Showing posts with label Over capacity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Over capacity. Show all posts

Sunday, October 25, 2026

Turning Point? - Weekly Blog # 964

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Turning Point?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

            

 

 

The Way We Think

Our musings are essentially focused on the development of our thinking regarding the future direction of equity investing. Hopefully, this gives an early glimpse of the future, with the end-product being advice on whether to buy or sell stocks. To accomplish this result as an equity analyst I look for clues in the uncertain worlds of commodities, economies and global politics, particularly when they appear to be out of balance.


Too Much Good and Bad

One age-old characteristic is the excess of one force pushing other elements out of normal balance. Shortages and excess productive overcapacity create imbalances that cause market prices to dramatically move over time. Usually, one looks for shortages that drive market prices. Today, I believe we should look at the impact of a factor that is distorting normal balances too much.

 

Debt is the most out of balance concern in the world, particularly in the US. There is a record peace-time deficit and increased public investment in private debt, which has historically been borrowed by governments, universities, charities, businesses, and families.

 

With so much debt, debtors are being forced to raise interest rates to compete for sources of funding, increasing the size of their debt service payments. While this is bad for society, it is not the worst problem. What is much worse is the quality of debt being offered to those who are increasingly less schooled in debt management. A factor likely to lead to sudden default and/or late payments. When these problems come home to roost lenders will be short of the cash needed to meet their own needs.

 

The Crux of the Debt Problem

The critical issue is the borrower’s words proving to be inaccurate, either through dishonesty or naiveite. The borrower’s naiveite is often accompanied by the lender’s naiveite. Shouldn’t the lender be more careful with a borrower who does not have a long history of repayment, or a borrower counting on cyclical cash flow patterns being higher than expected tax payments or debt repayments.

 

I am not suggesting borrowers are totally naïve or impractical. We are in the 8 days of a bitterly fought election campaign, and politicians and media pundits don’t have pristine records forecasting payments and repayments. Market participants are somewhat aware of the problem and are demanding higher interest rates. Are they at the right level?

 

Are There Other Problems?

Investor actions are sending out warning signals. For the last two weeks, many days have seen more shares sold on down prices than up. On Friday, the NASDAQ Composite Index, home of most of the “AI” players, has pierced the 2600 support level it had been hugging. This was anticipated by the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) with their declining outlook for the next six months.

 

These concerns are all classical market worries. However, there is a new concern that may be quite appropriate. The top economist for Apollo believes that “AI” has not deliver profits beyond the “AI” sector itself. (I wonder how reliable the forecasts of contracted customer revenue for new data centers will be. Will they produce sufficient profits to meet the cash flow needs of the centers and their customers?)

 

Now is the Time to Think About Market Gains

Market declines create opportunities, in some cases large ones. (Warning, Berkshire Hathaway is the largest stock in many of our client and personal portfolios. Consequently, you should be cautious in believing this forward-looking analysis, which could be wrong or take too long.)

 

Warren Buffett and Charley Munger assembled the largest collection of private and publicly traded companies. For the most part they picked well, but some of their investments were mediocre or worse. With new CEO Greg Able, the firm is gradually changing. He noted that some of their independent investments can profitably establish mutually beneficial links. To aid in these efforts he has installed a few executives to build alliances in anticipation of mammoth-sized payoffs in the future.

 

I see Berkshire undertaking a major housing effort that will build a series of differently priced housing communities supported by their own mortgage companies and a large real estate broker. The company will own one of the largest public utility groups, which can utilize nuclear power. Their railroad will benefit from efficient distribution of increased exports and imports. Foreign investments will grow and will be a good hedge against the value of the dollar. Finally, their stock portfolio is likely to benefit from their new investments and their companies in the financial sector, which looks like a sector that will undergo lots of change in the coming years.

 

As usual I appeal to our subscribers to teach me where I am wrong, I am willing to learn.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Penalty for Using the Wrong Indicators - Weekly Blog # 963

Mike Lipper's Blog: Headlines Are for Those Who Don’t Use Their Heads - Weekly Blog # 962

Mike Lipper's Blog: Are Changes Indicative? - Weekly Blog # 961

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.