Caution Ahead: Emotional Turns Likely - Elections and Coronavirus - Weekly Blog # 644

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Caution Ahead:

Emotional Turns Likely-Elections and Coronavirus

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

When the battlefield is quiet, expect to be attacked, is a lesson from the US Marine Corps. For bullish equity investors the low volume of August trading should signal a need to expect change. The most dangerous short-term change is one spurred on by emotions, rapidly bringing into action holders of excess cash or large equity holdings.

The calendar provides two events that could quickly galvanize emotional responses, the forthcoming US election and reports of successful vaccines/therapeutic COVID-19 treatments. Both could mobilize a large amount of almost instant trading from thrilled and disappointed investors. Based on a lifelong study of turning points, I suggest caution on the part of investors who believe in rusty or non-existent trading skills. Furthermore, very soon after the announcement a counter trend could appear, reducing the size of the initial pop and in some cases completely reversing it. As more information becomes available, the implications of the announced event will often become clearer. Even if further information reinforces the initial announcement, the length of time varies before complete utilization becomes evident. Thus, investors will have time to calmly adjust their holdings. 

Profitable courses of action build on some factors present before the headline event, while others will have little to no future impact. Some will advise you of the critical present factors supporting the future event, I am not so privileged. All I can do is briefly list some of the factors that might support the trends post the announcement, including the subsequent reversal moves:

• The biggest investment news of the week was the changing of the components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and the reweighting of Apple*. The current producer of this most senior of US stock indices is S&P Indices, owned by Standard & Poor’s, who consults with some of the editors of The Wall Street Journal when making changes. On Monday they will delete Exxon Mobil, Pfizer, and Raytheon Technology, adding Sales Force, AMGEN, and Honeywell. In addition, on the same day the weight of Apple in the index will be reduced due to Apple’s four for one stock split. It will be replaced as the company with the heaviest weight in the index by United Health.

Because of the dominance of Dow Jones through its wires and publications, most investors tend to believe that the DJIA measures the US stock market. That a thirty-stock market price weighted index is “the market” with its’ 30 stocks and not the S&P 500, the Russell 3000 or the Wilshire, with its original 5000 stocks, shows the power of the media. Clearly, global indices have even more components. Nevertheless, the DJIA has done a reasonable job of tracking high-priced US stocks. Part of its success is due to dropping components when their outlook appears to be slowing. (Some components comeback into the index after a large merger.)

While most market followers will continue to use the DJIA as a market measure, I will not for the next twelve months. While statisticians will link the new components and the reduced weight of Apple, I believe they have created a new measure. After one year I will see the level of correlation with the S&P 500 and if the gap is close, I will return to using it as a measure. Once again, the editors may have done a good job of changing the components to represent our economy. Over the more than one hundred years of its existence, they have done a good job of switching the emphasis from consumer products, to industrials, to tech and then to high-tech.

(*) Owned in personal accounts

• Record high prices achieved this week for both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite confirms the view that the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sample survey of market direction for the next six months is a contrarian  indicator. For the first time in many weeks the leading bearish prediction fell below an extreme reading of 40%. 
• 79% of the WSJ’s weekly prices rose. This may reflect some shortages, but it also reflects merchants trying to increase prices to make up for forgone profits. Despite many learned economists being quite sanguine on inflation, I expect the Fed to get and exceed its desired 2% inflation target.
• Unfortunately, I expect layoffs will rise for a while. The Russell 2000’s second quarter estimated revenues dropped -19%, with earnings dropping -99.1 %. This indicates to me that smaller companies have kept their staffs to preserve their hard to get employees. So far, third quarter revenues have not risen much. There is a good chance that instead of preserving the work force the focus will shift to preserving the firm. I suspect private firm closings indicate a similar trend.
• The bond market is moving contrary to the stock market. Of thirty-one fixed income mutual funds investment objectives, only twelve gained for the week and they were equity tinged high-yield or pro inflation vehicles. The maturity yield curve tightened, with maturities of more than two years rising.
• There may be more longevity to the current market than appears. Typically, markets don’t peak until they exhaust all available cash and there is a lot of cash on the sidelines today. In addition, there is a lot of capacity to increase margin borrowing.  Remember, margin can be used to support short sales, as well as the more popular long purchases.

Working Conclusions:

• Trading oriented accounts should be prepared to make lots of small moves and be willing to reverse direction when appropriate.
• Capital appreciation accounts should look for bargains by being contrary.
• Capital preservation accounts need to recast their portfolio in one or more other currencies to determine their risk of only evaluating their accounts in dollars. European investments may look attractive for “value” oriented accounts and Asian investments could be attractive for long-term growth investors. Multi-generational investors should develop an understanding of the long-term outlook for selected investments in Africa and the Middle East.

Share your reactions and thoughts with us. 

     

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings_23.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/rotating-leadership-likely-on-horizon.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

The Week’s Fashions and Our Most Dangerous Asset - Weekly Blog # 643

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

The Week’s Fashions and Our Most Dangerous Asset

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

There are instances where very current observations can have long-term implications. The week that ended last Thursday night was quite possibly such an instance. Each week I examine a report on the performance of over one hundred different investment objective peer groups. Since the competitive game, not the investment game, is beating “the market”, I look at what types of funds that have beaten the S&P 500 Index Funds average performance. In the quiet lazy summer week, the index gained +0.40%. The following is a list of the seventeen peer groups that beat the index:

Base Metals Commodities   +2.83%

Precious Metals           +2.43%          

Energy Fund Commodities   +2.11%         

Large-Cap Growth          +1.83%         

Science & Technology      +1.60%         

Global Science & Tech     +1.58%          

Multi-Cap Growth          +1.52%         

Convertible Securities    +1.37%        

Consumer Services         +1.25% 

General Commodities       +1.13%

Agricultural Commodities  +0.78%

China Region              +0.77%

Global Large-Cap Growth   +0.77%

Global Multi-Cap Growth   +0.70%

India Region              +0.61%

Alt. Active Extension     +0.49%

Telecommunications        +0.45%

Most of these leading groups have been leading for some time, benefitting from momentum. The commodity owning funds look forward to higher prices for them and inflation for their customers resulting from shortages of supply.

One could say that these groups were deemed attractive by some pundits and their followers. Thus, if one would invest in most of these, the bet is not on the fundamentals of the underlying companies and commodities, but on the expected pronouncements of various pundits. To me, this suggests that these funds are likely to be more volatile than most funds. Thus, they make sense for those who believe in their trading skills or have a firmly held view of the investment cycles of the future.

CASH Is the Most Dangerous Asset in the Portfolio

Cash is a dangerous asset, not because it may lose some value, but because of how we exit from it. Remember, almost without exception every single loser we have had started from exiting cash. Potentially, the biggest problem in having cash is the way we think about it, our portfolio, and ourselves.

Whether we have a thousand, ten thousand, one hundred thousand, a million, ten million, one hundred million, one billion, or ten billion, as we jump each successive hurdle it gives to us a different attitude about ourselves, our status among others, and the safety of our situation. However, these emotional and intellectual highs can be very misleading. 

Cash is a receipt from past activities and its value changes imperceptivity every day due to the interaction of currency and inflation. Additionally, changes in tax regulation and investment/legal practices change the purchasing power of cash. Another critical element impacting how we feel about cash and other attributes of wealth is the perceived wealth of others, either foolishly published or gossiped. (The wealthy lists are not adjusted for present debts or future commitments. Some multi-millionaires have assets tied up and have little or no “walking around money”.)

The expected use of cash defines the flexibility of wealth. Large families in terms of number or generation of people need to think about the state of their physical, emotional, and mental health when considering future spending. Only some family members and their highly trusted advisors have a real understanding of the extent of cash and other indications of wealth. Often, no one has a complete picture of the emotions attached to assets/liabilities and how that influences their disposition.

Working Toward Solution Suggestions

The best suggestion I have is to adopt a holding company philosophy like Berkshire Hathaway, which is a holding of some clients and held in personal accounts. With over 60 operating entities and over 100 separate financial centers, their current operations retain enough of their cashflows to meet current needs and send the excess to headquarters for future investments.

The first suggestion deals with the proper identification of reserves to meet specific needs. It can include specific elements such as buying future residential property, education expenses, specific medical needs, and a loss of employment reserves. Determining the size of the specific reserve will at best be guesswork, but some numbers are better than none. A much more difficult task is guessing the range of future dates when the reserves will be tapped. It is at this point that an intelligent allocation of cash and risk/return assets should be made. The closer the likely expenditures, the higher the allocation of cash or extremely high-quality short-term paper. However, there are risks associated with funding long term needs with short-term paper and cash. My own view would be the following reverse ladder:

• 100% cash for assets to be spent in the next 90 days
• 80% cash for assets to be spent one year in the future
• 60% cash for assets to be spent two years in the future 
• 50% and no higher in cash beyond that 

My second suggestion is to divide one’s portfolio into two separate parts, the reserve element just mentioned and an investment portfolio with at least a ten-year view, potentially extending beyond multiple generations.

The investment portfolio should avoid holding cash except for a tactical reserve, with a time lock forcing some commitment if the tactical reserve remains after 18 months. Remember the following things:

• In an investment portfolio cash is a decaying asset due to inflation and currency. 
• If you must reduce or eliminate cash, the investment opportunities are vast and include some relatively safe alternatives. 
• Long-term successful investors often go through periods where they are very lonely.     

 

Questions of the week: 

1. Do you monitor the opportunities to invest investment cash?
2. Do you review your reserves periodically to ensure that they are appropriate? 
3. What was the last time you adjusted your cash levels and what was the result? 

    

   

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/rotating-leadership-likely-on-horizon.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/more-to-learn-by-seeing-more-weekly.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2020

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Changing Investment Directions-Different Views - Weekly Blog # 642

 

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Changing Investment Directions-Different Views

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

August Calls

Market analysts have frequently identified August as a month of change in market direction. During a period of normally low volume, a little extra volume in the face of vacations can have a disproportionate impact. In addition, August usually firms up detailed plans for the highest grossing 4th quarter, while preliminary plans for the next calendar year are being finalized prior to final approval. (But we are not living under normal conditions. Thus, I believe it would be wise to adopt a “fan approach” to planning, with at least a high, low and middle ground, to prepare for the probability that there will be rapid changes that require action.)

Because of my professional life experience I start each analysis looking through the mutual fund industry data, which is often a useful clue to both markets and the broader economy. For the week that ended last Thursday night, “Value Funds” gained +2.25% on a weighted average basis. This compares with a tiny loss of -0.02% for the similarly weighted average for “Growth Funds”. Most often the investment trends that occur within the US market also occur in the international markets and this week it was true for both the international funds registered with the SEC and the “offshore” funds we track. Nine value funds were in the 25-best performing mutual funds for the week. Also on that list were five financial sector funds. Overall, financial sector funds gained +3.08%, with industrial sector funds doing slightly better +3.10%. The prior leading sector groupings declined, Science & Technology -1.56% and Global Science & Tech -1.45%. 

While a few weeks of performance does not guaranty a longer-term trend, all longer trends start with a few observations. The stock price moves of value vs. growth are way ahead of changes in the direction of earnings, although they are in parallel with many views expressed by politicians around the world.

China Pulling Ahead

Despite the rising level of tensions between the US and China, it appears on the surface that the trends within China are improving. One of the ways I follow what is happening in China is by reading the research provided by the fund management group, Matthews Asia. The following brief points were derived from their research.

• There were no COVID deaths in China in the first 12 days of August.
• Auto sales are improving on a broad scale in China, particularly for foreign brands. In July, Toyota increased +19.1 % (including Lexus +38.6%), Honda +19.1%, Nissan +11.6%. General Motors sold more cars in China than in the US.
• Last year, 60% of China’s GDP growth came from internal consumption, with only 17% of GDP being gross exports and only 17% of that going to the US. While the US and most of the rest of the world have problems with the policies and activities of the Chinese, we cannot realistically isolate them. We need to come to some accommodation with them for us all to grow.

The “Sage of Omaha” Throws Curves

Warren Buffett for many years threw out the first pitch for the local baseball team. In the second quarter of 2020 he threw a curve ball to investors with his second quarter transactions. Even if our clients or personal accounts did not own shares in Berkshire Hathaway, we would still study the company’s financials and/or pronouncements. I have suggested that a well-constructed financial and business graduate course could be conducted using only their documents. Their successes are legendary, but their few errors are even more valuable as teaching moments. Last week they published their 10-Q report and their second quarter publicly traded securities portfolio with the SEC. Each is worthy of detailed study.

The 10-Q reveals that the company should not be compared to either an open-end or closed-end fund, as it is intelligently leveraged with borrowed money in the form of debt and potential future payments, using customer float and future tax payments. Offsetting the leverage are large amounts of short-term US Treasury bills and other high-quality fixed income/cash holdings. The company is an investment portfolio of publicly traded and private equity holdings that utilize excess earnings for operational needs to buy new investments. It does not currently pay cash dividends, as shareholders benefit from the increase in value of their holdings. Recently, they have become a relatively small buyer of their own stock. Unlike many corporate CEOs and Portfolio Managers, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger’s time horizon is that of their shareholders’ heirs. Thus, any large- scale disposal of assets comes as a surprise.

The publication of their report to the SEC of their publicly traded securities transactions in the second quarter was a surprise. In summary, they materially reduced their holdings in most bank stocks, although the report did not provide an explanation as to why. Earlier in the year they did provide an explanation as to why they sold out of all their airline stocks. They felt that it would be a period of years, not months, before air travel returned to 2019 levels. Without an explanation from “The Sage”, I am searching for one and have come up with two possibilities:

• The results for the first quarter were depressing and that got to him. (I use the singular, as the size and long-term holding period suggests that this was the curve ball pitcher himself making the primary decision.) Many felt that way, including a very long trail of the AAII weekly sample survey.
• While the political inclination of Mr. Buffett tends to lean toward the Democrats, he may have been worried about Berkshire’s huge position in the financial services sector. The thought that a specific senator from Massachusetts might be Treasury Secretary could well be scary. 

I have great respect for Warren Buffett and even more for Charlie Munger and have learned a lot from them. They have also enriched our clients and personal accounts. The only thing I promise to our accounts is that I will be wrong from time to time. Hopefully, I won’t take too long to recognize my mistake and correct it.  Nevertheless, I am not reducing our exposure to the financial sector at the moment, as with rare exception their stock prices do not reflect their earnings power in normal times. (A lesson I learned from the great John Neff.) I will admit that branches will have to be converted or closed. Quite possibly, lenders will be required to have equity in their borrowers, or similar socially driven radical changes. Governments and societies are unlikely to function successfully without a viable financial sector.

Question of the Week: What are your thoughts?

    

   

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/rotating-leadership-likely-on-horizon.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/more-to-learn-by-seeing-more-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/07/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Rotating Leadership Likely on the Horizon - Weekly Blog # 641

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

Rotating Leadership Likely on the Horizon

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Voters and investors have difficulty separating reporters, analysts, and forecasters, as they themselves don’t understand their function. Unfortunately, each is required to briefly summarize their work without confusing their audience, any more than they are already.  The standard way of reducing the clutter is to find the lowest common denominator or distinctive identity and equate that with all the factors that appear to fit. Thus, one can build a house with a hammer, screwdriver, and a saw.

This approach worked reasonably well for many years but is showing signs of not working as well, due to the size of the lowest common denominator shrinking in both the political and investment spheres, as reporters capture gross movements of a limited number of identities. Analysts track the movements of these identities and most forecasters extrapolate present trends into the future. As a defender and generator of investment capital, I think our responsibility is to look for future changes that in total are threats or opportunities. Some examples?

Politics is a witches’ brew of both policies and pragmatism. On the runup to a much-debated election, most of the chatter is essentially about policies, with very little execution through various governmental actions. Beneath the surface, each of the two major political parties are increasingly split on the implementation of policies. There has been almost no discussion on moving all legislation through the houses of Congress, state legislatures, city councils and even the White House. At this point in the calendar, I suggest very little will pass until later next year. We will then need to deal with the relatively small amount of time before the demands of the 2022 Congressional election materialize, which is likely to dictate the success of the person in the White House. Thus, I have little confidence in all the political inputs into investment decisions, at least for quite a while.

Changing Investment Leadership through Mutual Fund Lenses

Professionals often use more and different tools than the public or the media. In looking at mutual fund performance, most look at the average performance for a category of funds. However, there are two other measures that are useful to me, weighted average and median results. The first measures how the dollars invested are doing and the second measures the midpoint of the group. For the year to date period, there were 2483 large capitalization funds with total assets of $3.2 Trillion. They were essentially flat at +0.40% through August 6th. However, on a weighted average basis, the same group of funds produced a return of +9.98%, a +9.58% spread vs. the average. One of the reasons I expect a rotation away from the extreme focus on growth, is the ten-year spread of large-cap vs. the average only +4.05%.  Growth funds as a category, including large, mid, and small, both domestic and international, had a median ten-year average gain of +11.12% vs +10.35% for the current year to date period.

The real concern with growth is that there are only two handfuls of big winners and perhaps forty performance followers. The spread by size is unsustainable. Year to date, Large Gap Growth is up +21.19%, with the lead taken over by the Mid-Cap Growth +21.53%. The international Small/Mid-Cap Growth peer group was the only negative performer for the period -0.23%. At some point I expect “value” funds to get some exposure as leaders. In terms of the three different performance measures, the group is down -12% year to date. The ten year average compound growth rate was +12.57%, the weighted average +10.96% and the median +11.12%.

Can One Be Early with Value?

The great John Neff of the Windsor Fund, but he was an original thinker, both as an analyst and then portfolio manager. He trained at a mid-western bank before joining Wellington Management in Philadelphia, where he stayed after Jack Bogel pulled the Wellington Funds out of Wellington. After he was fired by the firm, he was resurrected by the outside fund directors to form Vanguard. The portfolio of Windsor was largely comprised of companies headquartered within 500 miles of his Valley Forge office and was heavy weighted toward financials and industrials. When I visited with him during a recession, many of his stocks had little or no earnings, particularly Citi Group. He explained that his stocks were cheap on an earnings power basis and that was more important than current reported earnings. During the recovery he proved to be correct. 

When John retired there were a few retirement dinners for him. At a small gathering in New York, open primarily to those connected with Wellington and Vanguard, there were only two outsiders invited, John Reed, the CEO of Citi, and myself. While many investors define value in terms of liquidating value, John defined it in terms of future value based on the in-depth analysis of earnings power. We continue to search for the new John Neff, as their time is probably coming.

The “Market” is Searching

Each week in Barron’s there is a list of the twenty-five best and ten worst performing funds for the week from my old firm. Normally, over half of each list is from a single peer group, but this week the lists were much more diversified. There were fourteen separate peer groups identified for the winners and eight for the laggards. This indicates that market participants are searching for new winners and losers to be sold. This is a sign that we are probably in a new phase.

Question of the Week: 

Have you found some new names of interest? Or have you given up on any disappointments?

  

   

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/08/more-to-learn-by-seeing-more-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/07/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/07/that-was-week-that-was-change-weekly.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

More to Learn by Seeing More - Weekly Blog # 640

Mike Lipper’s Monday Morning Musings

More to Learn by Seeing More

Editors: Frank Harrison 1997-2018, Hylton Phillips-Page 2018 –

Yogi Berra it was reported to have said that you can see a lot by observing. The distinguishing characteristic of most investors, be they institutions or individuals, is that they thrive on information. However, most investors devour what is served up to them and don’t take the time to observe how the information is served up to them. This week’s blog will focus on two critical streams of information driving the portfolio allocation of many investors. My purpose in displaying how I look at these factors is to illuminate how to look deeper than what is served up, not to suggest that you adapt the way I think.

Asset Allocation

When reviewing investments, most investors start with a listing provided by an advisor, broker, or custodian. The way the information is arrayed often directs our thinking and therefor our actions. We don’t realize that the array reflects how the producer of the portfolio organizes their information flow, often to reduce their liability. When was the last time you were asked how you’d like your investments shown to you? When was the last time your agent asked what other critical information would be useful to you to in making decisions?

During this lazy summer, with the aid of the computer and forced companion in isolation, creating an information matrix giving a different viewpoint. The different view will probably show you how to think about investments and give you a more complete picture, like when your investments will be depleted after meeting various significant expenses.

The following discussion is my first pass at creating an investment framework. It will probably evolve from more thinking and hopefully from the reactions of some of our thoughtful subscribers. I am not recommending this structure for anyone, I’m challenging you to develop your own thinking from a similar exercise.

Once a second investment is added to your first, a portfolio is created. The ability to meet future payments will likely result from the performance of the portfolio, not just a single position. That is true even if the money comes from a position, as it is chosen from the list of available choices. Most investors are collectors of investment opportunities of different natures. Thus, I find it useful to group investments in different categories based on some common theme rather than looking at a portfolio in alphabetical order.

For this first exercise, I created five categories or buckets. In this case the buckets are based on their desired usage and not necessarily their investment characteristics. The five are Capital Preservation, Capital Appreciation, Long-term Hedges, Future Merger & Acquisition candidates, and Expenditures. These terms have specific attributes for me and reveal a great deal regarding my thinking, as described below:

• Capital Preservation requires a belief that these assets will grow reasonably in value over time relative to inflation, purchasing power (currency risk), sustainability through economic cycles, and after-tax benefits. Assuming none of the positions fail to meet the continuing criteria they will be part of my estate. Because the criteria changes over time, the portfolio is also likely to change. For example, a major change in tax regulations could cause some of the holdings to move out of the Capital Preservation bucket. (Notice, I did not specify stocks, fixed income, or public/private investments. Each of these could qualify in the right hands.)
• The Capital Appreciation bucket includes holdings, which over an investment cycle, are expected to do better than the appropriate index. The bucket includes both positions doing well and some fallen angels, where there is hope for recovery. Some fallen angels with large losses should be held until they can be used to offset large realized gains. Because of the inclusion of both fallen angels and some leveraged holdings, I do not expect them to be considered “trust quality”.
• Long-term Hedges are those positions likely to rise when specific Capital Preservation issues are falling. They can be competitive with the Capital Preservation items, e.g. Morgan Stanley vs Goldman Sachs, or an economic trend contrary to a Capital Preservation holding, like Jet fuel oil vs airlines.
• Future Merger & Acquisition holdings would be good companies with attractive products and market share, possibly with an aging senior management with estate problems and weak middle management. Amazon or Tesla could be examples.
• Expenditures would include available cash in various currencies and instruments. The currencies result from fund and individual security distributions, where their initial purpose was to be a small reserve for future purchases of investments in those currencies.

In the table below is the current percentage commitment to each bucket and the current number of holdings.

                                  

Allocation            % of Total  

Capital Preservation       40   

Capital Appreciation       34   

L-T Hedges                 10  

Future M & A               13  

Expenditures                3   

                        Approx. #

Allocation             of Holdings

Capital Preservation        29

Capital Appreciation        54

L-T Hedges                   2

Future M & A                22

Expenditures                 7

Clearly, there is little relation between the level of commitment and the number of holdings in each bucket. To emphasize that point, adding the single most heavily owned position in each bucket would represent 42% of the total portfolio, demonstrating the power of compounding winners. The large number of holdings represent a behavior pattern of investing in a number of companies when entering a new industry or sector. It also reflects the retention of a number of fallen angels, either due to a belief in an eventual recovery, or the desire to reduce the tax impact of selling large winners.

What would you do with this portfolio instead of one heavily invested in financial services, that is globally diversified with an Asia heavy focus and a substantial Canadian commitment? I am not suggesting the unconventional display above is superior, it is just different and might add to your decision making capabilities.

There are any number of other buckets you can use to group your investments. The following is just a sample for both individuals and institutions, it is far from exhaustive.

                              

Sample Allocation Categories

For Individuals             

Pre and Post Retirement     

Acquisition of Major Real Estate      

Major Family Event                          

Large Educational Bills                       

Death and Inheritance Issues            

 

For Institutions

Credit Rating Protection

New Buildings or Laboratories

Funds for strategic acquisitions

Balance sheet to repel a raid

Sufficient Flexibility to Pivot

Operating Leverage

So far, in the second quarter of this year most companies reported materially larger declines in operating earnings than in revenues, excluding some tech companies. Under normal conditions this would indicate the company has lost control of its costs and should be sold. However, as with everything on our march to a series of “New Normals”, our experience and training may prove to be wrong. 

Many companies claim their staff is their most critical asset. (I disagree and believe their customers are their biggest asset, followed by their people.) Most successful companies are labeled as skilled or non-skilled, regardless of their existing employees bringing them to their recent former highs. Instead of slashing employment along with sales, some are consciously increasing their losses by maintaining employment or payroll for as many of their people as possible. In many cases this is likely to prove to be wise from the employee, management, and shareholder point of view. Thus, when analyzing second and possibly third quarter’s earnings, try to grasp how much of the operating earnings decline is due to the fall in sales and covering current expenses. How much of the cost is for carrying employees that are not currently producing? That is exactly what I did when I was running a larger firm during periodic market declines. It proved to be a wise move for our clients, employees, and not bad for me either.

Please let me know if I am making sense to you or if you need help in building your own Personal Allocation View.

  

   

Did you miss my blog last week? Click here to read.

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/07/mike-lippers-monday-morning-musings.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/07/that-was-week-that-was-change-weekly.html

https://mikelipper.blogspot.com/2020/07/currently-selling-more-important-than.html

Did someone forward you this blog? 

To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday morning, please subscribe by emailing me directly at AML@Lipperadvising.com

Copyright © 2008 - 2018

A. Michael Lipper, CFA

All rights reserved

Contact author for limited redistribution permission.