My grandfather was a successful investor over his lifetime. He cautioned my older brother and me that the person on the other side of a stock trade was probably as smart as we were, if not smarter. As this week and month were drawing to a close on Friday afternoon, the stock market fell sharply. In the last half hour of trading the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) fell almost 70 points. In a so-called “normal” trading day the number of stocks rising is close to the number declining. On an unusually decisive day the ratio can be as high as 3 to 1, either way. On Friday there was five times the number of decliners than stocks gaining in price for the day. What happened? I don’t know, but my thoughts went to the wisdom of my grandfather. Traders have learned from bitter experience not to fight the tape by going against a strong trend. As one who has learned to take advantage of market disruptions I should have been a buyer, but I wasn’t. During this period of turmoil is it possible, perhaps probable, that the sellers know something? Normally both buyers and sellers can be correct on a given trade because they are using different time frames for their decisions and value the same bit of information differently. I believe the intensity of the selling caused normal buyers to pull back from trading. Compared to brief major price onslaughts in the past, there were few if any effective market stabilizing forces at work. Previously floor-based specialists and “upstairs” trading desks put their capital at risk to calm the market.
Possible explanations
As of this weekend there is no
available, credible analysis on what set off the sharp decline but there are
three reasonable triggers that could have caused concerns on the part of
portfolio managers on the last day of the month.
1. The market had completed four years
from its bottom in March of 2009 and this summer/fall we will have passed six
years from the prior peak. Just in the last five months the DJIA has gained
15.3% and the S&P500 14.3%. Some investors, typically in financials, did
even better with gross gains of 23%. Clearly there is a strong desire to
preserve good to great results in an aging bull market.
2. Often I have suggested that the
fixed income market can be an early warning device for the stock market. Very
recently the yield spreads on high yield (junk bonds) has started to widen
compared to comparable US Treasury issues. Separately, Barron’s has maintained a confidence index comparing the yield to
maturities on selected high quality bonds and intermediate quality issues. This week the ratio was 73.2 compared to 67.7
a year ago which suggests that there is some concern as to intermediate credits.
A further indicator that fixed income investors/savers are looking for credit
quality is the interest rate available on money market accounts which dropped
to 0.46%, the lowest I remember seeing. Bottom line: I don’t see any Bond
bulls.
3. Quite possibly Japan has replaced
China as the major foreign concern. In terms of China we are dealing with a
well-advertised slowdown in its economy and a possible return of the Chinese to
the commodity markets. What is replacing the China worry is the attempt of the
Bank of Japan (BOJ) to utilize monetary quantitative easing. The BOJ is trying
to induce a goal of 2% inflation to shakeup an economy that in a real sense has
not grown in 24 years. The route that they are taking is to lower the value of
the yen relative to all of its main trading partners. Some have called this the
first shot in a currency war which already is not sitting well with Japan’s
competitors. For some, this eerily looks like the currency war that made the
industrial recession into the economic depression of the thirties. The BOJ’s
strategy can only work if the US does not taper off its own “QE” and other
countries do not retaliate with competitive devaluations. This last week the
Chairman of the US Federal Reserve discussed looking into possible procedures
for beginning a tapering-off process at some future point.
What to do?
Tops of markets usually don’t occur
at convenient times. This weekend I reviewed the major winning positions in our
stock portfolios as well as a number of winning positions in funds that we own
for institutional and individual clients. In terms of the stocks even though
they have advanced significantly, they are selling substantially below what I
believe a knowledgeable strategic buyer should pay for a number of unique
holdings. Worse, there is an understandable fear that once sold, similar
“jewels” will be hard to find at reasonable prices. Perhaps what makes the
decision to sell even harder are the attempts by various central banks to push
us further along on the risk continuum just as their own balance sheets are
taking on the attributes of a highly leveraged shadow lender. Yields on the
DJIA are slightly higher and those on the S&P500 close to the yield on the
ten-year US Treasury note. (By the way, we will start to see fund and manager
advertising which touts 3 and 5 year performance, but the market is focusing on
ten year periods as representative of possible future results.)
My inclination
Recognizing that in all likelihood I
will loose some of the gains that my accounts have received in 2013, I will
probably hold onto most of our positions waiting for the return of the army of
strategic buyers. Please share with me what are you doing or what do you advise
me to do. I don’t want to be scared out of position by the sellers.
_______________________
Did you miss Mike Lipper’s Blog last
week? Click here
to read.
Did someone forward you this
Blog? To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using
the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com .
Copyright © 2008 - 2013 A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
Copyright © 2008 - 2013 A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment