Showing posts with label racing luck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racing luck. Show all posts

Sunday, October 1, 2023

Prepare to be Bullish, Long-Term - Weekly Blog # 804

 



 Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Prepare to be Bullish, Long-Term

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

  

(N.B. in classical documents was a Latin warning for the reader to be prepared for elements of disbelief. Subscribers are likely to disagree with some or all points made. Nevertheless, they should be digested, even though they might question your firmly held beliefs. Some of these thoughts might even reinforce your own beliefs. In medieval courts there was often a paid clown or “fool” who might cleverly utter some thoughts that no one else would dare say. Perhaps, this is the role of this blog.)

 

Focus on the Finish Line

Almost all commentary about the market, economy, and individual prices without attempting to identify the end period outcome is lacking. One lesson from the racetrack was the order of finish from a particular race. The payoff parade was the actual running of the race, not any of guessing, analysis, or handicapping bettors did before the race.

As both an investor and a registered advisor, I attempt to make a guess at either the actual or relative return after an extended period. The minimum time period I am comfortable using to make an investment decision is five years. One reason I pick five years is a lesson learned at the track about the element of surprise, or “racing luck”, in any given race. In longer races there is greater opportunity to recover from a surprise than in shorter races. The second reason to focus on a five-year period was highlighted by the communist party. (I suspect they copied various business plans in the 19th century by instituting a 5 year political term.)  Many CEOs also negotiate a five-year term with their board of directors for incentive compensation. 

 

2028!?

Most money in the securities market is invested to meet retirement obligations or long-term capital expenditure needs. Those responsible for attempting to meet these needs should be judged by their performance over longer periods.

 

While you can never clearly identify the type of period we are presently in, I think it is the responsibility of the investor to make his/her best guess, as the type of market will probably impact the results.

 

2022 Change

While no single event is likely to change the direction of society or the economy, there is often a headline occurrence which can serve as a useful label. The single change that became a turning point for me was the COVID Pandemic. The Black Plague occurred centuries ago, and there were serious pandemics in the Spanish Flu in the1920s. However, for the most part pandemics in the modern era have been rare.

 

The reaction by the US government, led by the teachers’ union, materially changed the progress of society. Focusing exclusively on the securities markets, 2022 was a down year, due to curtailment of work and formal education. Governments rarely let a crisis go to waste and by 2023 government expenditures and curtailment of selected industries had enhanced inflation. Appropriate parallels were made with FDR’s elongation of a recession into a depression. 

 

First 9 Months of 2023

Perhaps it is ironic that little New Zealand’s central bank was the first to call for a 2% inflation goal and have its current indices generate a minus in front of them. The US may not be far behind, with Real Estate -5.4%, Consumer Staples -4.76%, Healthcare -4.09%, and most concerning, the S&P 500 equal weighted up only +1.79 %.

 

Where’s the Upside?

Almost all life is cyclical, with the largest gains resulting after major declines. The longer the current period of stagflation, the longer the hidden actions of building future earnings power will be at work.

 

On a longer-term basis, continued federal government deficits are a symptom of important twin deficits. Capable management throughout society, and the inability of the educational system to produce students suitable for current jobs. From pre-K to PhD, schools are producing unmotivated students who are ignorant of the world and irresponsible, primarily due to the views of their instructors.

 

Parents and employers are slowly exerting pressures for change, while businesses are evolving to meet the current needs of their customers. A non-recommended example is ADP, a company in our private financial services fund. The company started 74 years ago as a payroll service business. Today, with over one million clients, they have evolved into a Human Capital Management business providing a much larger contribution to their clients. 

 

The Public Accounting Oversight Board has stated that they are finding an alarming number of errors in audits. We are finding the same trend in providing many services to clients, which presents an opportunity. One other opportunity might be the mismatching of expected industrial demand for “modern” cars, data centers, and equipment to change the climate. To support these efforts there is a need for large quantities of high-grade steel production and there are no provisions to expend production.

 

Savings, possibly the biggest contributor to the value of stock prices in 2028 will be in the hands of a new generation of political leaders and managements of profits and non-profits. Hopefully they will make better decisions than in the recent past.

 

Please share with me your thoughts.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Selling: Art & Risks, Current & Later - Weekly Blog # 803

Mike Lipper's Blog: Investment Thinking During a Lull - Weekly Blog # 802

Mike Lipper's Blog: Need For a Correction Decline - Weekly Blog # 801

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, June 2, 2019

Confidence Deteriorating Normally, Recession Unavoidable - Weekly Blog # 579



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Confidence Deteriorating Normally, Recession Unavoidable


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



One investment trap is having extreme faith in historical statistical norms. This week’s numbers basket has the following negative indicators:
  1. McDonald’s was the only stock to be up in the Dow Jones Industrial Average
  2. There were 38% more Puts purchased than Calls
  3. The Delta Market Sentiment Indicator is bearish, recommending 100% cash
  4. The American Association of Individual Investors is only 25% bullish and 40% bearish
  5. The Barron’s Confidence Index favors best quality bonds over intermediate quality, a bearish signal for stocks
  6. Only 22 of the 72 weekly price indicators rose in the week
  7. Stock prices are breaking down from triple top formations, a reversal signal
  8. Of the 25 best performing mutual funds, only 5 are invested in developed markets, 10 in emerging markets, 5 in India, 4 in Latin America, and 1 in China. Of the 10 poorest performing funds, 4 are invested in Natural Resources and 3 are invested in alternatives
  9. Money Market Funds, particularly institutional funds, and other short-term funds were big beneficiaries of flows
Reactions:
Not because I am a contrarian, but I learned at the racetrack that heavily backed horses win only about one-third of the time and pay very little in exchange for their exposure to “racing luck”. Something market analysts refer to as “surprises”. With pundits generally being very responsive to the echo chamber, it is likely that there will be an increasing volume of bearish proclamations, with some of these politically motivated. They will all see a recession ahead.

They will undoubtedly be correct, there is a recession ahead. I have close to 100% confidence with that statement. Why? Because since recorded time there have been recessions, even before governments and central banks thought that they controlled rather than influenced markets. I have much more faith in the rules that govern all human and other animal behavior. Greed and Fear are two motivators embedded on the same coin. Greed is essentially the desire to acquire enough assets and/or power that one can escape the fear of insufficiency.

Recessions Are Needed
Almost every expansion, if it continues, will lead to an excess of supply and speculative behavior. When these excesses become too great, they are brutally eliminated. The emotional rule is that if my neighbor is out of work it is a recession, but when I am out of work it is a depression. (To the best of my knowledge the term depression was first used in the US in the 1930s. It is a term from psychology that describes how people feel rather than an economic condition.)

Are Excesses Big Enough for a Major Recession?
One of the lessons of history is that the many changes in fundamental condition are not generally identified before there is a decline. Today, one must look hard to find the growing imbalances that could set off a chain reaction that would bring down the economy. I don’t currently see the growth of imbalances sufficient to set off the reaction. However, the so-called immediate cause for the beginning of World War I was the assassination of the Austrian Archduke by a crazed person. Even then, it took another six months before hostilities started.

As a prudent investment manager and investor, I am always scanning for future problems that could grow large enough to start a major recession, or even a depression. There is one element that could lead to a smaller reaction. Much like the prime mortgage crisis, it has been identified by a minority of watchers, including some at the Federal Reserve. The element of concern is the growth of credit extensions by non-bank financial institutions, which have provided loans with light loan covenants. If that area blew up unexpectedly it might conceivably take 5% or less off our GDP, or one year’s growth.

Others in my cast of possible but unlikely horrors are medical, weather, or technological tragedies that we have not seen before. In this scenario actuaries have no data to guide them. I could see such an event taking a low double digit hit to global prosperity. Possible yes, but the odds are very small.

What to Do?
Because others are worried, I am less so. I view any sort of major market drop as an opportunity to find new leadership at fair prices. In the past I have missed some of these opportunities because I was waiting for truly bargain prices. I was not sufficiently aware of Charlie Munger’s fair price doctrine. There is always the risk of being too smart and out-smarting oneself. Thus, I am generally maintaining my equity positions. I will be willing to sell some of my positions in order to buy what I believe to be the new leaders when there is a double-digit breakdown.

Question of the week:
What is your intended strategy when it becomes clear to you that we are in a market breaking recession?


      
Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/05/memory-traps-judgement-weekly-blog-578.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/05/probable-view-of-next-decline-weekly_19.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/05/probable-view-of-next-decline-weekly.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, May 5, 2019

2nd of May’s Good Lessons - Weekly Blog # 575


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


2nd of May’s Good Lessons


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



The inestimable Charlie Munger has labeled Warren Buffett a learning machine, someone who is always learning from his own and other’s mistakes. This is a good model to follow. The first couple days of May provided some good classrooms, the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting and The Kentucky Derby, both on Saturday, May 4th.

The Annual Meeting/ Investment School
While many attended the meeting to gather bits of information to help guide their views as to Berkshire’s earnings and/or near-term stock price, I view it as an opportunity to learn about the art of investing. For me this is a linear progression from my Introduction to Securities Analysis course under Professor David Dodd at Columbia University. Dave Dodd was both a teaching and investment partner with Ben Graham, Warren Buffett’s first mentor. The following are the nuggets gathered from the meeting which can be applied to investing in general:
  1. Paying too much makes it very tough to make money on an investment. (They did for Kraft.)
  2. Intrinsic value is a range not a specific point. This range could be 10% plus or minus. (This is the fulcrum point for their buybacks.)
  3. Individual Investors are their preferred owners rather than bureaucratic institutions.
  4. They have a desire that their heirs hold onto their shares long after Charlie and Warren are gone. That is why they are developing the next tier of management, which will be different and better.
  5. A large opportunity reserve has two values, it cushions periodic declines and creates bargain opportunities.
  6. The allocation of resources allows them to shift capital to where it is most productive long-term.
The Kentucky Derby 
I have written about “racing luck” or surprises in the past. At this year’s running of “The Derby” we witnessed a classic example of “racing luck”. With far too many horses on a rain-soaked track there was at least one bumping incident, which the three racing stewards felt impacted the order of the finish. After reviewing many films of the race and a call to the two leading jockeys, they disqualified the winner and gave the victory to the horse that came in second. The level of surprise can be gleaned from the betting odds. The first horse to finish was the second favorite at $9 to $2. The declared winner was a $63 to $1 long-shot. This is the first time in the history of this race that they have disqualified the winner for an on-track violation.

The investment lesson from this experience is to avoid putting too much faith in the “inevitable conclusions”. Surprises do happen, even those that are the first in more than one hundred years.


The Mixed Current Picture

Change Signs?
  1. While the NASDAQ composite has gained the most since its January low, +26% compared to +17% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average and +20% for the S&P 500, this past week the 420 new highs on the NYSE exceeded the 305 new highs on the NASDAQ. Have traders shifted their focus to more industrial and  seasoned companies from growth and tech?
  2. Of the 72 price indicators tracked by the WSJ covering securities, commodities and currencies, only 30 are rising, Recently, the number of gainers were in the majority.
  3. Both High quality bonds and intermediate quality bonds gained in price, showing some shift in demand away from stocks. 


Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/04/value-investing-will-be-superior-but-it.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/04/contrarian-observations-not-predictions.html 

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/04/not-yet-peak-luck-lessons-weekly-blog.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Not Yet a Peak & Luck Lessons - Weekly Blog # 572



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Not Yet a Peak & Luck Lessons

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –
       

Absolute price tops and bottoms rarely occur. Most of the time market prices fluctuate without creating important turning points. Comments about investment markets are mainly focused on earnings and related valuations and these have not recently been helpful as guides to making investment decisions. In their place some are relying on various statistical measures of investors’ sentiments and the current somewhat bullish indicators are not generating a lot of enthusiasm. There is something absent from the picture. The stock market has been moving up for three and half months, but the volume on the New York Stock Exchange in 2019 is down -4.68%. An even better measure of short-term speculation, the NASDAQ composite, is up + 1.31%. Some short-term traders may be concerned that in March the three major stock indices had a gap in their price charts. Many market analysts believe that gaps need to be filled before a price trend can be relied upon. While no forecasting measure is ever 100% accurate all the time, I believe we have not yet reached a peak level.

Sports World Experience
One should pay attention to the importance of luck, especially in light of Tiger Woods winning “The Masters” golf championship this weekend. A remarkable comeback for him considering his physical and personal problems. Not taking anything away from the winner, but a couple of golfers that were ahead of him ran into some poor luck with a few of their strokes. In my basic investment analysis course at the racetrack I would call this “racing luck”. To me the most useful analytical time at the track is the twenty to thirty-minute period between races. This is the time during which I compare the results of the prior race against those predicted by my handicapping analysis. Most often, with the benefit of hindsight, one can find in the records of past races the reason the results turned out as they did. In the minority of instances, when the results could not have been predicted, it was the result of the record being incomplete or the result of unanticipated “racing luck”.

My Lucky Experiences
I have had two experiences that had nothing to do with my securities analysis training and certainly was not tested in my CFA exams. I would call these examples of racing luck.  
  • As a result of following closed-end funds I owned a few shares of an Eaton Vance fund who had a relationship with Winrock, the venture capital arm of the Rockefellers. They had a share interest in some of their holdings and for regulatory reasons needed to terminate it, resulting in the closed-end fund distributing ownership of those shares to its shareholders. Consequently, I own a few shares of Apple at under $1 apiece. (At some point in the distant past I sold half the position because I had enough losses in other securities to offset the large gain in Apple. VERY DUMB MOVE to let taxes dictate an investment decision, an important lesson.)
  • Many years ago I took out a life insurance policy and later realized that unless I passed prematurely it was a bad use of money. The rate of return the insurance company needed to meet its obligation was low relative to what it was earning on its investments. Thus, I bought some shares in the insurance company to take advantage of the spread and the float in the investment account. As a result, I would have a sales force working for me to find others that did not fully understand the economics of insurance. This is a lessoned not taught at Columbia. Over the years the insurance company did well but was never a high-flying stock. Recently it was bought out for cash and stock, the cash being many multiplies of my cost. Thus, I am more than satisfied. The stock is CVS Health, which I currently hold. I don’t generally directly invest in the health care industry, but let my choice of specialty and diversified mutual funds give me exposure. Barron’s recently had a cover story titled “CVS This could be the future of healthcare. Time to Buy”.  According to the article it is selling at an 8 P/E and a yield of 3.79%, which is in the range of the insurance stock I bought years ago.
Lessons
  1. As indicated, don’t let taxes alone drive investment decisions. Sell when there is a better use for the money.
  2. One needs to be invested to allow good luck to happen to one’s money. If I had to buy them independently, I probably would not have owned these winners.
  3. Over long periods of time, investing in a portfolio of equities works better than trying to time the market
  4. Cash reserves are appropriate to meet expected payments and for use as a possible opportunity reserve.

Questions of the Week:
  1. What is the range of your opportunity reserve?
  2. How long should you keep the reserve if you can’t find a commitment?


  
Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/04/investing-in-quality-for-growth-or.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/03/investment-committee-and-investors-be.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-actively-worrying-classpassively.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, March 18, 2018

Investors Need to be Wrong to be Right – Weekly Blog # 515


Introduction

Investing is an art not a science. In science the search is for a repeatable answer under every identified condition. As strong as it may seem to many, the search is not in the end the largest performance number. The search is the delivery of the required funds to meet the accepted needs of the beneficiaries; be they institutions or individuals investing within the realms of prudence. Thus, the investment manager’s primary function is to aid in the feeling of the well-being of the beneficiary. According to a recent report on happiness as applied to nations, well-being is based on income, healthy life expectancy, social support, freedom, trust, and generosity. It is far easier to contribute to well-being through sound investing. I believe our clients hire us to provide sound investments for them in order to accomplish their well-being. Thus far I have been able to deliver. But much of this is not based on the certainty of math and science that I learned in school and university, but as a handicapper at the New York racetracks. From an investment standpoint what I learned at the track that is useful can be summarized as follows:

1.  The objective is not to win every race but to finish the day as a winner (including expenses).

2.  Don’t bet on every race, there could even be days when no bets are made as the payoff odds are not appropriate to the probabilities foreseen.

3.  Occasionally the most popular bet is logical in terms of expected results, but the payoffs are too low because it doesn’t take into consideration what can be called “racing luck.” At these times it could make sense to invest in the second or third most logical horse if they are being offered at reasonable odds for second or third place and turn into larger money makers if racing luck overcomes the favorite. This is a good bet as favorites rarely win, even half the time.

4.  After concluding the most logical result, the real analysis begins, which is how much should be bet on this horse in this race? Weighting one’s bets can make the difference of a nice win vs loss record and walking away as a winner for the day.

5.  Accepting that I was wrong an uncomfortable number of times, but learning from the experience by re-examining both my analysis and how I handled my money and to a lesser degree my expenses.

Thus, I believe that, like other investors, I will be wrong in terms of market direction, sectors, “factors” and selections. To defend our beneficiaries’ interests I have adopted a policy of having a number of different bets at the same time, but with the recognition that unlike at the track where races end, the investment process continues through many cyclical periods.

“Goldilocks” May Be Leaving

Liz Ann Sonders of Charles Schwab among others is raising concerns about the future. After all, for at least nine years it has been somewhat easy to ride the secular rise in the US stock market. (Shorter periods for other stock markets.) This issue brings up a number of questions: evidence of impending change and what should be the correct investment policy going forward. In terms of evidence of impending change there are two important elements:  flows into stocks are from traders not investors and credits may be mispriced leading to fixed income not providing stable values. This week some in the press for the first time are heralding significant flows into the equity market from “funds”, which shows the Public is buying the current conditions. The truth, according to Thomson Reuters’ Lipper Inc., is that $20.4 Billion came in net, but $18.7 Billion went into domestic oriented ETFs with $8.2 Billion going into the SPDR S&P 500 and $3.1 Billion into PowerShares (Invesco*) QQQ. Both of these are favorites of hedge funds and other traders. In numerous cases ETFs and ETNs are being used by these players as substitutes for futures which are more expensive. I am noting that a number of investors have sold short some ETFs that represent over 10% of their assets and in at least one case over 100%. What may be more disturbing is that a number of independent investment advisors and a number of advisors working through brokerage firms are managing discretionary accounts exclusively in ETFs/ETNs. Some of these are probably good, but I suspect many do not have any successful background in market trends, sectors, “factors” and the selection of individual securities. They may be, along with others, contributing to a much higher turnover rate in ETF/ETN portfolios than conventional mutual funds.

*Invesco is held in a private Financial services fund and personal accounts that I manage.

Credit Concerns

Remember that most significant stock market declines begin after a period of fixed income market declines. Through March 15th most bond funds are showing a slightly negative total return, which includes both their income and their market movement. The only domestic groups that are not negative are loan participation funds, some specialized credit vehicles, and ultra short maturity funds. I don’t know when the next recession will commence, but I expect it will be within this first term of the President. I do know that during a recession bankruptcies and other financial difficulties occur and they are not being priced into the market. Institutional term loans are being priced at only 3.2% above prime corporates, compared with 3.1 % before the crisis that began in 2007-8. Further, while banks have much more capital than they did before the last crisis, their book of derivatives is somewhat higher.

In a talk at a Futures conference last week, my old friend Tom Russo, formerly General Counsel to Lehman Brothers, mentioned that when a counter-party believes it was duped, the entire class may be considered illegal as an auditor will have difficulty claiming the asset is worth 100 cents on the dollar. He said, according to the Financial Times, that “when you owe a little bit you call your bank - when you owe a lot you call your lawyer. “A good bit of derivatives are directly or indirectly financed through the credit market.

What Should Investors Be Doing Now?

There is no special reason for long-term investment policy to be changed as long as it contemplates that there will be periodic market declines. This is similar to money that is invested in what we label Legacy and Endowment Timespan L Portfolios®. For those with a shorter focus of at least five years, they should be making two lists of equities and equity managers.

The first list should be of items that at higher prices would become risky if the general stock market rises at a rapid rate. (There is some chance of this happening as new money rushes in on the basis of buy-the-dip or FOMO fear of missing out.) The risk is that such a surge most often leads to a major fall, which could lead to structural changes. The second list should be labeled “Hopefully not to be used, but probably will be.” It is a list of sound companies and managers who may be slightly damaged in a decline but will survive and prosper. Both of these lists should have names and prices scaled to avoid emotional price reactions. Five or ten price points could be prudent.
__________
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left margin of Mikelipper.Blogspot.com

Copyright ©  2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Good Investment Outcomes Can Lead to Poor Investment Results



Introduction

In last week's post I mentioned that much of what I have learned about investment analysis I learned at the racetrack, and that a bet on California Chrome while understandable, was a bad bet from a rate of return basis. Some have asked me what about handicapping, the term used for analyzing horse races that I find so appealing. My initial response was that within the half hour between races one could make a thought-out decision and shortly thereafter you learned whether you were right.

As with most rapid response answers this one was not fully responsive for it focused only on results. The real benefit from handicapping races at the track, particularly with knowledgeable other people, is not about their choices but rather observing their well-reasoned thinking. After the race there was often a post-mortem on what we did not fully appreciate in the past performance tables we studied. In the case of the Belmont Stakes the very fast workout a few days before the race by California Chrome was combined with the fact that the eventual winner was more rested than the favorite, as it did not run in the Kentucky Derby. Another item that should have factored in the analysis was that there were a few more horses entered in the race than normal for the Belmont.

The above elements give greater depth to the results. Many who will follow the favorite's future races will focus only on the disappointing results or blame the jockey for a bad ride; for instance California Chrome’s jockey who described his colt as "empty" when he urged a final stretch run. I would suggest that when rested at equal weights California Chrome will be difficult to beat in the future. (Until we get more current information.)

The failure to separate outcomes from critical analysis   

A quick focus on outcomes is often used to confirm one's own thinking without looking at it as an opportunity to search for other elements of useful wisdom. One of the differences between a number of investment committees and professional investors is that investment committees want simple definitive answers that they can extrapolate into the future. The manager or fund that did not meet or beat the assigned benchmark failed, and should be replaced in favor of more promising candidates. Races are often won or lost due to the unexpected element of “racing luck” which is unlikely to be repeated in the future.

Avoiding habit-based decisions

In the current market environment of an aging bull market (980 trading days without a 10% correction), “racing luck” might be attributed to an unexpected merger or acquisition announcement. Just as a professional jockey keeps his mount out of trouble and does not fruitlessly exhaust his/her horse, a prudent portfolio manager exercises appropriate risk management. Good jockeys don't run every race the same way. They avoid habit-based decisions in trying to find new ways to win races.

In looking at various races one should be looking for what is the preferred length of the race for each horse in the race. Some are very good at short distances and try to hold on for mid distance races. Others are using a race as a warm up for a richer, longer race in the future.

Parsing the analyses

As subscribers to these posts have learned, I am a believer in breaking up a single portfolio into at least four sub-portfolios based on the expected time-span to meet the investor’s and particularly the institution's needs.

The definitions to the four Time-span Fund Portfolios are listed in my blog post last week, click here to read.

If one assigns each position to one of the sub portfolios then one can make a more incisive analysis as to whether the securities’ results are likely to be delivered against the needs of the account. Just as at the track one should separate sprinters from middle distant and longer race horses.

Another factor that one can take away from the track (particularly when looking at fillies and mares) is whether they may be good brood mares. Many believe that the male line provides the stamina and the female line the racing ability. Numerous individual and institutional investors want to hire a manager that will work with them for many years or a couple of generations. Thus, they should look at the ability to develop replacements for their key players which should include portfolio managers, analysts, traders, critical administrative personnel, and beyond.   

Other sources of good and bad investment results

If the only source of investment expertise is distilled from going to the races, there would be huge crowds at all the tracks all the time rather than the sparse crowds that normally show up. One contribution to another important element can be gleaned from a Barron's
article by Stephen Mauzy, who I don't know. In his article he describes investing as entrepreneurial rather than formula driven. He suggests while risk could be considered probabilistic, uncertainty is where the opportunities lie. The entrepreneur type of mind is used to dealing with uncertainty and the good ones thrive on it. We prefer, when possible, to invest with managers that are entrepreneurial in nature and in shops of a similar nature.

The source of what may turn out badly are some very bright people who are quite numeric, according to a New York Times interview, where the subject stated, "There's a lot of behavioral psychology around the fact that the smarter you are, the easier it is for you to make up metrics that make you think you are doing the right thing.” 

The biggest risk: the Operational (Cash) Portfolio

There is not meant to be any risk or at least very little in the most secure of the four Time-span Portfolios, the Operational Cash Portfolio. While we are used to taking risks in venture or disruptive type equity portfolios, we believe that our operational needs are completely secure in the portfolio that is set-up to fund immediate needs. The problem is as long as the Federal Reserve and other Central Banks keep manipulating interest rates so short-term interest rates are close to nil, there will be experimentation at getting elevated rates on this supposedly secure money. Probably nothing will happen, but even a potential loss of one to five cents on the dollar will cause a great deal of stress on the operating people in the family or non-profit institution. The stress from this disappointment is likely to be more intensively felt than the satisfaction from prior gains achieved from stretching. In the real world this is the difference between genuine analysis and outcome focus. So be careful, particularly now.

Whether your observe Fathers Day or not, as with horses we all have gotten a great deal from our fathers which I hope you celebrate. 

How are you safe-guarding your short-term capital accounts? 
 __________________
Comment or email me a question to MikeLipper@Gmail.com .

Did you miss Mike Lipper’s Blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com 

Copyright © 2008 - 2014
A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.