Sunday, October 23, 2022

Current and Future Views are Confusing - Weekly blog # 756

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Current and Future Views are Confusing


 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

            

 

 

Current Sentiment Too Bearish?

Perhaps it is a COVID hangover or just the collection of largely negative inputs, but the numbers appear to be too negative. As a relative long-shot player, the growing number of largely negative elements suggests crowding, which is normally wrong.

 

To me, the single biggest negative for the next year or so is China. Looking at both US and Global Growth, if China can't grow 5%, can the rest of the world grow 3%. In my opinion, the key is whether the Chinese government will let its private sector expand at a 5 % annual rate.

 

Historically, one of the best guides to US consumer growth is how well Whirlpool (*) is doing. They have just announced a material cutback in domestic expectations, among others doing the same.

(*) A very long-term personal holding that has paid for lots of appliances over the years.

 

Last week, more US stocks rose more than fell. While the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) rose +8.21%, the more significant S&P 500 gained +4.91%.  This suggests more interest from the public/wealth management retail managers than from institutional money. Traditional market analysts have been waiting for the latter group to finally dump their holdings.

 

A possible answer to global inflation is only likely when severe and growing economic/social imbalances are addressed. This requires finding appropriate compromises, with solutions not likely to be acceptable to all. What magnifies the problem is envy, not the differences between people.

 

The genius of l776 was not the beginning of the American Revolution, but Adam Smith's publication of "The Wealth of Nations". Adam Smith made the point that nations can possess superior trade talents. They can and should trade with each other, valuing their respective superior skills. He was in favor of utilizing specialization as the source of trading profits.

 

Smith’s view is what made trade between the United Kingdom and the American colonies work. That is, until the Home Country wanted the Colonies to pay for their own defense and administration. Instead of allowing the Colonies to develop more of their own services and leadership, they imposed the cost of the most expensive army and navy in the world on them. Failure to allow the Colonies the opportunity to command was a classic failure of geo-politics.

 

Geo-politics is the art of various political forces cooperating to accomplish their own goals. Since the first development of armed forces, neighboring power centers could either fight each other or trade harmoniously. Early in the development of the single land mass encompassing the connected parts of Europe and Asia. Largely due to the military power of mounted troops.

 

Asia was conquered by the Mongol tribes as they pushed both south and west, occupying much of today's Russia, China, and India. Russia and China pushed back, with Napoleon and Hitler later trying unsuccessfully to push back further. Ukraine was an independent and viable state at times, with a significant population of Tartars. Stalin largely moved the Tartars out when he was in control. Through time Ukraine developed its own culture and religion. They also developed great scientific and mathematical skills.

 

Western European countries in search of raw materials developed African and Asian colonies. Germany only became unified later and had few opportunities to acquire foreign colonies. They accepted Britain's rule of the waves until roughly the middle of the 19th century. At which time, Then, German Admiral van Tirpitz began building up their fleet to become the second largest. He along with the German general’s staff also developed their geo-political thinking, analyzing both the land and sea battles of the American Civil War.

 

Although the American navy fleet was a poor third, President Teddy Roosevelt had it tour the world after the Spanish American War in the early years of the new century. American foreign policy pivots on domestic politics, with a strong tendency toward being isolationist. However, as early as 1890, American Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan advocated for the US Navy controlling the open seas by forcing its way into various seaports and channels. He foresaw the eventual decline of the royal navy.

 

After "TRs" presidency, the US isolationist attitude of Presidents Taft and Wilson caused the USN's budget to be reduced. Furthermore, under Wilson the US stayed out of WWI until 1916. This probably sped-up the Russian Revolution and reduced the US' s practical role in the peace treaty. The consequence of which led to the beginning of WWII and our unpreparedness for the war, particularly with submarines.

 

Going back to Adam Smith's views, you do not need to go through naval and military adventures to establish sensible trade negotiations, as long as you have the desire and skill to accomplish them.

 

Applying these efforts to Ukraine is of greater importance today than in the past. Ukraine is one of the key players controlling the Black Sea, the location of Russia's only warm water port. As a result of the breakup of the Soviet Union, Kazakhstan and a number of other former Soviet Union independent mid-continent states want to export their mineral wealth and energy through the Caspian Sea and various pipelines. Additionally, Kazakhstan has a global airport with good connections to Asia and Europe. China on the other hand is counting on its rail connections to move freight into Europe and beyond.

 

The above history and its potential impact on the world advocates for the US needing to play a strong partner role in Ukraine and the mid­continent. Thus, I expect we will be there for a long time.

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/10/fundamental-changes-occurring-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/10/are-we-there-yet-weekly-blog-754.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/10/begin-to-dollar-cost-average-equity.html

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

  

No comments: