Long-Term Money Via Telescope, Not Microscope - Weekly Blog # 951

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Long-Term Money Via Telescope,

Not Microscope

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

 

Historical Perspective

One lesson from studying history, including geology, is guessing the very next move in a series, which is more likely to be random than consecutive. The news business is an exception, selling a detailed description of what just happened. For example, the weekend chronicles might point out that more stock prices went down than up for the latest week and did so with higher volume. They’ll mention that only 58% of the NYSE stocks declined for the week, including 38% on Friday, compared to the NASDAQ where 64% fell for the week and 55% fell on Friday. Not one of these pundits mention that in the earlier part of this year and most of last year a greater portion of the stocks traded on the NASDAQ rose. More importantly, these stocks were bought much more recently than those on the NYSE. This suggests that both the purchase and sale of the NASDAQ stocks were speculative, not long-term oriented investments.

 

Switching to the telescope for longer time periods. Long-term investors should focus on the changing structure of the US population, where more than 1.8 million people left the workforce (169 million in June 2026 vs 171 million in September 2025). Some of these people trade stocks and participate in the weekly sample survey of the American Association of the Individual Investors (AAII). This week they turned bearish on their outlook for the next six months, with only 29.6% now being bullish, down from 44.9% the prior week. Bearish beliefs have risen to 42.3% from 32.9% the prior week.

 

Investors have generally missed gains in some global and international funds, as well as commodity and alternative funds. To understand the current performance of diversified funds you need to recognize the increased concentration in a limited number of sectors. The history of making money in the stock market often goes along with being lonely during changing long-term future trends.

 

One advantage of devoting time to investing is occasionally seeing some occurrences replay. On Thursday there was the rescheduled White House Correspondents Dinner with the President speaking, which reminded me of my time as chair of the program committee of the New York Society of Security Analysts. I suggested to the President of the Society that we invite President Gerald Ford, the only non-elected president of the US to speak to the analysts. I was given permission to invite him, with the deep belief that it wouldn’t happen. I called the White House and spoke to the lead speech writer who thought it was a great idea, agreeing to speak to the higher authorities. Surprisingly, they were looking at opportunities for the President to speak to the financial community about his “Whip Inflation Now” or “WIN”. I was invited to visit the White House to meet with the speech writer and go over the President’s thoughts on the subject. It became clear that they didn’t really care about my political views, but what jokes would be appropriate. I rejected most of the jokes. Shortly thereafter President Ford came to our meeting quarters on Williams Street. He came with Alan Greenspan and Frank Zarb, who had just joined the Cabinet after a career of turning around several brokerage firms. A topic I would have liked to hear more about. When the President came to the NYSSA, he was the first President since George Washington to speak on “Wall Street” while still in office. He included all the proposed bad jokes.

 

When President Trump spoke to the correspondents this week, he also told jokes that did not go over well. It seems as if Presidents speak about what they want and not about what their audiences want to hear. Like many investors, they don’t learn from history.

 

Those of us who pay attention to future liabilities for clients and ourselves should focus on the long term. What do you think?    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Before Focusing on Shorter-Term Reactions - Weekly Blog # 950

Mike Lipper's Blog: Little Occurred During the Trading Week - Weekly Blog # 949

Mike Lipper's Blog: Searching for Future Long-Term Picks: Gathering Assets, Reasons to Search - Weekly Blog # 948

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Why Didn’t We Buy? Did the Game Change?

As by now, you and practically every other stock market oriented person on the face of the earth knows, that after a significant market decline earlier in the day last Thursday, starting a little after 2:30 in the afternoon and lasting for about for 43 minutes, stock prices collapsed with 997 points on the Dow Jones Industrial Average disappearing.

A Strategic Question

What caused this calamity? At this point, no one has produced conclusive evidence as to the specific cause or causes. My concern is much more strategic than what was the immediate cause of the decline, (which to me is similar to focusing on the assassination of the Archduke that started World War I, rather than the irreconcilable differences between Germany and its neighbors). My concern is why I and others did not buy at the depressed stock levels. While I won’t be able to be definitive for some time or perhaps ever, I do have some thoughts to share with this blog community.

Lead-up to May 6, 2010

Recently the bulk of the trading in many institutionally-favored securities has been driven by proprietary trading desks and other professional traders including some hedge funds, not by investors. In response to calls from investors and some dealers, regulators have been determined to reduce the monopolistic power of the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ. They permitted, (some may say encouraged) alternative trading sites and procedures to come into being. The institutions now have many places to trade.

This market dispersal in turn creates the problem that traders must find the natural other side of the order they wish to execute. One of the techniques they choose to use is to divide their orders. Prior orders of 10,000 or more shares were given to a single broker or dealer to execute. In traders’ search to find volume on the other side, block trades have been replaced with many multiple 100 share orders, placed rapidly through a number of different market sites. Because of the difficulty involved in executing these trades, some institutions reduced their participation in the visible marketplaces. In the partial vacuum which was created, traders saw an opportunity to get between natural buyers and sellers and earn a spread. To find these partial vacuums they employed statistical techniques using various types of algorithms developed by PhDs from universities like Caltech and others. They were, in effect, mining the flow of information captured in prices. To avoid the “Black Swam” effect of something occurring beyond the expected, with a stroke of a computer key they could cancel all their below-the-market buy orders, which was what I believed happened Thursday afternoon.

An Inflection Point?

More disconcerting was the absence of large value stock buyers on Thursday. In last week’s blog I shared my brief notes from the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting. I saw a number of well known value fund managers at the meeting and I am sure that there were others there also. In theory, these managers always weigh price and valuation points as well as trends. With stock prices plummeting to levels that had not been seen for many years, why did they not rush in and commit all of their reserves? Tumultuous days in the market are often deemed to be inflection points. Was there some new vital information that caused a change in the valuation system used by these managers?

Market Intelligence

On Wall Street you don’t have to actually have superior information, you just need to act as if you have it. For many years when he was chair of the Federal Reserve Board, the market thought Alan Greenspan had better information than others because of his background as an econometrician. We now know, sadly, that his information, especially on housing, was not particularly accurate. Nevertheless, at that time, market practitioners tried to tease out the implications of his supposedly superior information.

Foreign Exchange Trading on May 6

Early on Thursday there was much concern as to most of the Mediterranean economies and the fate of the euro. There was a euro-yen trade early in the day which some took as significant. Up to that particular time most did not look to the yen as a safe-base investment currency. Did this trade suggest that the Chinese government’s attempt to safely cool-down their economy was working? Or did this mean that the rise of the US dollar against the euro was, in effect, causing the Chinese yuan to appreciate and thus reduce some politically sensitive trade imbalances? Was something else of significance occurring, causing sound, value-oriented investors to withhold their support from previously favored stocks?

A Non-Political Observation

From my standpoint a further complicating event happened this weekend. I am not making a political statement, but an informational belief. The good citizens of Utah chose not to re-nominate Senator Robert Bennett. Losing his knowledge as to how the markets work will be unfortunate for the country and particularly for investors. Next year’s Senate will have a lot to do with major regulatory changes that are likely to come.

Did the Game Change?

How should an investor, particularly a long term investor who uses mutual funds and hedge funds, react to Thursday and its aftermath? I suggest that some wise managers will be searching for the implications of this possible inflection point. If a number of successful managers start to do things differently, then I think that Thursday was important and our strategies should be adjusted. At this point I am weary of managers that think what happened was just an aberration. Be particularly careful until after the election.

What do you think?
_________________________________________

To Members of Mike Lipper's Blog Community:

For readers who would like to stay current on my uncommon perspectives regarding investing and world markets, join the community by subscribing, at no monetary cost, just your time and interest as well as occasional responses. Simply click the "To Receive Blog via Email" box on the left-side of the screen.

For those already receiving my blog by email, if you would like to recommend this blog to a relative, friend or colleague, the sign-up is located on the left-hand portion of the screen at www.MikeLipper.blogspot.com.