What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What We Should Have Been Watching?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Lessons from the racetrack and life

At any given time, humans tend to congregate around what is most important to them or what is going to happen. These topics are labeled favorites, both at the track and by psychologists. On any given day at the track favorites win a minority of the races. More importantly, when favorites win the payoffs are relatively small, as the winnings must be shared with a large number who have reached the same conclusion.  Thus, backing the favorite is a low return game.

 

The problem in going with the less popular is their winning ratio is lower, as most people bet on the favorites. Thus, in terms of frequency, favorite betting wins.

 

There is a more rewarding goal, winning more money over time with less frequency but higher returns. This is the choice I learned at the track and apply to investing in securities.

 

This Week as an Example

Using the public media and limited public conversation, their favorite investment topic was the speech by Fed Chair Jerome Powell at Woods Hole, the implication of which was a cut in short-term interest rates. While most investors believe these are probably the most important questions to be asked, I believe there are more important questions with higher, longer-term implications. These can be grouped under labels of concentration and valuation.

 

Concentration

Much has been written about the amount of money invested in seven or ten largely technology/financial stocks. One study shows that the ten most popular stocks in the S&P 500 represent 38% of the total value of the entire index. On average, the ten largest market caps in the index between 1880 and 2010 represented only 24%. However, I question the math or source because railroads represented 63% of the stock market in 1881.

 

This observation is of particular interest to me as a graduate of Columbia College. Around 1880 Columbia had an endowment account restricted to investment in the most secure stocks. You guessed it, lawyers restricted the investments to railroads!! This particular endowment was to be spent on bricks for the campus. Thus, for many years all of Columbia’s buildings were brick faced.

 

There were many important implications that should have been drawn from this case, especially since every single railroad went into bankruptcy years later. However, if you had included political analysis along with legal analysis it was obvious railroads had become too powerful in the country.

 

In terms of political analysis and understanding how the US works politically, people should read a new 856-page book written by Bruce Ellig, a good friend of ours. The title of the book is “What You Should Know about the 47 US Presidents”. The book devotes a chapter to each President, covering the most important laws and regulations of his term. Included in the book is information about the President’s life and personal activities.

 

Valuations

John Auters of Bloomberg believes “valuations are extreme”. Prices in terms of sales, earnings, book value, and dividends are at a stretching point. In a recent survey of intuitional managers, 91% believe the US market is overvalued and 49% believe emerging markets are undervalued. Some 60 years ago I worked for a research-director who believed shipments of boxes were a good economic indicator. They probably still are, and that is why I took notice that they were down -5% in the second quarter.

 

With the federal government pushing to let retail investors participate in private capital transactions, particularly private equity, the health of the market for these longer-term, illiquid investments, could impact the listed market. There are approximately 3100 positions in private capital firms that are unsold. Their retail owners may not see the level of distributions they were expecting, which could unfortunately increase the volume of listed securities to be sold.

 

Long-Term Horizons:

 In the long run equity investing can generate very attractive returns. A dollar invested in the 1870 equity market by the 25th of July would be worth $32,240 in nominal dollars before taxes this year.

 

 As often said, history does not repeat but often rhymes. There are a number of parallels with the market crash of August 1929 to November 1936, and the economic depression that followed from February 1937 to February 1945, which will be discussed in upcoming blogs.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rising Risk Focus - Weekly Blog # 900

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Two Questions: Length of Recession, Near-Term Strategy Choices - Weekly Blog # 600

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Two Questions: Length of Recession, Near-Term Strategy Choices

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Authors Note # 1 
This is our six hundredth blog. I hope you have gotten some worthwhile ideas to help with your investment responsibilities. My goal is to provide at least two ideas a year that make you think about your process, either differently or more thoroughly. As we are approaching our 12th year, I want to thank our subscribers who have shared their thoughts with me. These thoughts have helped me to reach our goals. I also want to thank my two editors who have been long term associates, the late Frank Harrison and his successor Hylton Phillips-Page. They have turned into English my too long Germanic sentences.

Length of Next Recession 
Any study of nature and economic history will show repeated periods of expansion (fat years) and contraction (lean years). In studying history, I believe they are not only inevitable, but required. It is important to separate economic contractions, which we call recessions, and market crashes. They are often in close proximity to one another, but not always. Economic recessions have a much greater impact on investment portfolios than so-called stock market crashes. For example, while much media focus continues to be on the October 1929 market crash, there is little mentioned that by December of that year the Dow Jones Industrial Average had risen back to its October levels. Thus, the crash was a technical dislocation and was not in itself a cause of the recession, or the psychological term that’s been applied, The Great Depression.

The historic reasons for contractions after periods of expansion, either in nature or economics, is an unsustainable expansion. There are many causes for unsustainable expansions:

• Changes in climate
• The outgrowth of war on both the victor and victim
• Confusing secular growth with cyclical growth to meet a temporary demand vacuum
• Too low or too high prices
• Leaders of governments and/or businesses attempting to extend a tiring expansion
• Loose credit that keeps both companies and individuals seemingly solvent, but creates zombies awaiting bankruptcy
• Excess capacity creating excess supply, driving prices lower among competitors 

If recessions are inevitable, what is the question for investors? 
The question is the time span of the recession. Most modern recessions, as reflected by the stock market, have a duration of about 2 years (1-3 years). Considering the folly of those who have been correct in spotting a price peak and then have being wrong about the bottom and subsequent tops, I will not attempt to call an end to the current dance.

Considering my focus on long term investment accounts, it raises some questions. Does one stay with sound portfolio holdings enjoying the expansion, on the belief that their past gains will carry them through a roughly two-year decline. While not publicly admitting that this is their strategy, most individuals and institutional investors are currently following this strategy. There are however other issues that should be examined:

• The current US stock market expansion is over ten years old.
• Governments around the world are actively pushing nominal and inflation adjusted "real" rates down, creating zombies out of both corporations and individuals who should be exiting their debt. 
• Not fully understanding that technology drives prices down, changing purchasing habits and creating deflationary trends which are often elements of a financial collapse. For example, there were those who believed we had seen peak auto production in the 1990s in Japan and in 2016 in the USA. These beliefs resulted from changing demographics, living habits, ride sharing, and the growth of US public transportation. Without a strong auto industry politics would change, as well as many other things. 

If our next recession lasts five or possibly ten years, shouldn't we be change our portfolios?
The problem with equity type risk in stocks, high yield bonds, and private equity/credit, is what to change it to? While mutual fund investors are not always right, it is interesting to note that the largest net flows are currently going into money market funds, followed by high quality commercial bonds.

As usual, Jason Zweig of The Wall Street Journal had some things to ponder. He reported that in 1929, on the basis of the radio boom, the Radio Corporation of America had a price/earnings ratio of 73 times and a price to book-value ratio of 16 times. Amazon, because of the promise of "the Cloud", recently had the same numbers if not higher.

Author's Note #II 
In the early 1960s I was a young analyst awaiting the boom in color television. After many years it finally happened, with RCA rising above its 1929 peak. The color television boom grew slowly because of the difficulty in producing acceptable quality television picture tubes. There were only a handful of suppliers and RCA was late in converting one of its factories in Pennsylvania to a color picture tube plant. Thus, I and many analysts visited the plant, followed by lunch with their management at the local country club.

The meeting date was November 23rd, 1963. It began and effectively ended with the announcement that President JFK had been shot and later died. Clearly, there were lots of unanswered questions at that time. One that struck me came from a well-know, but nameless analyst “what was happening to stocks on the American Stock Exchange?” This was significant because the largest manufacturer of color tubes was listed on the ASE. My guess is that he personally held that speculative stock with a large borrowed balance. The markets quickly closed to prevent a panic which would have wiped out many, including those on borrowed margin.

It was a very silent time on the train ride home from Pennsylvania that night, but it gave many of us a real understanding of the risks we were taking and how volatile markets can react to the unexpected. This kind of experience shapes one’s thinking for a lifetime. The US markets reopened the following Monday morning to reassure buyers.

Near-Term Strategy Choices 
In my role of selecting mutual funds for clients, I am always looking to balance the risks and rewards of investing. My associate Hylton and I do this is by reading financial documents and visiting many successful managers. This weekend I reviewed the strategies of a number of successful managers. I am happy to have a discussion with subscribers to see if any of these strategies fit within their responsibilities. The following list is not in preference order, but in the order of when I read their latest report:

1. Import substitution (A bet on lessening globalization)
2. Mid-Cap Opportunities (Not particularly unexploited)
3. Better stock prices in China (Taking advantage of retail selling)
4. Overweight financials (Contrarian bet on rising interest rates, which seems inevitable)
5. Market share can be better than reported earnings if it is profitable and leads to higher EPS
6. Cautious on momentum (already happening)
7. Illiquidity is expected to get worse
8. Investment decisions are based on current prices, not macro views. 
9. Absence of bargains (Warren Buffett's complaint) 

Questions for the week: 
What portion of your portfolio could successfully survive a long recession?



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/10/things-are-seldom-what-they-seem-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/10/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/10/contrarian-bets-and-other-risks-weekly.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.