Showing posts with label Warren Buffet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Warren Buffet. Show all posts

Sunday, January 26, 2025

Roundtable Discussion - Weekly Blog # 873

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Roundtable Discussion

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

We at Lipper Advisory Services feel a deep duty to all of our clients and those for whom we have an investment responsibility. I’m currently taking advantage of a visit from my son Steve to collaborate and will be working with Steve and Hylton to produce this week’s blog. Most money invested in the United States and many other countries is for long-term purposes. While the media focusses on short term results, we tend to look long-term and only use short-term inputs if it helps in making long-term decisions.

One of the critical determinants of investment results is the size and nature of the population. Recently, the Congressional Budget Office issued a long-term forecast on the size of the population that was lower than prior forecasts. This is very important but it is only one of several critical forces that will produce results. One of my concerns is that most populations will shrink and only a few countries will enjoy future population growth. The real force that will drive investment results will be the thinking of not only investment professionals but also of investors. 


In this light I am personally very concerned that most educational systems operating in the world are producing poor results in terms of preparing people to produce adequate lifetime savings. These issues start from pre-K through PhD education. This issue is especially important because most people generate the bulk of their savings through their work efforts.

    

I think that there will be some tremendous investment opportunities over the next ten years but wonder how the median member of the population will do. My concern is that few will be prepared with the necessary thinking, savings and discipline to identify and take advantage of these opportunities.

 

My path as an investor

To the extent that I have done reasonably well as an investor, it’s because I have stayed within a zone that I understand reasonably well. Warren Buffet calls this a “circle of competence”. I tend to focus on areas that other people are not focused on. However, there’s a challenge in that most of the areas not being followed actively are currently unattractive investment opportunities. An investor needs to bring something else to identify real opportunities. They need some in-depth understanding of the reality of the underlying business. That being said, it’s possible some opportunities will be in securities markets and countries I have not had direct experience with.  

 

I hope that Hylton and Steve will share what they are thinking about concerning these issues. It will be a source of future guidance. 

 

 

Steven Lipper

I agree that both demographics and education are important factors for long term investors to consider. My father has trained me well as a contrarian thinker. I think demographics running in the opposite direction of the typical view is an important issue for equity investors. It’s inarguable that a country’s long term economic grow is tied to its population growth (more precisely, to total hours worked, but that’s another topic). 

 

But as equity investors we are not buying future economic growth we are buying future profit growth.  There’s a counter-intuitive dynamic I’ve seen as a small company investor. When there’s a shortage of labor business owners invest more in productivity enhancing processes and equipment. They are forced to do this in order to meet rising orders with a flat employment base. And that increased productivity often increases profits, stocks prices, and workers income. So, as an equity investor I am not pessimistic about the lower projected growth rate of many countries’ populations. Differences in results will come from how countries incentivize investment. 

 

With regard to education there’s much to say but let me focus on the investment implications and opportunities resulting from disappointments in our education system. I expect that for most people post-secondary “education” will evolve to having a greater focus on certification. By certification I mean learnable skills which are in demand by employers and can be verified through testing. These certifications, if awarded by respected organizations, are valuable signals that employers can use to reduce risk in the hiring process. 

 

Certifications also benefit from the dynamism of market forces as in-demand skills will translate to in-demand certifications, providing signals to people to add those certifications. The expanding pool of people with in-demand skills will in turn support companies’ growth and people’s opportunities. I also expect on-line certifications to be less prone to many of the scandals of on-line colleges, as there will be a clear standard and a faster feedback loop. Some investment opportunities should be available for innovators in this area. 

 

Hylton Phillips-Page

Sadly, young people today save very little. Reasons for the lack of savings range from simply being unable to make ends meet to a sense of entitlement for a certain lifestyle. We live in a world where the pace of technological change is both exciting and terrifying at the same time. Technology will allow us to solve many of life’s problems but will also cause significant dislocations in society as robots and automation replace many human functions. Those jobs will likely be replaced by different types of jobs, as they have in the past. Keeping abreast of the opportunities and the skills needed for them is perhaps the best advice we can give to young people preparing for the workplace. This is a time where savings would be helpful, as young people will need all the help they can get in preparing for a future which requires an ever-changing skill set.

 

For those with investable cash it could be an exciting opportunity to invest in those companies leading the change. We are at a major inflection point in history, similar to the industrial revolution or the introduction of the internet. Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics will significantly improve productivity and change the way we approach solving these problems. They will of course improve corporate profits too. Quantum computing is at an early stage of development, promising to solve problems in a fraction of the time it takes today. Increased energy needs will be at the center of it all, as (AI) requires as much as five times the energy of a search not using AI. Last but not least, we have a new political administration promising to reduce regulation and speed up the investment and development process. So, there are a number of force multipliers all occurring at roughly the same time.

 

However, you should be aware of the challenges of investing in technology stocks.

  • One of the biggest challenges is an even better technology coming along and making your technology obsolete.
  • The technology could fail to live up to expectations.
  • There is often a first mover advantage that makes it difficult for others to follow.
  • There are a number of very large and well-funded technology companies that have the resources to be in any business they desire by investing. They will likely have more money and resources to invest than small start-ups. If all else fails, they often buy out the competition.  

 

The dominant performance of the “magnificent seven” is perhaps symptomatic of this change occurring in the market today. However, there are also many smaller companies embracing new technologies and they are likely to emerge as leaders in the future. Successful investing requires keeping abreast of the companies best adapting to the future. Professional portfolio managers and research analysts are in the best position to identify them. 

 

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: New World Rediscovered - Weekly Blog # 872

Mike Lipper's Blog: Navigating a New Investment Landscape Amid Political and Structural Challenges - Weekly Blog # 871

Mike Lipper's Blog: Unclear Data Mostly Bearish, but Bullish Later - Weekly Blog # 870



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, September 8, 2024

Investors Focus on the Wrong Elements - Weekly Blog # 853

 


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Investors Focus on the Wrong Elements

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Combing Mr. Buffett with Albert Einstein

Compound interest, the eighth wonder of the world, is wrongly attributed to Einstein according to the people at Caltech. Nevertheless, Warren Buffet stated, “He who understands it (compound interest) earns it. He who doesn’t pays it.” The better long-term investor understands it and uses it in drawing up his/her long-term strategy.

 

I have tended to use a long-term lens in my lifetime focus on mutual funds. My particular focus is the long-term, the ten-year record of the average performance of 30 equity fund indices for the last 10 years through August. Of the 30 only 7 had double digit returns, the highest being Health/Biotech which rose 15.67%. I also looked at the 25 largest stock mutual funds for 5 years, 17 of which produced double digit returns, with only one reaching the twenty percent level. It was Invesco QQQ Trust, which gained 21.30%.

 

This research reminds me of one pension plan a number of years ago which sold all its equities when the portfolio was up 20%. It was one of the best performing pension funds. Strange for me considering my background to suggest that superior performance could well be a signal to reduce investment. I say this knowing that every few years there is a period when one or more funds gain 100%. Strangely, none of these wonders makes the best performing list for the five or ten-year period.


The Media and Frequent Statements by Pundits

Traditionally, media outlets get more attention when the news is bad.   However, in covering the market and economy there is much space devoted to “happy news”. What seems particularly true is headline editors, correspondents, and allocators of space/minutes seem to share a single political view. It is occasionally worth reading to the end of an article where the other point of view gets some exposure. Operating margins for news distributors are under pressure, which has led to surveys where the number of people polled is only between 1,000 and 1,500. This might be okay, except that many people on the right don’t trust polls and media related agencies and thus do not participate in polls, often causing the prediction of incorrect election results.

 

What Should We Be Following

  • Unlike the current situation in the US, many nations are seeing younger people move up. This is particularly true in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia.
  • China is exporting surplus steel, which amounts to half of what they produce
  • Our Presidential election on both sides exaggerates
  • their commitment to integrity
  • The pouring of money into small company start-ups will curtail the future of small business capital formation. The odds of repaying these loans and other bribes will probably be similar to the repayment of student debts. The unstated purpose of these programs is to hurt the families and friends of the would-be entrepreneur.

 

What elements are you watching to help make decisions about the two apparently unrelated games, equity markets and economy? How will global problems impact them?

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Lessons From Warren Buffett - Weekly Blog # 852

Mike Lipper's Blog: Understand Numbers Before Using - Weekly Blog # 851

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Strategic Art of Strategic Selling - Weekly Blog # 850



 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, May 19, 2024

The Most Dangerous Message - Weekly Blog # 837

 

         


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

The Most Dangerous Message

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

 

       

The Most Dangerous Message is one ignored. It appears most institutional and individual investors are doing just that and are being rewarded for taking increased risks. The worst one can say about a professional is that they were unaware of a potential problem. Almost every major disaster has had a tiny preview of a small event/planned rehearsal, or a curious outsider identifying a possible future action.

 

I recently noticed the following observations pointing directly to a future major decline in market prices. The observations are in no special order. Most important at this level of analysis is whether the expected coming recession is secular or structural. A structural recession is usually driven by the mistakes made by those in authority reacting to a secular recession, who then turn it into a structural recession as FDR did.

                  

 Observations That Could Predict Problems

  1. Deere reduced its full year outlook due to soft demand for farm equipment. (In the 1920s many sectors leveraged their capital equipment expenditures. The farming sector was the first to “top out”. This caused many local farm banks to fail, which in turn strained regional bank resources. Today the farm sector is a much smaller percentage of GDP, and banks are better reserved. I wonder if AI expenditures could run ahead of derived revenues today, and more likely in the future.)
  2. We are in a phase where numerous CEOs are being replaced. Others will likely follow, with many of the replacements wanting to establish themselves as effective change agents. This translates over time into massive spending. This week a new CEO of Vanguard was announced. Based on his history at BlackRock and a prior period with McKinsey he is likely to be a spender. The risk is that some of his new efforts, at least in the earlier years, will not be cash positive. JP Morgan Chase will likely be finding a replacement for Jaime Dimon’s twin roles. I wonder if the board will initially give her/him the same latitude Jaime earned. While Greg Abel has been promoted to the number two position at Berkshire Hathaway, he is much more an operator than Charley Munger, the former great number two. I suspect the new number two will move up to CEO, pushing some of the more than 60 chiefs of the operating companies to be more aggressive. While Goldman Saks’ stock is flying this year, the number of senior partners leaving suggests they are not a totally happy shop. It would not surprise me if David Solomon was to divide both the Chairmen and CEO positions within 5 years. (The securities of these companies are all owned for clients and personal accounts). While it is never wise to attempt to copy a successful investor, one can learn from some of their actions. Warren Buffet, an enthusiastic investor in Apple*, cut some of the number one holding in his portfolio. He is afraid of a sharp increase in capital gains tax rates and is not alone in having this concern. Others are additionally worried about income taxes, death taxes, and corporate taxes. Chris Davis, the CEO of Davis Funds, recently sold a portion of the group’s largest holdings, mostly financials. (I briefly worked for his dad when we were both at the Bank of New York). * Owned in personal accounts
  3. This week there were approximately 3 times the number of index puts than the prior week, while the volatility index (VIX) was roughly 60% of what it was a year ago.
  4. Only one stock market index fell out of the 32 indices produced by S&P Dow Jones, the UK Titans 50 Index. It only fell 0.30%.
  5. The spread between the best and worst performing indices was much narrowed than usual, +2.97% vs -058%. Not much of an opportunity to successfully trade in what was thought to be a good environment after the indices hit record levels.
  6. Industrial products prices on a year-to-date basis rose +5.66%, while employment cost gained +4.83 %. Perhaps the next stop is somewhere between the two.
  7. According to the WSJ, since 2020 teachers have become more lenient, allowing grades to rise at the very same time test scores were dropping. This could be a contributor to productivity falling and the inability to find qualified workers. The military is also struggling to enroll needed forces.
  8. China’s economy is rising at roughly twice the US rate.
  9. Moody’s noted that opportunistic issuers took advantage of tight credit spreads. I wonder if rates rose while real fundamentals fell.

 

Please share the observations you think are important.


Notice to subscribers

Next week’s blog will be produced on Memorial Day.

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Trade, Invest, and/or Sell - Weekly Blog # 836

Mike Lipper's Blog: Secular Investment Religions - Weekly Blog # 835

Mike Lipper's Blog: Avoiding Many Mistakes - Weekly Blog # 834

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.



Sunday, May 5, 2024

Secular Investment Religions - Weekly Blog # 835

 

         


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Secular Investment Religions

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       


Timing of Views

Apple announced its first calendar report this week, continuing a pattern of declining comparative quarters, albeit with a smaller percentage decline and slower sales of its latest iPhone model. Later in the week Berkshire Hathaway reported its first quarter results showing it sold 13% of Apple, its largest holding. During the Berkshire presentation I became increasingly concerned about the long-term outlook for US large-cap equities.

 

My worries were summarized in a column by Mohamed El-Erian for the Financial Times. He stated “tighter regulation, industrial policy, chronic fiscal looseness and internationally globalization has been giving way to fragmentation” as concerns.

 

Attending Berkshire’s annual shareholder meeting this weekend, I read a slide showing the major sources of the firm’s net operating income after taxes. One of the reasons to go to the meeting is that they report the results of the over 60 wholly owned and majority-owned companies in summary. In aggregate, their growth in earnings has slowed down or fallen. Most of these companies produce products and services used globally. Despite record domestic stock prices, it appears we are probably going to see an economic decline of measurable depth and magnitude. The questions that remain are timing and whether the decline is cyclical or structural. These questions forced me to examine the nature of these two remarkable companies presented this weekend.

 

Share Owners Create the Nature of Ownership

While management of the company largely dictates the nature of most companies, owners of the stock determine the nature of ownership of the stock. As both stocks are within ten percent of their all-time highs, there are very few losers in the stock. Both are multi product companies that provide services to both individuals and wholesale users. The companies have long outgrown their original set of products and services and their reputations allow premium positions within our society. While they have some competitors, they have no overall copycats. Their exact futures are not clear, although many users and owners have a great deal of faith in them, even though they don’t really know what their future will be. Without being sacrilegious, these two stocks have reached the point of being a religion in the secular world. Regardless of the existence of doubters and some heretics, it would take a major violation of the trust that has been established to destroy their faith in these two companies. (This has happened in the past, a couple of generations ago when the “Generals” were the secular religion, as in General Motors and General Electric, and many lesser Generals.)

 

Management Mistakes Admissions Help

Apple finally gave up on Project Titan (their car project). Elimination of their car project will allow Apple to conserve some needed talent. A complete car is a very different business and is not highly valued. Motorola lasted much longer, from its taxi and police car two-way radio in its early days to the semiconductor and early mobile phone years. On Saturday, Warren Buffet admitted he made the decision to sell Berkshire’s losing position in Paramount. While they were a supplier to Amazon, they didn’t buy the stock or another tech company until Apple.

 

Pulling the Thoughts Together Early

Revenue leverage in an inflationary period is unlikely to be maintained as a growth driver with small unit growth. Around the world, unit growth is decelerating. Productivity is also slowing because new hires are not as profitable as the seniors let go, even though juniors are initially paid less. However, lower pay expenses do not last long, as fringe benefits are more expensive, except for retirement. Retirees have not built-up enough savings to cover expenses in a non-work period. Productivity, where it exists, is driven by non-domestic born labor. Birth levels are below replacement needs and the education system is not producing ready, willing, and educated workers. AI gains, if delivered, will probably help the middle class but not the lower classes. The push for fewer working hours will create additional expenses and possibly social problems.

 

We need Berkshire Hathaway, Apple, and others to succeed for a healthy society around the world. Long-term it must be global, let’s hope it happens.       

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Avoiding Many Mistakes - Weekly Blog # 834

Mike Lipper's Blog: News & Reactions - Weekly Blog # 833

Mike Lipper's Blog: Better Investment Thinking - Weekly Blog # 832

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, February 26, 2023

“This was the Worst Week of the Year” - Weekly Blog # 773



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


This was the Worst Week of the Year”

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Wrong Perspective 

No investor likes to see a markdown of prices in their portfolio. However, these declines are likely less than the future reductions that lie ahead. We may be close to temporarily removing one of several overhanging dangers. The real risk to our long-term condition is the possibility of a short or shallow recession! 

 

For the pains sustained we have taken little in the way of corrective actions. We have largely maintained the same sets of problems we had prior to the recent price declines. 

 

Throughout our society we have a deep leadership vacuum in most activities, from small startups to our largest organizations of government, commercial, intellectual, health, and non-profits. Our problem is not that current leaders are fundamentally evil. Our problem is that in too many cases the present leaders rose to their top positions due to their political skills of getting along. They had to make compromises in the short-term, which had serious longer-term penalties. This is natural because we judge success by short-term achievements. 

 

What Have We Created? 

While there have always had inefficient organizations, we have too many of them today. These zombies exist throughout all cultures. If we adopt Sir Isaac Newton’s view of God as the watch maker who controls the universe wanting us to learn how to solve our own problems without His help. God must periodically intervene through abrupt changes in weather and the economy. These corrective measures are seen to be periodic recessions.  

 

Humans don’t always take advantage of the first clues and sometimes repeated strong medicine is necessary. The wake-up medicine comes in different strengths and duration. History suggests three generic types: 

  1. Recessions often caused by climate.
  2. Price recessions where critical supply shortages cause long periods of stagflation and cover up structural changes in the rules of the game. There is a good chance of missing major corrections for a relatively short period. We are swapping time for the beginning of an intense correction.
  3. The biggest percentage losers are those involved with companies labeled zombies. We should recognize that those hurt by zombie companies are not just the proprietors, but also those who have supplied equity and debt capital. Employees working for going concerns and communities housing the zombies could also be hurt. (Perhaps the time before the larger corrective recession hits could be used to reduce the large number of zombie companies.) 

 

Who Created the Zombies? 

The creators are not maligned leaders. They are just short-sighted in encouraging the zombies to grow and experience some prosperity. Normally, societies have constraints on growth to protect consumers and other capital providers. Periodically these constraints are relaxed or fail to be modernized to accommodate new conditions. The biggest relaxed constraint permitting large numbers of zombies to limp along is low interest rates. These companies do not have sufficient credit reserves and may not have been appropriately regulated by savvy regulators. 

 

Are You a Potential Zombie? 

Warren Buffett in his worthwhile annual letter to shareholders addressed the issue of pinpointing those that have insufficient credit. He suggests that those who I am calling zombies will be revealed as being naked when the tide goes out. 

 

While it is difficult to spot the soon to be naked players, it is not impossible. Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger have a remarkable record of avoiding problems. (Their few major loses are small in number and relative size. They follow the same strategy as the Kansas City Chiefs in the latest Super Bowl, as noted in our only non-weekly bulletin, which is about winning by avoiding losing. That is one of the main reasons we personally own shares of Berkshire Hathaway in other accounts.) 

 

The key characteristic of a zombie company is often a habit of admired=persistence. There is a critical difference between a zombie and a recovered hero. A zombie company persists in taking down its ship and all aboard who depend on their delivery. Those who recover stop digging their hole deeper. As investors we need to identify the critical player or players who have too much pride to abruptly return to shore before the next wave hits. History suggests that there is always an unexpected wave. 

 

Those who have made financial, political, and behavior mistakes, should look for self-help groups or a consultant that encourages them to periodically question their persistence. We should always contemplate the possibility of being wrong at some point in time.  

 

Subscribers, please share your successful review functions of questioning your actions.      

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.


Mike Lipper's Blog: A Terrible Week - Weekly Blog # 772


Mike Lipper's Blog: Primer on Starts of Cyclical & Stagflation - Weekly Blog # 771


Mike Lipper's Blog: Words that Trap: Growth, Value, Recession - Weekly Blog # 770

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, January 22, 2023

Confession: Numbers Don’t Tell All - Weekly Blog # 768

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Confession: Numbers Don’t Tell All


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

As a numbers-oriented person I must confess that numbers don’t reveal all critical information about a situation. For instance, future risks. The bearish financial press is focused on future profit margins shrinking on declining sales in the coming recession.

 

The real likely risk ahead of us is what an economic recession will mean to us personally. As Warren Buffet said, it will be revealed which swimmers are naked when the tide goes out. So too will we find out which companies are overextended when the economic pie shrinks.

 

The problem facing the management of companies, governments, non-profits, and individuals is the reduction of expenses. Rarely are expenses reduced proportionately to the actual decline in revenues, or the expected “top line”.  Expenses are cut either by judgement or happenstance. The cuts can impact the three “S” s on which future relationships are based. Products/services and future sales are based on their perceived Success in use, whereas Service is based on the ease of the relationship and the Safety of the user.

 

To an important degree the way customers feel about the product or service is dependent on the quality and quantity of known or unknown people they deal with at the firm and/or its distribution system.

 

The transaction price of most companies and practices are sold is leveraged over the resale value of its hard assets by its perceived reputation value. This is an attempt by the marketplace or ballot box to determine the sum total of the three “S” s. Thus, the impact on the absolute and relative value of its reputation is critical when it becomes necessary to cut people.

 

During the past holiday shopping season, it was easy to rank the service and inventory levels of various merchants through store visits. It was a little more difficult gauging the service levels provided by these service companies, particularly financial and health services. Much more difficult, but perhaps more important, is gauging the safety for the customer performed by service companies. Banks have announced employee cutbacks, hospitals are having difficulty finding qualified nurses and medical techs, certain military branches are understaffed in critical units, and law firms are reducing staff. These levels of safety should impact a company’s ultimate worth.

 

We don’t know what additional risks we are taking as consumers by relying on formerly reliable service providers whose staff support is shrinking. While I don’t know the risks, I do know that I am my accountant and back-office people are already spending more time reviewing the statements sent to us. I suspect the cost to me is much greater when a professional firm has an error or omission than when the wrong size of a garment is received at a store.

 

The following statistics suggest to me that I need to pay increasing attention to the details of safety than in the past:

 

Possible Warning Signs

  1. The decreasing value of the US dollar relative to other currencies. This will likely raise the cost or reduce the quantity of what I buy.
  2. There is a dichotomy between the level of transactions in the NYSE and the NASDAQ. Compared to a year ago, NYSE volume is down -14%, while NASDAQ volume is up +2%. Last week NYSE prices rose while NASDAQ prices fell. With many older company stocks generally flat for a year or more, the outlook for making money in these stocks looks limited. Some “growth stocks” are finding their sales more cyclical than in the past and the demographics are not promising.
  3. China’s business capital returns are declining. Growth in global trade has been heavily dependent on Chinese export earnings. If they become smaller as the rest of the world slows, it is likely that export earnings will decline and result in lower imports.

 

Self-Appointed Mission

Bernard Baruch, a friend of my grandfather, labeled himself a speculator at a congressional hearing. He then explained to members of the House that the term speculator comes from the Latin term “to see far”. I use a speculative focus on the future for me and my clients. Part of looking at the future is identifying different possibilities. I take my marching orders to spot both “bull” and “bear” cases.  

 

My blogs often warn of problems, as Mr. Baruch did. However, I think the time for a new “bull” market is coming. Hopefully, we will make enough adjustments to our society/economy so that we won’t need to go through stagflation to adjust.

 

I lack the ability to see the future. Hopefully, a few subscribers to these blogs will have some thoughts they are willing to share about the next major “bull” market. (Please don’t focus on inflation and interest rates which are old news, they are attributes, not causes.) Help!!

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: My Outlook: Nervous Balances - Weekly Blog # 767

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Next Election vs. Future Generations - Weekly Blog # 766

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bear Market, Recessions, Reinvestment - Weekly Blog # 765

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA


All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Two Questions: Length of Recession, Near-Term Strategy Choices - Weekly Blog # 600






Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Two Questions: Length of Recession, Near-Term Strategy Choices


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



Authors Note # 1 
This is our six hundredth blog. I hope you have gotten some worthwhile ideas to help with your investment responsibilities. My goal is to provide at least two ideas a year that make you think about your process, either differently or more thoroughly. As we are approaching our 12th year, I want to thank our subscribers who have shared their thoughts with me. These thoughts have helped me to reach our goals. I also want to thank my two editors who have been long term associates, the late Frank Harrison and his successor Hylton Phillips-Page. They have turned into English my too long Germanic sentences.

Length of Next Recession 
Any study of nature and economic history will show repeated periods of expansion (fat years) and contraction (lean years). In studying history, I believe they are not only inevitable, but required. It is important to separate economic contractions, which we call recessions, and market crashes. They are often in close proximity to one another, but not always. Economic recessions have a much greater impact on investment portfolios than so-called stock market crashes. For example, while much media focus continues to be on the October 1929 market crash, there is little mentioned that by December of that year the Dow Jones Industrial Average had risen back to its October levels. Thus, the crash was a technical dislocation and was not in itself a cause of the recession, or the psychological term that’s been applied, The Great Depression.

The historic reasons for contractions after periods of expansion, either in nature or economics, is an unsustainable expansion. There are many causes for unsustainable expansions:
  • Changes in climate
  • The outgrowth of war on both the victor and victim
  • Confusing secular growth with cyclical growth to meet a temporary demand vacuum
  • Too low or too high prices
  • Leaders of governments and/or businesses attempting to extend a tiring expansion
  • Loose credit that keeps both companies and individuals seemingly solvent, but creates zombies awaiting bankruptcy
  • Excess capacity creating excess supply, driving prices lower among competitors 
If recessions are inevitable, what is the question for investors? 
The question is the time span of the recession. Most modern recessions, as reflected by the stock market, have a duration of about 2 years (1-3 years). Considering the folly of those who have been correct in spotting a price peak and then have being wrong about the bottom and subsequent tops, I will not attempt to call an end to the current dance.

Considering my focus on long term investment accounts, it raises some questions. Does one stay with sound portfolio holdings enjoying the expansion, on the belief that their past gains will carry them through a roughly two-year decline. While not publicly admitting that this is their strategy, most individuals and institutional investors are currently following this strategy. There are however other issues that should be examined:
  • The current US stock market expansion is over ten years old.
  • Governments around the world are actively pushing nominal and inflation adjusted "real" rates down, creating zombies out of both corporations and individuals who should be exiting their debt. 
  • Not fully understanding that technology drives prices down, changing purchasing habits and creating deflationary trends which are often elements of a financial collapse. For example, there were those who believed we had seen peak auto production in the 1990s in Japan and in 2016 in the USA. These beliefs resulted from changing demographics, living habits, ride sharing, and the growth of US public transportation. Without a strong auto industry politics would change, as well as many other things. 
If our next recession lasts five or possibly ten years, shouldn't we be change our portfolios?
The problem with equity type risk in stocks, high yield bonds, and private equity/credit, is what to change it to? While mutual fund investors are not always right, it is interesting to note that the largest net flows are currently going into money market funds, followed by high quality commercial bonds.

As usual, Jason Zweig of The Wall Street Journal had some things to ponder. He reported that in 1929, on the basis of the radio boom, the Radio Corporation of America had a price/earnings ratio of 73 times and a price to book-value ratio of 16 times. Amazon, because of the promise of "the Cloud", recently had the same numbers if not higher.

Author's Note #II 
In the early 1960s I was a young analyst awaiting the boom in color television. After many years it finally happened, with RCA rising above its 1929 peak. The color television boom grew slowly because of the difficulty in producing acceptable quality television picture tubes. There were only a handful of suppliers and RCA was late in converting one of its factories in Pennsylvania to a color picture tube plant. Thus, I and many analysts visited the plant, followed by lunch with their management at the local country club.

The meeting date was November 23rd, 1963. It began and effectively ended with the announcement that President JFK had been shot and later died. Clearly, there were lots of unanswered questions at that time. One that struck me came from a well-know, but nameless analyst “what was happening to stocks on the American Stock Exchange?” This was significant because the largest manufacturer of color tubes was listed on the ASE. My guess is that he personally held that speculative stock with a large borrowed balance. The markets quickly closed to prevent a panic which would have wiped out many, including those on borrowed margin.

It was a very silent time on the train ride home from Pennsylvania that night, but it gave many of us a real understanding of the risks we were taking and how volatile markets can react to the unexpected. This kind of experience shapes one’s thinking for a lifetime. The US markets reopened the following Monday morning to reassure buyers.

Near-Term Strategy Choices 
In my role of selecting mutual funds for clients, I am always looking to balance the risks and rewards of investing. My associate Hylton and I do this is by reading financial documents and visiting many successful managers. This weekend I reviewed the strategies of a number of successful managers. I am happy to have a discussion with subscribers to see if any of these strategies fit within their responsibilities. The following list is not in preference order, but in the order of when I read their latest report:
  1. Import substitution (A bet on lessening globalization)
  2. Mid-Cap Opportunities (Not particularly unexploited)
  3. Better stock prices in China (Taking advantage of retail selling)
  4. Overweight financials (Contrarian bet on rising interest rates, which seems inevitable)
  5. Market share can be better than reported earnings if it is profitable and leads to higher EPS
  6. Cautious on momentum (already happening)
  7. Illiquidity is expected to get worse
  8. Investment decisions are based on current prices, not macro views. 
  9. Absence of bargains (Warren Buffett's complaint) 
Questions for the week: 
What portion of your portfolio could successfully survive a long recession?



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/10/things-are-seldom-what-they-seem-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/10/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/10/contrarian-bets-and-other-risks-weekly.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.