Sunday, November 1, 2015

Rising Earnings Do Not Make a Growth Stock



Introduction

Caltech is the origin of many new companies as well as Nobel Prizes. Each year Caltech treats its trustees at its Annual Meeting to a number of research presentations by some of its leading professors. To the extent that we can comprehend what is being said, my wife and I find these talks one of the highlights of our visits. Along with other leading research universities, Caltech is an internal tech transfer group that both licenses some of its growing intellectual properties and also occasionally invests in the pre-IPO activities. Next month I will be addressing a couple dozen CEOs who are in the process of raising public capital.

The Next to Last Ownership

Both the entrepreneurial professors and the later stage CEOs are heavily focused on the next capital raise as they should be. To the extent that they are successful and don’t lose their independence, they should start to think about developing attractive characteristics for the next to last ownership of their shares. Often when successful, the next to last owner will be established growth stock holders, most of the time found in Growth fund type vehicles. (The last owner will be the eventual buyer from the originator’s estate.)

Sustainable growth of capital is the prime objective for many of these buyers. In our context I am talking about positions in the Endowment Portfolio within the TIMESPAN L PORTFOLIOS®. Assuming no reason to sell, these positions should have a duration between six and sixteen years before some are transitioned over to the Legacy Portfolio for the benefit of future generations.

Finding Sustainable Growth

Numbers, process, and management are the clues to follow in the search to find sustainable growth. Numbers that are ratios, trends, and deviations are the easiest to appropriately identify. Good professional security analysts should have the appropriate intellectual rigor required. This process requires some depth of understanding of what the company, customers and competitors actually do and think. Someone with experience and broad business knowledge can help.

The Difficulty When Analyzing Management

Assessing management is the most difficult of the analytical tasks and requires the greatest amount of humility. From an early age successful survivors are artful in hiding both emotions and thought patterns. If it is difficult to scope-out one talented person's relations with other people (some of whom are just as bright) it is more difficult by an order of magnitude to do the same for an entire management team.

Focus on the Numbers

I will first focus on the easiest of the three clues, the numbers. As other sports followers have learned, one of the things that one becomes skilled at from “handicapping” or analyzing at the racetrack is to be suspicious of a continuation of long streaks. We know that very good performers have off days. Understanding the reasons for falling off a sustained trend line would help, but that is not always discernible. Nevertheless, I am comfortable throwing a rare mishap out in my guess as to the future. Unless something major has changed, I tend to accept an 80% compliance with a trend to be useful as an element to future predictions. Also, one of the lessons people should have learned from the Madoff scandal is that perfection is suspicious.

In viewing my comments about financial statement analysis, please bear in mind that I don’t expect every stock in a sustainable growth stock portfolio to completely mirror these filters, but the weighted average of the holdings should. I am not going to comment on every line item in the Income Statement and Balance Sheet. However, each item may color a prudent investor’s decision process much more than the press release of XX % gain in earnings per share. This is particularly the case if the GAAP accounting earnings are considerably different than the more popular non-GAAP numbers.

Operating Revenues

In the business as well as the personal worlds, without a consummated sale there is little belief. After I understand how revenue is recorded I like to see periodic growth that is faster than that experienced in the sector. A fad sales is often like a report of speed dating. While not normally reported, repeat sales demonstrate that in the eyes of the customer that the sale addresses a  customer’s problem. Repeated revenues from the same customer is showing dependency which is the goal of the drive for sustainable relations. In addition, growth in market share shows competitive strength except for the price leader which may be buying the business by educating the customer to place price over value. Often it is extremely valuable to be recognized as the low cost producer. Though it is a extremely valuable defensive weapon, it is analogous to eating one’s young. On the other hand, being acknowledged as the low cost producer can exert some price discipline on a competitor. Good analysts will markdown sales growth if returns and warranty costs are rising. (Inventory management will be discussed when balance sheet accounts are reviewed.)

Gross Margins

The direct cost to growth product companies to produce sales is often about half of the revenues received over a market cycle, producing a gross margin in the 40-60% range. Service companies, where their principal expenses are people costs, can have lower gross margins as they have materially lower plant and equipment depreciation. Many financial services companies use substantial amounts of borrowed capital (unless it is customers’ float), and have interest costs that bring margins below those of product producers. Analysts become concerned when gross margins contract because it may signal some loss of competitive standing with peers or from substitute products from outside the industry.

Operating Margins

After the cost to produce a current product or service there are other costs which include selling and general corporate administration (SG&A). In addition to research and development for new products are periodic charges that need to be absorbed as well as depreciation and other charges. Often interest expenses are included. I prefer to see a net interest item that subtracts from interest earned the interest paid/accrued. If net interest is a significant item, analysts may question whether the company has an adequate capital structure and how it will get one. Overall operating margins can be approximately 20 percentage points below gross margins.

Income Tax Rates

Analysts want to know what income taxes have been paid or accrued. Most importantly the source of the differences and the implications for the future. Wise tax management is applauded if it does not constrain the company’s future actions.

Impact of Foreign Sales and Earnings Translation

A long-term investor normally does not want to value currency translation gains and losses highly. However, hedging does tell investors what management’s is attitude toward short-term results. There are several ways to hedge. The more popular short-term approach is by entering the foreign exchange market through derivatives and/or local currencies. A longer-term approach is to balance sales and earnings from various foreign countries with the home or functional currency. One also needs to understand in which currencies the bulk of the foreign operation’s expenses are incurred. Further it is important to understand in which currency profits are measured including where and at what level taxes are paid and when.

Reporting on Industrial Conditions

Good analysts will have other sources of information as to the growth in various markets as well as significant price trends. The reporting company should be a source of these critical elements in an unbiased way. The absence of these may show a lack of serious interest in their shareholders’ welfare.

Brief Balance Sheet Concerns

Inventories - Often a firm will provide three levels of inventory: finished products, work in process, and raw materials. If inventory levels are rising faster than sales, particularly in the finished products and to a somewhat lesser extent in work in progress, it can be a tip off that the company may have to lower its selling prices or improve its terms to bring inventory levels back below the sales rate. If the build up is in the raw materials line item, the company may be speculating as to future rising prices or trying to create a shortage as a competitive device. In any case, changes in inventory levels need to be understood.

Fixed Assets -  Physical fixed assets of plant and equipment are recorded at historical cost, unless written down minus accumulated depreciation. Depending on the industry, the ratio of the remaining un-depreciated assets as a percent of the original cost of the assets compared with peers can be a useful clue as to which competitor has the newest facilities and possibly who has the lowest cost of production relative to its sales level.

Intellectual Property -  Intellectual property can be of great value to a company’s barriers to entry or moat. The size of the moat and how well it is defended can be critical in the ability of the company to resist attacks by competitors. To my mind this is of secondary importance compared with the clients’ dependency on the company’s products and services and the clients’ attitude toward that dependence.

Liabilities - Accrued but unpaid taxes, while they create valuable float, as in all liabilities need to be understood and appropriately recorded. One also needs to ensure the full extent of the retirement liability is recorded. (In terms of educational institutions rarely is there an estimate of the long-term cost of tenure.) One of the jobs of a thorough analyst is to determine the off balance sheet contingency reserves. If a company states it doesn’t have one, that can be a problem.

The Second Clue = Process

For a company to have a sustainable growth pattern it needs a well understood and hopefully written down process for most of its critical functions. A thorough research report should be able to summarize the process as well as reports to regulators and shareholders. A series of well defined processes can aid a company if critical management disappears or perhaps serve as an aid in regulatory inspections. Far too many institutional shareholders do not fully understand the critical processes. This means that when there is a market disruption investors will be flying blind until they can get a reasonably full and responsive communication with the company. Often this will lead to the sale of the position in part due to unfounded but believable rumors.
  
The Toughest Clue = Management

While past history is never fully complete and not exactly like the current condition, it is somewhat helpful but hardly guaranteed. In Jason Zweig’s new book “The Devil’s Financial Dictionary” he quotes Warren Buffett, “When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.” Nevertheless, we often have to make a decision as to whether the existing management can carry the company to the rosy future in which we would like to believe. The attributes that we look for are as follows:

1. Unquestioned integrity, not only in a legal sense, but also in an intellectual sense. We need to recognize that some people lie to themselves and overstate their views of the future.

2. Innovations both of product and process are critical to long term success.

3. How do the key executives as well as those at the lower level treat each other is a good clue as to how they will treat absentee owners of both debt and equity.

4. Good controls of people, finances and processes will provide the everyday discipline which is critical to the success of the enterprise.

I look forward to discussing these thoughts with you.
_________   
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here  to read. 



Comment or email me a question to MikeLipper@Gmail.com.

Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com 

Copyright © 2008 - 2015
A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Announcement + Misplaced Focus Hurts Results



Announcement for Timespan L Portfolios®

I am very pleased to announce that our affiliate, Whitridge LLC has been awarded Registration No. 4,837,713 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the designation of Timespan L Portfolios®.  Timespan L Portfolios is a unique strategy designed to address the multi-faceted needs of significant investors within an idea of creating a structure that can be used for many decades into the future.

Information for competent investment advisors and other financial institutions wishing license information for this service is available.

For more information, email me at: aml@lipperadvising.com
------------------------------

Misplaced Focus Hurts Results

Introduction

In sports, wars, politics, and investments why do smarter opponents with more resources lose to more agile competitors with less resources? In selecting funds for long-term investing we make a practice to analyze the successful and unsuccessful managers. History is replete with examples of seemingly smarter, bigger forces with substantially more resources losing critical battles. Often the losers believe in their own superiority and that they will produce a never-ending series of victories. Napoleon said that "God is on the side of the bigger battalions," then went on to be defeated at his Waterloo by smaller forces he had beaten previously.  In addition Napoleon did not use his battle trained reserves well. Today we are seeing the rise of "populist" political leaders globally, either on the Right, the Left or even by established political parties and their leaders. This phenomenon is little different than the fall of various “Investment Kings” to different managers who are practicing the game dissimilarly and often much more narrowly.

One of the first clues that a manager will not succeed long-term is the amount of space he/she devotes to the economy and current politics in views and writings. Few future winners start their investment pitch with a discussion of GDP (Gross Domestic Product). I agree with the current number two in China who suggested some time ago he did not trust the numbers produced by his government staff as they were “man made,” which suggested that they could be either inaccurate or corrupt for political purposes. He preferred to rely on industry statistics produced in the private sector; e.g., electricity, freight car loadings, and bank loans (to private companies and individuals) .

The error of focusing initially on the economy is that it starts the thinking process of viewing things from the top down. This is a useful exercise for those that use, or perhaps abuse, the media to pontificate to unsuspecting audiences. It also is a prepaid mechanism when something doesn't work, (“The economy or the government did not do what was expected.”)

Many years ago I was exposed to a much more successful way of thinking which is bottoms up. Often, after a busy day of visiting many portfolio managers in his city, I had a private dinner with at that time was the leader of the single most successful fund group in the world. I thought our dinner table conversation would be about broad fund industry topics and politics which was dispatched quickly. What really turned him on was analysis of individual stocks that weren't well followed. The discussion often focused on what was the critical analytical approach to various companies and most importantly, about the relative strengths and weaknesses of different managers. Occasionally I would come up with new thoughts for him. With only some success I tried to apply this approach with him on some of his various leading funds. Ultimately these insights were of great use to me and eventually my investment clients on the likelihood of the continuation of various "hot hands" who were doing extraordinarily well exploiting various inefficiencies in the market. I recognized many of these aspects for I had travelled with a number of his analysts and portfolio managers.

Today when either an associate or I visits funds we zero in on bottoms up details from portfolio managers and spend as little time as possible following top down chatter. The same approach leads to more fruitful conversations with CEOs of public and private companies. Apply the same approach to how you live your life. The details of what you have to do today is much more important than the top down topics called upon in today's media.

Bottoms Up Factoids

The job of an analyst is to review an enormous amount of bottom up type of details that when combined with previous knowledge or beliefs lead to areas of future analysis (or for the moment to be added to the discard pile). The following are from my readings of this week.

1. Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt funds was far and away the best performing fund classification for the month to Thursday, +4.36% to bring its year to date loss to ­-9.70%. This class of funds that earlier in the year was being heavily pushed as an extra income provider was quite volatile and produced equity type performance as distinct from acting like a high yield bond fund.

2. According to The Economist most equity markets were strong, 37 out of 43 showed gains with half equaling or performing better than our Dow Jones Industrial Average. However, only 15 were positive for the year. This suggests that with selectivity one can beat US results. In our Timespan L Portfolios® there can be roles for international funds and stocks in both the Endowment and Legacy Portfolios.

3. For those who believe in sector rotation, using FactSet data, three out of ten S&P 500 sectors, Health Care, Industrials, and Consumer Staples are nine years from their prior peaks. If one combines a contrarian streak and some bottoms up knowledge of removing capacity from production, there could be surprisingly selective good performance within the next year. As this is more of a cyclical play as far as the Timespan L Portfolios is concerned, the most logical space for these kinds of investments would be in the Replenishment Portfolio.

4.  An article by Matt Ridley in The Wall Street Journal proclaimed, "Most technological break-throughs come from technologists tinkering, not from researchers chasing hypotheses." I believe a well managed research program that can recognize commercial opportunities is worthwhile in companies that have large enough operating earnings to afford long-term research and development. However, I am much more interested in companies that have a  history of sound development. The Endowment Portfolio should have some representation of well managed research and development companies. The Legacy portfolio could hold the "wild card" type of investment.

In reply to Questions of the Week

I read and think about your questions and replies. This week is in part an answer to DB and his thoughts on GDP. He will get a more complete reply directly.

_________   
Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com 

Copyright © 2008 - 2015
A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
All Rights Reserved.
Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

Sunday, October 18, 2015

To Win, Escape the Crowd

Introduction

Big wins are most often surprises. Typically they arise from lonely corners of the investment world. Having known a number of the portfolio managers that have produced surprisingly good investment performances, I have detected a pattern. First, while intelligent, the winners are not measurably smarter than their competitors. Second, they seek information in the nooks and crannies of the world. They look broader and deeper than most. Third, they derive confidence from the realization that few, if any, share their views of what they have discovered

The interesting question is why do the winners succeed and equally bright, if not brighter, managers with larger staffs of competent analysts and in many cases greater commission power do not? I believe I have some clues to this result, and further I have some thoughts about current potential areas of future success.

The Enemy of Wise Selections are Labels


One of the early academic screens for determining intelligence in children is a test that shows a number of objects and the youngster is asked which of these things are like the others. We identify intelligence with the ability to group like things together. Later on we learn to put labels on groups having similarities. Too often children grow up seeing the world as a collection of labels. They become programmed to make judgments by collecting enough from different labeled characteristics to give them a winner. 


Our educational system combined with our fears of making "stupid" (i.e., unpopular) decisions forces people into what quantitative analysts call central tendencies. Thus, people assemble their decision matrix based on labels with investment names like growth, value, quality, size, etc. Luckily for the US Marines, when often facing massive forces on the other side, the opposition leadership relies on labels and equates two units of equal size but of different experience and expertise to be equal. Of the many things we learn as Marine Corps officers are the characteristics of the individual Marine that will govern the likelihood of success.  The same philosophy works in the investment world.

As a junior securities analyst, for a period of time I was assigned to cover the domestic steel industry. At that time they all used the same production process with the same raw materials. When looking at the majors, many in the financial community chose the steel stock that had the lowest price/earnings ratio. I remember coming to my seniors and suggesting that two of the stocks were worth more than the average P/E in the group, because one was more integrated with its own natural resources and the other had mills much closer to its big customers and thus would have lower transportation costs. (Years later I was happy to note that these two were the last to go through major reorganizations.) The important analytical lesson was the willingness to dissect the labeled specimens.

Looking For Needles in a Haystack


Each weekend culminates my week's effort to find investment value. The first screen I use is to determine where the bulk of the investment thinking is on any given subject. The second is to scan widely various statistical arrays to find elements of change that do not appear to be  believed by "The Crowd."

Barron’s  “Big Money Poll”

This week Barron's published an annual article that reviewed results of an extensive list of financial and economic questions answered by a large number of substantial institutional investors. As part of my two step approach for uncovering winning investments I paid particular attention to views shared by 70% of the respondents to this "Big Money Poll." As regular subscribers to these posts perhaps realize, I tend to examine contrary points of view. Certainly not all contrary views will prove to be correct, but when they do turn out to be right the magnitude of future price moves is considerably larger than when the more popular view succeeds.

With that caveat in mind, please look at the following readings from the poll:

  • In terms of the equity market 76% of their clients are neutral. (53% of the managers are bullish.)
  • 75% of the managers do not foresee a 10% or greater decline.
  • Three stocks are expected to rise:  Alphabet 87%, Apple 77%* and Berkshire Hathaway*. 
  • 72% think that IBM will decline.
  • 73% saw no deflation.
* Stocks owned personally or in my managed private financial services fund.
     
     
    Three Insights from Mutual Fund Data

    Because of my background and my management responsibilities I also look carefully at mutual fund data to see if any of the data flow is predictive or at least coincident with changes in investment attitudes. Three items worth commenting are shown below:

    1.  While mutual fund investors redeemed $2.2 Billion net from equity funds, $4.7 Billion went into equity Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). As most of the dollars that go into ETFs are believed to be from institutional type investors, this reinforces the Big Poll finding that the managers are bullish. (Perhaps these largely index fund purchases are being made to hedge individual stock short positions.) I believe the outflows from traditional mutual funds are not a sign of dissatisfaction, but the absence of offsetting fund purchases. The sellers are often in the process of changing their assets around to meet lifestyle needs. The absence of retail sales volume  buttresses this argument.

    2.  Secondly, the average Precious Metals fund gained +8.33% for the week ending Thursday. This gain, driven by the gold price, brings the year to date loss to -7.63%. To me, this gain is indicating that buyers are viewing precious metals in more of a monetary sense than as an inflation hedge. An index of funds investing in Base Metals is off much more, -12.80% which suggests that investors are not currently expecting rising inflations.

    3.  The third item is a comment by an investment manager at Prudential that the widened spread on "junk bonds" versus similar maturity treasuries is getting interesting. I am intrigued with the fact that the average General US Treasury fund over the twelve months is up +5.59% and the average High Yield Mutual Bond fund is off -4.40%. A reversal of performance would be quite a surprise.

    Finally, I scan lots of material and this week found two other items that are worth thinking about. The first is that small/mid sized businesses make the point that their second biggest problem is finding qualified labor. The first is taxes. The other item of interest is a statement in a US government publication that the presence of high frequency traders in the treasury market may be giving the illusion of liquidity.

    Bottom Line

    If you want to make winning investments, look deeper where others don't, and avoid reliance on labels.

    Question of the Week: Do you have some examples of winning investments that you would like to share?

    _________   
    Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

    Comment or email me a question to MikeLipper@Gmail.com.

    Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com 

    Copyright © 2008 - 2015
    A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
    All Rights Reserved.
    Contact author for limited redistribution permission.

    Sunday, October 11, 2015

    Was the first week of October the Bull Market?


     Introduction

    When everything was falling in price in August, I suggested that one should start to place orders to buy some of the "falling knives" which had the biggest declines, around -20%. These items included commodities and commodity related investments as well as TIPS. My view was that off a bottom there is often roughly a ten percent "relief rally" and this was the easiest money to earn in a new bull market.

    In the period from October 1 - 8 , 2015, the following six out of 96 equity oriented mutual fund classifications' investment objectives produced double digit returns:

    Natural Resource funds                   
    + 14.34%
    Precious Metals funds                     
    +  13.58
    Global Natural Resources funds      
    +  13.32
    Equity Leverage funds                      
    +  12.04
    Energy MLP funds                             
    +  11.18 
    Basic Materials funds                         
    +  10.76

    As we know the price of crude oil rose 9% during the week, but there was more to these gains than the oil price pop. While there was undoubtedly a rush to cover various short positions, there were some participants that were sensing the potential for future inflation. More will be needed for the investors in these funds to break even for the year. Even after the double digit gains for the week, five out of the six groups shown above were still down double digits. (Equity Leverage funds were down -9.72% for the year to date.)

    Smaller gains were made in the week by 93 out of 96 investment objectives tracked by my old firm now part of ThomsonReuters. Only few of these were able to show gains for the year. These tended to be large growth funds often with meaningful positions in the much politically derided Health/Biotech group. At least Moody's is concerned that we have not seen the bottom of oil prices, they have lowered the credit ratings on five US regional banks which have substantial energy loans outstanding. Being a contrarian I would watch these for an entry point, as I am convinced that in time the underlying collateral will be good on balance.

    Even though we are not traders (as we invest for lengthy periods) we need to be aware of others in the marketplace. The risk for the trader is that the double digit that some funds enjoyed fulfilled "the easy 10%" pop expected after the sharpness of the summer declines. Now the trading question becomes whether the August lows will need to be tested in order to put in the low for the year, if we are going to have a meaningful recovery before the US presidential election year.

    We Don't Care

    As long-term investors we are not very excited by this year's performance unless it has significance in terms of the implications of meeting our clients’ longer term payments needs of their distant beneficiaries. Why am I so relaxed at the moment? First, I believe last week's move was in recognition of some changing attitudes beyond the "oil patch." As is often is the case, I look to the fixed income world for guidance. Domestically, taxable bond fund classifications showed gains, albeit small. These for the most part were funds that trafficked in lower credit rated paper. For people to bid these up they could not be very concerned about a meaningful recession. The other message that I perceived was that the poorly performing TIPS funds gained while other US Government Bond funds showed minor losses.

    Foreign Signals

    Emerging Market Bond funds, in local currencies, produced the best returns among fixed income types by a wide margin last week, +4.44%; in contrast with Emerging Markets Debt hard currency issues +1.84%. Bond funds which invested in more developed countries gained +1.3%.  My interpretation of these results is, at least for the week, that market participants were suggesting the meteoritic rise in the dollar was at least peaking.

    Volatility

    The investing public that is glued to the media is fearful of triple digit price changes in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Using the somewhat less volatile S&P 500 since 1928 according to Factset/StockCharts, the days with a 1% (Up or Down) occurs every four or five days. As a matter of fact I set my computer alerts to only inform me when prices move at least 2% and don't consider action below 3-5%. The New York  Federal Reserve Bank is somewhat addressing these concerns in the corporate bond market that has had bank trading capital reduced by 75%. They maintain that there is ample liquidity to absorb sudden shifts in prices. (Interestingly enough, they did not address what in theory is the deepest fixed income market in the world, the market for US Treasuries. Because of rapid global trading of these instruments through computer interfaces by non-bank dealers and investors, I am worried. During hectic periods of unwinding "carry trades" when treasuries are collateral for borrowings in more exotic paper, I am concerned by the chance for some indigestion.) 

    Question of the Week: How are you addressing this market, did this week mean anything?

    _________   
    Did you miss my blog last week?  Click here to read.

    Comment or email me a question to MikeLipper@Gmail.com.

    Did someone forward you this Blog?  To receive Mike Lipper’s Blog each Monday, please subscribe using the email or RSS feed buttons in the left column of MikeLipper.Blogspot.com 

    Copyright © 2008 - 2015
    A. Michael Lipper, C.F.A.,
    All Rights Reserved.
    Contact author for limited redistribution permission.