Showing posts with label cyclical decline. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cyclical decline. Show all posts

Sunday, November 26, 2023

A Cyclical World + Consistent Results - Weekly Blog # 812

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

A Cyclical World + Consistent Results

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 


What We Don’t Know

We don’t know the dates and length of the next “bear market", or if it will “correct” the imbalances causing material problems for society. Similar questions have been asked throughout recorded history in the Bible, and even before that.

 

We have numerous records of rising and falling fortunes for both countries and individuals. In terms of specific people, we know of births, deaths and various sicknesses, as well as successes and failures. In a two-dimensional chart we can see the highs and lows. Unfortunately, we don’t know all the underlying causes for these end points. These events often occur at unpredictable times and suggest to me that while we can guess as to the next occurrence, there is no guarantee our timing will be precisely correct.

 

This creates a problem in managing client money. Prices move up and down, reaching end points at different speeds and magnitude. To judge the skill of investment managers, it is most useful to measure them against as appropriate index, particularly of reasonably selected competitors. This approach is in conflict with many owners of investment capital who have obligations to periodically pay some income/capital to beneficiaries. Consequently, owners without substantial payment reserves prefer to measure their results in repeatable calendar periods.

 

Going Out on a Limb

Based on a casual study of financial history preceding Biblical times, I am confident we will continue to have investment cycles. Thus, I believe we will have down markets in the future ahead of us.

 

Our job as analysts and portfolio managers is to estimate how deep the next major decline will be, and when it will likely occur. I am reasonably sure we will have a downturn in the US stock market before the end of 2028. What I do not know is whether this will be a cyclical bear market for most stocks, or a more serious correction of major imbalances addressing quality of leadership in education, the health sector, the military, and government.

 

(There is some evidence that the coming decline will be cyclical rather than corrective. History suggests most investors should maintain current holdings in sound companies, riding through the cyclical decline to benefit from the bull market that follows. On the other hand, if the decline is going to address various imbalances, many managements and companies will be replaced.)

 

Current News Bits Could Show the Way

  1. Julius Baer has taken a $93 million bad loan provision, which includes holdings in Selfridges and the Chrysler Building. (The loan was made to a well-respected global player.)
  2. Private equity firms are buying back failed IPOs.
  3. According to Marcus Ashworth of Bloomberg, the supply of Sovereign Bonds will rise sharply through at least 2026. (This will likely keep interest rates from falling).
  4. Goldman Sachs is predicting the S&P 500 will gain 5% without dividends and 6% with dividends in 2024. More importantly, the S&P 500 would end the year at 4700. The record high was 4724 on 1/3/22, so no bull market anticipated. Additionally, there will be no P/E increase until 2025, which would have the S&P 500 P/E at 20x at the end 2025.
  5. The use of currencies has been innate in some people since civilizations began. Sam Bankman-Fried in a NYC jail used the currency of inmates to purchase a haircut for 4 packs of mackerel.
  6. A visit to the high-end “The Mall at Short Hills” saw an orderly but unenthusiastic crowd practicing controlled shopping, fitting the merchant’s expectation of a dull Christmas.

 

Summing Up

The fact that the 3 popular market indices are all within 1% of their annual highs on relatively low transaction volume does not generate excitement. The presently dull Christmas Season is more attuned with global commercial real estate debt issues and increasing layoffs in the financial community.

 

Cash yields of 5% or higher are currently a hurdle to investing for the longer-term. We appear to be in some form of suspended animation.

 

Please share how you see things, particularly if you disagree.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Recognizing a Professional: Ratings vs Ranking - Weekly Blog # 811

Mike Lipper's Blog: How to Find the Answer - Weekly Blog # 810

Mike Lipper's Blog: Preparing - Weekly Blog # 809

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, April 17, 2022

Short & Long- Term Thoughts - Weekly Blog # 729

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Short & Long- Term Thoughts

I. Confusion or Choices

II. Critical Investment Business Trait


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




I.  Easter Week Signals

The US trading week consisted of only four trading days this week. Nevertheless, it created two different implications. A columnist at The Financial Times thought it signified a confused market. I on the other hand thought it implied multiple choices of future market movements. Let me explain. Over the four days 8.2 million NYSE shares traded to the downside, which was more than the 7.8 million shares traded to the upside, suggesting a falling market. On the other hand, the NASDAQ upside share volume was 9.8 million, which was above its downside volume of 9.2 million, favoring the bulls. The often contrarian AAII summary survey reached an extreme bullish reading of 15.8%.

What to me is more significant was that within various investment sectors some leading firms purposely lowered profit margins. They did this by increasing spending on new sectors by adding to their dominant positions. In the financial sector, Goldman Sachs, T. Rowe Price, and JP Morgan Chase spent today’s dollars for new sources of capital, new markets, and new ways to reach new clients. If all they foresaw was a cyclical decline, they like their competitors would have let their profit-margins rise. However, all three made the choice to invest for a broader and probably better future, instead of just enjoying a cyclical expansion. There were similar moves in other sectors. Long-term investors should think about these expenditures when considering a future bull market. 

(I have cautioned blog readers that I would be looking across market valleys to the beginnings of subsequent rising markets.)


II. Critical Investment Business Trait

We are always searching for new investment advisors of funds, or separate accounts, while simultaneously reviewing existing holdings. If you think it is difficult to select funds and managers for future performance, I can assure it is more difficult than choosing individual securities. 

I attempt to learn the business traits of portfolio managers and their business leaders. As it is unlikely I will be present when an actual or potential investment opportunity surfaces, I rely on my memory as to how the manager reacted to similar opportunities in the past.  The key to that muscle memory is budgeting.

One of the many missing topics for CFAs and others is budgeting. If they are the keepers of clients’ wealth, it is helpful to see how they spend their time. 

  • Managers in every period spend at least 50% of their time on existing holdings, including following competitive positions.
  • Managers new to their responsibilities should spend another 25% searching for new or better names. Even established portfolios should attempt to increase new names by about 10% each year and  market cycle. 
  • The remaining time and talent should fill two buckets. 
    • The first should focus on the care of clients, helping them to become more aware of the realities of the investment process as applied to their own situation. 
    • The final bucket should be part of the firm’s early warning system, being aware of new competitors, people, or ideas. 

The ultimate responsibility of the manager is to secure the clients longevity beyond the manager’s employment. You guessed it, budgeting is the heart and soul of managing, something not taught to CFAs and others.  



Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/04/is-this-great-investment-era-ending.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/04/wwiii-slightly-delayed-bear-market.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/03/not-much-weekly-blog-726.html




Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.



Sunday, February 13, 2022

Building Long-Term Investment Portfolios - Weekly Blog # 720

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Building Long-Term Investment Portfolios


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




After the Valley

We don’t know what future investment markets hold for us. Nevertheless, we have an obligation to those who rely on us to guide their assets, both currently and when we are no longer around. The nice part of the latter responsibility is, we won’t suffer the consequences.

Based on both recorded and geological histories, we expect the future will contain both up and down periods. We often don’t know which type of period we are in or going into. Unlike most others, I am professionally imbued with a need to plan, no matter how wrong the projections may be.

I start with the premise that we are on a winding slope of a market decline. The following are brief abstracts from four highly respected investment leaders, which in total point to a downward slope:

Goldman Sachs - Expect lower returns for market indices

T. Rowe Price - Global growth is primarily dependent on China

GMO Capital - Stocks are expensive and resources are cheap

Merrill Lynch - Late stages of a maturing bull market

Thus, I have started to prepare a portfolio of both stocks and funds that would benefit from a subsequent rise in the global stock market.


Cyclical or Structural Decline?

A cyclical decline essentially corrects for overly enthusiastic valuation measures in earnings multiples and/or the attractiveness of current yields. Most market declines are of a cyclical variety and are quickly corrected. 

The problem with assigning a cyclical label to the expected decline is history vs outlook. Due to excessive government stimulus spending, many corporations have reported unsustainably high earnings growth, with earnings growth much larger than revenue growth. First half 2022 earnings growth rates are going to look puny compared to the first half of 2021. Many companies will show modest growth compared to 2019. 

One should recognize that for ten years or more price/earnings ratios have expanded and have been a meaningful contributor to prices increasing dramatically more than economic growth. Thus, there is a reasonable probability that the coming recession will be a cyclical one. However, there is a historic example of the federal government taking a cyclical recession and turning it into a structural depression, by implementing radical policies to reorient society. The President that did that based on his “brain trust” was FDR, who is a model for the current resident in The White House.

Is there a societal need to reorder our economy and society? I suggest there is a need to reverse the damage done by the school system, which has produced students who cannot find jobs due to both their behavior and lack of educational discipline. Increasingly, the growth in STEM jobs is overseas, a precursor of future relative economic growth. A structural decline is somewhat unlikely, but one should consider it in developing investment portfolios.


Four Portfolio Approaches

Large-Caps

Most individual and institutional investors prefer to invest alongside others. That is why 30.3% of mutual fund investors are invested in Large-Cap funds, with an additional 19.8% invested in S&P 500 Index funds. While the stocks in these portfolios get most media and pundit coverage, there is “decay risk” lurking. Over the last 100 years, not one company on the largest companies list has survived in the Dow Industrials Index. As the old saying goes, success breeds failure. Companies reach their peak relatively quickly and become more interested in maintaining position rather than growing, particularly in new products and services. 


Small-Caps

In many, if not most time periods, small-cap aggregate earnings grow faster than the largest-caps. However, there are four drawbacks to investing in small-caps.

  1. They have a higher rate of business failure, with the larger ones being rescued.
  2. Some of the better small-caps are bought by larger companies, cutting off their price growth.
  3. Lack of media and analyst coverage leads to greater volatility.
  4. They have an absence of critical talent at stress times.


“Barbell”

A favorite technique of the investment community is to take two extreme positions and “barbell” a portfolio, e.g., large-caps/index funds with small-caps. The absence of selected mid-caps and internationals, or enough heavily weighted winners, can produce poor relative returns.


Idiosyncratic Selection

Idiosyncratic selection from the entire global marketplace. Many investors who practice this artform kid themselves, as there is great similarity in their selections. The following is a list of characteristics that can be limiting to successful investments at times:

  • Best Product/Service
  • Top Market Share or Fastest Growing
  • Great CEO (Replaceability risk)
  • Lack of Debt or Too much Cash
  • Institutionally Owned (Liquidity risk)
  • High earnings growth (Unsustainable)
  • Smart Ownership
  • Large customer base (High renewal potential unless market changes)
  • Well-connected within industry and government (Things change)
  • Estate and other ownership issues
  • Speaks ESG language (Plus or minus?)
  • Never moved headquarters
  • Strong social connections 
  • Ownership too concentrated by age and type of investor
  • Etc, etc, etc.


Career Investing

Current and future persons making investment decisions should view themselves as career investors. Part of career investing is accepting periodic mistakes and learning from them, but also carefully exploring fields for potential investment, particularly beyond current borders.



What are your thoughts 

  


Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/02/changing-focus-in-changing-world-weekly.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/things-are-seldom-what-they-seem-weekly.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/two-critical-questions-weekly-blog-717.html



Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.


Sunday, February 2, 2020

Significant Turnaround? Two Fearful Histories - Weekly Blog # 614




Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Significant Turnaround? Two Fearful Histories

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



Current Pictures 
All three popular US stock market indices have price charts indicating a top of some magnitude. Market analysts view these tops as a sign of a reversal of a major trend. The questions facing investors today:
  1. Is this a correction of perhaps 10% and an opportunity to buy a favored cheap stock?
  2. Is it a cyclical top with a potential decline in order of magnitude of about 25%?
  3. Is it a less frequent structural change that might cause a displacement of 50% or more?
2020 is still very young, but current markets as reflected through mutual fund performance are showing dramatic trend divergences. Year-to-date through last Thursday, the only mutual fund investment averages above 4% were: Global Science & Tech +4.86%, Large Cap Growth +4.09%, and the more domestically oriented Science & Tech +4.07%. Declining Equity Mutual funds were Natural Resources -8.38% and Basic Materials -5.15%. Commodities declined even more: Energy -11.35%, Basic Metals -7.18%, and Agriculture -5.02%.

After generating net sales earlier in the year, High Yield mutual funds and ETFs suffered significant redemptions this week, while higher credit bond funds continued to draw positive net flows. The Wall Street Journal' s weekly chart of 72 securities indices, currencies, ETFs, and commodities, only saw 24% of them registering gains. The spread between the price of gold and gold mining stocks also narrowed. These data points are  not encouraging for those looking for higher stock prices.

The task for professional analysts and portfolio managers is to examine the current data and look at possible alternative future directions. Most bright futures take care of themselves and the job is simply trying to optimize the rate of return. The less frequent downsides need to be reviewed more carefully, because for professionals there is much greater career risk.  The owners of capital need to blame someone other than themselves for major declines, but often take all the credit on the upside! I therefore periodically examine the chances of cyclical and structural declines, without excessively focusing on when they will occur.

What's Wrong? 
A top followed by a significant decline is usually identified with an event that focuses people's attention, although it often has little to do with the underlying cause. How the underlying cause for most wars is explained is a classic example. For example, school children are taught that WWI began because of the shooting death of Austria's Archduke by a lone anarchist. The truth is, the balance of power keeping competing nations in check after the Napoleonic era was breaking down. The growing strength of Germany, combined with weaknesses in France and Russia, led to them creating self-defense alliances with weaker states. Note, hostilities did not begin until six months after the tragic murder. It was the movement of Serbian troops threatening Austria that brought Germany and Russia into military conflict.

Somewhat like the US entry into WWII being caused by a single attack on Pearl Harbor, resulting in a Declaration of War by the US against both Japan and Germany, plus Italy. The Coronavirus is similarly be blamed for the decline in most stock markets around the world. The virus has led to one hundred or more deaths of the thousands infected. Unfortunately, there will be more, but it will eventually be contained and cease to be a problem. What it has done is to dramatize the importance of China to World Trade. Although China has contributed about half of global GDP growth, it still represents a relatively small number. The markets were showing weakness for some time before the advent of the virus and many industrial stocks and commodities were flat or declining in the latter part of 2019, if not before.

The 1929 peak in October marks the begin date of the Great Depression, but few realize that by December 1929 the Dow Jones Industrial Average had fully recovered. (Perhaps, there is still hope for stock traders this year.) There are always a number of factors that contribute to making a top and its subsequent decline. The current ballooning expansion of credit is one of the conditions shared by events leading up to the 1929 crash. "Bubble or Nothing" is the title of a study by The Jerome Levy Forecasting Center LLC, which makes the following observations:
  1. The last three US recessions were ended by ever larger inputs by the federal government.
  2. Economic recoveries were successively smaller after each recession.
  3. Private credit has expanded at a faster rate of operating assets and operating income.
  4. Most national governments are already operating with a deficit.
I would add that astute bond investors are already conscious of these conditions and are shifting their purchases to the highest quality non­-government issues, reducing their immediate commitment to high yield. Also, I find it very interesting that the performance spread between the price of gold and the price of gold mining shares has narrowed. In the modern world, other than when currencies become worthless, the main reason to buy gold is in anticipation of inflation. However, there is none in the government published data.

What to Do?
  1. History has favored buying high quality and holding it for long periods of time, if it remains high quality. 
  2. For US individual investors, the step-up at death is one of the best ways to pass wealth on. (That may not always be the case!)·
  3. It does not mean we all abandon buy and hold strategies and become traders. However, it does force investors to focus on the timing of planned cash expenditures. 
  4. The size and composition of the payments reserve needs attention, recognizing that guessing the future is fraught with mistakes. Based on present conditions, I suggest that payment reserves for the next five years be invested only in high quality paper, with up to 50% in maturities under one year. 
What about Long-Term Money? 
The history of greed and fear cycles indicate we cannot avoid periodic tops and declines. I suggest that intermediate length accounts be prudent and hold reserves of at least 25%, with maturities of five to seven years as a limit.

For those investments meant to be long-term or legacies, recognizing that within a generation you are likely to experience a structural top. As long as there are sufficient payment reserves, I would not add any additional reserves, except for those who can use opportunity reserves effectively. Many fiduciaries can't or won't.



Congratulations to Clark Hunt for his team winning the Superbowl, demonstrating the value of teamwork.



Question of the Week: What is your sense of timing as to the market and how is it expressed in your portfolio?



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/01/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/01/is-it-always-brains-over-flexible.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/01/architectural-sway-points-and-current.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, August 13, 2017

Managing for the Next Decline - Weekly Blog # 484





Note:

In order to ease indexing, I have added the blog sequence number to my weekly posts.

Introduction

All life is cyclical going from good periods to poorer periods. No one has repeatedly been able to predict the tops and bottoms on a regular basis. Unlike actuaries, those who learn the basis of analysis at the racetrack assume that they will be wrong some of the time. There are two keys to investor survival, the first is to be selective in which races to bet on. The second is to change the levels of the bet based on both the intensity of the conviction and to a lesser degree the need to preserve some wealth. At least this is how I look at the markets and manage the money for which I am responsible.

Any survey of known history identifies periods of rising and falling prices as human emotions react to changes in perceived conditions. From a portfolio management perspective, to me the odds favor a meaningful decline between now and probably the time of the next US Presidential election. The decline will be measured in terms of prices of securities and/or general economic data; e.g., Gross Domestic Product (GDP). There have been times when individual markets or economies have fallen and occasionally both at roughly the same time.

The problem is that few investors have had a good record of timing these declines. My life-long study of mutual fund performance suggests that winners in a particular phase who raise a lot of cash on the downslope are not very successful at recommitting the cash on the way up and often over long periods of time underperform those that accept the pains of declines, but in general remain largely fully invested in equities and especially in well managed equity funds. This is less true in bonds and commodities.

To attempt to answer the questions as to selectivity, weighting, timing, and turnover, I have developed the concept of Timespan investing. Thus, today I look at the future through the filters of at least four different Timespan Portfolios.

Short-Term Operational Portfolios

At the moment these are the most price sensitive portfolios because these have near-term payment responsibilities. For some non-profit institutions and active families the next several years can be particularly stressful. Not only that the odds favor some price disruptions in most securities and commodities markets, but there are the new imponderables of net federal and state tax payments. At the very same time as we may be experiencing a cyclical decline, calling for more contributions to those who are suffering, but a high likelihood that those of wealth will be paying more taxes as forgone taxable deductions will have greater impact than a decline in federal tax rates. In addition, in many states and local communities taxes will go up to fill some of the smaller grants from the federal government.

Often these short-term portfolios are made up of income-producing securities. As corporations see new opportunities to profitably invest in capital expenditures (even as they may reduce buy-backs) the rate of dividend increases may slow. Depending on the depth of the decline, markets may fear that there will be reductions in some dividends.

To balance the stock risks in these portfolios often a significant part of the money is invested in a variety of credit instruments. Historically the prices of these instruments did not move much. There is however a good chance that some of these will become much more volatile. Over the last couple of years many institutional investors with a primary background in stocks have offered to their clients new Credit funds. (In some cases to improve their yields these portfolios are leveraged with borrowed money.) One might be concerned with the impacts of a rumor on the credit worthiness of any of these instruments creating volatile prices which will surprise some holders.

To those that are funding some non-profits and/or family spending, they may be caught in a squeeze as inflation rises. I tend not to give too much credence to government produced inflation figures. For those who have borrowed on the doubling of LIBOR levels in the last year as it moves closer to the mythical 2%, it could be driving costs up for some people. Interestingly there is a real dichotomy on savings rates offered by institutions who are paying LIBOR or higher rates, while the average money market deposit rate has dropped to 0.29%.

Limits on Upside Removed

Now that the price gaps have been filled in by the recent declines, the limitation on further price appreciation has been probably eliminated. This elimination does not guaranty gains, it is just more likely to occur than recently.

Bottom line: shorter-term portfolios will require more than custodial attention.

Intermediate or Replenishment Portfolios

These are the portfolios that are meant to replenish the operating portfolio’s payments. The duration of these portfolios should be tied to the internal policies of the account. One guide may be the period that the chair of the company or investment committee is likely to be in place. From a stock market vantage point it would be wise to consider that the period should include an expected market cycle.

As I have worked with funds advising on incentive compensation, I have favored four to seven years to set the target period of a portfolio manager’s performance pay. I am particularly concerned about the use of three-year periods, because they can be one directional and not show important elements of a full cycle. Over the last fifty years in the US 37% of the time there has been a down quarter which means 63% of the time the stock market has risen and therefore there is no institution-wide experience in down markets. This may be of real significance today as there has been only 15% of the quarters in decline since the first quarter of 2007. We could well see a major rise in down quarters to bring the current 15% closer to the historical rate of 63%.

Portfolios often own both growth and cyclical stocks. Almost all companies are affected by the cyclicality of the economy and various segments. If one could count on the bouncing ball type of behavior of a cyclical market to come back to prior levels, a buy and hold strategy would work fine. This is particularly true if the dividend is maintained through the cycle. However, in some cases former performance is not repeated. For example investments in telephone companies largely dependent on physical long lines in the age of the internet are unlikely to reach their old levels of profitability. For years there has been the substitution of aluminum and plastics for steel in cars and trucks which suggests that despite what happens on the tariff front it is unlikely that many steel companies will return to their old levels of profitability and employment.

Bond Downgrades, Reality or Rumor

Without signs of great enthusiasm for stocks, any cyclicality is likely to be limited to a decline in the twenty percent range which is a difficult arena to successfully raise cash and redeploy fast enough to beat many buy and hold quality stocks. This is not true on the bond side as there has been too much money coming into the bond markets at current prices and yields. At some point rising interest rates will drive bond prices down. It is quite possible some of those who purchased their positions with leverage will be forced to sell out into an illiquid market. A credit rating drop from investment grade BAA down two levels to B increases the expected default rates for maturities of five years from 1.67% to 22.06%, In other words the rumor or the fact of downgrade could raise the possibility of losing over one-fifth of the par value of the bond.

Long-Term Aspects of the Endowment Portfolio

Our Endowment portfolio is meant to fund the expected needs of those currently alive and thus expected to live through numerous cycles. Quite properly long-term investors should be concerned about a major market decline. In the past approximately once a generation there have been a period, usually quite short, of a 50% decline. All investors at all times should be on the lookout for the bubbles that lead to theses declines. Bubbles are created by human nature when greed relegates fear to a forgotten corner of the mind. Those of us who dwell in the world of numbers will often be very premature, that is wrong, in spotting bubbles through the use of market or economic statistics. The more useful guide is to listen to the level of enthusiasm both the professionals and the public express. Some of the attributes of past bubbles are as follows:

- A new discovery that is expected to bring wealth to many.
- Apparent liquid markets, often one-sided in reality.
- Easy and cheap credit.

At the moment in terms of stocks I don’t yet see signs of a bubble which means that long-term endowment accounts should stay reasonably well invested in stocks now.

Legacy Portfolio Items

Periodically equity market prices are focused predominately on near term results which are often troubled. At the very same time these enterprises are developing not just the products and services that will be in great demand in the future, but more importantly a cadre of managers that can bring a lot of the potential to fruition. To an important degree it is like looking at young racehorses who are expected not only to have winning records but to be successful breeders. Not easy to find, but worthwhile. Currently perhaps the best returns in these searches may be found in frontier and emerging market investing. All of these opportunities will experience some turmoil during their development. One needs very skilled analysts and portfolio managers to find these opportunities and enough patience to hold them.

Questions:

What are you going to do in the next decline?
Have you been able to identify desirable Legacy investments?
__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2017

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, January 25, 2015

The Dangerous Law of Small Numbers



Introduction

As numbers absorbers we are all aware of the Law of Large Numbers. That is the law that indicates that it is difficult for a large number to grow at the high rate of smaller numbers. For instance the population of the World in the short run is unlikely to grow at the same rate of increase as a bunch of newlyweds. Much less recognized is a law, (perhaps one that I am inventing), the “Law of Small Numbers.” Both laws are designed to prevent fellow numbers absorbers from getting their expectations wrong. Enough about math and on to investing, both for others through institutions or individuals including us.

Plus or minus 20% for 2015

What is behind such a bold statement? The answer is “the Law of Small Numbers.”  Both the investment media and various year-end treatises are full of small numbers in terms of growth of earnings, sales, margin improvement, inflation and interest rates. Most of these currently have two things in common. They are expressed as mid to low single digits and they are being revised downward. I cannot dispute the math of the calculations, but I do their scenarios.

A single small number, particularly when it includes a decimal point, screams of its painstaking accuracy. Most economists and analysts probably forgot most of their history and only remember key dates, but not the underlying movements. One of those elements, the power of surprise to change the equation of various battles, one learns from military, including naval, history.  While Certified Public Accountants do not allow for contingencies in their audited statements, I have in various businesses, including non-profits, always insisted in the mathematical recognition of uncertainty about the future, and created at least in my mind or in operating statements, reasonable reserves for things that could go wrong. Occasionally, reserves may be needed to pay for an upside breakthrough or other development opportunity that requires immediate funding before revenues are generated. In the US Marine Corps it is standard to hold back part of one’s forces on line, keeping one combat unit in reserve to relieve and support the front line elements. Even after these reserves are committed, a secondary reserve is created out of the headquarters staff, including the band and other support elements. Thus in the Marines, I was always taught to have reserves ready to deal with contingencies or surprises. I believe this kind of thinking is necessary for long-term investment survival. Thus, I look askance at small number future estimates.

Why 2015?

While I acknowledge I do have a well-honed contrarian streak, the current year may well be one of surprises not built into the small number estimates. On the upside various US consumer sentiment surveys are showing that in 2013, 35% of consumers believed that they were better off  than before, and in 2014 the number jumped to 47%. Carrying this sentiment further, 65% responded that they expected their finances would improve. (Interesting that 2013 was a better than average year for equity investing; 2014 was good but less than 2013 and considerably less for most managed money portfolios. The year 2015 so far is nervously flat.) I believe that it is likely that the two US political parties will dwell on the upside, albeit with different views of the future, in the run up to the 2016 election.

I have mixed views as to this rising sentiment. For some time I believed that the US stock market has been building toward a dramatic peak. One of the missing elements that presage a peak that will bring on a major decline is a bout of great enthusiasm which could lead to a parabolic stock price explosion. While I might enjoy the experience, my responsibilities for my related accounts will require extreme timing prudence which is not easy during periods of great excitement.

The 20% downside is less frightening to me as we have experienced these in the past and survived and prospered. Nevertheless, we need to be aware of negative surprises caused by nature, political miscalculations, misplaced military adventures, and market structure issues; e.g., counterparty problems unfortunate court cases, etc. These are not built into the small number estimates which are floating around.

Perhaps naïvely, I currently perceive that there are more risks outside of the US than in it. The US is expanding despite the structural damage of bailouts and quantitative easing instead of fiscal policy. Too many European and some Asian countries will be burdened by top-down economics rather than bottom up efforts of a striving population. (Over the next fifty or more years, it is just possible that some Southern Hemisphere countries will be more productive in terms of investments than the average in the Northern Hemisphere.)

Bottom line

The year 2015 may be more exciting than 2014 and many former years. We should be able to tolerate a cyclical decline from today’s levels but the emotional absorption of a surprise major market gain could create a nasty hangover. For our accounts we will be guarding those with relatively short-term time horizons and likely to be more active in terms of trading. Our longer-term investment accounts focus on selective secular growth should be relatively quiet except to follow Sir John Templeton’s instructions to look for better bargains. (John was a very much valued client both of our data and consuming services and we enjoyed being a shareholder in his funds and company when it was relatively briefly traded publicly.)

Question of the week:
Please share with me your views as to what are the odds of a 20% gain and what are the odds of a 20% fall.
__________    
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Comment or email me a question to MikeLipper@Gmail.com .

Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com 

Copyright © 2008 - 2015
A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.