Showing posts with label Treasury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Treasury. Show all posts

Sunday, February 6, 2022

Changing Focus in a Changing World - Weekly Blog # 719

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Changing Focus in a Changing World


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




Changing Focus

Securities analysts should come with two perspectives. The majority attempt to read the current minutiae of what companies are saying, with the goal of assessing the current price and the probability of relatively short-term future prices. The second perspective, rarely produced for public or client consumption, eventually pays bigger rewards when correct. 

For some time, this blog has highlighted the relatively unreported negatives concerning the current optimistic outlook. Entering 2022, there are more comments about risks and possible recessions, which while still in the minority of published opinion, has increased in coverage. At this point there are enough bearish comments, so I can move on to the much tougher challenge of finding reasons to be optimistic. The eventual major stock and bond market decline is inevitable, although I cannot identify the time and headlines that will label the decline. Furthermore, I cannot stipulate the length of the bear market, which is normally a function of what owners do, not what issuers do. In other words, from the current lofty levels I am beginning to look across the valley of disappointment to the beginnings of the next expansion. 

I look forward to learning the views of subscribers, both concerning the down phase and the recovery.


Changing Environment 

The future will contain a multitude of changes, many small, but a few unexpected by most will verge on being seismic. At some point in many developed countries, the growing size of government debt owed to non-citizens will be too large. Not only will foreigners refuse to buy more, but they are also likely to push for debt repayment, not rollovers. 

For many Central banks and commercial financial institutions, US debt is a prized asset. However, Mae West may finally be wrong in that “too much of a good thing is wonderful”. In 1990 the Federal Debt totaled $3 Trillion, now in under half of a lifetime it is $30 trillion. Politicians of both parties are responsible for this growth in our children’s and grandchildren’s debt. Interestingly, 35 of 50 states require balanced state budgets. (One can examine the financial health of the 15 states that don’t have this restriction, comparing local crime and inflation.)  While the growing debt is deplorable, it is probably a good indicator of how the government meets its other responsibilities. (Some houses never have a single broken window.)

Looking at the implication of the growing debt and its likely impact on the investment environment in 30 years. The debt will impact our children’s assets and the future value of what our grandchildren inherit. It would be prudent to expect taxes of all sorts to increase. Increased taxes will lower the reported earnings of companies and will probably delay the dividend increases the third generation may be living on. Will it likely lead to lower price/earnings ratios? (Since the 1950s we have generally benefited from rising earnings multiples.)

There are at least two other changes to our investment environment, both positive if one’s portfolio is properly positioned. The first is that winning companies and institutions, no matter what they do, will make progress by improving customer service. Because technology will likely continue to lower the costs to manufacture and transport, the winners will have the attitude of successful service companies.

We are already seeing the third trend that is going global. Year-to-date figures show the US market declining more than 5%, while Brazil is up +10%, Greece +8.5%, South Africa +6%, and Chile +6%. Five other countries have positive equity markets. We are also seeing positive fund flows into Western Europe, Japan, and Emerging Markets. This is probably not a short-term phenomenon. While one can understand a certain reluctance to disclose critical information in patent applications, the number of patents granted suggests a large amount of technology innovation is taking place outside the US. The percentages of patents awarded in 2021 was: China 49, Japan 15, South Korea 11, US 10, and Europe 8.


Changing Companies

Many companies continually evolve, some more dramatically than others. As my primary focus is financial companies, I see some making changes that should impact earnings patterns in the future. Goldman Sachs (*) is developing a retail banking base to fund their investment banking activities. It is my speculation that when Buffett and Munger are no longer involved with Berkshire Hathaway (*), shareholders will own more than one stock certificate. Over time it is reasonable to assume a number of their activities could generate higher stock prices if separated. I also suspect that if the Fed, FDIC, and Treasury come under more restrictive management, a number of banks will split their activities requiring a bank license, placing the more profitable businesses in another company. Watch JP Morgan Chase (*) for such a move within ten years. The financial sector may initiate dramatic changes in how they manage their human relations and work from home activities.

(*) Owned in managed accounts or personal accounts.


Changing Investors

The current effort of some governments to regulate an increasing amount of corporate activity through regulatory bodies will drive more investment into private companies. There is already some level of private market transactions, which will increase. NASDAQ (*) has been active in this, as have a number of brokerage firms and banks. This drive may well lead to more cross border transactions. In dealing with private companies, valuations are often based on verifiable sales data, which includes a price/sales comparison. There is a lot of room for such transactions. For example, the P/S ratio for the Russell 1000 Growth is 5.12X, with the MSCI World ex US Small Cap being 1.05X. 

In terms of investment sophistication, there are private investors capable of protecting themselves as smaller institutional investors. There are times where not being public is better for both the company and its investors. In many cases these investors have entered a second career as a supervisor or confidant to multi-generational family assets.


Question: In your thinking about the future, what changes are you expecting and how will you handle them?

  



Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/things-are-seldom-what-they-seem-weekly.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/two-critical-questions-weekly-blog-717.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/current-causes-of-concern-weekly-blog.html




Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2020


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.


Sunday, May 9, 2021

Where is the Stock Market Going Next? - Weekly Blog # 680

 



Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Where is the Stock Market Going Next?


Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –



                          

The job of the analyst is to consider alternatives, which enables the owners of capital to make decisions concerning their separate needs and time frames. As an analyst, it is not our job to pass judgment on the proper path forward. Our task is to guess the most likely direction in terms of the most favorable risk/reward ratio. 

Combining my trained instinct as a US Marine Officer and a thoroughbred amateur racetrack handicapper, I look for better than average risk/return opportunities by avoiding massed crowds. I do this by observing what I see around me and putting together a portfolio of reasonably low risk of loss with an acceptable reward. I see market sensitivities through the following lenses: 

Stock Markets Moving in Opposite Directions 
In the latest week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) rose +2.67% and the S&P 500 +1.23%. The NASDAQ fell for a second week by-1.51%. The percentage of the stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) hit a new high of 26% vs. 11% for the NASDAQ. According to the Dow Jones Standard & Poor’s indices, the best performing stocks were US Select Dividend stocks +3.48%. Internet Services stocks –5.3% were the worst.  Perhaps the best encapsulation of this lack of confidence was the stock price movement of T. Rowe Price (*), which reached a high of $189.42 on Friday vs its low of $179.29 on Monday. The other four days of the week produced higher volumes than Friday, which declined 40% from its peak volume on Tuesday. 
 
(*) Held in private financial services fund and personal accounts.

Mutual Funds Capture the Views of Both Individual and Institutional Investors 
For the latest 52 weeks, the average US Diversified Equity Fund (USDE) gained +60.1%, with the average S&P 500 index fund being up +47.59%. Just seeing those results suggest caution in anticipating large gains for the next 52 weeks. In the current week, the average USDE was down -1.06%, while the average Commodity fund was up +3.01%. Clearly a different assessment of the impact of rising inflation on the general stock market. 

Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Studied Views
Their non-partisan view is that by the middle of the following decade (2030s), the size of interest payments will be larger than current deficits. Paying interest on interest is not a sound financial plan. The Congressional Budget Office is also on record saying private economic forecasters have a bad record. This was before Friday’s miss on the expected surge in jobs. 

Eyeball Observations 
We visited The Mall at Short Hills on the Saturday before the US celebration of Mothers’ Day. My niece noted that there were only a few less empty store locations than about a month ago. Nevertheless, the crowd approached a Christmas season level, with one major difference, shoppers were not carrying a lot of labelled shopping bags. They must have been purchasing smaller items. I suspect they were spending their government “Roman circus” or “bribes” from the stimulus payments before prices rose further. While not many looked at Saturday’s Wall Street Journal (WSJ), those who did could see that 85% of the weekly prices shown were rising. 

The Political Game 
The only “blood sport” played in Washington DC is for the next election.  For a some aging politicians, the 2022 congressional elections leading up to the 2024 Presidential election will be their “Last Hurrah”. There are some that see George Orwell’s classic “1984” introduction of “Newspeak”, its purpose was to hide intent. For example, “War is Peace” or “Ignorance is Strength”. Today they might use “Fair Share of Taxes” for capital redistribution. 

The Federal Reserve
For those who still believe the Federal Reserve determines short-term interest rates, it is wise to understand the political position of the so-called independent governors of the Fed. The Fed is probably the only central bank that directly answers to the nation’s political power. In our case the President appoints the governors but has difficulty exercising control. Except, votes were unanimous when both the Yellen and Powell boards raised interest rates. (Various Presidents and members of Congress have tried to reduce the theoretical “independence” of the Fed.) 

In the “tug of war” between the Fed and elected politicians, the key signposts are interest rates. Low interest rates are favored by borrowers, including by a few past Presidents. Savers want interest rates high enough to cover both inflation and the incipient cost of defaults. The political problem facing politicians is that financial markets recognize government interest rates do not compensate for future inflation. Consequently, private sector rates have adjusted upward and the foreign exchange value of the US dollar has declined against a few of the available alternatives. Under an activist government at the Treasury, the SEC and CFTC can expect regulatory attacks to force a closing of the gap between government and private market interest rates. This battle is likely to lead to troubled markets.

Currently, with lots of enthusiasm in the markets, please be careful with your investments. The winning odds are coming down and reducing the risk/reward ratio, probably for a year.  

What do you think?



Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/05/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/04/four-letter-words-to-sounder-investing.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-other-side-weekly-blog-677.html



Did someone forward you this blog? 
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.