Showing posts with label Chevron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chevron. Show all posts

Sunday, June 7, 2026

New Era? - Weekly Blog # 944

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

New Era?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

          

Evidence

After an extended period of daily market movements below 1% per day, the most meaningful stock market index fell -2.64%, with the technology sector falling much more. The 30-company Philadelphia Semiconductor Index which produces the critical needs for “AIs” explosive growth fell -10.3%, while the NASDAQ Composite fell -4.18%. (This is not the first decline for a new technology driven bull market, which was led by railroads, canals, and undersea cables in 1873. These stocks traded on exchanges in America, London, and Vienna. In Vienna the market dropped 45% in one day.) Despite the happy talk from Washington and various pundits, we have seen continued notices of layoffs from large, seasoned companies, including by Macy and Saks. In New Jersey, April unemployment was 4.8% vs 4.3% nationally. (It was just announced that Exxon and Chevron have changed their state of incorporation from New Jersey to Texas.) What is more significant to me is the number of bank branches that are closing. Perhaps more significant is the observable factor that attractive, wealthy women, are not wearing expensive jewelry while shopping or at performances.

 

Midweek, the AAII sample survey showed the market outlook for the next six months being 36% bullish and 37% bearish. (I suspect that if the survey was done after Friday’s market, we would have seen a bigger total for the bears). Interestingly, some stocks that typically don’t attract tech buyers, like Coca Cola* (+3.46%), Moody’s* (0.49%), and even Apple*, fell less than the market (-1.25%).

*Owned in managed or personal accounts.

 

My View 

Most analysts and pundits compare stock price performance to past cycles to determine investment policies, much like telling time with a stopped clock. Seldom in an investment career does it pay to look for meaningful structural change. One way to do this is to recognize that old firmly held beliefs, like a flat earth, keep us from falling into the abyss. Like Columbus, we should seek to find new riches by going against the popular view, putting faith in a compass over an orderly world view. Similar to Columbus I may be wrong, but I will hopefully reward my backers with fabulous wealth by addressing society’s real problem, far too many unproductive people. Not only are the young unproductive, but there are also healthy seniors not working for money or the good of society.

 

Today’s government employment data shows that there are sufficient job openings for all the unemployed, although the hirers say they can’t find enough people to meet their needs. Only 61% of our population are employed. I translate that to mean they can’t find people with the correct attitudes and education to meet their needs. This is an indictment of both our schools and homelife. To solve this problem, they should automate wherever possible, which can mean using “AI”. 

 

 For many years I boarded a 6 AM train with papers to read, reaching the office at about 7 AM prepared for my first meeting with colleagues or committee members of the New York Society of Securities Analysts, the trade association of my profession. I was not alone, I would meet other analysts outside their offices for a bite of breakfast, where executive committee members were also having breakfast with their direct reports or others that were on the way up. (This was not the normal day that the executive committee officially met, but they were still doing business.) After a full day working numbers and writing reports, I caught the 6 PM train home. I arrived at close to 7 PM and then spent time with my children going over how they spent their day. Thus, my workday was 12 hours, with some additional time spent on the weekend. I probably spent some 70 hours a week fighting my way up the ladder.

 

The law calls for a 40-hour week, which does not include lunch. Today, according to the Department of Labor, the average American works a little more than 34 hours a week and that time probably includes lunch. If you listen to the young people of today, they believe in a work/life balance of at least 50/50. No wonder our productivity grows at around 3%, which appears to be higher than in China.

 

“Evidently, when Trump visited Xi Jinping last month, the Chinese president made a pointed reference to the concept of overstretch. A concept that was put forward over two millennia ago by the ancient historian and general, Thucydides. Can China and the US overcome this trap? There is also the risk of war expenditures becoming greater than the rest of the economy. The current administration, unlike China, is extremely focused on short-term-announcements impacting the mid-terms. Strategically however, both the President and Xi Jinping are aware of the seminal work by Rear Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahon, titled The Influence of Sea Power Upon History.

 

See what you can do to increase productivity and put more of us to work for society. Your help is needed.

                                         

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Warnings Increasing - Weekly Blog # 943

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rhymes + Future Opportunities - Weekly Blog # 942

Mike Lipper's Blog: Many Trends Within the Same Market - Weekly Blog # 941

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please

subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2026

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Sunday, June 26, 2022

Switching Prime Focus - Weekly Blog # 739

                                    


Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings


Switching Prime Focus


 Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –




Functions of Analysts & Portfolio Managers

Many analysts who publish their work focus on just reported results, and to a minor extent estimates of the next to be reported results.

As a contrarian thinker, I am used to being lonely in examining longer-term results. Consequently, I accept that my views may well be very different than what occurs.

Portfolio managers should be focused on expected prices at termination of time periods critical to the account. That is the easer part of the job. The more difficult task is the construction of a portfolio to accomplish the investor’s goals within given time periods.

Both analysts and portfolio managers will only be right some of the time. The critical task is to limit the overall damage to the portfolio and achieve the best delivery for the investor.


Why Switching Now?

In almost all sports, as in life, the best results come from the appropriate combination of anticipatory aggressive and conservative moves.

Coming off a successful effort to call last’s week equity performance, where the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) generated an 800-point gain on Friday. News reports and commentaries have been more mixed than when I started to mention my more bearish comments over a year ago. With the NASDAQ in a bear market and both the DJIA and the S&P 500 in a correction, I should question my own views. (The S&P 500 was temporarily in bear market territory)


Bearish Comments

Former Democratic US Treasurer Larry Summers said, “We need unemployment above 5% to contain inflation for five years, 7.5% for two years, or 10% for one year.”

Corporations and individuals choose to move for a number of economic reasons, including the new location being better for their relocated and new employees. Citadel is moving its headquarters from Chicago to Miami. Both Chevron and Goldman Sachs are moving major portions of their office staff from crime infested, high tax states, to Texas. 

Copper prices have reached a 15-month low. A significant development due to its use in many manufactured products and economists calling it an economic predictor.

The prices paid for the “free lunch” SNAP program has risen 23% in a year. I don’t know how much of this is due to the war in Ukraine, but it does not seem this tragedy is going to get less expensive or end quickly.


Political Lessons

Almost all economic cycles are caused by humans. Among the easiest to spot and perhaps correct are those made by politicians in power from both major political parties.

Perhaps the single biggest problem created results from elected politicians turning over issues to non-elected administrators, which they do because they don’t have sufficient votes to pass them. 

For example, this weekend the decision on abortion was punted. Elected politicians in Washington, recognizing this topic was likely to split the population, decided to let the states decide. On Friday it went through to the Supreme Court, because in eyes of some, the local laws were in conflict with the US Constitution. We need to remember that the Supreme Court makes judgements based on law and legal precedent, not moral judgement. 

The mistake politicians in Congress made for a period of at least twenty years was asking candidates for their opinion rather than crafting a national law addressing the problem.

This is their common mistake, they turned to unelected and largely untrained administrators to solve a social problem. We see this approach being used for issues before the SEC, FTC, Treasury, State Department, Agriculture, Labor, Interior etc. (In my opinion, it is just a matter of time before various administrative decisions are struck down due to exceeding their legal mandate to act without passed legislation.)

One reason politicians act is polling, although polling has proven to be quite inaccurate in close elections. Polls are also conducted by low-cost brief phone calls to those willing to venture opinions to structured questions. 

In the days when I was interested in polling, I found how I asked the question influenced the answer. This is not an unusual view. It is no wonder a growing percentage of people called do not wish to answer the questions. These “no answers” are not tabulated or properly investigated.


Some Incomplete Conclusions

While I did not recognize it at the time, I took a graduate business school course entitled “Security Analysis” as an undergraduate at Columbia. The Professor was David Dodd, with the adjunct professor Benjamin Graham writing the first academically popular book on the subject. 

This is the course and book which provided the foundation for what has been called “value investing”. There were three problems in the way it was taught. 

  1. It was based on the investment experience in the 1930s that made both Graham and Dodd wealthy.
  2. Perhaps because of the constraints of a one-hour class, we were instructed to disregard inventories in our valuation and the recalculation of book value when restructuring balance sheets. This was a good first cut, but some finished product inventory had value. Also, debts could and were renegotiated to lower amounts. 
  3. The third set of missing elements were the items not on the balance sheet. For example, long-term leases on valuable locations, railroad right of ways, new valuable products under development, immature customer relationships, physical and other location advantages.

In my discussion with the good professor, he discarded my questions related to growth. What I now realize is that he was essentially teaching a course on the use of accounting statements for investing. These are necessary, but insufficient.

Today, a price/book value or tangible value is a paper cover of a book, not the book itself. Far too many investment reports state the relationship without detailed analysis.


Positives

The largest positive is that we have probably been in a recession for all of 2022, and possibly longer. Months later, NERA will identify when the official beginnings of the recession. Regardless, time spent on the way down eats into the time in recession, which on average lasts 32.5 months or a median of 27.1 months. 

The JOC-ECRI Industrial Price Index fell -0.44% this week because port delays got shorter and container rental prices dropped.

Both biotech/pharma and electronic technology are on the verge of exciting new products. For example, Apple’s AR headsets could open a new stream of products. (Apple is owned in personal accounts.)

Due to China launching its fourth super-carrier, defense procurement spending will eventually rise.


What to Look For?

I don’t know yet, but these are some of the things I am looking for:

  • Long-term survival skills. This means cutting some things to improve efficiency, but not a critical new product or service.
  • Investing in the right client relationships
  • Developing the right international friends
  • Securing the right financial relationships.


Final Thought

Is there a timing connection between the extreme AAII bearish reading of 59.3% and the recognition we are in a recession?


Please share your thoughts for the next great investment idea.



Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/are-markets-getting-too-far-ahead.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/pick-investment-period-strategy-weekly.html


https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/06/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings-how.html



Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com


Copyright © 2008 - 2022


A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.


Contact author for limited redistribution permission.