Building Your Future Winning Portfolio - Weekly Blog # 724

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Building Your Future Winning Portfolio

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Personality Shapes Portfolio Architecture 

One hurdle we give little thought is the modern mass production of clothes, foods, jobs, schools, and financial instruments (portfolios). Staunton Military Academy and the US Marine Corps were contributors to what I am today, but like everyone else I want to be unique. In that search to find myself, both my wife and I have turned to history to learn how others developed their identities. 

Focusing on how others have navigated their successes and failures, I am particularly interested in learning how to minimize losses. Large failures are typical of those who have achieved measurable success. Psychologists who measure the impact of winning and losing believe we feel at least twice as bad from losing. (I believe some of us feel even worse about losses. Losses delay our commitments to successful actions and use up some of our precious time.) People experience both successes and failures and some learn from their defeats, using that knowledge to build subsequent victories. For example, both George Washington and Abraham Lincoln suffered multiple losses before their victories. 

We Alone Are the Senior Architect of Our Investments 

While we may consult with various professionals, family, and friends, we are ultimately responsible for creating our investment portfolio and our lives. I have prepared an a la carte menu for you to choose from that is specific to meeting your investment personality needs. Instead of each alternative having prices or calories as a guide, I list a very rough risk/return identifier. (Through your own experience you can modify my judgements.) 

A la Carte Menu of Portfolio Vehicles 

Type             Risk Orientation

All on a single bet      Favored by entrepreneurs (Henry Ford 

                         was twice bankrupt before success) 

Concentrated holdings    Limited number of large bets with 

                         common risk characteristics 

 

Actively managed fund    Account/fund of less than 50 names 

Passive Index Fund       Fully invested + low turnover 

Combined Approaches      Risk avoidance limits upside 

Personally, I plead guilty to the last choice. Our big positions are centered on domestic and international financial services companies and funds. I use actively managed funds and fund management companies when I do not have confidence in particular companies, but believe their focus is correct. In doing so I use a fund or fund like vehicle as a common denominator play. 

Types of Declines and Expected Influence Structures 

The US stock market has been in decline for some time. In some respect you could go back to 2019 or earlier. The expansion of the NASDAQ Composite since the financial crisis may have ended in November 2021. Using that as a measure we have entered a bear market for at least two days, but it is not yet convincing. Both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 have entered a correction phase, falling more than 10%. (The media called both the bear market and correction phase but cannot tie it to an economic or market measure.) Nevertheless, this may be a good time to assess the types of market declines and appropriate tactics and strategies: 

Correction Phase - According to S&P, the market is up +9% one year later. 

Bear Market - One year later the market is up +13%. (To the extent that the market indices represent one’s holdings and the account is eventually taxable, it doesn’t make sense to liquidate unless there is a specific problem that questions the future of the company. Most, but not all recessions lead to bear markets, so it is not a specific call for portfolio action. 

The real risk is an activist top-down government taking a normal cyclical decline and turning it into an active depression lasting a couple of years or more. If this is expected, the proper strategy is to cut expenditures as much as possible and shrink the portfolio in terms of capital commitment, but not names. In The Wall Street Journal, Jason Zweig recounts the incidence of Sir John Templeton buying 104 stocks trading for under $1.00, including 34 that were in bankruptcy. This was in 1939 before the US entered WWII. After the war he made a profit on 100 of the positions. (I do not expect a similar experience for the country, the market, or an investor, but the lesson shows the value of long-term investing, staring with low prices on the NYSE.) 

Which is Best Now? 

History does not offer a direct parallel. The closest that I have seen is the 6 months prior to the declaration of WWI. The immediate causes were the weak, isolationist, attitudes of the US government, plus the assignation of the Archduke, which was part of the unrest in Eastern Europe. Our fear is China supplying military goods to Russia as requested. This conceivably could bring a third world war.  

In deciding what to do, I suggest putting both the stock tables and the annual reports down. Evaluate your holdings as companies. Would you like to own all the company and never sell it? Warren Buffett views companies based on whether your children would be buyers of their products or services. 

After many successful years of investment, you may have an oversized highly profitable position and may have large loss positions to “harvest”, if you don’t think they will recover. These losses could be used to bring balance to your portfolio by recognizing the losses and simultaneously reducing some of the overweight positions in your winners. The freeing up of cash from both losers and slightly reduced winners creates a fund for reinvestment at a time when prices are reduced. 

Final thoughts: Understanding that making a series of correct investment turning point decisions is very rare, allow yourself to make mistakes, learn from them, and generally stay the course.

  

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/03/does-decline-influence-recovery-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/02/successful-investing-expects-unexpected.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/02/we-are-progressing-weekly-blog-721.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Anticipating Topping US Stock Market for Portfolio Managers vs. Stock Pickers - Weekly Blog # 662

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Anticipating Topping US Stock Market

for Portfolio Managers vs. Stock Pickers

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

                           

                   

                           

Warning: How Markets Approach Tops

Perhaps fittingly, markets reach tops in a similar fashion to countries going to military wars. There are two phases. The first can go on for a lengthy period of a year or more, with the slow destruction of the ability to successfully fight back. The second is an immediate event, which galvanizes the opposing forces into military action. The assassination of the Archduke in WWI and the Attack on Pearl Harbor in WWII are two examples. In both cases the general population was not paying attention to the deteriorating conditions and they were truly surprised by the triggering events. Those in power were not surprised that an event could trigger hostilities and there were premature warnings if one looked for them.

With the US stock market nearer a probable peak than a bottom, I sense an oncoming peak followed by a meaningful decline. I just don’t know when, although I have a pretty good idea who will be blamed for it.

Topping Signs

The first sign is the public’s wish for a better year than the last, often expressed as a bigger gain in the US stock market. The raw gains for the Standard & Poor’s 500, with dividends reinvested, was +18.40% for 2020. A level roughly twice the long-term average of +9% to +10%. The average S&P 500 index fund, with $1.9 trillion entrusted to them, gained +17.91% with dividends reinvested and management, administrative, and transaction expenses deducted. As good as these results were, they were below the average return for US Diversified Equity Funds, a gain of +19.14% on $10.3 trillion in assets. Even with the history of a strong November and December being followed by a year producing returns of +10% or more, one should be cautious in expecting the 2021 return to be better than 2020. 

Excessive speculation with increased leverage weakens all but the strongest financial structures.  Excessive speculation is often an open invitation for enemies to embark on bold adventures (Pearl Harbor). There is no doubt we are experiencing rampart speculation, 2020 had the fastest bear market and included a record level of IPOs and an equal number of SPACs (Special Purpose Acquisition Company). In addition, 2020 saw a record level of margin debt and a new generation of inexperienced investors rapidly trading on home computers, somewhat like the “roaring twenties”. 

Accelerating inflation also weakens the defense mechanism of a society. The JOC-ECRI Industrial Price Index ended the year at +24.44%, with 81% of the weekly prices rising in the weekend edition of the WSJ. Other cracks are also visible in the economy, with landlords and their banks speculating on when and if their tenants will pay their rent. One also hears of some officially unemployed workers only willing to work off the books. Integrity is often forgone in periods of speculation and inflation.

We should not attempt to remove all speculation from the markets, as we would be killing opportunities to take risks that have paid off very well in 2020, shown in the performance of the following mutual fund averages:

Alternative Energy Funds     +92.89%

Global Science & Tech        +65.00% (C)

Science & Technology         +52.21%

Multi-Class Growth Equity    +42.89% 

(C) Canadian Information Technology stocks +80.65%

Typical Stock Pickers Play Differently

Picking stocks is an old art form encompassing both short-term gambling and long-term investing. One of the main mental attitude differences between an almost exclusive focus on picking stocks and portfolio management, is that stock pickers focus almost exclusively on the performance of individual holdings, whereas professional portfolio managers focus on the performance of the entire portfolio. This usually leads to a stock picker having a more limited number of holdings, with many driven by the same market dynamics. Many newer stock pickers are entertained by the frequent examination of price volatility, intending to hold if his/her stock prices rise relative to other immediate alternatives. The focus is often on what is happening in the market and/or in the headlines, not on the fundamentals of the company which happens to have the same name as the stock. If the stock disappoints, the player sells and either buys something else or totally withdraws from the market, until a new wave of speculation gets his/her attention. In viewing the history of stock-pickers, one is reminded of what is said about pilots “There are old and bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots.” 

That speculation burns out many inexperienced traders is unfortunate, not only for them but also for the nation. We have reached a point where the number of new companies equals the number retiring, either voluntarily or involuntarily. Among the reasons are demographics, labor and other capital productivity, regulation at various levels, and tax rates. One of the reasons US productivity was a world leader was the birth rate of new ventures and the success of some. Among the biggest advantages a stock picker has is that he/she does not have to play and record of results is not known. If the record is self-disclosed, it may not be believed. 

The Professional Portfolio Manager Plays a Different Game

The biggest risk for most professional managers is career risk, either losing employment or reputation. Furthermore, the portfolio manager is constantly being measured against supposed peers and externally identified time periods. At times absolute and relative investment performance are paramount and at others presumed risks is critical, whereas for some accounts cash generation is most important. For example, in 2020 the same account could be a relative leader or laggard and finish the year with very acceptable results, depending on the period selected. In some cases, when an institution borrows money during a period of economic strain, cash generation or volatility is critical to making payments or maintaining credit ratings. Because of COVID and a disruptive economy, some institutions have become much more sensitive to short-term results, whereas others look at the same characteristics through a longer-term lens and see new opportunities and risks.

In contrast to the stock picker, a portfolio manager looks at each investment not only in terms of its investment merit, but also its role in creating the appropriate balance in an account in terms of risk and reward. While a stock picker would ordinarily be delighted to have every one of his/her holdings do well, a professional portfolio manager would be concerned, fearing a change in the impetus driving the market could make the portfolio a very risky vehicle. In income-oriented portfolios, the timing of flows is critical to meet payment obligations and that can put constraints on the structure of the portfolio.

Unlike the private investor, most professional portfolio managers can’t afford to be out of the market, as most outstanding performance requires ownership on key turnaround days. The best a manager can do if the market is moving differently than what is perceived to be correct long-term, is shift the relative volatility of the portfolio, with a willingness to move quickly into higher volatility when the trend is what it should be.

How are You Protecting Against Unwarranted Speculation?

• Ignore?
• Raise Cash/Short-term vehicles?
• Change Volatility?
• Prune holdings which don’t help?
• Or something Better?   

I like quoting Ben Graham, not only because of his well-earned knowledge but because of the New York Society of Securities Analysts gave me an award named after him. He is quoted as saying “the essence of investment management is the management of risk, not the management of returns.”

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/12/stud-poker-new-swamp-game-weekly-blog.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/12/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/12/searching-for-surprises-weekly-blog-659.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

The Week’s Fashions and Our Most Dangerous Asset - Weekly Blog # 643

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

The Week’s Fashions and Our Most Dangerous Asset

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

There are instances where very current observations can have long-term implications. The week that ended last Thursday night was quite possibly such an instance. Each week I examine a report on the performance of over one hundred different investment objective peer groups. Since the competitive game, not the investment game, is beating “the market”, I look at what types of funds that have beaten the S&P 500 Index Funds average performance. In the quiet lazy summer week, the index gained +0.40%. The following is a list of the seventeen peer groups that beat the index:

Base Metals Commodities   +2.83%

Precious Metals           +2.43%          

Energy Fund Commodities   +2.11%         

Large-Cap Growth          +1.83%         

Science & Technology      +1.60%         

Global Science & Tech     +1.58%          

Multi-Cap Growth          +1.52%         

Convertible Securities    +1.37%        

Consumer Services         +1.25% 

General Commodities       +1.13%

Agricultural Commodities  +0.78%

China Region              +0.77%

Global Large-Cap Growth   +0.77%

Global Multi-Cap Growth   +0.70%

India Region              +0.61%

Alt. Active Extension     +0.49%

Telecommunications        +0.45%

Most of these leading groups have been leading for some time, benefitting from momentum. The commodity owning funds look forward to higher prices for them and inflation for their customers resulting from shortages of supply.

One could say that these groups were deemed attractive by some pundits and their followers. Thus, if one would invest in most of these, the bet is not on the fundamentals of the underlying companies and commodities, but on the expected pronouncements of various pundits. To me, this suggests that these funds are likely to be more volatile than most funds. Thus, they make sense for those who believe in their trading skills or have a firmly held view of the investment cycles of the future.

CASH Is the Most Dangerous Asset in the Portfolio

Cash is a dangerous asset, not because it may lose some value, but because of how we exit from it. Remember, almost without exception every single loser we have had started from exiting cash. Potentially, the biggest problem in having cash is the way we think about it, our portfolio, and ourselves.

Whether we have a thousand, ten thousand, one hundred thousand, a million, ten million, one hundred million, one billion, or ten billion, as we jump each successive hurdle it gives to us a different attitude about ourselves, our status among others, and the safety of our situation. However, these emotional and intellectual highs can be very misleading. 

Cash is a receipt from past activities and its value changes imperceptivity every day due to the interaction of currency and inflation. Additionally, changes in tax regulation and investment/legal practices change the purchasing power of cash. Another critical element impacting how we feel about cash and other attributes of wealth is the perceived wealth of others, either foolishly published or gossiped. (The wealthy lists are not adjusted for present debts or future commitments. Some multi-millionaires have assets tied up and have little or no “walking around money”.)

The expected use of cash defines the flexibility of wealth. Large families in terms of number or generation of people need to think about the state of their physical, emotional, and mental health when considering future spending. Only some family members and their highly trusted advisors have a real understanding of the extent of cash and other indications of wealth. Often, no one has a complete picture of the emotions attached to assets/liabilities and how that influences their disposition.

Working Toward Solution Suggestions

The best suggestion I have is to adopt a holding company philosophy like Berkshire Hathaway, which is a holding of some clients and held in personal accounts. With over 60 operating entities and over 100 separate financial centers, their current operations retain enough of their cashflows to meet current needs and send the excess to headquarters for future investments.

The first suggestion deals with the proper identification of reserves to meet specific needs. It can include specific elements such as buying future residential property, education expenses, specific medical needs, and a loss of employment reserves. Determining the size of the specific reserve will at best be guesswork, but some numbers are better than none. A much more difficult task is guessing the range of future dates when the reserves will be tapped. It is at this point that an intelligent allocation of cash and risk/return assets should be made. The closer the likely expenditures, the higher the allocation of cash or extremely high-quality short-term paper. However, there are risks associated with funding long term needs with short-term paper and cash. My own view would be the following reverse ladder:

• 100% cash for assets to be spent in the next 90 days
• 80% cash for assets to be spent one year in the future
• 60% cash for assets to be spent two years in the future 
• 50% and no higher in cash beyond that 

My second suggestion is to divide one’s portfolio into two separate parts, the reserve element just mentioned and an investment portfolio with at least a ten-year view, potentially extending beyond multiple generations.

The investment portfolio should avoid holding cash except for a tactical reserve, with a time lock forcing some commitment if the tactical reserve remains after 18 months. Remember the following things:

• In an investment portfolio cash is a decaying asset due to inflation and currency. 
• If you must reduce or eliminate cash, the investment opportunities are vast and include some relatively safe alternatives. 
• Long-term successful investors often go through periods where they are very lonely.     

 

Questions of the week: 

1. Do you monitor the opportunities to invest investment cash?
2. Do you review your reserves periodically to ensure that they are appropriate? 
3. What was the last time you adjusted your cash levels and what was the result? 

    

   

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/rotating-leadership-likely-on-horizon.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/more-to-learn-by-seeing-more-weekly.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.