What We Should Have Been Watching? - Weekly Blog # 903

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

What We Should Have Been Watching?

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Lessons from the racetrack and life

At any given time, humans tend to congregate around what is most important to them or what is going to happen. These topics are labeled favorites, both at the track and by psychologists. On any given day at the track favorites win a minority of the races. More importantly, when favorites win the payoffs are relatively small, as the winnings must be shared with a large number who have reached the same conclusion.  Thus, backing the favorite is a low return game.

 

The problem in going with the less popular is their winning ratio is lower, as most people bet on the favorites. Thus, in terms of frequency, favorite betting wins.

 

There is a more rewarding goal, winning more money over time with less frequency but higher returns. This is the choice I learned at the track and apply to investing in securities.

 

This Week as an Example

Using the public media and limited public conversation, their favorite investment topic was the speech by Fed Chair Jerome Powell at Woods Hole, the implication of which was a cut in short-term interest rates. While most investors believe these are probably the most important questions to be asked, I believe there are more important questions with higher, longer-term implications. These can be grouped under labels of concentration and valuation.

 

Concentration

Much has been written about the amount of money invested in seven or ten largely technology/financial stocks. One study shows that the ten most popular stocks in the S&P 500 represent 38% of the total value of the entire index. On average, the ten largest market caps in the index between 1880 and 2010 represented only 24%. However, I question the math or source because railroads represented 63% of the stock market in 1881.

 

This observation is of particular interest to me as a graduate of Columbia College. Around 1880 Columbia had an endowment account restricted to investment in the most secure stocks. You guessed it, lawyers restricted the investments to railroads!! This particular endowment was to be spent on bricks for the campus. Thus, for many years all of Columbia’s buildings were brick faced.

 

There were many important implications that should have been drawn from this case, especially since every single railroad went into bankruptcy years later. However, if you had included political analysis along with legal analysis it was obvious railroads had become too powerful in the country.

 

In terms of political analysis and understanding how the US works politically, people should read a new 856-page book written by Bruce Ellig, a good friend of ours. The title of the book is “What You Should Know about the 47 US Presidents”. The book devotes a chapter to each President, covering the most important laws and regulations of his term. Included in the book is information about the President’s life and personal activities.

 

Valuations

John Auters of Bloomberg believes “valuations are extreme”. Prices in terms of sales, earnings, book value, and dividends are at a stretching point. In a recent survey of intuitional managers, 91% believe the US market is overvalued and 49% believe emerging markets are undervalued. Some 60 years ago I worked for a research-director who believed shipments of boxes were a good economic indicator. They probably still are, and that is why I took notice that they were down -5% in the second quarter.

 

With the federal government pushing to let retail investors participate in private capital transactions, particularly private equity, the health of the market for these longer-term, illiquid investments, could impact the listed market. There are approximately 3100 positions in private capital firms that are unsold. Their retail owners may not see the level of distributions they were expecting, which could unfortunately increase the volume of listed securities to be sold.

 

Long-Term Horizons:

 In the long run equity investing can generate very attractive returns. A dollar invested in the 1870 equity market by the 25th of July would be worth $32,240 in nominal dollars before taxes this year.

 

 As often said, history does not repeat but often rhymes. There are a number of parallels with the market crash of August 1929 to November 1936, and the economic depression that followed from February 1937 to February 1945, which will be discussed in upcoming blogs.

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Week That Wasn't - Weekly Blog # 902

Mike Lipper's Blog: DIFFERENT IMPLICATIONS: DATA VS. TEXT - Weekly Blog # 901

Mike Lipper's Blog: Rising Risk Focus - Weekly Blog # 900

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

My Outlook: Nervous Balances - Weekly Blog # 767

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

My Outlook: Nervous Balances

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Nervous Dilemma Positioning

My traditional allocation of stocks and bonds being close to a 70/30 split is somewhat misleading. A significant minority is in actively managed stock mutual funds with a financial services or international focus, often Asian. Financial services need a better label, so as to include two stocks of companies that are building their own portfolios that behave similar to variable annuities, Berkshire Hathaway and Apple. (The reason to call them annuities is that they are both primarily managed to produce long-term earnings, rather than current earnings.)

 

Financial services holdings as a group are also expected to fully participate in the growth of the US and International economies. In general, their strength is not in making loans, but in making money with equity. Consequently, one might characterize my equity investments as a combination of growth and value in more classical terms. This is appropriate as most companies have spurts of growth and value.

 

Time Horizons

For both my professional and personal/family accounts I start by designing portfolios built on an understanding (guess) of when and at what frequency the proceeds of the account will be delivered.

 

My particular situation is that I have a younger and healthy wife, with the fourth generation of the family begun. We are also committed to supporting the operational needs of a limited number of non-profits that Ruth and I have been involved with, both as volunteers and donors.

 

Short or Deep Recession?

I tend to look at various down periods through the late reporting of real net income (inflation/foreign exchange adjusted). Where possible, I prefer to use net operating income. Since 1970 the US has suffered 8 major declines of real reported income (-15% to -41%), with a median decline of about -28.5%.

 

The popular view today is that if we have a declared recession, it will be short and small. As someone who learned about odds at the New York racetracks I am nervous with popular views. Their payoffs are too small compared to the pain endured in the prior decline.

 

One theory of economic/market history is that declines are caused by imbalances, which are addressed during the recovery. If that pattern is followed in the next recovery, we may not yet have gone down enough. We need more time before the correction begins.   

 

The current path of major central banks is to follow the Federal Reserve Bank in attacking the supposed major cause of inflation with the only thing they can, short-term interest rates. The best definition of inflation is too many dollars chasing too few goods/services. The last two administrations contributed to these excess dollars, which were officially used to cushion the public’s loss of pre-COVID income with grants. (This was similar to the ancient Romans using bread and circuses to bribe people.) They are still at it!! This will make the Fed’s job more difficult and expensive.

 

Fewer people working should also drop the level of demand. However, despite all the increased regulation and required business spending, there are approximately 1.7 employees wanted for each current worker. This has created a situation where job switchers earn more than those who stay put. (If one really wanted to eliminate excess demand you could simply reduce restrictions on business.)

 

Thus, a shallow recession could be shorter if the federal government wasn’t playing both sides against the middle. This may happen later this year with their hope of a meaningful recovery by Election Day 2024.

 

Assuming this case, financial markets could start up as soon as economic indicators hit a bottom, with smaller declines. Which could happen this year. If this were to happen, our 70% equity stock fund portfolio would produce a nice but not great return. One area to consider for investment are funds that have lost money over the last 10 years through January 12. In general, these funds were victims of a strong US dollar. Included are funds invested in commodities, emerging markets based in local currencies, Latin Americas, and precious metals.

 

Second through Fourth Generations

While a recovery based only on lowering inflation and interest rates will generate returns for my wife and me, it would have little impact on succeeding generations, including various long-lasting charities.

 

The larger and longer-term problems that will reduce returns for succeeding generations will not be addressed by the level of interest rates. Most of these problems are related to people rather than numbers. These problems could be expressed as “Better for customers, workers, and owners”.

 

Below is a brief list of imbalances that should be addressed:

1.  Quality of leadership in each sector and operating unit of society, including levels of governments, segments of health and medical, education, and non-profits.

2.   Middle-class income as a percent of national income returning to levels of the past.

3.   Measured and productive population growth.

4.   Appropriate education for current and future needs.

5.   Governments of the people, by the people, and for the people.

 

Perhaps for the benefit of succeeding generations the appropriate investment strategy should include less exposure to risk until there is a deep enough decline to correct for imbalances.

 

Please tell me what you think?

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Next Election vs. Future Generations - Weekly Blog # 766

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Bear Market, Recessions, Reinvestment - Weekly Blog # 765

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Week in Conflict Leads to Buy List - Weekly blog # 764

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Changing Focus in a Changing World - Weekly Blog # 719

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Changing Focus in a Changing World

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Changing Focus

Securities analysts should come with two perspectives. The majority attempt to read the current minutiae of what companies are saying, with the goal of assessing the current price and the probability of relatively short-term future prices. The second perspective, rarely produced for public or client consumption, eventually pays bigger rewards when correct. 

For some time, this blog has highlighted the relatively unreported negatives concerning the current optimistic outlook. Entering 2022, there are more comments about risks and possible recessions, which while still in the minority of published opinion, has increased in coverage. At this point there are enough bearish comments, so I can move on to the much tougher challenge of finding reasons to be optimistic. The eventual major stock and bond market decline is inevitable, although I cannot identify the time and headlines that will label the decline. Furthermore, I cannot stipulate the length of the bear market, which is normally a function of what owners do, not what issuers do. In other words, from the current lofty levels I am beginning to look across the valley of disappointment to the beginnings of the next expansion. 

I look forward to learning the views of subscribers, both concerning the down phase and the recovery.

Changing Environment 

The future will contain a multitude of changes, many small, but a few unexpected by most will verge on being seismic. At some point in many developed countries, the growing size of government debt owed to non-citizens will be too large. Not only will foreigners refuse to buy more, but they are also likely to push for debt repayment, not rollovers. 

For many Central banks and commercial financial institutions, US debt is a prized asset. However, Mae West may finally be wrong in that “too much of a good thing is wonderful”. In 1990 the Federal Debt totaled $3 Trillion, now in under half of a lifetime it is $30 trillion. Politicians of both parties are responsible for this growth in our children’s and grandchildren’s debt. Interestingly, 35 of 50 states require balanced state budgets. (One can examine the financial health of the 15 states that don’t have this restriction, comparing local crime and inflation.)  While the growing debt is deplorable, it is probably a good indicator of how the government meets its other responsibilities. (Some houses never have a single broken window.)

Looking at the implication of the growing debt and its likely impact on the investment environment in 30 years. The debt will impact our children’s assets and the future value of what our grandchildren inherit. It would be prudent to expect taxes of all sorts to increase. Increased taxes will lower the reported earnings of companies and will probably delay the dividend increases the third generation may be living on. Will it likely lead to lower price/earnings ratios? (Since the 1950s we have generally benefited from rising earnings multiples.)

There are at least two other changes to our investment environment, both positive if one’s portfolio is properly positioned. The first is that winning companies and institutions, no matter what they do, will make progress by improving customer service. Because technology will likely continue to lower the costs to manufacture and transport, the winners will have the attitude of successful service companies.

We are already seeing the third trend that is going global. Year-to-date figures show the US market declining more than 5%, while Brazil is up +10%, Greece +8.5%, South Africa +6%, and Chile +6%. Five other countries have positive equity markets. We are also seeing positive fund flows into Western Europe, Japan, and Emerging Markets. This is probably not a short-term phenomenon. While one can understand a certain reluctance to disclose critical information in patent applications, the number of patents granted suggests a large amount of technology innovation is taking place outside the US. The percentages of patents awarded in 2021 was: China 49, Japan 15, South Korea 11, US 10, and Europe 8.

Changing Companies

Many companies continually evolve, some more dramatically than others. As my primary focus is financial companies, I see some making changes that should impact earnings patterns in the future. Goldman Sachs (*) is developing a retail banking base to fund their investment banking activities. It is my speculation that when Buffett and Munger are no longer involved with Berkshire Hathaway (*), shareholders will own more than one stock certificate. Over time it is reasonable to assume a number of their activities could generate higher stock prices if separated. I also suspect that if the Fed, FDIC, and Treasury come under more restrictive management, a number of banks will split their activities requiring a bank license, placing the more profitable businesses in another company. Watch JP Morgan Chase (*) for such a move within ten years. The financial sector may initiate dramatic changes in how they manage their human relations and work from home activities.

(*) Owned in managed accounts or personal accounts.

Changing Investors

The current effort of some governments to regulate an increasing amount of corporate activity through regulatory bodies will drive more investment into private companies. There is already some level of private market transactions, which will increase. NASDAQ (*) has been active in this, as have a number of brokerage firms and banks. This drive may well lead to more cross border transactions. In dealing with private companies, valuations are often based on verifiable sales data, which includes a price/sales comparison. There is a lot of room for such transactions. For example, the P/S ratio for the Russell 1000 Growth is 5.12X, with the MSCI World ex US Small Cap being 1.05X. 

In terms of investment sophistication, there are private investors capable of protecting themselves as smaller institutional investors. There are times where not being public is better for both the company and its investors. In many cases these investors have entered a second career as a supervisor or confidant to multi-generational family assets.

Question: In your thinking about the future, what changes are you expecting and how will you handle them?

  

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/things-are-seldom-what-they-seem-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/two-critical-questions-weekly-blog-717.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/current-causes-of-concern-weekly-blog.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Two Critical Questions: - Weekly Blog # 717

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Two Critical Questions:

I.  Can Performance Replace Diversification and Create Too Much Risk?  

II.  Is January 2022 the Beginning of the Bear Market?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Are the Answers Linked?

The youth of today, with all their expensive schooling, are at a distinct disadvantage. They have not studied ancient history or the leaders and common people living through those periods. In their limited time, if they could study just two periods, they might find relevant answers to questions with implications for today. The development and collapse of the Roman Empire and some of the structural causes of WWI. 

As this is an investment blog, I won’t teach history in detail. The following is a list of historical topics with significant implications for today. They may help answer the two questions asked:

1. The tension between a divided Roman Senate and the leadership of the strongest state in the world.
2. The most technological roads and viaducts also helped weaken defenses.
3. The rising costs of “gifts to the people” became necessary bribes, reducing military spending.
4. While a lose collection of German tribes eventually ran over Rome, they could not agree on how to govern their conquest.
5. Compared to the cohesion of other European countries, Germany was late in unifying and did not have nearby land to grow.
6. The Holy Roman Empire, based in Vienna, was structurally weak.
7. France lost 25% of their young men in the Franco-German War, the most productive people in their country.
8. Making the loser pay for the winners’ costs through reparations failed, and in so doing ignited global inflation, leading to many autocratic governments, including the US.

The Positive and Destructive Power of Performance

(Historical Notes: In the mid-1960s, I was one of the very few securities analysts focused on what were called conglomerates. As an analyst, my research I sold to financial institutions, largely in the US, but also in the UK, Continental Europe, and Canada. Consequently, I became conscious of multi-industry companies in their countries too. My early analysis focused mostly on US auto parts and bicycle parts manufacturing companies, then gravitated to electronics companies, particularly those with defense and aircraft applications.)

From the beginning of recorded history, the danger of relying on a single or a few similar clients was clear. (Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice” demonstrates the risk of a merchant’s wealth being tied up in a single voyage.) To avoid such risks, the more enterprising merchants evolved into merchant banks, with multiple clients in multiple trades. Famous Scottish trusts developed investment vehicles for the wealthy and lower classes, investing not only in voyages, but also in a wide array of stocks and bonds. They paid attention not just to investment performance, but also to the longevity of their businesses.

A handful of Boston Law firms began as custodians for the wealth of ship captains on their Asian voyages. They developed documents hoping to limit the risk of total disaster by minimizing the risk in stocks, investing the remaining assets in supposedly super-safe bonds. It was out of this colonial heritage that Boston based firms developed the first US mutual funds, utilizing their successful Balanced Funds business.

The Boston law firms had their own security analysts and portfolio managers until at least the 1960s. Their legal documents proscribed diversification rules to lower the risk of total loss during hard times. Thus, the need for diversification came into usage in the institutional asset management business and appealed to insurance companies who had similar rules.

The Problem with Two Asset Type Diversification

If the two asset types were totally uniform, one could control the risk of large losses. Losses were significantly reduced by requiring the investment of 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds, at cost. While this worked for the lawyers and their naïve clients, security selection remained a risk. Including the selection from among so-called “high-grade” stocks and bonds of different maturities and liquidity. 

Asset managers whose customers were primary interested in upside performance found the restraints too limiting, particularly during periods of inflation. To get a more appropriate measure of fund risk, I tried to group funds taking similar risks. By the end of the 1980s my firm had created over 100 separate peer groups for performance measurement purposes. There are probably an unknown number of new peer groups that would be useful today.

When I privately compare funds, I go beyond just security selection. Among the things I look for are:

• Portfolio turnover
• Whether the portfolio is collegially managed or has a single decision maker
• The size of the firm’s research effort
• Tax management
• The historical recognition of losses
• The availability of back-up people
• Trading and administrative skills available within the group

All these measures are useful in reducing investor risk. However, better relative performance in one segment can diminish the power of diversification in limiting risk.

Where Are We in 2022?

While we have only experienced three weeks of the new year, we have been confronted with a very different market and performance environment. With a lot to identify and interpret, I am using fund performance as an intermediate filter to examine what is happening. I’ve observed meaningful changes, raising questions about the normal desire to extrapolate past performance trends. I find the following significant:

1. Through Thursday, with Friday having an additional significant loss, most fund peer groups experienced single digit losses. The sole double digit loss was the e-commerce business.
2. The very few US registered mutual fund gainers have been international funds, with strength in emerging markets, commodity funds, and global energy vehicles.
3. Large-Caps have fallen less than the smaller-caps, suggesting larger-caps have earned a liquidity premium.
4. The average stock in the broad indices is down considerably more than the relevant cap-weighted index.
5. JP Morgan released a study of thematic fund performance, which was no better than the general market measures.

What Does the “Tech” Correction Mean for the Future?

(Remembering that the sole function of fluctuating markets is to produce humility in the survivors, and my assertion that I can and will be wrong, there are reasons to be concerned.) The history of peaks and bubbles shows good performance in a small minority of traded issues at the top. The good performers, in this case a limited number of large-cap tech stocks, have drained dollars out of the rest of the market.

As readers know, I view moves in the NASDAQ Composite as leadership in the entire US market. From its all-time high, the index is down 14.5%, clearly a correction. I believe the Russell 2000 is in correction as well. At some point, I guess the more senior measures will close the gap with the NASDAQ. The interesting thing is the size “off” volume at the NYSE and NASDAQ are about the same.

I have been concerned about the underlying economy showing some disturbing signs:

1. The lowest interest rates in 5000 years, until the Fed’s future small moves. The adjustable mortgage interest rate is showing some contrary trends e.g., the 3-year rate rose 12 bps this week, vs 3 bps for the 20-year.
2. Capital expenditures are being spent on supply issues rather than “greenfield” expenditures. This is indictive of a lack of confidence in the longer-term future.
3. China is having problems with a peaking workforce, although its currency is rising against the dollar.
4. The US stock market is being driven by shorter-term players, with more volume in ETFs than the more retirement oriented conventional mutual funds.
5. There is a significant trend of bank branch closures. I expect to see more retail mergers and growth in crypto-currency vehicles. The average young person has much less cash than we did at a similar age.
6. A focus-group of independents who each voted for both Biden/Obama and Trump, are concerned about crime and the way the current economy is being managed. With worries about the future, these concerns could lead to a consumer-based recession. (With rare exception, there is not a popular political leader globally, although the opposition currently lacks much support.)
7. The National Science Foundation published a report on the state of US Science & Engineering. the report shows the US losing leadership to Asia (China, Japan, and South Korea), measured in dollars expended. Considering wages are less in Asia than in the US, the Asians may be getting more for their money.

Working Conclusions

If the correction in capital-intensive Tech and Health companies accelerates, it could cause an overall decline in the stock market. Much like in the run-up to The Depression, it could cause some consumers to cut back their spending, leading to a consumer recession. It doesn’t have to happen, and the timing may be uncertain, but based on the subjects not being taught, the odds favor it. 

  

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/current-causes-of-concern-weekly-blog.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/deeper-thoughts-weekly-blog-715.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2022/01/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Are We Strolling the Promenade Deck of the Titanic? - Weekly Blog # 665

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Are We Strolling the Promenade Deck

of the Titanic?

Are there Parallels?

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

In the early morning of April 15th,1912 the largest ocean liner afloat sank. The ship was supposedly unsinkable, yet five days after its maiden voyage it sank, with a substantial loss of life and confidence. Are there parallels to the global stock markets? I do not know, but there are sufficient lessons that can be learned from the losses sustained almost one hundred years ago.

Parallels

Titanic 1912

As with any tragedy there were errors of both commission and omission, summarized as follows:

• Recognition of the impact of weather: Unusually warm April weather over the northern icepack detached an unexpected flow of icebergs of several miles, plus. the combination of a moonless night and glasslike seas.
• The owner’s decision to increase the speed to 24 knots (25 miles per hour) to achieve a record crossing for publicity purposes.
• An inexperienced crew properly trained for emergencies led to confusion regarding the proper off loading and fully loading of lifeboats.
• The ship was briefly turned the wrong way while the radio room crew dealt with faulty equipment as it sent out the social messages of passengers.
• The belief that four watertight compartments could keep the ship afloat, except from the top. (Six compartments were ruptured with long glancing blows below the waterline.)
• Failure to instruct and lead passengers in evacuation procedures.

The errors could essentially be summed up in terms of speed and surprises.

Concerns of Global Stock Market Parallels - 2021-?

Since the beginning of time markets have collapsed under excessive speculation, driven at high speeds with too much lose debt creation and growing social structural imbalances, needing only a surprise and an event. Some of each of these are already now present, except for “the event”. Apart from hitting an iceberg, we may already be experiencing some of the other characteristics presaging the bursting of a bubble. I hope not, but much like the lookouts on the Titanic I perceive some unexpected things ahead.

Clues

Markets depend on speculation to determine prices as it views the future and compares it to the present. This is healthy and only becomes dangerous when it gets too popular and raises prices way above a sustainable level, depriving more mundane investments of investment support. 

• This week, the stocks showing the biggest price gains were in order: solar, electric vehicles, energy, China tech, and emerging markets. 
• The biggest flows went into commodities and global stocks. High yield (formerly called “junk” bonds) rose twice as much as investment grade bonds. 
• An indication of speculation at one main street broker is the over three times as much money going into exchange traded funds (ETFs) as going into mutual funds.
• Margin debt in November set a record and is probably still rising. The banking system can earn an acceptable return leaving money at the Federal Reserve, which has opened the opportunity to other credit providers who have fewer loan-quality constraints.
• Increased volatility is usually looked at in terms of rapidly rising prices, but it also reflects sharply falling prices e.g., SPACS after mergers. This may be why the average dedicated short mutual fund gained +12.27% vs +1.52% for the average S&P 500 index fund in the latest week.
• Survey data is again found to be wanting, in this case beyond the realm of politics. The Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank survey of Manufacturing predicted a gain of +11.8% vs +26.5% actual, not a useful navigational aide.

Debt can be used to pay for operating expenses or expand capacity. In the first case it fills a hole left by equity not used to pay for the debtor’s current operations. It is thus a substitute for equity capital but does not provide capital for expansion. Currently, most debt raised by individuals, companies and governments is not used to add people, improve productivity, or expand capacity. Thus, debt is not being used to invest in the future and its repayment will be a burden on the future, unless there is high inflation.

The CEO of the company owning the Titanic issued orders but was not in a position to see if they were quickly and efficiently carried out. Considering the difficulties the new administration is having with Congress and within its own party, one wonders about the actual results of its announced policies?

The Remaining Question

Since investors cannot avoid periodic downturns, how should they manage their portfolios? I do not know of a good cookbook type recipe answer. I suspect the multiple answers will largely be a function of your ability to withstand pressure on your invested financial, emotional, and intellectual capital. The most vulnerable will be agents managing other people’s money, who have career risk. The least pressure for the self-assured is managing your own capital, as you don’t have to endure unexpected calls on capital. Most professional managers are much more in the career risk camp. For them, the key question is the acceptable level of decline from peak and the expected time until the account fully recovers. Another question might be how much longer the capital base takes to fully reach the expected level. The successful manager’s business longevity has as much to do with his/her communication skills.

At the other extreme is the manager of her/his own capital. While no one can unseat this manager, they are at risk of doing great damage to their capital by unwisely shifting policies to accommodate current market styles. Very few investors are successful at repeatedly changing styles. I have been investing for sixty years and during that period I have been lucky enough to own positions that have risen in price by many multiples of their original cost. However, I have also had a limited number of positions that have turned out to be worthless, or close to it. The nice thing is that the mistakes lose a percentage of wealth, whereas the winners grow exponentially. This week I noticed that one of my financial services holdings quadrupled in price, although I have owned it since 1991. A good, but not spectacular 7.2% return per annum. My correct bet was that the company’s management were big shareholders and were good at what they were doing. The key to their investment success was that as their business changed, they also went through successive management changes. Technologically, the firm is a great deal different than the 1991 model, but their attention to the needs of their employees and customers is very much the same.

Conclusions

1. We cannot avoid meaningful declines; they are only a matter of time. One needs to be prepared for declines and increases that last longer than expected.
2. Patience and communication skills are of equal importance to success, as is the never-ending development of investment skills.

What Do You Think? 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/01/contra-messages-weekly-blog-664.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-wisdom-of-3-wise-men-weekly-blog-663.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/01/anticipating-topping-us-stock-market.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

“New Normal” Unlikely to be a Repeat - Weekly Blog # 635

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

“New Normal” Unlikely to be a Repeat

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Analysts love history, believing the future will be a repeat of the past. Almost every force for change today is itself changing. There is so much changing that there is a great temptation to retreat to cash or a central value index. Quite probably, the least realistic and useful diagram for the future is a straight line. However, there are a series of mathematical manipulations that may be useful in identifying the multiple “New Normals” we will go through.

I believe it was in the second year of algebra that we were introduced to simultaneous equations. In these equations each formula has a different unknown, requiring each to be solved before completing the entire equation. There were other useful exercises that could also be helpful in our search for an investment strategy. The first, which was mislabeled as geometry rather than logic, was proving theorems. In that exercise we segregated math formulas between those that supported the theorem and those that did not. The correct solutions were based on the logic displayed, not the number of pros and cons. Perhaps the most useful math we learned was the math dealing with circles and semi-circles. I believe that learning to think in circular patterns is much more representative of the reality of human (market) behavior.

Where We Are is More Important Than How Far We’ve Traveled
Utilizing the two-sided balance sheet approach, I will divide the current inputs between those I perceive as positive for long term investing in equities and stock funds vs. those that increase the risks of losing money.

Positives
In analyzing data we look for indicators that on balance successfully predict the future. Positive indicators are normally correct more than half the time. However, what is even more valuable are the rare negative indicators. On a contrarian basis they are correct more than 75% of the time.

1. One of the best negative indicators is the sample survey of the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII). In the latest week, for the second week in a row, the survey is increasingly bearish, 48.9% and 47.8% respectively. A more normal three-part distribution has numbers in the thirties, as it was three weeks ago when it was 38.1%. Rarely do the weekly readings go over 40% and it is extremely rare for any choice to exceed 50% for the six-month outlook. 
2. Private clients at a large US brokerage firm bought equities for the first time in eleven weeks.
3. Individual investors are not constantly wrong, although they tend to make up their minds slowly and consequently tend to be wrong at turning points. (Data is no longer corrected on transactions below 100 shares, so we can no longer use the odd-lot theory.) If we look at total flows, we see net purchases of $11.3 billion for fixed income securities and funds, including $2.6 billion going into TIPS and $5 billion net outflows from Equity. These flows are forcing the prices of fixed income products up and their yields down. This reflects market action and is not a predictor of future interest rates.
4. We appear to be in two different markets at the same time. The daily stock price chart for the NASDAQ Composite is in an uptrend and has been establishing new highs. The other two main market index price charts look to be forming a temporary top, despite 24% of the S&P 500 being invested in FAANG stocks plus Microsoft. In 2013 the same stocks represented 9% of the index.
5. Rising freight volume carried in trucks is expanding, leading to capacity expansion.

Negatives

1. The Citigroup Panic/Euphoria Model is predicting a bearish period one year away.
2. Investors are pouring money into fixed income, even though there is a long-term expectation for higher interest rates driven by inflation. One example of this is a repeated issue of a 100-year bond from Austria, a country without a particularly bullish outlook. A pitch used to sell very long bonds is that it avoids having to make more frequent decisions, which can be wrong!!!
3. Some US investors are investing outside the US or the dollar. Of the 25 best performing mutual funds this week, 16 were precious metals funds (gold), 3 were emerging markets funds, 2 were China Region funds, 2 were India funds, and only 2 were invested in domestic small caps. Except for the precious metals group, the individual holdings in the other 9 funds appear more important that a sector bet.
4. The VIX indicator of worry is selling at twice last year’s rate.
5. Friday’s volume rose, which is not normal in the summer months, revealing interesting results that need to be further examined. The stock of T. Rowe Price lost 7.62% for the week, even though it published good results. On Friday, Janus Henderson had a market volume of 10.66 million shares, where the normal volume is 1-2 million shares.

Conclusions

1. We should not expect some clear straight-line news any time soon. That is not to say various pundits will not extoll these points of view, but on careful examination the precision of their views will come into question.
2. Despite what various political leaders state, we live in an increasingly integrated world and that is a net good thing, although it has a price, among other difficulties.
3. At today’s prices we are being paid to take long-term equity risk and are not being compensated similarly for fixed income risk taking.
4. We should focus on the announcement of capital expenditures in order to see how much is being invested in new products and new distribution, or see if it is being used to lower existing costs.

What Do You Think?   

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/06/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/06/data-driven-reactions-dangerous-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/06/caltech-data-heretics-go-to-track-for.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at
AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA
All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Long-Term Investors, Mistakes Ahead - Weekly Blog # 624

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Long-Term Investors, Mistakes Ahead

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

We wish and hope that all of our readers and
their loved ones are in good health and none
suffer from Covid-19 and its aftermaths.

Investing is, or should be, a series of learning experiences. In the long-term, we apparently learn more from our mistakes than from our “successes”. One puzzling occurrence that I have noted are some individual and institutional investors making repeated mistakes that impact their long-term investment results. At critical points in time, instead of utilizing their usual contemplative decision making, they allow emotions to drive decisions. I believe we are approaching a juncture where a sizeable number of otherwise smart investors make investment decisions that significantly hurt their future long-term returns, if not reversed.

The Focal Point of Large, Sudden Recoveries
We hit a “stealth” bottom on March 18th, with a “test” on March 23rd, in the US and many other markets. (A test occurs below or higher than the first bottom, but critically does not lead to more selling and substantially lower prices.) Since these low points, some mutual funds have jumped by 40% or more. In just the last trading week, the 25-best performing mutual funds gained between +35% and 21.36%. Traditional investors could choose to ignore these results due to the performance leaders likely making successful extreme bets. Relative to the impact on the wealth of the total investor population, the performance of the 25 largest long-term funds is relevant. It’s also worth noting from a national economic standpoint that the performance of the middle of the road “Core” equity funds is especially important, as this is where the largest portion of individual and institutional money is invested. I believe it is significant that the best performing large mutual fund for the week was American Fund’s Washington Mutual Investors. It rose +10.03%, while the worst all large-cap equity funds, a global equity income fund, gained +4.98%. To put this perspective, annualizing the gain of +4.98% would surpass 250%, an impossibility. This demonstrates how unusual the week was.

Ok it is Unsustainable, Now What? = Mistakes
There are three mistakes people make when investment performance appears too good.

• An immediate attempt to lock-in an unsustainable gain, a smart decision if one is never to invest again. The first problem in selling at the presumed top is that it puts a high premium on making two correct investment decisions consecutively. The skill to recognize tops and bottoms are quite different. Recognizing the present situation while fathoming the future, or more correctly futures, is quite different. Remember, many investors believe the sole reason for the market decline in the February-March period was the Coronavirus, not our concern of a tactical and strategic slowdown in earnings power generation. (The odds on identifying future trends different from those extrapolated from the present is probably 50% to 65%, allowing for the occasional surprise.) 
• The nature of critical turning points is the second problem. Almost by definition a turning point is when the bulk of trading actively changes radically, an emotional change. To be in a position to timely anticipate the change you must believe you can accurately feel what the crowd is thinking and when it is changing. From a profit and loss standpoint, there is no difference between being premature and wrong.
• The third hurdle is the assumption that the investor completely knows of any changes in demand placed on the advisor of the capital in the investment account. As an investment advisor I have never been comfortable with such assertions by others, or myself. We live in an uncertain world.

Another group of investors that has a substantial proportion of their wealth uninvested is driven by “FOMO” (Fear Of Missing Out). They want to quickly make up for lost time and get invested in stocks that are moving up. Their answer is to jump on whatever is moving most. This is called momentum. The problem with this choice is that after the original investors’ needs are met, as the only thing driving these stocks higher are other momentum players who may quickly move on to other investments.

To avoid these problems, if you find yourself with excess capital after filling all your essential reserve requirements, I suggest you divide the excess capital into perhaps ten segments, then invest a segment on each down day, which often fall on Fridays. For those more long-term oriented who have obligations to others, I suggest with bias that they consider a portfolio of mutual funds, allowing professionals to make tactical decisions.

A Contrarian’s Dilemma
Almost all investment courses take the easy way out by statistically analyzing financial statements and past economic conditions. The reality is the value of a stock is comprised of two very different aspects. While the first is taught, the second relies on the attitudes of those with buying power. This in turn is impacted by the buyers urgency to buy and the present owner’s urgency to sell. Price is where the two forces meet, with the next price a function of the size of the commitment of both sides at current prices. If the competing buyers have more money, the sellers will benefit from a higher price. If the seller demonstrates a larger desire to offload his/her merchandise, the intelligent buyer will get a temporary bargain. This equilibrium price is not only recorded in the regulatory records, but is also remembered by the participants and those who analyze their actions, e.g. market or technical analysts who don’t have the benefit of the specific motivations behind the trade. When there are a significant number of price changes in one direction, a trend is identified. No trend goes on forever and eventually reverses. A successful contrarian attempts to capitalize on trends that reverse direction. Historically, the trend best expected to reverse is the one trumpeted by many “experts”, or other pundits. Most of them currently anticipate further single digit gains following those generated since mid to late March. With the preponderance of investors sharing that view, I as a contrarian (long-shot better) am wondering whether we are setting up for a period of double-digit future gains?

This is where market analysis might foretell the future, without knowing the motivation of future buyers and sellers. Because of my background in analyzing mutual funds and similar vehicles, I often turn to their performance data for clues. For the last five years through Thursday’s close the three largest categories by current assets have produced very sub-par compounded returns: US Diversified Equity +3.83%, Domestic Long-Term Fixed Income +2.09 %, and World Equity +0.24%. None of these averages meet actuarial requirements or satisfy planned endowment expenditures. This suggests that many pension and probably other retirement funds, including endowments, are underfunded, potentially requiring larger future contributions and lower reported earnings, or in the case of endowments less ambitious plans. They could also be bailed out by a significant period of gains over 20%. (It used to be that gains over 20% were excluded in actuarial calculations.)

As someone who must meet payroll and other business and family expenses, I cannot completely live in the world of market analysis or contrarianism. Thus dear reader, please send me a message of what will motivate buyers of securities enough to raise returns to high single digit levels, with an occasional low double-digit gain year and only minor declines. I need help!!

Long Shot
As is often the case, the solution could come from beyond the present universe where we have the vast bulk of our assets. Perhaps there will be a reversal in the value of the safe-haven dollar, without medical and demographic plagues interfering with them. Emerging markets, with particular emphasis on Asia and later Africa, are currently an unpopular area. Both could make sense for our younger grandchildren, or more likely great grandchildren, but it won’t meet retirement needs or the needs for better educational diversity and other worthwhile goals.

Question: How are you addressing your investments today in order to meet longer-term needs? 



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/04/time-to-get-out-of-foxhole-weekly-blog.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/03/where-we-are-depends-on-where-we-have.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/03/stealth-bottom-and-other-considerations.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Architectural Sway Points and Current US Stock Market - Weekly Blog # 611

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Architectural Sway Points and Current US Stock Market

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Most of the time very tall buildings and highly valued stock prices don’t fall, but history shows that it is smart to worry about the possibility of it happening.

Buildings that are over 100 floors are largely a U.S. phenomenon. During the early days of New York’s World Trade Center, I was asked to join a luncheon club on the top floor of one of the towers. In the ride up to the club the elevator noticeably swayed. Upon arriving at the top, I could see for many miles out of the windows. I watched planes flying up the Hudson River that were below where I was standing. When pressed to join the club I commented that international clients were important to me and my business. I felt that these clients would be nervous due to the lateral movements of the elevator and the thought that they were above planes in flight. I was told not to worry as the lateral movements in the elevators would be dampened, and they were.  As the planes could clearly see the World Trade Center Towers, they wouldn’t fly too close. The increase in wind velocity from ground level to the 100th floor was anticipated by the architects, who allowed the building to sway in order to absorb the energy of the winds.

Unfortunately, as with many assurances, they did not address all risks that could befall those in the higher floors of the WTC. I had neglected to consider the landlord being the Port Authority. As its own governing body, the Port Authority did not need to abide by the stricter rules of the New York Fire Department regarding the width of the stair wells and some other fire precautions. Nor did I contemplate Boeing developing commercial aircraft capable of carrying more fuel than other airliners. Most importantly, I did not consider those planes being used as guided missiles. Nor did anyone else.

This is not the first time a structure tilted measurably. The leaning Tower of Pisa has become a teaching site in terms of soil movement, foundations, and architecture. We are now assured that tall buildings constructed after the tragedy of 9/11 will have a far lower death count and will probably remain upright.

Can we compare the attack on tall buildings and their ultimate collapse to the current US stock market? I clearly don’t know, but the life-altering experience of 9/11 causes me to wonder. Which assurances given will be proven to be somewhat faulty due to unexpected changes in conditions? As a professional investor for others, I feel compelled to consider the fall from high stock prices.

Being a numbers guy and learning from the great educational institution of the racetrack, the first thing I do is look at the long-term odds. From 1928 through 2019 there have been 92 years of data. Breaking the data into performance slices, the 30% gain for the S&P 500 Index in 2019 ranks in the top 21% for all periods. To expect similar results for 2020, or any subsequent year, is like betting on favorites at the track. It is generally not consistently a rewarding approach.

For the last decade S&P 500 Index Funds have grown at a 12.98% annualized rate. Mutual funds that did well during this period were growth oriented and had substantial investments in technology and consumer services. The worst performing funds were invested in natural resources. These trends appear to be continuing in 2020. Through Thursday, 13 of the top 25 mutual funds for the week were growth focused and 6 were technology oriented.

One of the lessons learned from the track is that good near-term performance brings more money, a bet on the continuation of the trend. At the track, the weight of money lowers the pay-off odds, which must be split among more bettors. In the investment races popularity attracts competition, as well as more scrutiny from governments and others who seek to share in the gains of investors.

One way to avoid some of the risks inherent in today’s large-cap growth stocks and funds is to re-examine small-caps and emerging markets. You could also examine a group like natural resources which has not had positive performance for a decade, with a particular focus on energy.

Question for the week: If you made a list of your fundamental investment beliefs and were forced to rank them, which of your top five could prove to be harmful due to changing of conditions?



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/01/how-much-will-markets-decline-10-25-or.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/12/repeat-past-history-probable-or-just.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/12/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Contrarian Stock and Bond Fund Choices - Weekly Blog # 604

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Contrarian Stock and Bond Fund Choices

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

WHY DON’T WE FEEL BETTER?
During the week the three major stock indices reached peak levels and finished less than 1% from their top closing prices. However, last week’s Dow Jones list of weekly price changes indicated that most prices declined for the first time in my memory, with 68% of the prices falling. During past peak periods stock prices generated enthusiasm, something not prevalent today.

General attitudes toward the market are often better expressed by the performance of selected mutual fund portfolios than the precepts of some publishers. The average performance of the 7,539 mutual funds in the Lipper US Diversified Equity Funds universe reflects real expenses, flows, and cash reserves. Through last Thursday’s close the average year-to-date gain was +23.05%, almost three times the normal +8.36% average annual long-term growth of capital for the past five years.

One would have to believe that we have entered a magical era where past experiences are not relevant for this to continue. Even the most optimistic long-term pundits are not suggesting that future sales, earnings and dividends can command stock prices to rise and produce future gains of 20%. Any significant increase from the low to mid-single digit numbers currently being produced creates an unusual level of price risk.

I am sensing a bifurcation of market prices as popular stock indices benefit from the rising prices of an increasingly smaller number of stocks, with few stocks gaining 20% or more. Many stocks are only generating gains that match their single digit earnings, assuming they are growing at all, despite a remarkably strong economy.

I am concerned that analysts are jumping to favorable conclusions without thinking about how our economic system works. This week a long discussed potential merger between Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade was announced. Charles Schwab is a holding in our private Financial Services Fund and TD Ameritrade is the second largest discount broker after Schwab.

Pundits calculated what Schwab’s’ earnings would be if the merged companies saved only half of the acquired firm’s expenses (called a “one and done” deal), but it does not take into consideration the competitive and market reaction to a potential deal. Furthermore, you might see lower pricing in the profitable arena of wealth management services, particularly through investment advisors. Lower net fees have contributed to the profit squeeze in the investment business.

WHAT TO DO?
Financial history is replete with tales of supposedly bright people fleeing a falling market and failing to come back in to benefit from a subsequent rising market. To prevent falling into this apparent safety trap, I among others have developed a practice of always keeping some money in so-called risky assets.

There are two primary ways to maintain exposure to a risk portfolio.

1. Shed most, if not all, low growth stocks/funds in favor of reserve building. Some with enough market experience can do this well, but not many, as committing cash in a down or even a flat market takes internal fortitude. Cash becomes too comfortable, making it is easy to postpone re-entry while you wait for some event, which may or may not happen.
2. A second approach also divides the portfolio into two sub-portfolios. The first sub-portfolio contains securities of extreme faith, or stocks that might crater by 50% or more in reaction to unfavorable news. To make it worthwhile being a long-term holder of such former wonders requires raiding reserves or selling other assets. The second sub-portfolio contains underperforming assets expected to perform better with a change in conditions, which is not unreasonable to believe.

The following example illustrates the principle. Currently, there are many investment categories that are underperforming the “market” gains of 20% or more. Many investors owning US domiciled earnings have benefited due to the strength of the US dollar, largely due to relative political conditions. While I do not know how long this will last, I understand math and markets and know that extreme imbalances don’t last forever. Thus, in this example I am suggesting a significant portion of the second sub-portfolio be devoted to non-US centric holdings. As foreign securities can be administratively difficult, most of our non-US holdings are in funds, mostly but not all in SEC registered funds or fund management company stocks.

The following is a list of country or regional fund investment categories with average returns below the Lipper US Diversified Equity Funds average, in spite of unfavorable currency comparisons:

China             +19.58%
European Region   +18.65%
Japan             +18.31%
Pacific Region    +14.65%
Emerging Markets  +13.45%
Latin America     +13.25%

For those investing in legacy long-term oriented accounts may wish to consider Frontier Markets +8.63% or India Region +2.27%

WHAT SHOULD CONTRARIANS DO ABOUT BONDS?
If you own individual high-quality bonds with a maturity date that fits a detailed financial plan you are exposed to the risk of market forces. Contrarians are always worried when they see excess flows into any asset. Bonds have become too attractive for many investors, particularly those advised by former brokers, now classified as investment advisors.

I am told that interest rates around the world are at levels last seen 500 years ago. Many bonds and bond funds have risen to levels where they have market price risk at the valuations they are currently selling. The table below shows the average total return for various bond fund categories, year-to-date through last Thursday:

Corporate Bond-BBB              +12.53%  
Flexible Income                 +12.22%
Corporate Bond-A                +11.13%
High Yield                      +10.88%
Emerging Market Hard Currency   +10.38%
Global High Yield               +10.34%



Question: Do you have a contingency plan for a slump?     


Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/11/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings-all.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/11/where-are-we-and-so-weekly-blog-602.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/11/top-down-dictums-measured-digitally-are.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

An Awkward Moment with Frustration not Exhaustion - Weekly Blog # 591

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

An Awkward Moment with Frustration not Exhaustion

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Trying to develop a sound long-term investment strategy at any time is difficult, as most of the time we are clearly not at a top or bottom of a significant market move. We wander along an uncertain path to an eventual turning point, but each day, or in my case week, I must read the current sign posts to decide whether or not to change direction on the path I am traveling. Currently, there are three difficult choices to select from:

1. Stay reasonably fully invested in the upward sloping secular trend, accepting that there will be periodic cyclical movements.
2. As the opportunities and risks in today’s world are not the same as in the past. We should become increasingly defensive by building meaningful cash reserves.
3. Prepare for global policy mistakes that causes devastation.

I put the chances of being correct for each of these choices at 65%, 30% and 5%, respectively. On an overall basis I would improve my odds by sub-dividing the portfolio into timespan segments and periodically re-weight the commitments to the segments based on both perceived future conditions and the changing needs of the beneficiaries.

These three working conclusions are based on the following inputs:

Secular Continuation with Bouts of Cyclicality

• Most of the current volume is being generated by those that have a short-term time horizon. They are being whip-sawed by politically oriented news which is generating a lot of frustration. However, it is not generating the quantity of transactions representative of final exhaustion, or a complete retreat from participation.
• Nevertheless, traders are making decisions based on liquidity e.g. compare the ratios of advances to declines on the NASDAQ 211/314 vs. NYSE 411/229. (In general stocks on the NYSE trade in greater volume than on the NASDAQ) 
• Net flows into and out of ETFs shows short-term withdrawals this week. The two largest withdrawals totaled $4.6 Billion and the two largest net purchases totaled $1.2 Billion. The S&P 500 and MSCI Emerging Markets were sold and Consumer Staples and Gold were bought. 
• Even after Friday’s drop of 3% for the NASDAQ it is till up +16.63%, whereas the DJIA is up only +9.87%. Both gains will probably be larger than the total earnings gains for 2019, suggesting the market is looking for a good 2020.

Game Changers

• Lower interest rates and less binding loan covenants are likely to cause more bad loans.
• Only 42% of weekly prices are rising. Could we have deflation in goods and inflation in services and imported goods?
• Last week the interest rate offered to depositors went from 0.65% to 0.73%, suggesting that banks are increasing lending in face of slowing demand for products and services.

Global Mistakes

• The battle for dominance is essentially driven by defensive needs, not land or market dominance.
• The Chinese have been thinking in these terms for more than a thousand years. The earliest example of their well-developed thinking is in the writings of Sun Tzu entitled “The Art of War”. Jessica Hagy has produced a book that visualizes Sun Tzu’s thoughts. These should be understood by other world leaders and are shown below:
• Hold out baits to entice the enemy
• Feign disorder and crush them
• If your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him.
• If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.
• If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them.
• Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.
• These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand.
• The general who wins battles makes many calculations before a battle is fought.
• The general who loses a battle make but few calculations before-hand.

The Asia Times has an article entitled “China now has edge in Indio-Pacific”. It is based on a think tank report from an Australian group named United States Studies Centre. The study raises the question “Could the era of US military primacy in the Pacific be over? Their view is that internal conditions within the US suggests that it will not fully fund the needs of its National Defense Strategy. At the same time China is building a capability which in a surprise attack would destroy or cripple some or all of the US’s Western Pacific main installations in Guam and Japan. (Interesting that the report did not name our forces on Iwo Jima and in the Indian Ocean.)

My Point of View
As a former electronics, aerospace, broadcasting and conglomerates analyst, I have seen the power of small electronic components change massive companies and markets. The current “trade war” was designed to protect the primacy of our semiconductor technology, which is critical to both US and Chinese defense efforts. To paraphrase Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan’s statement of Who controls the Seas, controls the world. I believe the two Emperors of China and the US are acting as Who controls (leads) semiconductors and related technology controls the defense of their countries.

An Important Question
Considering how long value focused managers have suffered, can we build portfolios that are able to survive a similar period, regardless of our investment strategy? Any thoughts?



Did you miss my past few blogs? Click one of the links below to read.
https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/08/short-term-recognitions-plus-longer.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/08/sentiments-approaching-reversal-points.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2019/08/is-last-week-significant-weekly-blog-588.html



Did someone forward you this blog?
To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2019
A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.