Investors Be Alert to November’s Risk Lessons - Weekly Blog # 709

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Investors Be Alert to November’s Risk Lessons

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

In the US we have just celebrated Thanksgiving. Other countries also have typical harvest festivals where they are publicly thankful for personal good harvests. As a perpetual student of investing, I am thankful for the investment mistakes I and others have made, for they represent learning opportunities. We have an opportunity to not repeat mistakes by learning from them. Both George Washington in the American Revolution and Abraham Lincoln in the Civil War started off by losing battles. They came close to losing their wars, but learned well and changed their tactics/strategies. 

In my discussions with successful investors, I usually probe their mistakes, asking what they learned from them. They often mention that there was a factor in clear view that they did not fully appreciate. In general, these factors were not standard securities analysis issues, but some critical element that would have significantly changed the valuation of a security or market.

The month of November could be such a period where changes unfold that make a major difference. In most developed countries with active securities markets stocks sold at near or above normal valuations, with high-quality bonds selling at depressed prices. In most countries COVID-19 was highlighted as the major cause of supply chain shortages leading to rising rates of inflation, although they were usually the result of economies being stimulated with wide-spread grants. These excesses were tolerated, but they made owners of capital nervous. 

Political leaders recognized the best way to win the next election was to continue contributing to inflation, providing more money than the amount of goods and services available. In the US, the latest census will shift seats from urban centers to southern states in the 2022 election. Texas will get two additional house seats and Florida one. Both have strong Republican governors and legislatures, which probably means these three new seats will go to Republicans, with Democrats losing three seats at a minimum. Historically, the party that wins the prior Presidential election loses the next mid-term election in Congress, particularly in “The House”. Based on history, it is logical to expect Republicans to gain enough House seats to prevent the continuation of Democrat spending and taxation policies.

During early November it was rumored within political circles that President Biden wanted a second term, even while his approval rating was simultaneously dropping. At the same time anti-energy moves were pushed by the Administration, most impacting Texas the leading petroleum producing state. The attack on the energy industry continued this week with the tapping the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and the raising of the royalty rate for drilling on government land. (The Strategic Reserve was set up so the military would have a source of energy should foreign countries prohibit sales to the US). It is a bit ironic for this President to make these moves while seeing himself as FDR like. FDR prohibited US oil companies from selling their oil from Indonesia to Japan, giving Japan a reason to expand its drive further South in the Pacific.

In the second week in November portions of the US and European markets topped out, while China’s market was already in decline. This week a new COVID variant, Omnicron (B.1.1.529), from Africa emerged. It is growing very fast and has caused the suspension of an increasing number of international flights. While some may feel this is just bad luck (racing luck), the medical profession has expected new variants for some time.   

On Friday most of the World’s stock markets fell materially. In the US the popular stock indices declined between 2% and 3%. Some sectors were worse, with Health/Biotech falling 4%. A number of individual stocks also declined materially, with at least one falling by 20%. 

Does the abbreviated US stock market session on Friday give us a clue as to its future movement? Possibly, both the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ traded 3.4 million shares on Friday. Ninety percent of the NYSE volume was in declining prices, with only 71% for the NASDAQ. However, the number of new lows on the NYSE was 9.5% vs. 17.2% for the NASDAQ. This suggests to me that further declines are needed for the NYSE to bring stock investors back into the market. It is possible buyers were purchasing options instead of stock and if that happens broker/dealers may buy additional underlying shares.

At this point I do not see anything that would turn sentiment for trading in the week ahead positive. Only skilled traders should try to ride the various bounces that could occur. Initially, US investors will likely follow the path of Asian and European investors, which appear to be muted. Patience may be rewarded.

Please share your perspectives privately or for attribution.

What do you think?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/11/best-bet-more-sweaters-and-parkas-vs.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/11/lessons-from-london-mistakes-repeated.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/11/do-you-believe-congratulations-are-in.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

What Is The Problem? - Weekly Blog # 702

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

What Is The Problem?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Where are we?

As we enter the third quarter, often a good performing quarter, US stock market volume is underwhelming. Apparently, declining confidence in global political leadership has led to a fall in investor confidence. In the latest week, each of the six best performing funds had a different investment objective. In fund performance order they are: Managed Futures, Flexible, Tech, Financial Services, Natural Resources, and Precious Metals. This suggests no common theme or the likelihood of similar stock positions. Thus, success is likely the result of critical skill in stock selection, not sector or market selection. A similar focus is seen in fixed income, where corporates are outperforming governments.

The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey of members is showing no enthusiasm for either a bullish or bearish future for markets. This survey is often a reliable contrary indicator for the next six month’s performance. Of all the indicators reviewed, the only one that’s relatively strong is the Barron’s Confidence Index, which favors stocks over bonds.

In general, I believe actions speak louder than words, particularly from members of the investment/financial community. This week I am seeing an increasing number of respected firms uprooting their employees and moving to Texas or Florida, not just for lower state taxes but for a better lifestyle. In addition, within the fixed income world there has been a considerable shift of investment people from one well known large employer to another. I am also noticing various product lines being transferred from one insurance company to another in the insurance sector. There are undoubtedly specific reasons for each of these shifts, but underlying each shift there appears to be a view that the future will be better for employees and their clients at their new firm. 

Should we be looking at longer periods and seeking different clues? There are brief lessons from Rome, Netherlands (vs Spain), England, and the USA. If we apply these and other lessons, we can handle our competition with China long-term.

Rome

For hundreds of years Rome was the dominant power in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East. It was the technological leader of the world based on its mastery of building roads for military chariots and commerce. Rome was also the builder of aqueducts bringing water to Mediterranean cities. 

Rome was brought down by its own invention of “Bread and Circuses”. The political powers in Rome provided bread and free entertainment to its supporters in their arenas (circuses). In effect these were bribes. These “gifts” to the population of Rome, the tributes from conquered lands, allowed many Romans to not work. The history of great empires like Rome is that they fell due to internal pressures and the unwillingness to properly defend themselves. Thus, the great Roman Empire was defeated by bribes that weakened their will to survive.

Netherlands

The country fought a series of wars to free itself from the threat of occupation by the much larger and richer Spain. It was essentially a war between Spain, with its import of Latin American gold wealth, and the aggressive Dutch merchants who worked together. (One of the classic paintings of this era shows a group of merchants serving as night watchmen to alert their community to the danger of fire in their midst.) These merchants were inventive, creating the first stock exchange. They were also early in developing funding vehicles such as trading companies servicing their established colonies in South America, Asia, and Africa. Robeco also successfully built the first self-managed and owned mutual fund, way before the late Jack Bogle’s Vanguard. 

When I was a junior security analyst at Burnham, there was great respect paid to the firm’s Dutch clients who were believed to be very savvy judging risk. (I remember commenting on one occasion that the Dutch were selling shares in a Dutch international company to the Americans. It seemed to me that the locals were right, and they proved to be.) 

From a small geographic base and only a merchant fleet, they established a number of large international companies and colonies, without the benefit of a strong military. This proves that under the right circumstances merchant power and expertise is equal to or better than a strong military base. Even today, Dutch financial companies “punch” way above their geographic weight.

England

England, or more precisely the United Kingdom, is another former global empire from a small country with limited natural resources. Like the Dutch, they were early in building a savings industry, which is now a world financial power. The country has also produced more legal principles than any other in the world. While The Magna Carta was only between the King and Nobles, it proved to be the foundation of the concept of limited government. 

The English did something few countries have done, passing the crown three times to leaders born outside the country, and it worked well. The political establishment has also yielded to a popular view other than the sitting government. (While we celebrate the US victory at Yorktown as the end of the American Revolutionary War, a peace treaty was signed in London before the battle even began. Without electronic communication, America had to wait for a ship to arrive with the news.) The change in London was led by prime minister William Pitt, the Younger, who deemed the war too expensive relative to the value of US trade. The long war was difficult to win, so the finest military and navy conceded. Only great leadership of a country has the strength to recognize changes have taken place that require a change in policy.

USA and Prohibition

Almost as soon as elections were held in the cities of this country, it was common for some political groups to offer alcoholic drinks to would be voters. A small-scale throwback to the “bread and circuses” of Rome, but still a type of bribe. When the temperance movement gathered steam I suspect it received some support from those who felt gifted alcohol on election day may have changed some votes, particularly in big cities with lots of new voters. 

Much like with William Pitt, the Younger, popular opinion turned against prohibition when policies needed to be changed in the 1930s. It probably cemented the “wet” politician relationship with bootleggers, speakeasy proprietors, their suppliers and customers. Even after Prohibition, the only places in New York state to get a drink on election and primary days were locations independent of New York law, the Indian reservations and the dining room at the United Nations. This demonstrates the US can change policies when the perceived facts change.

China

I believe the current leadership in China is largely consistent with its history, demographics, and its financial structure. Approximately 90% of the people living in China today are descendants of the Han Chinese, the remaining 10% comprised of approximately 55 other national groups. While many of these groups have lived peacefully in China for hundreds if not thousands of years, they are viewed as potentially disruptive by the central government. Based on these concerns I believe the government does not want to add new nationalities into China. Because the Nationalist government fled China, they view Taiwan as largely Han Chinese. If I am close to correct, I do not believe Xi wants to occupy other countries. However, it is afraid of being trapped by unfriendly neighbors. That is why they want them to be friendly and not be controlled by other world powers.

Xi has other problems, including incipient competition funded by some successful businesspeople. He is very conscious he’s in a race against time, with the population aging and not replenishing itself.  The Chinese are prodigious savers who’ve had little to spend their money on and a heritage of living rurally with weather/crop cycles. Within family groups and some small communities there is a combination lottery lending mechanism, allowing the winners to jump to a higher economic level. In aggregate Chinese savings are enormous, funding both business and various levels of government.

The best way for the US to become more competitive with China is in some respects to copy them. Currently, our political leaders measure our success by the amount we are spending on goods and services. Although this provides current value, some consumption has no value long-term, causing this country to fall further behind as a saving society. The US government should switch its emphasis to saving for the future, where we are very much underfunding retirement. Additional savings would push up savings income and attract Chinese investors anxious to diversify their investments.  They are all conscious of the risks in their own over leveraged society. 

If we are able to do this, we would accomplish what my wife describes as a double win, benefiting both the Chinese and the Western investor. Such an occurrence would generate a lot of confidence.

Why Now?

While many people talk longer-term, most of their psychic and financial income is relatively short-term, impacted by their own expected tax rates. The future is almost never crystal clear and for many it has become either less clear, less attractive, or both.

Near-term elections over the next three years may provide some answers, or they may not. It will depend on leadership characteristics changing from the standard politician’s focus on the next election and those of statesmen or women focusing on future generations.  

   

What do you think?    

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/10/the-confidence-game-weekly-blog-701.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/09/two-confessions-weekly-blog-700.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/09/observations-prior-to-excitement-weekly.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.