Showing posts with label Shortages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shortages. Show all posts

Sunday, October 25, 2026

Turning Point? - Weekly Blog # 964

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Turning Point?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

            

 

 

The Way We Think

Our musings are essentially focused on the development of our thinking regarding the future direction of equity investing. Hopefully, this gives an early glimpse of the future, with the end-product being advice on whether to buy or sell stocks. To accomplish this result as an equity analyst I look for clues in the uncertain worlds of commodities, economies and global politics, particularly when they appear to be out of balance.


Too Much Good and Bad

One age-old characteristic is the excess of one force pushing other elements out of normal balance. Shortages and excess productive overcapacity create imbalances that cause market prices to dramatically move over time. Usually, one looks for shortages that drive market prices. Today, I believe we should look at the impact of a factor that is distorting normal balances too much.

 

Debt is the most out of balance concern in the world, particularly in the US. There is a record peace-time deficit and increased public investment in private debt, which has historically been borrowed by governments, universities, charities, businesses, and families.

 

With so much debt, debtors are being forced to raise interest rates to compete for sources of funding, increasing the size of their debt service payments. While this is bad for society, it is not the worst problem. What is much worse is the quality of debt being offered to those who are increasingly less schooled in debt management. A factor likely to lead to sudden default and/or late payments. When these problems come home to roost lenders will be short of the cash needed to meet their own needs.

 

The Crux of the Debt Problem

The critical issue is the borrower’s words proving to be inaccurate, either through dishonesty or naiveite. The borrower’s naiveite is often accompanied by the lender’s naiveite. Shouldn’t the lender be more careful with a borrower who does not have a long history of repayment, or a borrower counting on cyclical cash flow patterns being higher than expected tax payments or debt repayments.

 

I am not suggesting borrowers are totally naïve or impractical. We are in the 8 days of a bitterly fought election campaign, and politicians and media pundits don’t have pristine records forecasting payments and repayments. Market participants are somewhat aware of the problem and are demanding higher interest rates. Are they at the right level?

 

Are There Other Problems?

Investor actions are sending out warning signals. For the last two weeks, many days have seen more shares sold on down prices than up. On Friday, the NASDAQ Composite Index, home of most of the “AI” players, has pierced the 2600 support level it had been hugging. This was anticipated by the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) with their declining outlook for the next six months.

 

These concerns are all classical market worries. However, there is a new concern that may be quite appropriate. The top economist for Apollo believes that “AI” has not deliver profits beyond the “AI” sector itself. (I wonder how reliable the forecasts of contracted customer revenue for new data centers will be. Will they produce sufficient profits to meet the cash flow needs of the centers and their customers?)

 

Now is the Time to Think About Market Gains

Market declines create opportunities, in some cases large ones. (Warning, Berkshire Hathaway is the largest stock in many of our client and personal portfolios. Consequently, you should be cautious in believing this forward-looking analysis, which could be wrong or take too long.)

 

Warren Buffett and Charley Munger assembled the largest collection of private and publicly traded companies. For the most part they picked well, but some of their investments were mediocre or worse. With new CEO Greg Able, the firm is gradually changing. He noted that some of their independent investments can profitably establish mutually beneficial links. To aid in these efforts he has installed a few executives to build alliances in anticipation of mammoth-sized payoffs in the future.

 

I see Berkshire undertaking a major housing effort that will build a series of differently priced housing communities supported by their own mortgage companies and a large real estate broker. The company will own one of the largest public utility groups, which can utilize nuclear power. Their railroad will benefit from efficient distribution of increased exports and imports. Foreign investments will grow and will be a good hedge against the value of the dollar. Finally, their stock portfolio is likely to benefit from their new investments and their companies in the financial sector, which looks like a sector that will undergo lots of change in the coming years.

 

As usual I appeal to our subscribers to teach me where I am wrong, I am willing to learn.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Penalty for Using the Wrong Indicators - Weekly Blog # 963

Mike Lipper's Blog: Headlines Are for Those Who Don’t Use Their Heads - Weekly Blog # 962

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Changes Indicative? - Weekly Blog # 961

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

Sunday, October 30, 2022

Rarely Found Different Thoughts - Blog # 757

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Rarely Found Different Thoughts


 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

            

 

 

Unexamined thoughts can contain time-bombs antithetical to generally accepted views. Good professional scouts (analysts/portfolio managers) should review as many unexamined thoughts as possible to find comfort in their present views, or look for possible reasons to change them.

The closer you focus on media designed for mass audiences the smaller the focus on detail. This results in more emotional and decisive views. The conclusions might end up being correct, but the historical odds of being right are substantially below half.

A good example is the reported percentage gain from the June lows for the 3 popular stock market averages. Most of the media, with their limited space and time, tend to focus on the results of the 30 stock Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). You get a distinct happy view that this senior index is up +14.40% from its low point, which is in the mid-range for rallies after a sizable decline.

A much larger sample found in the S&P 500 index, weighted not by price but by market capitalization, has gained +9.05%. This is a more normal sized bounce, not the large gain seen in the DJIA. Considering this index is experiencing a period of increased volatility and is only up 353.44 points, it seems more like a rally in a traditional “bear market”.

Tech-oriented stocks led global markets both in the last expansion and during the most recent decline. There were some notable near-term declines in earnings and or future guidance, yet their prices increased +6.58% as measured by the NASDAQ Composite. The sectors that go down most in a short-term market rally often lead on the upside too. No so now!!

The problem facing the world in terms of chatter by politicians and pundits is inflation. People don’t understand that inflation is a price adjustment mechanism to equate the value of goods and services to the currency at hand. Inflation is a measure, not the cause. It is created by perceived shortages, not excess demand. The shortages are partially caused by the declining productivity of human and financial capital.

The collective failure to address these causes suggests one should take a bearish attitude in anticipation of a probable recession. The real fear is that without addressing the real problems we will experience future deeper recessions, stagnation, or worse for capital owners, stagflation.

How do you see it?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Current and Future Views are Confusing - Weekly blog # 756

Mike Lipper's Blog: Fundamental Changes Occurring - Weekly Blog # 755

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are We There Yet - Weekly Blog # 754

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 - 2022

 

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, December 19, 2021

Questions Without Answers Indicate Uncertainty - Weekly Blog # 712

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Questions Without Answers Indicate Uncertainty


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



Searching for Direction

Investors gain confidence when they have a clear sense of direction, particularly regarding short-term market moves. They ask a lot of questions in the hope of finding concrete answers. This is increasingly true as markets move closer to the top of a major phase. Thus, extreme confidence, while generally reassuring, is a warning sign of a nearby top. 

Each week I examine lots of data and articles in the media looking for concrete answers, or at least a guide as to direction. This week I came up with some interesting questions, without any good answers. As many subscribers are professional or insightful individual investors, I will serve up the questions with elements of my indecisive views. I am hopeful some will provide answers as a Christmas present and communicate them to me, either for my personal use or to share.


Are Smarter Investors Calling a Turn?

For some time, I have suggested large investors in the NASDAQ stock market are on average brighter than those invested exclusively or mostly on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). This is based on the performance of various small-company mutual fund portfolios trading on the NASDAQ since the March 23, 2020 trough. On average this has been the best performing group based on market capitalization (The other groups are large-caps, multi-caps, and mid-caps.) However, year-to-date smaller caps are running in fourth place. There was possibly a change on Friday with its high volume? The NYSE volume was 5 million shares, split roughly 2 million on the upside and 3 million on the downside. On the NASDAQ, total volume was close to 8 million shares, split 4.6 million shares on the upside and 3.2 million on the downside. The NASDAQ Composite has declined 5.53% from its 2021 peak, the most of the three popular indices and roughly halfway through a classic 10% correction.

Does Friday's market action suggest savvy players picking up bargains at low prices?


Commodity Funds Rising Earlier than Expected

Numerous individual commodities are rising due to shortages. The median commodity fund is up +28.79%, while the weighted average fund is only up +3.92%. The reason for this difference is the extreme performance of Energy funds +71.98% and Precious Metals funds -10.41%. Commodity price cycles typically extend to one or more decades, for example from 1996 to 2016. Professional commodity investors did not expect a general commodity rise for at least another five years, after several new mines became operational. The switch to electric vehicles from internal combustion engine vehicles has accelerated demand for some metals, while the interest in currency coins has simultaneously impacted the demand for numerous commodities.

Are these speculative trends going to continue and cause actual mine and mill openings to accelerate? 


Investors Are Finding Other Markets Attractive 

While the US equity market has gained about 25% year-to-date, three other markets are also up over 20%:  India +22.3%, Taiwan +22.0%, and Canada +21.5%. Many investors now see international diversification as prudent, with political turmoil making US investing difficult for at least the next three years. As the economy recovers from various pandemics and tax/trade uncertainties, declining percentage gains in rising earnings will hurt. 


The Fed is Not Helping 

The Fed is basically defining its role as affirming the current situation by looking forward from its present position.


Critical Question: Do you think you will change your investment strategy materially before the next top?




Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/12/two-contrarian-questions-next-recession.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/12/selections-weekly-blog-710.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/11/investors-be-alert-to-novembers-risk.html Mike Lipper's Blog: 




Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.