Showing posts with label Global growth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Global growth. Show all posts

Sunday, October 23, 2022

Current and Future Views are Confusing - Weekly blog # 756

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Current and Future Views are Confusing


 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

            

 

 

Current Sentiment Too Bearish?

Perhaps it is a COVID hangover or just the collection of largely negative inputs, but the numbers appear to be too negative. As a relative long-shot player, the growing number of largely negative elements suggests crowding, which is normally wrong.

 

To me, the single biggest negative for the next year or so is China. Looking at both US and Global Growth, if China can't grow 5%, can the rest of the world grow 3%. In my opinion, the key is whether the Chinese government will let its private sector expand at a 5 % annual rate.

 

Historically, one of the best guides to US consumer growth is how well Whirlpool (*) is doing. They have just announced a material cutback in domestic expectations, among others doing the same.

(*) A very long-term personal holding that has paid for lots of appliances over the years.

 

Last week, more US stocks rose more than fell. While the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) rose +8.21%, the more significant S&P 500 gained +4.91%.  This suggests more interest from the public/wealth management retail managers than from institutional money. Traditional market analysts have been waiting for the latter group to finally dump their holdings.

 

A possible answer to global inflation is only likely when severe and growing economic/social imbalances are addressed. This requires finding appropriate compromises, with solutions not likely to be acceptable to all. What magnifies the problem is envy, not the differences between people.

 

The genius of l776 was not the beginning of the American Revolution, but Adam Smith's publication of "The Wealth of Nations". Adam Smith made the point that nations can possess superior trade talents. They can and should trade with each other, valuing their respective superior skills. He was in favor of utilizing specialization as the source of trading profits.

 

Smith’s view is what made trade between the United Kingdom and the American colonies work. That is, until the Home Country wanted the Colonies to pay for their own defense and administration. Instead of allowing the Colonies to develop more of their own services and leadership, they imposed the cost of the most expensive army and navy in the world on them. Failure to allow the Colonies the opportunity to command was a classic failure of geo-politics.

 

Geo-politics is the art of various political forces cooperating to accomplish their own goals. Since the first development of armed forces, neighboring power centers could either fight each other or trade harmoniously. Early in the development of the single land mass encompassing the connected parts of Europe and Asia. Largely due to the military power of mounted troops.

 

Asia was conquered by the Mongol tribes as they pushed both south and west, occupying much of today's Russia, China, and India. Russia and China pushed back, with Napoleon and Hitler later trying unsuccessfully to push back further. Ukraine was an independent and viable state at times, with a significant population of Tartars. Stalin largely moved the Tartars out when he was in control. Through time Ukraine developed its own culture and religion. They also developed great scientific and mathematical skills.

 

Western European countries in search of raw materials developed African and Asian colonies. Germany only became unified later and had few opportunities to acquire foreign colonies. They accepted Britain's rule of the waves until roughly the middle of the 19th century. At which time, Then, German Admiral van Tirpitz began building up their fleet to become the second largest. He along with the German general’s staff also developed their geo-political thinking, analyzing both the land and sea battles of the American Civil War.

 

Although the American navy fleet was a poor third, President Teddy Roosevelt had it tour the world after the Spanish American War in the early years of the new century. American foreign policy pivots on domestic politics, with a strong tendency toward being isolationist. However, as early as 1890, American Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan advocated for the US Navy controlling the open seas by forcing its way into various seaports and channels. He foresaw the eventual decline of the royal navy.

 

After "TRs" presidency, the US isolationist attitude of Presidents Taft and Wilson caused the USN's budget to be reduced. Furthermore, under Wilson the US stayed out of WWI until 1916. This probably sped-up the Russian Revolution and reduced the US' s practical role in the peace treaty. The consequence of which led to the beginning of WWII and our unpreparedness for the war, particularly with submarines.

 

Going back to Adam Smith's views, you do not need to go through naval and military adventures to establish sensible trade negotiations, as long as you have the desire and skill to accomplish them.

 

Applying these efforts to Ukraine is of greater importance today than in the past. Ukraine is one of the key players controlling the Black Sea, the location of Russia's only warm water port. As a result of the breakup of the Soviet Union, Kazakhstan and a number of other former Soviet Union independent mid-continent states want to export their mineral wealth and energy through the Caspian Sea and various pipelines. Additionally, Kazakhstan has a global airport with good connections to Asia and Europe. China on the other hand is counting on its rail connections to move freight into Europe and beyond.

 

The above history and its potential impact on the world advocates for the US needing to play a strong partner role in Ukraine and the mid­continent. Thus, I expect we will be there for a long time.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/10/fundamental-changes-occurring-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/10/are-we-there-yet-weekly-blog-754.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/10/begin-to-dollar-cost-average-equity.html

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

  

Sunday, June 20, 2021

50% Humility & Search for New Money Standard - Weekly Blog # 686

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


50% Humility & Search for New Money Standard

(Caution: Few may totally agree, but all should view as possible)


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




Top- Down Week:

Two messages from Washington this week; humility and arrogance. This week, the Chair of the Federal Reserve Board in effect recognized the need to show humility. Faced with the COVID-19 Pandemic and excessive lockdowns, the Fed recognized its all-important research/prediction process was significantly inaccurate in judging the economy and inflation. To me, this recognition is much more important than the “Dot Plots” prediction of two rate increases in 2023. As an investor/portfolio manager/analyst and handicapper, I believe “two in ’23 is a bad bet, partially due to the actions and attitudes emanating from The White House. 

There is the just doing the opposite attitude by the current repeat tenants of The White House. In terms of improving relations with China, the stated purpose of the meeting in Alaska, US Foreign Policy was a failure. The same game plan was used in the meetings with the G-7, NATO, and President Putin. The goal of all was to influence the domestic consumption of post meeting press conferences, not to conduct any substantive negotiations. Since the beginning of meetings between adversaries, successful meetings were generally held in private. At these meetings, disagreements between parties were often worked out and largely settled, with the participants being critical contributors in the negotiations, not props for press releases. 

Connected to the discussion with Russian President was a set of clues that would perhaps benefit the Russian economy. By further increasing the price of oil the occupants of The White House are, or are planning to, reduce the production of US energy. This may be why they turned down a critical way to pay for part of the proposed infrastructure bill by indexing the federal gasoline tax. Seems a strange way to address the exploding inflation issue.


Reactions: 

As few if any buyers or sellers offer affidavits as to why they have bought or sold a security, we don’t really know the real cause of transactions. The best we can do is use circumstantial evidence and we have learned how wrong conclusions from such evidence can be. The following is a list of reactions, from the simplest and most current to historical and future generational extrapolations.

  1. The traditional slowdown in trading, particularly on Fridays, with summer apparently starting earlier this year.
  2. Individual investors and inexperienced wealth managers have focused on the Dow Jones Industrial Average fall of -3.45%, compared to the smaller decline of -1.91% for the more institutionally oriented investment focused S&P 500. The savviest traders who predominate the NASDAQ only experienced a fall of -0.28%, suggesting the DJIA decline was driven by disappointing reactions to media pundits press conferences. This was particularly true on Friday as traders unloaded their positions they did not want to carry over the weekend. Friday's downside relative to upside volume on the NYSE was six times greater than the 2.5 times on the NASDAQ.
  3. There were relatively few price gainers for the week, most being tech-oriented growth stocks, with particular focus on internet related firms. These gains were generated in spite of largely Democratic members of Congress calling for the breakup of the large tech companies. Based on history, many smaller companies and users of tech would suffer, potentially causing a switch to growth from value/industrial companies where valuations are one half or less. Value stocks have been performing better than growth for a while. Is it possible that the aggregate market demand switch is saying that growth will produce higher returns than value over the long-term? One could take that point of view based on the expected future actions of politicians and the "Fed". The weekend roster of weekly prices across many sectors showed 86% going down.
  4. Some may be seeing the probability of more expensive energy retarding global growth.
  5. The rising interest in actual and synthetic gold reflects concerns related to the value of currency. The "gold standard" worked for thousands of years, although that was in a world where physical assets were the primary measure of wealth. The private sector holds gold as a hedge against the historic tendency of governments to reduce the amount of gold backing money. Today, most currencies are not significantly backed by gold or hard tradeable assets. These fiat currencies are increasingly issued by autocratic governments with substantial debts who benefit from inflation. Governments with substantial debts benefit from inflation increasing taxes and reducing the "real costs" of repayment. We have experienced governments attempting to deny ownership of gold in the private sector. Those who own actual or synthetic gold expect the prices of their assets to go up and become the real backing for the currency. I question that we have entered a world where we pay considerably more for services than hard assets. At some point I suspect bundles of service contracts will be the backing for our currencies. These include medical contracts, protection contracts, travel contracts, use of location contracts (homes and facilities) and others including military contacts. (Remember, the American Revolution had European mercenaries. The current administration is removing ours in the Middle East and wants higher compensation for our forces in Europe and Korea.) We are closer than we realize to a service-contract oriented wealth system.

We congratulate all the fathers for their good choices who spent time with their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and other relatives on Sunday.




Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/06/to-benefit-long-term-investors-invert.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/06/history-good-lessons-not-great.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/05/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings_30.html




Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.