Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not - Weekly Blog # 907

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Anticipation Pays; Deliveries May Not

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

Since last December the bulls have been calling for a drop in the Fed interest rate. Some anticipated an interim pay-off near the close on Thursday when the last print on the 10-year yield failed to maintain its announcement high, fulfilling the dictum of selling on the news. The number of Friday’s declines on both the NYSE and NASDAQ were above the number of rising prices.

 

With the much-expected rate cut I found it interesting that the sample surveys of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) were bearish for the last three weeks. The six-month projections stayed in the 40% range for all three weeks (42.4%, 49.5%, and 43.4% respectively). In the latest week, which probably did not benefit from Thursday’s rate cut, the bullish estimate of 41.7% was slightly below the bearish call.

 

The explanation for the three main market indices rising to record levels from their April lows this week was the familiar “FOMO”, fear of missing out. I suspect traders sharing that impulse were largely housed in retail-oriented wealth management arms of brokerage firms and non-trust departments of banks.

 

The battle for investment survival is being waged by armies marching under the “FOMO” banner, as well as others withholding their purchase orders upon reading the economic data. There are two ammunition arsenals safeguarding the non-buyers, the declining number of job-openings and the rise of non-US traded equities benefiting from the fall of the US dollar. In April there were 158,000 jobs added, which fell to 22,000 in August. Barron’s shows the investment performance of 14 local markets in Europe and Asia each week. This week Europe had 4 risers and Asia 8. Asian and Emerging Market funds were most prominent among the better performing mutual funds this week.

 

On a longer-term basis there are a number of worries about investing in US markets:

1. The US market is becoming more speculative, with year-over-year NYSE share volume rising 16.24% and NASDAQ 68.97%.
2.  The current administration appears to want to reduce the independence of the Federal Reserve.
3. The President and SEC are floating the idea of switching from quarterly reporting to semiannual. Both ideas will make foreign-traded issues more attractive than they are now.
4. The drive to include non-publicly traded securities in retail accounts, particularly retirement portfolios, is expected to increase the risk of losses.
5. The London edition of the Financial Times devoted a full page to the headline “A new era of McCarthyism?”, showing a picture of President Trump and the late Senator McCarthy. This reminds me of sibling rivalry between an older brother and a successful younger brother. With a number of listed London exchange stocks moving to the US there is risk to a portion of the London market.

  

With the US stock market indices but not the average shares at record levels and the economy open to question, please be careful.

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bad Comparisons Can Lead To Faulty Conclusions - Weekly Blog # 905

Mike Lipper's Blog: Appeals Court Rules (7vs4) Against Trump, but Life Goes On - Weekly Blog # 904

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Selected and Casual Road Notes - Weekly Blog # 906

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Selected and Casual Road Notes

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

In London on a visit with Mount Vernon Ladies Association.

1. PNC buying a Colorado Bank signifies that it needs more assets than it can reasonably produce operationally.
2. Long-term, the fixed income swing in wealth management accounts is bullish for equities.
3. The value of information is more than its accuracy.
4. Nitrate risk in Iowa and other states is a big problem for the farm community.
5. In the UK, a cartoon referred to Andrew Jackson as King Andrew. He was the first of our four activists Presidents. The other three were Teddy Rosevelt, FDR, and now Trump. Each tried to materially change the financial structure of our society and fought with the courts, which may have hurt more than it helped.
6. The British Empire was based more on global trade than military strength. With that as a thought, allow me to present a very controversial goal which will be very difficult to create. The US and China should form a common market as the two largest markets. Both countries have disciplined labor, science, and leadership based on corporate skills.
7. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations was read by William Pitt, the younger. His leadership may have been a major contributor to British economic growth after 1776.
8. Through Thursday, the year-to-date average performance of US Diversified Equity Funds was +12.70%. Only Large-Cap Diversified Growth funds did better. However, a large number of equity fund averages were better, mostly technology and overseas investments. Five fund peer groups produced rises of more than 30%: Global Precious Metals +98.46%, Latin America +36.75%, China +32.84%, International Value +31.69%, and International Multi Cap Value +30.94%.
9. The AAII survey sample of six-month projections showed 28% being bullish and 49.5% bearish. These are close to extreme results.

 

Conclusion

Too much attention is paid to the short term, with media commentary often having a negative slant. There clearly are risks, with our current activist president paralleling the 1929-1932 period, where FDR accidently turned a recession into depression. Even so, the long-term for our descendants could be quite attractive, eventually.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bad Comparisons Can Lead To Faulty Conclusions - Weekly Blog # 905

Mike Lipper's Blog: Appeals Court Rules (7vs4) Against Trump, but Life Goes On - Weekly Blog # 904

Mike Lipper's Blog: What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission. 

Bad Comparisons Can Lead To Faulty Conclusions - Weekly Blog # 905

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Bad Comparisons Can Lead

To Faulty Conclusions

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Your Portfolio vs. Stock Indices

The biggest trap the media and sales community set for both institutions and individual investors is comparing portfolio performance with a stock index constructed by a publisher. The best US stock market index is probably the S&P 500 Composite (SWX is its symbol).

 

The index is published by Standard & Poor’s Global (*), whose components are selected by data analyst editors, not investment managers. In a performance year where a company splits into two or more publicly traded stocks; the index carries each component of the former stock for the performance year. That is why the SWX measures slightly more than 500 stocks at times. Additionally, almost every active investor’s portfolio contains some cash or similar instrument. In periods of large gains or losses, the performance of non-equities will affect the performance of an account, but not the index. Furthermore, it is extremely rare for an active portfolio to own anywhere close to 500 names.

(*) Owned in client and personal accounts

 

In measuring the performance of the SWX, the measurement compares the closing trade price of the prior trade date to the ending price of the current day. It is extremely common for the ending price to be higher or lower than what an investor receives, so the actual performance of an active account is likely to be different than an end price calculation.

 

The management committee of the Wall Street Journal and the Standard & Poor’s editors have decided that SWX will only contain stocks that are listed on US stock exchanges. They also do not limit the percentage size of holdings in the composite, while the SEC limits diversified mutual funds to holding no more than 5% weighting within the portfolio of any given stock at cost (not market). Non-diversified funds are not restricted this way.

 

In today’s world, managed accounts are almost certain to hold cash or fixed income instruments as redemption reserves. Additionally, opportunity reserves will in many cases include non-US listed securities.

 

Many years ago, for these reasons, we convinced a number of outside directors of mutual funds to compare the performance of their funds to similar portfolios of funds. I believe this is the way almost all investment accounts should be measured, whether they are funds or not.

 

Other Mis-labeling

Last week, three of the five leading large-cap stocks were labeled financials; JP Morgan Chase (*), Morgan Stanley(*), and American Express(*). None of the articles I read mentioned that Charles Schwab(*) was the fourth largest declining large stock on Friday. Clearly, Schwab has something else going on that the first three do not, despite sharing the same industry label.

(*) Client or personally owned

 

Also last week, there was no mention of various countries whose local market indices showed gains, Europe 6 and Asia 12.

 

Another example of incomplete labeling was a headline of Goldman predicting that “Gold will hit close to $5000, if Trump undermines the Fed”. Perhaps true, but other commodities and some foreign stocks may do just as well. (Coincidently, a strategic collaboration between Goldman and T. Rowe Price to create a range of public and private investments was also announced. As a part of this collaboration, Goldman will invest $1 billion in open market purchases of T. Rowe Price stock.  Perhaps the more important message, is that Goldman believes the market is not offing enough diversity.)

 

Question: What are your thoughts? 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Appeals Court Rules (7vs4) Against Trump, but Life Goes On - Weekly Blog # 904

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Appeals Court Rules (7vs4)

Against Trump, but Life Goes On

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

All of us were unprepared

The “Founding Fathers” designed our government to protect the minority against the majority, with the courts ruling on critical decisions. Now that the future of tariffs rests with the courts, I suspect The President will push for a quick decision.

 

I would hope at the end of judgement day we will have answers to two of the motivating drivers behind The President using tariffs to force discussions with both Congress and foreign countries.

• The first is “Non-Tariff Trade Barriers”, which may be larger than the size of the reciprocal tariffs, which are policies the importing nation forces on the exporting nation. The prohibition of certain fertilizers on imported food elements, or various power constraints on mechanical equipment or transportation vehicles are examples. There are a multitude of restrictions like these imposed by national or local governments on people’s taste buds. In total, these restrictions may very well be enormous in aggregate.
• The second issue is the use of the money generated by the tariffs. (It is well worth remembering that for more than a hundred years, tariffs were the main source of funding for the US government.) Economically, tariffs are a tax on the society. However, it is not clear whether the funds raised will fall under the control of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or some other instrument of government. The funds raised may potentially be used to reduce the existing deficit, pay for the newly issued tax breaks, or paid out directly to consumers.

The answers to these questions are needed to solve the riddle of weather these tariffs add to or reduce inflation. The independence of the Federal Reserve Bank is therefore a critical factor in dealing with the tariff issues. Many feel the Fed controls short-term interest rates and influences intermediate-term rates. However, it is not that simple. In an article by George Calhoun in Forbes, he lists recent experiences where the Fed lowered rates while the markets raised them. One of the reasons rates rose is the dollar declined or was expected to fall. George Calhoun is a professor and fellow board member at the Stevens Institute of Technology.

 

The commodity markets are keenly conscious of inflation expectations. This week commodity futures rose, led by natural gas +2.64%, gold +1.21%, and copper +1.01%. Another way to play the same trend is in the stocks of the commodity producers, which are owned by specialty funds. Specialty precious metals funds rose +2.70%, China funds +1.31%, Agricultural funds +1.30%, and Base Metals funds +1.12%. While the Courts will decide on the appropriate questions, the markets will collectively reward those who guess right regarding the direction of prices.

 

Please provide any thoughts that might give me a clue on how to avoid losing money and perhaps make some.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What We Should Have Been Watching?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Lessons from the racetrack and life

At any given time, humans tend to congregate around what is most important to them or what is going to happen. These topics are labeled favorites, both at the track and by psychologists. On any given day at the track favorites win a minority of the races. More importantly, when favorites win the payoffs are relatively small, as the winnings must be shared with a large number who have reached the same conclusion.  Thus, backing the favorite is a low return game.

 

The problem in going with the less popular is their winning ratio is lower, as most people bet on the favorites. Thus, in terms of frequency, favorite betting wins.

 

There is a more rewarding goal, winning more money over time with less frequency but higher returns. This is the choice I learned at the track and apply to investing in securities.

 

This Week as an Example

Using the public media and limited public conversation, their favorite investment topic was the speech by Fed Chair Jerome Powell at Woods Hole, the implication of which was a cut in short-term interest rates. While most investors believe these are probably the most important questions to be asked, I believe there are more important questions with higher, longer-term implications. These can be grouped under labels of concentration and valuation.

 

Concentration

Much has been written about the amount of money invested in seven or ten largely technology/financial stocks. One study shows that the ten most popular stocks in the S&P 500 represent 38% of the total value of the entire index. On average, the ten largest market caps in the index between 1880 and 2010 represented only 24%. However, I question the math or source because railroads represented 63% of the stock market in 1881.

 

This observation is of particular interest to me as a graduate of Columbia College. Around 1880 Columbia had an endowment account restricted to investment in the most secure stocks. You guessed it, lawyers restricted the investments to railroads!! This particular endowment was to be spent on bricks for the campus. Thus, for many years all of Columbia’s buildings were brick faced.

 

There were many important implications that should have been drawn from this case, especially since every single railroad went into bankruptcy years later. However, if you had included political analysis along with legal analysis it was obvious railroads had become too powerful in the country.

 

In terms of political analysis and understanding how the US works politically, people should read a new 856-page book written by Bruce Ellig, a good friend of ours. The title of the book is “What You Should Know about the 47 US Presidents”. The book devotes a chapter to each President, covering the most important laws and regulations of his term. Included in the book is information about the President’s life and personal activities.

 

Valuations

John Auters of Bloomberg believes “valuations are extreme”. Prices in terms of sales, earnings, book value, and dividends are at a stretching point. In a recent survey of intuitional managers, 91% believe the US market is overvalued and 49% believe emerging markets are undervalued. Some 60 years ago I worked for a research-director who believed shipments of boxes were a good economic indicator. They probably still are, and that is why I took notice that they were down -5% in the second quarter.

 

With the federal government pushing to let retail investors participate in private capital transactions, particularly private equity, the health of the market for these longer-term, illiquid investments, could impact the listed market. There are approximately 3100 positions in private capital firms that are unsold. Their retail owners may not see the level of distributions they were expecting, which could unfortunately increase the volume of listed securities to be sold.

 

Long-Term Horizons:

 In the long run equity investing can generate very attractive returns. A dollar invested in the 1870 equity market by the 25th of July would be worth $32,240 in nominal dollars before taxes this year.

 

 As often said, history does not repeat but often rhymes. There are a number of parallels with the market crash of August 1929 to November 1936, and the economic depression that followed from February 1937 to February 1945, which will be discussed in upcoming blogs.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rising Risk Focus - Weekly Blog # 900

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

"The Week That Wasn't"

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

History or Not

TWTWTW (Was the abbreviation for "That Was The Week That Was". The British had a somewhat comical review of critical news, with jibes at our doings or non-doings. In a number of ways this past week was one of increased anticipation of the steps toward smoothing out some of our problems. The most critical was a cease fire in Ukraine, which would be a step toward ending the killing in that war torn country, and would also influence global economic trends. These results were expected to lead to more sales in the US and abroad, allowing the Fed to lower interest rates.

 

At the so-called summit in Alaska the two antagonists spent three hours restating existing positions but found only some unannounced agreement on how to reach a ceasefire.

 

At the same time a collection of US central bankers met to discuss economic policy, which to most of the public was encapsulated to mean changing the short-term Federal Funds rate. The official topics to be discussed were demographics, productivity, and immigration’s impact on changing the US job market.

 

Some available data points indicate that early in the next century the US population will peak. Long-term labor productivity is largely driven by education, beginning at the earliest school and home days through the graduate levels. Education is lacking appropriate leadership and funding. In the past, immigration brought us hard-working, intelligent people, a trend that could now be reversing.

 

What is the Data saying?

The following are some data points I am reading, in no particular order:

1. This being an investment blog it is important to note that the bottom of the US stock market occurred in 1929, before depression analysis officially began. This suggests the stock market may be an early warning signal.
2. The "Taylor Rule" predicts the Fed funds rate. It states the current Fed funds rate of 4.5% should be 5%.
3. Deere reduced its revenue estimate. Farm income was in a recession before the depression, and it was one reason for passage of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. (I believe one reason the current Fed has been reluctant to lower interest rates are the many smaller midwestern and western bank loans and the feelings of their senators. Jamie Dimon is also concerned that it is difficult to quickly take over community banks under present rules.)
4. Jerome Powell is looking at the impact of tariffs on business services excluding shelter, which appears to be rising faster than other measures of inflation. In the month of July business services rose 1.4%.
5. Over the last 3 weeks the AAII sample survey’s bearish projections have risen to 46.2% from 33.0%.
6. Each Saturday The WSJ measures the prices of 72 items. In studying the data, I have noted that the single largest gainer or decliner often results from an unusual market factor. Consequently, I look at the second biggest gainer or loser and look at the spread between the two. In the latest week S&P 500 Health Care rose +4.62% while Comex Gold sank -3.00%, a spread of 7.62% which looks normal.
7. In the week ended Thursday, the best performing mutual fund peer groups were those unpopular for most of this year. (This suggests for the moment that there is safety in unpopularity. If you are looking for the best odds, bet on a material change. All three of the small company categories: growth, core, and value show promise.

 

Working Conclusion

Beneath the surface there is a lot happening, both in the long-term (the next century) and from a trading viewpoint. One should pay attention to quiet markets.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rising Risk Focus - Weekly Blog # 900

Mike Lipper's Blog: Melt Up Not Convincing - Weekly Blog # 899

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS:

DATA VS. TEXT

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

School Solutions

As taught academically, the critical pivots in teaching both economics and security analysis are the numerical changes of a data series. However, as a long-term investor I am much more interested in the mood changes hinted at in textual renditions. While data precisely represents the past, text allows the reader/student to think about one or more different futures. This is why I believe philosophy or similar courses should include both economics and security analysis in their teachings.

 

Below is a brief listing of several data points describing last week (Implications italicized and discussed in parenthesis).

• Year-to-date Stock Transaction Volume: NYSE 7.11% vs NASDAQ 37.30%

(Five times greater in the younger, more speculative market, even if some of the NASDAQ is inventory swapping among dealers. Speculation normally leads to extreme up and down prices)

• Inflation Signals: The ECRI Index tracks industrial prices weekly and it normally moves gradually. Last week it rose +1.70%.

(I believe this was in response to the tariff news at the end of the week. Some market participants believe there will be industrial price increases soon).

• Participants in the AAII sample survey are increasingly worried about a down market in stocks, but others are not.

(Comparing the bullish and bearish projections of last week with those 3 weeks earlier. Bearish projections rose to 43.7% from 34.8% 3 weeks earlier. Bullish bets only rose to 34.9% from 33.6% for the same period, suggesting bears see reasons to be worried while bulls do not. Only one will be right over the next six months.)

• Equity mutual fund peer group averages +10%. Only one US Diversified Fund (USDE) peer group average has generated returns exceeding 10% year-to-date, multi-cap growth funds. Forty other peer groups have generated returns exceeding +10%, although they were less diversified.

(USDE Funds hold more assets than the other peer groups, which suggests being a holder of US equities was not a winning hand for most.)

• Investors need to be careful that the earnings reported are not accounting constructions. The London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) and I.B.E.S. estimate that the S&P 500 Index will report a +8.3% gain for the 3rd quarter. However, they further estimate that corporate net income will rise only +6.3% for the quarter. Thus, 24% of reported earnings will be attributable to buybacks and other accounting techniques.

(Investors need to understand what they are paying 20x-earnings or more for. Hopefully, operating earnings can be repeated while earnings created through accounting cannot.)

 

Conclusions:

There are lots of reasons to be cautious. Some reserves should be considered a hedge for future down markets. However, this hedge should be viewed as a temporary buying reserve until prices more appropriately reflect the long-term value of accepting normal risk.

To aid future generations of investors as well those today, security analysis and economics need to be taught with a fuller understanding that it rests on the strength of ever-changing language.   

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rising Risk Focus - Weekly Blog # 900

Mike Lipper's Blog: Melt Up Not Convincing - Weekly Blog # 899

Mike Lipper's Blog: It May Be Early - Weekly Blog # 898

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.