Investment Markets are Fragmenting - Weekly Blog # 839

 

         

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Investment Markets are Fragmenting

Flows Going to Potentially Higher Risk

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

   

       

   

Why the Fragmentation?

The answer is simple, salespeople make money by getting investors to make investment choices. At the institutional level commissions have totally disappeared, and the same largely applies at the retail level too. However, “vigorish” is alive and well, just with different names for spreads, underwriting fees, and management fees. Passive clients may decide at some future point that management fees are not worth it.

 

A valuable client is one that is actively investing and directly or indirectly aiding in getting new active clients.  The value of a client occurs either through the flow of new money or the reallocation of the portfolio. The marketing agent is consequently a bit of a worrier when communicating with clients. Furthermore, there is a desire to introduce new investment ideas, particularly new types of securities or new investment markets. The marketer will often present him or herself, or their firm, as more knowledgeable than the client. Thus, the marketer can dominate the client more than they expect.

 

Performing Better with More Risk

What follows is a brief discussion of current possible ploys that might be suggested. In truth these ideas might be sound if executed when not so popular. If peers already hold positions in the new play, their length of time to the eventual peak and subsequent major decline is shorter.

 

There are a very limited number of investors who have trading skills, and that does not include me. Most successful investors hold a relatively small number of holdings for many years. These are the types of investors who own Berkshire Hathaway with the goal of transferring assets to heirs after they are gone. (I am one.)

 

Until perhaps this week, James Mackintosh a Wall Street Journal columnist, noted that “Four giant tech stocks added more market value than all other stocks in the S&P 500 for the last month.” I suspect many investors were enticed to buy those four stocks. Unfortunately for them, the only class of stocks to rise for the week ended Thursday were small caps. regardless of growth, core, or value orientation.

 

Many individual and institutional investors have portfolios consisting of stocks listed on the NYSE, usually with dividends. These investors might be enticed to invest in NASDAQ listed stocks due to the greater number of tech stocks. There is a belief that most short-term NASDAQ traders are better than those playing on the big board. In the latest week only 23% of NYSE volume fell, compared to 42% on NASDAQ.

 

The fastest growing asset class today is Private Investments, either individually or through funds. As is often the case, the biggest risk is not the issuer, but other holders. The sponsors of private debt and equity do not have an obligation to buy back securities, except at the terminal date. The secondary market is very limited, and prices favor professional dealers.

 

Jaime Dimon, CEO and Chair of JP Morgan Chase is worried about inevitable investment mistakes in the privates. Although he does not see a structural problem, I think there potentially is one for two reasons.

1. These securities are being sold to individual investors. When the public loses money, they often complain to the media and members of congress who are always pro regulation.
2. There are very few pension funds still operating. Many have promised fixed returns to government employees, which includes teachers. For years these plans have used interest rates much lower than current rates, many of which have been bought from insurance companies. I believe some insurance companies will go bankrupt if interest rates stay at current levels or go higher, with the retirement burden falling on taxpayers. Politicians are probably better at getting the feds to change regulations. A guaranteed payment funded by a variable (market) sensitive vehicle is dangerous.

 

What are Your Thoughts?

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

 

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Rhyme Curse -Weekly Blog # 838

Mike Lipper's Blog: The Most Dangerous Message - Weekly Blog # 837

Mike Lipper's Blog: Trade, Invest, and/or Sell - Weekly Blog # 836

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2023

Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Faulty Comparisons - Weekly Blog # 682

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Faulty Comparisons

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

                          

Judgement Traps

When asked how his wife was an old comic replied, compared to whom? While that generated a laugh, it highlighted that some important considerations are not well decided by quick comparisons. Unfortunately, far too many investment decisions are made largely by comparison, with extreme performance judged to be better. 

As someone who has largely devoted his career to making and using statistical comparisons, I am the first to suggest that historical comparisons are not good “divining rods” for making investment decisions. When dealing with the public the SEC requires that a warning be included indicating past performance is not indicative of future results. Unfortunately, this warning is not attached to all comparisons. For example, size, yield, book value, return on asset, equity, sales, operating earnings etc. All that these measures tell us is what happened, not why they happened or even the conditions that may have contributed to the results.

The main reasons there are betting favorites at the racetrack, political campaigns and possibly at the entertainment awards, is that there is a belief that the “smart money” knows something and therefore is worth following. I was recently in contact with some very bright student investors who used a lot of statistical measures to make investment decisions. One of their newer tools was the size of mutual fund holdings and possibly transactions in a stock. I felt this was an oversimplification in their search for the “smart money”. I suggested they separate the fund universe into three buckets:

1. Passive/index funds
2. Funds with net inflows
3. Funds with net outflows

I would totally disregard the passive funds because they are not making considered judgements on individual securities. They should pay only partial attention to funds growing through net inflows and pay particular attention to funds in net redemption. 

Portfolio managers of funds with net inflows generally use the money to either buy more of what they own or begin a position in a new name. If the new name attracts additional future dollars of inflows, that could be of interest. The job of the portfolio manager experiencing net redemptions is quite different. He/she may love all their holdings but must still raise cash. Consequently, it is likely securities with the worst near term prospects will be sold. That could be the most interesting factoid of the exercise. For further insights, I have found it worth following specific funds, particularly when they invest in a new name. (This is exactly the type of SEC warning that would be appropriate, past performance does not predict future results.)

Part of the fallacy of comparisons is a misperception of the appropriateness of the index used to compare a particular stock, fund, or investor. Currently, the largest number of investment accounts hold 10 to 30 stocks and have less than $5 million invested. In these cases, performance comparisons with the major indices are inappropriate. Indices, in terms of the number of securities, represent a small percentage of the number of available securities. Additionally, unlike mutual funds, most stock accounts do not face daily liquidity needs. Most pension funds have limited need to make unplanned sales, thus liquidity is not paramount in their decision process also.

As a young junior security analyst, I thought comparing a steel company in Chicago with those in Pennsylvania was not useful. The Chicago producer mainly sold to nearby customers and had a transportation cost advantage, which they used to get higher prices. Similarly, the degree of internal production of critical auto parts was a major differentiation between auto companies. Thus, I at an early questioner of comparisons without adjustments. 

Applying Comparisons to Future Market Direction

As is often the case, intelligent analysts and portfolio managers see the US stock market going in one of three directions:

1. A major economic expansion
2. At half time in a continuing bull market
3. At a pause before a market storm

In each case, their primary argument is based on a comparison with an indicator. I have listed their views and indicators below, allowing subscribers to make up their own mind.

“Mother of All Recoveries”

This is an economic forecast based largely on a combination of government stimulus and recovery from the lockdown.

Half Time

“Half Time” in a long-term bull market trend, with an occasional correction and a change in market leadership, supported by market analysis.

A Rounding Top that Could Lead to a Bear Market

Through Thursday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) -1.64% and the S&P 500 -1.81% are down from their peaks on May 7th. The NASDAQ is down -4.77% from its peak on April 26th. While the first quarter was quite positive, it is possible the second quarter will be flat to down, with earnings per share gaining the most in the second quarter this year. In the latest week, Precious Metals Funds were up +7.16%, with 118 new lows on NYSE and 230 new lows on the NASDAQ. In the week tax payments were due, Money Market Funds attracted $25.2 Billion.

What Are the Odds of a Top in the Next Six Months?

Mother of All Recoveries   25%

Half Time                  35%

Rounding-Top               40%

Based on these projections, I would prepare to trade portions of the account and be prepared to raise 50% in cash. For accounts with a five-year time horizon, a cash holding of 20% to be redeployed once the market has moved beyond a 10% decline, makes sense. For accounts looking beyond five years, no additional cash is suggested.

Please share what you think?

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/05/extreme-views-can-be-good-lessons.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/05/where-is-stock-market-going-next-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2021/05/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved.

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.