he built a "carriage-trade" retail "wire-house" to serve both wealthy Americans  overseas and locals investing in US stocks. The firm opened offices in London, onboard ocean liners, and elsewhere. (The London office was the first of three to bear our name. It was followed many years later by my brother's and my own firm. Through the years five Lipper firms were members of the NYSE. These firms were never headed by a son or younger brother succeeding the founder. This  history may be why I believe generational succession is difficult to pull off. The younger generation is not a copy of the older generation.) My grandfather's firm developed a reputation for being an honest broker, acting as an agent, never as principal. There was no market making and no underwriting. While there were other brokers who were honest, he was referred to among his clients as “the honest broker”)

The next Lipper firm was my father as an independent floor broker. Although he never really liked that role, he enjoyed  daily backgammon or gin rummy with other members of the lunch club. A few of the lunch club participants became his friends. He was not a student of anything, let alone the market, but he learned who were smart and trustworthy on the exchange floor. Through one of these people he bought stock in an electronic connector company that surprised me. At the time I was a junior a junior electronics analyst, looking deeper than he did. The key to the stock was a smart group of Texans being the dominant shareholders. They had the company open manufacturing plants in Puerto Rico and enjoyed a ten-year federal tax holiday.  (I learned that tax management was a skill that could provide benefits, something not taught to in my Colombia University Security Analysis courses. This lesson was later applied to an accidental holding in Apple.)

The third Arthur is my brother, now living in California. He is the single most creative person I know. His career on Wall Street started as a way for him to return to Japan, where he experienced very happy "R&R" leave as a US Marine serving in Korea during the Conflict. He developed into a successful institutional salesman, selling his own statistical research and some very good fundamental research developed by his partner. Arthur's greatest skill was putting himself in the client's position and seeing ways to improve their business results,  a skill greatly appreciated in the offshore fund market. I created a new NYSE member firm to serve these clients. I was later asked to join the firm to develop research for a broader universe. To support his clients' needs he opened offices in London, Geneva, Tokyo, and Buenos Aires, while I open a small research office in Washington DC. Some research work was done in each office, which I tried to coordinate. The Washington office was the first brokerage research office in D.C., where we focused on how the present and contemplated        actions of the federal government impacted individual securities. (As with tax management, the impact of government actions were not taught in Security Analysis courses. Today, these two aspects may be more important than quarterly earnings estimates.) After the economics of the brokerage commission business changed in 1968, Arthur closed the firm in 1971. Later, his former chief trader talked him into starting a new institutional trading firm.

No family history of people influencing my thinking would be complete without acknowledging two remarkable women, as well as the legal profession on my mother's side. The  lawyers were involved with wills and trusts, as well as the proper  administration of them.

The first remarkable woman was the original's Arthur's wife, who really cared about people and arranged lavish but tasteful entertainment. She was often referred to as her husband's best salesperson. For many years at family dinners there was a widow of a late former busted client of the firm. Though her position was significantly reduced, she was treated with great dignity. (The lesson was to recognize one's own good fortune by taking care of other individuals who through no  fault of their own were less fortunate.)

The second remarkable woman was my mother, who did not attend college but was able to be a critical assistant to Wendel Wilke during his second attempt to be the Republican Presidential nominee. She was later active in committees to support The Marshall Plan, the United Nations, and some other Democratic issues. I believe she was also helpful in getting my brother an appointment as a page in the US Senate, a life changing experience for him. She was what my grandfather    called a "joiner", giving help and assistance to many causes. (This may be why I felt somewhat comfortable joining both The  New York Society of Security Analysts and the International Society of Exchange Executives Emeriti, eventually taking leadership roles. These roles prepared me for sitting on Caltech's and The Stevens Institute boards, as well as the Columbia University Medical Center Board of Advisors. While I may have been helpful to these organizations, I learned a great deal concerning the  politics of non-profits during a turnover of leadership and surrounding conditions.)


Current Views

Caveats: The most consistent product of the investment cycle is humility. The surviving veterans are mostly humble and will talk of their errors with me. I have made mistakes in the past, including some I may not recognize. My goal is to recognize mistakes more quickly and rectify them.


Popular Comments:

The US Stock Market has been in a narrow trading range for most of the year. Examining the numbers and dates enables one to see a more complex picture. The closing 2021 low for the S&P 500 was on January 4th, for the Dow Jones Industrial Average on January 29th, and for the NASDAQ Composite on March 8th. The different dates suggest there are at least three different stock markets going on. I believe the differences are not accidental and meaningful in terms of changing market structure.

The DJIA is a retail measure, not because retail investors invest in “The Dow”. But due to the time pressure on the electronic media and the reduced news hole in local papers in smaller markets and in the “fly over” portion of the country. The S&P 500 is the favorite of institutions with large amounts of money and limited staff, as well as former brokers now stylized as “wealth managers”. The last group are now freed from anti-churning rules designed to prevent them from trading to generate brokerage commissions. Although they now charge account fees, they are conscious that they need to be seen as active to earn their fees, particularly with new managed accounts customers. (Later in this blog I suggest lower turnover rates are favorable, especially for taxable accounts.) Wealth managers are particularly fond of ETFs and my guess is that this is the reason Equity ETFs recently suffered net outflows of $20 billion compared to the larger and more long-term oriented mutual fund net redemptions of $2 billion. I believe this is a major cause of the volatility expressed in the S&P 500.

Of the domestic market indices, my favorite is the NASDAQ composite. Most passive money is invested in stocks that predominate the S&P 500. There is relatively little wealth management money invested in the NASDAQ, particularly outside of the high-volume, NASDAQ listed, FAANG stocks, e.g., Apple. Why is this important? For the last several years the NASDAQ has led the other two market indices, going both up and down. A week ago, all three markets dropped, opening a major gap in prices. This week, the gap was barely closed by the rising prices of the other two markets, but not the NASDAQ. Market analysts believe a gap must be closed before a change in direction is confirmed. My view is to watch the NASDAQ for future market direction.


Wrong Treasury Message

Traditionally, most stock and bond markets around the world are priced off the market for US Treasuries. The yields on treasuries have not risen, not even in response to the Chair of the Federal Reserve as he reads the inflationary outlook, which during this Presidents term will be 5%. Despite this and the probability of larger deficits, foreigners are heavy buyers of US paper. To me this suggests much of the outlook outside of the US is not favorable.


The Pundits March in Wrong Direction

In analyzing successful investments over long-periods of time for taxable investors, there are four keys to investment success. They are in order of importance:

1. Terminal Price

2. Period Held

3. Purchase Price

4. Present Market

In the next pitch of a pundit/sales assistant, count the words spent on each of the four and you will generate a useful reliability ratio compared to others.


Personal Outlook and Plans

Because of my trading genius, I expect there will be a 10% drop soon after a purchase. Within a decade of purchase, a 25% decline is reasonable. Over 25 years or a generation, a fall of 50% could happen. What to do? If you refer to the four indicators mentioned above, the two highest haven’t changed, nor the purchase price, leaving only the present market indicator. As it is the least important, I recommend holding until fundamental information of structural change appears.

My current plan is to think through possible major changes and examine companies, sectors, and strategies I haven’t in the past. Suggestions are welcome. 

  



Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/09/observations-prior-to-excitement-weekly.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/09/3-thoughts-to-ponder-weekly-blog-698.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/09/uncertainty-is-inevitable-weekly-blog.html




Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.


Sunday, June 13, 2021

To Benefit Long Term Investors: Invert Punditry - Weekly Blog # 685

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


To Benefit Long Term Investors: Invert Punditry


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




Pay Attention to Word Count

Notice the number of words one is besieged with by the media concerning the current economy and market. Investment marketers take their cues from the media to pitch their wares, aggrandizing their pitches to focus favorably on easy markets. These marketers convince the “corner office” that expensive marketing efforts, focused on the relatively short periods used by pundits, reward portfolio managers and other investment staff. Would you believe that the investment efforts would be directed toward managing portfolios to achieve good results in the time periods favored by the pundits? 

One indication of the market power of pundit soundbites is the weekly sample survey conducted by the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). They ask their weekly sample if they have a bullish, bearish, or neutral market performance outlook over the next six months and most of the time their views represent those of the loudest pundits. Professional market analysts consider the trend of their predictions a contrary indicator, like odd-lot transactions at turning points used in the past. Statistically, they are extrapolations of current trends, or what politicians call “the big Mo”, or momentum. Only half the number are bearish vs. bullish in this week’s reading, which probably tracks the word count published by pundits. This extreme ratio, or higher, is often found at significant turning points.  

Focusing on this week’s information I examined the amount of attention pundits paid to these factors, as well as the lessons learned. (Lessons learned are in parentheses.) The purpose of this exercise is to suggest our subscribers do a somewhat similar exercise using personal inputs and lessons, perhaps sharing them with this group.


Current Inputs

On Friday, Moody’s reached a record high price of 19 times its original cost in our private financial services fund. (To offset the fixed income cycle Moody’s is successfully developing other products and services, both organically and through careful global acquisitions. These are being recognized by the market.)

More than half of net flows into mutual funds and ETFs are going into money market funds. In May, $19 Billion went into these funds paying low interest rates, while Tech sector funds experienced net outflows of $5.8 billion. (Investors are choosing to invest in cash, accepting the twin risks of inflation and a two-month decline of -2.4% in the value of the US dollar in April and May.) The decline in ten-year US Treasuries yields is primarily due to foreign buyers seeking to take advantage of relatively high US yields, even after currency hedges.


Longer Term Views of Top Fund Managers

Two of the largest mutual fund management companies serving both individual and institutional investors, Capital Group (American Funds) and T. Rowe Price, recently sent reports to investors and distributors urging them to hold through the coming market decline. The historic bases of these groups are slightly different, American Funds being historically focused on their growth & income load funds and T. Rowe Price their no-load growth funds. Both have sound records and now offer domestic and international vehicles to a global marketplace. 


Summarizing their well written views:

Capital Group emphasizes the cyclicality of the market and the danger of jumping out during a decline. They demonstrate the negative impact on long-term performance resulting from being out of the market on the ten worst days during major declines. Most periods of decline are short relative to those of rising markets. (The one exception, using my words, “the second FDR depression”, immediately followed the prior depression, March 6, 1937, to April 28, 1942. This is important to me, as the Biden or third Obama term looks to FDR as a model. They could be right.)

T. Rowe Price lists the following concerns: nearing peak economic levels, rising inflation, higher taxes, central bank mistakes, and increasing geopolitical concerns. Perhaps the one distinguishing difference between the two firms is T. Rowe Price having public shareholders, including us. Consequently, they may be more sensitive to investor sentiment trends.

One risk that should be added to the worry list is the current younger generation of leveraged traders losing a lot of money, which seems inevitable. It will give politicians an opportunity to impose more draconian regulations, which will likely raise the costs of investing and reduce opportunities, for a while.


Our Own Holdings

As a student of successful wealthy families in numerous countries, I have been impressed by the concentration of wealth in a relatively small number of long-term investments. To an important degree, these traits have been my personal model as well. The success of this strategy comes from the appreciating long-term holdings becoming a larger portion of the total portfolio, more than offsetting the inevitable losers. The following is a brief discussion of four significant winners and why I acquired them. 

  1. S&P Global, formerly McGraw Hill, was purchased in 1977 because I did not wish to be embarrassed. (At the time I was the chairman of the program committee of the New York Society of Securities Analyst. I was blessed with having a strong committee, one of whom was the leading analysts covering McGraw Hill, which appeared to be too complex. Our solution was for the first time to devote one full day to one company, going through each of their major parts. I didn’t know the company and was concerned that I would embarrass the NYSSA and myself by asking a dumb question, so I bought a few shares of the stock. Luckily for all concerned the meeting was a success and lucky for me I continue to hold those shares, which have produced a return of 35,810%. The lessons from this are, do the right thing for your perceived responsibilities to others and it is good to be lucky.)
  2. Another example of being fortunate happened when I purchased a few shares in an innovative closed-end fund. It was one of the very first funds, managed by Eaton Vance, to own private equities along with publicly traded stocks. The private equities were selected by the venture capital group of the Rockefeller family. For regulatory purposes it was later determined that these investments were inappropriate for a closed end fund due to the difficulty in ascertaining current values. Consequently, the partnership with the venture group was dissolved and the fund holders were paid in kind. That was how I had happened to get a few very cheap shares in Apple. By late 1999 I realized the potential of Apple and consciously bought more shares. The combined Apple holdings have gained 21,735 % over cost. (The lesson being, when things happen study the opportunity.)
  3. Not all my long-term holdings started with luck, some actually showed analytical skill or the recognition of missing skills. In 1985 my investments were quite limited, as all my time was spent developing Lipper Analytical Services into what became a premier institutional global analytical firm producing analyses on the fund business. Nevertheless, I was conscious of a need to build an investment portfolio. That was when I bought a few shares in Berkshire Hathaway. (The critical lessons that drove this purchase were a recognition that casualty insurance, particularly reinsurance, was difficult to understand and buying holding companies was a separate skill set. Based on this self-analyses it was not difficult to select the right investment, Berkshire Hathaway. The gains from that purchase are 28,393%. Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett’s skills have been extraordinary.)
  4. The final successful long-term investment, bought in 1987, is now the stock of Morgan Stanley. The original purchase was Eaton Vance, the innovative fund management company previously mentioned. I believed that as a peddler to my fund clients I should be able to see the world through their eyes. For an old Boston based investment counsel firm they were involved with originating innovative products and services. For many years this trait produced good results but it has not done so recently. Because my original reason for buying the stock was to see the world as my clients do, I was not surprised that they sold out at a good price to Morgan Stanley. From the original purchase the appreciation has been 2,247%. (The critical lesson is, to leave the battlefield successfully we must recognize when the game has evolved from one in which we have superior skills to a new one that we are less equipped to win.)


Two More History Lessons

Ben Franklin left $2,000 in his will to help young tradesmen in the cities of Boston and Philadelphia. For 200 years only the income could be spent. By 1990 the balance after expenditures for scholarships, women’s health, help for firefighters and disabled children had grown to $6.5 million. In many ways Ben Franklin was the smartest of our Founding Fathers. (Two critical lessons: the power of compound interest and delaying the spending of principal as long as possible.)

In looking at the share of the world’s GDP from 1500 to the present time there are only two countries that approach 40% of the total, China and the US. China peaked around 1820 and the US around 1950. China is growing again, but the US is not.  WE SHOULD NOT IGNORE THIS, particularly in terms of education and discipline. 




Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/06/history-good-lessons-not-great.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/05/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings_30.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/05/faulty-comparisons-weekly-blog-682.html




Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.


Sunday, February 23, 2020

HATE DOESN’T WORK FOR INVESTORS - Weekly Blog # 617



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

HATE DOESN’T WORK FOR INVESTORS

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



Few if any investors like the current market, where on relatively low volume volatility has picked up, particularly intraday. This suggests that the stock market is dominated by relatively few traders with strong views. To the extent that bonds and credit instruments are sought to provide reasonable income, investors are finding current yields unattractive. The continued increase in demand for fixed income suggests that yield is not a driver. Some investors, perhaps counseled by investment advisors, suggest that bonds and credit instruments will be a safe port in the anticipated coming equity storm. The growth of corporate and individual debt, plus the deficit spending by most of the developed world, suggests there will be something of credit crunch. This may surprise holders of fixed income securities when they see an increase in the volatility of prices.

Nevertheless, people are being driven by “hate” of stock price volatility. While this blog is intended to deal with investments, it recognizes the environmental background influencing the decision process for some investors. If they can hate certain political leaders, geographies, foods, and sports teams, why can’t they hate certain investments?

Years ago, there was a very successful Broadway production and movie titled “Damn Yankees”. It was the story of a long-suffering former Washington Senators baseball fan whose team could never seem to defeat the New York Yankees, preventing them from getting into the World Series. His solution was to do a deal with the Devil, which enabled him to become a baseball player “phenom” for almost a full season. He led the Senators to victories right down to the last play in the last game, when suddenly the Devil’s magic wore off. He returned to his former state as a middle-aged lamenting fan as the Senators never learned to play better or get better players. (The losing team eventually left Washington and over the years were replaced by a new team using the old beloved name. Readers can make up their own minds whether this myth should be applied to the Senators working on Capitol Hill.)

Apple (*), Tesla, Microsoft (**), and perhaps Amazon are stocks that some investors have “hated” at various points in time. Historically, this has been a mistake for the following reasons:
  1. The most important thing about any stock or bond is its price. The physical and intellectual scrape value may be worth a substantial premium.
  2. In many cases there are good people in failed companies who have learned from their experiences. They now provide substantial help to others, some of which are winners.
  3. The downfall of the hated may well be due to improvement in the opposition.
  4. The nature of competition may have changed, benefiting the hated. (Microsoft and Apple are good examples)
  5. Internally, hated leadership can change.  
(*) Owned in personal and managed accounts.
(**) Owned in funds utilized in managed fund portfolios.)

Once again, we urge investors to sub-divide their portfolios into slices of expected payments needs. Earlier payment periods should have less equity and more low-yield, money market fund type investments. Periods beyond ten years outside of opportunity reserves should be equity oriented, particularly legacy accounts. Payment slices in the five-year range should have at least 50% invested in risk products at all times.

To avoid falling into the “hate” trap, make a list of three positives and more negatives.

Question? Have your “hated” investment opportunities cost you?



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/02/investment-losses-can-be-prots-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-art-of-portfolio-construction.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/02/significant-turnaround-two-fearful.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Winning Investment Strategies Shrinking - Weekly Blog # 608


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Winning Investment Strategies Shrinking

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



Premise: Winners are not Good Teachers
In the Northern Hemisphere this is the season where sports fans look forward to identifying the best team to crown as champion of their league. They celebrate the stars that did exceptionally well, but because we don’t like to pick on those that are down, we avoid focusing on the players that performed badly. This highlights the difference between a good sports or investment analyst and one likely to perform poorly in the future. As a contrarian I believe I learn far more from the mistakes of previously competent players than the exceptional winners.

Matter of fact, most winners owe their success to the mistakes made by others, something that is certainly true in military history. Many competitors try to model themselves after recently crowned champions,  but more often than not those who study a broader list of mistakes made by individuals, and their managements will be on the way to becoming future champions. (General George Washington was one who learned from early battle losses.)

Applying Lessons to Professional Investment Battles
Since every investor starts with some cash and perhaps some borrowing capability, all investments and investors are in competition. Most choose to stay in the middle of the pack rather than venturing out to the extremes. Nevertheless, it is not what a single investor or a single investment does, it is what others do that determines the absolute and relative profitability of the decision.

Why is this? It has to do with what is called the weight of money. (A lesson I learned from the real investment professionals at Fidelity.) Prices don’t move on the basis of brain power or information, but on the size of the flows into and out of investments. (This is the fundamental basis behind technical or market analysis.)

Flows follow Performance
Brains don’t move prices, conviction as measured by the size or the weight of money behind the flows do. No one is required to sign an affidavit as to why we do anything, it’s what we do and with what size or force. In viewing different asset classes we can see that the lack of  money going into commodities and some elements of real estate has led to flows into some equities and somewhat indiscriminately to fixed income.

Excessive Flows are Often Late
As with most investment rules and policies they can be taken to an extreme, which might be viewed as an antidote to the weight of money argument. One critical element of flows is who the sellers are at various prices, or for fixed income securities, yields. In many cases the sellers are more disciplined than the buyers. Owners of fixed income products are initially interested in current yield, but those like pension plans are also focused on the reinvestment of their interest payment receipts. When rates are too low they may decide to exit the fixed income asset class with their profits and explore total return vehicles, largely equity-oriented investments.

In the third quarter, worldwide equity funds had net redemptions of $3 billion, bond funds net inflows of $271 billion, and money-market funds net inflows of $311 billion. The smarter sellers may be speaking, especially if you consider that interest rates are among the lowest in 500 years, before the inflation caused by the discovery of South American gold. Even though rates are low, the yield curve is becoming a bit steeper. Currently, the thirty-year US Treasury yield is 2.35%, which may be the “market’s” guess of the long-term inflation rate. Some escapees from high-quality fixed income and some nervous equity investors are congregating in high yield paper/funds. Moody’s (*) has expressed their concern after rising prices in this category, fearing an increase in problems for future issuers.

(*) A position in our Private Financial Services Fund)

All is not Great in the Domestic Equity Arena
  1. The US dollar’s rate of exchange is softening, making foreign investments more attractive. 
  2. Too much attention is being paid to the S&P 500, which year-to-date is producing a return north of 30%, including reinvested dividends. What is not being noticed is the significant number of stocks producing lower returns, particularly the value-oriented and industrial company stocks found in many portfolios. The latter dealing with lackluster sales and weakening prices. 
  3. Low interest rates are allowing companies that should close to limp along and depress prices. 
  4. The very volatile American Association of Individual Investors sample survey, a contrarian indicator, showed 44% of investors being bullish vs. 20.5% bearish. (Most readings are in a 20-40% range.)
  5. The oldest Central Bank in the world has given up using negative interest rates. Sweden, a very respected central bank, is now no longer one of the few negative interest rate users. I suspect some central banks and investment people with a knowledge of history see higher rates in their future, perhaps much higher.
A useful set of indicators
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) currently trades 3,099 issues and the NASDAQ 3,466. Historically the NYSE had more stringent listing standards, so on balance it has older and higher perceived quality. Both had 47 issues that were unchanged last week. The NYSE had 2.6% of its stocks hit new lows, whereas the NASDAQ had 20% hit new lows. The NASDAQ Composite has gained +38% this year and the DJIA +25%. On average the NASDAQ attracts more active traders than the senior exchange and thus may better reflect sentiment.



Question of the week: When was the last time you looked at your fixed income investments with the same scrutiny as you do your stock investments?



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/12/faulty-decision-processes-at-change.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/12/investors-are-worrying-about-wrong.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/11/contrarian-stock-and-bond-fund-choices.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.