Showing posts with label Silk road. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Silk road. Show all posts

Sunday, January 14, 2024

“SMART MONEY” Acts Selectively - Weekly Blog # 819

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

“SMART MONEY” Acts Selectively

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

Dull Week with Some Clues

The stock market from mid-December through this Friday was flat, except for an early bubble in January. (I suspect the NASDAQ price surge resulted from the replacement of some holdings sold for tax purposes in the fourth quarter.) Market analysts suggest a flat price pattern might represent the smart money either accumulating or distributing meaningful positions. This suggests prices will either move up sharply or fall rapidly after a period of time. I will attempt to examine what I perceive as clues to future major moves.

 

NYSE and NASDAQ stocks declined for four of five days in the latest week. The DJIA rose for three days and the more professionally followed Dow Jones Transportation Index fell for three days. As a contrarian measure, analysts watch the latest weekly summary survey published by the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). In the latest survey, participants raised their 6-month bullish prediction to +48.6 % or double their bearish guess of +24.2%. (Lucky for those who work in the market and those who live off of it. Individual investors have a good long-term record. From a contrarian viewpoint following them has value, because they are wrong at critical turning points.)

 

The number of publicly traded companies has been dropping for many years, mostly due to acquisitions, not failures. In 2023 there were 15,766 IPOs vs 17592 the year before. More significantly, the money raised dropped to $170 billion from $242 billion.

 

There are several thoughtful columnists who occasionally focus on financial history. John Authers of Bloomberg wrote “America is disinflating…disappointingly slowly.” He believes a major future expansion would require more problems than are currently visible. James Mackintosh of the WSJ warns investors that the market goes up and usually produces satisfactory returns in most 20-year periods. There are a few times it does not. (It’s important to remind investors that there can be times when investors won’t be bailed out in a given 20-year period. I wonder if that is why 30-year bonds and mortgages were created.) I believe he would have more confidence in recoveries if interest rates were set by the market and not by government fiat.

 

One problem with many economists, both within and outside government, is that they do not have enough appreciation for lessons learned from Asia and the Middle East. For example, we don’t seem to appreciate the products and technology that came to the West along the Silk Road. The following is a list of products or services that traveled the series of trans-Asian roads:

 

Silk, Hemp, Cotton, Wool, Paper (Paper Money). Fireworks (Explosives). Gunpowder, Tea, Horses, and algebra from India.

 

Working Conclusions

Recognizing that I don’t know what the future will bring, I turn to my investment/betting framework for a relatively conservative perspective. For the time period ended early 2025, I suggest there is a 60% chance of a significant US equity decline. The decline will perhaps be in the neighborhood of 20%, with an outside 50% chance of a full depression with an 80% drop. There are also two other possibilities at 20% each. First, a 5-7-year period of stagflation, and second, a 20% chance of below 4% GDP growth.

 

For estate planning purposes with a 30-year outlook, expect equity returns to be in the 5-9% range.

 

Your Thoughts?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Solo Messaging is Meaningless - Weekly Blog # 818

Mike Lipper's Blog: Our Wishes & Perspectives - Weekly Blog # 817

Mike Lipper's Blog: Dangers “Smart Money” & Thin Markets - Weekly Blog # 816

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Sunday, April 9, 2023

3 PROBLEM TOPICS: Current Market, Portfolios, and Ukraine- Weekly Blog # 779

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


3 PROBLEM TOPICS:

Current Market, Portfolios, and Ukraine

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Current US Stock Market

The views and focus of pundits can be very misleading. Below is a list of some of them and my contrary thoughts for you to consider and react to. In no particular order:

  1. The narrow performance premium of stocks over bonds is “ugly”. (To the contrary, it may be a good entry point. Over any reasonable investment period one could envisage a 100% - 1000% gain for equities and/or equity funds. I doubt one could see that in bonds.)
  2. The recent announcement of the number of people hired was “bullish”. (Within the release there was the note stating that the number of hours worked declined. When business is bad it is normal for a company to announce cuts in costs before a large layoff. This announcement was for a given middle week in April. At about the same time the NFIB Small Business Hiring Plans Index announced a 15% decline for March (small businesses employ over half of working Americans). The NFIB also showed a widening gap in the number of hours worked between the rank-and-file employees and all others. This may show that businesses can’t find entry level workers wanting to work. Another factor could be the better weather in March and April relative to the first two months. This suggests the rise reported for April was more weather related than from improving business conditions.
  3. Almost 90% of the first quarter’s gain came from just 20 stocks. UBS noted that if mega cap growth stocks were deducted from the index, the remaining stocks would only have gained 1.4%. (New “bull markets” are not normally led by the leaders of the last up market. Currently, Large-Cap Growth funds are leading, and small-cap value funds lagging - Tech vs Financial Services.)
  4. While the interest spread between two and ten-year Treasuries has narrowed very rapidly to 530 basis points, from 1400 recently. It raises the question of whether the inversion is going to precede a significant recession. The weekly survey of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) is often considered a contrary measure by market analysts. In three weeks, the bearish prediction fell 13% points to 35%, with the bullish reading gaining 12% points to 33%. These numbers show how volatile the individual investor is, but it also shows that the bulls have not built a base for a higher market at this moment. (I disagree with the opinion of many professionals that the public is always wrong. I believe that they are mostly wrong at turning points, but generally right over the long-term.)
  5. In a period like we are in now, the twin absence of trading capital in the hands of the former floor Specialists and “upstairs” traders is having a significant impact on the security selection of investors. (Look at the declining average performance of mutual funds in the first quarter: Large-Cap Funds +6.71%, Multi-Cap Funds +5.11%, Mid- Cap Funds +1.78%, and Small-Cap Funds +0.50%. This rank order is the reverse leadership position of many past bull markets.
  6. The term “book value” should only be used by accountants, never in front of unsuspecting investors. Book value has nothing to do with either useful books or value. It is an accounting term to spread the remaining non written off purchase price recorded on the balance sheet. It has nothing to do with the liquidating value of an asset, or what a knowledgeable unrelated person would pay for the asset. The present or future value of an asset might be of interest to a potential buyer if it is sufficiently discounted for the trouble and bother of actually receiving the assets and liquidating it. 


Constructing Portfolios

With the exception of an entrepreneur singularly focused on a business that it close in value to the total of its assets, the assembly and management of investor money in portfolios is the real art of investing, not buying and selling individual securities.

Most individual investors and some institutions mechanically add and subtract securities from a portfolio. Most others have a single portfolio with some focus or general need. (I believe one should have multiple portfolios rather than just a collection of securities.) Each portfolio should have a narrow focus, often built around the timing and execution of the beneficiary’s needs. I use singular rather than plural terms, even if the timing and cost of the same security is different between accounts. (It could generate significant impact and therefore could be managed differently.)

The biggest mistake most people make is measuring success based solely on the calendar year, because it’s what everyone else does. (I believe accounts should be measured based on the first reasonable date assets will be paid out. There are also other issues to consider, such as the number and extent of down results compared to up results. As the market moves up and down in its own periods the measurement period should likewise be adjusted. To the extent possible, after-tax returns are preferable. If you buy the same security at different prices, each tranche should be measured separately, especially if the price is quite different. Buying a great security late in its rise rather than at the beginning impacts the results of beneficiaries. While the security may be the same, its intended purpose could be different.

I sit on a number of tax-exempt investment committees and try to get my fellow trustees to pick individual measurement periods. If a stream of payments is required for building a new facility, I suggest making the end date slightly before the first payment date, changing that date based on schedule. For annual operating funds, I use the same concept, but with much smaller time periods.

Finally, where possible I like to pick selected mutual funds having similar portfolio characteristics whose management sticks to policies that can responsibly be followed.

 

Ukraine is Just the Beginning, Not the End

We are all horrified by the cruel invasion of Ukraine. We wish the war would end, with the country’s full land being restored. Unfortunately, I believe we will be involved with Ukraine for many years, possibly generations. The unhappy reason for such a fearful statement comes to us from logistics management.

Just like Political “Science” courses, Securities Analysis is taught about the past and briefly hints at the present. One of the main tenants of sound business practice is building reasonable defenses against future problems. One of the largest potential problems facing businesses and countries can be summed up by the change of “Just in Time” production and delivery to “Just in Case”. Until very recently, businesses located the production of critical supplies where it was the cheapest to produce and where rapid transportation could ship goods and services to major customers.

The rise in tensions with China and some other locations has caused the US and others to review from where they will get their critical products and services. While China should not be ignored as either a source of goods or a market for sales. If either were drastically reduced or totally stopped, we would be in serious economic trouble. Currently, there is a mad dash to find supplemental sources of both production and sales. Other Asian countries are being examined, as are Mexico, other Latin American countries, and Africa, among others.

One very rich region I fully expect to play a role is Central Asia. This region contains Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan. In addition to supplying the critical rail thruway for China’s “Belt and Road”, the region provides the new Silk Road to connect China’s vast population and resources to Western Europe. The region consists of 61 million people and 1.5 million square miles. With both Russia and China as neighbors, this is an important piece of real estate. Permitting a US Air Base in the region would solve lots of problems in opening up Central Asia. It would provide access through the Caspian Sea and reinforce Ukraine’s interest in the Black Sea. While this will be an expensive addition to accommodate our needs, my guess is we will be there.                                   

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: What To Believe? - Weekly Blog # 778

Mike Lipper's Blog: Equity Markets Speak Differently - Weekly Blog # 777

Mike Lipper's Blog: We Allow Our Investment Professionals to be Lazy - Weekly Blog # 776

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

 

 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Saturday, August 6, 2022

Investors, Politicians, & Other Children - Weekly Blog # 745

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Investors, Politicians, & Other Children

 

 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

    

 

 

Most investors, politicians, and other children act as if they are the only people that have had to deal with behavioral challenges. However, there is very little in life that is totally new, only the packaging has changed.

 

For example, how should one measure progress, and should it cause action? Most of us have some level of confidence in reported numbers, although numbers are an abstraction of a reality, not reality itself.

 

We are all counters from an early age, and since tradeable money was created have tended to count many of our successes and occasional failures in monetary terms.

 

The problem is the value of money is in the eyes of the beholder. One hundred million Confederate dollars has very little, if any value today.

 

Those dollar bills were on the losing side of a painful war, but we have been on the losing side of an age-old battle since birth. That depreciating value is called inflation.

 

The crux of the problem is the creator of this vehicle of exchange is also one of its largest users. Furthermore, the ruler of the mint or printing press is in a position of strength due to support from the right people. The easiest way to keep their loyalty is to pay them. In imperial Rome it was called “bread and circuses”.

 

In many Roman cities and towns, the amphitheater was larger than the nearby fortress. These were the entertainment centers for the populace who had enough food to eat due to an efficient agricultural system with well-engineered aqueducts.

 

I find it revealing that today’s name for giving money indirectly to the population is derived from a Latin word for stimulus. In earlier days it was called a bribe.

 

When a long-distant trader, Marco Polo, worked along the long Silk Road (1271-1295), the most advanced society was the Chinese empire. It developed gun powder and later developed paper money. Not surprisingly the empire had a large government, with examinations for jobs.

 

From my standpoint, smuggling silkworms back to Europe created a market-based exchange with a sounder form of money, especially when compared to their traditionally weakened currency. This is the way he delt with inflation.

 

In the thirteenth century the Europeans were somewhat protected against inflation due to small indigenous silver mines whose content went into their currency. This lasted into the next century and was replaced by gold and silver produced at low wages in Latin America, starting about 200 years of inflation.

 

When the steady stream of gold dried up the overseas colonies of England and other European countries became too expensive to maintain without substantial taxes. This is the reason a political group in England was not disappointed with the result of The American Revolution.

 

Confidence in the Future is Low

There are a plethora of signs showing this lack of a defined future:

  • What are yields on US Treasuries saying? 2-year Treasuries are yielding 3.25%, 10-year Treasuries 2.84%, and 30-year Treasuries 3.07%. The 2-year is inverted relative to the 10 and 30-years!!

  •  All 3 of the AAII survey predictions for the next 6 months are in the 30-39 % range.


  • While 53% of the DJIA companies were winners for the week, the DJIA lost value in aggregate points. By comparison, only 40% of the companies in the Transportation index were winners.

 

  • The JOC-ECRI industrial price index dropped 5.15% year over year.

 

  • Exchange traded equity funds continued to suffer redemptions, led by growth and value funds.

 

  • Liz Ann Sonders, the highly respected chief strategist from Charles Schwab is not bullish because she has not seen the market capitulate, as would normally be the case near the end of a bear market.

 

My Views

I have been searching for reasons to be optimistic for our long-term investment accounts, as after every bear market there is a bull market.

 

I agree with Richard Bernstein that bull markets don’t start with narrow leadership.

 

I believe economic and market cycles are not just number exercises, which you might be led to believe after reading columns from the various pundits.

 

I believe cycles are critically needed to address severe imbalances, not just trading opportunities. In previous blogs I have listed troubling demographics quality of schooling, healthcare, military strength, and leadership.

 

As I do not see these imbalances being addressed, I am afraid we will experience one or more recessions. There is a popular hope we will avoid a recognized recession, or only suffer a mild one.

 

If that were to happen, it would not likely sufficiently address our problems. I have no doubt our politicians can continue to produce a smoke screen to hide the issues. The current proposed legislation is an example of this, almost guaranteeing a major recession in a couple of years.

 

If that were to happen, much like during Paul Volcker’s tenure where he had two recessions, there would be substantial risk of a needed recession with very high interest rates.

 

I look forward to a new bull market with some answers to our problems, even after that experience. Our families will need one.

 

Please comment.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/weather-market-economic-and-political.html

 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/beware-of-cheap-seek-fair-slowly-weekly.html

 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/07/time-to-be-contrary-weekly-blog-741.html

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

  

Sunday, July 28, 2019

Chinese Emperors Learn “All Roads Lead to Rome” - Weekly Blog # 587


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Chinese Emperors Learn “All Roads Lead to Rome”

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



Before focusing on the underlying geopolitical/economic elements in our current tensions, we should focus on the immediate signals highlighted below:
  1. As of this week seven of the twenty-one US Diversified Equity funds averages and five narrower sector fund averages have gained more than +20%, including the average S&P 500 fund.  Years ago, a manager of a corporate defined benefit pension plan with an excellent long-term record had a tactical rule. In any year that he was up 20% he went to cash. This was not a market timing maneuver, he believed that earning two to three times his actuarial assumption was enough in any year. It didn’t warrant taking any additional market risk in that year. There would always be opportunities the next year, particularly if there was a flow of new money. Some investors should follow this approach with their equity investments today.
  2. Many so-called balanced funds or accounts don’t like high quality bonds. What they are holding in their fixed income allocation is meant to cushion a fall in a declining equity market. However, their fixed income allocations have assumed considerable equity type risks in currencies, high yield, or credits with very light covenants. This is particularly worrisome when the proceeds of these issues are used for increased leverage, without any substantial new earnings power being generated. Thus, many portfolios marketed as conservative investments have more than stock price risks embedded in them. Michael Cembalist of JP Morgan Asset Management is particularly concerned about leveraged loans, which are 95% covenant lite in Europe.
  3. Are we approaching a time where a radical change in thinking about future trends is required? Typically, many financial and economic organizations publish their mid to long-term forecasts over the next three months. They include forecasts on domestic and global GDP, rates of inflation, interest rates, market concentration and favored industries/individual securities. They are produced by learned individuals or teams and are based on the continuation of present trends. In other words, their forecasts are like the US Fed, “data dependent”. Odds are, many of these forecasts will be right in their extrapolations, with relatively low payoffs. They run the risk of a “Minsky Moment” after a long period of stable results. (A Minsky moment refers to a sharp decline in prevailing market sentiment and economic productivity after a long period of widespread optimism). I think we are due for such an occurrence, particularly in organizations headed by long successful leaders close to their last hurrah. Remember the planner’s curse, “Men plan and God laughs”. Looking at the composition of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, not one of the thirty names is from the original list. Even the S&P 500 index funds have annual turnover due to acquisitions or lost market capitalization. I suspect we are due for a series of unexpected surprises, suggesting that after the 2019 gains we should be willing to build opportunity reserves, not market timing reserves. A future blog will address market timing issues more fully.
“All Roads Lead to Rome” - What Chinese Emperors Learned
The critical lessons of geopolitics and their accompanying economics are driving our two modern emperors today, the leaders of China and the US. The first era they should recognize is ancient Rome, which turned the Mediterranean into a Roman lake. Their power did not rest solely on the strength of the Roman legions, but more importantly on the success of their engineers in building roads and water viaducts. These were critical in supplying their capital center with imports of grain and captured slaves.

Over the centuries the Mediterranean held the keys to other powers. It was the last leg in the importation of spices and other materials from the “silk road” to Italian City states. The 15th century Europeans realized the nautical/military power of the Chinese when their armed junks entered the old Roman lake. (Due to a sharp change in the attitude of the Chinese government, which recalled all of their navy and destroyed their ships, their Navy was largely destroyed). Soon thereafter the Dutch replaced the Portuguese as the suppliers to Europe for much of what used to come overland. The Dutch East India Company (English translation of BOR) built a fortified base in Indonesia and controlled the South China Sea and much of the Gulf of India.

These strategic lessons were not lost on the Germans. They believed that whoever controlled “The World Island” (EuroAsia including Africa) controlled the world. The US view was enunciated by Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan. (When I first read his views at Columbia I did not realize that he had spent two years there before going to the Naval Academy.) His basic view was that he who controls the seas, main islands and critical ports, controlled the world. He was particularly sensitive to “property” between 30 and 40 degrees latitude.

Underlying tension between the US and China today
I have always believed the tariff issues with China and other countries were a way to get vital national securities issues on the table. Going back to the roads of Rome, it’s apparent an empire is vitally dependent upon imports of critical supplies. (To some degree imports are dependent upon the combination of capital transfers and money earned from exports.) Unlike the US, China is much more dependent upon the import of energy, very high-quality semiconductors, and similar items, many of which are imported through the South China Sea and related bodies of water. China feels that it is a national imperative to control access to their country. Even with a fully developed “one belt, one road”, the land route is insufficient. Officially, the US is for the international right of free navigation of all major water routes. Like the Soviet Union, China wants to escape encirclement. China recognizes that at some point it may have to fight its way out of a perceived trap. In the modern world one of the weapons of choice is technology, particularly advanced semiconductors. Both sides recognize that they have attractive internal markets for other’s goods, as well as capital that can be used for their own imports. 

Investment Conclusions
We should learn from both boxers and wrestlers. In terms of tactical investment decisions, be a counter puncher looking for the rare opportunity, but as a wrestler stay engaged and use the opponent’s weight as leverage at critical points. Bottom-line looking ahead, after investing focus on up-to-date strategies, successful investing.


   
Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/07/apollo-11-investment-lessons-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/07/us-stock-markets-new-highs-misleading.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/07/twin-problems-not-enough-greed-and-too.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, March 24, 2019

The Actively Worrying Class/Passively Investing Holders - Weekly Blog # 569



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


The Actively Worrying Class/Passively Investing Holders


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –
       
                                  

In many sporting events and wars the side that talks most often exhausts themselves, or at least is constrained by their public statements. The theoretical wall of worry that bull markets climb is constructed with bricks of displayed worries. Currently, particularly for some this weekend, there is a lot to worry about. The pundits in the media and salespeople are clever annunciators of worries. As both a student of words and investors actions, I have noticed relatively few actions on the part of investors. What follows are two worries linked to two true concerns and one very current display of actions.

I share military service with the two President Bushes (Captain, USMC) and the current President, who had a secondary school military experience. Those military experiences arouse strategic considerations that all too few are paying attention to, some that threaten peace.

China
In the early part of the 20th century there was much written about global geopolitics. The German general staff believed that whoever controlled the landmass of continental Europe and Asia would control the world. US Admiral Mahon believed that whoever controlled the oceans would control the world. These beliefs are still very active in the minds of global leaders and explain much of today’s news.

Some of the investment managers we use have for decades invested in China. They believe the current government does not have territorial ambitions, but economic ambitions to be the respected as an economic leader of the world. They are very anxious to reach this point in order to avoid becoming too old before they become, on a per capita basis, rich. As is often the case, people look back on periods where things were better for them. The ancient silk road brought acknowledgement of the riches of China to the rest of the known world. China was the most advanced country in the world in terms of economics, technology, and culture.

The current Chinese leadership is rebuilding the silk road with the help of its neighbors, a land route for rail and road from China to Europe. In addition, they are equally busy building a series of sea routes and friendly ports through the South China Sea, across the Indian Ocean, and up the coast of Africa into Europe. This week’s Chinese visit was intended to establish closer trade relations between Italy and China. Remember the return of Marco Polo to Italy from China and the enormous wealth a few Italian cities earned from their trade with China. (Many years later Boston generated some of its wealth through the Clipper ship trade with China. Taking care of the wealth of successful sea captains while they were gone for periods often longer than a year was the foundation of a good bit of the trust business controlled by Boston law firms, who had their own money managers.)

I don’t know what the current President learned at the New York Military Academy or at Wharton (University of Pennsylvania), but I can share my views. The current so-called trade war with China is an attempt to modify China’s long-term strategic thinking. The first objective is to insure freedom of naval passage in the South China Sea, through which a great deal of China’s strategic imports must move. Europe is increasing its reliance on Chinese imports to meet its needs, including its technology needs. The future of technological dominance is even more important to President Trump than the naval considerations.

While China can produce low level semi-conductors, they must import the most advanced semi-conductors to meet both their industrial and military needs. These issues will soon play out in the control of space and become the point of maximum disruptive power. Thus, it was not at all surprising that the White House sought to establish a sixth independent military service, a space force. This initiative was defeated on “The Hill” and it will now be incorporated within the Air Force. In my opinion, tariffs were a means to get the Chinese to the table to resolve more strategic questions.

Answers to Productivity
Some of the best scientific and political brains have been struggling with the fact that US productivity appears to be stuck at a low level of about 1% per year. In past periods when the US was growing in the mid-single digits, productivity was growing at similar levels and for awhile reached 7%. There are at least three reasons for the slow growth. The first ties back to my education in the US Marine Corps.

For the most part the Men and women who join The Corps are no different than the general population, they are just trained better. From the very beginning they are trained in leadership, which was why I wanted to be a Marine. My desire to learn leadership skills originated one summer when I was in high school. I had a manual job in a small laboratory where I heard of the lack of leadership in the low and middle management tiers of large US companies.

A survey of US workers states that no more than 30% are engaged in what they are doing on the job. Gallup and others believe that the main fault lies with the immediate supervisor of the workers. Contrasting that with my training as a junior officer in The Corps, we learned that battles and tasks are often won by the leadership of the non-commissioned officers. These corporals and sergeants lead by example, by training, by their own discipline, and by caring for their troops. As officers our job was to support the NCOs and our Marines in any way we could. Those attitudes are not present in the supervisory workforce today. Workers need to be inspired to do their jobs better and help others in the group so that become promotable.

Another way to improve productivity is to see the challenges of automation. There are far too many articles about people being replaced by machines, an issue first raised by the Luddites attacking automation in the spinning mills. Machines are good at repetitive functions but require people to figure out how they should best be used. Like identifying the next steps in the process and how to create the need for new products and services. Perhaps there are unmet needs to re-educate workers and users, both for existing products and services and for those of the future.

A third answer is perhaps the single best way to increase productivity, through better schooling and education. The distinction between the two is that schooling is what you are taught, education is what you learn most often from life experiences outside of school.  We need to have people recognize that everyday experiences can lead to an education. The idea of a workless retirement is no longer relevant for most, as not working leads to increased spending. There is still important and fulfilling work in the charitable sector that is necessary for our society to progress.

After Worrying, Probably Do Nothing
If one looks at the last 3 days of the previous week, one can see reasons for worry. The table below shows the closing prices, price changes, and volume for Moody’s, a stock owned in our financial services fund.

Date    Price Change    % Change    Share Volume    Last Price
3/20       -1.38          -0.77       1,269,927       $177.25
3/21       +4.74          +2.67       1,700,888       $181.99
3/22       -4.10          -2.25         987,175       $177.89

Interest rates generally drive potential opportunities for Moody’s ratings on new bonds and credit instruments. On Tuesday the 19th the Federal Reserve said it was not going to raise rates, suggesting more money could be raised. By the next day some had concerns that the Fed, by not raising rates, was worried that the economy was closer to a recession. The following day sentiment changed again and the market viewed things more positively, leading the stock price to move to a new 2019 high on much better than average volume. Only to be followed by a pull-back on Friday to Thursday close, but with only 58% of Wednesday volume.

One could interpret from this tiny sample that while there are lots of things to worry about, most investors will continue to hold on to their long-term stock investments, at least for the moment. Because of the announcement on the Presidential investigation today, I expect that those with a strong view will react on Monday. My guess is that whatever happens there will be a reversal later in the week.



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/03/long-term-trends-may-not-be-friend.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-top-before-big-top-weekly-blog-567.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/03/2-speed-vs-2-directions-old-better-than.html




Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.