SPORTS FANS SELECT CABINET & OTHER PROBLEMS - Weekly Blog # 864

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

SPORTS FANS SELECT CABINET

&

OTHER PROBLEMS

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

Go to the Arenas

As we view many contests and competitions, it is clear to us the mistakes combatants are making. Apparently, the President elect is choosing his cabinet based on the following three characteristics:  

• Personal loyalty to Trump.
• Complaints about what the government does or does not do.
• No experience in running a large federal organization.

 

I remember from my sports days, both in secondary school and university competitions, various screams were heard about the details of the front-line games or the details of a move setting up some subsequent play. All we knew was that most of the players were inexperienced in their announced positions. They may have been fortunate in that many relied on what they were taught in school in those days. For example, they could have taught us that stock prices could approximate the value of a stock, or a sound reaction to an event.

 

Today, 80% of the volume of the S&P 500 is passive and 10 stocks make up 39% of its market-cap. One stock is bigger than every other national stock exchange, except Japan.

 

Bonds Speak Differently

High grade US Treasuries bond yields have risen 124 basis points in a year, sending their prices down. However, the prices of medium-grade bonds have been flat over the same period. This does not speak to the quality of US Treasuries but instead reflects the demand for them. Time value (the bond’s maturity) used to be a critical element of the bond market. Today, only 31 basis points of yield separates the 2-year bond from the 30-year bond. (This may suggest that due to low yields, very few of the current owners of 30-year bonds are expected to own them for a long time.)

 

Caution: Keep Data and Date Tied

The Saturday weekly Wall Street Journal roster of stock indexes, currencies, commodities, and ETFs showed gains for 74% of them. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) showed an increase in bearish readings, reducing the spread between bulls and bears to 8%, from 21.5% the prior week. This is a dramatic change. It could reflect a shift in the sample survey makeup. Alternatively, because the AAII survey was taken early in the week it reflected the views of the prior week. Overall, this week’s data was positive every day, suggesting “Black Friday” sales enticed customers for at least two weeks. That is my preferred guess.

 

What do you think?    

 

Happy Thanksgiving, particularly those and their families serving far from home.

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Reading the Future from History - Weekly Blog # 863

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk - Weekly Blog # 862

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Reading the Future from History - Weekly Blog # 863

 

 

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Reading the Future from History

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

History May Suggest:

1. The American People Won the Election
2. The Recession has started

 

The Declaration of Independence was signed on August 2nd, 1776, the US Constitution was passed in 1787, and the last state (Rhode Island) ratified it in 1790. Today, Rhode Island still remains the smallest state in the Union. Thus, since the beginning of our nation the rights of our smallest state have been critical to our progress. One of the many things making the US different than other republics is The Founding Fathers fear of the tyranny of the larger states on the smaller states. Consequently, our Electoral College favors state representation over population. In the 2024 election, even though President Trump polled more votes than Vice President Harris, the House is almost evenly split, but he won 36 states and lost only 14, mostly on the coasts or major rivers.

 

This split is one reason I suggested President Trump will likely have difficulty getting much legislation easily passed through both houses, where he only has a majority of about five votes. Of the 14 major issues, only two can be accomplished through just executive orders.

 

Actually, many if not most Americans are pleased with the results of the election. An incompetent government was dismissed before it became even more intrusive and has been replaced by a new administration with untried ideas. New legislation will be delayed by a disruptive Congress and a slow-walking Deep State. Many Americans would like it if the air conditioners in D.C. did not work, fulfilling Hamilton and Madison desire that government work be part-time.

 

Recession Coming?

As someone rowing in a boat with the wind picking up and clouds darkening, you become relatively certain it will soon rain. The question is, will you get to dry land before getting really wet?

 

Evidence of an economic storm on the horizon can be summed up as follows:

1. Stock analysts have been instructed for generations that high quality bonds are more sensitive to economic changes than stocks, at least initially. Currently, yields have been going up (prices down). However, mid-quality bond prices have barely moved at all, something overseas fixed income investors are very sensitive to.
2. Most US stock prices declined this week, with just 37.7% of the stocks on the NYSE rising and only 27.6% rising on the NASDAQ. NASDAQ stocks have performed better than those on the “Big Board” for some time and are cheaper on a market to book value basis. This suggests the NASDAQ investor is a more professional investor.
3. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) weekly sample survey of investors indicates the bullish or bearishness sentiment of their investors for the next six months. In the last three weeks, the bullish reading has risen to 49.8% from 39.5%, while the bearish reading only went down to 28.3% from 30.9%. Market analysts believe the “public” is often wrong at turning points. With that in mind, it is interesting that the bulls gained 10.3% while the bears dropped only 2.2%.
4. The weekend WSJ tracks some 72 prices of stock indices, commodities, ETFs, and currencies. This week only 12.5% were up, with Natural Gas up a leading 5.77%. The remaining gainers all rose by less than 2%. This likely indicates sophisticated investors are nervous about what lies ahead.

 

 

Thoughts?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk - Weekly Blog # 862

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

Mike Lipper's Blog: Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk - Weekly Blog # 862

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

Inflection Point: “Trump Trade” at Risk

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

When Traveling We Often Don’t Know We Are Lost

As a portfolio manager for multi-generational accounts, it is critical to continually focus on the long-term funding needs of accounts, particularly when I am no longer around. In effect we are on a long march, which was part of my training as a USMC officer. (Most of our subscribers will read this blog on the 249th Birthday of The Corps) Rarely does a long march go in a straight line and each turn could be a minor change in direction. Alternatively, it could be a significant change in direction to avoid future danger. At some point a good Marine will recognize that we have passed a critical inflection point.

 

Our fellow investment marchers should be aware of a meaningful change in direction, speed of travel, and a different set of tactical moves. As an officer, it is my duty to consider changes.

 

Recent chatter from various investment pundits suggests there are various “Trump Trades”. Without making a judgement on each suggestion, I am willing to bet a year from now at least half those trades will not have worked out.

 

These trades are based on the 45th President’s actions and campaign comments. I believe no one knows what the 47th President will be able to get accomplished in his first year. We may think we know what he wants to do, but the world has changed both domestically and internationally and he doesn’t know for sure. Based on history, I am concerned about how Congress will follow direction. In many ways, both Chambers of the two major parties are split internally.  Just look at the number of announced caucuses and the potential number of informal voting blocks. Republican majorities in both chambers are likely be under 10 members. Furthermore, the incoming President did not do much to get many members elected. There are a number of Senators who see themselves sitting in The Oval office after the 2028 elections.

 

My portfolio management suggestions for protecting portfolio manager’s jobs are the following:

1. Divide the Trump Trades in half and hold one half for the next year.
2. With the second half, subdivide into twelve equal groups and sell one group each month for the next year.
3. Put the freed-up cash in an equal-weighted S&P 500 index fund if you must be invested, otherwise put the cash in a money market fund.

The above tactic is for short exposure but does not address the real problem.

 

Lack of Competent Leadership is the Problem

As a society Americans have become defensive about their own worth and their jobs. We seek to acquire the credentials that qualified us at some point in time for a particular job, “guaranteeing” that job and income. Once we have the credentials, we no longer need to compete. The longer the elapsed time from when we “earned” the credentials, the less talents we acquire. To offset this deficiency, we lean more on support staff. During WWII it required eight support people for every fighting man (mostly men).

 

This is true not only in the military, but also in medicine, government and schooling. (Note, I didn’t say education.) The larger the staff, the more bureaucratic the control systems get. (A classic example is the Ukrainian fighting people vs the Russian Army.) In general, the more people involved the less efficient the group gets and the longer it takes between promotions.

 

Our so-called educational system (school and university) has molded our workforce since the 1920s. The Communist Party thought that if they could control New York and other school systems they could impact the government, aided by the Depression. The key for union teachers was protecting their jobs by teaching-to-pass exams, both for teachers and students. They were not taught how to think. This strategy was remarkably successful.

 

These teachers trained many of the senior teachers who trained the senior college and university students of today, which explains the political efforts of the majority of teachers today. Trustees and Deans don’t control most of the critical choices of their schools. The faculty senate are the main decision makers, run on a seniority basis.

 

These are the people who are teaching the leaders of today and tomorrow in government, medicine, and business. They tend to favor large organizations, despite most progress in society originating from smaller groups.

 

Inflation is not the Problem

Inflation is society’s way of dealing with imbalances between current supply and demand. Attempts by a top-down government to control the urges of people to balance supply and demand are not useful. Every attempt to control these forces has enlarged grey and black markets, often summoned in regulated and expensive markets. Most supply shortages are due to government regulation for the benefit of friends of the government.

 

In Conclusion

If we have entered a new cycle, we may see a very different set of trends that we will need to understand and master. Any thoughts on how to manage long-term portfolios?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

Mike Lipper's Blog: Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stress Unfelt by the “Bulls”, Yet !! - Weekly Blog # 859

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

 

This Was the Week That Was, But Not What Was Expected - Weekly Blog # 861

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

 

This Was The Week That Was,

But Not What Was Expected

 

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018

 

 

 

 “Trump Trade”, An Artifact of History

No one really knows which of the new administration’s critical rules and regulations will become law. Both presidential candidates have announced and unannounced wishes, but both are unlikely to get another term. They will have little ability to help various members of Congress win the ’26 or ’28 elections.

 

Unless there is a one-sided sweep of both Houses for the same party, the odds favor majorities in the single digits. While the rest of the world might think Congressional leaders will be able to command political discipline, both parties are split into multiple groups depending on the particular issue. Furthermore, in the Senate there are members who see themselves sitting in the White House after the ’28 elections.  Looking beyond the intramural games of the next four years, there are two elements of news that should be of importance to those of us selecting assets to meet the needs of longer-term investors.

 

The Declining Dollar

The CFA Institute Research & Policy Center conducted a global survey of 4000 CFAs concerning the future value of the US Dollar. The survey was conducted from 15 to 31 of July 2024. They published their findings in a white paper titled “The Dollar’s Exorbitant Privilege” (This is what the French President called the dollar years ago.)

 

A supermajority of respondents believe that US government spending is not sustainable. Only 59% of US Treasury investors believe the US can continue to borrow using Treasuries. (I remember there was a time when we created a special class of Treasuries for the Saudi Arabia, with an undisclosed interest rate). Neither of the two Presidential Candidates have announced any plans to reduce the deficit and both are unannounced pro-inflation. The respondents expect the dollar to be replaced by a multipolar currency system no later than fifteen years from now.

 

Some investors already recognize the risk in the dollar. Bank of America’s brokerage firm noted this week that 31% of their volume was in gold and 24% in crypto, as a way to reduce total dependence on the dollar. One long-term investor diversifying his currency risk is Warren Buffett. After doubling his money in five Japanese Trading companies, he is now borrowing money in Yen.

 

Berkshire Hathaway’s 10Q

As a young analyst I became enamored by their financial statements, long before I could afford to buy shares in Berkshire. In the 1960s I felt a smart business school could devote a whole semester to reading and understanding the financial reports of Berkshire. It would teach students about equity investments, bonds, insurance, commodities, management analysis, and how politics impacts investment decisions. (It might even help the professors learn about the real world)

 

On Saturday Berkshire published its third quarter results with a relatively concise press release, which was top-line oriented. As is required by the SEC it also published its 10Q document, which was over fifty pages long. Ten of those pages were full of brief comments on each of the larger investments. This is what hooked me, although I could not purchase most of their investments because they are not publicly traded. Their comments were in some detail, covering sales, earnings, taxes paid, expense trends, and management issues. The comments gave me an understanding of how the real economy is working. (Along the way I was able to become comfortable enough to buy some shares in Berkshire, and it is now my biggest investment.)

 

The latest “Q” showed that in nine months they had raised their cash levels to $288 billion, compared to $130 billion at year-end.  At the same time, they added $50 billion to investments. Perhaps most significant was that they did not repurchase any of their own publicly traded stock. A couple of years ago at a private dinner with the late and great Charley Munger, I asked him if I should value their private companies at twice their carrying value (purchase price + dividends received). Charley counseled me that everything they owned currently was not a good investment. As usual he was correct. In this quarter’s “Q” there were a significant number of investments that declining earnings or lost money. (I still believe they own enough large winners on average where doubling their holdings value would be reasonable.) If one looks at the operations of a number of industrial and consumer product entities, they themselves conduct substantial financial activities in terms of loans and insurance.

 

Is Warren Buffett’s Caution Warranted?

Some stocks have risen so high that they may have brought some gains forward, potentially reducing future gains. One way to evaluate this is to look at the gains achieved by the leading mutual fund sectors: Total Return Performance for the latest 52 weeks are shown below:

 

Equity Leverage       61.16%

Financial Services    46.38%

Science & Tech        44.13%

Mid-Cap Growth        41.28%

Large-Cap Growth      40.30%

 

I don’t expect all to be leaders in the next 52 weeks, as the three main indices (DJIA, SPX, and the Nasdaq Composite) have “Head & Shoulders” chart patterns, which often leads to a reversal.

 

Question: What Do You Think?

 

 

 

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

Mike Lipper's Blog: Both Elections & Investments Seldom What They Seem - Weekly Blog # 860

Mike Lipper's Blog: Stress Unfelt by the “Bulls”, Yet !! - Weekly Blog # 859

Mike Lipper's Blog: Melt-Up, Leaks, & Echoes of 1907 - Weekly Blog # 858

 

Did someone forward you this blog?

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

 

Copyright © 2008 – 2024

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

 

All rights reserved.

 

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.