We Allow Our Investment Professionals to be Lazy - Weekly Blog # 776

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

We Allow Our Investment Professionals to be Lazy

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

  

 

 

The Indictment

Short-term investors are often confused with speculators. While they may produce the most trades, long-term investors own the most securities. This is why the financial media is jammed with views of short-term consequences, e.g., the next announced move and statement of the Fed.

 

Whatever the Fed does, the impact on long-term assets will be minimal at best. The key numbers for long-term investors in declining order of importance are:

1. The purchasing power in local currency at the planned terminal date.
2. An discounted valuation caused by a premature sale.
3. Third is the aggregate value of distributed income while the asset is held. This could conceivably be larger than the first case on very long-held assets in a generational transfer.

Most pundits would rather pontificate about near-term prices than speculate on the three long-term numbers which are difficult to guess and won’t be known until many years in the future. These very long-term guesses are however what owners need in selecting the current assets that should be owned. While it is almost impossible to determine the exact future valuation, it is possible to come up with relative value ranges. In many long-term portfolios there are bonds and other securities with contract relationships. What is far from certain is the price and value of these instruments.

 

Historically, possibly bigger but more uncertain returns are earned from risker equity investments than from more predictable bond-like instruments. Bonds are also characteristically less volatile, but can only possibly recover their face value plus interest.

 

Nevertheless, the lure of higher potential returns attracts investors to equities and with it higher compensation for the advisors involved. This is the ballpark I choose to play in. To do so I take the inherent risk of attempting to make reasonably accurate projections regarding the relative performance of various equities and equity funds.

 

The Playing Field

As most of our clients are US dollar-based investors my primary interest is in US activities and how non-US actions impact US beneficiaries. The following is a list of primary concerns I have about the future of the US from an investment perspective. These current conditions are rarely discussed by the popular pundits.

1. Productivity is declining, which means the US is producing less sales and profits for each dollar of investment or hours of work. Productivity translates into long-term price gains in the marketplace. In last week’s blog I noted that the S&P 500 Index had gained an annualized return of over 10% since 1871. Prior to Covid the S&P 500 rose 9% per annum. We are growing even less this year. Depending on which prediction you choose, the expected gain is between slightly above zero and 7%. My guess is that “social spending” by industry and government has cost us at least one percent. The FTC, reshoring, and energy policies are likely costing at least another 1%.
2. We have lost the drive to win a war and the related peace after our conflict in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Our military now has a social mission, not primarily a military mission. To win we must want to win. Our current military is underfunded and not structured to win.
3. Excluding immigrants, we like China, are not growing our native-born population. This is not going to help improve productivity. Before 2050 India will have the largest population and by the turn of the century, Nigeria and possibly another African country will likely be the leader.
4. We are likely to see a new generation of global political leaders, possibly with more authoritarian tendencies. US industrial and commercial leaders will also change.
5. US schools are producing a generation of students who do not want to work hard and effectively. Our leading STEM oriented universities will produce good managers for a while, although some of the best will leave. That is too bad. Note the number of top leaders who are foreign born or first-generation Americans. We shouldn’t lose these leaders, we need them to replace some of the current politically adept CEOs.
6. China is likely to remain the fulcrum of world growth, they work harder and smarter.
7. From an investment standpoint, private companies are growing faster than public companies due to leverage and incentives. Incentives eventually lead to these companies becoming publicly owned, which requires public markets to not be overly burdened by government policies.

 

Restructuring How We Do Things

(The following is just one example of what may occur)

Our medical/insurance complexes have become gigantic bureaucratic political bodies, where patients are cogs in a machine. For instance, a patient living in the UK who has been in remission for over 2 ½ years is likely expected to return to the East coast to see his doctor every six months. Why can’t he go to a UK medical location and electronically tie in with a US facility. If these types of arrangements can’t be worked out, the real estate implications are enormous.

 

These are the types of changes we are looking to invest in.

 

Brief Initial Thoughts on Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse

Both were victims of their own business mismanagement, poorly informed clients, and poor government/industry regulation. I wonder in the long run if our society is better off letting them fail rather than partially bailing people out. I don’t know if the victims learn anything. More importantly, do investors in general learn to be more careful. I am most concerned by the last group.     

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Can’t Find Totally Risk-less Conditions - Weekly Blog #775

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data Performance/Easy.Interpretation/Not - Weekly Blog # 774

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: “This was the Worst Week of the Year” - Weekly Blog # 773

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

 

Can’t Find Totally Risk-less Conditions - Weekly Blog #775

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Can’t Find Totally Risk-less Conditions

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

  

 

 

A Real-World Problem for Investors

Investors turn to advisors to get assurances that they are not taking risks with their money and their future. We can discuss the numerous risks of losing some or all of their money and should do so. But the news of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) being forced to close and then taken over by the FDIC shows that these types of discussions were not had.

 

This weekend I spent considerable time thinking about “risklessness” and concluded that it does not absolutely exist, nor can there be such an asset in an absolute sense. There are known and unknown opportunities to lose all or some value of an asset.

 

The reason is that we do not live in a one-dimensional world where all is known, or unknown conditions exist. We and our assets exist in multiple dimensions. Few if any of the investors who sold securities in an IPO and deposited the cash proceeds in SVB were waiting for an opportunity to buy appropriate assets. I suspect most investors felt their cash was being held at one or more underwriters for a short period, not at a corporate depository.

 

If they considered it at all, they were pleased that their assets in the company were unencumbered by loans. My guess is that they never considered they were at risk of a “run on the bank” by unrelated depositors. But such a run happened, putting the bank in an insolvent condition, which led to bankruptcy.

 

Ecology

While it may come as a surprise, some investors were concerned about changing climate conditions many years ago. They felt it was not being appropriately considered by institutional investors in making investment decisions. The “buzz” word at the time was ecology. Which meant that if something changed, more things could change.

 

Today’s investors should dust off the old studies on ecology. A current example might be a military battle in the Ukraine causing the price of flour to rise in Egypt, which in turn factors in the price of Mideast oil rising, which in turn impacts gasoline prices in middle America and consequently the prices of local homes in the Midwest.

 

The World View

Today, every consumer and investor is a globalist, whether he or she likes it or not. This impacts transaction prices for everything he or she does, including wages and taxes. Funds that invest in Europe are increasing in price as they attract flows from America, where prices of US dominated funds are going down, leading to a decline in purchasing power for the US dollar.

 

US Investors vs Washington Politicians

The current administration in Washington has proposed raising taxes while continuing to curtail domestic production of goods and services. This will add to inflation as the world continues to fund a major war. Similar to society turning its back on climate and ecology years ago, which resulted in today’s conditions. Our government is pro inflation through restraint of trade and raising prices.

 

Last Week: Another Warning ex SVB

While most of the financial headlines on Thursday and Friday were focused on the implications of SVB, there was worse long run news for American investors, consumers, and citizens. The Standard & Poor’s 500 declined -1.58% for the week ended Thursday, similar to its performance for many prior weeks. However, the depressing news was that China Regional Funds, the largest contributor to world growth, had declined -6.31%. While China exports more than its imports, the major exporter to China is the US. If the US is going to get out of its near recessionary condition, it will need to export a lot of US products and services.

 

What Are We Looking For?

Last week there was significant weakening of market conditions. While paying close attention to present conditions, we are nevertheless searching for the stocks and managers that will participate and, in some cases, lead the next significant “bull” market. We are in the early stages of our search and it’s still conceivable we may go through a longer period of stagnation. We are searching for the kind of corporate leadership and product/services that demonstrate superiority. Some may be overseas, but many will come from the US. Please help us.    

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Data Performance/Easy.Interpretation/Not - Weekly Blog # 774

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: “This was the Worst Week of the Year” - Weekly Blog # 773

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: A Terrible Week - Weekly Blog # 772

 

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.