The Inevitable Recession - Weekly Blog # 914

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

The Inevitable Recession

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Loses Are Needed

Securities analysts, portfolio managers, investors, politicians, and others, need the fear and reality of recessions. Both written and geological history record meaningful and painful declines. Since they happen with some regularity there must be a repetitive set of reasons, with the lure of a gain sucking us into overexpansion and other error-making decisions.

 

Humans evolved from hunters and/or gathers, who periodically generated supplies beyond their immediate need, beyond a limited reserve for emergencies. When they gathered too much, costs grew and quality suffered. In the financial world we hoard and or borrow too much in the way of financial assets. This became increasingly clear as conditions changed.

 

These adverse conditions are clear in recorded history, in Babylon, China, and other places. Thus, the history of weather, business, and political cycles were written, becoming critical drivers of financial markets.

 

The Rise of Financial Analysis

Trading markets began soon after communities were established. Over time, it became clear that some successful traders achieved periodic, large returns on their use of trading capital. A number of these people gained reputations as good traders and found other people who recognized they did not have the same skills, contacts, and capital. These traders could borrow money at attractive rates and could charge fees to manage portfolios for selected outsiders. A number of these traders evolved into investment banks, who had both skilled traders and statisticians, some of whom became analysts.

 

US and UK Governments vs. Fraud

When markets fall, investors don't blame themselves for the losses they sustain. They claim fraud on the part of the "system", which includes issuers, exchanges, underwriters, and salespeople. Generally, the public investor does not understand business and financial cycles or chooses to forget the warnings that were given before they placed purchase orders. To protect the "public", disclosure and other laws were passed. While no law or regulation can prevent bad judgement, disclosures can ensure investors receive what is required to be transmitted to them. Unfortunately, accounting and legal disclosures use terms that the public does not understand.

 

As a result of large losses sustained by US public investors in the 1930s, there were seven reform laws passed, including the Securities & Exchange Act and a similar set of regulations in the UK.

 

The Development of Securities Analysis

While there were numerous books written about investing prior to the 1929 crash, they were not read by many investors. In the early 1930s Benjamin Graham and David Dodd wrote a Securities Analysis textbook for a Columbia University course. (Ben was a portfolio manager and Dave Dodd was a professor, who was still teaching in the late 1950s when I took the course from him.) Their main lesson was how to think about investing in securities while minimizing losing money. The course was taught as a supplement to a number of accounting and business law courses. They largely used the reconstruction of financial statements to assist patient investors. (While useful in minimizing investment losses, creating language to allow people to understand the thinking of others and the politics of an industry or client would have been more valuable.)

 

Recession Analysis

I believe most of those in the market are assessing the probability of an oncoming recession by focusing on published economic data. The stock market is focused on the future, not the past, and in that way it’s ahead of the economics releases. For example, the election results of last Tuesday suggest Louis XIV’s building of Versailles, even though no one else is saying it. The King was always at war, usually with England, and ran up big debts. He destroyed the local power of the nobility and insisted they spend most of their time attending to him in the Palace. (Is the reaction to larger than expected Democratic margins of victory in New Jersey and Virginia and the destruction of part of the White House for a big ballroom similar to what Louis XIV set in motion before the French Revolution and Napolean?)

 

Other market indicators last week included decliners on both the NYSE and NASDAQ being larger than gainers, with the NASDAQ losing twice as much as the gainers. NASDAQ's volume over the last year increased 38.21% vs the NYSE volume gaining 22.98%. (One of the clues to identifying a peak and then a decline is a decline in "quality", which is better evidenced on the balance sheet than through earnings.)

 

On Friday, the best performing mutual fund categories in rank order were Currency funds, Precious Metals Funds, Real Estate Funds, Natural Resource Funds, and Materials Producers. All are not heavily held by funds and other institutional holders. On a year-to-date basis, the only fund categories that beat the S&P 500 Funds Index category were Science & Tech, Precious Metals, Global Science & Tech, and Large-Cap Growth. (There is considerable overlap in the names in their portfolios). Barron's weekly list of foreign market indices showed 5 Asian markets up, with only 1 rising in Europe.

 

Identifying the date when a recession begins is officially only determined after it ends. As a practical matter you might use the purchasing managers' index, which has been in contraction for the last 8 months and is now showing only 42.3% rising. While it is foolish- to name both a market direction and a date, it may be useful to be aware that the market generally rises at least 80% of the time. Considering the 5-year average length of time CEOs remain in their chair, it suggests a market decline once every five years, which somewhat parallels the 4-year length of a US President's term. (I don't know how to adjust the number for the current President but possibly averaging all Presidents it may be around five years.)

 

Working Conclusion:

The odds of a recession before the next Presidential election is probably 67%, with a depression at 50%. (The latter would require some mismanagement during the recession to raise the odds of a depression above 50%.)

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Biggest Investment Hurdle: Complexity - Weekly Blog # 913

Mike Lipper's Blog: Signals of Change in Historic Patterns - Weekly Blog # 912

Mike Lipper's Blog: Where Are US Stock Prices Going? - Weekly Blog # 911

 

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.