Is This The Week That Ends Instability? - Weekly Blog # 924

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Is This The Week That Ends Instability?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 Preface

I believe it was Lenin who said there are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen. Possibly, the four-day trading week beginning this coming Tuesday is such a period. In both the Financial Times and her podcast, Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab* introduced the concept of the period we are going through as an extended period of instability. I am suggesting it is possible the beginning of the end of this period may have begun.

*Shares held in in managed and personal accounts.

 

Fund Data Sets the Table

Whether one invests in mutual funds or not, one should recognize that not only do many people invest in them, but more importantly, many fund managers get their training at fund shops. Thus, one can get an understanding of the institutional mind set by looking at fund data. In the five years ended last Thursday, the London Stock Exchange Group published my old firm’s weekly study of 105 equity related mutual fund peer-groups average performances.

 

The average performance of S&P 500 Index funds was 14.05% compounded for the past five years.  There were only five peer group averages that were better: Precious Metals Equity Funds +21.50%, Energy MLP Funds +20.79%, Commodities Precious Metals Funds +18.75%, Natural Resources Funds +17.30%, and Global Natural Resources Funds +16.05%.  There were just two better performing thematic categories, precious metals and energy. The narrowness of performance leadership proves how difficult it was to pick winners for the past five years. The leadership crown was indeed unstable.

 

Another way to identify the instability in economic data is to examine the tails of the best and worst 2 items shown in Saturday’s WSJ weekly price chart. The best was Silver +11.67% and the second best was the KOPSI +5.55%. The second worst price performance was Financials -2.33%, which was half as bad as Corn -4.71%, the worst performer. The gaps between the top two leaders and laggards suggest concentration is at play.

 

Turning Points Possible Next Week

On Tuesday, probably in the late afternoon, SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the US) is expected to announce its decision on the IEEPA tariff. The President has said he is prepared for an unfavorable ruling and has substitute measures in mind. At best this will be disruptive, and possibly inflationary. The ECRI industrial price index, which is normally slow moving, rose to 120.49% from the prior week’s level of 117.42%.

 

Markets are anticipating problems, either from Tariffs or possibly Iran. Sixty-two percent of the stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rose last week, while only fifty-three percent rose on the NASDAQ. The NASDAQ trades more tech stocks and the shares of younger companies. Thus, the junior exchange is likely to react more than the “Big Board” to news events. Retail investors, when not gambling, are more active on the junior market. One possible measure of this is the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey, which reported 49.5% bullish for the next six months, up from 42.5% the prior week. What may be more significant is the 28.2% that were bearish. Many professional traders believe “the public” is wrong at turning points.

 

The Davos meeting begins Tuesday, with many political and economic leaders present and chatting. One doesn’t know what will be discussed and how meaningful the meetings will be.

 

Keep us Informed as to any Changes in Your Views.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: How Much Longer Can We Avoid Thinking About the Long-Term? - Weekly Blog # 923

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data May Be Signaling Change - Weekly Blog # 922

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Time Horizon Should Pick How You Measure the Results - Weekly Blog # 921

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

 

 

Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural - Weekly Blog # 909

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Risks: Recession/Cyclical, Depression/Structural

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Fears

Recessions are a cyclical phenomenon, largely due to price and debt imbalances. They occur regularly within a ten-to-twenty-year period. Subsequent recoveries are usually as quick as recessions. Depressions are much rarer, leaving societies changed and altering the distribution of wealth and power.

 

Based on elapsed time the world is due a recession, which may have already started. Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab points out that the US Government tracks the profitability of both public and private companies. In both the first and second quarters of 2025 earnings declined. She believes that when data for the third quarter comes out it will be below trend. This may be different than more publicly reported GDP results because the wholesale sector is absorbing the bulk of the costs of the tariffs which foreign exporters don’t pick up.

 

There are lots of private indicators of economic business troubles. One that has been around a long time is the production of boxes, which declined. A new one to me is the trading multiples on the sale of trucking companies, which I have been told dropped in the first half of this year. This is important because it not only indicates a decline in the demand for goods, but it is a signal that they are having difficulty getting experienced drivers. Many drivers are on expiring or expired visas, demonstrating the impact of tightening regulations on many business activities.

 

Below the surface other concerns are becoming more visible. One can’t avoid a discussion of what AI (Artificial Intelligence) will do for global industry and consumption. While a lot of money and talent is being spent under this rubric, there are still no identified profits or sales from its use. In a recent study by MIT, they found a low return on AI’s use. From an overall economic viewpoint, I have not seen a study showing if AI’s replacement of the work of people benefits society.

 

With relatively small changes in price and debt levels there will be a recovery from the recession. However, every couple of generations those responsible for curing recessions believe the quickest solution is structural, which society rejects over an extended period.

 

My Fear

We have all heard that history does not repeat, but rhymes. My fear is that we are generally following a pattern like the 1920s and early 1930s, which led to the Great Depression. (You’ll recognize the term depression more from the study of psychology than economics.)

 

The US has suffered numerous recessions, most of which were in the one-two year range. For a recession to become a depression there needs a force trying to fix how society and the economy work. Unfortunately, previous commanded decisions didn’t work and prolonged the impact of the recession. Over our history we have had four presidents who have tried to make meaningful changes to our society/economy: Andrew Jackson, Teddy Rosevelt, FDR, and Trump. Through executive orders and legislation these Presidents tried to change how people lived and worked but ran into significant opposition from the courts and elements of the business community. Because of the US’s market and military power, we have an impact on what other nations do. They either resist or go along with the strategy but will be impacted either way.

 

What should Investors do?

This advice is for long-term investors looking to make returns for future generations. Traders who invest to make relatively fast returns should follow the momentum of the markets, while investors should move slowly with portions of their wealth and responsibilities.

 

Each will be subject to the cyclical behavior of the market, world economy, and changes in needs. While a trader may guess correctly regarding cyclical moves and early structural changes, an investor should wait for some understanding of the major implications of the change and be willing to be wrong before being right.

 

Whatever discussions occur today, they will likely be different a year from now. Major differences will result from views on the 2028 election.

 

Odds

These are my analog thoughts that lack the precision of digital work, but that is the way I feel very early on Sunday morning:

• The odds of a recession before the next Presidential election appear to be 65%.
• In dealing with a recession, the odds of government converting it into a depression is 50%, although it may take longer. Human nature almost guarantees future recessions and depressions due to over expansion of debt and other unsustainable commitments.

 

As usual, please let me know what you are thinking.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Tactical Headlines Show Strategic Clues - Weekly Blog # 908

Mike Lipper's Blog: Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not - Weekly Blog # 907

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Investors, Politicians, & Other Children - Weekly Blog # 745

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Investors, Politicians, & Other Children

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

    

 

 

Most investors, politicians, and other children act as if they are the only people that have had to deal with behavioral challenges. However, there is very little in life that is totally new, only the packaging has changed.

 

For example, how should one measure progress, and should it cause action? Most of us have some level of confidence in reported numbers, although numbers are an abstraction of a reality, not reality itself.

 

We are all counters from an early age, and since tradeable money was created have tended to count many of our successes and occasional failures in monetary terms.

 

The problem is the value of money is in the eyes of the beholder. One hundred million Confederate dollars has very little, if any value today.

 

Those dollar bills were on the losing side of a painful war, but we have been on the losing side of an age-old battle since birth. That depreciating value is called inflation.

 

The crux of the problem is the creator of this vehicle of exchange is also one of its largest users. Furthermore, the ruler of the mint or printing press is in a position of strength due to support from the right people. The easiest way to keep their loyalty is to pay them. In imperial Rome it was called “bread and circuses”.

 

In many Roman cities and towns, the amphitheater was larger than the nearby fortress. These were the entertainment centers for the populace who had enough food to eat due to an efficient agricultural system with well-engineered aqueducts.

 

I find it revealing that today’s name for giving money indirectly to the population is derived from a Latin word for stimulus. In earlier days it was called a bribe.

 

When a long-distant trader, Marco Polo, worked along the long Silk Road (1271-1295), the most advanced society was the Chinese empire. It developed gun powder and later developed paper money. Not surprisingly the empire had a large government, with examinations for jobs.

 

From my standpoint, smuggling silkworms back to Europe created a market-based exchange with a sounder form of money, especially when compared to their traditionally weakened currency. This is the way he delt with inflation.

 

In the thirteenth century the Europeans were somewhat protected against inflation due to small indigenous silver mines whose content went into their currency. This lasted into the next century and was replaced by gold and silver produced at low wages in Latin America, starting about 200 years of inflation.

 

When the steady stream of gold dried up the overseas colonies of England and other European countries became too expensive to maintain without substantial taxes. This is the reason a political group in England was not disappointed with the result of The American Revolution.

 

Confidence in the Future is Low

There are a plethora of signs showing this lack of a defined future:

• What are yields on US Treasuries saying? 2-year Treasuries are yielding 3.25%, 10-year Treasuries 2.84%, and 30-year Treasuries 3.07%. The 2-year is inverted relative to the 10 and 30-years!!

•  All 3 of the AAII survey predictions for the next 6 months are in the 30-39 % range.

• While 53% of the DJIA companies were winners for the week, the DJIA lost value in aggregate points. By comparison, only 40% of the companies in the Transportation index were winners.

 

• The JOC-ECRI industrial price index dropped 5.15% year over year.

 

• Exchange traded equity funds continued to suffer redemptions, led by growth and value funds.

 

• Liz Ann Sonders, the highly respected chief strategist from Charles Schwab is not bullish because she has not seen the market capitulate, as would normally be the case near the end of a bear market.

 

My Views

I have been searching for reasons to be optimistic for our long-term investment accounts, as after every bear market there is a bull market.

 

I agree with Richard Bernstein that bull markets don’t start with narrow leadership.

 

I believe economic and market cycles are not just number exercises, which you might be led to believe after reading columns from the various pundits.

 

I believe cycles are critically needed to address severe imbalances, not just trading opportunities. In previous blogs I have listed troubling demographics quality of schooling, healthcare, military strength, and leadership.

 

As I do not see these imbalances being addressed, I am afraid we will experience one or more recessions. There is a popular hope we will avoid a recognized recession, or only suffer a mild one.

 

If that were to happen, it would not likely sufficiently address our problems. I have no doubt our politicians can continue to produce a smoke screen to hide the issues. The current proposed legislation is an example of this, almost guaranteeing a major recession in a couple of years.

 

If that were to happen, much like during Paul Volcker’s tenure where he had two recessions, there would be substantial risk of a needed recession with very high interest rates.

 

I look forward to a new bull market with some answers to our problems, even after that experience. Our families will need one.

 

Please comment.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/weather-market-economic-and-political.html

 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/beware-of-cheap-seek-fair-slowly-weekly.html

 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/time-to-be-contrary-weekly-blog-741.html

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

  

Pick Investment Period & Strategy - Weekly Blog # 737

                                    

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Pick Investment Period & Strategy

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

This is the 737th blog which shares my thoughts on different investment periods and strategies. They are different from each other and are partly triggered by Friday’s US stock market decline, which in the extreme took 10% off the average price of narrow industry groups.  The views expressed are for the beginnings of internal discussions, not final conclusions which I would be happy to discuss.

Last Week

The 8:30 am Consumer Price Index (CPI) shocked some market participants, but really shouldn’t have shocked those who’ve visited retail locations. From the opening bell until the close stock prices fell. A significant price gap developed between Thursday’s close and Friday’s prices. Most of the time, significant price gaps are closed in subsequent trading before a change in direction continues.

Bullish traders could be overjoyed by Friday’s price action, which showed a considerable increase in volume. They will look at the result as a successful test of an earlier low price.

During the coming week the Federal Reserve will have a regularly scheduled rate setting committee meeting. Prior to Friday’s price decline it was generally expected to be a 50-basis point interest rate increase. This may happen, although the key for the market is not the rate but the issued statement. Some think the market move may scare the Fed into raising rates higher or lower and could also change the announcement related to cutting assets on the balance sheet. 

Market analysts are focused on the price level of the S&P 500 (SPX), whose prior low point was in the low 3800 level. If it were to be breached, a “bear-market” would be called. Some believe the ultimate SPX decline could be in the 3000-3500 range,

Hopefully, what transpires doesn’t mirror Boeing’s launch of an essentially brand-new plane following their very successful 737. Early on, the new plane had some crashes.

July Numbers Difficult to Interpret

• Market sentiment was largely positive in the first half of June, then turned negative in the middle of the month.
• Interest rates on non-government paper rose as retail sales dropped.
• Government numbers focused on a middle of the month week and probably didn’t fully recognize the deterioration of conditions.
• If the very current sentiment continues, I expect the reports for June, published in mid-July, to show a further decline in sales and a gain in inflation.
• If the second quarter GDP is like the first quarter, it will be the second consecutive quarter of contraction, the definition of a recession. 
• For the latest week, six of the ten commodity rail-carload groups showed declines: Other -15.4%, Metallic Ores and Metals -13.5%, Petroleum and Petroleum Products -7.6%, Farm Product and Food -5.6%, Forrest Products -2.9%, and Coal -2.0%. Total Intermodal -4.4% and Total Traffic -2.8%. (As these represent sales to customers, they denote current market activity not building inventory by the producers.)
• The level of interest rates in part deals with expectations. Thus, read what Randy Forsyth in the current Barron’s wrote. “If interest rate expectations are still too low and earnings forecasts too high, don’t be surprised if stocks get sliced further.”

Stagflation

• The World Bank is warning that the global economy may suffer 1970s style stagflation. According to them, it is possible world growth could be close to zero over the next 2 years.
• There is a view in many “advanced” countries that the will of principal taxpayers is to not follow their spendthrift governments by increasing their debt load in a slowing economy.
• According to some economists, the US suffered stagflation between 1973 and 1982. (I started Lipper Analytical in 1973) 
• Frankly, I don’t fully remember the period as I was quite busy building the firm and growing the family, so I asked an associate to research which mutual fund peer groups did best and worst. 

For the ten years ended in 1982 the top 5 peer groups in aggregate were:

       Precious Metals        +346.74%

       Convertibles           +220.51%

       Small-Caps             +214.81%

       Equity Income          +181.63%

       Growth & Income        +156.10%

Except for Growth & Income, these funds groups did not attract a lot of assets. The growth in assets was below $1 Billion in total, indicating the bulk of the industry produced good savings products, but not great investments as a group.

The five worst performing peer groups were also not popular with investors. Their 10-year performance is shown below:

        Short US Government   -10.22%

        Natural Resources     +23.37%

        GNMA               +56.11%

        Financial Services    +57.15%

        Miscellaneous         +64.43%

• To find individual fund groups that were extreme performers we looked at the two best and worst for each year. Not surprisingly there were only a few repeaters.

The most consistent winner were Precious Metals funds, at the top five times but also at the bottom three times. This seems appropriate in a period of rising inflation. Not surprisingly, Global Natural Resources finished at the top for two years. (During periods of high global inflation escaping out of fait currency makes sense. However, one needs to recognize that a greater fool theory game is at work, requiring quick sales to avoid losses.) We don’t have enough history and court cases to determine whether crypto related assets are better.

Where Are We Today

We have had a remarkably productive ten years in the market, but recently there has been great damage done to the ten-year performance records. (Unfortunately, my data does not include Friday’s painful numbers.) To over-correct in looking at the ten-year mutual fund performance record, I have eliminated peer groups gaining less than 10% per annum. 

I found 17 peer group averages that produced compound growth rates from 10% to 16.96%.  They are listed alphabetically below:

Capital Appreciation   Global Real Estate

Consumer Goods         Health/Biotech 

Consumer Services      India Region

Energy MLP             Micro-Caps 

Equity Income          Mid-Caps 

European               S&P Index 

Financial Services     Science & Tech

Growth & Income        Small-Cap 

Global

I question whether many regional fund groups can continue better performance than selective global competitors for long periods. Past performance is a useful research screen but cannot be solely relied upon due to changing conditions.

One change due to both bank and market regulatory modifications is the level of trading desk liquidity. It is shrinking and depending on the size of the trading relationship, access is uncertain.

Another concern is the needs and desires of consumers conflicting with the political desire for jobs. Both European and US governments appear to prize job creation over consumer needs for the best products and prices. This trend aggravates supply shortages and causes unnecessary inflation

Unaddressed Trends Can be Problems

We have been told that demographics is destiny, yet we are not paying attention to the message it is sending. Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab tweeted the following:

In 1952 the average global family had five children, now they have less than three. Following is the number of children per family in various countries: Niger 6.7, Nigeria 5.2, Senegal 4.5, Ghana 3.8, Pakistan 3.4, World 2.4, Mexico 2.1. The replacement rate in the US is 1.8 or lower and it’s 1.1 in South Korea (Within many people’s lifetime, India will have more people than the shrinking population of China. 

These numbers have long-term military, economic, and investment implications. What can be done about these trends?  One of the lessons from the US Marine Corps is to get the best possible troops on your side. Economically, the founders of Unicorns are the most productive people we have. (Unicorns are start-ups that become worth $1 billion or more.) The founders top 6 academic majors of these unicorn are in order:

Computer Science

Engineering

Business

Economics

Biology

Mathematics

Students who successfully take and complete these courses are used to precision and discipline. They learn at home or at an early age. We need more of these students to offset the eventual power of those growing societies.

Please Share Your Thoughts

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings-how.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/05/bear-markets-recessions-not-inevitable.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/05/falling-confidence-beats-numbers-but-be.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

News Focus May Drive Investment Success - Weekly Blog # 555

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

News Focus May Drive Investment Success 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

                                   

We are bombarded with hundreds if not thousands of bits of “news” and observations each day. Separating those that are important enough to impact our investment actions is one of the keys to long-term investment success. One useful filter is to separate the incoming into time buckets. The first is a cause for immediate action, before too many others do. The second are those significantly impactful inputs that are likely to change extended periods of investment results. Of course, the biggest bucket is for discards due to lack of value and/or integrity.

The sorting mechanism that I use can be described mathematically. The first can be described as the prime derivative. It contains factors that are slow to change most of the time and are likely to shape the results at the end of the investment period.  Demographics is an example which encompasses all those alive today and their inter-relationships. Other examples include the number of consumer units vs. the number of producing units, the interactions between productivity and income, the interactions of health and wealth, the size of the agricultural community to the quantity and quality of food produced, etc. These factors tend to move slowly.

The second bucket deals with the rate of change in the factors impacting the items in the first bucket. These factors are more driven by psychographics or how people feel at a moment. They are volatile and can change rapidly, as well as reverse direction. The content of the second bucket can be described as the second derivative of the first. Apparently, we have entered a period where the track of the second derivative is getting much more attention than the first. Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab (*) is quoted in Barrons as saying “better or worse matters more than good or bad”. Someone else has said “after driving 70 miles per hour, no one likes driving at 55 mph”.

Second Derivative Hot Spots
For portfolio managers who are generating much worse returns in 2018 than 2017 and are thus dealing with career risks, the following are some of the hot spots currently causing concerns:

• Cash is likely to perform better than stocks or bonds in 2018.
• This week there was a record net inflow into money market funds.
• Small business optimism has become weaker.
• Growth is declining in both China and Europe.

A contrarian might focus on the following items:

• The very volatile and often wrong American Association of Individual Investors sample survey which showed 21% to be bullish and 49% bearish.
• The size of the short positions in the SPDR S&P 500 and iShares China Large-Cap both represented 17% of their assets. These shorts will be covered eventually and often at losses, as these ETFs move up in price.
• Stock valuations using forward P/E estimates are the lowest in five years.
• More hedge funds closed in the third quarter than started, implying less competition.
• The most recent survey of US bridges showed that 9.1 % were deficient 2 years ago.

LONG-TERM INVESTORS USE A TELESCOPE NOT A MICROSCOPE
Looking through the current malaise and all but certain recession, followed by a certain recovery, I focus on fulfilling the reasonable needs of future beneficiaries. The list of items from the first bucket or first derivative are as follows:

• While most of the developed world’s population is stagnant, with an aging population that will need to find some retirement support, the developing world is producing both workers and consumers.
• In the developing world the levels of schooling and healthcare is improving.
• Technological developments will produce more value and at lower prices.
• There will be a shift of savings from the developing world to the developed world to help meet retirement purchases.
• Because interest rates have been constrained, valuations are acceptable for long-term investing.  

Question of the week: 
Which of the three lists most represent your thinking and why?


(*) A long position is held in a financial services fund that I manage or in a personal account or both.


Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2018/12/investment-memory-friend-or-foe-answer.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2018/12/worries-2nd-derivative-3rd-degree-and.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2018/11/on-road-to-capitulation-and-recoveries.html


Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Investors Need to be Wrong to be Right – Weekly Blog # 515

Introduction

Investing is an art not a science. In science the search is for a repeatable answer under every identified condition. As strong as it may seem to many, the search is not in the end the largest performance number. The search is the delivery of the required funds to meet the accepted needs of the beneficiaries; be they institutions or individuals investing within the realms of prudence. Thus, the investment manager’s primary function is to aid in the feeling of the well-being of the beneficiary. According to a recent report on happiness as applied to nations, well-being is based on income, healthy life expectancy, social support, freedom, trust, and generosity. It is far easier to contribute to well-being through sound investing. I believe our clients hire us to provide sound investments for them in order to accomplish their well-being. Thus far I have been able to deliver. But much of this is not based on the certainty of math and science that I learned in school and university, but as a handicapper at the New York racetracks. From an investment standpoint what I learned at the track that is useful can be summarized as follows:

1.  The objective is not to win every race but to finish the day as a winner (including expenses).

2.  Don’t bet on every race, there could even be days when no bets are made as the payoff odds are not appropriate to the probabilities foreseen.

3.  Occasionally the most popular bet is logical in terms of expected results, but the payoffs are too low because it doesn’t take into consideration what can be called “racing luck.” At these times it could make sense to invest in the second or third most logical horse if they are being offered at reasonable odds for second or third place and turn into larger money makers if racing luck overcomes the favorite. This is a good bet as favorites rarely win, even half the time.

4.  After concluding the most logical result, the real analysis begins, which is how much should be bet on this horse in this race? Weighting one’s bets can make the difference of a nice win vs loss record and walking away as a winner for the day.

5.  Accepting that I was wrong an uncomfortable number of times, but learning from the experience by re-examining both my analysis and how I handled my money and to a lesser degree my expenses.

Thus, I believe that, like other investors, I will be wrong in terms of market direction, sectors, “factors” and selections. To defend our beneficiaries’ interests I have adopted a policy of having a number of different bets at the same time, but with the recognition that unlike at the track where races end, the investment process continues through many cyclical periods.

“Goldilocks” May Be Leaving

Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab among others is raising concerns about the future. After all, for at least nine years it has been somewhat easy to ride the secular rise in the US stock market. (Shorter periods for other stock markets.) This issue brings up a number of questions: evidence of impending change and what should be the correct investment policy going forward. In terms of evidence of impending change there are two important elements:  flows into stocks are from traders not investors and credits may be mispriced leading to fixed income not providing stable values. This week some in the press for the first time are heralding significant flows into the equity market from “funds”, which shows the Public is buying the current conditions. The truth, according to Thomson Reuters’ Lipper Inc., is that $20.4 Billion came in net, but $18.7 Billion went into domestic oriented ETFs with $8.2 Billion going into the SPDR S&P 500 and $3.1 Billion into PowerShares (Invesco*) QQQ. Both of these are favorites of hedge funds and other traders. In numerous cases ETFs and ETNs are being used by these players as substitutes for futures which are more expensive. I am noting that a number of investors have sold short some ETFs that represent over 10% of their assets and in at least one case over 100%. What may be more disturbing is that a number of independent investment advisors and a number of advisors working through brokerage firms are managing discretionary accounts exclusively in ETFs/ETNs. Some of these are probably good, but I suspect many do not have any successful background in market trends, sectors, “factors” and the selection of individual securities. They may be, along with others, contributing to a much higher turnover rate in ETF/ETN portfolios than conventional mutual funds.

*Invesco is held in a private Financial services fund and personal accounts that I manage.

Credit Concerns

Remember that most significant stock market declines begin after a period of fixed income market declines. Through March 15th most bond funds are showing a slightly negative total return, which includes both their income and their market movement. The only domestic groups that are not negative are loan participation funds, some specialized credit vehicles, and ultra short maturity funds. I don’t know when the next recession will commence, but I expect it will be within this first term of the President. I do know that during a recession bankruptcies and other financial difficulties occur and they are not being priced into the market. Institutional term loans are being priced at only 3.2% above prime corporates, compared with 3.1 % before the crisis that began in 2007-8. Further, while banks have much more capital than they did before the last crisis, their book of derivatives is somewhat higher.

In a talk at a Futures conference last week, my old friend Tom Russo, formerly General Counsel to Lehman Brothers, mentioned that when a counter-party believes it was duped, the entire class may be considered illegal as an auditor will have difficulty claiming the asset is worth 100 cents on the dollar. He said, according to the Financial Times, that “when you owe a little bit you call your bank - when you owe a lot you call your lawyer. “A good bit of derivatives are directly or indirectly financed through the credit market.

What Should Investors Be Doing Now?

There is no special reason for long-term investment policy to be changed as long as it contemplates that there will be periodic market declines. This is similar to money that is invested in what we label Legacy and Endowment Timespan L Portfolios®. For those with a shorter focus of at least five years, they should be making two lists of equities and equity managers.

The first list should be of items that at higher prices would become risky if the general stock market rises at a rapid rate. (There is some chance of this happening as new money rushes in on the basis of buy-the-dip or FOMO fear of missing out.) The risk is that such a surge most often leads to a major fall, which could lead to structural changes. The second list should be labeled “Hopefully not to be used, but probably will be.” It is a list of sound companies and managers who may be slightly damaged in a decline but will survive and prosper. Both of these lists should have names and prices scaled to avoid emotional price reactions. Five or ten price points could be prudent.
__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Friday and Super Bowl Investment Lessons - Weekly Blog #509

Introduction

Sound investment thinking should not be isolated into an island of investment and economic numbers. The powerful future trends are not found initially there. The future is determined by people and how they think and occasionally react to what they feel about what they think they see. On this Sunday we are between Friday’s worst stock market decline since 2016 and the most significant Professional Football championship. Both or neither could be guides to the 2018 investment future.

Friday’s Stock Markets Actions

Depending on your personal favorite stock price measure, there was a low to middle digit percent decline was the beating headline. Far too many saw the fall as an automatic signal of potentially a much bigger slump. As usual, too many did not look further into it to see the significance. To me, they missed three important inputs staring with the smallest and moving through to more major structural issues.

Warehouses Provide Pricey Liquidity

Early in my investment career at a famous trust bank, I came across some large cap stocks that were unlikely to be price performers that were in numerous otherwise reasonably sound portfolios. The conservative investment still carrying the burden of the learned Depression experience were afraid in the 1960s that the then economic expansion would end with a substantial stock market decline. They had learned the risks of premature market timing and opted to put a portion of their client’s trust money in stocks that would rise in some symphony with an expanding economy, but would fall less than the market when the turn came.  The classic warehouse stock was AT&T which had not changed its common stock dividend since 1922. In effect it became a bond substitute and rose when yields declined and grudgingly held most of their value when interest rates rose in a contraction. (The current AT&T is not the same company and today may or may not be attractive due to its relatively high yield and the prospective benefit of the forthcoming 5th generation of the internet.) The owners of warehouse stocks were not criticized when they cashed in these stocks and used the cash to cushion the portfolio decline and eventually use the cash to buy more aggressive stocks at cheaper prices.

What appears to have happened Friday was several handfuls of large cap stocks fell more than the general market excluding these stocks. Many of these stocks were dominant holdings in Large Cap Growth mutual funds and similar ETFs. Numerous Mid and Small Caps fell much less. Is that due to the fact that they did not have a “warehouse function” on the way up or that their owners recognized that the trading capital in the market was unlikely to support significant sudden liquidation of the smaller brethren?

What I takeaway from Friday’s market action is a concern that there is not sufficient liquidity in today’s market to absorb easily a broad scale sell off.

Liz Ann Sonders/Minsky Moments Explanations

Liz Ann Sonders, Charles Schwab leading market analyst points out that there is a history of years with low stock price volatility and are followed by higher ones. As one of the better analysts on market sentiment and its limits, she points out that in the last three weeks in January the S&P500 went up over 7.5% and if annualized would have added 155% for the year.

Her caution parallels an earlier worry of the great Austrian economist who noted that periods of economic stability end with periods of instability.

Bottom line: too much complacency can be dangerous to your wealth.

Supply/Demand Better Analysis

All to often we make financial decisions based on numerical comparisons. Yet what we call judgment in many cases are human memories that our brains carry. For example, we tend to measure corporate success in terms of dollar revenues. Many automobile manufacturers are showing record dollar revenues, but in terms of units sold or even more important, number of customers/ families served, the results are more discouraging. The shift from two door sedans to five door SUV models hides these trends. The current enthusiasm for stocks is based importantly on better profit margins as taxes and burdens of excessive regulation are enlarging profitability. Most of the countries in the developed world have reached peak population except for immigration. In the US we have one birth every eight seconds, one death every ten seconds. Including migration, we are adding one person every eighteen seconds. Global population  is adding 4.3 births per second with deaths 1.8 per second which translates to 2.5 persons per second. This suggests that the US population’s future economic growth is more likely to come from serving and being served by people in the Southern Hemisphere with particular focus on Africa and Southeast Asia.

While I can direct our clients investment policies to these geographical   centers, until our society does we need to understand our loss of economic and financial ranking. What may make this task even more difficult for their own needs, government and central banks are attempting to manage inflation. They have not been particularly successful. Apparently inflation is actually a derivative driven by currency and trade. These in turn are propelled by a combination of consumers and commercial interests.

Hopefully Friday’s action suggests to all of us that we are living in a changing world where the future is not going to be copied from our old experiences.

Boston-Philadelphia Super Bowl Investment Lessons

Perhaps it is particularly instructive to search for investment lessons from a championship that puts football teams from these two cities against each other. While these two are no longer the largest or politically the most powerful cities in this country, they have contributed greatly to the formation of the US global financial community. Boston due in part to being the home port for the ships that spent years trading with Asia developed a culture of trusted capital management. Even today much of federal and other states’ law that directs much of the fiduciary principles that supervise the asset management industry. At one point there was more money managed by Boston law firms than the mutual fund business.

Philadelphia was not only the home of the Congress at the beginnings of the United States it also developed the key to capital equipment financing. Philadelphia lawyers created railroad equipment (boxcars) leasing certificates which created a global market for transportable assets and in turn supported the global market for mortgages.

For twenty years until I resigned, I advised on the management of the defined contribution plans for the National Football League and the NFL Players Association. From this experience, I believed that on any given day any team within the NFL could beat any other team. Thus as of this  Sunday afternoon I do not know which of these good teams will win. What I do know that the winner on a net basis will have the best combination of offense, defense, capitalizing on surprises, and leadership throughout their organization. These are the very same characteristics that I look for in selecting fund management organizations for our clients. Other inputs for us today are an assessment as to consumer acceptance and politics as seen through the eyes of the media which will color some of our investment thinking as well.

In Conclusion

I hope that we can draw appropriate conclusions from both Friday’s price actions as well as the Super Bowl; thus to be able to manage wisely the year ahead which is likely to be more difficult than 2017.

__________

Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.